Legal theory page 2

However, from the previous page, the Court further reaches to find even a factual basis for a "lesser related" offense to pandering. From page 11 of the plea hearing :

Ms. Pieper stated, "... I mean so he knew that. ...", "knew" is not solicitation, thus, even the lesser related fails.

The statute for the lesser related is solicitation of minor for prostitution, is nrs 201.354, subsection 5 : A customer who violates subsection 1 by soliciting a child for prostitution... .

Therefore, the Court is left to rely on speculation based solely on what Amanda "woulds" say in trial. Putting a defendant in prison on speculation and misdemeanor probable cause is illegal, yet another defect waived by defense counsel (not me).

Yet another reason why Danielle Pieper went after me, the California element.

Here is an example when a defendant goes to to trial on kidnapping a 16 year old, and even represents himself!, Melvyn Sprowsen, video1, video2, video3, video4, video5. See videos below. His appeal documents: brief, opposition, reply to opposition, final order. and and everything else including transcripts . Below, further Kidnapping arguments. Also, his victim Jaysenia Torres :

Go to alford plea and related alleged transcript fraud