changinghistory

judas and peter

in our modern bibles it is written that judas betrayed christ for a bag of gold, but this is a long held denial of the truth of those events. for it was peter that betrayed christ. judas had the misfortune of becoming the scape goat.

christ and peter saw differently how their (for peter saw it as "their") word should be spread. christ spoke of spiritual matters and saught to teach those that would listen. peter saw the makings of a religion, one in which he would hold a significant position. peter sought more than just a rabble following christ around. he wanted organisation, centralised rallying of the faithful. he wanted temples.

but this was not christ's way, and so he stood in way of peter's ambitions. it was peter who told the soldiers where christ would be. but when judas saw them enter the garden, being close to jesus already and guessing that what the disciples had feared was about to come to pass, he quickly moved forward and emotionally gave christ a kiss before the soldiers could lay hands on him and arrest him. peter, ever jealous of the loyalty shown to jesus, saw opportunity. he and jesus often argued, so it was possible that he would be suspected. he resolved to leave some gold coins (he was responsible for the purse of the group) amongst judas's belongings. when these were 'discovered' he was accused. with all fingers pointed at him he could not convince them of his innocence.

but christ had already deduced what had happened, which is why he knew that peter would deny knowing him in order to disassociate himself with jesus even though for appearances sake he had to go with the other disciples as a show of support for their arrested teacher. unable to say much he still clearly told peter that he knew his presence was a mockery.

later judas was kidnapped and murdered. perhaps hung from the very tree that christ was bound to and beaten.

judas is still used as an adjective to describe something that is being set up to be sacrificed since those times. and this is an apt way to be reminded of what truly happened.

rewriting jewish history

the single biggest piece of propaganda used to cover up a litany of corruption, falsifying of history and genocide is this man - adolf hitler, a jew himself. the two separately written and published volumes of mein kampf are effectively unheard of now. and the jewish book that inspired them may no longer exist at all except in a few very guarded vaults.but lets look at the man himself. the man who made germany a military power to be reckoned with - and the rest of the world did - who expoused with fevour the perfect aryan - TALL, FAIR SKINNED, BLONDE HAIRED AND BLUE EYED. a description not befitting the swarthy, black haired, black moustached fanatic who sported a very distinct nose... hitler was born illegitimate in braunau am inn, austria. his father a jew named alois hitler (1837-1903) "kept" his non-jewish austrian wife, klara poltz (1860-1907), and beat his family regularly. Of Alois and Klara's six children, only Adolf and his sister Paula reached adulthood. as an adult, years later, he told his secretary "i then resolved never again to cry when my father whipped me. a few days later I had the opportunity of putting my will to the test. my mother, frightened, took refuge in the front of the door. as for me, i counted silently the blows of the stick which lashed my rear end."hitler, by the way, is the english version of huetler or huettler.now this is how the jews and their supporters got away with their lie about huettler's heritage - for certain more 'strict' sects of jewism the official passing on of religion is maternal. not only was it against jewish law for alois to marry the object of his obsession but her children would never be recognised by his religion as being jewish, except that which was inherited through their mother's bloodline. in order to quell historical objections until all could be swept under the carpet of time the propaganda machine has "acknowleged" that huettler **may** have been one quarter jew on his mother's side. but that would, in total, make him 3/4 jew in reality, doesn't it? since jews marry jews only to maintain their "purity" one may assume that they are in fact a race with specific racial traits common to all. and huettler inherited them to full measure. his face reflects his parentage. his adult passion against their race reflects his reaction to the violence of his upbringing and his ideology directly reflects the book his father shoved down his throat even as he beat him. hence the similarities between huettler's genocidal ideology and what has been happening in palestine ever since.

strangely, history seems to have forgotten his equal dislike and mistreatement of those of slavic descent, especially gypsies and polish peoples. nor is it frequently found anywhere anymore that he was also antichristian, seeing christianity "as a hoax engineered by the jews to throw off their roman yoke**".

nor was the idea of engineering the perfect human a novel concept to the world at large. even before huettler came into power, the eugenics movement was burgeoning in germany, britain and the united states. eugenics looked at persons in the same way they looked at any other form of life, that the human race, like roses and cattle could be bred for superiority.

** a quote from "bevor huettler kam" (Before Huettler Came), chapter 4, first published in 1933. and quickly suppressed. less than 5000 copies made it to circulation.

political history of the zionist movement

zionism far predates the end of the second world war and never began "in sympathy" to the suffering of the jewish people. in fact they were "establishing themselves" in palistine as early as 1908.

the first zionist congress of two hundered and forty four was held in 1897. it was meant to be held in munich but the jewish community there openly protested and it was instead held at basel, switzerland in august. the following is an account from the clearly pro-zionist author of that meeting and it's aims.

***

The first Zionist congress solemnly proclaimed in the face of the attentive world that the Jews are a nation, and that they do not desire to be absorbed by other nations. It vowed to work for the emancipation of that part of the Jewish race which is deprived of all rights, and which is dragging out its existence in undeserved misery, and to prepare for it a brighter future. It puts its aims on record in a programme unanimously adopted with the greatest enthusiasm. This ran as follows:—

"Zionism works to create for the Jewish people a home in Palestine guaranteed by public law.

For the reaching of this goal the congress proposes to adopt the following means:—

(1.) The well-regulated promotion of the settlement of Palestine by Jewish agriculturists, artisans, and manufacturers.

(2.) The organization and knitting together of the whole Jewish community by means of proper local and general institutions, in accordance with the law of the different countries.

(3.) The strengthening of the Jewish self-respect and national consciousness.

(4.) Preparatory steps for obtaining the consent of the governments, which is necessary for the achievement of the aims of Zionism."

***

("zionism" by max nordau, from chapter 4. published by fox, duffield and co, new york, 1905)

they set up their head quarters in vienna, lead by theodor herzl (1860-1904), journalist and author of "the jewish state" in 1896 (amongst the various factions this was already a subject of contention). after the death of herzl, who might be considered the founding father, the movement was transferred to cologne.

the jewish national fund was established in 1901 for the purchase of land in palestine as "the inalienable possession of the jewish people" (this fund still exists today, and in support of the same purpose). in 1908 the zionist organisation begand "practical work" in palestine by establishing and office in jaffa and an land development company, and engaged in "urban and agricultural colonisation". in other words they used their member contributions to buy up property and kick the locals off.

in 1911 the headquarters was moved again, to berlin. but as palestine was under the protection of the british empire a move to london, england, was inevitable as british rule was supposed to protect the sovereign rights of the palestinian people. their "protection" of the people's rights, however prooved meaningless. even the so-called balfour declaration stressing that while the british government was sympathic to the zionist cause, it should be clearly understood that "nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-jewish communities in palestine, or the rights and political status of jews in any other country". the cause did not enjoy the support or sympathy of the majority of jews, who did not want to be forced to leave their current homes. in fact the orthodox, reform and liberal jews, along with the socialist bund jews of poland, roundly condemned the organisation.

britain again expressed the same policy was stated before the united nations (then called league of nations) in 1922. however, the second world war gave the zionists the leverage to push their cause, gain a foothold in palestine and constantly encroach on their borders ever since. they began worldwide campaign on the "suffering of jews" and the supposed mass extermination at the hands of hitler because of their ethnicity became a persecution of religion. they weren't the only ones which didn't conform to the aryan racial traits hitler tried to enforce, but who cares about the others?? and they certainly had the money and means to flee, unlike so many of the peasantry.