PWN Eligibility

Date Prior Written Notice Given to Parents: Date PWN is given to parents

• After the meeting and decisions are made

• Prior to the implementation of the decisions made in the meeting

Select: Determine what type of decision the Team/District made during the meeting

Proposes to initiate or change the areas as described below;

Refuses to initiate or change the areas as described below;

Qualifying Student:

This PWN should be given to parents prior to an IEP meeting occurring. However, in most cases the MET and IEP are done together to keep parents from having to come to school for two meetings. *Note in other factors

Make sure the PWN and MET report are sent prior to the IEP services being implemented.

*This is not State Monitoring approved*

Description of the action proposed or refused: Document all the decision that were made during the meeting.

• Drop down menu is a guide - make statements that are individual to the student

• both proposed or refused decisions by the Team/District

Based on the Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team's (MET) decision, STUDENT qualifies as a student with a Specific Learning Disability in the area of Reading.

STUDENT will continue to qualify for Speech Language services.

Explanation of why the agency proposes or refuses to take this action: Explain why the decisions were made

• Drop down menu is a guide - make statements that are individual to the student

The team determined that STUDENT met the criteria of a student with a Specific Learning Disability in the area of reading by demonstrating a significant discrepancy of -18 between ability and achievement in reading comprehension. She has struggled with reading comprehension for several years despite interventions in the general education classroom.

STUDENT continues to demonstrate articulation errors that are affecting his education and understandability in the general education classroom and with his peers.

Description of any options the agency considered: What options were also presented during the meeting, what options could the Team/District have proposed different than what was agreed or refused

• Drop down menu is a guide - make statements that are individual to the student

Reasons the above listed were rejected: Why did the Team/District reject the other options

• Drop down menu is a guide - make statements that are individual to the student

Considered:

Not qualify STUDENT was considered and rejected.

Why Rejected:

Copy from Evaluation Summary Section G

Description of each evaluation procedure, test, record, or report the agency used/will use as a basis for the proposed or refused action: List all data used to make the decision

• Drop down menu is a guide - make statements that are individual to the student

The team reviewed information provided by the parent, including medical, social, and developmental summary and history; educational history; review of previous evaluations/assessments; state and district assessments; current classroom-based academic achievement, behavioral observations, assessments, and functional performance;

Description of any other factors that are relevant to the agency's proposal or refusal: Document anything else that needs to noted regarding the student's education and parent participation.

• If parent was absent from meeting, note Team's willingness to still meeting with the parent upon their request

STUDENT'S parents were not in attendance at the MET Meeting; however, the school will seek out their input through other means such as a home visit. His parents are continually invited to participate in the process. STUDENT can not participate in special education services until his parents agree to placement.

STUDENT'S parents agreed to proceed with IEP after the Eligibility was determined and before an official PWN or MET report could be given to them.