See the file at the bottom of the present page that you can open and download. If there is a problem, contact empedocles.acragas at gmail.com

Zafiropulo, Jean, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Paris : Les Belles lettres 1953.

– Εμπεδοκλέους Καθαρμοί, texte établi et annoté par J. Z., traduction, le poème des purifications, Paris : A. Tallon 1954 (a de luxe reprint of the part of the study 1953).

– Εμπεδοκλέους Περι φύσεως. Seguono, di J. Z. una traduzione francese e uno scritto dal titolo “Les théories d’Empédocle et leur contexte”, Alpignano : Tallone 1962.

Zeller, Eduard, Über die griechischen Vorgänger Darwin’s, in: Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1878, p. 111-24 (Emp.: p. 115-9). 

– Die Philosophie der Griechen, eine Untersuchung über Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung, Theil 1, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, Tübingen: L.F. Fues 1844, p. 166-194. Second edition: Tübingen: L.F. Fues 1856 with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Theil 1, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, p.; 500-575.   Third edition: Leipzig: Fues's Verlag (R. Reisland) 1869, with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Theil 1, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, p.; 604-683.    Fourth edition: Leipzig: Fues's Verlag (R. Reisland) 1876, with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, p. 678-760.   Fifth edition: Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1892, with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Theil 1, Hälfte 2, p. 750-837.   Sixth edition: Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1920 (ed. by W. Nestle), with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, p. 939-1038. (The third edition from 1869 is available on Gallica: http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/CadresFenetre?O=NUMM-77973&Mpagination&Y=Image).

– Über die älteste Zeugnisse zur Geschichte des Pythagoras, in: Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Berlin, 1889, p. 985-96 (p. 990: B 155, A 1, par. 55).

Zhmud, Leonid, Wissenschaft, Philosophie und Religion im frühen Pythagoreimus, Berlin 1997, p. 33-4 (B 129), 127-8 (B 141), 247-8 (A 70, A 71, A 73).

– Revising Doxography: Hermann Diels and his Critics, in: Philologus 145, 2/2001, p. 219-43.

– Pythagoras. Leben, Lehre, Nachwirkung. By Christoph Riedweg, in: Ancient Philosophy 23/2, 2003, p. 416-420 (p. 417: Emp. was neither a Pythagorean nor an Orphic, though he was influenced by Orphism and Pythagoreanism; however, a common source of his poems cannot be determined).

Ziegler, Konrat, Menschen- und Weltwerden. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Mikrokosmosidee, in: Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum 31, 1913, p. 529-573 (p. 534, n. 3: A 721, 535-7: 4 phases of zoogony, 536, n. 3: B 62.1-4, 539 a 553: B 61, 544 a 563: B 87; the basic purpose of the article is to prove heavy influence of Orphic material, which was allegedly mediated through Empedocles, on Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s Symposion).

Zielinski, Siegfried, Attraction and repulsion: Empedocles, pp. 39-56, in: Deep time of the media : toward an archaeology of hearing and seeing by technical means, Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 2006.

Živanovic, Miodrag, Fragmenti misticnog  : Empedokle ; izbor, prevod i predgovor Miodrag Zivanovic, Banja Luka : Litera, 2003.

Zoumpos, A[nastasius?] N., Η εννοια της συμμετρίας εν τη διδασκαλία του Εμπεδοκλέους, Εν Αθήναις 1960 (= Φιλοσοφικά σημειώματα III, Αθηναι 1960).

– Εις Εμπεδοκλέα, in: Athena 66, 1962, p. 298-300 (B 23, B 27-28, B 96, B 98).

– Ποικίλα φιλολογικά και φιλοσοφικά, in: Platon 15, 1963, p. 142-3 (B 147).

Zuntz, Günther, De Empedoclis librorum numero coniectura, in: Mnemosyne 18, 1965, p. 365.

– Empedokles fr. 137, in: Wiener Studien 79, 1966, p. 38-44. (B 137.)

– Persephone: three essays on religion and thought in Magna Graecia, Oxford: Clarendon 1971, p. 181-276 (edition, translation and commentary of Katharmoi).

– Griechische philosophische Hymnen. Aus dem Nachlaß. Hrsg. v. Hubert Cancik und Lutz Käppel, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005, (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum - Studies and texts in antiquity and Christianity, 35), pp. 1-25 (Ein philosophischer Hymnos des Empedokles?). (B 134.)

(2) Bibliography of works of art and art-historical articles on Empedocles

Zaborowski, Robert, "L'affectivité dans les fragments des Présocratiques : THYMOS et PHREN", Parnassos 47, 2005, pp. 5–24.

– Sur le sentiment chez les Présocratiques. Contribution psychologique à la philosophie des sentiments, Varsovie : Stakroos, 2008. (pp. 78-91 : θυμός, φρήν, νόος ;  pp. 165-167 : λόγος in B 4.3).

Thivel, Antoine, Eryximaque et le principe des contraires, in: Cuadernos de Filología Clásica, Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos, 2004, 14, p. 35-44. http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/revistas/fll/11319070/articulos/CFCG0404110035A.PDF. Influence of Empedocles on Eryximaque. Like to like and opposites (Heraclitus).

Thomas, Hellmuth Paul Fritz, Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Empedokles (diss.), Leipzig 1924.

Thomas, Hans Werner, EPEKEINA: Untersuchungen über das Überlieferungsgut in den Jenseitsmythen Platons (diss.), München 1938.

Tiedemann, Dieterich, Geist der spekulativen Philosophie von Thales bis Sokrates, Marburg 1791, p. 242-62.

Tigner, Steven S., Empedocles’ Twirled Ladle and the Vortex-Supported Earth, in: Isis 65, 1974, p. 433-47. (A 671, B 26, B 35, B 115.)

– Some LSJ Addenda and Corrigenda, in: Glotta, 52, 3/4, 1974, p. 192-206. (A 51, A 56, B 6.1, B 8.3, B 17.10,17,21,26,30, B 20.6, B 21.4,6, B 26.9, B 27.4, B 28.2, B 35.12,15, B 48, B 62.4.)

Timotin, Andrei, La démonologie platonicienne, Histoire de la notion de daimôn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens, Leiden / Boston : Brill 2012. (Philosophia Antiqua 128). (B 59, B 112, B 115, B 122, B 126, B 146.)

Timpanaro Cardini, Maria, Respirazione e clessidra, in: La Parola del Passato 12, 1957, p. 250-70 (B 100).

– La clessidra di Empedocle e l’esperienza di Torricelli, in: Convegno di studi Torricelliani in occasione del 350. anniversario della nascita di evangelista Torricelli 1958, Faenza 1959, p. 151-6. (B 100.).

– La zoogonia di Empedocle e la critica aristotlelica, in: Physis 2, 1960, p. 5-13. (B 60.).

– Pseudo-Aristotle De lineis inscecabilibus, Varese 1970.

– Problemi attuali di scienza e di cultura, in: Rendiconti della classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche dell’Accademia dei Lincei 154, 1973, p. 65-70.

Tiraqueau, André (Tiraquellus Andrea), Commentarii de nobilitate et jure primigeniorum, apud Iacobum Kerver, Parisiis 1549, p. 104-5, 107 and 123, Caput 31, Num. 34, 56 and 212 (a short biography of Emp. life.; meaningless).

Tischer, Hermann, Quaestionum Empedoclearum specimen scripsit Dr. H. T., in: Programm, durch welches zu den am Schlusse des Schuljahrs Ostern 1842 bis Ostern 1843 den 6. und 7. April 1843 bei dem Gymnasium zu Luckau Statt findenden Schulfeyerlichkeiten im Namen seiner Amtsgenossen ehrerbietigst einladet G. Kreyenberg, Gymnasii Director, Luckau : J. Entleutner 1843, p. 1-28 (p. 3-17: Empedoclis carmina ad quam usque aetatem servata vel potius lectitata esse integra videantur; p. 17-28: De locis quibusdam Empedoclis primariis).

Tkatsch, Jaroslaus, Die arabische Übersetzung der Poetik des Aristoteles, und die Grundlage der Kritik des griechischen Texten [von A. Gudeman - Th. Seif aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben], Wien - Leipzig 1932, II.128a - 131a (B 35.15).

Todoua, Maïa, Empédocle: empêche-vents ou dompteur des mauvais génies? Réflexions autour du fr. 111 Diels-Kranz, in: Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 1, 2005, p. 49-81.

–  La conception de la Genèse dans la philosophie présocratique : Parménide et Empédocle, Diss. dec. 2005, Université Paris IV - Sorbonne, Dir. Jacques Jouanna. B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 15, B 17, B 35, B 57, B 58, B 59, B 60, B 61, B 62, B 115.

Tonelli, Angelo, Empedocle di Agrigento. Frammenti e testimonianze, Origini, Purificazioni, con i frammenti del Papiro di Strasburgo, Milano : Bompiani 2002.

– Cosmogony is Psychogony is Ethics: Some Thoughts about Empedocles’ Fragments 17; 110; 115; 134 DK, and P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665 - 1666D, VV. 1-9, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 309-330.

Tonnelat, Ernest, L’oeuvre poétique et la pensée religieuse de Hölderlin, Paris : Didier 1950, p. 309-62.

Tortorelli, Marisa: see Ghidini - Tortorelli, Marisa,

Tourney, Garfield, Empedocles and Freud, Heraclitus and Jung, in: Bulletin of the History of Medicine 30, 1956, p. 109-23 (this study is quite useless for Empedoclean studies).

Trabattoni, Franco, Empedocle - I frammenti: sulla natura, purificazioni, con testo greco a fronte, trad. di F. T., Marcos y Marcos, Milano 1987.

Traglia, Antonio, Riflessi omerici nei frammenti di Empedocle, Arte della Stampa, Pescara : Arte della Stampa di L. Stracca 1931 (p. 85-96: B 6).

– Studi sulla lingua di Empedocle, Mousikai dialektoi, serie V-3, Bari : Adriatica Editrice 1952.

– Breve rassegna di studi Empedoclei, in: Atene e Roma 1 (ser. 4.2), 1952, p. 151-4.

– Reminiscenze empedoclee nei ‘Fenomeni’ di Arato, in: Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di A. Rostagni, Torino : Bottega d’Erasmo 1963, p. 382-93.

– Empedoclea, in: Cultura e scuola 17/65, 1978, p. 47-54.

Trépanier, Simon, The Structure of Empedocles' Fragment 17, in: Essays in Philosophy 1/1, 2000, p. 2-16 (http://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=eip - B 17).

– Empedocles: An Interpretation, Thesis in Philosophy and Classics, University of Toronto, 2001.

– “We” and Empedocles Cosmic Lottery: P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1165 - 1666, in: Mnemosyne 56, 4/2003, p. 385-419.

– Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World, in: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25, 2003, p. 1-57. (a (i), a (ii), d, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 35, B 98, B 109, B 124)

– Empedocles: An Interpretation, New York - London: Routledge 2004 (Studies in classics, 2).

– The didactic plot of Lucretius' De rerum natura and its Empedoclean model, p. 243-282, in: Richard Sorabji, Robert W. Sharples (ed.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-200 AD. Vol. I, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 94,  London:  Institute of Classical Studies, University of London, 2007. Influence of Lucretius on “the New Empedocles” (i. e. Pap. Strasb.)

– Review of L. Rossetti – C. Santaniello, Sotto contesa, Rossetti (L.), Santaniello (C.), Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, in: The Classical Review 58.1, 2008, p. 6-7.

– Review of Rosenfeld-Löffler, Annette, La poétique d'Empédocle: cosmologie et métaphore, Bern / Oxford: P. Lang, 2006, in: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 2009, 129, p. 228-229.

– Early Greek Theology: God as Nature and Natural Gods, p. 273-317, in: Jan N. Bremmer, Andrew Erskine (ed), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh Leventis Studies, 2010.

– From wandering limbs to limbless gods:  δαίμων as substance in Empedocles, in Apeiron. Volume 47, Issue 2, 2014, p. 172–210. (B 29, B 59, B 115, B 134, c MP.) 

Trindade Santos, José Gabriel, Vita e morte, amore e contesa in Empedocle, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, pp. 108-121.

Tsantsanoglou Kyriakos et al., The Derveni Papyrus, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki 2006, (Studi e testi per il corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, 13). (B 134.)

Tsimbidaros, Ilias, Cosmogonie et poésie divinatoire chez Empédocle : À propos du papyrus de Strasbourg, in: Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, XXVIII - 2, 2010, p. 33-47.

– Le double dit. L'ambiguïté de la naissance et de la mort chez Empédocle (Strasb. d, Diels 17, 3-4 ; 26, 5-7, 118-121), in: Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, XXIX (1), 2011, p. 3-28. (B 6, B 9, B 17, B 20, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 115, B 118, B 120, B 121, B 125). 

Tumino, G., Mito e scienza nei poemi di Empedocles, in: Die Kraft der Vergangenheit. Mythos und Realität der klassischen Kultur, Akten der deutsch-italienischen Tagung des Centrum Latinatatis Europae, Berlin, 29-30 November 2003, hrsg. von G. Ugolini, Hildesheim 2005, p. 147-158.

