Modal verbs are a special group of auxiliary verbs used to express attitudes or degrees of certainty, ability, obligation, necessity, or permission in relation to an action. Instead of describing actions themselves, modals show the speaker’s stance or viewpoint toward the action.
• No inflection
Modals do not take -s in the third person singular, past or -ing form.
✅She can swim.
❌She cans swim.
They are always followed by the base form of the main verb (without to).
You must finish on time.
Modals form negatives and questions without using "do".
Can you help? (Do you can help? ❌)
You shouldn’t worry.
Ability in the present or in general: Can is the most common way to talk about skills and capacities. It applies both to things people have learned (skills) and to natural abilities.
I can play the guitar, but I can’t play the piano. (learned skill)
Owls can see in the dark. (natural ability)
Permission (informal, spoken English): Can is often used to allow or forbid someone to do something. It’s common in everyday contexts, though may is more formal.
You can leave early today. (permission granted)
Sorry, you can’t come in without a ticket. (permission denied)
Possibility (general, objective): Can expresses that something is possible, without necessarily referring to a specific occasion — often for things that are true sometimes or in general.
Life can be very unpredictable.
Requests and offers (informal): With can, requests and offers sound direct and friendly, but sometimes less polite than could or may.
Can you help me with this exercise? (request)
Can I carry that bag for you? (offer)
Past ability (general, not specific events): Could describes abilities people had in the past, especially during a period of time, not on one occasion.
When I was a child, I could run very fast. (general past ability)
She could read when she was four. (ability at a young age)
❌ I could pass the exam yesterday. → Wrong, because the exam is a specific occasion. Use was able to.
Polite requests and permission: Could is softer and more polite than can. It sounds more formal, careful, or respectful.
Could you open the window, please? (polite request)
Could I speak to Mr. Smith, please? (polite permission)
Possibility in the present or future (less certain than can): Could suggests that something is possible, but less definite than can.
It could rain later. (uncertain, but possible)
That could be true, though I’m not sure. (tentative opinion)
Hypothetical ability (imagined situations): Could is used in conditional sentences or when imagining abilities in unreal situations.
I could help you if you explained the problem.
General or specific ability in all tenses: Unlike can/could, be able to is flexible and can be used in any tense (present, past, perfect, future).
I am able to solve this problem. (present)
She has been able to find a job recently. (present perfect)
He will be able to attend the meeting. (future)
By next year, I’ll have been able to save enough money. (future perfect)
Specific ability in the past (when “could” doesn’t work): Could describes general ability in the past, but for one-time successful actions, was able to is the correct choice.
The fire was very strong, but they were able to escape. (they managed to do it on that occasion)
Formal/academic tone: In more formal writing, be able to often replaces can because it sounds less casual. It also allows for a wider range of tenses.
The new system will be able to handle 10,000 requests per second. (technical/formal context)
Present/general ability
I can play the piano.
Past/general ability
When I was young, I could climb trees easily.
specific ability or any tense
She was able to finish the project on time. (specific event)
Strong Obligation (internal or speaker-imposed): Must expresses a necessity that feels urgent, strong, or imposed by the speaker/authority.
You must finish your assignment before the deadline. (urgent)
You must wear a seatbelt at all times. (law/authority)
I must remember to call my grandmother. (self-imposed obligation)
Rules and Regulations (formal): Used in instructions, official documents, and notices.
Candidates must arrive at least 15 minutes early.
Strong Deduction / Logical Conclusion: Expresses certainty (present or past) when we have strong evidence.
You must be tired after such a long journey. (present deduction)
She must have forgotten our meeting. (past deduction)
External Obligation (rules, necessity outside speaker’s control): Refers to obligations coming from circumstances, rules, or external authority rather than the speaker.
I have to wear a uniform at school. (rule)
She has to submit the form by Friday. (external authority)
Everyday Necessity (neutral, less formal than must): Sounds more natural in daily conversation than must.
Sorry, I can’t stay. I have to catch the train.
For Past, Future, and Questions: Unlike must, have to works in all tenses and questions:
Past: I had to cancel my trip.
Future: You will have to show ID at the airport.
Question: Do I have to attend the meeting?
No Strong Deduction: Have to is NOT normally used for deductions.
❌ She has to be tired. → sounds like obligation, not logical conclusion.
✅ She must be tired. → deduction
Mustn’t and Don’t have to look similar, but they actually mean opposites.
