A crisis in the committee LP-1 causes a dispute between delegates
By Ishan Sigdel for TES MUN news
Kathmandu, August 9
A crisis in the committee LP-1 causes a dispute between delegates
By Ishan Sigdel for TES MUN news
Kathmandu, August 9
The GSL of the delegates kicks off today's committee, LP-1, which then moves on to a discussion of "foreign employment and corruption." The GSL began with Rekha Sharma, Prithivi Shubba Gurung, and Pushpa Kamal Dahal.
"How can Rekha Sharma's representative claim that she has been assisting in promoting opportunities for the less fortunate when she has been accused of violating human rights?" Subhas Chandra Newang's representative inquired.
The delegate was questioned with rage since Rekha Sharma's delegate had previously accused the delegate Subhas Chandra Newang of corruption without providing any evidence.
The representative of Rekha Sharma stated, "There is no proof of the delegate violating human rights, and the delegate is rather supporting them by doing social work. The Maoist Center and the delegate have been trying to figure out ways to decrease national issues."
The GSL was interrupted midway, and the crisis head appeared with the crisis.
The head of the crisis remarked, "The Aayog, which earlier claimed national parties were trying to increase the brain drain and foreign employment, was fake, and no party's involvement was found. This has brought upon the legislature how brain drain might be necessary to be controlled further."
The new problem unnerved the delegates, who then began accusing one another of corruption and complicity in illicit activities.
The representative of Arzu Rana said, "The bribe takers and illegal work participants should be first given their deserved punishment, like Mr. KP Sharma Oli."
Now that the delegates' attention was diverted from the situation, the delegates began to blame one another.
The representative for KP Sharma Oli said, "In the previous meeting with Nepali Congress, Arzu Rana, who was accused of corruption of 25 million dollars, was challenged to publicize income sources, but the delegate instead replied with a childish answer and didn't share the delegate's income sources."
Loud as the blows of the hammer, the voices of the delegates filled the atmosphere with constant allegations.