Converse of the Triangle Proportionality Theorem

The Converse of the Triangle Proportionality Theorem says

    • If a line divides two sides of a triangle proportionally, then that line is parallel to the third side

Let's see if this is true.

Demonstration

In the following figure, if

= , prove that line DE is parallel to line AB

This proof is basically the reverse of the proof for the Triangle Proportionality Theorem. It's pretty boring.

Given

=

Take the reciprocal

=

Add 1 to both sides

1 +

= 1 +

Any number divided by itself is 1, so we can replace 1 with CD/CD or CE/CE

+ = +

Combine terms using our common denominator

=

We know that CA is made up of CD and DA. In other words, CA = CD + DA.

On the other hand CB = CE + EB. Combining these parts, we get

=

Now, since both triangles have ∠C included between their corresponding proportional sides, we can use SAS for triangle similarity. Which now means that ΔABD ~ ΔCDE

If the triangles are similar, that means ∠1 ∠2. since we have a transversal line CA going through DE and AB, then we know ∠1 ∠2 if DE || AB, because then 1 and 2 would be corresponding angles. But wait, we already know they are congruent. So, by the converse of the corresponding angles theorem, DE || AB. And that's what we wanted to prove all along

~~~~~~~

Here's how to do it in a 2-column proof

Given

=

Prove that ED || AB,

Statement

Reason

Given

Reciprocal of Both Sides (Technically, Multiplication and Division Properties of Equality)

Addition Property of Equality

Any number divided by itself is 1. That means we can rewrite a 1 as any number we want divided by itself.

Fraction addition

Line Segment Addition Postulate

Reflexive Property

SAS for triangle similarity

Corresponding angles of similar triangles are congruent

Converse of the corresponding angles theorem

Q.E.D

=

=

1 +

= 1 +

+ = +

=

=

∠C ∠C

ΔABD ~ ΔCDE

∠1 ∠2

DE || AB