In the session today we will be discussing some short texts, so in preparation please read one of the texts from each task, and be prepared to describe what it says using your own words.
Seminars are small classes where students discuss certain issues in groups. It usually follows a lecture or a reading on a particular topic, and is used to explore a topic in more detail than is possible just by one lecturer talking to the group. The key skills for students in seminars are:
Carrying out background reading and then paraphrasing and summarising other people's ideas.
Active listening. This means thinking about a particular topic while someone's talking about it.
Understanding other people's arguments and developing counter arguments.
Interacting with others and responding spontaneously.
The two themes that underpin our language course are: carrying out background reading, and forming our own views on what we've read. So a linguistic skill we need to develop is distinguishing between information we've read from other sources and conclusions that we've come to by ourselves. The UEfAP website has a useful section on language for reporting summarising and paraphrasing. Take a few minutes to read through the examples and make some notes in preparation for the next task.
For the critical discussion we also need language which allows us to interact with our peers and respond to what they've said. For example:
‘I see what you’re saying, you mean that [summarise/paraphrase]. Even so, I think...
I’m looking at [immigration] in terms of [its social] rather than [economic effects].
Even though I agree with you that [an international agreement on carbon emissions is unlikely], I still think that we should [explore the possibility].
In preparation for the session, you should have read either the text on Culture Bumps or the one on Culture Shock.
In your pairs, take turns to tell your partner about the concept you read about.
Discuss the two concepts together in light of your own experiences. Have either of you ever experienced a Culture Bump, and was it positive or negative? Have you ever felt Culture Shock? If so, how did you overcome it?
The second text you should have read is one of the four relating to Hofstede's domensions. This is a framework of 'cultural dimensions' that was proposed by Geert Hofstede back in the 1980s, originally with the intention of improving intercultural communication in business settings. The framework itself was based on data gathered from workplaces at IBM, and we're going to look at four of its criteria:
Power distance
Individualism/collectivism
Masculinity/femininity
Uncertainty avoidance
According to Hofstede, cultures can be usefully defined by where they sit on these four dimensions.
As with the previous task, when discussing the text, make sure the text window is closed so that you describe the text in your own words. Once each person has described their aspect of the dimensions, discuss the following questions as a group:
Can you apply Hofstede’s analysis to your own national culture?
If you have experience of another culture, how would you define it on the four dimensions?
Do you think this analysis helps different cultures understand each other better?
Do you have any criticism of this model?
It should always be the responsibility of the immigrant, expatriate or visitor to understand and adapt to his or her new culture. Discuss.