Commentaires
La monophylie des Lissamphibiens fait régulièrement débat, il n’est pas totalement impossible qu’ils soient paraphylétiques et regroupent un ensemble de lignées ayant retenu des caractères ancestraux de Tétrapodes.
Références
Fong JJ, Brown JM, Fujita MK & Boussau B (2012) A phylogenomic approach to vertebrate phylogeny supports a turtle-archosaur affinity and a possible paraphyletic Lissamphibia. PLoS ONE, 7: e48990
Hime PM, Lemmon AR, Moriarty Lemmon EC, Prendini E, Brown JM, Thomson RC, Kratovil JD, Noonan BP, Pyron RA, Peloso PLV et al. (2020) Phylogenomics reveals ancient gene tree discordance in the amphibian tree of life. Systematic Biology, syaa034
Irisarri I, Baurain D, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Sire JY, Kupfer A, Petersen J, Jarek M, Meyer A, Vences M & Philippe H (2017) Phylotranscriptomic consolidation of the jawed vertebrate timetree. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1: 1370-1378
Shen XX, Liang D, Feng YJ, Chen MY & Zhang P (2013) A versatile and highly efficient toolkit including 102 nuclear markers for Vertebrate phylogenomics, tested by resolving the higher level relationships of the Caudata. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30: 2235-2248
Shen XX, Hittinger CT & Rokas A (2017) Contentious relationships in phylogenomic studies can be driven by a handful of genes. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1: 126
Siu-Ting K, Torres-Sánchez M, San Mauro D, Wilcockson D, Wilkinson M, Pisani D, O'Connelle MJ & Creevey CJ (2019) Inadvertent paralog inclusion drives artefactual topologies and timetree estimates in phylogenomics. Molecular Biology and Evolution: msz067
Torres-Sánchez M, Creevey CJ, Kornobis E, Gower DJ, Wilkinson M & San Mauro D (2018) Multi-tissue transcriptomes of caecilian amphibians highlight incomplete knowledge of vertebrate gene families. Dna Research, doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsy034