Ed.D. Dissertation Proposal Defense Guide

The Dissertation Proposal

The oral defense of the dissertation proposal and the comprehensive examination occur simultaneously during your sixth or seventh semester. The defense/exam includes an assessment of your knowledge and skills related to the development of your dissertation.  It has both written and oral components. You are examined on:

Successfully presenting and defending your dissertation proposal and passing the comprehensive examination demonstrates readiness to proceed to candidacy, the final, dissertation phase of your program as a doctoral candidate.

All proposals defenses should be run through Adobe Sign. Your Chair should receive a copy of the results.

The Dissertation Proposal Defense Guide

Proposal Defense Guidelines:

Before Scheduling Proposal Defense:

Scheduling Proposal Defense Process

What To Do Before Your Defense

Oral Comprehensive Exams

Students must choose one of two options for their oral comprehensive exam. Students should communicate with their Chair about their chosen option, at least two weeks ahead of their proposal defense date.

The two options are: 

In both options, students are encouraged not to share the questions with other students in the program.

The Defense

Permissions to Conduct Research

As you develop your dissertation proposal and before you obtain IRB approval, obtain consent to conduct your research. To insure clarity and avoid misunderstandings, obtain the formal permission of your supervisor and others holding the keys to your success.  Although the following checklist will not apply to every situation, be sure to obtain written consent in situations that do apply.

What does your permission letter need to include? A written consent letter serves to make concrete the important aspects of your innovation and gain the support needed to make the implementation successful.  Permission letters need to clearly identify:

Why are the permissions so important?  Every year, a few doctoral students find they can not implement their projects as planned due to planning oversights.  Examples follow. Samantha’s hoped that her sixth grade team (community of practice) could meet over a common lunch period, but she failed to ask the principal or the scheduler to schedule lunch periods so all sixth grade teachers involved can meet at this time. It was too late to change the schedule when Samantha discovered this. Martha hoped to offer cognitive coaching lessons to induction year teachers, but the coordinator of the induction year training was not informed of her plan and was following a mentoring model. She was informed that the agenda was too full. Jim had ordered iPads through a teaching improvement inservice grant, but the IT director would not connect them to the school network because they were a single platform Windows school district. Jim’s project was significantly delayed until the wrangling with the IT folks could be resolved.

Think ahead.  Inform the key leaders with the critical points and obtain their written consent.

**Also remember to secure permissions for instruments you may use.

Human subjects. As a general rule doctoral students working in schools or community colleges are expected to receive approval from their employing institution’s IRB as well as ASU’s IRB.  In our program this occurs after the proposal defense. The IRB will expect to see permission letters. The signed consent forms should be attached to your IRB proposals and will also be included in an appendix of your dissertation proposals.

Formatting Your Dissertation

Formal papers submitted throughout the program and for the dissertation are to follow the style guide presented in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (latest edition). It is the candidates responsibility to prepare the dissertation manuscript in accordance to the guidelines set by Graduate Education.