BQPCA Final Report
May 8, 2025
GCIT Accredited June 5, 2029/ A Grade Very Good/ Post Accreditation December 6
BQPCA Final Report
May 8, 2025
GCIT BQPCA Final Report
Quality Assurance Documentation
The site visit spans five days and is structured around meetings, observations, validations, and report finalization. Day 1 involves meetings with the management, faculty, non-academic staff, and student representatives to present and discuss institutional practices. Day 2 includes classroom observations and a guided campus tour. Day 3 is dedicated to the validation of the Institutional Self-Assessment Report (ISAR). Day 4 allows follow-up meetings and sharing of the draft Assessor’s Report, providing the institution an opportunity to submit clarifications. On Day 5, the institution receives the finalized report, and an exit meeting is conducted.
Lead Officer:
Ms. Nima Lham, Program Officer, Higher Education Quality Council, Bhutan Qualifications and Professionals Certification Authority, Ministry of Education and Skills Development
Ms. Leki Choden
BQPCA Assessors:
Dr. Sangsuree Vasupongayya, Faculty, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand (International Assessor)
Mr. Sangay Tshering, Managing Partner, Green eSolutions
Ms. Tshewang Choden Wangdi, Principal, Nazhoen Pelri School
Ms. Leki Choden, CEO, Dragon Coders Private Limited
Overall observation per standard based on the assessor’s report for GCIT:
Overall observation per standard based on the assessor’s report for GCIT:
🔍 Overall Observations – Standard-wise Summary
Standard 1: Governance, Leadership, and Management
✅ Strengths:
Vision and mission aligned with RUB, Bhutan Vision 2030, and GNH.
Autonomous and competent leadership with clear roles and structure.
Strategic plan aligns with national and institutional priorities.
⚠️ Areas for Improvement:
KPI monitoring processes not clearly observed.
Communication effectiveness needs improvement.
Vision lacks measurable timelines and broader context (e.g., national/regional goals).
Standard 2: Academic System
✅ Strengths:
Specialized, industry-relevant programs with hands-on learning.
Effective planning, delivery, and use of project-based learning.
Assessment system aligned with RUB policies.
⚠️ Areas for Improvement:
Lack of outbound credit transfer system.
Delay in assessment feedback.
Governance mechanism for ensuring policy implementation needs enhancement.
Standard 3: Human Resources
✅ Strengths:
Comprehensive HR policies with performance management and recognition.
Balanced faculty-student ratio (1:11) with qualified staff.
CPD opportunities provided via online and in-house training.
⚠️ Areas for Improvement:
No formal academic succession plan beyond leadership roles.
Ph.D.-qualified staff numbers are low.
Mentor-mentee system not yet institutionalized.
Standard 4: Research, Publications, and Linkages
✅ Strengths:
Active internal research grants (AI, blockchain).
Research committee and strategy in place.
Functional consultancy and international linkages.
⚠️ Areas for Improvement:
Low publication impact (only 3 peer-reviewed/indexed).
Research outcomes not clearly articulated.
Need to systematize international research collaboration and exchange.
Standard 5: Infrastructure and Learning Resources
✅ Strengths:
Adequate and well-zoned infrastructure.
Dedicated cybersecurity building, GPU servers, and cloud access.
Preventive and corrective maintenance in place.
⚠️ Areas for Improvement:
Weak Wi-Fi in student dorms.
Only 3 first aid kits for 19 buildings.
No emergency route signage, some leakage issues reported.
Standard 6: Student Services
✅ Strengths:
Well-defined admission processes (CTT + interview).
Student engagement through clubs, wellness, and innovation programs.
Functional SRC, student service manuals, and grievance redressal.
⚠️ Areas for Improvement:
No full-time counselor; only basic internal and external support.
Alumni system not fully updated.
Need for career coaching and life skills integration.
Standard 7: Internal Quality Assurance (IQA)
✅ Strengths:
IQA system established with monitoring and feedback collection.
Support for student startups and innovation initiatives.
GNH values and branding integrated into curriculum and campus culture.
⚠️ Areas for Improvement:
IQA culture not fully embedded in daily operations.
Lack of systematic data integration and update protocols.
Monitoring and evaluating IQA activities need reinforcement.
School of Computing
School of Interactive Design and Development
RUB References
Evidences
GCIT Sparks International Student Program. Website, Facebook
GCIT Clubs
Gyalpozhing College of Information Technology
Bhutan Qualification Professional and Certification Authority
GCIT Institutional Self-Assessment Report (ISAR) 2025-- in progress
Accreditation Application 2025
Institutional Accreditation Manual 2025
Institutional Self-Assesment Report (ISAR) Form Annexture VIII
Full Stack Curriculum and Team
AI Development and Data Science Curriculum and Team
Blockchain Development Curriculum and Team
Cybersecurity Curriculum and Team
Interactive Design and Development Curriculum and Team
Academic and Non Academic List