Read the two texts below. Both texts summarise existing work on the same topic, but which one is a better literature review and why?
(Hint: the reason is not Text 2 'because it's longer')
The Vikings inhabited modern day Scandinavia (Murray 2011). The Vikings were extremely violent and attacked Lindisfarne (Williams, 2012). Nadal (2013) says that they were not that violent, and were more interested in trade. Konta (2014) thinks they were actually quite violent. Osaka (2015) states that they were quite good at building boats and sailing. Nishikori (2016) points out that they were the first Europeans to reach the Americas.
There is some disagreement among academics as to the true nature and identity of the Vikings, the inhabitants of modern day Scandinavia (Murray, 2011). Although they have been traditionally associated with violent attacks on communities such as Lindisfarne (Williams, 2012; Konta, 2014), Nadal (2013) argues that in fact they were merchants primarily. Osaka (2015) takes a similar position, claiming that the Viking people's contribution to boat building and navigation should take historical precedence. An example of their success in this area is the fact that they were the first Europeans to make contact with the Americas (Nishikori, 2016). In light of this evidence, it can be seen that the Vikings had many different aspects to their identity.
The following text is an example of a literature review of the texts that we looked at in week six on the use of public space in cities. Read through and identify the following:
The issue of housing has received increasing attention in the UK over recent years. On the one hand there is a shortage of housing, which means that young people particularly are finding it almost impossible to find somewhere affordable to live. At the same time, however, there is an increasing awareness of the need to protect our natural environmental resources such as parks and forests.
In 2015, Walker reported research which brought together 500 different studies from 17 countries. The research found that cities that promoted active living and invested in infrastructure for walking and cycling brought £13 worth of benefits for every £1 invested. In other words, green spaces and parkland help residents become more active and productive, which in turn lowers stress levels and healthcare costs and therefore boosts the economy. This suggests that any housing development that takes place should not be done at the expense of nature and parks, because this would have detrimental effects on the economy.
The conclusions reported by Walker are supported by Jones (2015), who criticises the UK government for cutting spending on parks and outdoor areas. He also points out not just the economic benefits, but the social ones too of reserving city space for residents to walk, cycle and spend time outdoors. Jones’ article contains more opinion than Walker’s, and the author’s stance on the government and specific politicians and their policies is very clear. However, although the language of the article is not neutral, it is supported by some of the same studies cited by Walker, so it is a useful discussion of some of the issues at stake.
Although the points raised by Walker and Jones highlight the importance of preserving and maintaining green spaces, Turner and Townsend (2015) report figures from a YouGov poll which shows similar dangers of not addressing the supply of housing in cities. The authors focus mainly on London, where they found that 70% of people aged 25-39 found it difficult to afford paying their rent or mortgage. They fear that this could lead to many young professionals looking for work elsewhere, even if it means taking a lower salary. The article highlights that 49% of people who were surveyed said they would leave the city if house prices continued to rise at the same rate, and that 38% of businesses are worried about the situation. The problem is primarily due to a shortage of housing, so this presents an argument for allocating more city space to housing projects at the cost of some parkland and outdoor social areas. However, a relevant point is that Turner and Townsend are a commercial organisation and are involved in construction. This means that although the points they raise are valid, they are not entirely impartial because it is in their interests to convince people to build more houses.
Overall, these three sources provide useful information for the rest of the essay. However, it would be helpful to continue to read around the topic and identify further arguments relating to how city space could best be used to help residents.
How do you get all of this into a paragraph?
Hmm, I see houses, but no green...
Refer back to the source texts from week six and identify the original language for the following paraphrases (this will be easier if you work in pairs, with the original texts on one person's screen and this page on the other's):
Writing summaries of other people's work is one of the most important skills you need to develop in order to do well in university. To use your own words demonstrates that you understand the texts that you're summarising; however, this by itself is not sufficient. You need to continue to work on the ideas of cohesion that we looked at in week five and week six in order to show how the texts you've read connect to each other. Finally, the reader needs to be clear about what ideas have been paraphrased from other people, and what ideas are your own original thoughts.
The independent study activities below focus on linking adverbs that we can use to connect ideas together and show whether they support or contradict each other.
The examples below are adverbs that we use to introduce information, and to provide a connection to the previous sentence. Sometimes these words can be interchangeable, other times they have quite specific meanings. In other words, these adverbs can overlap in meaning occasionally which can make them quite confusing to use correctly. Very often they are used as the first word in a sentence and are followed immediately by a comma. The following are all usually used to talk about slightly different types of contrasts.
Nevertheless/nonetheless
We use this adverb to introduce a statement which contrasts with evidence in the previous sentence or clause.
These adverbs can often have a similar meaning to: “Despite these facts...”, “Even so...”.
On the other hand
This adverb is used to discuss the alternative properties of the second of two items.
It can also be used to highlight alternative viewpoints.
In this last example, ‘on the other hand’ is synonymous with ‘nevertheless’ and ‘however’.
A common ‘error’ for learners is to use the following cohesive devices synonymously with the contrast adverbs above. However, they don’t indicate a contrast or a change in topic. They signal a continuation in the topic, and also introduce a surprising twist or interesting fact, of which the reader was probably not aware.
On the contrary/Indeed
'On the contrary' is used to join two clauses; the first usually contains a negative (e.g. not or never), and the second has a positive grammar structure, but with a stronger adjective which reinforces the negative stance of the first clause. Notice that the topic of both clauses is consistent.
In all the examples above, ‘indeed’ is also acceptable.
In fact/Indeed
In fact is similar to 'on the contrary' as it is used for emphasis. But it is more versatile, it doesn't need to be preceded by a negative.
Sometimes though, 'in fact' is just used to emphasise that something might be surprising or outside of common knowledge.
Please remember that these are just a few simple examples in the context of academic English. If you read and hear more conversational English you will come across many different uses of 'In fact', and you will hardly ever find anyone using ‘indeed’ or ‘on the contrary’ to introduce a statement.
Take a look at the examples below; try to find the most appropriate linking phrase to join the two clauses.
I don’t hate listening to classical music, on the contrary,
There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that a Mediterranean diet can help protect from the harmful effects of cigarette smoke. In fact,
High levels of unemployment and a lack of economic growth can make post-graduate job hunting a daunting process. Nevertheless,
Iceland is becoming more popular with tourists due to its stunning natural beauty and sense of seclusion. On the other hand,