structural impossibility

The following demonstrates why I could never had been able to have Amanda's guilty plea information available to me at the time of my preliminary hearing :

This is based on my own access to the court, not including appointed counsel, John Parris. I never included counsel since ineffective assistance of counsel requires to make a proof of a "different outcome". Excluding counsel is confirmed by the Nevada supreme court :

And the federal court stated the same :

Amanda's guilty plea criminal case was entered in my docket on December 3, 2012 :

My preliminary hearing occurred on January 4, 2013, but was waived :

The process to get Amanda's guilty plea record, sent on November 5, 2020 :

The minutes of the hearing held on December 14, 2020 :

The number of days to get the minutes :

Time available between getting Amanda's case number and the preliminary hearing :

So, it took 40 days to get minutes, but there were only 33 days available before the preliminary hearing. Thus, it took 40 - 33 = 7 more days to get confrontation information than what was available. Therefore, based on all these dates, it has been demonstrated it would have been absolutely impossible to provide a defense in my preliminary hearing. This is structural, which, at a minimum, requires reversal of my conviction.

These dates do not include all the research time and accessing all the legal information required to write the motion to access the sealed juvenile record from jail and all the mailing time required. All of which at least would add another 14 days to the 7 days, which would be up to 21 days beyond the preliminary hearing.

Also, because counsel is excluded, it was impossible for me to file a motion to get a continuance for the preliminary hearing date. To file a continuance, on my part, would be considered a "fugitive document" because I was represented by counsel.