Intuitive + high F
The most common mistake I've seen is people trying to strictly correlate PY with other systems (like saying that Intuitives can't be high F, which is actually a false statement - just look at IEI FELV, ILI xxEV and ILE FLEV). While there are definitely some obvious correlations, they're not that strict to the point you would cancel combinations that are actually perfectly possible, since types in Psychosophy can be pretty inflexible and making the system even more rigid will make it impossible to type yourself in it.
Obviously, each individual is different from the other, so different people would relate to the same aspects for different reasons. I will use Sociotypes for my examples, since they give a good picture of how your aspects in PY might manifest themselves differently depending on the Sociotype/etc., even if we’re talking about the same function.
High Physics =/= Si/Se.
High F doesn't cancel Intuition, since material world in Psychosophy is a pretty broad term. It’s not only about your “physical senses”, it takes everything related to material world, including money, possession of your territory, avarice of your possessions, just a personal sense of comfort, etc. Types like SP5 and SP7 are stereotypically high F, but at the same time these types match best with LII, ILI, ILE and LIE.
example with 1F
1) Since this Physics is Result-oriented (along with 4F), in many cases it doesn’t manifest itself as being mobile, but on the contrary - it’s very lazy and isn't prone to making any unnecessary movements (unlike 2F & 3F who are more dynamic).
2) 1F is described as being good with money, but also very economical and prudent.
“In any case, any 1F is a complete materialist, better than anyone who knows his own benefits and the price of money.”
1F (unlike 2F) generally is very stringy with their possessions, money, any of their objects, their home, etc. & attached to their personal space.
3) Due to high self-confidence in their own Physics 1F can be non-caring towards their looks and even neglect their hygiene (especially with 4V).
Now, a lot of these traits are highly matching with, let’s say, SP5, and none of them are contradictory with Intuition - so it makes combinations like INTX ILI SP5 FLEV completely possible (in fact, high F fits just great with Gamma NT’s materialism). While ILI’s 1F might manifest itself somehow like that (in theory), SLI’s 1F might be much more hedonistic and more sensory.
I would even say that FLEV is one of the most common types for SP5 ILI - an extreme example, but imagine a stereotypical shut-in with an attachment to their comfort zone (their room, perhaps).
example with 2f
ESE 2F is going to be the stereotypical “I want to make everyone feel comfortable in the environment!” type of person, SLE 2F would be stereotypically physically aggressive, while LIE’s 2F would manifest itself as the “hard-worker” (official namesake for 2F in PY) and someone's who is very good with finances.
“2F knows the value of money, knows how and loves to earn it, ready for endless accumulation. However, he is not a Shylock or a Gobseck to languish over gold. The mercantilism of the 2F is not so much Result-oriented as it’s Process-oriented, so its self-interest does not reach a pathological, tragic tear, but has the character of healthy enthusiasm, even in a rather specific field of activity.”
“A special talent of the 2nd Physics is to make, as we say, “a candy out of shit.” The 2F is economical, nothing is lost in its economy and at the same time nothing is a dead weight, even a very worn-out thing eventually finds its use, often quite far from the original.”
The last example is especially fitting for LIE, because they’re very good at making even any seemingly useless thing into a useful one (Te-base + Ne-demonstrative), + general high activity level of Process-oriented Physics fits LIEs, who are often described as being pretty active in movements and living an active lifestyle.
So, don’t be afraid to consider high Physics for yourself even if you’re an Intuitive type, and vice-versa (especially considering that you have to fully type yourself somehow anyway), and experimenting like that with other aspects too, if they somehow make more sense to you personally.
Likewise for a Sensing type with low F. (Example: LSI LVEF. It makes perfect sense for LSIs to have 1L, high Volition, and 3E. The 4th function is as fearless as the 2nd and can be used as means to an end, so it pretty much fits, if the other aspects, i.e. Logic, Volition and Emotion, are overall more valued to the individual than Physics (doesn't matter if it's strong or not), making Physics to be placed on the last place in the mental hierarchy of values.)
In the end I would say that it’s better to look at the individual & find what fits them the most, separately from other theories, rather than guess what combinations are impossible, at least in my personal opinion, since theoretical combinations don't always match how it is in practice.
And read the book, if you didn't.
(Also, interesting info dump: 90% of russian typology forums treat Socionics as a theory about how you perceive and process information (since Model A is about Information Metabolism), and treat Psychosophy as a theory about your personal values and behavior, or a subtyping system for Socionics, that makes all Psychosophy/Socionics combinations possible. Fun. I imagine SEI 4F to be a more abstract Jungian IS than a stereotypical Sensing type, like Kazuha from Genshin Impact in my opinion.)