sex offender registration

Of course I am a registered sex offender, the collateral consequence of my conviction, which is considered a "non-affirmative disability" or "insufficiently punitive". Now Nevada registration tier level is based on statute only, not by any mitigating psychosexual evaluation.

A search of my name at the Nevada sex offender website : (also national search)

However, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a dissenting opinion, 6-3 decision, stated, page 28-29, (opinion page no 111-112) last paragraph :

"The registration and reporting duties imposed on convicted sex offenders are comparable to the duties imposed on other convicted criminals during periods of supervised release or parole. And there can be no doubt that the “[w]idespread public access,” ante, at 99 (opinion in No. 01-729), to this personal and constantly updated information has a severe stigmatizing effect. See Brief for the Office of the Public Defender for the State of New Jersey et al. as Amici Curiae 7–21 (providing examples of threats, assaults, loss of housing, and loss of jobs experienced by sex offenders after their registration information was made widely available). In my judgment, these statutes unquestionably affect a constitutionally protected interest in liberty. Cf. Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U. S. 433 (1971). It is also clear beyond peradventure that these unique consequences of conviction of a sex offense are punitive. They share three characteristics, which in the aggregate are not present in any civil sanction. The sanctions (1) constitute a severe deprivation of the offender’s liberty, (2) are imposed on everyone who is convicted of a relevant criminal offense, and (3) are imposed only on those criminals. Unlike any of the cases that the Court has cited, a criminal conviction under these statutes provides both a sufficient and a necessary condition for the sanction."

The irony of the public's prejudice and concern for public safety caused the following; now that getting getting decent employment nearly impossible, the public has me sitting at the local library, where on one day I was surrounded by at least 30 7-8th graders instead of having gainful employment, and off the streets. This is 7/30/19 : a danger to the community surrounded by children (all girls).

This is what happens when public perception is allowed to spread unimpeded, causing a worse problem.

Oops, the Nevada legislature inadvertently deemed registration as punitive, NRS 41.900, where it stated, section 1, subsection b:

Meaning, as parole is clearly established as punitive, because it is custody, now by including registration with the same compensation, the legislature has without realizing it, has just established that sex offender registration is, infact, punitive.

For reference Regulatory.gov .

What it takes to compensate wrongful (I allege, illegal in my case) conviction, source article , of the law above implemented.

I can revisit, challenge my conviction if I am ever charged for failure to register pursuant to this Circuit Court decision . Just some information about "necessary predicate" (last paragraph, page 3} to use if there would ever be a trial for failure to register,:

"We now hold that a habeas petitioner is "in custody" for the purposes of challenging an earlier, expired rape conviction, when he is incarcerated for failing to comply with a state sex offender registration law because the earlier rape conviction "is a necessary predicate" to the failure to register charge. Brock, 31 F.3d at 890 "

And with the Corona virus shutdown, this issue came up, a waiver on registration?

p i

_________________________________________________________

The following shows the police department is making me violate the very law they have sign my initial to. The law which I have to acknowledge by my initial is :

However, this is the rule, outside the law, which I have to follow, is the April October cycle, for tier II :

That above alone allows me to register less than 180 days as is, and clearly violates "not less frequently than every 180 days", pursuant to the law above.

But the following shows that if I follow "not less frequently than every 180 days", exactly 180 days between each date below, pursuant to the law above, the 180 days "drifts outside the April October cycle :

This shows Going from months 4 to 10 drifts to months 3 to 9. The police would consider that violating the law, which is in direct contradiction to the nrs law as written. I could either write a motion on this or worse yet, have them arrest me on failure to register and get acquitted on the matter proving this to the court. All of this is just not worth it for now.