Tucker, G. M., Empedocles in Exile, in: The Classical Review 45, 1931, p. 49-51. (B 112.3.)

Tzavaras [Τζαβάρας], Giannes, Η ποίηση του Εμπεδοκλή: κείμενο, μετάφραση, σχόλια, Αθήνα - Γιάννενα: Δωδώνη, 1988.

– Πυθαγόρειες επιδράσεις στη φιλοσοφία του Εμπεδοκλή, in: Πυθαγόρεια φιλοσοφία, ed. by K. Boudouris, Athenai - Samos : Εκδόσεις του Διεθνούς Κέντρου Ελληνικής Φιλοσοφίας,1992, pp. 189-94.

UUU

Ueberweg, Friedrich - Praechter, Karl, Die Philosophie des Altertums, Berlin : E. S. Mittler und Sohn 1926, p. 91-7.

Unger, Georg Friedrich, Die Zeitverhältnisse des Anaxagoras und Empedokles, in: Philologus Supplementband 4, 1884, p. 511-50 (I. Die Zeit des Anaxagoras und Empedokles; II. Empedokles als Politiker; III. Anaxagoras).

VVV

Valdevit, Rosamaria, Note sulla teologia dello scritto pseudo-aristotelico De mundo, in: Studi italiani di filologia classica 4, 1986, p. 29-41 (the appendix of the study involves an analysis of Ps.-Aristotle handling with Emp. in 5. book De mundo).

Vamvacas, Constantine J., Empedocles of Acragas (ca. 494–434 B.C.), p. 167-196, In: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. The Founders of Western Thought – The Presocratics: A diachronic parallelism between Presocratic Thought and Philosophy and the Natural Sciences, Springer, 2009. (Volume 257.)

van den Es, A. H. G. P., Empedocles, in: De Nederlandsche Spectator 2, 1880, p. 14-5, Nr. 3, p. 20-3, Nr. 4, p. 27-9, Nr. 5, p. 35-7, Nr. 9, p. 67-73, nr. 12, p. 96-9.

van der Ben, Nicolaus, The Proem of Empedocles’ Peri physios: towards a new edition of all the fragments, Amsterdam : B. R. Grüner, 1975.

– Empedocles’ Fragments 8, 9, 10 DK, in: Phronesis 23, 1978, p. 197-215.

– Cycle and Fragment 17, 3-5 DK, in: Hermes 112, 1984, p. 281-96.

–  The Meaning of ΓΝΩΜΑ, in: Glotta, 73, 1995-1996, p. 35-55. (B 110.10.)

– Empedocles’ Fragment 20 DK: Some Suggestions, in: Mnemosyne 4/49, 1996, p. 281-96.

– The Strasbourg Papyrus of Empedocles: Some preliminary Remarks, in: Mnemosyne 52, 1999, p. 525-44.

van der Eijk, Philip, The woman not breathing, in: Heraclides of Pontus, vol. XV, ed. W W. Fortenbaugh – E. Pender, New Brunswick – London: Transaction Publishers 2009, p. 237-250. (B 111.)

Vandercoilden, Gilbert, Empédocle et sa conception de la nature (unpublished thèse de licence), Université de Louvain 1945.

Vanella, Giovanni, Empedocle e la poesia di Lucrezio. in: Estratto dall'Annuario 1960-1969 del Liceo Ginnasio Statale Pietro Giannone - Caserta. Caserta: Grafiche Russo 1969. (Review in: L'Antiquité classique, Tome 39, fasc. 2, 1970. p. 600-601.)

van Goens, Rijklof Michael, Porphyrius, De antro nympharum, graece cum latina L. Holstenii versione, Traiecti ad Rhenum 1765, p. 9 (B 120) and 96 (a sketch of Emp. biography).

van Groningen, Bernhard Abraham, Trois notes sur Empédocle, in: Mnemosyne 9, 1956, p. 221-4. (B 27.2, B 122-3, B 137.)

– Le fragment 111 d’Empédocle, in: Classica et Mediaevalia 17, 1956, p. 47-61. (B 111.)

– La composition littéraire archaïque grecque: procédés et réalisations, Amsterdam 1958, p. 201-222. (Chap. VII: B 24, B 35, etc.).

– Empédocle, poète, in: Mnemosyne 24, 1971, p. 169-88.

van Herwerden, H.,  Quaestiunculae epicae et elegiacae, Utrecht: Kemink 1876, p. 81-84. (New reading of some verses edited by Karsten; B 115, B 4, B17.27-28 + B 26.1-2, B 23.9-10, B 35, B 105, B. 17.28, B 27.)

van Stégeren, D. J., Empedocles en Darwin, in: De Nederlandsche Spectator 50, 1879, p. 398-400.

Vattuone, Riccardo, Timeo F 119 b. Empedocle e Timoleonte, in: Rivista storica dell’antichità 15, 1985, p. 224-36.

Vaute, Paul, Un Empédocle inédit révélé par un papyrus de Haute-Egypte, in: La Libre Belgique, 4 mars 1999, p. 24.

Veazie, Walter Broad, Empedocles’s Psychological Doctrine in its Original and its Traditional Setting, Dissertation of Columbia University 1917, 27 p. (printed in Archives of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method 14, New York 1922).

Vegetti, Mario, Empedocle “medico e sofista”(Antica medicina 20), in: Elenchos 19/2, 1998, p. 345-59 (A 71). (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997, p. 217-411.)

–  Empedocle „Medico e Sofista“ (Antica Medicina 20), in: Klaus-Dietrich Fischer – Diethard Nickel – Paul Potter (eds.), Text and Tradition. Studies in Ancient Medicine and its Transmission presented to Jutta Kollesch, Leiden – Boston - Köln: Brill, 1998, s. 289-299 (A 71, Iatrikos logos, B 112, B 111).

–  Ιστορία της αρχαίας φιλοσοφίας, μτφρ. Γ.Χ. Δημητρακόπουλος, Αθήνα :  Τραυλός, 2000, Pp. 100-107 + 112-114 (Εμπεδοκλής).

–  Athanatizein. Strategie di immortalità nel pensiero greco, in: Dialoghi con gli antichi, by Vegetti, Mario, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin 2007, pp. 165-178.

Veikos, Th[eophilos?], Εμπεδοκλης (B 35, 3-4). Η κοσμική δίνη,  in: Hellenica 24, 1971, p. 312-20.

– Χώρος και χρόνος στην κοσμολογία του Εμπεδοκλή, in: Hellenica 22, 1969, p. 326-40.

Veneciano, Gustavo, El fr. 139 DK de Empédocles y el ensemble ‘d’ del papiro de Estrasburgo. A propósito de una nueva edición, in: Argos, vol. 35 nº2, 2012, p. 92-103.                                                                                                     http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1853-63792012000200006&script=sci_arttext  . (B 139, d.)

Verdenius, Willem Jacob, Empedocles’ Doctrine of Sight, in: Studia varia Carolo Guilielmo Vollgraff a discipulis oblata, Amsterdam, North/Holland Pub. Co. 1948, p. 155-64 (B 84). 

– Notes on the Presocratics VIII: The Meaning of πίστις in Empedocles; IX: Empedocles Frag. 26, 2, in: Mnemosyne 4, 1948, p. 10-14.

– Parmenides. Some Comments on his Poem, Groningen - Batavia 1942.

Verdenius, W. J. – Waszink, Jan Henrik, Aristotle On coming-to-be and passing-away, some comments, Brill, Leiden 1946, p. 64-7 (B 8, B 35.15)

Vergnioux, Alain, La "panhumanité" d'Empédocle, in: Le Télémaque, 2001/1 n° 19, p. 29-36.

Vernant, Jean-Pierre, Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs: études de psychologie historique, I, Paris: François Maspero 1965 (reimpr. 1971), p. 93-95, 102-104. 113-114, 117-121. (B 4, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 129, B 132, B 146, B 147.)

Viano, Cristina, Aristote, De coel. I 10: Empédocle, l’alternance et le mythe du ‘Politique’, in: Revue des études grecques 107, 1994/2, p. 400-413.

Vicaire, Paul, Review of  J. Bollack Empédocle II et III - 1972, in: Revue de Philologie, de Littérature et d'histoire anciennes 46, 1972, p. 110-115.

Vertue, H. S. H., Venus and Lucretius, in: Greece and Rome 3/2, 1956, p. 140-52. 

Vidal Triñanes, Ángela, Empédocles, Deus suposto: O filósofo, o poeta, o taumaturgo e o home, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Facultade de filoloxía, grao en filoloxía clásica, 2016.  https://baleiro.academia.edu/%C3%81ngelaVidalTri%C3%B1anes

Vítek, Tomáš, Empedoklés : I. / Studie, Praha : Herrmann & synové, 2001. (To order that book, see: https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/tomas-vitek)

– Nové Empedokleovy verše, in: Reflexe 27, 2004, p. 75-94.

– Empedoklés : II. / Zlomky, Praha : Herrmann & synové, 2006. (576 pages: édition of all testimonies, contexts of the verses, fragments, bibliography, Index. To order that book, see: https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/tomas-vitek).

– Empedoklés : III. / Komentář, Praha : Herrmann & synové, 2006. (680 pages: commentary of all fragments. To order that book, see: https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/tomas-vitek). 

 – Le Sphairos d’Empédocle et son substrat mythologique, in: Elenchos, XXXI (fasc. 1), 2010, p. 23-49.

Vivarelli, Vivetta, Empedokles und Zarathustra: Verschwendeter Reichtum und Wollust am Untergang, in: Nietzsche Studien 18, 1989, p. 509-36.

Vlastos, Gregory, Equality and Justice in Early Greek Philosophy, in: Classical Philology 42, 1947, p. 156-78 (Emp.: p. 158-61).

– Religion and Medicine in the Cult of Asclepius: A Review Article, in: The Review of Religion 13.1, 1948 (November), p. 268-290 (p. 272-3: B 111.9 plus A 1, par. 60-2)

– Theology and Philosophy in Early Greek Thought, in: The Philosophical Quarterly 7, 1952, s. 97-123 (Emp.: p. 119-21).

Voilquin, Jean, Les Penseurs grecs avant Socrate: de Thalès de Milet à Prodicos, traduction, introduction, notices et notes par Jean Voilquin, Paris: Garnier Frères 1941 (Les Classiques Garnier). Empedocles: Chap VI, p. 97-122, 229-231). Reprint Les Penseurs grecs avant Socrate: de Thalès de Milet à Prodicos, traduction, introduction et notes par Jean Voilquin, Paris: Garnier-Flammarion 1964, [GF 31]; Empedocles: Chap VI, p. 115-141, p. 236-238.

Vollgraff, W. Elementum, in: Mnemosyne 2, 1949, p. 89-115. (B 6.)

von Arnim, H., Die Weltperioden bei Empedokles, in: Festschrift Theodor Gomperz, dargebracht zum siebzigsten Geburtstage am 29 März 1902 von schülern freunden Collegen, Wien: Alfred Hölder 1902, p. 16-27.

von Fritz, Kurt, ΝΟΥΖ, ΝΟΕΙΝ, and their Derivatives in Pre-socratic Philosophy. Part II. The Post-parmenidean Period, in: Classical Philology 1946, 41, 1, p. 12-34 (Emp.: p. 13-21). This study was reprinted in: The Pre-Socratics, ed. by A. P. D. Mourelatos, Princeton University Press 1993 (revised edition of a first publication in 1974), p. 23-85, (Emp.: p. 55-67). (B 2, B 3, B 4, B 5, B 17, B 105, B 106, B 109, B 133, B 134.)

von Staden, Heinrich, The discovery of the body: Human dissection and its cultural contexts in Ancient Greece, in: Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 65, 1992, p. 223-241.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2589595/pdf/yjbm00051-0069.pdf

von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich, Lesefrüchte, in: Hermes 37, 1902, p. 326-7 (B 27a).

– Lesefrüchte, in: Hermes 40, 1905, p. 165-70.

– Die Katharmoi des Empedokles, in: Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 27, 1929, p. 626-61 (published also separately in: Kleinen Schriften, Berlin 1935, p. 473-521).

– Lesefrüchte, in: Hermes 65, 1930, s. 245-50 (B 35.3-4, B 9, B 17, B 21 etc.).

– Die Gedichte des Empedokles, in: Forschungen und Fortschritte 6, 1930, p. 50-1.

– Der Glaube der Hellenen I-II, Berlin 1931-2.

Vossius, Gerardus Ioannes, De historicis Graecis libri I, Lugduni Batavorum, ex officina Ioannis Maire, 16512, p. 437-8 (a sketch of Emp. biography; B 33).

– s. v. Empedocles, in: The Great Historical Geographical and Poetical Dictionnary, sixth edition corrected and enlarged by J. Leclerc, printed for Henry Rhodes, London 1690, Volume I, without pagination (cca 20 unvaluable lines on Emp. life and work).

