1.10 Faculty Involvement

Resource: Tiered Fidelity Inventory Version 2.1

1.10 Faculty Involvement

Faculty are shown school-wide data regularly and provide input on universal foundations (e.g., expectations, acknowledgments, definitions, consequences) at least every 12 months.

Date Sources

• PBIS Self-Assessment Survey
• Informal surveys
• Staff meeting minutes
• Team meeting minutes

Scoring Criteria

0 = Faculty are not shown data at least yearly and do not provide input

1 = Faculty have been shown data more than yearly OR have provided feedback on Tier I foundations within the past 12 months but not both

2 = Faculty are shown data at least 4 times per year AND have provided feedback on Tier I practices within the past 12 months

Main Idea

Schools need active engagement of faculty to be successful with PBIS implementation and sustain the work over time.

Guiding Questions

1. Is behavioral data shared with faculty regularly?
2. Are faculty involved in establishing and reviewing goals?
3. Does data inform decisions (e.g., staff surveys, fidelity assessments, climate surveys, etc.)
4. Is faculty feedback obtained throughout the year? How?
   • Are changes made based on faculty feedback?
   • What is the feedback loop to grade level, department, and other teams in the schools about PBIS implementation?

Surface Level to meet criteria

• Is there documentation of a process for receiving feedback on Tier I supports?
• Does that documentation include input from faculty?
• Was the most recent feedback within the past 12 months?
• How often is school-wide data shared with faculty?