Note on subjective interpretation

"Thought backed by intent from a personal perspective creates reality"

It's interesting to note that science often states that those who experience anything mystical to be barking mad; those who are subject to hallucinations. Why is it OK to believe in a religion, but not the paranormal. Why is accepting the events of a religious text "real", but not a mystical experience. Everyone seems to call everyone else crazy. The scientist call the religious folk crazy, the religious folk call the paranormal folk crazy, and each of them call the scientist as crazy. And the crazy just want to be heard.

But really, It all comes down to Subjective interpretation.

All psychological and biological phenomena may be interpreted as visions, prophecies, premonitions, apparitions and inspiration (artistic or divine), depending on the experience rs' beliefs and those of their culture.

I say that much mystical phenomena of all types is real, and that it's 'origin', whatever 'it' may be uses or is manifested by interacting with us in a real world way. Be it biological, physiological, or physical. It's this interaction that creates reality and what we take from that, what we make of it, is what defines us as people.

The phenomena of Spiritualism consists of prophecy, clairvoyance, clairaudience, gift of tongues, laying on of hands, healing, visions, trance, apports, revelations, raps, levitation, automatic and independent writing and painting, photography, materialization, psychometry, direct and independent voice, and any other manifestation has the potential to give meaning into our lives and should not be tossed in the trash bin of mystical experiences.