WWW

Wackernagel, Jacob, Orthographica und Verwandtes, in: Philologus 86, 1931, p. 133-40: 1. ἱdrώj und Zubehör (B 21.4, B 62.5, B 73.2).

Wachsmuth, Günther, Empedokles, der faustische Mensch vor Christus, in: Das Goethaneum, Internationale Wochenschrift für Anthroposophie und Dreigliederung, Jahrgang 2, No. 18, 1923, p. 140-2 (9. 12.) and Jahrgang 3, No. 19, 1923 (16. 12.), p. 147-9 (pars I is reprinted also in: Anthroposophie 5/32, 1924 (7. 2. 1924), p. 1-2, and 5/33, 1924 (14. 2.), p. 1-2).

Wacziarg Engel, Aude Priya, Hésiode, Théogonie:  Un chant du cosmos, Paris: Fayard 2014 (Ouvertures, bilingues). (P. 18 : B 6, a short support to Zeus = aither, Hera = earth, Aïdôneus = fire.)

Wada, Toshihiro, The Period of Present World in Empedocles, in: Methodos [A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, published at Kyoto University] 29, 1997, p. ???. 

http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ancphil/methodos/methodos_OLD/methodos29.html#wada

Wagner, G., Hölderlin und die Vorsokratiker, diss. Würzburg : Triltsch 1937 (= Bamberg 1983).

Warren, James, Presocratics, Stocksfield: Acumen 2007, p. 135-152, 201-203. (B 6, B 12, B 17, B 23, B 112, B 115, B 137.)

Waterfield, Robin, The First Philosophers: the Presocratics and Sophists, Oxford World’s Classics, Oxford : Oxford University Press 2000, p. 133-63 (24 testimonies, 50 fragments).

Waters, Kenneth H., The Rise and Decline of Some Greek Colonies in Sicily, in: Ancient Society 5, 1974, p. 1-19 (A 1; on Acragas and its situation in fifth century BC).

Wehrli, Fritz, Herakleides Pontikos: Texte und Kommentar (Die Schule des Aristoteles VII), Basel - Stuttgart, 19692 (A 1).

Weiher, A., Heraklit und Empedokles, Progr. Kaiserslauten 1916.

Weische, Alfons, Quam varie et diverse Empedocles et Lucretius praepositionibus usi sint, parvula de linguis comparandis disputatio, in: Loquela vivida. Donum natalicium Nicolao Sallmann sexagesimum quintum annum agenti a fautoribus linguae Latinae vivae oblatum, ed. Jürgen Blänsdorf, Würzburg 1999, p. 11-20.

Wellmann, Eduard, Die deutsche Litteratur über die Vorsokratiker 1894 bis 1900 [Review of Th. Gomperz, Griechischer Denker], in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 15/1, 1902, p. 113-132 (Empedocles: p. 113-4).

–  s. v. Empedokles (3), in: Pauly-Wissowa Real Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Band 5/10, Stuttgart 1905, p. 2507-12.

Wellmann, Max, Die Fragmente der sikelischen Ärzte Akron, Philistion und des Diokles von Karystos, Berlin 1901.

Wendland, Paul, Das Gewand der Eitelkeit, in: Hermes 51, 1916, p. 481-5 (B 126).

Wenskus, Otta, Empedokles Erklärung der Entstehung der Sonnenfinsternisse das Fragment DK 31 B 42, in: Hermes 108.2, 1980, p. 243-8. (B 42.)

Wersinger, Anne Gabrièle, Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle, in: Études philosophiques 4, Oct - Dec 2001, p. 558-60.

– Empédocle et Homère. L’Un et le Multiple dans le répétition formulaire, in: Diotima 31, 2003, p. 11-20.

– La “fête criminelle” (Empédocle, Perséphone et les Charites), in: La Fête : la rencontre du sacré et du profane, eds. M. Mazoyer – J. Pérez Rey – F. Malbran-Labat – R. Lebrun, Paris: L’Harmattan, 2004, p. 109-131.

– La Sphère et l'intervalle : le schème de l'Harmonie dans la pensée des anciens Grecs d'Homère à Platon, Grenoble : Jerôme Millon 2008 (coll. Horos). (Chap. 2 : Empédocle, l'Harmonie infinie comme Un, pp. 63-97 ; B 17, B 24, B 26, B 27, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 61, B 71, B 96, B 99, B 100, B 109, B 110, B 123.)

– Présentation de "Empédocle, les dieux, le sacrifice et la grâce",  in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2012/3, p. 291-299. http://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2012-3-page-291.htm

– Empédocle, la violence sacrificielle et la grâce, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2012/3, p. 379-402. http://www.cairn.info/resume.php?ID_ARTICLE=RMM_123_0379

– Empédocle et la poétique de l'analogie dans le fragment 84, in: ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ, 42, 2012, p. 41-65. (B 84.)

West, Martin Litchfield, Empedocles on Papyrus, in: The Classical Review 12, 1962, p. 120. (B 115.6.)

– ζωρός in Empedocles, in: The Classical Review 16, 1966, p. 135-6. (B 35.15.)

– Notes on Newly-Discovered Fragments of Greek Authors, in: Maia 20, 1968, p. 195-205. (Emp.: p. 199-200: B 153b, B 75).

– Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient, Oxford : At the Clarendon Press 1971, p. 233-5 et passim (20022).

– The Orphic Poems, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1983. (P. 108: Sphairos) 

– Towards Monotheism, in: Pagan Monotheism in late Antiquity, ed. A. Athanasssiadi - M. Frede, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999, p. 21- 40. (Empedocles: p. 35-36, B 6, B 21.9, B 27, B 31, B 115, B 134.)

Wieck, Felix, Sphaeram Empedoclis quae dicitur, recensuit et dissertationem adiecit F. W. (diss.), Lipsiae, Hirschfeld 1897 (xxxviii, 37 p.; B 161).

Wilcox, J., “Whole-Natured Forms” in Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle, in: Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy VI: Before Plato, ed. A. Preus, Albany : State University of New York Press 2001, p. 109-22.

Wildberg, Christian, Commentary on Curd: A New Empedocles, in: Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 17, 2001, p. 50-59.

Wilford, P. A., Embryological Analogies in Empedocles’ Cosmogony, in: Phronesis 13, 1968, p. 108-18. (A 51, B 35, B 100.)

Wilkens, Karsten, Wie hat Empedokles die Vorgänge in der Klepsydra erklärt?, in: Hermes 95.2, 1967, p. 129-140. (B 100.)

Wilkins, Ernest H., Empedocles in Filelfo’s terza rima, in: Speculum 38, p. 318-23. (B 161.)

Willi, Andreas, The languages of Aristophanes : Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2003, (Oxford Classical Monographs), pp. 101-113.

– Sikelismos : Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im griechischen Sizilien (8.-5. Jh. v. Chr.), Basel : Schwabe, 2008. (Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana 29.). (Pp. 193-279, 303-5 ; several fragments ; p. 226-228: B 6 [backing Kingsley's view].)

Wilson, Robert D., Empedocles, dialogus graecus proemio Gaisfordiano dignatus A. D. M., T. and G. Shrimpton, Oxford 1857 (16 p.) 

Winnefeld, Hermann, Die Philosophie des Empedokles. Ein Versuch von Dr. H. W., in: Beilage zum Programm des Grossherzoglichen Gymnasiums in Donaueschingen von Schuljahr 1861/1862, Rastatt : W. Mayer 1862 (59 p.).

Wismann, Heinz, Le métier de philologue II, in: Critique, 279-280, 1970, p. 774-781. (Review of  J. Bollack and D. O'Brien.)

Wiśniewski, Bohdan, Quaestiones Empedocleae, in: La Parola di Passato 29, 1974, p. 158-71. (A 30, A 31, A 32, B 134.4-5, B 3.9-13, B 2 etc.; a curious article postulates quite improbable theses on 4 roots, Love - Strife, sphairos, and phren hiere.)

Wöhrle, Georg, Carmini divini pectoris oder prodesse und delectare bei Lucrez und Empedokles, in: Wiener Studien 104, 1991, p. 119-29 (A 21).

– Bemerkungen zur lehrhaften Dichtung zwischen Empedokles und Arat, in: Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, hrsg. von W. Kullmann - J. Althoff - M. Asper, Tübingen : Narr 1998, p. 279-86.

Wolf, Marina, [ВОЛЬФ M.H.], ≪ДВОЯКОЕ СКАЖУ≫: АРГУМЕНТАЦИЯ ЭМПЕДОКЛА ВПОЛЬЗУ ПЛЮРАЛИЗМА (В 17 DK), in: ΣΧΟΛΗ Vol. 10. 1, 2016, p. 146-163. (B 17.)

Wolfsdorf, David, Empedocles and his Ancient Readers on Desire and Pleasure, in: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 36, 2009, p. 1-71.

Wolf-Hartmut, Friedrich, Ennius-Erklärungen, in: Philologus 97, 1948, p. 277-301 (Emp.: p. 291-3).

Worthen, Thomas, Pneumatic Action in the Klepsydra and Empedocles’ Account of Breathing, in: Isis 61, 1970, p. 520-30 (B 100).

Woolerton, Emma,  The roots of Lucretius' tree-men, De rerum natura 2.702–3, in:. The Classical Quarterly (New Series), 2010, vol. 60, 01, p. 255-257. (A 70, B 21, B 61, B 82, B 143.)

Wright, Jonathan, An Italian Book on Empedocles, in: The Scientific Monthly 12, 1921, p. 339-48. (partly a review of E. Bignone, 1916.)

Wright, John Henry, The origin of Plato's cave, in: Harvard studies in classical philology, vol. 17, 1906, pp. 131-142. (B 120).

Wright, Maureen Rosemary, Empedocles: The Extant Fragments, New Haven-London: Yale University Press 1981 (Reprint: London: Bristol Classical Press 19862; reprint with new bibliography: London: Bristol Classical Press 19953 and Hackett Publishing Co., reprint 20014).

– The Presocratics, London: Duckworth (Bristol: Bristol Classical Press), 1985, p. 27-33, 107-21.

– Presocratic minds, in: The Person and the human mind: issues in ancient and modern philosophy, ed. by Ch. Gill, Oxford: Clarendon, 1990, pp. 207-225.

– Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient Philosophy, in: Phronesis 41/1, 1996, p. 111-2.

– Empedokles, in: Philosophie der Antike I-II, hrsg. von F. Ricken, Stuttgart : Kohlhammer 1996, I.111-128.

– Empedocles, in: The Routledge History of Philosophy, ed. by C. C. W. Taylor, London : Routledge 1997, I.175-207.

– Philosopher Poets: Parmenides and Empedocles, in: Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Catherine Atherton, Bari 1998, p. 1-22.

 – Introducing Greek Philosophy, Durham: Acumen 2009. (B 6, B 23, B 27, B 29, B 96, B 110, B 115, B 146.) 

Wybrands, Aemilius Willem, Nog over Empedokles, in: De Nederlandsche Spectator 51, 1879, p. 406.

XXX

Xylander, Guilielmus, Plutarchi chaeronensis, Moralia, Basel: 1570, p. 555 (Latin edition, B 115, De exilio.)

– Plutarchi chaeronensis, philosophorum & historicorum principis varia scripta, Basel: 1574, p. 428 (Greek edition, B 115, De exilio.)

Xylinas, Michalés, Η προσωκρατική φιλοσοφία και οι σύγχρονες φυσικές επιστήμες: ο Εμπεδοκλής σαν σύνδεσμος, Meleté 1997 (???).

Xylinas, Michalés - Tzavaras, Giannis, Ο Εμπεδοκλής Ακραγαντίνος ως επίκαιρος ιατροφιλόσοφος, in: Ελληνική φιλοσοφική επιθεώρηση: επιστημονικά περιοδικά 12, 1995, p. 111-28.

ZZZ

– Les principes du devenir cosmique chez Empédocle d'Agrigente et Anaxagore de Clazomène à partir de leur critique aristotélicienne, thesis, Université Paris I, 2008 (nov.), Dir. Annick Jaulin.

– Une tragédie cosmique : l’exil amnésique des daimones d’Empédocle, in: Rationalité tragique, S. Alexandre et O. Renaut (ed.), Zetesis - Actes des colloques de l’association [on line], n°1, 2010, p. 1-29, URL: http://www.zetesis.fr/actes/spip.php?article14, 5 septembre 2010. PDF téléchargeable :  http://www.zetesis.fr/actes/IMG/pdf/Therme.pdf  - B 115, B 117.

– Empédocle, in: Lire les présocratiques, ed. L. Brisson – A. Mace – A.L. Therme, Paris: PUF 2012, p. 167-181 (= chap. VII). (B 8, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 34, B 35, B 73, B 84, B 86, B 91, B 96.)

– Une relecture de la double zoogonie empédocléenne : que sont les oulophueis tupoi du fragment 62 ?, in: La Sagesse « présocratique ». Communication des savoirs en Grèce archaïque : des lieux et des hommes, ed. M.-L. Desclos – F. Fronterotta, Paris: Armand Colin 2013, p. 149-165. (See abstract on page home or archives.)

