Students who may be considered for special education under the Emotional or Behavioral Disorders (EBD) category need specialized services for emotional or behavioral supports for a wide range of complex and challenging emotional or behavioral conditions. Medical, biological and psychological conditions as well as genetic dispositions can affect these students' ability to learn and function in school.
Functional Behavior Assessments (FBAs) use interviews, observations, and record review to gather data on behaviors, antecedents, setting events, and consequences in order to systematically identify the function of an undesired behavior.
(d) A school district may conduct a functional behavior assessment as defined in Minnesota Rules, part 3525.0210, subpart 22, as a stand-alone evaluation without conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the student in accordance with prior written notice provisions in section 125A.091, subdivision 3a. A parent or guardian may request that a school district conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the parent's or guardian's student.
Functional behavioral assessment or FBA. "Functional behavioral assessment" or "FBA" means a process for gathering information to maximize the efficiency of behavioral supports. An FBA includes a description of problem behaviors and the identification of events, times, and situations that predict the occurrence and nonoccurrence of the behavior. An FBA also identifies the antecedents, consequences, and reinforcers that maintain the behavior, the possible functions of the behavior, and possible positive alternative behaviors. An FBA includes a variety of data collection methods and sources that facilitate the development of hypotheses and summary statements regarding behavioral patterns.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This section applies to functional behavior assessments conducted on or after July, 1, 2020.
Functional Behavior Assessment: Teacher Interview: Gathers information on primary behaviors of concern, antecedents, possible functions, possible replacement behaviors, and typical consequences.
Functional Assessment Screening Tool (FAST): This tool can be used in tandem with other methods to help identify a potential hypothesis. It is best used to support a hypothesized function identified through descriptive or other forms of assessment.
Functional Behavior Assessment: Parent Interview: Gathers information on behavior(s) of concern, antecedents, consequences, strengths/interests, and the student's attitude about school.
Functional Behavior Assessment: Student Interview: Gathers information on strengths/motivators, behavior(s) of concern, antecedents, possible interventions, and school perception.
Student Reinforcement Checklist: Through a mix of closed and open-ended items, gather information about what incentives a student would be interested in earning at school.
Forced-Choice Reinforcement Menu: Gathers information on incentive preferences through "forced-choice" items, which present the student with two items at a time and ask them to select the more preferred item. This type of interview is useful for students who endorse no or few items on a checklist-style reinforcement menu and for ascertaining the student's degree of preference for items.
ABC
This method involves recording the environmental variables related to undesired behavior(s). When the behavior of interest occurs, the observer records the target behavior, the antecedent (event that immediately preceded the behavior), and the consequence (event that immediately followed the behavior). This kind of data is necessary to identify a potential hypothesis. It is best ABC data along with a minimum of one other method below when assessing the function of undesired behavior.
Because it requires the observer to record multiple variables, it may require more time and effort to record every instance of behavior, especially high frequency behaviors. The ABC narrative method only documents correlation relationships between the undesired behavior(s) and observed antecedents and consequences, and the team must then consider these correlations and hypothesize the function of the undesired behavior(s).
Throwing items, inappropriate comments to peers, leaving one’s seat, hitting or other forms of aggression, walking out of class without permission, and refusal to follow instructions.
ABC Narrative Observation Form
The team should look for patterns regarding the antecedents that immediately precede undesired behavior(s) and the consequences that occur following undesired behaviors. The former is helpful to selecting appropriate prevention strategies and the latter is helpful to pinpointing the function of the undesired behavior and selecting appropriate response strategies that will extinguish reinforcement.
This method documents the length of a behavior by recording the time the behavior begins and ends. Use this method if your primary concern is the length of time the student engages in the behavior and the behavior has a clear beginning and end. Do not use this method if the behavior occurs with high frequency or the behavior starts and stops rapidly.
It can sometimes be difficult to accurately record the exact duration of the behavior. On the other hand, duration recording not only tells us how long the student engages in the behavior, but it automatically provides us with how many times the behavior occurred.
Out of seat behavior, tantrums
Duration can be summarized two different ways:
Percentage of observation with behavior: Sum the total number of min/sec/hrs that the behavior occurred during the observation, divide the sum by the total number of min/sec/hrs of the observation, and multiply by 100.
Average duration of behavior: Sum the total duration and divide by the total occurrences.
