Comparative study Assessment

Marking criteria

A: Identification and analysis of formal qualities   -  6 points 

• an informed identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the selected artworks, objects and artifacts.

At the highest level of achievement, the work provides a consistent, insightful and informed identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the selected pieces.

B: Analysis and understanding of function and purpose  -  6 points 

• an informed analysis and understanding of the function and purpose of the selected artworks, objects and artifacts within the cultural context in which they were created.

At the highest level of achievement, the work provides a consistent, insightful and informed analysis and demonstrates thorough understanding of the function and purpose of the selected pieces from at least two contrasting cultural contexts.

C: Analysis and evaluation of cultural significance  - 6 points 

• an informed analysis and understanding of the cultural significance of the selected artworks, objects and artifacts within the specific context in which they were created (such as the cultural, sociopolitical and historical significance of the works, with respect to the original audience and purpose, as well as to a contemporary audience).

At the highest level of achievement, the work provides a consistently insightful and informed analysis and thorough evaluation of the material, conceptual and cultural significance of the selected pieces from at least two contrasting cultural contexts.

D: Making comparisons and connections  - 6 points 

• an effective critical analysis and discussion of the connections, similarities and differences between the selected artworks, objects and artifacts.

At the highest level of achievement, the work critically analyses and discusses the connections, similarities and differences between the selected pieces. These connections are logical and coherent, showing a thorough understanding of how the pieces compare and contrast.

E: Presentation and subject-specific language -  6 points 

• information that is conveyed clearly and coherently in a visually appropriate and legible manner, supported by the consistent use of appropriate subject-specific language.

At the highest level of achievement, the work clearly and coherently conveys information which results in a visually creative and legible study that enhances the impact of the work and the reader's understanding. Subject-specific language is used accurately and appropriately throughout.

F: Making connections to own art-making practice (HL only)  - 12 points

• an analysis and evaluation of the outcomes of the comparative study investigation and how this has influenced your own development as an artist, identifying connections between one or more of the selected works and your own art-making processes and practices.

At the highest level of achievement, the work provides a consistent and insightful evaluation on the outcomes of the investigation. The student effectively analyses and evaluates the extent to which their own art-making and pieces have been influenced by artworks, objects and artifacts examined in the comparative study, making informed and meaningful connections throughout.