globalenvironment

here is a diagram of the antartica showing the ozone layer thickness between years 1982 and 1994. this comes from the hardcover book titled "Weather - Revised and Updated", published as a revised edition 2007 by The Five Mile Press Pty Ltd, victoria, australia. original copyright 1996 US Weldon Owen Ltd and Weldon Owen Pty Ltd. ISBN:978-1-74178-762-7. while you are looking at this i want you to ask yourself just one question - how do you poke a hole in the atmosphere? remember the ozone is just a layer of air that we have given a different name to. so, is there any little home science experiment that anyone can come up with to explain how air **naturally** thins itself in one spot only?? remember, you aren't allowed to use anything solid like a glass tube, and do something to the air or water in that. i think somebody would have noticed a gigantic beaker if there was one over the south pole by now.

the writing is as follows -

THE OZONE HOLE over Antarctica, shown in dark red and pink (above), has grown since the early 1980s. The colours represent ozone concentrations, from dark red for the lowest, through pink, blue, and yellow, to green for the highest.

.... one has to wonder who's teritorial bases were under the center of it at the time, and whether it was "gradual" as claimed - and if it was, why wasnt it noticed earlier?? - or a rather sudden consequence of an american experiment. and note the rather small band of pink around the red bit in the 1986 map. a drastic drop in a relatively small area. one also has to wonder if chloroflourocarbons (CFC) was just a scapegoat used to cover the real cause up. the answer to the first question is under that pink blob is the usa's amundsen-scott south pole base.

testing in the south pole research centers (america has two)? is that why a hole "suddenly appeared"? who has seen this array in antarctica??...... that is what it is designed to do...the public patent (number 4686605, lodged by RAYTHEON, the 5th largest american defence contractor), was titled "a method and apparatus for altering a region of the earth's atmosphere, ionisphere (where the ozone layer is), and magnetosphere", and claimed the following uses..... (continued)who has seen these? contact me tahn1000@gmail.combecause that "hole" triggered the global warming movement. and it isn't "healing", as they call it on the news. it simply closed over, resulting in an overall thinning of the ozone layer which protects our world and makes life on our planet possible.

cloning animals, glossing over "known issues" and getting away with it ...

while in nutritional difference between the cloned and naturally conceived dinner plate will always be glossed over as "not significant", other issues have already come to light, at least in a commercial sense. we will never know what millitary applications have already created using cloning techniques. and if you doubt that - think about it. even the microwave oven was developed and released commercially **after** the same company (raytheon) had a folder full of patents for various designs for microwave weaponry. and the united states at least had a policy in place for the research and devopment of human genome projects since 1900.

so lets look at what has been admitted, at least, for the animals favoured for profitable clone development. firstly it is known that cloning will reduce their lifespan, and lead to an increase and sooner development of age related diseases.

an exerpt from an article published on the australian abc website, thursday 27 may 1999.

"Dolly the sheep has DNA damage that might cause premature ageing, according to research by scientists who created the clone in 1996. The team from the Scottish biotechnology firm PPL Therapeutics has found Dolly and two other cloned sheep have shorter than normal telomeres - sections of DNA at the end of chromosomes thought to be involved in ageing.

Telomeres have been likened to the protective caps on the ends of shoelaces that prevent the lace from unravelling over time. Only in living cells, it's thought the telomeres on the ends of chromosomes become progressively shorter with multiple cell divisions, until they reach a point when the chromosomes become unstable and prone to damage. This may be a mechanism to ensure the death of cells once they reach a certain age.

In today's Nature, the team report that Dolly, who was cloned from a cell taken from a six-year-old sheep, had telomeres about 20 per cent shorter than other sheep of a similar age conceived naturally. The finding is not unexpected because cells used for cloning have to be cultured - allowed to divide many times in laboratory dishes - a process that is known to shorten telomeres. And in Dolly's case, the shortening was compounded because she was derived from a cell from a middle-aged animal. But the confirmation is of interest because it should allow scientists to test theories linking shortened telomeres with premature ageing.

PPL's research director, Alan Coleman, said the team had not observed any signs of premature ageing in Dolly yet, but he conceded they might show up later. He says it is impossible to predict precisely how long the world famous sheep will live. It is not known what length of telomere is critical for life. Previous studies by researchers in the United States have shown mice bred to have shorter telomeres, did indeed show premature ageing - their hair turned grey, they developed cancers and died earlier than usual..."

"If the telomere theory is proven correct, it may place limits on the potential of exciting new medical technology arising from developments in cloning. Hopes of taking master cells from cloned human embryos and growing them into perfectly matched organs for transplant surgery could be thwarted if the process of creating the organs left them with a short life."

oh yes. as usual, only foisting commercial applications on an unsuspecting world will make up for the billions spent. in the end some justification of budget has to be sought... (from an article published monday 3rd july 2006)

"It later emerged that the same team, managed by Ian Wilmut, had previously created two sheep clones from embryonic cells. So, strictly speaking, Dolly was the first mammal to be successfully cloned from an adult cell.

Not all good news

After this breakthrough, other cloned species swiftly followed: horses, bulls, pigs, mice, rats, rabbits, cats and dogs and others. But the miscarriage rate of transplanted eggs is extremely high, and of those embryos that make it to term, many have deformities or, as happened with Dolly, die prematurely, a clear warning to any scientist mad or foolish enough to try to make a cloned baby.

