Secondary Transition Assessment

The Bottom Line

A comprehensive evaluation, that includes at least two transition assessments, must occur before the end of grade 9 and must address

Secondary transition evaluations cannot "stand alone" and must be part of a comprehensive evaluation addressing all areas of need. Transition assessment must not only identify needs but also the student’s strengths, preferences, and interests.

Refer to the Evaluation Planning Guide for more information on the assessments needed and who to involve.

Interview Forms

TRAX Surveys

Visit the TRAX page on the SCRED website to learn more about logging into and using the TRAX website.

Step 1: Send TRAX survey to parent(s)/guardian(s), teachers, and student

As soon as consent for evaluation is obtained, send TRAX survey to necessary team members. Follow these directions to send a TRAX survey: Click Here 

The determination of which TRAX survey to use with a particular student should be based on the student’s goals for postsecondary education, employment, and independent living, as well as input from IEP team members.

Step 2: View TRAX results

Follow these directions to view TRAX results: Click Here

Once you have results up, click the “Display by Group” green button at the top. This will organize the results by the different categories (workplace skills, responsibility, interacting with others, basic academic skills, habits of wellness, planning for success, and computer and internet skills).

Step 3: Interpret TRAX Results

Review the results and determine one to two categories that are relative strengths for the student and one to two categories that are relative weaknesses for the student. List these in the table in the template.

Note — Some raters have a tendency to rate every item as a strength or weakness without leaving them blank to indicate the skill is okay. You may need to follow up with survey takers to determine which skills they are actually worried about and which ones they believe to be strengths. If you need to do this, you should put a statement in the validity section of the template stating the survey participant did not understand the directions and results were gained by a follow-up interview.

Once relative strength and weakness categories are determined, list a few skills from that category in the table in the template. This helps readers understand the types of skills the student is either good at or may have a relative weakness in.

Finally, consider the results of the survey in conjunction with other information you know.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do we need to complete two transition assessments during the evaluation?

IDEA (Section 1414 (d) (1) (A) (i) (VIII)) clearly states that postsecondary goals must be based on transition assessments (plural). Thus, at a minimum, we must complete at least two transition assessments to meet the legal requirement.

Why do we need to complete a comprehensive evaluation to administer transition assessments?

Minnesota state statute 3525.2900 specifies  that "Secondary transition evaluation results must be documented as part of an evaluation report."

If we need to complete a comprehensive evaluation that includes transition assessments to meet state statute, how are we able to administer transition assessments annually to update the transition PLAAFP?

We must obtain consent (initial) or attempt to obtain consent (re-eval) for comprehensive evaluations that will determine special education eligibility. However, we can still use individual evaluation tools (e.g., CBMs) to inform our teaching and to update our IEPs. For example, we don't get special permission to give students an ORF probe to update their IEP goal. The big difference is how we are using the data. In an evaluation, that data is used to make a decision about eligibility or continued eligibility while between evaluations we use data to inform our teaching and update our IEPs.

You might wonder, 'Does that mean that I could administer, say, an IQ test between evaluations in order to update an IEP?' Ethically, standardized assessments (e.g., IQ tests, WJ-Achievement, ABAS, BASC, etc.) would not fall under use outside of an evaluation, as the main purpose of standardized norm-referenced assessments is to compare skills to a nationally normed base in order to support eligibility determinations. Compared to CBMs, transition assessments, etc., standardized norm-referenced assessments do not provide useful information for program planning or IEP goal development, and you wouldn't use them as progress monitoring tools.

If I complete an evaluation including transition assessments during a student’s 7th or 8th grade year, do I write a transition IEP during their 7th/8th grade year or wait until their 9th grade year when a transition IEP is legally due?

Once educational needs have been identified through a comprehensive evaluation, they must be addressed in the IEP. Because you have identified transition needs via the 7th or 8th grade evaluation, the IEP must begin to address those needs. Click here for more information on addressing secondary transition in an IEP.