After researching similar solutions and assessing their pros and cons, we developed some criteria that we would possibly include in our future design. We compared the abilities of the similar solutions to the criteria we created and the results are in the matrix below.
Criteria
Temperature Control – is capable of maintaining temperature or giving control of the temperature to the user
Tracks Water Consumption – can measure and track the amount of water the user drinks throughout the day
Desirable Flavor – affects the flavor of the water in any way that might make it more desirable for the user
Clean Water – is able to clean the water inside it so that it stays clean and is healthy for the user
Versatile Design – can be used in a variety of ways or situations that the user may encounter
Adaptive System – is capable of adapting based on the preferences and characteristics of the user
Functional System – functions as it is meant to and works as its description claims it does for the user
Durable Structure – is not going to break easily whether it is handled by the user as it should or not
Sustainable Design – is designed with materials or in a way that values sustainability and the environment
Minimal Expenses – is relatively not expensive for the user to purchase or maintain the quality of
We created criteria to rank the similar solutions based on the most important parts of creating a successful product. For example, the first criterion that we had was temperature control, which we thought was one of the most essential pieces for the product to be efficient. We gave each solution its own rating based on the criteria that we used. We used a percentage-based system to allow the information to be easier to understand for outside parties, so the higher the percentage, the better the product is.