Example Goal
The student will be able to identify appropriate solutions to social scenarios in 4 out of 5 trials across 3 sessions.
Should I or Shouldn't I is a card game targeting social problem solving skills and social expectations for teenagers. This game involves a scenario being read out to the group. Each student rates the situation on a scale called the Social Interpretation Scale from 1-5 one being a positive reaction and 5 being something that is unsafe or breaks rules. After everyone rates the scenario the SLP can lead a discussion about the scenario and the ratings the students gave it. Example questions to lead the discussion could be
How would you feel if _____ happened to you?
Why did you rate the scenario that way?
Some people might rate this scenario a ___, can you think of any reasons why they would rate it this way?
What could we do instead of this to make the scenario right?
In order to increase difficulty there are also challenge cards where a scenario is presented and the student is asked what an appropriate response would be. This opens up the group to a discussion about appropriate responses and strategies to common social situations. If the SLP knows about specific situations the student is struggling with these real life scenarios can also be discussed in the group and rated on the Social Interpretation scale. Data collection will be done via a +/- system.
The game can be purchased here
Evidence base
This activity gives the students a safe environment to practice social thinking skills (Winner, 2011). This activity makes a game out of the evidence based practice of using the social-emotional chain reaction. There are 4 steps in this chain (Crooke, 2016)
The unexpected or expected behavior
How that behavior makes other people feel
How others treat the student as a consequence of the behavior.
How the student feels
By understanding the effect their behaviors have on others and themselves students can make adjustments to their behaviors in order to maintain relationships and increase self confidence (Crooke, 2016).
References
Social thinking
Winner, M. G., & Crooke, P. J. (2011). Social Communication Strategies for adolescents with autism. The ASHA Leader, 16(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.ftr1.16012011.8
This article describes the Social Thinking framework generally.
Crooke, P.; Winner, M. Olswang, L. Thinking Socially: Teaching Social Knowledge to Foster Social Behavioral Change. Topics in Language Disorders 36(3):p 284-298, July/September 2016. | DOI: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000094
This article describes the social emotional chain reaction and evidence for its relationship with cognitive behavioral therapy and its effectiveness in the ASD population.