The following discusses the relation back arguments that were not considered by the Court :
footnote from my 9th circuit reply :
ecf 46 (detached from ecf 46) :
my supplement, ecf 47 :
The Respondent's reply, ecf 50 :
Where, "...somehow relates back...", the Respondent's fail to challenge my argument with any specifiicity.
Go sossa case law procedural defense for my additional defense argument to overcome the timeliness default :