Rector’s directive on current evaluation cycle (technical parameters of evaluation) is to be issued

Board and Expert Panels are to be appointed

a round discussion table for academic public is to be convened

evaluation information system is to be made accessible to all parcicipating in evaluation

are to be established

are to commence their operations

evaluation coordinators are to be appointed

proposals on panel members, reviewers and benchmark institutions are to be submitted

formal meeting of Vice-Deans is to take place on February 7th

evaluation coordinators are to attend an evalution information system tutorial

is to issue academic parameters of the evaluation based on preliminary values of indicators and proposals of the assessed units (by April 11th)

are to agree on detailed criteria for reviewing research outputs and assessing fields and research areas

are to select examples of outputs its quality corresponds to the individual grades of the scale (for each research area)

are to begin drafting the Self-Evaluating Report (should be submitted by January 16th 2020)

are to ensure assignment of researchers to the respective research fields (by July 12th)

are to select research outputs for peer review (by July 12th)

are to check the factual correctness of research indicators and data to be used as the basis for producing bibliometric reports (by August 8th)

is to provide the bibliometric analysis (by March 31st)

are to ensure the course of peer review and prepare its outcomes (by March 31st)

are to complete drafting of the Self-evaluation report and upload it into the evaluation information system after being discussed by the Research Board of the corresponding unit (by March 31st)