ChesBay Ecosystem Research

Agricultural pesticides and selected degradation products in five tidal regions and the mainstem of Chesapeake Bay - McConnell L., C. Rice, C. Hapeman, L. Drakeford, J. Harman-Fetcho, K. Bialek, M.H. Fulton, A.K. Leight, and G. Allen.. 2007. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26: 2567–2578

Aphanomyces as a cause of ulcerative skin lesions of menhaden from Chesapeake Bay tributaries - Blazer, V.S., W.K. Vogelbein, C.L. Densmore, E.B. May, J.H. Lilley, and D.E. Zwerner. 1999. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 11:340-349.

Are neutral chloroacetamide herbicide degradates of potential concern? Analysis and occurrence in the upper Chesapeake Bay - Hladik, N.L., J.J. Hsiao, and A.L. Roberts. 2005. Environmental Science and Technology 39:6561–6574.

Assessment of Chemical Contaminants in the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1994.  NOAA, NOS, National Status and Trends Program. Silver Spring, MD.

Characterization of Toxic Impacts on Living Marine Resources in Tidal Rivers of the Chesapeake Bay - Fulton, M.H., J.L. Hyland, P.B. Key, E.F. Wirth, L. Balthis, C. Cooksey, K. Chung and A.K. Leight. 2007. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 64. 80 pages

Chemical and toxicological characterization of the Lower Mobjack Bay, York River, Virginia segment of the Chesapeake Bay - Roberts, M.H. Jr., M.A. Richards, and P.F. DeLisle. 2003.  Final report to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

Chemical and toxicological characterization of the upper York River, Virginia. The Mattaponi and Pamunkey Rivers - Roberts, M.H. Jr., M.A. Richards, and P.F. DeLisle. 2004.  Final report to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

Chemical and toxicological characterization of tidal freshwater areas in the James River, Virginia between Jordan Point and Richmond - Roberts, M.H. Jr., M.A. Vogelbein, M.A. Richards, L. Seivard, and P.F. DeLisle. 2002. Final report to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality.

Chesapeake Bay Basin Toxics Loading and Release Inventory - CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 1999. Chesapeake Bay Basin Toxics Loading and Release Inventory. Annapolis, MD.

Crop Pollination Exposes Honey Bees to Pesticides Which Alters Their Susceptibility to the Gut Pathogen Nosema ceranae - While fungicides are typically seen as fairly safe for honey bees, we found an increased probability of Nosema infection in bees that consumed pollen with a higher fungicide load. Our results highlight a need for research on sub-lethal effects of fungicides and other chemicals that bees placed in an agricultural setting are exposed to. S. Pettis, Elinor M. Lichtenberg, Michael Andree, Jennie Stitzinger, Robyn Rose, Dennis vanEngelsdorp

Effects of contaminants on birds. In: Habitat Requirements for Chesapeake Bay Living Resources - Heinz, G.H., and S.N. Wiemeyer. 1991.  Second Edition, S.L. Funderburk, J.A. Mihursky, S.J. Jordan and D. Riley, editors, Chesapeake Bay Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Annapolis, MD. Pages 23-1 to 23-9.

Endocrine disrupter--estradiol--in Chesapeake Bay tributaries - Dorabawila, N, and G. Gupta. 2005.  Journal of Hazardous Materials 11:67-71

Environmental factors affecting the levels of legacy pesticides in the airshed of Delaware and Chesapeake Bays, USA - Goel, A., L.L McConnell, A. Torrents, Z. Kuang, C.J. Hapeman, D.W. Meritt, S.T. Alexander, J.R. Scudlark, and R. Scarborough. 2010.  Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29:1893-1906

Factors affecting spatial and temporal variability in nutrient and pesticide concentrations in the surficial aquifer on the Delmarva Peninsula - Debrewer, L.M., S.W. Ator, S.W., and J.M. Denver. 2007.  U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5257, 44 p.

Historical contamination of the Anacostia River, Washington, DC. - Velinsky, D.J., G.F. Riedle, J.T.F. Ashley, and J.C. Cornwell. 2011.  Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 183:307-328

Hydrologic and geochemical controls on pesticide and nutrient transport to two streams on the Delmarva Peninsula - Ator, S.W., J.M. Denver, and M.J. Brayton. 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5051, 34 p.

Impacts of Conservation Adoption on Cultivated Acres of Cropland in the Chesapeake Bay Region, 2003-06 to 2011 - On December 5, 2013, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack announced the release of the CEAP-Cropland report on the effects of recently installed conservation practices on cropland in the Chesapeake Bay region. This new report, using data collected in 2003-06 and 2011, demonstrates that during the time between the two surveys, agricultural producers have significantly increased their use of an array of conservation measures to improve and protect water and soil quality in the Chesapeake Bay region. These conservation practices are generating substantial natural resource benefits for producers and the communities of the Chesapeake Bay region.

