The word paleoanthropology can be broken into three parts: paleo, anthropo, and logy. Paleo means ancient, anthropo means human, and logy means study. If you put that together, you get paleoanthropology, which is the study of ancient humans.
There are several methods used by paleoanthropologists when studying ancient humans.
Paleoanthropologists often study fossils, which are the remains of ancient plants and animals. The fossil record refers to the amassed collection of preserved remains and traces of ancient organisms found in geological formations, representing the total body of fossil evidence available for scientific study. There are a few types of fossils:
Trace fossils: foot tracks, bite marks on bones, nests (with eggs), and coprolite (fossilized poop)
Mold fossils: animal or plant dies and the mud around it quickly makes a mold of its shape
Resin fossils: animal or plant is trapped in the resin of a plant. A specific type of resin fossil is an amber inclusion, in which an animal's remains are preserved in amber. This type of fossil was popularized in the film Jurassic Park.
Body fossils: animal whose body underwent a process of permineralization, in which minerals, such as silica or calcite, gradually replace teeth and bones over time.
Key figures and pivotal fossil discoveries in paleoanthropology include Raymond Dart's (1925) identification of the Taung Child (Australopithecus africanus) in South Africa, Eugene Dubois's (1894) uncovering of Homo erectus remains in Java, Mary Leakey's discoveries of early hominin footprints and significant findings in Tanzania (refer to Leakey and Hay, 1979), and Louis and Richard Leakey's extensive fossil discoveries in East Africa (Morell, 1995), along with the Neanderthal fossils in Europe. These landmark contributions have collectively deepened our understanding of human evolution.
Paleoanthropologists use a variety of dating methods when trying to discern the age of a fossil or other remnants from past humans, such as tools. We'll cover this topic in much greater detail during the final course unit, which is on archaeology. For now, we can explore some of the basics of dating, including the distinction between absolute and relative dating. Absolute dating provides a specific numerical age for something, whereas relative dating establishes where something fits within a chronological sequence of events or objects. As an easy example, consider a phone. If you found a first generation iPhone, it's pretty easy to figure out how old it is since we know it was created in 2007. That would be absolute dating. Now, imagine you found a really old flip phone, but you don't know when it was made or how old it is. Through relative dating, you would know it's older than an iPhone, but newer than a landline phone technology. You might not know its exact age, but you can place it within a range of other objects for which you do know their age.
There are various forms of absolute and relative dating. Again, we'll explore these in greater detail later, but here are a few of their types.
Absolute Dating
Radiocarbon Dating (Carbon-14): Measures the decay rate of carbon-14 isotopes in organic materials like bone or charcoal to determine ages; effective for dating materials up to approximately 50,000 years old.
Potassium-Argon Dating (K-Ar): Evaluates the decay of potassium-40 isotopes to argon-40 in volcanic rocks or minerals, providing ages for volcanic eruptions or associated fossil-bearing layers; useful for dating volcanic rocks and associated fossil layers ranging from thousands to millions of years old.
Relative Dating
Stratigraphy: Relies on the principle of superposition, where older layers of sediment or rock are found beneath younger layers, establishing a relative chronology of events or artifacts within a site.
Biostratigraphy (Fossil Succession): Uses the principle of fossil succession, where specific fossils with known evolutionary ages correlate with rock layers or sedimentary deposits, aiding in the relative dating of geological or archaeological materials.
You may remember from Chapter 2, Edward Tyson (1699) compared the anatomy of what he called a pygmie, monkey, ape, and human. While there is some confusion regarding what he actually compared, he formalized a process of comparative anatomy, which is the study of the physical similarities and differences between species, including humans and our ancestors.
There are some significant differences when comparing Homo sapiens with subtribe Panina related to bipedalism. Refer to the list below, as well as the pictures. Remember, Panina includes bonobos and chimpanzees, our closest living relatives.
Humans have an S-shaped spine curvature, which includes the cervical (neck), thoracic (upper back), and lumbar (lower back) regions. This curvature helps maintain balance and stability while standing and walking.
There are also several differences regarding the pelvis, which is the bony structure connecting the spine to the lower limbs.
Pelvic Shape
Homo sapiens: bowl shaped, which provides a stable platform for the upper body and helps support the weight.
Panina: narrow and elongated, which provides flexibility for climbing and a narrower base for quadrupedal walking.
Sacrum (triangular bone at the base of the spine, connecting to the pelvis)
Homo sapiens: wide, which helps to distribute the weight of the upper body to the pelvic girdle.
Panina: narrow, which allows for a more flexible spine during climbing and quadrupedal walking.
Ilium (Upper Hip Bone)
Homo sapiens: short and wide, which supports the lower back and provides stability during bipedal locomotion.
Panina: elongated and flatter, which facilitates muscle attachments for climbing and knuckle-walking.
Hip Joint Orientation
Homo sapiens: laterally oriented for stability, which allows for efficient weight-bearing and minimizes side-to-side swaying.
Panina: more anteriorly oriented for flexibility: Provides greater flexibility in the hip for climbing and quadrupedal locomotion.
Another significant difference is the bicondylar angle, which is the angle between the femur (thigh bone) and the knee joint. In humans, this angle is greater than in non-bipedal primates, allowing for a more stable knee joint during upright walking (Shefelbine et al., 2002).
Homo sapiens and subtribe Panina
Multon et al. (2012)
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is a molecule that encodes the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms. DNA is in the shape of a "double-helix" containing two spirals that go around each other. These spirals consist of nucleotides. There are four of them: A, C, T, and G. The nucleotides of each strand of DNA are bonded to each other, with As and Ts going together and Cs and Gs going together. The human genome contains about three billion of these pairings. Only one out of every thousand nucleotides varies. In other words, all humans have 99.9% the same genetic makeup as all other humans (Herbes-Sommers, 2003). Genes are the segments of DNA that contain information about heredity.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the genetic material found in a cell's mitochondria, which are the energy-producing structures within cells. Unlike nuclear DNA, which is inherited from both parents, mtDNA is passed down exclusively from the individual who provided the egg during reproduction. The Out of Africa hypothesis posits that anatomically modern humans originated in Africa and subsequently migrated to populate other regions. By analyzing variations in mtDNA among diverse populations, researchers trace maternal lineages and reconstruct migratory patterns. Comparisons of mtDNA sequences provide insights into the common ancestry and divergence of human populations over time, supporting the notion of a single African origin for Homo sapiens (Cann et al., 1987).
There are some traits that we can easily assign to genes, such as Mendelian traits governed by a single gene locus. Mendelian traits have only two possible variations of a gene (one dominant, and one recessive). These traits follow predictable inheritance patterns, like earlobe attachment (attached or free), cheek dimples (present or absent), and the ability to roll the tongue (rolling or non-rolling). These characteristics are often explained by the presence or absence of specific alleles at a particular gene location.
Not all traits are solely determined by genetics; some result from complex interactions between genes and the environment. For instance, variations in skin color are influenced by multiple genes and environmental factors like sun exposure (Jablonski, 2004). Genes and environment also work together to influence our weight, height, and body mass index (Dubois et al., 2012). The connections between genetics and behavioral traits, including intelligence and personality, are unclear.
Using DNA, we can investigate our inheritance of traits and explore the degrees of closeness in our relationships with other species.
Since we're studying ancient humans, now is a good time to familiarize ourselves with some of the basic language used when describing historical periods. We will use common abbreviations for millions of years ago (mya) and thousands of years ago (kya).
The geologic time scale is a chronological framework that divides Earth's history into distinct intervals based on significant geological events. Just as scientists have organized all life into a classification, we've done the same thing with time by organizing history into periods. We are currently living in the third "age" (the Meghalayan) of the second "epoch" (Holocene) of the third "period" (the Quaternary) of the third "era" (the Cenozoic) of the fourth "eon" (the Phanerozoic). Don't worry, that won't be on a test.
Again, we are currently living in the epoch Holocene. Take note of the Holocene below as well as the four epochs that preceded it.
Oligocene: 33.9 to 23 mya
Emergence of early primates
*Apes split from Old World monkeys (25-30 mya)
Miocene: 23 to 5.3 mya
Early primates and divergence of hominoids.
*Subtribe Hominina split from subtribe Panina containing the chimpanzees and Bonobos (7 mya)
Pliocene:5.3 to 2.6 mya
Emergence of hominins and early hominin diversity
*Bipedalism (4-6 mya)
Pleistocene: 2.6 mya to 11.700 kya
Diversification of hominin species, glaciations, and adaptation to various environments.
Roughly corresponds with the Paleolithic archaeological time scale, also known as the Old Stone Age.
Holocene: 11.7 kya to present
Rise of Homo sapiens, development of agriculture, and the establishment of complex societies.
Now let's consider the classic archaeological time scale originally created by C.J. Thomsen (1836) and since refined by other scientists.
Stone Age: Approximately 2.6 mya to 4 kya
Bronze Age: Approximately 3300 to 1200 BCE
Iron Age: Approximately 1200 BCE to 500 CE
The Stone Age has since been divided into the following categories:
Paleolithic (Old Stone Age): Approximately 2.6 mya to 10 kya (roughly corresponds with the Pleistocene epoch above). The Paleolithic is also sub-divided.
Lower Paleolithic: Approximately 2.6 mya to 300 kya
Middle Paleolithic: 300 kya to 30-40 kya
Upper Paleolithic: 30-40 kya to 10 kya
Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age): Approximately 10 kya to 8 kya
Neolithic (New Stone Age): Approximately 8 kya to 4 kya
We'll explore the archaeological time scales in more detail below when we study tool use and again during the archaeology unit of the course.
Another time scale to be aware of is the distinction between historical and prehistoric. Historic refers to all history since the beginning of writing. Prehistoric refers to all history before writing. The historical time period is generally considered to start around 3,200 BCE (with the invention of cuneiform in Mesopotamia) but varies depending on the region.
In order to understand how these species are related to each other, we need to know what historical time periods they existed in and what their characteristics distinguish them in our shared evolutionary history.
Chapter 4 discussed the various genera and species of subtribe Hominina. Some of these may be referred to as transitional forms as they have evolutionary transitions. A transitional form is a fossilized organism that displays characteristics of both ancestral and derived forms, illustrating gradual changes in evolutionary lineages. These species are "in between" since they have characteristics similar to species before and after themselves. An evolutionary transition marks a shift in traits or characteristics over evolutionary time. Review the chart in Chapter 4 and the species below, along with their evolutionary transitions.
Ardipithecus ramidus (~4.4 mya)
Represents a transitional form between late Miocene apes and the Australopithecus genus, offering insights into bipedal locomotion.
Australopithecus afarensis (e.g., "Lucy") (3.9 - 2.9 mya)
Illustrates further adaptations to bipedalism and the transition from arboreal to terrestrial environments.
Australopithecus africanus (3.3 - 2.1 mya)
Marks continued adaptations to bipedalism and provides evidence of an expanding hominin diversity in Africa.
Homo habilis (2.3 - 1.6 mya)
Marks the transition from Australopithecus to the Homo genus, showing increased brain size and tool use.
Homo erectus (2- 0.1 mya)
Represents the first hominin species to migrate out of Africa, displaying advanced tool technology and larger brain size.
Homo sapiens (0.3 mya)
Represents the emergence of anatomically modern humans, characterized by advanced cognitive abilities, complex societies, and widespread migration.
We explored various proto- and archaic-humans in Chapter 4. How are modern humans related to them? Are we descended from them? The human family tree and the various relationships between the species of subtribe Hominina is the subject of much research and debate among paleoanthropologists.
The exact relationships among the species of subtribe Hominina are still subjects of ongoing research and debate in paleoanthropology. Homo sapiens are believed to have evolved from earlier hominin species. Among the potential direct ancestors are Homo heidelbergensis, a species considered a common ancestor of both Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, with fossils found in Africa and Europe. Homo antecessor, identified through evidence from Atapuerca in Spain, is considered an early precursor to both Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) are also part of the evolutionary story, representing a closely related group with evidence of interbreeding with Homo sapiens. The human evolutionary path is complex, and ongoing research continues to refine our understanding of the specific ancestors leading to Homo sapiens. The other Homo species not listed here can be considered siblings or cousins to modern Homo sapiens. The Australopithecus and other proto-homo genera and species can be thought of as more distant cousins.
Just as we study hominin biological evolution, we can also study behavioral evolution. We'll explore some of these issues in greater depth as we progress through the course.
Technology refers to the practical application of knowledge and tools to solve problems or achieve goals. Our ancient ancestors and relatives of subtribe Hominina used various stone tools. Review the significant milestones in the history of tool use below.
Early Stone Tools (Lower Paleolithic)
Homo habilis and Oldowan tools (Approximately 2.6 to 1.7 mya )
Acheulean Tradition (Lower Paleolithic)
Homo erectus and the Acheulean tools (Approximately 1.7 mya to 200 kya)
Transition to Middle Paleolithic
Homo heidelbergensis and the Mousterian tools (Approximately 200 kya to 40 kya)
Upper Paleolithic Innovations
Homo sapiens and advanced stone tools, bone tools, and symbolic artifacts in Upper Paleolithic cultures (Approximately 40 kya to 10 kya)
We'll explore additional tools and technology as we continue in the future units of the course.
Since there is an entire course unit on cultural anthropology, we won't spend much time here. For now, you should be familiar with the following milestones.
Religious and Philosophical Traditions:
Development of early belief systems and symbolic expressions.
Cultural practices related to burial, rituals, and symbolic behavior.
Time Range: Difficult to pinpoint, but evidence of symbolic behavior from the Paleolithic onwards.
Symbolic Representation
Evidence of symbolic representation in the form of cave art, body ornamentation, or other non-verbal symbolic communication.
Time Range: Upper Paleolithic period, approximately 40 kya to 10 kya.
Agricultural Revolution
Transition from nomadic lifestyles to settled farming.
Impacts on human diet, settlement patterns, and social structures.
Time Range: Approximately 10 kya to 8 kya.
Formation of Complex Societies
Emergence of larger and more organized hominin communities.
Development of social hierarchies within early human groups.
Time Range: Varies, but notable developments from 12 kya to 4 kya.
Urbanization
Growth of early settlements and communities.
Impact on resource utilization and social dynamics.
Time Range: Depending on region, significant urbanization from 5 kya.
Trade Networks
Exchange of tools, raw materials, and cultural artifacts among early human groups.
Connections and interactions between different hominin populations.
Time Range: Extends throughout prehistoric periods, with increased trade from 10 kya.
Since there is an entire course unit on linguistics, we won't spend much time here. For now, you should be familiar with the following milestones.
Emergence of Hominin Communication
Development of basic communication systems among early hominins.
Use of non-verbal cues and gestures.
Time Range: Varies, but early forms of communication likely existed several million years ago.
Early Hominin Vocalizations
Evolution of early vocalizations for communication.
Limited but increasing complexity in vocal expression.
Time Range: Over the course of several million years, with more refined vocalizations in later hominin species.
Homo neanderthalensis and Language Development
Neanderthals were probably the first to use human language. Neanderthal remains found in Palestine showed a developed hyoid bone, which moves the tongue and is necessary for speech communication (Arensburg & Tiller, 1991; D'Anastasio et al., 2013). Fossilized skulls and endocasts (casts of the brain's interior) of early hominins provide insights into brain size and organization. Neanderthals had developed Broca's and Wrnicke's areas. The Broca area is a part of the brain associated with language production and speech formation, and the Wernicke area is a part of the brain associated with language comprehension).
Time Range: Homo neanderthalensis existed from approximately 1.9 mya to 143 kya.
Transition to Homo sapiens
Time Range: Homo sapiens emerged around 300 kya years ago, with the development of complex language likely evolving over tens of thousands of years.
The global dispersal of humans began about 60-80 kya. For most of Homo sapiens history (over two thirds), we were a dark skinned species living in Africa. As we expanded beyond Africa, our skin tones slowly adapted to the new environments over the course of 20-50 kya. Human evolution and migration are ongoing projects as humans continue to move and adapt with each generation to the environment. Refer to the map below that illustrates the movement of H. sapiens, H. neanderthalensis, and H. erectus.
Here is a recap of the map:
Homo erectus was throughout Africa, the Arabian peninsula, South and East Asia, and Indonesia.
Homo neanderthalensis was throughout Europe and West Asia.
Notable Homo sapiens origins and migrations
200 kya began life in East Africa
100 kya traveled across Arabian peninsula
40 kya arrived in Europe
70 kya arrived in South Asia
50 kya arrived in Australia
15 kya crossed the Bering Straits from Asia to North America
12 kya populated North America
I recognize that the dates in the map are different than the dates I provided above and elsewhere. Since the fossil record is incomplete, dates should always be thought of as ranges of time rather than being very specific.
The Worksheet and Study Guide are for your own individual study. These are not for a grade.
Distinguish between fossils and the fossil record.
Distinguish between the types of fossils, and include their related material such as coprolite, amber inclusions, and the process of permineralization.
Distinguish between absolute and relative dating and the provided types of each.
Define comparative anatomy, and describe some of the differences between modern humans and subtribe Panina.
Describe DNA, including mtDNA, genes, and Mendelian traits.
Distinguish between the relevant geological and archaeological time scales for subtribe Hominina. (No, there will not be test questions about the smallest details here. As long as you've spent some time exploring these, you will be fine. Do take note of the asterisks in the section on geological time scales.)
Distinguish between history and prehistory.
Distinguish between transitional forms and evolutionary transitions. Identify the relevant transitional forms for our study of Homo sapiens, as well as their evolutionary transitions and general time periods.
Identify the species from subtribe Hominina that are considered potential direct ancestors of modern humans.
Define technology, and describe the technologies used by species from subtribe Hominina during the Old Stone Age.
Review the cultural and linguistic developmental milestones.
Identify how long ago humans expanded beyond Africa and how long ago humans reached North America.
Cann, R. L., Stoneking, M., & Wilson, A. C. (1987). Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature, 325(6099), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/325031a0
Dart, R. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of South Africa. Nature 115, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1038/115195a0
Dubois, L., Ohm Kyvik, K., Girard, M., Tatone-Tokuda, F., Pérusse, D., Hjelmborg, J., Skytthe, A., Rasmussen, F., Wright, M. J., Lichtenstein, P., & Martin, N. G. (2012). Genetic and environmental contributions to weight, height, and BMI from birth to 19 years of age: An international study of over 12,000 twin pairs. PloS one, 7(2), e30153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030153
Dubois, M. E. F. T. (1894). Pithecanthropus erectus: Eine menschenähnliche Übergangsform aus Java. Landesdruckerei.
Herbes-Sommers, C., Strain, T., H., & Smith, L. (Directors). (2003). Race - The power of an illusion: Episode 1 - The difference between us. [Film]. California Newsreel.
Jablonski, N. G. (2004). The evolution of human skin and skin color. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 585–623. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143955
Leakey, M., & Hay, R. (1979). Pliocene footprints in the Laetolil Beds at Laetoli, northern Tanzania. Nature 278, 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/278317a0
Morell V. (1995). Ancestral passions: The Leakey family and the quest for humankind's beginnings. Simon & Schuster.
Multon, F., Nicolas, G., Crompton, R. H., D’Août, K., & Berillon, G. (2012). Anthropometry in bipedal locomotion: The link between anatomy and gait. In: Preedy, V. (eds) Handbook of Anthropometry. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1788-1_182
Shefelbine, S. J., Tardieu, C., & Carter, D. R. (2002). Development of the femoral bicondylar angle in hominid bipedalism. Bone, 30(5), 765-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00700-7
Thompson, C. J. (1836). Ledetraad til nordisk oldkyndighed. Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab.
Tyson, E. (1699). Orang-outang, sive Homo Sylvestris: Or, the anatomy of a pygmie compared with that of a monkey, an ape, and a man. Thomas Bennet and Daniel Brown.