Collaboration

Conflicting opinions about government oversight taught me a great deal about collaboration

During my time on the City of Bryan’s Planning & Zoning Commission collaborative efforts was the name of the game. We often came to unanimous decisions on variances, development plans, and many recommendations we made to council during our bi-weekly meetings. However, many times we were forced to make our stances be known, and respectfully agree to disagree. 

One such instance I stood alone on was when Council needed the Commission to make recommendations related to "Stealth Dorms." This is the name given to home developers would construct in residential neighborhoods but rent to unrelated individuals by the bedroom. Many of these homes began to infringe upon long standing communities. The commission voted to make a recommendation that would limit these "stealth dorms." I however, did not believe the issue warranted government intervention. Even though I was the lone commissioner to vote against the measure my points push Council to challenge the commission to come up with alternative solutions than the ones we originally recommended.  

In the end we did not find a need to limit "Stealth dorms," and everyone involved was able to walk away with some real time lessons on collaboration. I believe I motivated the Commission to rethink our initial approach. I also learned even as a lone wolf at time when collaborating if you can substantiate your points well enough you can elevate the thinking of everyone around you.  

One of the primary lessons I take away from my time as a commissioner is how to manage conflicting perspectives as it relates to development. From NIMBYs to big box developers, everyone believes they are right. However, with the right amount of communication and constructive collaborative efforts amicable conclusion can usually be reached and that’s the win-win.