– Des racines empédocléennes chez Platon ? Échos critiques à Empédocle dans l’élaboration platonicienne de l’âme, in: Études platoniciennes, 11, 2014, p. 1-33, [on-line in April 2015]   http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/528

Thiele, Georg, Zu den vier Elementen des Empedokles, in: Hermes 32, 1897, p. 68-78 (B 6).

Rossetti, Livio, Empedocle scienziato, in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti - C. Santaniello, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, Studi 37), Bari: Levante editori 2004, p. 95-198 (A 34, A 68, B 84, A 67, B 100, B 134).

– Empedocle, in: Dizionario delle Scienze e delle Tecniche di Grecia e Roma, ed. Paola Radici Colace, Pisa - Roma: F. Serra 2010, p. 431-432.

Rostagni, Augusto, Il poema sacro di Empedocle, in: Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 51, 1923, p. 7-39. 

– Il verbo di Pitagora, Torino 1924. Reimpr. 2001, 2005 Victrix (Forli). (Chap. VIII: Il poema pitagorico di Empedocle e la storia dell'anima, p. 119-153. It is a reprint of l poema sacro di Empedocle 1923.)

– Autonomia e svolgimento della letteratura greca di Sicilia, in: Kokalos 3, 1957, p. 3-17 (Emp.: p. 13-4). 

Roux, Suzanne. Empedocles to Darwin, in: E. Close, M. Tsianikas and G. Frazis (eds.), Greek Research in Australia: Proceedings of the Biennial International Conference of Greek Studies, Flinders University April 2003,

 Adelaide: Flinders University Department of Languages - Modern Greek 2005, p.1-16.

Rowett (previously Osborne), Catherine, A Portable Presocratics Primer?, in: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 21(4), 2013, p. 

791-797.  (A critical and interesting review of Graham, D., The texts of Early Greek Philosophy.  Can be downloaded on page https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/d-w-graham---tegp.)

– Literary genres and judgements of taste: some remarks on Aristotle’s remarks about the poetry of Empedocles, in: Literarische Form und Argument in antiker Philosophie, ed. Michael Erler, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.

– Is Agathon’s Speech in Plato’s Symposium recycling the views of Empedocles?, in: X Symposium Platonicum - The Symposium, Pisa: 2013, p. 169-175. (B 23, B 111.)

– Love, Sex and the Gods: Why things have divine names in Empedocles’ poem, and why they come in pairs, in: Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 80-110. On-line: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1/issue-files/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1.xml

Rudberg, Gunnar, Empedokles und Evolution, in: Eranos 50, 1952, p. 23-30.

Ruiz, Nicolas, Leon, Review of Reality (2003) by Peter Kingsley, in: The Agonist, Vol. III, issue 2, 2008,  p. 26-38.

Rundin, John Scott, The Vegetarianism of Empedocles in its Historical Context, in: The Ancient World, vol. 29, n°1, 1998, p. 19-36. (Published by Ares Publishers Inc., A 1, B 17, B 137, democracy / aristocracy.)

Ruocco, Ernesto, Daimon, Sphairos, Ananke. Psicologia e teologia in Empedocle, in: Forme del sapere nei presocratici, ed. A. Capizzi - G. Casertano, Roma: Edizioni dell’ Ateneo 1987, p. 187-221. (P. 194-5: B 115, p. 195-6: B 117, p. 196-8: B 146, p. 198-9: B 112.4-6, p. 199-200: B 128, p. 201-3 et passim: daimon, p. 207-8 et passim: B 134, p. 208-10 et passim: sfairos, p. 217-20: ananke etc.)

Rupprecht, Karl, Empedocles fr. 133, in: Philologus 79/33, 1924, p. 112. (B 133.)

Rusten, Jeffrey Stuart, Ovid, Empedocles and the Minotaur, in: American Journal of Philology 103, 1982, p. 332-3 (B 61.2-3).

SSS

Saetta Cottone, Rossella, Nuvole e demoni. Empedocle e Socrate nelle Nuvole di Aristofane, in: La storia sulla scena, ed. A. Beltrametti, Roma, Carocci, 2011, p. 315-335. (Muse, Nêstis, Persephone, Zeus, B 149, B 38, B 21 2-6, B 44, B 84, B 73, B 23, B 71, B 146, A 56, A 60.)

– Aristophane et le théâtre du soleil. Le dieu d'Empédocle dans le chœur des Nuées, in: Comédie et Philosophie: Socrate et les "Présocratiques" dans les Nuées d'Aristophane, ed. A. Laks – R. Saetta Cottone, Paris: Editions Rue d'Ulm 2013, p. 61-85. (A 30, A 56, B 29, B 44, B 131, B 134, B 146.)

– Jean Bollack et Empédocle : une histoire de philotès, in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, vol. 6 nº12, 2012, p. 1-5. Released in October 2014.

http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1449/1290

Saffrey, Henri Dominique, Nouveaux oracles chaldaïques dans les scholies du Paris. gr. 1853, in: Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 43, 1969, p. 59-72. (p. 64-7: B 121.3). Reimpr. in: Saffrey, H. D., Recherches sur le néoplatonisme après Plotin, Paris:  J. Vrin 1990, (Histoire des doctrines de l'Antiquité classique, 24),  p. 81-94.

Saint-Pierre, B., La physique de la vision dans l’antiquité, in: Cahiers des études anciennes 5, 1976, p. 97-117.

Samson, A., Aristote et les théories présocratiques sur la connaissance, in: Laval théologique et philosophique 22, 1966, p. 22-44. (On Aristotle’s and Empedocles’ theory of cognition: different and common points.)

Sandywell, Barry, Presocratic reflexivity: The construction of philosophical discourse c. 600-450 BC. – Logological Investigations, Vol 3, London - New York: Routledge 1996. Chapter 8, pp. 354-363: Empedocles.

Sänger, Edouard, Empedokles, in: Wiener Blätter für die Freunde der Antike 8, 1932, p. 106-10 (general and unoriginal attempt at a total portrait of Emp. personality and teaching).

– Empedocles von Agrigent - Fragmente. In der Nachdichtung von Eduard Saenger. Mit orig. Radierungen von Bernard Schultze, Tiessen 1993.

Sangermano, B. Luigi, Empedocle, vita e frammenti dei poemi, Girgenti 1911 (this contains Scinà’s translation from 1813).

Sansone, David, Socrates’ “tragic” Definition of Color (Pl. Meno 76 D-E), in: Classical Philology 91.4, 1996, p. 339-45. (A 49, A 86, A 921, B 84, B 89, B 96, B 100.)

Santaniello, Carlo, Ricordo di Renato Laurenti con bibliografia dei suoi scritti, in: Studi filosofici 17, 1994, p. 51-68.

– Faults commited beyond this Life: Pindar and Empedocles in Plutarch’s Demonology, in: Estudios sobre Plutarco: Misticismo y religiones mistéricas en la obra de Plutarco, Actas del VII Simposio Español sobre Plutarco, Palma de Mallorca, 2-4 de noviembre de 2000, Ediciones Clásicas & Charta Antiqua, Madrid, ed. A. Pérez Jiménez  - F. Casadesús, Madrid-Málaga : Distribución editorial 2001, p. 255-67 (on status of Emp. daimon, B 115, B 15).

– Empedocle: uno o due cosmi, una o due zoogonie?, in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, a cura di L. Rossetti - C. Santaniello, ‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, Studi 37,  Bari: Levante editori, p. 23-81. (B 17.1-5, ad B 271, A 37, B 26.3-7, Pap. Strasb. a(i)8-a(ii)2 = B 21.7-12, Pap. Strasb. c2-8 = B 20.).

– Plutarco e i presocratici, in: La biblioteca di Plutarco, Atti del IX Convegno Plutarcheo, (Pavia, 13-15 giugno 2002), ed. I. Gallo, Napoli 2004, pp. 107-133.

– Working on Empedocles in Plutarch's Days (Fac. lun. 926D ff.), in: Plutarc a la seva època: Paideia i Societat, Actas del' VIII Simposi internacional de la Societat Española de Plutarquistas, Barcelona 6-8. nov. 2003, ed. M. Jufresa-F. Mestre, P. Gomez-P. Gilabert, Barcelona, 2005, pp. 445-452.

– Il demone in Empedocle, in: G. Gnoli, G. Sfameni Gasparro, ed., Potere e religione nel mondo indo-mediterraneo tra ellenismo e tarda antichità, Incontro di studio della Società Italiana di Storia delle Religioni (Roma, 28-29 ottobre 2004), Roma: Isiao 2009, (Il Nuovo Ramusio, 9), p. 329-361. (B 115, B 146, B 147, B 30, B 31, B 59, B 112.)

– Due frammenti e l'analogia in Empedocle: B115 D.-K. e il fr. 110 Bollack, in: Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 13 (2010) 17-50. http://gfa.gbv.de/dr,gfa,013,2010,a,02.pdf

– Θεός, Δαίμων, Φρὴν Ἱερή: Empedocles and the Divine, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2012/3, p. 301-313. (B 21, B 59, B 115, B 134.) 

 http://www.cairn.info/resume.php?ID_ARTICLE=RMM_123_0301

– An Akkadian myth and the daimon's fault in Empedocles fr. 115, in: Religion in the History of European Culture, ed. G. Sfameni Gasparro - A. Cosentino - M. Monaca, Palermo: Officina di Studi Medievali  2013, p. 133-145. (B 115.)

Santillana, Giorgio de S., The origins of scientific thought: from Anaximander to Proclus, 600 B.C to 300 A.D., Chicago: University Press, 1961. (p. 108-128: Love, Strife, and Necessity; several fragments are quoted).

Santori, C. - Gilardoni, Giovanni, Empedocle: Tutti i frammenti, trad. di. C. Santori, introduzione e commento di G. Gilardoni, Cortona : Calosci 1987.

Sartorius, Maximilian Alexander, Die Entwicklung der Astronomie bei den Griechen bis Anaxagoras und Empedokles, in besonderen Anschluss an Theophrast (diss.), in: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 82-3, 1883, p. 197-231 and 1-28; also published separately, Heynemann’sche Buchdruckerei, Halle 1883, 39 p. (Emp.: 83, p. 23-6: an usuless and uncomplete enumeration of disiecta membra of Empedoclean astronomy, no interpretation). 

Sassi, Maria Michela, Gli inizi della filosofia: in Grecia, Torino: Bollati Boringhieri 2009. (Empedocle e il suo dèmone : pp. 189-198, plus pp 216-218, 228-241, B 3, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 129, B 138, B 146.)

– Entre corps et lumière: réflexions antiques sur la nature de la couleur, in: L'Antiquité en couleurs. Textes réunis par Marcello Carastro, Grenoble : Jerôme Millon 2009. (Feu et eau, blanc et noir: d’Empédocle à Aristote; B 71.2-3 B 21.3.)

– Where Epistemology and Religion Meet - What do(es) the god(s) look like?, in: Rhizomata 2013 1(2), p. 283-307. (B 133, B 134.)

– Parmenides and Empedocles on Krasis and Knowledge, in: Apeiron, 5 (Published Online: 10/21/2015), 2015.

Scaliger, Josephus, M. Manilii Astronomicon libri quinque, Iosephus Scaliger Iul. Caes. F. recensuit ac pristino ordini suo restituit. Eiusdem Ios. Scaligeri commentarius in eosdem libros et castigationum explicationes, Lutetiae : apud Mamertum Patissonium Typographum regium, in officina Roberti Stephani 1579, p. 17 (B 13, B 28) and 247 (B 44).

Scarpat, Giuseppe, Salomone astronomo come Empedocle: la vis ventorum nel Libro della Sapienza, in: Studia classica Johanni tarditi oblata, a cura di L. Belloni - G. Milanese - A. Porro, Milano : Vita e pensiero 1995, p. 739-48.

Scarpi, Paolo, Empedocle mago, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, pp. 143-156.

Schiefsky, Mark John, Hippocrates On Ancient Medicine: translated with introduction and commentary, Leiden - Boston: Brill, 2005. (P. 302-305; A 70, B 23, B 84, B 100.)

Schläger, Richard, Empedocles Agrigentinus quatenus Heraclitum Ephesium in philosophia secutus sit scripsit R. S (diss.), in: Jahresbericht über das Karl-Friedrichs-Gymnasium zu Eisenach von Ostern 1877 bis Ostern 1878, Eisenach : Hofbuchdruckerei 1878 (24 p.).

Schefer, Christina, Platon und Apollon, Sankt Augustin : Akademia Verlag, 1996, p. 41-6. (B 3.3-5, B 131, A 23, B 134, B 29, B 134.)

Schibli, Hermann Sadun, Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient Philosophy, in: Ancient Philosophy XVI.2, 1996, p. 455-62 (a detailed reproduction of contents, but almost worthless for Empedoclean studies).

Schiren, T., The Strasbourg Empedocles, in: Zeitschrift für philologische Forschung 56, 2002, p. 472-6 (Review of Martin - Primavesi, Empédocle de Strasbourg, 1999).