These methods involve counting the number of times a behavior occurs in a specific time period. Use these methods if the behavior can be easily counted and the behavior has a clear beginning and end. Do not use these methods if the behavior is occurring at such a high rate that an accurate count is impossible (e.g., pencil tapping) or the behavior occurs for extended periods of time (e.g., 2 tantrums, but the duration of each tantrum is one hour).
A frequency measure should be used only when the length of observation time is consistent from day to day (e.g., always 2 hours). A rate measure should be used if the length of observation time varies from day to day (e.g., 60 minutes of Monday, 300 minutes on Tuesday).
Leaving one’s seat, hitting another peer, throwing items, yelling out an answer, and being late to class.
Frequency/Rate Observation Form
Frequency: At the end of the observation period, total the number of occurrences. For example, Anna left her seat 5 times during 7th period.
Rate: Count the number of times the behavior occurred in the time observed. Divide that count by the length of time the behavior was observed. For example, if Anna kicked a peer 30 times in a 10 minute observation, the rate would be 3 kicks per minute (30 kicks ÷ 10 minutes = 3 kicks per minute).
The observer divides the observation period into a number of smaller intervals, observes the student constantly, and then records whether the behavior occurred at any point during the interval. This method is useful for understanding how behaviors are distributed across an observation. Use this method if the behavior occurs at a high frequency or if the behavior occurs continuously. Do not use this method if the behavior is a low frequency behavior.
Interval recording often takes less time and effort, especially if the behavior occurs at a high frequency, because the observer records the behavior only once during the interval, regardless of how many times the behavior occurs. However, interval recording only provides an estimate of the actual number of times that a behavior occurs. If the intervals are too long (e.g., 1 hour), the results can overestimate the frequency of behavior. The shorter the interval, the more accurate representation of how often the behavior is occurring.
Crying, tantrums, talking with peers, off-task behavior
Partial Interval Observation Form
When using interval recording, the level of the behavior is reported as the percentage of intervals in which the behavior occurred. To calculate the % of intervals, count the number of intervals in which the behavior was recorded, divide by the total number of intervals during the observation period and multiply by 100.
The observer divides the observation period into several smaller intervals, these can range anywhere from a few seconds to a few minutes. The staff do not need to observe the student constantly, instead, they only observe the student at the end of each interval. At this time the observer indicates whether or not the behavior was occurring at that specific time. The behavior could have been occurring during the entire interval and stopped right when the interval was ending, in this case, the observer would indicate the behavior was not present. This is a great tool to help measure on/off-task behavior.
Another option is to utilize a method referred to as Placheck. This method, like a momentary time sample, looks not only at the behavior of the target student but also the behavior of peers in the room. This method can help identify whether or not a behavior is socially significant or not. In many cases, the students we are observing are engaging in the behavior at the same rate or less than their neuro-typical peers. In situations like this, the behavior being observed may not be socially significant. The opposite is true too, in cases when the student being observed is engaging in behaviors at much higher rates/intervals than their peers.
Interval recording often takes less time and effort, especially if the behavior occurs at a high frequency, because the observer records the behavior only once during the interval, regardless of how many times the behavior occurs. However, interval recording only provides an estimate of the actual number of times that a behavior occurs.
Crying, tantrums, talking with peers, off-task behavior
When using interval recording, the level of the behavior is reported as the percentage of intervals in which the behavior occurred. To calculate the % of intervals, count the number of intervals in which the behavior was recorded, divide by the total number of intervals during the observation period and multiply by 100.
In 2011 the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) convened a restrictive procedures work group tasked with creating a statewide plan to reduce the use of restrictive procedures and eliminate the use of prone restraint. The stakeholders reached consensus on goal recommendations which can be found in Appendix A of MDE's 2015 Restrictive Procedures Legislative Report.
As set out in Goal 2C of the statewide plan, MDE contracted with an outside vendor to develop three online training modules for statewide use that provide positive strategies for school staff to use with students with disabilities. These stand-alone modules and reference documents are designed for districts to use in independent staff training.
Each training module is comprised of four parts: Welcome, Digging Deeper, Application to Practice and Using What You have Learned.
Module 2: Emotional Behavioral Disorders – Welcome
Module 2: Emotional Behavioral Disorders - Digging Deeper
Module 2: Emotional Behavioral Disorders - Application to Practice
Module 2: Emotional Behavioral Disorders - Using What You Have Learned
Module 2: Emotional Behavior Disorders - Classroom Information
Module 2: Emotional Behavior Disorders - Guidance
Module 2: Emotional Behavior Disorders - Research Brief