Interim assessment of yellow perch Perca flavescens habitat and population dynamics in Severn River, a suburbanized Chesapeake Bay sub-estuary - Uphoff, J., M. McGinty, B. Richardson, P. Piavis, H. Speir, and M.F. Topolski. 2005. Fisheries Tech. Rep. Series, Number 46. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Service, Stevensville, MD

Intersex (testicular oocytes) in smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu from the Potomac River and selected nearby drainages - Blazer, V.S., L.R. Iwanowicz, D.D. Iwanowicz, D.R. Smith, J.A. Young, J.D. Hedrick, S.W. Foster, and S.J. Reeser. 2007. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 19:242-253.

Investigation of Organic Chemicals Potentially Responsible for Mortality and Intersex in Fish of the North Fork of the Shenandoah River, Virginia, during Spring of 2007 - Alvarez, D.A., Cranor, W.L., Perkins, S.D., Schroeder, V.L., Werner, S.L., Furlong, E.T., and Holmes, J., 2008,  U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1093, 16 p. 

Magnitude and extent of contaminated sediment and toxicity in Chesapeake Bay - Hartwell, S.I and J. Hameedi. 2007.  NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 47, Silver Spring, MD

Mortality of centrarchid fishes in the Potomac drainage - Survey results and overview of potential contributing factors - Blazer, V.S., L.R. Iwanowicz, C.E. Starliper, D.D. Iwanowicz, P. Barbash, J.D. Hedrick, S.J. Reeser, J.E. Mullican, J.D. Zaugg, M.R. Burkhardt, and J. Kelble. 2010. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 22:190-218.

Occurrence of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Pennsylvania Waters, 2006-09 - Webinar held on 7/25/13 Ms. Rhonda Manning, Water Program Specialist PA Department of Environmental Protection, Mr. Andrew Reif, Water-Quality Biologist U.S. Geological Survey

Occurrence of Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and Organic Wastewater Compounds in Pennsylvania Waters, 2006–09 - Far fewer numbers of contaminants of emerging concern were detected at the fish-health sites than at the wastewater-effluent-discharge sites. Most of the fish-health sites were not located directly downstream from a wastewater-effluent discharge, but there were multiple wastewater-effluent discharges in the drainage basins upstream from the sampling sites. No distinct pattern of contaminant occurrence could be discerned for the fish-health stream sites. Andrew G. Reif, J. Kent Crawford, Connie A. Loper, Arianne Proctor, Rhonda Manning, and Robert Titler

ontaminant exposure and reproductive success of ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) nesting in Chesapeake Bay regions of concern - Rattner, B.A., P.C. McGowan, N.H. Golden, J.S. Hatfield, P.C. Toschik, R.F. Lukei Jr., R.C. Hale, I. Schmitz-Afonso, and C.P. Rice. 2004. C. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 47:126-140.

Organochlorine contaminant exposure and reproductive success of black-crowned night-herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) nesting in Baltimore Harbor, Maryland - Rattner, B.A., P.C. McGowan, J.S. Hatfield, C.-S. Hong, and S.G. Chu. 2001.  Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 41:73-82.

Organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, dioxins, and metals in post-term peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) eggs from the middle Atlantic states, 1993-1999 - Clark, K.E., Y. Yhao, and C.N. Kane. 2009. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 57:174-184.

Organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, Dioxins and metals in post-term peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) eggs from the Mid-Atlantic states - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Y. Zhao, and K.E. Clark. 2004. New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland , and Virginia – 1993-1999. USFWS, Washington Office Project ID: 985000.1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Virginia Field Office, Gloucester, VA. 42 pages

Pollutant fate and spatiotemporal variability in the Choptank River estuary: Factors influencing water quality. - Whitall, D. W. D. Hively, A. K. Leight, C. J. Hapeman, L. L. McConnell, T. Fisher, C. P. Rice, E. Codling, G. W. McCarty, A. M. Sadeghi, A. Gustafson, and K. Bialek. 2010.  Science of the Total Environment 408:2096-2108.

Relating nutrient and herbicide fate with landscape features and characteristics of 15 subwatersheds in the Choptank River watershed - Hively, W.D., C.J. Hapeman, L.L. McConnell, T.R. Fisher, C.P. Rice, G.W. McCarty, A.M. Sadeghi, D.R. Whitall, P.M. Downey, G.T. Niño de Guzmán, K. Bialek-Kalinski, M.W. Lang, A.B. Gustafson, A.J. Sutton, K.A. Sefton, and J.A. Harman Fetcho. 2011.  Science of the Total Environment 409:3866–3878.

Reproductive endocrine disruption in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) in the Potomac River Basin- Spatial and temporal comparisons of biological effects. - Blazer, V.S., L.R. Iwanowicz, H. Henderson, P.M. Mazik, J.A. Jenkins, D.A. Alvarez, and J.A. Young. 2012.  Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184:4309-4334.