Schmitz, Hermann, Der Ursprung des Gegenstandes, Bonn 1988, p. 299-350.

Schneider, Johann Gottlob, Griechisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch, Lipsiae 1819-213. (B 3.11, B 20.7.)

Schneidewin, Friedrich Wilhelm, Neue Verse des Empedokles, in: Philologus 6, 1851, p. 155-67. (B 6, B 36, B 17, B 16, B 29, B 28, B 115, B 110, B 31, B 3.1-2.)

Schnarnagl, Theobald, Der Philosoph Empedokles in seiner Eigenschaft als Dichter, in: Programm des Kommunal-Ober-Gymnasiums in Komotau, Komotau : Spania 1907-1908, p. 3-16, 1908-1909, p. 3-19.

Schofield, Malcolm, s. v. Empedocles, in: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York 1998, III.293-8.

– Review of S. Trépanier, Empedocles, Trépanier (S.) Empedocles. An Interpretation, in: The Classical Review 56.1, 2006, p. 12-14.

– Review of M. M. Sassi, The Presocratics, La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell' età dei Presocratici, in: The Classical Review 58.1, 2008, p. 4-6.

Schöne, Alfred, Die Empedoclea des Sallustius, in: Jahrbücher für klassischen Philologie 12, 1866, p. 751-2 (A 27; printed also separately in Leipzig 1866).

Schottlaender, Rudolf, Drei vorsokratische Topoi, in: Hermes 62, 1927, p. 435-46.

– Apollon und Pythagoras, in: Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 10, 1956, p. 333-351.

Schreckenberg, Heinz, Ananke. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Wortgebrauchs, München 1964, p. 111-3 et passim (B 115, B 30).

Schumacher, Joseph, Der Physis-Begriff bei Empedokles, in: Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften 34, 1941, p. 179-96. (B 8, B 62.).

Schwabl, Hans, Empedokles, fr. B 110, in: Wiener Studien 69, 1956, p. 49-56.

– Zur ‘Theogonie’ bei Parmenides und Empedokles, in: Wiener Studien 70, 1957, p. 278-89 (B 122, B 123, B 128).

– Hesiod und Parmenides, in: Rheinisches Museum 106, 1963, p. 134-42.

Sciavicco, G., Gorgia di Leontini nella letteratura greca di Sicilia: Fonti e sviluppo della sua attività sofistico-retorica, Messina : Scuola Tipografica Antoniana 1939.

Scinà, Domenico, Memorie sulla vita e filosofia d’Empedocle Gergentino I-II, Palermo : Stamperia Reale 1813 (Milano : G. Silvestri 18382; Milano 18583; Palermo 18594, Sangermano 19115; Bologna 19576; Bologna : Capelli 19877).

Sciortino, Calogero, Empedocle: un enigma tra intuizioni e aporie. 2011. http://ubaldoriccobono.wordpress.com/tag/sciortino/

Scoon, Robert Maxwell, Greek Philosophy before Plato, Princeton University Press 1928, p. 82-94.

Seaford, Richard, Immortality, Salvation, and the Elements, in: Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90, 1986, s. 1-26 (B 115).

Sedley, David, Empedocles’ Theory of Vision and Theophrastus’ De sensibus, in: Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings, ed. by W. W. Fortenbaugh - D. Gulas, New Brunswick 1991, p. 20-31 (A 86, par. 8-9). (B 84)

– The Proems of Empedocles and Lucretius, in: Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30, 1989, p. 269-96.

– Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom, Cambridge University Press 1998 (Emp.: Chapter I-II).

– Lucretius and the New Empedocles, in: Leeds International Classical Studies 2/4, 2003, p. 1-12 (= http://www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics).

– Empedocles’ Life Cycles, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003,  ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 331-371 (first presentation of the revised cycle with 60 oscillations of Love's and Strife's dominance: Sphaîros/60 alternating phases of Love followed by Strife/Sphaîros etc.).

– The Empedoclean opening, in: Lucretius, ed. Monica R. Gale, Oxford 2007 (Oxford Readings in Classical Studies), p. 48-87. (A repetition of Chap. 1 of Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom.)

– Creationism and its critics in antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008 (Sather Classical Lectures, 66). (Chap. 2 : Empedocles, p. 31-74; larger parts of this chapter are drawn from Sedley 2005 ; A 70, A 72, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 35, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 76, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 115, B 124, B 128, B 129, a(ii), d, scholies Aristotle; important contribution.)

– Empedoclean Superorganisms, in: Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 111-125. On-line:  http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1/issue-files/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1.xml

Seeck, Gustav Adolf, Empedokles B 17. 9-13, B 8, B 100 bei Aristoteles, in: Hermes 95.1, 1967, p. 28-53.

Seligman, Paul, Soul and Cosmos in Presocratic Philosophy, in: Dionysius Halifax, II, 1978, pp. 5-17. (The author supposes that evolution of conceptions of souls corresponds to evolution of a model of inner existence and inner cosmos: Anaximenes, Heraclitus, Emp.).

Semuškin, Anton Vasiljevič, Empedokl, Moskva : Mysl 1985 (19942; p. 191; an enthusiastic and mystic interpretation of Emp. life and main theses of his teaching à la R. Rolland. Not very original, but fairly interesting. In the end of book the poetic translation of Katharmoi is appended).

– Zagadka Empedokla [The Mystery of Empedocles], in: Istoriko-filosofskij ježegodnik [History of Philosophy Yearbook] 88, 1988, p. 22-37 (author’s psychologic attempt to explain Emp. life and philosophy is based on a presumption of existence two quite different poems expressing two different parts of Emp. personality).

Senis, B., Πείρατος ἐν δεσμοῖσιν. Ἐν πείρασι δεσμῶν, in: Σύγκτισις γ, 1987, p. 66-83 (the meaning of concept moira, B 17 etc.).

Sfameni Gasparro, Giulia, Critica del sacrificio cruento e antropologia in Grecia: Da Pitagora a Porfirio, I. La tradizione pitagorica, Empedocle e l'orfismo, in: Sangue e antropologia I, ed. Francesco Vattioni, Roma: Edizioni pia unione preziosissimo sangue 1987, p. 107-155. (Empedocles: pp. 135-140.)

Sharpe, Charles Henry, The Shoes of Empedocles, in: Proceedings of the Classical Association 27, 1930, p. 9-10.

Shaw, Gregory, Review of P. Kingsley, Reality, in: Brin Mawr Classical Review 2004.07.43 (http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2004/2004-07-43.html).

Shaw, Michael M., Aither and the Four Roots in Empedocles, in: Research in Phenomenology, 2014, Vol. 44, Issue 2, p. 170-93. (B 6, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 38, B 54, B 71, B 78, B 100, B 96, B 98, B 111, B 115.)

Sheppard, Anne, Review of Kingsley, Empedoclea, P. Kingsley: Ancient Philosophy, Mystery and Magic, in: The Classical Review 46.2, 1996, p. 269-71.

Sherman, P., s. v. Empedocles, in: The Encyclopedia Americana, New York - Chicago, 1932, Volume X, p. 299-300 (useless).

Sider, David, Empedocles’ Persika, in: Ancient Philosophy 2, 1982, p. 76-8. (B 34.)

– Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the Poetry of Adhesion, in: Mnemosyne 37, 1984, p. 14-24. (B 96.)

– review of Empedocles: The Extant Fragments, by M.R. Wright, 1981, in: Ancient Philosophy, 5, 1985, p. 314-317. (B3, B4, B 12, B 17, B 22, B 38,  B 57, B 129, B 133, B 146.)

Siegel, Rudolf E., Theories of Vision and Colour Perception of Empedocles and Democritus: some Similarities to the modern Approach, in: Bulletin of the History of Medicine 33, 1959, p. 145-59 (A 86, par. 7-9, A 912) [read in abbreviated form at the thirty-first annual meeting of the American Association for the History of Medicine, New York, May 22, 1958].

Simondon, Michèle, La Muse d’Empédocle: Patronage mythique des formes du savoir, in: Formation et survie des mythes, travaux et mémoires, Actes du Ier colloque du Centre d’études mythologiques de l’Université Paris X, Nanterre, 19-20 avril 1974, Paris : Les Belles Lettres, 1977, p. 21-9 (B 3, B 4, B 131).

– La Mémoire et l’oubli dans la pensée grecque jusqu’à la fin du Ve siècle avant J.-C: psychologie archaïque, mythes et doctrines, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1982 (B 3, B 105, B 117, B 115, B 128, B 129).

Singer, Charles, The strange histories of some anatomical terms, in; Medical History, 3(1), 1959, p. 1-7. (B 70.)

Sinnige, Theo, Gerard, Matter and infinity in the Presocratic schools and Plato, Assen: Van Gorcum & Co. 1968, (Wijsgerige teksten en studies, 17). (Chapter V: Empedocles, p. 111-118. P. 198-201, and several other pages. B 2, B 3, B 6, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17, B 27, B 29, B 129, B 134, B 135.)

Sisko, John E., Anaxagoras and Empedocles in the Shadow of Elea, in: The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. J. Warren - F. Sheffield, New York-London: Routledge 2014, p. 57-63.

Sitzler, Jakob, Jahresbericht über die griechischen Lyriker ... für 1888-1891: Empedokles, in: Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft 75, 1893, p. 246-7 (B 156: some textual suggestions and the defension of authenticity of verses).

Skarsouli, Pénélope, Compte rendu de l’ouvrage de Simon Trépanier, Empedocles. An Interpretation (2004), in: Revue philosophique de Louvain 103/1-2, 2005, s. 194-9.

– Calliope, a Muse Apart: Some Remarks on the Tradition of Memory as a Vehicle of Oral Justice, in: Oral Tradition 21/1, 2006, p. 210-228 (B 131: s. 220-23 = http://journal.oraltradition.org/issues/21i/skarsouli).

– La paroimia en tant que forme discursive chez les Présocratiques. Réflexions sur Empédocle et Héraclite, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXIII(2), 2005, pp. 39-54. (B 24, B 25.)

– Review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, in: Revue philosophique de Louvain, 105(1-2), 2007, pp. 162-168.

– S'interroger sur la relation entre couleurs et mots. Le terme Phármakon chez Empédocle in: L'Antiquité en couleurs : catégories, pratiques, représentations, M. Carastro (éd.), Grenoble : J. Millon, 2009, pp. 165-177. (B 23, B 21, B 96, B 3.) 

– ‘Confiner le monde par des mots’. Réflexions sur la cosmologie (et la) poétique d'Empédocle : le terme πεῖραρ, in: Texte du monde - Monde du texte, ed. I. Milliat-Pilot, Grenoble: J. Millon, 2010, (coll. Horos), pp. 231-244. (B 17.15, B 17.25-26, B 17.12-13, B 24.)

–  Des papyri grecs en contexte funéraire. L'exemple de "l'Empédocle de Strasbourg", in: Mètis N.S. 8, 2010, pp. 167-187.

Skarsouli, Penelope - Lalou, Aggeliki, Εμπεδοκλης. Περι φύσεως, Αθήνα : Εκδ. του Εικοστού πρώτου 1999, 345 p. (introduction, translation, and short commentary on Peri physeos).

Skemp, Joseph Bright, The Theory of Motion in Plato’s Later Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1942, p. 52-64 (chap. 4: “Antecedents of the κίνησις-doctrine of the ‘Timaeus’ in the System of Empedocles”). Reprint in 2013.

Slings, Simon R., Monίh in Empedocles and a Rule of Greek Word Formation, in: Mnemosyne 44, 1991, p. 413-15 (B 28, B 29).

Smith, Martin Ferguson, Fragments of Diogenes of Oenoanda Discovered, in: American Journal of Archaelogy 74, 1970, p. 51-74 (Emp.: p. 58-60: A 99).

– New Readings in the Text of Diogenes of Oenoanda, in: Classical Quarterly 22, 1972, p. 162 (A 99).

– Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, Napoli 1993 (A 99).

Snell, Bruno, Hera als Erdgöttin, in: Philologus 50, 1943, p. 159-60 (B 6).

– Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studies zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen, Hamburg 19553, p. 284-98.

Snyder, Jane McIntosh, Lucretius Empedoclean Sicily, in: The Classical World 65, 1972, p. 217-8 (A 21).

Solmsen, Felix, Zur griechischen Wortforschung, in: Indogermanische Forschungen 31, 1912-3, p. 448-506.

Solmsen, Friedrich, Tissues and the Soul, in: Philosophical Review 59, 1950, p. 435-41.

– Aristotle and Presocratic Cosmogony, in: Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63, 1958, p. 265-82.

– Greek philosophy and the discovery of the nerves, in: Museum Helveticum, 18.3, 1961, p. 150-167. (B 98, B 105.) 

– Nature as Craftsman in Greek Thought, in: Journal of the History of Ideas 24, 1963, p. 473-96. (Emp.: p. 476-9).

– A Review of Reiche, in: American Journal of Philology 84, 1963, p. 91-4.

– Love and Strife in Empedocles’ Cosmogony, in: Phronesis 10, 1965, p. 109-48.

