alleged altered transcripts III

From the plea hearing transcript the following shows the five locations where "waiving procedural defects" is stated at the hearing :

Page 2

Page 5

Page 8

Page 10

From the plea hearing minutes :

The court recorder states, "Mr.Parris advised Deft. will waive any procedural defects" only after "CONFERENCE AT THE BENCH", where "waiving procedural defects" was already been stated 3 times earlier as shown above at pages 2 and 5. Why does the court recorder wait for the fourth or fifth mention of defects before entering in the minutes?

It is my allegation the court recorder never hears "waiving defects" throughout the hearing, because the minutes and transcript were altered soon after the hearing, and I don't ever recall hearing such "waiving any procedural defects" stated at the plea hearing.

I made this allegation in ecf 51, pages 10-11.

Go to the next alleged altered transcripts IV