Embedded Files
Starter: what might perspectives might be revealed through the peer review process in scientific research?
Starter: what might perspectives might be revealed through the peer review process in scientific research?
Objective: explore perspectives in the natural sciences.
Objective: explore perspectives in the natural sciences.
Outcomes:
Outcomes:
Traditionally, peer reviews in science have been anonymous. Why might this tradition be being challenged? Build a table / t-chart of pros and cons of anonymous versus public reviewing.
2. How else might perspectives play a role in knowledge production and acquisition in the natural sciences?
3. Explore these positive and negative effects of perspectives in the natural sciences:
Positive effects of different iPerspectives:
2 versions of how Big Bang happened
What are the implications of these two different perspectives?
Negative outcomes as a result of different perspectives:
What are the implications of these two different perspectives?
4. How can we see the science denial perspective today? What are the implications of this? Is it like the Big Bang Theory? Or more like HIV/AIDS?
PLENARY: is science getting in the way of science? Click the image below to find out...
PLENARY: is science getting in the way of science? Click the image below to find out...
Report abuse