Canadian University Rowing Association
Executive Meeting
4pm, January 23rd, 2019
1. Reviewed current procedures
a. New proposal process going well.
b. Need to send agenda and proposals out 2 weeks in advance.
c. Could make form for subcommittee responses.
2. Proposal Discussions:
a. Constitution: Agreed on accepting.
b. DNS: Agreed on accepting.
c. Eligibility:
i. Need to send reminders regarding September 5thdeadline
ii. September 5thcan be a draft list
iii. Is the deadline in the playing regulations?
iv. Streamline the format: less data and novices
d. Interuniversity: Agreed to not support.
i. Already addressed in playing regulations.
ii. Opportunity to race for any university.
e. Scoring: Agreed to not support. Agrees with subcommittee’s idea to strike another subcommittee to review current events and points structure.
i. DB heading subcommittee. Define parameters and immediately populate.
f. Voting: Executive not in agreement.
i. Root problem is with uneducated voters.
ii. Idea: 3-5 year participation waiting period.
iii. Improved education:
· Sending out proposals ahead of time
· Sending out subcommittee reports
· Sharing rules and regulations
3. Meeting
a. Structure for proposal review:
i. Introduction 1 minute
· Motion put forward
ii. Proposer Explains 3-5 minutes
iii. Subcommittee Chair 3 minutes
iv. Executive/President 2 minutes
v. Questions 10 minutes
vi. Vote
b. Seating arrangement
c. Update agenda
d. Set-up conference call
i. Contact Jen Fitzpatrick
4. FISU
a. Report? MP, AV, & MW?
5. Regatta Central
a. Heritage platform is a good solution.
6. Strategic Planning
a. Discussion with RSA
b. Discussion with PSOs
c. Action item: KE engage with RCA