internationalconspiracies

every year the parents of jesus went to jerusalem for the feast of the passover. when jesus was twelve years old, they went to the feast as usual. when the days of the feast were over, they started back home, but the boy jesus stayed in jerusalem. his parents did not know this; they thought he was with the group, so they travelled the whole day, and then started looking for him among their relatives and friends. they did not find him, so they went back to jerusalem looking for him. on the third day they found him in the temple, sitting with the jewish teachers, listening to him and asking questions. all who heard him were amazed at his intelligent answers. his parents were amazed when they saw him, and his mother said to him, "son, why have you done this to us? your father and i have been terribly worried trying to find you."

he answered them, "why did you have to look for me? didn't you know that i had to be in my father's house?" but they did not understand what he said to them.

***

this account of the conversation between the boy christ and the temple teachers only briefly touches on what is now a hidden chapter in our history. for the teachers did more than listen to christ talk - they recorded it. further they kept comtemporary record of christ's life and kept these scrolls in a room below the temple. including when jesus was handed over to the crowd by pilate as he washed his hands of the matter and said "i can find no reason to condemn this man." he released jesus into the hands of the waiting jews and they took him and nailed him to the cross.

this is essentially what happened. the roman was not the one who condemned christ. it was a mob lynching. this too was recorded in the scrolls. the temple was destroyed around 70CE. with they establishment of israel, the zionists gained control of the temple remains in 1967. before this they were already excavating it and later found the sublevel. and the scrolls. and the knowledge herein.

that room was discovered when the jews excavated under wall. what they have built under the temple is a state/military secret. the site was specifically chosen on the calculation that because of the wall such a site would never be bombed by muslims. but for location i will tell you that the wailing wall does extend under the earth to the room beneath. however because of the record contained in the scrolls would rock jewism it will never come to light. they are resolved to destroy the scrolls before that could happen.

also recorded by the old teacher who kept the scrolls were the excited whispers that spread amongst the croud, each asking "did you hear as i - kill christ and the reward shall be this, your own land?" and the shouts filled the air. fearful for the truth, and his life, the old man glanced into the eyes of christ, and saw there knowing. hurredly, he shuffled back to the temple. recorded the last words on the scrolls and sealed them in the room below.

what those in the croud heard was the urgings of the ascended masters, overseen (or overshadowed, as he had done all christ's adult life) by maitreya. with greed burning in their minds and hearts and blood lust rising, they grappled chist, crowded around him and jostled and shoved him to a private garden where they tied him to a tree and beat him until he was bruised and bleeding. on that tree, each carved in a different direction was an archaic jewish symbol. his attackers washed the dust from themselves, straightened their clothes and it was there that they placed a false crown upon his head. and then marched him to his death.

the aids virus

back in the 1980s there was a very small article in our local newspapers. the russians claimed that the aids virus had accidently been released from a us laboritory in africa after a rhesus monkey had escaped.

i believe this for a few reasons. firstly the rhesus monkey is genetically closest to human beings and any bioweapon would have to be trialed on them. secondly the transfer to any human which came into contact would be inevitible, and the first cases of aids was the 'epidemic' in africa.

also because of their stupidity in using a virus of all things... the only thing in nature which mutates on a random basis and they thought they could halt that process (think the common cold. they will never make a vaccine for that which will always work).

thirdly is the presence of viruses never heard of before. one is aptly caused the cat aids virus. then theres the bird flu and the horse aids virus, and the pig aids virus. all these four new viruses have one thing in common which before the development of the aids virus NO OTHER NATURALLY OCCURING VIRUS COULD DO - the capacity to infect an entire different species. cross-contimination, that being most notably humans. expect it to get worse. and pray it doesnt go back to mutating as fast as a noramal virus or we are all screwed.

i think, and i can't be certain but given the worldwide push to eliminate the small pox virus (and by that i mean even restricting and reducing the stocks kept worldwide for the production of the vacceine) which occured around the same time as the first epidemic, that that was the virus they used. also it makes sense to use that one as the basis for the aids virus because it was originally caught off cows by milkmaids whose hands had open cuts, as identified by pasteur, so they knew they were using one that was contageous, but transfer would be limited to blood and fluid contact.

9.11 - the questions unasked

after the dust settled and people began to ask why some questions, which should have been obvious, weren't answered. obvious ones, like what happened to flight 93, and why was it that the military craft describe clearly by witnesses wasn't identified when one was on display at the united states airforce museum since 1996.

another question surrounds the mystery of the "terrorists'" behaviour. there are basically two types who take over civilian planes - hijackers, who have a specific destination or other demand/s in mind and the crew and passengers are both hostages and insurance, more useful alive than dead. and terrorists, who's sole purpose is to cause as much destruction of lives and property as possible. however theatrics doesn't usually play a part in the modus operandi. its position the bombs and boom. simple, direct, devastating.

what happened on the 11th, september, follows neither scenario. here, international alrlines were meticulously hijacked, afther two of the three flights were with wonderful timing delayed. all three were on their way across the continent when the "hijackers" did take over the planes and with expert precision they were turned back and flown straight into the two largest skyscrapers in new york, and the only two in the middle of a huge precint with no other similarly sized buildings anywhere near.

if they had been hijackers, they would have headed to airport of their choice, landed and made their demands. if they had been terrorists they would have simply blown up the planes and not bothered with hijacking them first. so what was happening exactly? why go to all that trouble in the first place? because not only was this hijacking co-ordinated with military precision but choreographed just as effectivly.

look at these photos, taken in sequence of the impacts. both planes were aimed and struck well above the skyline, ensuring maximum visibility to everyone in new york. they came in from different directions, minutes apart. tower one was hit from the south-west at 8:46am. tower two was hit 17min later at 9:09am from the south east. why these directions? because behind the wtc was just one more block, then water. to two sides there was nothing but low buildings and water. nothing physical blocked their path or view. nor the view of witnesses. everything was engineered for maximum visibility BUT NOT FOR MAXIMUM DEVASTATION.

where would they strike if that was the aim? not being a new yorker, i can only guess, but the ground would be a good start.

you might think it devastating that airliners flew into two buildings, exploding and causing their collapse, but look at the precint they were standing in. the collapse of both building couldn't have been less destructive. the collapse of both, one after the other had all the finess of a controlled demolition. even as to the timing.

building two was the second hit, yet it collapsed at 9:59am, almost an hour after impact. it took building one almost 2hours before it began to fall. it collapsed at 10:28 - 1 hour and 52 minutes after. being hit. but why did they fall at all? these buildings were designed to withstand earthquakes and airliner impacts.

(from wikipedia online encyclopedia)

February 13, 1975 fire

On February 13, 1975, a three-alarm fire broke out on the 11th floor of the North Tower. Fire spread through the core to the 9th and 14th floors by igniting the insulation of telephone cables in a utility shaft that ran vertically between floors. Areas at the furthest extent of the fire were extinguished almost immediately and the original fire was put out in a few hours. Most of the damage was concentrated on the 11th floor, fueled by cabinets filled with paper, alcohol-based fluid for office machines, and other office equipment. Fireproofing protected the steel from melting and there was no structural damage to the tower. Other than the damage caused by the fire, a few floors below suffered water damage from the extinguishing of the fires above. At that time, the World Trade Center had no sprinkler systems.

February 26, 1993 bombing

On February 26, 1993, at 12:17 p.m., a Ryder truck filled with 1,500 pounds (680 kg) of explosives was planted by Ramzi Yousef and detonated in the underground garage of the North Tower.The blast opened a 100 foot (30 m) hole through 5 sublevels with the greatest damage occurring on levels B1 and B2 and significant structural damage on level B3. Six people were killed and 50,000 other workers and visitors were left gasping for air within the 110 story towers. Many people inside the North Tower were forced to walk down darkened stairwells that contained no emergency lighting, some taking two hours or more to reach safety.

Yousef fled to Pakistan after the bombing but was arrested in Islamabad in February 1995, and was extradited back to the United States to face trial. Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman was convicted in 1996 for involvement in the bombing and other plots. Yousef and Eyad Ismoil were convicted in November 1997 for their carrying out the bombing. Four others had been convicted in May 1994 for their involvement in the 1993 bombing. According to a presiding judge, the conspirators' chief aim at the time of the attack was to destabilize the north tower and send it crashing into the south tower, toppling both landmarks.

Following the bombing, floors that were blown out needed to be repaired to restore the structural support they provided to columns. The slurry wall was in peril following the bombing and loss of the floor slabs which provided lateral support to counteract pressure from Hudson River water on the other side. The refrigeration plant on sublevel B5, which provided air conditioning to the entire World Trade Center complex, was heavily damaged. Subsequent to the bombing, the Port Authority installed photoluminescent markings in the stairwells. The fire alarm system for the entire complex needed to be replaced because critical wiring and signaling in the original system was destroyed. As a memorial to the victims of the bombing of the tower, a reflecting pool was installed with the names of those who had been killed in the blast.

****

one of the arguments that the weight of the structure above the impacted floors brought the rest down. if that was the case, the 1993 bombing which blasted through 5 floors of the foundations (2 subfloors destroyed utterly and 3 others heavily damaged) would have been enough to topple tower one. it withstood the blast, and it was work as usual for companies and employees as the tower one's foundation was repaired.

even the double catastophy itself invalidates that theory. tower two may have been hit mid section (both towers are 110 stories tall) but tower one was it near to the top. and yet - for some reason - they both collapsed in the same manner.

now let's look at another mystery - the collapse of building 7. a building not struck by an aircraft, though perhaps that was the intended target of the hijackers of flight 93, protected from debris from the fall of the towers 1 & 2 by buildings 5 & 6, and not even in the same precinct. and the precinct itself is 16 acres. yet somehow it not only caught on fire but also managed to destroy itself. ironically, or perhaps not so, is that the premise of military exercises that took place that very day was that a hijacked plane was targetting that very building, which housed cia.

the 9.11 news story the world forgot

in the money and in the know - 9.11

In 1998, the Port Authority approved plans to privatize the World Trade Center. In 2001, the Port Authority sought to lease the World Trade Center to a private entity. Bids for the lease came from Vornado Realty Trust, a joint bid between Brookfield Properties Corporation and Boston Properties, and a joint bid by Silverstein Properties and The Westfield Group. By privatizing the World Trade Center, it would be added to the city's tax rolls and provide funds for other Port Authority projects. On February 15, 2001, the Port Authority announced that Vornado Trust Realty had won the lease for the World Trade Center, paying $3.25 billion for the 99-year lease. Vornado Realty outbid Silverstein by $600 million though Silverstein upped his offer to $3.22 billion. However, Vornado insisted on last minute changes to the deal, including a shorter 39-year lease which the Port Authority considered nonnegotiable. Vornado later withdrew and Silverstein's bid for the lease to the World Trade Center was accepted on April 26, 2001, and closed on July 24, 2001.

global banking unsecure

here's what happens when most the world's 'secure' servers are all on the same software platform, there's a big scare about the y2k bug and everone rushes to accept the united states government free handout of the 'update'. suddenly no server is secure. and nobody notices. and maybe occasionally someone does notice their account is out by a few cents - but it's just a few cents to a dollar so they shrug and think nothing of it.

.......... america 'demonstrates' how easy it is to steal money (and wreck someone's life if they wanted. this isn't the movies, folks.). i caught them out five times!! and here's the proof as screenshots! at the time this was happening to me, i had three different types of accounts, all with the one bank - a visa credit account, a mastercard credit account and a visa debit account.

precursory deposit there....

precursory deposit NOT there....

precursory deposit there AGAIN!

and yet days after the overnight stay, and days after payment has gone through the precursory deposit is still showing up in 'card authorisations' and pulling the AVAILABLE BALANCE in the negatives.... BUT not the CURRENT BALANCE??

actual atm inquiry as to the balance of my account. note that the available balance is in the negatives, yet the current balance is positive!

"8:39am nov 4 2007 and i am back online. just as well my ex and i were in the process of selling the house when they started freezing my accounts and stealing my funds - and the buyers finally came thruough with the cheque. i now have 2 bank cheques of $5000 each and i had another $5000 in cash. thats my half. most of it went to paying off the mortgage which we couldnt afford with me out of work. i'm eating through that now but at least i can eat for a while, go insane with all the 'voices' in my head in private and, most importantly, i could afford to replace my laptop after the cia broke in (yet again) and stole the power cord to my old dell, which i unfortunately left behind. you cant buy that anymore cause its such an old model. so now i'm typing this on my new basic acer laptop (and the difference in weight is amazing. i was carrying the old one around everyday, and my mp3 player which had all my blog notes, to prevent them from breaking me more. and as soon as i realised they had a bugging device in the sensor unit of my home monitoring system i started carrrying that around too.)"

