Language acquisition refers to the process through which humans acquire the capacity to perceive, produce, and use language. This complex process begins in infancy and continues throughout one's life, involving various stages and mechanisms that enable individuals to learn their native language(s). Understanding how individuals acquire language is fundamental to understanding the nature of human communication and the diversity of languages around the world.
Language acquisition is a complex process that has been studied through various theoretical frameworks. Behaviorist theories, such as Skinner's (1957) behaviorism, suggest that language learning is a result of conditioning and reinforcement. According to this view, children learn language through imitation and reinforcement from caregivers.
In contrast, nativist theories propose that humans are born with an innate capacity for language acquisition. Chomsky's (2007) concept of universal grammar is a prominent example of nativist theory, suggesting that children are born with a set of linguistic principles and structures that guide language learning. Nativist theories argue that the complexity of language acquisition cannot be solely attributed to environmental factors.
Interactionist theories emphasize the role of social interaction and cultural context in language development. Vygotsky's (1978) sociocultural theory, for example, highlights the importance of social interactions with more knowledgeable individuals in language learning. According to this view, language development is a collaborative process that occurs through communication and interaction with others.
Additionally, the Critical Period Hypothesis proposes that there is a biologically determined period during which language acquisition must occur for an individual to attain native-like proficiency (Penfield & Roberts, 1959; Lenneberg, 1967). This hypothesis suggests that there is a critical period in early childhood during which the brain is most receptive to language input, and if language learning does not occur within this window, it becomes much more difficult to achieve native-like fluency later in life. With very limited success, Curtiss et al. (1974) worked to teach language to an isolated child ("Genie") beyond the so-called critical period.
These theoretical frameworks offer different perspectives on how humans acquire language, highlighting the interplay between biological, cognitive, social, and environmental factors in the development of linguistic competence.
Prelinguistic development encompasses the period before a child begins to use words to communicate. During this stage, infants develop essential skills that lay the foundation for language acquisition. Prelinguistic communication skills include various forms of nonverbal communication, such as eye contact, facial expressions, and body movements. These early forms of communication are crucial for establishing social connections and developing language skills (Locke, 1993).
Vocalizations and babbling are important aspects of prelinguistic development. Infants begin making cooing sounds and vowel-like sounds in the first few months of life. This stage of vocalization helps infants practice controlling their vocal cords and developing the muscles needed for speech production (Oller, 2000). Babbling typically starts around six months of age and involves the repetition of consonant-vowel combinations (e.g., "bababa"). Babbling is considered a universal phenomenon in language development and is believed to be a precursor to spoken language (Oller & Eilers, 1988).
Gestures and nonverbal communication also play a significant role in prelinguistic development. Infants begin using gestures, such as pointing, waving, and reaching, to communicate their needs and intentions before they can speak. These early gestures help infants interact with others and convey meaning, laying the groundwork for the development of more complex language skills (Iverson & Goldin-Meadow, 2005). Gesture use is closely related to language development, and studies have shown that children who use more gestures early in life tend to have larger vocabularies and better language skills later on (Rowe & Goldin-Meadow, 2009).
Phonological development refers to the process through which children acquire the ability to produce and perceive speech sounds in their native language. This process begins in infancy and continues throughout childhood, involving the acquisition of phonological rules and patterns that govern sound production in a given language. One of the key aspects of phonological development is the acquisition of speech sounds, which typically begins with the production of vowel-like sounds and progresses to the production of consonant sounds (Ferguson & Farwell, 1975).
As children continue to develop their phonological skills, they begin to learn the phonological rules and patterns of their native language. These rules govern how sounds are combined to form words and how different sounds can change depending on their position in a word or sentence. For example, in English, the sound /k/ at the beginning of a word is often pronounced as /k/, as in "cat," but it can also be pronounced as /s/, as in "cent," depending on the following vowel sound.
During the early stages of phonological development, children may make errors and simplifications in their speech as they learn to produce the complex sounds of their native language. These errors can include substituting one sound for another (e.g., saying "wabbit" instead of "rabbit"), omitting certain sounds or syllables (e.g., saying "nana" instead of "banana"), or simplifying the pronunciation of complex consonant clusters (e.g., saying "fum" instead of "thumb"). These errors are a normal part of the phonological development process and typically resolve as children's speech skills continue to mature.
Lexical development refers to the process by which individuals acquire and expand their vocabulary. It is a crucial aspect of language development that begins in infancy and continues throughout life. Vocabulary growth involves the gradual accumulation of words and their meanings, which is essential for effective communication (Bloom, 2000).
One important aspect of lexical development is word learning, which involves acquiring the meanings of new words. Children employ various strategies to learn new words, including fast mapping and word association. Fast mapping is a cognitive process that allows individuals, particularly children, to quickly acquire the meaning of a new word after a single exposure or a few exposures. It involves creating a temporary link between the new word and its referent or concept, enabling the individual to use the word in context even though they may not have a full understanding of its meaning (Carey, 1978). For example, a child might hear the word "elephant" for the first time while reading a book and quickly associate it with the image of an elephant in the book.
Word association, on the other hand, involves linking a new word to words or concepts that are already known or familiar to the individual. This process helps in consolidating the new word's meaning in memory by connecting it to existing knowledge (Roux, 2003). For instance, if a child learns the word "horse" and already knows the word "cow," they might associate "horse" with "cow" to help remember the new word's meaning.
Categorization and concept formation are also integral to lexical development. One way this occurs is through learning some types of words before other types of words. For instance, according to the natural partitions hypothesis, we learn nouns before verbs. This is because nouns refer to concrete, easily observable objects or entities, which are conceptually more basic and accessible to infants compared to the abstract concepts represented by verbs (Gentner, 1982). As children acquire new words, they learn to categorize objects, actions, and concepts based on similarities and differences. This process helps in organizing and expanding their vocabulary by grouping words that share common attributes (Waxman & Markow, 1995). Additionally, concept formation allows children to develop a deeper understanding of the world around them by forming mental representations of abstract ideas and relationships between words (Mandler, 1992).
Morphological and syntactic development in language acquisition involves the gradual mastery of grammatical structures and rules. One key aspect is the acquisition of grammatical morphemes and inflections, which are elements added to words to indicate aspects such as tense, number, and possession. For example, English-speaking children typically start using "-ing" for present progressive tense (e.g., "I am playing"), "-s" for plural nouns (e.g., "dogs"), and "'s" for possession (e.g., "Mommy's book") around the age of two (Brown, 1973).
Another crucial aspect of morphological and syntactic development is the development of sentence structure and word order. Children initially start with simple, telegraphic speech (e.g., "Want cookie"), gradually acquiring more complex sentence structures as they develop (Bloom, 1970). They also learn the rules governing word order in sentences, such as subject-verb-object (SVO) order in English, which varies across languages (Slobin, 1985).
Additionally, children learn to use grammatical forms for asking questions, expressing negation, and other functions. For example, they learn to use auxiliary verbs like "do" for forming questions (e.g., "Do you want to play?") and negative structures like "not" (e.g., "I do not want to play") (Brown, 1973). This development of grammatical forms is essential for expressing a wide range of meanings and functions in language.
Furthermore, the development of morphological and syntactic skills is closely linked to word association and learning grammar. As children acquire new words and expand their vocabulary, they also learn how these words are used in sentences and how they relate to other words. This process of word association helps children understand and use grammatical structures correctly (Brown & Berko, 1960).
Pragmatic development refers to the acquisition of social language skills that enable effective communication in various social contexts. It involves understanding and using language in ways that are appropriate to the social context and the communicative intent. One key aspect of pragmatic development is the ability to engage in turn-taking and maintain conversational exchanges. Children learn to take turns in conversations, respond appropriately to others' contributions, and understand when it is their turn to speak.
Another important aspect of pragmatic development is the ability to understand and use non-literal language, such as sarcasm, irony, and indirect speech. This involves recognizing when speakers are using language figuratively or to convey meanings that are not explicitly stated. For example, understanding sarcasm requires recognizing the discrepancy between the literal meaning of the words and the intended meaning (Winner, 1988). Mastery of these aspects of language is crucial for successful social interactions and effective communication.
Pragmatic development is also closely linked to the development of Theory of Mind (ToM), which is the ability to attribute mental states, such as beliefs, desires, and intentions, to oneself and others (Astington & Jenkins, 1999). ToM development enables children to understand that people may have different perspectives and beliefs, which is essential for interpreting and responding appropriately to the intentions and emotions of others in social interactions.
Multilingualism refers to the ability of an individual to speak two or more languages. Bilingualism, specifically, is the ability to speak two languages fluently, while multilingualism extends this to three or more languages. Language acquisition in a multilingual context can occur from an early age, where children are exposed to and learn multiple languages simultaneously. Research suggests that early exposure to multiple languages can lead to successful bilingual or multilingual development, with children showing the ability to differentiate between languages and acquire their grammar and vocabulary (Genesee, 2004).
Second language acquisition (SLA) refers to the process of learning a new language after acquiring one's first language. This process can occur at any age, but it is often studied in the context of adults learning a new language. SLA research examines various factors that influence language learning, such as age of acquisition, language aptitude, motivation, and learning strategies (Ellis, 2008). Studies have shown that while children tend to achieve native-like proficiency in a second language more easily, adults can also achieve high levels of proficiency with sufficient exposure and practice (Krashen, 1982).
Overall, multilingualism, whether acquired from an early age or later in life, offers cognitive, cultural, and social benefits. It enhances cognitive flexibility, improves communication skills, and provides access to different cultures and perspectives. Understanding the processes involved in bilingual and multilingual language acquisition is essential for educators, policymakers, and individuals seeking to learn new languages and navigate multilingual environments.
Language acquisition differences encompass a range of variations in the typical development of language skills among individuals. Some children experience language delays or disorders, which can manifest as difficulties in acquiring language skills at the expected rate or in the typical manner. Specific Language Impairment (SLI) is one such disorder characterized by significant and unexplained difficulties in language acquisition despite normal development in other areas (Leonard, 2014). Children with SLI may have trouble with grammar, vocabulary, and understanding and producing complex sentences.
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is another condition that can be associated with language difficulties. Individuals with ASD may exhibit a range of language challenges, including delays in language development, echolalia (repeating words or phrases), and difficulty understanding and using non-literal language (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The language difficulties experienced by individuals with ASD can vary widely, with some individuals having strong language skills and others experiencing significant challenges.
Additionally, there are individuals who are nonverbal or have limited verbal communication abilities. These individuals may use alternative forms of communication, such as gestures, pictures, or assistive technology, to communicate their needs, thoughts, and feelings (Mirenda, 2003). Understanding and supporting the communication needs of nonverbal individuals is essential for ensuring that they can participate fully in social interactions and access educational and community resources.
Understanding language acquisition differences and the specific language difficulties associated with conditions like SLI, ASD, and nonverbal communication is crucial for early identification and intervention. Early intervention can help mitigate the impact of language delays and disorders, improve language skills, and enhance overall communication and social interactions for individuals affected by these conditions.
In the digital age, technology has significantly influenced language acquisition, providing new tools and methods for learning. Technology has made language learning more accessible, convenient, and engaging for learners of all ages. Digital tools, such as language learning apps like Duolingo, Babbel, and Rosetta Stone, offer interactive and personalized learning experiences that cater to individual learning styles and preferences. These digital tools feature games, quizzes, and interactive lessons that make language learning more enjoyable and effective. They also allow for real-time feedback and progress tracking, enabling learners to monitor their improvement and stay motivated.
However, the rise of digital tools in language acquisition also presents ethical considerations and challenges. Concerns include data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the commodification of education. Additionally, there are concerns about the quality and accuracy of content provided by some language learning apps, as well as the potential for over-reliance on technology to replace traditional language learning methods. Despite these challenges, the use of digital tools for language acquisition continues to grow. It is important to address ethical considerations and ensure that technology is used in a way that enhances, rather than hinders, language learning.
The Worksheet and Study Guide are for your own individual study. These are not for a grade.
Define language acquisition.
Distinguish between the behaviorist approach, nativist (innate) perspective, and the sociocultural theory.
Explain the critical period hypothesis.
Discuss prelinguistic development and phonological development.
Discuss lexical development, including fast mapping, word association, and the natural partitions hypothesis.
Discuss morphological and syntactic development.
Discuss pragmatic development, including the Theory of Mind.
Discuss bilingualism and multilingualism.
Discuss second language acquisition.
Discuss language acquisition differences, including issues related to Specific Language Impairment, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and being nonverbal.
Discuss issues related to language acquisition in the Digital Age.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311-1320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. MIT Press.
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. MIT Press.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press.
Brown, R., & Berko, J. (1960). Word association and the acquisition of grammar. Child Development, 31(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126377
Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. Linguistic theory and psychological reality In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264-293). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2007). Language and mind. Cambridge University Press.
Curtiss, S., Fromkin, V. A., Krashen, S. D., Rigler, D., & Rigler, M. (1974). The development of language in Genie: A case of language acquisition beyond the 'critical period'. Brain and Language, 1(1), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(74)90027
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51(2), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.2307/412864
Genesee, F. (2004). What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students? In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 547-576). Blackwell Publishing.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16(5), 367-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01542.x
Leonard, L. B. (2014). Children with specific language impairment. MIT Press.
Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34(3), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2003/017)
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj II (Ed.) Language development, Volume 2: Language, thought and culture (pp. 301-334). Lawrence Eribaum.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Wiley.
Locke, J. L. (1993). The child's path to spoken language. Harvard University Press.
Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.587
Oller, D. K. (2000). The emergence of the speech capacity. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (1988). The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development, 59(2), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130323
Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton University Press.
Roux, P. W. (2003). Words in the mind: Exploring the relationship between word association and lexical development. Polyglossia, 24, 80-91.
Rowe, M. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00764.x
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Copley Publishing Group.
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. Erlbaum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 257–302. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1995.1016
Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children's understanding of metaphor and irony. Harvard University Press.