alleged altered transcripts VII

From the negotiation hearing held on 5/29/13, ecf 25, exhibit 82 :

I allege, "not inclined to accept" was never said in court, and demonstrates clear transcript fraud. The foregoing was stated in ground 2 of my original habeas corpus petition.

From the second page of the above hearing :

Here, the transcript shows I am interrupting the Judge, with an arrogant attitude.

I allege what was actually said from the above, I specifically recall :

THE COURT: Do you have any questions?

THE DEFENDANT: No.

I allege the motive to alter the transcript was to show additional classic prejudice. Certainly, no legal reason to change the transcript.

The video of the hearing is below. Notice the volume of my answer is so low, its hardly audible. That indicates the editing. But If I claim I didn't say that, then what accounts for those fraudulent words? See video below to explain that it could be "voice cloning". It supports the credibility of my allegations of fraud. But I have demonstrated its all possible. Is the state actually that sophisticated that it could have someone go through this much effort to fraud, in 2013 technology?

Go to alleged altered transcripts VIII