Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating INFORMATION
"Any education in science and engineering needs to develop students’ ability to read and produce domain-specific text. As such, every science or engineering lesson is in part a language lesson, particularly reading and producing the genres of texts that are intrinsic to science and engineering."
Introduction to Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information
Being literate in science and engineering requires the ability to read and understand their literatures. Science and engineering are ways of knowing that are represented and communicated by words, diagrams, charts, graphs, images, symbols, and mathematics. Reading, interpreting, and producing text* are fundamental practices of science in particular, and they constitute at least half of engineers’ and scientists’ total working time.
Even when students have developed grade-level-appropriate reading skills, reading in science is often challenging to students for three reasons. First, the jargon of science texts is essentially unfamiliar; together with their often extensive use of, for example, the passive voice and complex sentence structure, many find these texts inaccessible. Second, science texts must be read so as to extract information accurately. Because the precise meaning of each word or clause may be important, such texts require a mode of reading that is quite different from reading a novel or even a newspaper. Third, science texts are multimodal, using a mix of words, diagrams, charts, symbols, and mathematics to communicate. Thus understanding science texts requires much more than simply knowing the meanings of technical terms.
Communicating in written or spoken form is another fundamental practice of science; it requires scientists to describe observations precisely, clarify their thinking, and justify their arguments. Because writing is one of the primary means of communicating in the scientific community, learning how to produce scientific texts is as essential to developing an understanding of science as learning how to draw is to appreciating the skill of the visual artist. Science simply cannot advance if scientists are unable to communicate their findings clearly and persuasively. Communication occurs in a variety of formal venues, including peer-reviewed journals, books, conference presentations, and carefully constructed websites; it occurs as well through informal means, such as discussions, email messages, phone calls, and blogs. New technologies have extended communicative practices, enabling multidisciplinary collaborations across the globe that place even more emphasis on reading and writing. Increasingly, too, scientists are required to engage in dialogues with lay audiences about their work, which requires especially good communication skills.
Key Features
Obtaining information from a variety of sources (e.g., websites, online talks, magazine articles, textbook chapters, interviews)
Evaluate that information to decide if its credible, relevant, and useful to answer their questions.
Communicate information in a variety of ways, to a plethora of different audiences, and for a myriad of purposes.
What it is NOT
Interaction with scientific information as an add-on or in way that are not integrated with ongoing sensemaking in the classroom
Stand alone reports of science fact from online or print resources
A focus on decontextualized vocabulary work
K-12 Progressions for Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information
Instructional Strategies for Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information
Source: Instructional Science Leadership
Have students read a text in small groups that contains evidence and science ideas (DCIs in NGSS) about a specific topic. Ask students to underline the evidence and put a star next to the science ideas.
Explicitly remind students of the definition of scientific evidence (measurements and observations). Create a poster with this definition for students to reference in the classroom.
Provide students with two or more texts on the same topic. Ask students to compare and contrast the texts, focusing on how well the authors defend their claim. Have students decide which is the most persuasive text. Tell students they will need to explain why they think that text is most persuasive.
Do a jigsaw activity with multiple texts. Put students into groups and give each group a different text on a related topic. When students have completed reading the text, mix up the groups so one person who has read each text is in each group. Ask students to briefly summarize their text to their group.
Develop a checklist of questions can ask as they evaluate texts. For example, Does the text have a clear claim? Does the text use scientific evidence to support the claim? Does the text have enough scientific evidence to support the claim?
Watch two short videos (or listen to two podcasts) about a similar topic. Ask students to compare and contrast the different perspectives on the same topic (e.g. genetically modified food).
Learn more about Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information
Bozeman Science Video - Practice 8 - Obtaining, Evaluating and Communicating Information
Webinar: Obtaining, Evaluating and Communicating Information
Science Practices Continuum - Tool for guiding and evaluating science-practice based instruction
Instructional Resources:
Miniposters - Authentic peer review
Posterpresentation.com - Scientific poster templates
Plos One - Accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed science