Commentaires
« entognathes » - Il n'y a pas de consensus ni sur la monophylie des anciens Entognathes, ni sur les relations entre les trois taxons de ce groupe. Dans le doute nous les considérons paraphylétiques, ce qui est l'hypothèse la plus probable.
« aptérygotes » - Il est bien établi que les anciens Aptérygotes sont paraphylétiques. Le terme « thysanoures », qui désignait auparavant à la fois les Archéognathes et les Zygentomes, ne désigne désormais plus que les Zygentomes.
Paléoptères - Un petit doute subsiste sur la monophylie des Paléoptères, mais toutes les études récentes (dont les études dédiées) concluent à leur monophylie.
Polynéoptères - Les relations présentées ici ne font pas totalement consensus mais ce sont celles qui sont très majoritairement retrouvées, en particulier dans les études dédiées.
Blattariens - Les Blattariens comprennent les Blattoptères et les Isoptères, mais les Isoptères sont assez probablement des Blattoptères dérivés (les Blattoptères au sens traditionnel seraient donc paraphylétiques).
« paranéoptères » - Il y a un très sérieux doute sur la monophylie des anciens Paranéoptères, que nous considérons paraphylétiques ici.
Psocodiens - Les Psocodiens comprennent les Psocoptères et les Phthiraptères, mais les Phthiraptères sont peut-être des Psocoptères dérivés (les Psocoptères au sens traditionnel seraient donc paraphylétiques).
Coléoptéridiens - Les Coléoptéridiens comprennent les Coléoptères et les Strepsiptères, mais il y a un petit doute sur le fait que les Strepsiptères soient des Coléoptères dérivés (les Coléoptères au sens traditionnel pourraient donc être paraphylétiques).
Références
Beutel RG, Yavorskaya MI, Mashimo Y, Fukui M & Meusemann K (2017) The phylogeny of Hexapoda (Arthropoda) and the evolution of megadiversity. Proceedings of Arthropodan Embryological Society of Japan, 51: 1-15
Boussau B, Walton Z, Delgado JA, Collantes F, Beani L, Stewart IJ, Cameron SA, Whitfield JB, Johnston JS, Holland PWH et al. (2014) Strepsitera, phylogenomics and the long branch attraction problem. PLoS ONE 9: e107709
Chesters D (2017) Construction of a species-level tree of life for the insects and utility in taxonomic profiling. Systematic Biology, 66: 426-439
Chesters D (2019) The phylogeny of insects in the data-driven era. Systematic Entomology, doi: 10.1111/syen.12414
Dell’Ampio E, Meusemann K, Szucsich NU, Peters RS, Meyer B, Borner J, Petersen M, Aberer AJ, Stamatakis A, Walzl MG et al. (2013) Decisive data sets in phylogenomics: Lessons from studies on the phylogenetic relationships of primarily wingless insects. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31: 239-249
Edgecombe GD & Legg DA (2014) Origins and early evolution of Arthropods. Frontiers in Palaeontology, 57: 457-468
Evangelista DA, Wipfler B, Béthoux O, Donath A, Fujita M, Kohli MK, Legendre F, Liu S, Machida R, Misof B et al. (2019) An integrative phylogenomic approach illuminates the evolutionary history of cockroaches and termites (Blattodea). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286: 20182076
Freitas F, Mello B & Schrago CG (2018) Multispecies coalescent analysis confirms standing phylogenetic instability in Hexapoda. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 31: 1623-1631
Giribet G & Edgecombe GD (2012) Reevaluating the Arthropod tree of life. Annual Reviews of Entomology, 54: 167-186
Giribet G & Edgecombe GD (2019) The phylogeny and evolutionary history of Arthropods. Current Biology, 29: R592-R602
Johnson KP, Dietrich CH, Friedrich F, Beutel RG, Wipfler B, Peters RS, Allen JM, Petersen M, Donath A, Walden KKO et al. (2018) Phylogenomics and the evolution of hemipteroid insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815820115
Kjer KM, Simon C, Yavorskaya M & Beutel RG (2016) Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 13: 20160363
Li Z, Tiley GP, Galuska SR, Reardon CR, Kidder TI, Rundell RJ & Barker MS (2018) Multiple large-scale gene and genome duplications during the evolution of hexapods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115: 4713-4718
Lozano-Fernandez J, Giacomelli M, Fleming J, Chen A, Vinther J, Thomsen PF, Glenner H, Palero F, Legg DA, Iliffe M et al. (2019) Pancrustacean evolution illuminated by taxon-rich genomic-scale data sets with an expanded remipede sampling. Genome Biology and Evolution, 11: 2055-2070
Meusemann K, von Reumont B, Simon S, Roeding F, Strauss S, Kück P, Ebersberger I, Walzl M, Pass G, Breuers S et al. (2010) A phylogenomic approach to resolve the Arthropod Tree of Life. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27: 2451-2464
Misof B, Liu S, Meusemann K, Peters RS, Donath A, Mayer C, Frandsen PB, Ware J, Flouri T, Beutel RG, Niehuis O et al. (2014) Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346: 763-767
Noah KE, Hao J, Li L, Sun X, Foley B, Yang Q & Xia X (2020) Major revisions in Arthropod phylogeny through improved supermatrix, with support for two possible waves of land invasion by Chelicerates. Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 16: 12-12
Simon S, Narechania A, DeSalle R & Hadrys H (2012) Insect Phylogenomics: Exploring the source of incongruence using new transcriptomic data. Genome Biology and Evolution, 4: 1295-1309
Simon S, Blanke A & Meusemann K (2018) Reanalyzing the Palaeoptera problem - The origin of insect flight remains obscure. Arthropod Structure & Development, 47: 328-338
Song N, Li X, Yin X, Li X, Yin J & Pan P (2019) The mitochondrial genomes of palaeopteran insects and insights into the early insect relationships. Scientific Reports, 9: 17765
Thomas JA, Trueman JWH, Rambaut A & Welch JJ (2013) Relaxed phylogenetics and the Palaeoptera problem: Resolving deep ancestral splits in the insect phylogeny. Systematic Biology, 62: 285-297
Tihelka E, Cai C, Giacomelli M, Lozano-Fernandez J, Rota-Stabelli O, Huang D, Engel MS, Donoghue PCJ & Pisani D (2021) The evolution of insect biodiversity. Current Biology, 31: R1299-R1311
Trautwein MD, Wiegmann BM, Beutel R, Kjer KM & Yeates DK (2012) Advances in insect phylogeny at the dawn of the postgenomic era. Annual Reviews of Entomology, 57: 449-468
Vasilikopoulos A, Misof B, Meusemann K, Lieberz D, Flouri T, Beutel RG, Niehuis O, Wappler T, Rust J, Peters RS et al. (2020) An integrative phylogenomic approach to elucidate the evolutionary history and divergence times of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 20: 64
Wang Y, Engel MS, Rafael JA, Wu H, Rédei D, Xie Q, Wang G, Liu X & Bu W (2016) Fossil record of stem groups employed in evaluating the chronogram of insects (Arthropoda: Hexapoda). Scientific Reports, 6: 38939
Wang Y, Liu X, Garzón-Orduña IJ, Winterton SL, Yan Y, Aspöck U, Aspöck H & Yang D (2017) Mitochondrial phylogenomics illuminates the evolutionary history of Neuropterida. Cladistics, 33: 617-636
Wang Y, Zhou X, Wang L, Liu X, Yang D & Rokas A (2019) Gene selection and evolutionary modeling affect phylogenomic inference of Neuropterida based on transcriptome data. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20: 1072
Winterton SL, Lemmon AR, Gillung JP, Garzón IJ, Badano D, Bakkes DK, Breitkreuz LCV, Engel MS, Moriarty Lemmon E, Liu X et al. (2018) Evolution of lacewings and allied orders using anchored phylogenomics (Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Raphidioptera). Systematic Entomology, 43: 330-354
Wipfler B, Letsch H, Frandsen PB, Kapli P, Mayer C, Bartel D, Buckley TR, Donath A, Edgerly-Rooks JS, Fujita M et al. (2019) Evolutionary history of Polyneoptera and its implications for our understanding of early winged insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817794116
Yeates DK, Cameron SL & Trautwein M (2012) A view from the edge of the forest: recent progress in understanding the relationships of the insect orders. Australian Journal of Entomology, 51: 79-87
Zhang F, Ding Y, Zhu CD, Zhou X, Orr MC, Scheu S & Luan YX (2018) Phylogenomics from low-coverage whole-genome sequencing. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 507-517