– ζωρός in Empedocles, in: The Classical Review 17, 1967, p. 245-6. (B 35.15.)

– Eternal and temporary beings in Empedocles’ physical poem, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57, 1975, p. 123-45. 

– Empedocles’ Hymn to Apollo, in: Phronesis 25(3), 1980, p. 219-27. (B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135.)

– Reincarnation in Ancient and Early Christian Thought, in: F. Solmsen, Kleine Schriften III, Hidelsheim - Zürich - New York: G. Olms 1982, p. 465-494.  (B 117, B 129.)

Söring, Jürgen, Nietzsches Empedokles-Plan, in: Nietzsche Studien 19, 1990, p. 176-211.

Souilhé, Joseph, L’énigme d´Empédocle, in: Archives de Philosophie 9/3, 1932, p. 337-59.

Sprague, Rosamond K., Empedocles, Hera, and Cratylus 404 C, in: The Classical Review 22, 1972, p. 169. (B 6.)

Spoerri, Walter, “Crescebant uteri terram radicibus apti”: à propos de la zoogonie de Lucrèce (De rerum natura 5, 791 sqq.), in: Nomen latinum: Mélanges de langue, de littérature et de civilisation latine offerts au professeur André Schneider, ed. Denis Knoepfler, Faculté des lettres de Neuchâtel, Genève 1997, p. 55-82 (a comparison between Lucretius and Emp. is appended in appendix).

Sprengel, Kurt Polycarp Joachim, Empedoclis commenta de Protogaea illustraturus iuvenis ornatissimi Bernhardi Casimiri Iosephi Góra, Poloni, disputationem inauguralem die XVII. ian. MDCCCXXV. habendam eiusque promotionem celebrandam indicit, Halae : Typis F. A. Grunerti patris filiique 1825.

Staab, Gregor, Pythagoras in der Spätantike, München – Leipzig : K. G. Saur 2002, pp. 56-7 (Emp. as a Pythagoras’ pupil).

Stamatellos, Giannis, Plotinus and the Presocratics: A Philosophical Study of Presocratic Influences in Plotinus' Enneads, Albany (New York) : Sunypress, 2007. B 115 (pp. 166-168), (B 120 (p. 167), B 134 (p. 38).

– Introduction to Presocratics: a thematic approach to early Greek philosophy with key readings, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2012. (Mostly influenced by M.R. Wright.)

Staugaard, K. E., Empedokles, “Physiolog eller poet?”, in: Museum Tusculanum 40, 1980, p. 23-38.  

Stehle, Eva, The Adressees of Empedokles, Katharmoi Fr. B 112: Performance and Moral Implications, in: Ancient Philosophy 25/2, 2005, p. 247-72 (B 112.1-5, B 132, B 128, B 146, B 147).

Steiger, Kornél, The Cosmology of Parmenides and Empedocles, in: Homonoia 2, 1980, p. 159-165 (summary of PhD thesis). (p. 15-16?? instead of 159-165?)

– Parmenidész és Empedoklész töredékei. Parmenidész és Empedoklész kozmológiája. (2. kiadás: Áron Kiadó 1998., Parmenidész és Empedoklész kozmológiája címen.), Budapest : Gondolat, 1985.

– Die Kosmologie des Parmenides und Empedocles, in: Oikumene 5, 1986, p. 173-236.

Stein, Heinrich, Empedoclis Agrigentini Fragmenta disposuit recensuit adnotavit, Bonn: Adolph Marcus 1852. (In Google books.)

– Zu Empedokles, in: Philologus 15, 1860, p. 143-6 (B 160).

Stein, Paulus, TERAS, diss. Marpurgi Cattorum, 1909, p. 16, n. 1: Plut. Mor. 1123 B = DK 31 ad B 60: in the text a rare form τεράσμασιν should be read, a parallel is Aesch. Agam. 125: τερᾴζω.

Steiner, Deborah Tarn, Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought, Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001, p. 140-141. (It is necessary to read in B 62.8 enopen, „voice“.)

Steinhart, Karl Heinz August, Meletemata Plotiniana etc. Epimetron, loci duo Parmenidei, tres Empedoclei emendati, Numburgi 1840, p. 59-60 (B 3.9-13, B 90, B 111.8). 

– s. v. Empedokles, in: Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste, hrsg. von J. S. Ersch - J. G. Gruber, Leipzig : F. Brockhaus 1840, Band 34, p. 83-105.

Stengel, Paul, Spondὰj tέmnein, in: Berliner philologisch Wochenschrift 39, 1907, p. 1247-8 (B 143).

Stephanus, Henricus (= Estienne, Henri), Poesis Philosophica, Geneva 1573, p. 16-31.

Stern, Samuel Miklos, s. v. Anbaduklís, in: Encyclopédie de l’Islam, Leiden - Londres : Brill 19602 (19863), I.498 (I.483-4).

– Ibn Masarra, Follower of Pseudo-Empedocles: An Illusion, in: Actas do 4. Congresso de Estudos Árabes e Islâmicos, Coimbra-Lisboa 1968, Leiden 1971, p. 325- 37.

Stettner, Walter, Die Seelenwanderung bei Griechen und Römern, (Tübinger Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft, XXII. Heft), Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stutthart - Berlin 1934, p. 19-31 et passim (on Emp. daimonology: B 115, B 117, B 118 etc.).

Stevens, Annick, La physique d’Empédocle selon Simplicius, in: Revue Belge de philologie et d’histoire 67, 1989, p. 65-74 (an instructive article on the logic of Simplicius’ interpretation of Empedocle. No doubt, the views of Simplicius are biased with his neoplatonic position, but the author believes they are coherent, interesting and relatively near to the real doctrine of Empedocles. S. was more precise and informative than Aristotle).

Stokes, Michael C., One and Many in Presocratic Philosophy, Washington : Harvard University Press 1971, p. 153-174 (Chap. 6: Empedocles: B 17, B 62, B 26, B 22, etc.).

Stratton, George, Malcom, Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle, London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1917, New York: MacMillan, 1917.

Stroumsa Guy G, review of Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic- Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition by Peter Kingsley, in: Numen Vol. 44 issue 2, 1997

Stroumsa, Sarah I., review of D. de Smet, Empedocles Arabus, in: Journal of the American Oriental Society 122, January 2002, p. 94-7.

Struve, Karl Ludwig, De elementis Empedoclis dissertatio pro veni legendi, Dorpati : Literis Michaelis Gerhardi Grenzii, typographi academici 1805.

Sturz, Friedrich Wilhelm, Animadversionum in Empedoclis carmina specimen I-II, in: Commentarii societatis philologicae Lipsiensis 1, 1801, p. 24-34 a 262-74 (B 25, B 28, B 63, B 65, B 78, B 93, B 101 etc.).

– Empedocles Agrigentinus. De vita et philosophia eius exposuit, carminum reliquias ex antiquis scriptoribus collegit, recensuit, illustravit, praefationem et indices adiecit M. Frider. Guil. Sturz, Leipzig: Göschen 1805. (In Google books.)

Sulzberger, Max-Raymond, La Physique d’Empédocle, in: Mélanges Bidez (= Annuaire de l’Institut de philologie et d’histoire orientales 2), Brouxelles 1934, p. 913-5.

Susemihl, Franz, Über das Verhältnis des Gorgias zum Empedokles, in: Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 26/73, 1856, p. 40-2.

– Beiträge zur griechischen Litteratugeschichte 5: Gorgias und die attische Prosa, in: Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 115, 1877, p. 793-9.

Suzuki, M., Preface to Empedocles, in: Journal of Classical Studies 25, 1977, p. 20-31 (B 17.8, B 20.2-5; japanic, résumé in English).

Svenbro, Jesper, Voir en voyant. La perception visuelle chez Empédocle, in: Métis N. S. 2, 2004, p. 47-70 (B 84, B 88, B 17.21).S

Sweeney, Leo, s. j., Infinity in the Presocratics: a bibliographical and philosophical study, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1972. (Empedocles: p. 137-144.)

Świercz, Piotr, Problematyka arche/archai w kosmogoniach orfickich w świetle filozofii Heraklita z Efezu, Empedoklesa z Akragas i nurtu pitagorejskiego, in: Littera Antiqua, 1, 2010, p. 106-121. On-line  http://www.litant.eu/artykuly/nr1/LA%201.pdf 

Symonds, John, Addington, Studies of the Greek Poets, 1873 (First edition, several reprints). (P. 37-64; 2nd edition : p. 38 ss. ; 3rd edition 1893: p. 191-219.)

Szabó, A., Le scienze in Magna Grecia, in: Megale Hellas, a cura di G. Pugliese Carratelli, Milano : Scheiwiller 1983, p. 555-84.

TTT

Taeger, Fritz, Isokrates und die Anfänge des Hellenistischen Herrscherkultes, in: Hermes 72, 1937, p. 355-60 (on Emp. as a god, B 112.4).

Taillardat, Jean, Le sens d’ “amorgos” (Empédocle, fr. 84 Diels) et les lanternes dans l’antiquité, in: Revue des études grecques 72, 1959, p. xi-xii.

Tamagnone, Carlo, Empedocle, pp. 108-117, in: Ateismo filosofico nel mondo antico : religione, naturalismo, materialismo, atomismo, scienza : la nascita della filosofia atea, Firenze : Clinamen. 2005. (Il diforàno ; 13.)

Tannery, Paul, La cosmogonie d´Empédocle, in: Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 24, 1887/2, p. 285-300 (= http://gallica.bnf.fr/).

– Pour l’Histoire de la science hellène. De Thalès à Empédocle, Paris 1887, p. 313-47 (Paris : Gauthier-Villars 19302).

– Fragments des médecins grecs, in: P. Tannery, Mémoires scientifiques IX: Philologie, 1880-1928, Toulouse : Privat - Paris : Gauthier-Villars 1929, p. 299-309 (p. 306-7: B 100).

Tarán, Leonardo, Parmenides, Princeton University Press 1965.

– The Text of Simplicius’ Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, in: Simplicius. Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie. Actes du colloque international de Paris (28 sept. - 1 er oct. 1985), ed. J. Hadots, Berlin - New York 1987, p. 246-66.

Tarrant, Harold, Salvation from God in the De mundo and Numenius, in: The Idea of Salvation: Papers from the Conference on the Idea of Salvation, Sacred and Secular, held at St. Paul’s College, University of Sydney, 22-25 August, 1986, Auckland : University of Auckland 1988, p. 24-30 (= Prudentia 20, 1988, Suppl.).

Tate, J., Empedocles as animist, Jean Zafiropulo: Empédocle d'Agrigente, in: The Classical Review 5.1, 1955, p. 48-50.

Tatum, W. Jeffrey, The Presocratics in Book One of Lucretius’ De rerum natura, in: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 114, 1984, p. 177-89 (on Lucretius’ handling with Presocratics, especially with Emp.).

Taylor, Alfred Edward, A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Oxford 1928.

Ten Brink, Bernard, Empedoclea, in: Philologus 6, 1851, p. 730-4 (B 6).

Tennemann, Wilhelm Gottlieb - Wendt, Amadeus, Grundriss der Geschichte des Philosophie für den akademischen Unterricht, 5e ed. (1825), Leipzig 1829, (Empedocles: pp. 91-93). French traduction of the 5th ed. by Cousin, Victor, Manuel de l’histoire de la philosophie, Tome I, Paris 1829, (Empedocles, pp. 112-125).

- Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie bis auf Sokrates, Leipzig 1829. (Empedocles: pp. 275-318).

Therme, Anne-Laure, Est-ce par un tourbillon que l'amour empédocléen joint ? L'hypothèse de l'aimantation, in: Philosophie antique 7, 2007, 91-119. A 50, A 87, A 89, B 17, B 27, B 35, B 75, B 89, B 109.

Ross Hernández, José Alberto, Respuesta a las teorías de Empédocles y Anaxágoras, pp. 53-56, In: Dios, eternidad y movimiento en Aristóteles. Pamplona : EUNSA, 2007. (Filosófica; 198.)

Ritter, August Heinrich., Über die philosophische Lehre des Empedokles, in: Litterarische Analekten, vorzüglich für alte Litteratur und Kunst, deren Geschichte und Methodik, ed. F.A. Wolf, Vol. II, part 4, Berlin: G.C. Nauck 1818, reprint in 1820, p. 411-460. (In Archive.org.)

– Geschichte der Philosophie, Vol. I, Hamburg: F. Perthes 1829, p. 506-539. (18362: p. 532-572 ).

– Histoire de la philosophie, Tome I, Première partie, trad. C.-J. Tissot, Paris: Ladrange 1835, p. 429-457. (In Google books.)

– The history of ancient philosophy, Vol. I, trans. A. J. W. Morrison, Oxford – Londres : D. A. Talboys, 1838, p. 487-524. 