back to the pics. they are actual screenshots which i've converted to jpeg because the bitmaps would have been too big.

relevent parts highlighted. note the dates and time, and the highlighted amounts. remember that this is a credit account so negative amounts means the bank owes me and positive figures means i owe the bank. click on pictures to enlarge.

first screen shot. note the amount deposited. account limit was $17500, $81000 deposited. a scan of the actual bank deposit receipt

and a screenshot of when the cheque cleared showing the payment

second screen shot - note the available credit. its in the POSITIVES

now LOOK AT THE AVAILABLE CREDIT AGAIN. its in the NETAGIVES!

and as a final screenshot, the amount deposited again

and as if that isn't enough....

let's do a bit of maths.... if the available credit is $33427.31 and the balance is #19532.31 (with no card authorisations to come out) that would make the credit limit of $13895?... no, its supposed to be $17500! and that wouldnt matter how many payments are put in either! the maximum credit limit on the card should not change.

another "exercise" in how they can control my life - this time infiltrating my visa account. note the amount deposited. this is a scan of the actual deposit receipt. and the teller hand wrote the balance of the visa card before and after the deposit.

now.... maths.... -$8001.15 + $16640 = $8638.85. and if you think the teller just made a mistake when she wrote down the balance check the screenshots taken a week later. given the balance before the deposit, they just don't make sense.

there is a $8000 limit (slightly overdrawn) on this account. also note this was an over-the-counter deposit that happened on the nov 1 2007, and these screenshots were a record of my account on nov 8, and that the available balance exceeds the balance even after one week.

note that the available credit does not match what should be available once outstanding amount has been paid in full. check the time stamp at the top left of bank window and payment date.

.... and note how the BALANCE goes from POSITIVE

to NEGATIVE for both the visa and mastercard accounts

the other two times it involved paying for purchases using paypal. again i have the pictures to prove something suss.

having purchased an item via ebay i was referred to the company's market place interface to pay for it. however due to loss of replacement card (old one expired) i had to wait for a new one with different numbers on it. mysteriously, i received an email confirming checkout was complete for something i hadn't paid for. note that the email has no shipping added, no billing or delivery address and no card number. the emails, thankfully, are saved on google's server. i switched to gmail after strong suspicions that i wasn't getting all my emails via my own isp.

on this occasion my paypal account was interfered with. transaction records were changed. emails of actual transactions **no longer match the on-site history**. doesn't matter, you say? afterall they still got paid. i still got my items. but that isn't the point. it's another case of financial records freely altered my some unscrupulous organisation.i picked this up on three recent purchase records. paypal does email you the instant you make a payment or 'send money'. and my emails go to my gmail account. so i still have them.

two of the payments were for ebay purchases. the other transaction was to pay extra to make up for the postage method i chose. now, while i can't say 100% when the transaction history on-site was changed, i'm pretty damned sure it was only in the last month...

date/time stamps and transaction ids are highlighted for comparison.

well, with my paypal account also interfered with, that means that every financial account i've had has been accessed by some "unknown party" and altered in some way - my savings account, both visa and mastercard accounts, and now my paypal account. i did email them to inform them of this breach of security but only response was that it will be 'escalated'.

one might ask why. well, if this was happening regularly to any number of accounts worldwide, who never noticed their records being changed, and whose banks also held no record of electronic money disappearing and reappearing, i'd say it was so that certain governments could play the short term money market. putting a few extra zeros on their national account might be a bit obvious, but speculating is one way to launder illegal funds. money for nothing.

.... you think somebody doesn't like me? somebody that uses the rootkit server virus to steal funds? alter website content? interfere with people's lives? somebody? just to prove they can, despite me posting off the screenshots to both my bank and to asio because it won't change a thing? some body.... or some governments?

i think they just don't like me because i would not be convinced that i had past lives lived in servitude of some great cause. because i would not play their game. and because in a desperate effort to understand what was happening to me i searched the internet, and found i wasn't the only one. i am possibly the only one, however, with a bent for gathering information and trying, at least, to let others know.

CONTACT VIA EMAIL tahn1000@gmail.com

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse