6530 of 2005
In the High Court of Justice
Chancery Division
Companies Court
In the matter of Triad Group Plc
and in the matter of the Companies Act 1985
MIRA MAKAR
Claimant
- and -
TRIAD GROUP PLC
ALISTAIR FULTON
IAN HAYNES
JOHN RIGG
Defendants
6530 of 2005
In the High Court of Justice
Chancery Division
Companies Court
In the matter of Triad Group Plc
and in the matter of the Companies Act 1985
MIRA MAKAR
Claimant
- and -
TRIAD GROUP PLC
ALISTAIR FULTON
IAN HAYNES
JOHN RIGG
Defendants
6530 of 2005
In the High Court of Justice
Chancery Division
Companies Court
In the matter of Triad Group Plc
and in the matter of the Companies Act 1985
MIRA MAKAR
Claimant
- and -
TRIAD GROUP PLC
ALISTAIR FULTON
IAN HAYNES
JOHN RIGG
Defendants
6530 of 2005
In the High Court of Justice
Chancery Division
Companies Court
In the matter of Triad Group Plc
and in the matter of the Companies Act 1985
MIRA MAKAR
Claimant
- and -
TRIAD GROUP PLC
ALISTAIR FULTON
IAN HAYNES
JOHN RIGG
Defendants
6530 of 2005
In the High Court of Justice
Chancery Division
Companies Court
In the matter of Triad Group Plc
and in the matter of the Companies Act 1985
MIRA MAKAR
Claimant
- and -
TRIAD GROUP PLC
ALISTAIR FULTON
IAN HAYNES
JOHN RIGG
Defendants
6530 of 2005
In the High Court of Justice
Chancery Division
Companies Court
In the matter of Triad Group Plc
and in the matter of the Companies Act 1985
MIRA MAKAR
Claimant
- and -
TRIAD GROUP PLC
ALISTAIR FULTON
IAN HAYNES
JOHN RIGG
Defendants
6530 of 2005
In the High Court of Justice
Chancery Division
Companies Court
In the matter of Triad Group Plc
and in the matter of the Companies Act 1985
MIRA MAKAR
Claimant
- and -
TRIAD GROUP PLC
ALISTAIR FULTON
IAN HAYNES
JOHN RIGG
Defendants
20 July 2020 15:21
No due notice for 21 July 2020 (20.7.20 15.21):
No served grounds or evidence sufficient to found a discernible cause of action for which a ten month prison sentence in a high secure prison during a pandemic is a predictable outcome.
Information on 20 July 2020 15:21 that there is to be an "application" heard on 21 July 2020 10:30 by attendance (no court reference in "Subject") does not comprise due notice.
Lawyers cannot be instructed, nor can they instruct counsel in such timescales.
The "application" is stated to be to "commit". Sentencing is a matter post trial for an offence, having been indicted before starting. It relies on sentencing guidelines and judge, not members of the public making a request to have someone incarcerated because they consider them excrement (May 2017 notification to MM by AMF, before seemingly concurring witnesses SMS, JCR, using TRD funded mobile) which excrement they had thought they had dealt with by flushing down the toilet but now sought to put away in high secure prison, raiding their bank account, so all means of subsistence were at an end before the August Bank Holiday 2020.
From: Simon Hobbs
Sent: 20 July 2020 15:21
To: 'mira.makar@btinternet.com' <mira.makar@btinternet.com>
Subject: TRIAD GROUP PLC (1) NICHOLAS BURROWS (2) AND ALISTAIR FULTON (3)
-v- MIRA MAKAR
Dear Madam
Hearing Date: 21 July 2020 @ 10.30am
I have just been informed that the Hearing listed tomorrow is now a physical, rather than a remote, Hearing at The Queen’s Bench Division, RCJ.
It has been listed as follows:
COURT 11
Before MR JUSTICE LAVENDER
Tuesday, 21st July 2020
At half past 10
ROBED
APPLICATION TO COMMIT
QB-2018-000581 Triad Group Plc and others v Makar