Reproductive health of bass in the Potomac, USA drainage - Alvarez, D.A., W.L. Cranor, S.D. Perkins, V. Schroeder, L.R. Iwanowicz, R.C. Clark, C.P. Guy, A.E. Pinkney, and V.S. Blazer. 2009.  Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28:1084-1095. 

Reproductive health of bass in the Potomac, USA drainage: Part 1. Exploring the effects of proximity to wastewater treatment plant discharge. - Iwanowicz, L.R., V.S. Blazer, C.P. Guy, A.E. Pinkney, J. Mullican, and D.A. Alvarez..2009b. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 28:1072-1083.

Reproductive health of yellow perch Perca flavescens in selected tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay. - Blazer, V.S., A.E. Pinkney, J. A. Jenkins, L. R. Iwanowicz, S. Minkkinen, R. O. Draugelis-Dale, and J.H. Uphoff (in press). Science of the Total Environment.

Synthesis of U.S. Geological Survey science for the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem and implication for environmental management - Phillips, S.W. (editor). 2007. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1316, 72 pages.

Targeting toxics: A characterization report. A tool for directing management and monitoring actions in the Chesapeake Bay’s tidal rivers - USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD. EPA 903-R-99-010.

Temporal trends in nitrate and selected pesticides in Mid-Atlantic ground water. - Debrewer, L.M., S.W. Ator, and J.M. Denver. 2008. Journal of Environmental Quality 37:S296-S308.

The2010 Integrated Report of Surface Water Quality in Maryland - MDE (Maryland Department of the Environment). 2010.  Baltimore, MD.

The relationship of Irgarol and its major metabolite to resident phytoplankton communities in a Maryland marina, river and reference area - Hall, L.W. Jr., R.D. Anderson, W.D. Killen, R. Balcomb, and P. Gardinali. 2009.  Marine Pollution Bulletin 58:803-811.

Toxic Contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed: Extent and Severity of Occurrence and Potential Biological Effects - US Environmental Protection Agency, US Geological Survey, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2012 Toxic Contaminants in the Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed: Extent and Severity of Occurrence and Potential Biological Effects, USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD, December, 2012, 175 pages.

Toxics 2000 strategy: A Chesapeake Bay watershed strategy for chemical contaminant reduction, prevention, and assessment - Chesapeake Executive Council. 2000. Agreement. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD.

Tumor prevalence and biomarkers of exposure and response in brown bullheads (Ameiurus nebulosus) from the Anacostia River, Washington, D.C. and Tuckahoe River, Maryland - Pinkney, A.E., J.C. Harshbarger, E.B. May, and W.L. Reichert. 2004.  Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 23:638-647

Tumor prevalence and biomarkers of exposure in brown bullheads (Ameiurus nebulosus) from the Tidal Potomac River watershed - Pinkney, A.E., J.C. Harshbarger, E.B. May, and M.J. Melancon. 2001b.  Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20:1196-1205.

Tumor prevalence and biomarkers of genotoxicity in brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) in Chesapeake Bay tributaries - Pinkney, A.E., J.C. Harshbarger, N.K. Karouna-Renier, K. Jenko, L. Balk, H. Skarphéðinsdóttir, B. Liewenborg, and M.A. Rutter. 2011.  Science of the Total Environment 410:248-257

Tumor prevalence in brown bullheads (Ameiurus nebulosus) from the South River, Anne Arundel County, Maryland - Pinkney, A.E. and J.C. Harshbarger. 2005. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, Annapolis, MD. CBFO-C05-04.

Tumors in brown bullheads (Ameiurus nebulosus) in the Chesapeake Bay watershed - Pinkney A.E., J.C. Harshbarger, and M.A. Rutter. 2009. Analysis of survey data 1992 through 2006. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 21:71-81.

Using the Sediment Quality Triad to characterize baseline conditions in the Anacostia River, Washington, DC, - McGee, B.L., A.E. Pinkney, D.J. Velinsky, J.T.F. Ashley , D.J. Fisher, L.C. Ferrington, and T.J. Norberg-King. 2009. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 156:51-67

Using the sediment quality triad to characterize toxic conditions in the Chesapeake Bay (2002): An assessment of tidal river segments in the Bohemia, Elk, Northeast, and Severn Rivers - Pinkney, A.E., B.L. McGee, P.C. McGowan, D.J. Fisher, J. Ashley, and D. Velinsky. 2005. Using the sediment quality triad to characterize toxic conditions in the Chesapeake Bay (2002): An assessment of tidal river segments in the Bohemia, Elk, Northeast, and Severn Rivers. Prepared for USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, Annapolis, MD. CBFO-C05-01.

Virginia Water Quality Assessment 305(b)/303(d) Integrated Report - VADEQ (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality) and DCR (Department of Conservation and Recreation). 2010. Richmond, VA

White Paper - Pesticides and the Maryland Chesapeake Bay Watershed - understanding the problem and identifying solutions to reduce the impact of pesticides on the watershed - Maryland Pesticide Network. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/20716277/Pesticides-and-the-Maryland-Chesapeake-Bay-Watershed December 17, 2012.