Mustn't → Prohibition / strong negative obligation: It means it is not allowed / it is forbidden.
You mustn’t smoke in the hospital. (It’s against the rules)
Children mustn’t play near the road. (Strong prohibition for safety reasons)
We mustn’t forget to lock the door. (It’s essential not to forget)
Don't have to → No necessity / no obligation: It means it is not necessary, but it is still allowed.
You don’t have to wear a tie to the office — it’s optional.
We don’t have to leave yet, we have plenty of time.
She doesn’t have to cook tonight; we ordered food.
Must → internal, speaker-imposed, or very strong rule.
Have to → external necessity (rules, circumstances, facts).
Must → mostly present/future (except deduction in past).
Have to → works in all tenses (past, future, questions).
Must sounds stronger, more formal, and sometimes urgent.
Have to is neutral, more common in everyday speech.
✅ Must = strong logical conclusion.
❌ Have to ≠ deduction (confusing if used that way).
Future predictions (neutral or certain): Refers to what the speaker sees as certain or inevitable. It is also used for the 1st Conditional.
The sun will rise at 6:30 tomorrow.
Prices will increase if inflation continues.
Spontaneous decisions: When the decision is made at the moment of speaking.
I’ll answer the phone.
Don’t worry, I’ll help you with your bags.
Promises and threats: Used to show determination, insistence, or threat:
I will always love you. (promise)
You’ll regret this decision. (threat)
Orders / instructions: Especially in formal or military-like contexts, will expresses obligation in the form of an order.
You will stay here until I return.
All students will hand in their essays by Friday.
Polite requests / offers: It is more formal and softer petitions than will.
Would you like a cup of tea?
I would be happy to help.
Hypothetical or unreal situations: It is used for making hypothesis about unlikely or impossible situations - 2nd and 3rd Conditional.
If I had more time, I would travel the world.
She would have bought it if it had been cheaper.
Past habits (like "used to"): Repeated actions in the past, especially with nostalgia.
When we were kids, we would spend hours playing outside.
Every summer, they would go camping in the mountains.
Future in the past: Talking about the future from a past point of view. (Reported Speech)
He said he would call me the next day.
They promised they would send the documents.
Will → expresses real, definite actions or events (future facts, promises, orders).
If it rains, I will stay home.
Would → expresses hypothetical, imagined, or unreal situations.
It might rain later.
Will → straightforward, neutral in tone.
Will you open the window?
Would → softer, more tentative, polite.
Would you open the window?
Will → present point of view toward the future.
I will call you tomorrow.
Would → future seen from the past. (Reported speech)
He said he would call me the next day.
Suggestions and offers (mainly in questions): In British English, "shall" is often used for making offers or suggestions, particularly in a more formal or polite context.
Shall I help you with your bags?
Shall we start the meeting now?
Formal rules, contracts, and legal language: In legal or formal contexts, "shall" is often used to express obligation, indicating what is required or must be done.
All visitors shall sign in at reception.
The company shall provide training for all employees.
Formal determination or promise (literary/ceremonial): In literature or speeches, "shall" conveys authority and solemnity. It gives a sense of finality or moral determination.
You shall not pass!
Advice / recommendation: Should is used to give suggestions or recommendations in a polite but clear way.
You should see a doctor.
Light obligation / duty: Expresses what is morally right or socially expected, though not legally binding.
Employees should treat customers with respect.
Expectation / probability: Used when something is likely or expected to happen, though not guaranteed.
The train should arrive at 7.45.
Advice / recommendation: Polite suggestion, often slightly stronger than should.
You ought to back up your files regularly.
Moral duty / strong obligation: Expresses what is the right or proper thing to do, from a moral standpoint.
We ought to look after our planet.
Probability / logical expectation: Indicates that something is logically expected to be true or to happen.
This ought to be enough money.
Shall → Rare, except in formal/legal English or fixed expressions:
Shall we dance?
Should → Very frequent in both spoken and written English.
Ought to → Less frequent than should; still correct, but often sounds more formal, traditional, or British.
Shall → Not used for probability.
Should → Common for expressing what is expected:
The plan should work.
Ought to → Same meaning as should, but with a slightly more formal tone:
This ought to be enough.
Shall → Strong, binding (often external) obligation in legal or official contexts:
The tenant shall pay the rent on time.
Should → Weak obligation; expresses what is advisable or morally right, but not compulsory:
You should respect your parents.
Ought to → Similar to should, but carries a stronger moral weight:
We ought to help those in need.