Creation Study Part 2
By Mark Farquharson
I think it is hard for people to even consider the idea that the earth is only 6-7000 years old…..they think “No way, you got to be joking”….. “you can’t be serious?”… “that’s just not possible”…
Just like it’s hard for people to believe that dinosaurs and man lived at the same time… and that dinosaurs just died out recently…..
Straight away they object to the idea……………
And no you can’t tell me that Dinosaurs where extinct or almost extinct before Adam ether… saying it, does not make me believe it… and there is evidence that points to them still be around long after Adam and even after the Flood…..
And it does not prove to me that there was death before Adam sinned… there was no death…..No Animals died before Adam sinned.
How is it, there are Foot prints..:
Consider also that in 1983, researchers reported in the science and engineering news section of The Moscow News that they had discovered what appeared to be a human footprint in 150-million-year-old Jurassic rock, next to a giant, three-toed dinosaur footprint.
From http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/15
There have been loads of
MAN TRACKS, TOGETHER WITH DINOSAUR TRACKS….
http://www.omniology.com/PaluxyPrints.html
If there was Death, then what was the point in God tell Adam he would die…?? Because Adam would die, there had been death... No there had not been death, God showed Adam what death was…after Adam had sinned… then Adam understood.. that he would die…and death was past on to all mankind, and all animals….. that was the warning about eating the tree… you would die…not much of a warning if they where going to die anyway…
Dinosaur bones are not millions of years old…
We have in our possession
—on the official stationery of the University of Arizona—a copy of the test results for the Allosaurus bones (see reproduction at right, sample B). Amazingly, the oldest C-14 date assigned to those bones was a mere 16,120 years (and only 23,760 years for the Acrocanthosaurus fossils; see Dahmer, et al., 1990). Both dates are a far cry from the millions of years that evolutionists suggest should be assigned to dinosaur fossils.
From http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/15
Also check out:
http://www.omniology.com/C-14Verification.html
The above article also includes other reasons dinosaur are not that old…
And they have also find Dinosaur Tissue, this tissue is not millions of years old, it indicates only centuries….
"Evolutionist Mary H. Schweitzer of North Carolina State University has discovered flexible blood vessels inside the fossilized thighbone of a "68-70 million year old" Tyrannosaurus rex"
"Although it is too early to make definite statements regarding this stunning and wholly unexpected find, the evidence seems to indicate the T. rex fossil is—well, young. Young as in just centuries-old, certainly not an age of millions of years. Indeed, Dr. Schweitzer said, "I am quite aware that according to conventional wisdom and models of fossilization, these structures aren't supposed to be there, but there they are. I was pretty shocked.""
from http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=2033
And Ica Burial Stones, Also point to the fact that Dinosaurs and man co-existed long after the flood….
The rocks turned out to be ancient burial stones that the Inca Indians placed with their dead. Almost one-third of the stones depicted specific types of dinosaurs (such as Triceratops and Stegosaurus) and various pterosaurs. The type of art form represented by these stones, and their location, dated them to the time of the Inca Culture, c. A.D. 500-1500. How could these ancient Indians have known the anatomy of these creatures if they never had witnessed them firsthand?
From http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/15
Also check out
Dinosaurs where even around after the Flood…. There are old stories of dragons… Dragon the old name for dinosaur…
And they where even still around after the time of Christ, even as late as the late 1600’s…..
The long-tailed flying reptile Scaphognathus crassirostris is one such species that may be studied in this manner. Archaeological items and ancient written accounts enable us to understand its appearance. For comparison purposes, the two fossils of that species that have been found are examined. The archaeological artifacts are from Egypt and Europe together with written accounts. It is concluded that the S. lived until the early 17'th century, based on the early scientist Meier's sketch and other archaeological artifacts with similar morphological features that cannot be explained except by eyewitness observation of the S. This study helps to establish the recent existence of rhamphorhynchoid pterosaurs; animals that mainstream science believes became extinct about 140 million years ago.
and
A dragon was said to live in the wetlands near Rome in December, 1691. The animal lived in a cave and terrorized the local population. A sketch of the skeleton has survived in the possession of Ingegniero Cornelio Meyer
And:
Gesner, the leading German zoologist of the 16'th century, recorded that in 1543 within Germany near Stiria, serpents with wings and legs did bite and wound many men incurably
From “The Rhamphorhynchoid Pterosaur Scaphognathus crassirostris: A "Living Fossil" Until the 17th Century” http://www.rae.org/egscphrv.html
As to do with Ape to Man, you just have to look at the recent news to see home people can be wrong about old bones….:
New hominid species may be early version of Homo sapiens
In 2003, when fossil remains were uncovered in Liang Bua Cave on the Indonesian island of Flores, the discoverers dubbed the remains Homo floresiensis, a new hominid species. But in a new study, published online October 9, 2006 in The Anatomical Record, the official journal of the American Association of Anatomists, researchers suggest that the remains are, in fact, a Homo sapiens with microcephaly, an abnormally small head.
Also Jesus himself points out when humans where made:
Mark 10:
3 Yet He, answering, said to them, "What does Moses direct you?"
4 Yet they say, "Moses permits us to write a scroll of divorce, and to dismiss her."
5 And answering, Jesus said to them, "In view of your hardheartedness he writes for you this precept.
6 Yet from the beginning of creation God makes them male and female.
7 On this account a man will be leaving his father and mother and will be joined to his wife, CLV
When where humans made? In the beginning…. Not millions of years later…and it is also in the book of Matthew….
Matthew 19:3 And the Pharisees came to Him, trying Him, and saying, "Is it allowed one to dismiss his wife for every cause?"
4 Now He, answering, said, "Did you not read that the Maker from the beginning makes them male and female,
5 and He said, 'On this account a man shall be leaving father and mother and shall be joined to his wife, and the two shall be one flesh'?
6 So that no longer are they two, but one flesh. What God, then, yokes together, let not man be separating." CLV
From the beginning…
But Fish where made the day before land based animals…???
Yes they where create the day before, but that does not mean they evolve into land based animals… it does not say that anywhere…..and at that rate birds are created on the same day as fish, so why not birds evolving into land animals….??? No ?
But there is evidence? Evidence of what? Do we know who the parents where of the dead fish that has those things… or it’s off-spring? NO…. we have no clearly line… we have a dead fish and for all other appearances it looks like a fish..
Also All Animals where plant eaters to start with… they where not meat eaters….
Genesis 29 And God saith, `Lo, I have given to you every herb sowing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree in which is the fruit of a tree sowing seed, to you it is for food; 30 and to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the heavens, and to every creeping thing on the earth, in which is breath of life, every green herb is for food:' and it is so. YLT
God told Noah after the flood that they could eat animals….
Copyright © M J Farquharson 2006 revised 2008
Part 3 Here: Creation Study Part 3
Back: Creation-Recreation