The suspected cause is that the genetic software isn't transferred entirely, or is somehow damaged in the transfer. As a result, the machinery malfunctions - genes don't switch on or off as they should in the complex ballet of making proteins."

Dolly the cloned sheep, by the way, died at the ripe old age of six, barely reaching half the average lifespan of her more natural cousins. from the wikipedia website -

"Dolly (July 5, 1996 – February 14, 2003), a female sheep or ewe, was the first mammal to be cloned from an adult somatic cell, using the process of nuclear transfer. The cell used was a mammary gland , proving that a cell taken from a specific body part could create a whole individual. She was named Dolly after the curvaceous country western singer Dolly Parton. Previously it was believed that a specific cell could only produce replicas of the same body part from which it was obtained. She was cloned by Ian Wilmut, Keith Campbell and colleagues at the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh, Scotland, and lived there until her death at age six. Her birth was announced in February 1997."

"On November 11, 2003 it was announced that Dolly had been euthanised because of a progressive lung disease and crippling arthritis. A Finn Dorset such as Dolly would have had a life expectancy of around 12 - 15 years."

the autopsy concluded that dolly did not die as a result of being a clone. however she developed diseases only aged sheep were prone to suffer. remember she was cloned from a six year old sheep. so at the age of seven, genetically she was already 13 years old.

those flaws are genetic. they would be passed onto any and all offspring, threatening their genetic 'stability' generation to generation. a cascading of congenital deformities which with further cloning/inbreeding would only become both more numerous and more complex.

american propoganda furthering their own (cloning) ambitions

from time magazine website, article published sunday 19 febuary 2008 -

"Last month the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the sale of cloned meat in the U.S., having determined that products from cloned cattle, pigs and goats are as safe to eat as meat from their naturally reproduced brethren. That makes advocates happy: Cloning enables the livestock industry to do in a fraction of the time what breeders have been doing throughout history, narrowing the gene pool to its most desirable genes. Beyond that, say cloners, future benefits include production of genetically engineered animals that could offer a variety of benefits — more nutrient-rich milk, for example, for people without adequate access to food..."

"There are about 4,000 cloned cattle on the planet, and 600 of them in the U.S. They are used primarily for breeding purposes, and as yet, their products aren't officially sold anywhere — though there is anecdotal evidence that cloned food products have made their way into the market in the past. Currently the U.S., E.U., Australia, China, Japan and New Zealand all use cloned cattle and pigs. ViaGEN, a cloning and animal genetics company based in Austin, Tex., produces some 150 cloned cattle annually, which it sells to meat suppliers, primarily for breeding. ViaGEN says it will launch a system to log and track each of its clones, with a unique tracking number — but not its DNA — that will be stored in an independently run database. The company will also make efforts to keep any food products made from its clones out of markets that don't want them. "We're not making it voluntary," says Mark Walton, president of ViaGEN. "We will register every animal we produce and put that animal in the database so that information is available...."

THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE LIE!! australia doesn't have a "market" for cloned animals! a country with more than 23 million head of cattle and more than 100 million sheep DOES NOT need to clone or shortcut nature when it comes to breeding.

from the abc (australian broadcast channel) website, wednesday 16 january 2008 -

"Milk and meat from cloned cattle, pigs and goats is now officially as safe to eat as their everyday counterparts, says the US food safety authority. The announcement this week by the US Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA) follows a similarly favourable interim ruling on such foods from the European food safety agency. Australia meanwhile is considering its own experts' advice.

Cloned animals are most commonly produced using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), the same technique used to create Dolly, the sheep. In this process, the genetic material of an animal with desirable traits is inserted into an egg, which is then implanted into a surrogate mother...."

"Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) says Australia is still considering whether to regulate food from cloned animals and their offspring. But at this stage, the food agency says there are no such products in the food chain. FSANZ says there are less than 100 cloned cattle and a small number of cloned sheep in Australia and New Zealand. It says researchers have voluntarily agreed to prevent these from entering the food chain. FSANZ says it provided the Australian Government with an assessment of evidence on cloned animal products safety at the end of 2007.

At the time of writing, the Department of Health and Ageing, which is providing a whole-of-government response on the question of cloned animals, could not provide any further comment."

as it is a known american attitude that they as civillians do not look outside their own back yard, let alone their own state or nation. such propoganda is easily disceminated and swallowed hook line and sinker. any nation outside of the new world government (basically the EU, japan and the united states. by default canada, alaska and mexico eventually when it is annexed. israel would be an 'unofficial' member) should look on their internal machinery very nervously.

in the meantime is should also be obvious that any differences in nutritional value will **never** come to light.... from the agence france-press wed 13 april 2005 -

"Beef and milk from cloned cattle is similar to that produced by normal animals, an international team of scientists has found.

The Japanese-US study, published online ahead of print in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the first to investigate the nutritional value and possible health risks of products from animal clones. "Most parameters of the composition of the meat and milk from somatic animal clones were not significantly different from those of their genetically matched comparators or industry breed comparators," says Professor Xiangzhong Yang of the University of Connecticut, who led the research team."

..... were not significantly different. so there were measurable differences, but not "significant" enough to be specific about. after all here is a technology which will make potentially billions of dollars in the food and medical industries. heaven forbid that any data should come to light to put a dint in that.

CONTACT VIA EMAIL tahn1000@gmail.com

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse