Overview

-The Greenland Self Government Act (GSGA) was enacted in 2009.

-The GSGA was a significant development in Greenland's ongoing pursuit of self-determination and greater autonomy. Prior to its enactment, Greenland had already made considerable progress in its quest for self-governance.

-The Act aimed to expand the autonomy of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark, reflecting the desire of the Greenlandic people to take greater control of their internal affairs.

-The GSGA applies to Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, encompassing its diverse geography and communities. 

-Greenlandic People: The GSGA primarily affected the Greenlandic people, as it was designed to grant them increased self-governance, cultural preservation, and control over their own domestic affairs.

-Danish Government: The Danish government played a central role in negotiating and enacting the GSGA, as Greenland was still part of the Kingdom of Denmark.

-Expanded Self-Government: The GSGA expanded the self-governing powers of Greenland, granting it greater control over domestic affairs, such as health, education, and natural resources. Denmark retained control over foreign affairs and defense.

-Economic Rights and Resource Management: The Act addressed economic rights, revenue-sharing arrangements, and resource management in Greenland, allowing the territory to benefit more directly from its resources.

-Cultural and Linguistic Recognition: The GSGA recognized the importance of the Inuit culture and language, emphasizing their preservation and development.

-The GSGA marked a significant step in Greenland's journey towards self-determination and increased autonomy. It granted Greenlanders more authority to make decisions about their domestic affairs and further solidified their cultural and political identity.

-The Act aimed to address historical challenges and empower the Greenlandic people to shape their future. It had a profound impact on the socio-political landscape of Greenland.

-The GSGA had both positive and challenging consequences, as it provided opportunities for self-determination while also presenting difficulties related to economic development, resource management, and governance.