A. Formal analysis
This is the visual analysis part, an informed, effective discussion of the the Formal Qualities of art, line, shape, color, etc
The top markband descriptor reads: The work provides a consistent, insightful and informed identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the selected pieces.
B. Function and purpose
Why was the work made? What function does it have? An art work can have a purely expressive function or it may have a ceremonial or political or religious, function. Why was it made, what might it mean? For some art works this will be very important, others less so. The emphasis here is on an informed and appropriate interpretation. Go to Function and Purpose page for more on this topic.
Top markband descriptor reads : The work provides a consistent, insightful and informed analysis and demonstrates thorough understanding of the function and purpose of the selected pieces from at least two contrasting cultural contexts.
C. Cultural significance
Where and when was it made, what was happening at the time and place? An informed, appropriate consideration of work within a cultural context: i.e historical, geographical, religious and other relevant contexts.
D. Making connections and comparisons
The ability to make logical and coherent comparisons between the works discussed
E. Presentation and subject specific language
Using Art Vocabulary and terminology is always important. Balance of text and visuals, an clear, engaging visual presentation is desirable, layout is considered, writing is legible, artists names are spelled correctly, with sources cited and images referenced correctly. Go to Building Art Vocabulary and Referencing and Citing Sources
F. Making connection to own art practice
HL students reflect on how the work under consideration impacts, influences or otherwise connects to their own art making. This can be quite revelatory and meaningful for some students.
A look at HL REQUIREMENTS in more detail:
Criterion F. Making Connections to Own Art Making Practice ( HL only) 12 points possible
HL students reflect on how the work chosen for consideration in the CS has influenced their own development by identifying connections. This can be quite revelatory and meaningful for some students.
"To what extent does the candidate analyse and evaluate the outcomes of the comparative study investigation and on how this has influenced the student’s own development as an artist, identifying connections between one or more of the selected works and the student’s own art-making processes and practices?"- VA guide
Below, the individual mark band descriptors for criterion F CS Assessment Criteria
Here you can see a student example slide from an HL Comparative Study. Read through it to better understand how your own work might connect.