Reception Class
Reception Class Child Support Worker
Senior Reading Groups - 3 groups of Year 7 and 8's taken by Jenni Clarke
Child Support in the classroom
Reading Support Years 5/6 (Reported on separately)
Reading Support Years 7/8
Quick 60 - (Reported on separately)
STEPS Programme
Reading Eggs
Early Intervention Programme - for a small group of New Entrant children run by Doreen Fester
Agility with Sounds - Helen Squires
The introduction of a Reception class in 2017 has continued for our Newest Entrants to school. The idea was to have a very experienced teacher run this class with a huge emphasis on play and oral language and a great deal of emphasis on the Key Competencies and learning the rules and routines at school but still having many opportunities to be creative and play. Therefore the transition from Pre-School to School was a more gentle process for these children and while learning the Pt England Way they would have a settled and consistent start to school. Viola and Helen Squires are doing a great job and running a very effective Programme and have continued to Inquire into what works best for our tamariki at this critical phase.
Eighteen students from years 7 & 8 who were reading at 9 years or below at the end of 2018, were placed into 3 groups according to reading age for half hour sessions on 3 or 4 days per week, from early in Term 1. Many of these students had been unable to graduate from Reading Support at the end of year 6, while the rest were new students to our school or ESOL students or had had reading ages of below 7 years as year 6 students and so had been unable to access Reading Support. Another student joined one of these groups during the year to bring the number up to 19 in this intervention.
The main focus for these groups was on decoding strategies as this seemed to be the area of weakness that was holding most of them back. There was a systematic approach taken with a ‘rule’ being introduced then reading and writing words and reading texts which gave them the opportunity to practise using the strategy.
Some points to note:
Some students were not confident with all the letter sounds
Many students relied on visual rather than auditory strategies
Students who came regularly and on time, made the most progress
Conversely, poor attenders made little or no progress
Behaviour challenges made 1 group almost unworkable most days (a student was removed from this group in term 3)
Reflection
A large part of this intervention involved encouraging and motivating the students to see themselves as capable of learning to read well, and what that could do for them. The students who asked questions and really engaged with the learning, made gains.
The Agility With Sound intervention was a pilot to gauge its efficacy in supporting those students in Year 5 who were reading well below their peers. This Programme was designed by Betsy Sewell as an Intervention for older children who have struggled to learn to read. Midway in term 1 students were selected and tested according to Agility with Sounds tests. This highlighted children who had a weakness in sound to letter knowledge. We started in Week 6 with 3 groups of 4 children for 3 half hour sessions a week. This continued consistently throughout Term 2.
Here is a description of the Agility With Sound Programme
However in Term 3, I was required temporarily to be fulltime in our New Entrant space as we had a new teacher start. At this time though I supported Hannah West initially and then Migi Sio also into incorporating the Agility of Sound lessons into their Year 5 classroom reading programme with the children who had become familiar with it in my small groups. This meant that I was able to test and take on 7 more children, starting in Week 4. Unfortunately as the New Entrant enrolments had increased, by Week 7 I was required to be back fulltime in my classroom so the withdrawal group Agility With Sound programme was unable to be continued.
11 students initially started in Term 1 Week 6. However one left Pt England School, and one got replaced after the first term because of her attendance. Four other students were taken on (Two in Term 1 Week 8, one in Week 9 and one in Term 2 Week 1). Of these students, seven had a 15 week, and one a 10 week intervention with me then continued the programme with their teacher. Four of these students continued the withdrawal programme with the new intake of students in Term 3 which was able to be continued for only 3 more weeks.
Despite the programme not being as consistent as was hoped, both the classroom teachers and I could see that the children’s decoding skills increased as did their confidence. This was particularly evident with the students who had consistent attendance and who practised at home. There were some pleasing shifts in reading levels for a few, while others who, although didn’t make the expected gain, still did shift.
The transitioning of the programme into the classrooms was well supported. I felt it was really important that the resources needed for it had to be able to be managed well, so that there was little setting up time. This enabled as many components as possible to be incorporated in the time available for each group. This meant also establishing systems where the students could practise certain elements independent of the teacher. The teachers involved felt that the classroom programme we established together was both manageable and effective.
At Pt England a large percentage of the students have a language other than English spoken in their home. The following numbers of students receive funding from the Ministry of Education to support them to access the curriculum in English. The number of NZ Born children who are receiving funding continues to grow and we need to continue to ensure that we have programmes and support in place to cater for their diverse needs and to continue to monitor their progress appropriately.
2019
Refugee Background: 5
Migrants: 26
NZ Born: 96
2018
Refugee Background: 5
Migrants: 25
NZ Born: 89
2017
Refugee Background: 5
Migrants: 25
NZ Born: 67
2016
Refugee: 2
Migrants: 12
NZ Born: 31
Only some of the funded ESOL students are included in the Quick 60 groups. Other interventions are used to support students such as senior literacy group, Reading Support, teacher aide in the classroom and the Manaiakalani Process - Learn Create Share and our Agility with Sound Programme. As and when appropriate new Learners of English are given, a buddy who speaks the same language. We have also continued to explore online programmes to enhance the classroom programme and to help expose these learners to Literacy in a structured and well scaffolded manner.
Most of them are NZ born students, a small number from migrant backgrounds and only a few are refugees. With a strong classroom learning environment and the extra group work most of the students show good gains in their English ability over the period of three years. The rate of progress varies greatly between students. In most cases the rate of progress depends entirely on the students natural ability to learn, and provided with the right learning environment they will succeed. A group of these students make quite slow progress and often with ESOL students it takes time to find out if they actually have specific learning difficulties as well as second language issues. Some of the refugee students have trauma in their backgrounds and this can affect their progress.
All students who qualify have been assessed twice during the year using English Language Learning Progressions (ELLP). The scores will be sent in to the Ministry at the end of February. All funded children are receiving support in some way. There are many interventions in place to satisfy the array of learning needs and many teachers include these students in their 'Inquiry'. These interventions are evaluated regularly so that the resource is being used appropriately for each child.
Teachers have continued to have Literacy PD delivered by Jannie van Hees and this has been on a Team by team needs basis.
In 2019 we had a small Senior Literacy group that were in the Agility with Sounds Groups. Children have been supported 1-1 and as part of small group Interventions throughout the year. This is an area that needs more attention in 2019. Ideally we need to have more support for these children and more regular checks on their progress. We are continuing to seek appropriate Intervention Programmes to help to close the gap.
A goal for 2020 is to better track the outcomes for these children on a more regular basis over and above the ELLP data.
Toni Nua