Actor Network Theory

Overview:

    • Actor-Network Theory (ANT) is a type of critical social theory pioneered in the 1980s by Michel Callon (1986), Bruno Latour (1987), and John Law (1987).
    • Emerging from the field of science and technology research, ANT conceptualizes social interactions in terms of networks.
    • Networks integrate the Material Environment (ex., technology) and the Semiotic Environment (ex., concepts and symbolic meanings).
    • This implies that social interactions have both Material and Human causes.

Terms:

    • Semiotics is the theory and study of communication and language in terms of signs and symbols.
    • Networks are the integration of the material and semiotic environments.
      • ANT may be seen as a type of "Material Semiotics".
      • The concept of Generalized Symmetry is the presumption that the Material and Semiotic components of networks are co-equal in importance.
      • The concept of Entelechy describes the mixing of Material and Human factors in Networks.
      • The actor does not act "on his own" but only under the influence of a complex network of Material and Semiotic influences.
      • Simultaneous Becoming:
        • Culture, society, and nature are constructed simultaneously and are in a perpetual state of becoming.
        • It is incorrect to think social causes can explain nature, or that natural science can explain the construction of culture.
        • All are part of an interactive network in constant transition.
        • Social and organizational life may be seen as an attempt to form and stabilize networks, a goal achieved only temporarily and transitionally in an unending process.
    • Actants rather than actors is a term used to stress that material causes as well as human actors may be determinants of social interactions and outcomes.
      • The concept of actants in a network also stresses the interaction between material and human factors in any process.
      • Human actors define representation of material actants, affecting how material environment interacts with actors in the network.
    • Punctualisation refers to the concept that the whole network is greater than the sum of its constituent parts.
      • As networks build, synergistic capabilities are enabled;
      • As networks fall apart, de-punctualisation refers to the collapse of networked capabilities as individual components struggle to pursue their individual goals separately.
    • Tokens are the quasi-objects created through the synergy of network punctualisation.
      • Their repeated creation strengthens and reifies the network.
      • Failure of constituent parts to perform their roles, whether material or human, and whether through incapacity or disinterest, leads to network breakdown and de-punctualisation.
    • Translation is to refer to the process of forming a network, the process occurs in 4 moments or steps:
      • (1) Problematisation, which defines the problem and the set of relevant actors who, by defining the problem and the program for dealing with it, make themselves indispensible;
      • (2) Interessement, during which the primary actor(s) recruit other actors to assume roles in the network, roles which recognize the centrality of the primary actor's own role;
      • (3) Enrolment, during which roles are defined and actors formally accept and take on these roles;
      • (4) Mobilisation, during which primary actors assume a spokesperson role for passive network actors (agents) and seek to mobilize them to action.
      • Translation involves negotiations among human actors and representatives of material actants.
        • Negotiations establish common sets of definitions and meanings for understanding the phenomena with which the network is concerned.
        • The outcome of successful negotiations is an actor-network characterized by aligned interests.
        • The degree of alignment is the degree of convergence of an actor-network.
  • Stories
      • The complex process of translation which forms a network also occasions some actors to emerge as spokespersons, articulating the views and wishes of other silent actors in the network.
      • The analysis of stories is an appropriate social science methodology for the study of articulated actor networks.
    • Negotiation in the translation process is marked by:
      • Obligatory Points of Passage (OPP) are critical network channels. often designed by the primary actor to ensure communication must pass through his or her domain. That is, through obligatory passage points the actor becomes functionally indispensible to the network.
      • Cooptation, a sub-process by which actants seek to have their individual objectives become agreed to by other actants as part of defining network objectives. Actors advance favored goals and solutions, then recruit other actors to be allies in the process of forming commitments to emerging networks.
        • Translation Model of Power is the term for viewing power as a relation emerging bottom-up rather than imposed top-down.
          • Those who hold power in principle may not hold power in practice as the latter requires the ability to define, create, and stabilize networks of actors motivated to work in conjunction to accomplish a task.
          • That is, power is seen as a consequence of convincing, enrolling, and other network-building activities.
        • Black-Boxing is a sub-process by which the network is simplified by treating subnetworks, possibly quite complex ones, as single elements in an actor-network (ex., in a scientific network, the Academy of Sciences may be black-boxed and treated as a an element represented by an actor).
        • Irreversibility is achieved by an actor-network when it is no longer possible to return to an earlier network state or to alternatives present prior to the network.
      • Network Instability. Actor-networks are in a continual state of becoming, including possible dissolution.
        • From the viewpoint of the primary actor, networks demand continual maintenance or order.
        • Amont the ongoing processes of actor-networks are challenges to the role of the primary actor, desertion, betrayal, recruitment by competing networks, and all manner of changes in the constituent elements of the network.
      • Methodology. The primary ANT method is ethnographic, based on interviews with actors.
        • Inscriptions refer to all texts and communications in all media.
        • The inscriptions are the path used by actors to gain credibility in Enrollment and Cooptation processes during translation.
        • That is, inscription is a process of creating text and communication artifacts that enhance and perpetuate the interests of an actor.

Assumptions:

    • Reification. When discussing material actants, ANT scholars must be careful not to reify objects or ascribe intentionality to material objects.
    • Equi-causality. When discussing the generalized symmetry of networks, ANT scholars must be careful not to ascribe equal causal significance to each network element, even if all are essential to achieving network synergies.
      • Because of the ethnographic and narrative presentation of case material, ANT scholarship can seem to sidestep important causal issues, focusing instead on symbolically interesting aspects of network processes.
    • Systemic rather than heroic explanation. ANT is an antidote to heroic interpretations of innovations or events, diminishing the causal role played by individual (ex., scientists with regard to inventions) and increasing the emphasis placed on their material and institutional environment.
    • Determinism. Because Actor-Network Theory diminishes the Causal Independence of the actor and increases the causal importance of the network of material and semiotic influences,
      • An extreme version of ANT would be deterministic, assuming the actor was a function of the network of material and semiotic influences.
      • ANT actually stands opposed either material (ex., economic) determinism or to "human free will" explanation of processes and events.