Do those involved in what has been called “cancel culture” act like logical animals, that is, bearers of what the Greeks called logos?
How should scientific journals’ editors react to this culture, say, when a paper published by them gives rise to what has been named “cancellation”?
Can the latter be fair, just, rationally justified, morally good, etc.?
Is contemporary cancelation similar to past actions like the one portrayed in John 8:1-11 of stoning an adulterous woman, those that Nietzsche associates with herd behavior, etc.?
What is or how should one use terms like “rationality”, “logos” or other ones hardly distinguishable from them like “language”, “reason”, “science”, etc., especially in light of the fact that countless logics have been proposed?
Is the dispute about the number of correct logics a motivated dispute?
What is (if any) the relation of irrationality or shortness of logos with homophobia, sexism, racism, xenophobia, Nazism, communism, etc.?
Who or what has the power to define these terms?
Can a use of a derogatory predicate (say, “to be sexist”) be a violent one?
What is (if any) the relation between logic and non-violence or what Gandhi calls “Ahimsa”?