What is distinctive about putting recovery at the heart of mental healthcare? What does recovery add to our understanding of the nature of mental health and illness? Is there a recovery model in contrast with bio-medical or psycho-social models?This session explores the conceptual underpinnings of these questions through four related questions:
1. What is a recovery model?
2. Can we defend the recovery model?
3. Which values?
4. Why narratives?
Slides for the session are here.
My own publications which relate to these issues include:
Directly on the recovery model
Thornton, T. and Lucas, P. (2010) ‘On the very idea of a recoverymodel for mental health’ J Med Ethics 37: 24-8
Thornton, T. (2012) ‘Is recovery a model?’ in Rudnick, A. (ed) The Recovery of People with Mental Illness Oxford University Press: 236-51
On values based practice
Thornton, T. (2011) ‘Radical liberal values based practice’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17: 988-91
Thornton, T. (2008) ‘Values based practice and reflective judgement’ Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 15: 125-133
On narrative understanding
Thornton, T. (2010) ‘Narrative rather than idiographic approachesas counterpart to the nomothetic approach to assessment’ Psychopathology 16: 284-291
Thornton, T. (2010) ‘Psychiatric explanation and understanding’ European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6: 95-111
Thornton, T. (2008) ‘Does understanding individuals require idiographicjudgement?’ European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258 Suppl 5:104–109