Floor Hockey Unit Written Assessment
In our Floor Hockey Unit we have been looking at the Sport Ed Model. This is a process where students take a leadership role in designing plays, coaching, refereeing, and running a practice session before a game. Its idea is to create the skills needed to become a coach or parental volunteer.
Assignment:
In a one to two page paper, following the below guidelines I want you to describe Herb Brooks, player then turned coach of the 1980 Olympic Men’s Hockey team, coaching style and how it influenced his players. Key points of his coaching style should be described along with how you feel they worked to create a gold medal team from one of the biggest failing programs in men’s Olympic sports. The following questions should be addressed in your essay.
1. Do you think he was fair in his coaching?
2. Was it to much to ask?
3. What worked and what didn’t work?
4. Why did he have to incorporate this style on his young athletes?
5. Compare and contrast his coaching style to the several you may have experienced in your life from coaches or mentors?
Essay Requirements:
1. A one to two page double spaced 12 font paper
2. Three paragraph essay with an intro with a thesis statement, body, and conclusion paragraph.
3. Cite all sources
RUBRIC ON BACK
Due Date: JS PE, Sec 2/5 and Sec 3 Due Tue Dec 6th
JS Sec 1 and Sec 4 Due Thurs Dec 8th
NS/0
Compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, , restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
Compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
Compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, responses, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent
CATEGORY
Content:
FOCUS 1
Content: ORGANIZATION 1
Content: SUPPORT
Content: FOCUS 2
4
Topic/subject is clear, though it may/may not be explicitly stated.
Organizational structure establishes relationship between/among ideas/events.
Support information is related to and supportive of the topic/subject.
Maintains focus on topic/subject throughout response.
3
Topic/subject is generally clear though it may not be explicitly stated.
Organizational structure establishes relationships between ideas/events, although minor lapses may be present.
Support information has minor weaknesses in relatedness to and/or support of the topic/subject.
May exhibit minor lapses in focus on topic/subject.
2
Topic/subject may be vague.
Organizational structure establish some relationship between/among some of the ideas/events. The structure is minimally complete.
Support information has major weaknesses in relatedness to and/or support of the topic/subject.
May lose or may exhibit major lapses in focus on topic/subject.
1
Topic/subject is unclear or confusing.
Organizational structure does not establish connection between/among ideas/events. The overall stucture is incomplete or confusing.
An attempt has been made to add support information, but it was unrelated or confusing.
May fail to establish focus on topic/subject.