In my Comparison Project for my Fall 2022 Course of my Applied Educational Neuroscience certification I chose to compare the Applied Educational Neuroscience (AEN) framework with Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). This Google Site will provide a general overview of the differences between a behaviorist approach and the pillars of applied educational neuroscience. The rest of this page includes articles, blog posts, and more discussion regarding the use of behaviorist approaches with our autistic students, as well as a video describing an alternative approach created by Dr. Ross Greene.
This episode from Affect Autism explains the "Rubber Band Metaphor" and how it is used within a DIR Floortime approach. One of the concepts discussed is the issue of compliance-based approaches, due its emphasis on discrete surface-level behaviors and skills and practicing those over and over in the "right way", rather than promoting the development of thinking which is a necessary pre-requisite to higher-level thinking, learning, and generalization, rather than rote memorization.
"Evidence is showing that learning does not happen based on compliance; learning happens through curiosity, connection, and co-regulation."
Our goals for our children should not be based on compliance and their ability to comply on demand, but based on their social/emotional development through a developmental, individual difference-based, and relational approach, as THIS is the foundation for long-term learning, thinking, and independence.
PBIS and other incentive-based systems are NOT trauma-informed. Here is a paper which critically examines PBIS, which is based in behaviorism.
The AMA pulled it's explicit support for ABA in 2023.
Source: The American Medical Association House of Delegates Handbook, pgs. 1179-1182