Ritter, August Heinrich - Preller, Ludwig, Historia philosophiae graeco-romanae, Hamburg: F. Perthes 18381 (p. 108- 127 = § 168-181), Gotha: F.A. Perthes 1857² (p. 124-152 = § 167-180), 18643, Gotha: F.A. Perthes 18694 (p. 105-129 = § 167-180), 18755, Gotha: F.A. Perthes 18786 (p. 87-111 = § 129-142), Gotha: F.A. Perthes 18867 (p. 124-153 = § 129-142 B), Gotha: 18887 (p. 124-153 = § 129-142 B), 18988, 19139, Gotha: L. Klotz 193410 (p. 126-155 = § 162-184). 

Rives, James B., The Theology of Animal Sacrifice in the ancient Greek World: origins and developments, in: Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice, ed. J.W. Knust and Z. Várhelyi, Oxford University Press 2011, p. 187–202. (Empedocles: p. 189-194, B 137.)

Robertson, Noel, Religion and Reconciliation in Greek cities: The Sacred Laws of Selinus and Cyrene, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010. (Empedocles at Selinus: p. 152-153.)

Robin, Léon, La Pensée Grecque et les origines de l’esprit scientifique, (L’évolution de l’humanité), Paris : La Renaissance du Livre 1923 (Paris : La Renaissance du Livre 19322, Paris : A. Michel 19483, 19634, 19733: p. 123-136), p. 119-134. (B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 27, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 62, B 84, B 96, B 100, B 111, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 134.)

Rodríguez Moreno, Inmaculada, ΔΑΙΜΟΝΕΣ, ΗΡΩΕΣ Υ ΑΓΓΕΛΟΙ en la filosofía presocrática, in: HABIS, 26,1995, p. 29-46.  http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/fichero_articulo?codigo=58043&orden=0

Roecklein, Robert, J., Parmenides' influence on Empedocles and Anaxagoras, in: Plato versus Parmenides: the Debate over Coming-into-being in Greek Philosophy, Lanham (Maryland): Lexington Books 2011, p. 57-81. (B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 28, B 29, B 23, B 35, B 62.)

Roeper, Gottlieb, Emendationsversuche zu Hippolyti Philosophumena, in: Philologus 7, 1857, p. 511-54 and 606-31, p. 606 (ad B 117 = A 31).

Rohde, Erwin, Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen, Freiburg i. B. - Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr 1894, § 6, p. 465-480. Same title in Tübingen 19218, p. 171-187.

Rolland, Romain, Empédocle d’Agrigente et l’Âge de la Haine, Paris : La maison française d’art et d’édition 1918 (= R. Rolland, Empédocle d’Agrigente suivi de l’Éclair de Spinoza, Paris : Éditions du Sablier 1931, p. 17-104).

Roloff, Dietrich, Gottänhlichkeit, Vergöttlichung und Erhöhung zu seligen Leben. Untersuchungen zur Herkunft der platonischen Angleichung an Gott, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1970. (Pages 192-197: the text is devoted to Katharmoi, ie. daimon and its pollution, earth as an underworld and especially to attitude god – man.)

Roos, Carl, Nietzsches Empedokles-Fragmenter: Introduktion og fortolking, København 1937.

Roscher, Wilhelm Heinrich, Die Hebdomadenlehren der griechischen Philosophen und Ärzte. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechische Philosophie und Medizin, Der Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Klasse der königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 24/6, Leipzig : Teubner 1906, p. 35-36 (the role of the number seven in Empedoclean embryology (B 153a, A 82) was influenced by teaching of old-Pythagorean school)

Rosenfeld-Löffler, Annette, see first publication under Loeffler, Annette.

– La Poétique d’Empédocle. La signification cosmologique de l’expression poétique de l’oeuvre d’Empédocle (diss.), Université de Lausanne 2001.

– La Poétique d’Empédocle. Cosmologie et métaphore, Bern : Peter Lang 2006 (gently modified version of previous title). 

Rösler, Wolfgang, Reflexe vorsokratischen Denkens bei Aischylos, Meisenheim 1970.

– Lukrez und die Vorsokratiker. Doxographische Probleme im 1. Buch von De rerum natura, in: Hermes 101, 1973, p. 48-64 (A 21).

– Der Anfang der Katharmoi des Empedokles, in: Hermes 111.2, 1983, p. 170-9.

– Orfismo en Empédocles, in: Taula, 27-28, 1997, pp. 33-59. (A Spanish traduction of Ophisches bei Empedokles, 1995).

–  'Sphaira', o la magia della rotondità perfetta nel pensiero dei Greci, 'Sphaira' or the Magic Perfect Roundedness in Greek Thought, in: Esprit sphérique, ed. Marisa Bertoldini M., Lugano - Milano : (Fondazione Galleria Gottardo, Lugano) Charta 2006, p. 309-319, 392-396. (B 27, B 29, B 134.)

Rispoli, Gioia Maria, Empedocle nelle testimonianze ermarchee, in: Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, pp. 241-269.

Ramnoux, Clémence, Vocabulaire et structures de la pensée archaïque chez Héraclite, diss., Paris: Société d’Édition “Les Belles Lettres” 1959, p. 140-207 et p. 427-47 (commentaries of B 3, B 106-9, B 112, B 110, B 129, B 115, B 21, B 57, B 22, B 62, B 6, B 16, B 27, B 31, B 35, B 119, B 121, B 124, B 20, B 26, B 17).

– L'amour du lointain, in: Revue de la Méditerranée, 1960. (in Ramnoux, Études présocratiques, Paris : Klincksieck 1970 – B 106, B 110, B 129.)

– Les fragments d’un Empédocle de Fr. Nietzsche, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale 2/70, 1965, p. 199-212. (In Ramnoux., Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970).

– Études présocratiques III: Hippolyte, « Contre les hérésies » VII, 383 à 399, in: Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 92/157, 1967, p. 31-41, (Translation in French of Hippolytus. B 6, B 29, B 110, B 115, B 131, B 17.)

– Études présocratiques, III: Hippolyte, « Contre les hérésies » VII, 383 à 399 (suite), in: Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 94/159, 1969, p. 187-209. (Commentary. B 29, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 131, B 134.)

– Pourquoi les Présocratiques ?, in: Revue philosophique de Louvain, tome 66, n° 91, 1968, p. 397-419. (in Ramnoux, Études présocratiques, Paris : Klincksieck 1970 – B6, B 128.)

– Héraclite ou l’homme entre les choses et les mots, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1968 (B 2, B 3, B 6, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 24, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 38, B 59, B 62, B 71, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 110, B 111, B 122, B 123, B 131, B 137, B 115, etc.).

– Empédocle, in: Histoire de la philosophie, Tome I, Orient – Antiquité – Moyen Âge, ed. B. Parain, Paris: Gallimard 1969, (Encyclopédie de la Pléiade, n° 26), p. 439-442.

– Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, (Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences humaines de Paris-Nanterre, essais n° 4). (Four previous articles regarding Empedocles are taken up: (1) Études présocratiques III: Hippolyte, « Contre les hérésies »  VII, 383 à 399, p. 94-121; (2) Tradition et cosmologie chez Empédocle d'Agrigente which is actually Pourquoi les Présocratiques ? with a new title, p. 123-141; (3) Les fragments d’un Empédocle de Fr. Nietzsche, p. 143-156; L'amour du lointain, p. 157-173).

– Tradition et cosmologie chez Empédocle d’Agrigente, in: Études présocratiques II, Paris: Klincksieck 1983, p. 154-72 (which is actually Pourquoi les Présocratiques ? with a new title).

– La Nuit et les enfants de la Nuit dans la tradition grecque, Paris : Flammarion 1986 (B 115, B 121, B 128).

Rangos, Spyros,  On Empedocles’ death (= “« Κύκλου δ’ ἐξέπταν βαθυπενθέος ἀργαλέοιο »: Περί της Εμπεδοκλέους τελευτής”), in: Hypomnema (= Υπόμνημα στη Φιλοσοφία) 9, 2010, p. 53-84. - https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/spyros-rangos

– Empedocles on divine nature, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2012/3, p. 315-338. http://www.cairn.info/resume.php?ID_ARTICLE=RMM_123_0315  (B 6, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, , B 59, B 115, B 122, B 128, B 133, B 134, B 146, B 147)

Rappe, Guido, Animismus, Hylozoismus und Sphairos des Empedokles, in: Rehabilitierung des subjektiven: Festschrift für Hermann Schmitz, hrsg. von M. Grossheim - H.-J. Waschkies, Bonn : Bouvier 1993, p. 387-412.

– Wiedergeburt als Mnemotechnik - Zur Anthropologie bei Empedokles und Platon, in: Wiedergeburt und kulturelles Erbe / Reincarnation and Cultural Heritage / Ergebnisse und Beträge des Internationalen Symposiums der Hermann-und-Marianne-Strantik-Stiftung, ed. W. Schweidler, Weingarten 1999, Sankt Augustin : Academia Verlag 2001, p. 61-85.

Rashed, Marwan, Review of D. de Smet, Empedocles Arabus. Une lecture néoplatonicienne tardive, in:Elenchos 22, 2001, p. 440-444.

– La chronographie du système d’Empédocle: documents byzantins inédits, in: Aevum Antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 237-59 (Scholia, B 115, B 128).

– reimpr. in: Rashed, Marwan, L'Héritage aristotélicien : textes inédits de l'Antiquité, Paris : Les Belles Lettres, 2007, pp. 543-565.

– The structure of the eye and its cosmological function in Empedocles: Reconstruction of fragment 84 D.-K., in: Reading ancient texts. Volume I: Presocratics and Plato - Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, edited by Suzanne Stern-Gillet and Kevin Corrigan, Leiden / Boston: Brill, 2007, (Brill’s studies in intellectual history, 161.), pp. 21-39.

– Le proème des Catharmes d’Empédocle. Reconstitution et commentaire, in: Elenchos, 29, fasc. 1, 2008, pp. 7-37. (B 112, B 114, B 115, B 113, B 119, B 121.)

– De qui la clepsydre est-elle le nom ? Une interprétation du fragment 100 d'Empédocle, in: Revue des études grecques, tome 121, 2008(2), pp. 443-468. (B 100.)

– La zoogonie de la Haine selon Empédocle : retour sur l'ensemble 'd' du papyrus d'Akhmim, in: Phronesis 56, 2011, pp. 33-57.

– La chronographie du système d'Empédocle : addenda et corrigenda, in: Les Etudes philosophiques, 2014, n°3, p. 315-342. (Byzantine scholia, B 30, B 35, B 96, B 115, B 129, B 143.)

http://www.cairn.info/mon_panier.php?ID_ARTICLE=LEPH_143_0315

Rathmann, Wilhelm Walter, Quaestiones Pythagorae Orphicae Empedocleae, Halle 1933. (B 115, B 129, B 133, B 134.)

Raynaud, J.-P., De Empedocle (diss.), Ex typis Silbermann, Argentorati 1849 (28 p.).

Reale, Giovanni, Introduzione 3: Il confronto (di Heraclito) con Empedocle: La „coincidentia oppositorum“ e il ciclo cosmico, in: Marcovich, Miroslav – Mondolfo, Rodolpho – Tarán, Leonard, Eraclito. Testimonianze, imitazioni e frammenti. Introduzione di G. Reale, Milano 2007, p. cxxix-xxxix.

Regenbogen, Otto, Eine Forschungsmethode antiker Naturwissenschaft, in: Quellen und Studien für Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, Abteilung B 1, 1930, p. 131-182.

Reiche, Harald Anton, Empedocles’ Mixture, Eudoxan Astronomy and Aristotle’s “connate pneuma”, Adolf M. Hakkert - Publisher, Amsterdam 1960, p. 9-100 (148 p.). (B 27, B 28, B 134)

Reinach, Salomon, Le texte d’Empédocle, étude critique, in: L’instruction publique, revue des lettres, sciences et arts 1-4, 1876, p. I.165-7, II.183-4, III.247-9 and IV.277-9.

Reinhardt, Karl, Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie, Bonn 1916.

– Kosmos und Sympathie: neue Untersuchungen über Poseidonios, München: C.H. Beck 1926.

– Empedokles, Orphiker und Physiker, in: Classical Philology 45, 1950, p. 170-9 (= in: Um die Begriffswelt der Vorsokratiker, hrsg. von H.-G. Gadamer, Darmstadt : Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 19681, 19832, 19893).

Renehan, Robert F., On the Greek Origins of the Concepts Incorporeality and Immateriality, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 21, 2, 1980, p. 105-138. (B 17, B 100, B 134.)

Renius, C., Three Views of a Candle, in: Journal of Philosophy 40, 1943, p. 633-4 (Emp., Heracl., Pyth.). 

Renouvier, Charles , Manuel de philosophie ancienne, Tome I, Paris: Paulin 1844. (Empédocle:  p. 163-182.)

Rhee Kee-Back, Empedocles’ Influence on Hippocratic Medicine, in: Korean J Med Hist 22, p. 879-914, 2013. (Korean language, abstarct in English.) http://medhist.kams.or.kr/2013/22-3-7.pdf

Rider, Zackary P., Empedocles, Epicurus, and the Failure of Sacrifice in Lucretius, Thesis in classics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2011.

