Authors: Baum, C. & Edwards, D.F.
Year of Publication: 1993
Publisher: Program in Occupational Therapy at Washington University School of Medicine
Type of Assessments:
Standardized
Performance-based
Criterion-referenced
Observation-based
Cost: Free (materials can cost money)
How to Access: https://clinicalportfolio.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/kitchen-task-assessment-score-sheet.pdf
Age: Adults
Diagnoses: Senile Dementia, Alzheimer's, conditions facing cognitive deficits
Setting: inpatient, outpatient, home health, community-based, transition programs
functional measure that records the level of cognitive support required by a person with cognitive dysfunction and allows clinicians to understand the level of support an individual needs to perform daily tasks
Initiation
Organization
Performing All Steps
Proper Sequence
Judgment and Safety,
Completion
Time: 15-20 mins
Group/Individual: Individual
Subtests: N/A
Instructions: Qualifying pretest of washing hands precedes assessment to determine minimum ability level.
Client is instructed and observed while making cooked pudding from a mix.
Administrator provides assistance necessary for successful experience.
Performance on subtests provides clinical information and strategies useful to caregiver
Materials:
scoring sheet
kitchen counter
pudding mix
saucepan
kitchen utensils
dishes
soap
paper towels
stove
refrigerator
sink
User Qualifications: N/A
How to Score: Scores are based on the level of independence the client has when completing the assigned task.
0 = independent
1 = verbal assistance)
2 = physical assistance
3 = totally incapable
Total score ranges from 0 to 18
Score Indications:
Higher scores indicate impaired performance.
Reliability:
Internal consistency: Cronbach's = .961
Interrater: .853 (total score) and .632 (category scores)
Validity:
Construct: Strong between MMSE & ACLS
Concurrent: Moderate to Strong - r = .60-.80 w/ MMSE, EFPT, & ACLS
Strengths:
Functionally relevant to adults and outlook on IADL management
Simple scoring system
The comment section allows for more subjective responses to the client's performance is helpful to pair with numerical data
Assesses each component independently and overall completion to determine which parts of the process may be particularly impaired
Inexpensive & easy administration
Weaknesses:
The task can be super complex and demanding for those with severe cognitive impairments
Requires access to a kitchen and cooking space
Limited psychometric research available
Asher, I. E. (2014). Asher’s occupational therapy assessment tools: An annotated index (4th ed.). AOTA Press.
Baum, C. & Edwards, D.F. (1993). Cognitive performance in senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type: The kitchen task assessment. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(5), 431-436. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.47.5.431