Riedel, Manfred, Empedokles und die Entmachtung der Physis, in: Synthesis Philosophica (Zagreb) 5/10, 1990, p. 367-77 (= Empedoklo i razmoćenje prirode, in: Filozofskaja Istraživanja (Zagreb) 10/37, 1990, p. 913-22).

Riedweg, Christoph, Orphisches bei Empedokles, in: Antike und Abendland 41, 1995, p. 34-59.

Ragot, P., Une construction archaïque chez Empédocle,  in: Études classiques, 72(3), 2004, p.195-216. 

Rambaldi, Simone. Empedocle e la bonifica di Selinunte: un breve riesame - in: Selinunte si racconta : Cam 5 maggio 2010, CAMCANTIERE/3, 2010, p. 12-17.

Radif, Ludovica, Il logos eracliteo/empedocleo e la potenza ancestrale del filosofo sciamano, in: Giornale di metafisica 23, 2001, p. 257-80 (B 111).

Radlov, Ernest Lvovič, Empedokl, in: Žurnal ministerstva narodnago prosveščenija, otdel klassičeskoj filologii, 1889, sixth decade, parts 261-3, part 261 (February), p. 81-96, part 261 (March), p. 97-100, part 262 (April), p. 1-32, and part 263 (May), p. 33-51 (study and translation of some testimonies and fragments).

– Demetrio Lacone ed Empedocle, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, p. 270-276. (B 100.1-2, B 142, with a discussion of the articles by A. Martin and O. Primavesi on B 142.)

– Empedocle e gli epicurei, la testimonianza dei papiri ercolanesi, in: Quaderni di Atene e Roma. Cinque incontri sulla cultura classica, ed. M. Caposso, Lecce: Pensa Multimedia 2015, p. 71-81.

RRR

Panagiotou, S., Empedocles on his own Divinity, in: Mnemosyne 36, 1983, p. 276-85.

Pancamo, E., Empedocle e Pirandello. La continuità dello spirito classico nella terra Agrigentina. Discorso, Agrigento-Dima : Liceo classico Empedocle 1955, 26 p. (an inaugural discourse starting academical year of Lyceum ‘Empédocle’ in Agrigento).

Panzerbieter, Friedrich, Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Empedokles (diss.), in: Einladungs-Programm des Gymnasium Bernhardinum in Meiningen, Meiningen 1844.

– Zu Empedokles, in: Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft 3, 1845, col. 883-7 and 889-93.

Paolucci, P., Zoogonia lucreziana: Una versione scientifica, De rerum natura 5, 783-825, in: Lingue tecniche del greco e del latino 2, Atti del Ii seminario internazionale sulla letteratura scientifica e tecnica greca e latina, Trieste, 4-5 ottobre 1993, a cura di S. Sconocchia - L. Toneatto, Bologna : Pàtron 1997, p. 93-103.

Papabasileiou, G. A., Κριτικαι παρατηρήσεις εις Πλουτάρχου Τα Ηθικά, in: Αθηνα 10, 1898, p. 167-242 (A 72 etc.).

Parker, Robert, Miasma, Oxford 1983, p. 301 (B 140).

–  Early orphism in: A. Powell (ed.), The Greek world, London/New York : Routledge, 1995, p. 498-499. B 115.

Pascal, Carlo, L'imitazione di Empedocle nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio, in: Rendiconti della R accademia di archeologia, lettero e belle-arti di Napoli : Tipografia della R. Università 1902, p. 59-85. (Stab. Tip. della R. Università A. Tessitore e Figlio, 1902 - 29 pages, reprint in: C. Pascal, Graecia Capta, Florence, Le Monnier 1905, p. 129-151. Facsimile Publisher, Delhi 110052, India, distributed by Gyan Books.) (B 22, B 35, B 38, B 73, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 130, B 136, B 137.)

Patočka, Jan, Předsokratovská filosofie [The Presocratic Philosophy], (skriptum FF), Praha 1968, p. 126-143.

Pearson, Alfred Chilton, Review of the first edition of FVS, in: The Classical Review 23, 1909, p. 48-50.

Peithmann, Ernst Christian Heinrich, Empedocles, Bitterfeld - Leipzig : F. E. Baumann 1901, (series: “Biographia Antique oder ein Bericht über das Leben und die Schriften der ältern und neueren Magier, Kabbalisten und Philosophen, sowie einiges über die Grundsätze und Lehren der ersten Urheber und Stifter der magischen und okkulten Wissenschaften”, Zweite Serie: Ältere griechische Philosophen, Berichte über deren Leben, Lehren und Schriften, Heft 3), (19 p.). – Die Naturphilosophie vor Sokrates, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 8/1, 1901, p. 214-63 and 308-42, Empedocles: p. 231-45 (very general and little substantial outline of basic theses of E. Physics with regard to Parmenides’ philosophy; worthless). 

Peixoto, Miriam Campolina Diniz, Review of Livio Rossetti e Carlo Santaniello, Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, in: Síntese, Revista de filosofia, vol. 32, no 102, 2005, p. 131-135.  http://www.faje.edu.br/periodicos2/index.php/Sintese/article/view/515/1158

Pelikan, Christina, Empedokles, Leben, Lehre und Rezeption durch Hölderlin, Universitat Koblenz-Landau. 2008-2009/ Magister Philosophie und Germanistik. http://www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/koblenz/fb2/ik/institut/philosophie/lehrende/meyer/pelikan.pdf

Pellati, Francesco, La dottrina degli elementi nella fisica di Vitruvio, in: Rinascimento 2, 1951, p. 241-59 (about possible influence of Emp. theory of 4 roots on Vitruvius).

Pender, Elizabeth.E., ‘Perforated right through’ - why Plato borrows Empedocles’ klepsydra, in: Leeds International Classical Studies 11.2, 2013. http://lics.leeds.ac.uk/2013/201302.pdf  (B 8, B 9, B 23, B 26, B 33, B 34, B 35, B 38, B 52, B 62, B 71, B 84, B 87, B 90, B 96, B 100, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 146.)

Pepple, John, A Lost Fragment of Empedocles, in: Journal of Value Inquiry 18, 1996, p. 169-186.

Peppmüller, Rudolf Heinrich (ed), Kleine philologische Schriften von Theodor Bergk, II, zur griechischen Literatur, Halle 1886, (Opuscula philologica Bergkiana, Volume II). Empedocles: p. 3-66.

Pereira, Ivanete, Considerações sobre Empédocles e a orden órfico-pitagórica, in: Hypnos, 11, 2003(2), p. 98-111.

–Aspectos sagrados do mito e do lógos: poesia hesiódica e filosofia de Empédocles, São Paulo: EDUC (PUC-SP Editora) 2006. (Diss. de Mestrado em Filosofia - PUC-SP, 2003)

Périllié, Jean-Luc, La métaphore du sentier (atrapos) chez Aristophane et Empédocle. Le ridicule d'un profanateur de la philosophie, in: Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, XXVII (2), 2009, p. 63-97. (B 112, B 129.)

Perilli, Lorenzo,  Empedocle, Platone ed il clinamen epicureo, in: Museum criticum 25-8, 1990-3, p. 281-9 (B 35).

– La teoria del vortice nel pensiero antico: dalle origini a Lucretio, Pisa : Pacini 1996, p. 55-64 (B 35, B 115).

– Empedocle, in: La Filosofia antica: Itinerario storico e testuale, ed. Lorenzo Perilli - Daniela P. Taormina, Torino: Utet Università 2012, p. 129-138.

Perrot, M., Empédocle, in: Dictionnaire des philosophes 1, 1984, p. 841-6.

Pessanha, José Américo Motta, Empédocles e a democracia, thesis, Rio de Janeiro, 1965, in: Kleos, 7-8, 2003-2004, p. 109-182. http://www.pragma.kit.net/kleos/k7/k7-empedocles.pdf

Pesenti, Giovanni B., Un epigramma attribuito ad Empedocle e la version di F. Filelfo, in: Athenaeum 2 1914, p. 325-9 (B 161).

– Ancora dell’epigramma ps.-Empedocleo, in: Athenaeum 4 1916, p. 339-40 (B 161).

Petersen, Christian, Review of Brandis, Geschichte, in: Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung 97, 1837, col. 161-8.

Pettazzoni Raffaele, La religione nella Grecia antica fino ad Alessandro, Bologna: Nicola. Zanichelli 1921. (Empedocles: p. 192-194.)

Petrucci, Federico Maria, Teone di Smirne. Expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platonem utilium. Introduzione, traduzione, commento, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin 2012. (B 143.) 

Peyron, Amadeo Vittorio, Empedoclis et Parmenidis fragmenta ex codice Taurinensis Bibliothecae restituta et illustrata ab A. P. Simul agitur de genuino Graeco textu Commentarii Simplicii in Aristotelem De coelo et mundo, Leipzig 1810, p. 27-55. (In Google Books.)

Pfannmüller, Gustav, Tod, Jenseits und Unsterblichkeit in der Religion, Literatur und Philosophie der Griechen und Römer, München – Basel: E. Reinhardt Verlag 1953. (Pages 171-172: some interesting remarks on daimon: everybody is originally a daimon but in consequence of a pollution becomes a soul which is not composed of 4 roots and mixed with a body; and pages 184-188: translation of E. fragments and testimonies concerning soul and underworld.)

Pfligersdorffer, Georg, Studien zu Poseidonios, in: Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse 232/5, 1959, p. 100-31 = G. P., Itinera Salisburgensia: gesammelte Aufsätze zur Antike und ihrem Nachwirken, hrsg. von M. Glusl, Salzburg : Abakus 1999 (B 27, B 28, B 35.3-4 etc.).

– Ovidius Empedocleus. Zu Ovids Ianus-Deutung, in: Grazer Beiträge 1, 1973, p. 177-209 = G. P., Itinera Salisburgensia: gesammelte Aufsätze zur Antike und ihrem Nachwirken, hrsg. von M. Glusl, Salzburg : Abakus 1999  (the cosmogony in Fast. I.89-144 is allegedly Empedoclean one).

Piatek, J., Nietzsches Empedokles-Fragmente, Progr. Gymn. Stryj 1910.

Piazzi, Lisa, I motivi dell’ammirazione per Empedocle, pp. 42-46, in: Lucrezio e i Presocratici : un commento a De rerum natura 1, 635-920, Pisa : Scuola normale superiore, 2005. (Testi e commenti ; 1). 

– La conferma dell’integrazione tra etica e fisica nell’« Empedocle di Strasburgo », pp. 49-52, in: Lucrezio e i Presocratici : un commento a De rerum natura 1, 635-920, Pisa : Scuola normale superiore, 2005. (Testi e commenti ; 1.)   

Picot, Jean-Claude, À propos du: The Poem of Empedocles, de B. Inwood, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XIII(1), 1995, p. 81-104.

– Sur un emprunt d’Empédocle au “Bouclier” hésiodique, in: Revue des études grecques, 111, 1998(1), p. 42-60. (B 99, A 93, B 29.1, B 134.2.)

– L’Empédocle magique de P. Kingsley, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne XVIII(1), 2000, p. 25-86. (B 6, B 149, B 148, B 19, B 128.1-3.)

– Les cinq sources dont parle Empédocle, in: Revue des études grecques, 117, 2004(2), p. 393-446. (B 143, B 138, B 62.3, B 89, B 110.2, B 24, B 35.1, B 99, B 4.2, B 21.2, B 71; corrigenda in: REG 118/1, 2005, p. 322-5.) See the article http://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/les-cinq-sources-dont-parle-empedocle

– Aristote, Poétique 1457 b 13-14 : la métaphore d'espèce à espèce, in: Revue des études grecques 119, 2006(2), p. 532-551. (B 138, B 143.)

– Review of Carlos Megino Rodríguez, Orfeo y el orfismo en la poesía de Empédocles: influencias y paralelismos. Colección de Estudios, 98. Madrid:  Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM Ediciones), 2005, on line: Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2007.11.02.

– Empedocles, fragment 115.3:  Can one of the Blessed pollute his limbs with blood?, in: Reading ancient texts. Volume I: Presocratics and Plato - Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, edited by Suzanne Stern-Gillet and Kevin Corrigan, Leiden / Boston: Brill, 2007, (Brill’s studies in intellectual history, 161.), p. 41-56. (B 115.)

– La brillance de Nestis (Empédocle, fr. 96), in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXVI(1), 2008, pp. 75-100. (B 96, B6, B 111).

– Empédocle pouvait-il faire de la lune le séjour des Bienheureux ?, in: Organon (Warszawa), 37(40), 2008, pp. 9-37. (B 115 De exilio, B 146, B 147.) Online:

http://www.ihnpan.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/1picot.pdf

– Water and bronze in the hands of Empedocles' Muse, in: Organon, 41, 2009, pp. 59-84. (B 100, B 143.) http://www.ihnpan.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/8_picot-1.pdf

– Les dieux du fr. 128 et le mythe des races, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2012/3, p. 339-356. (B 128, B 115.)  http://www.cairn.info/resume.php?ID_ARTICLE=RMM_123_0339

– Sagesse face à Parole de Zeus : une nouvelle lecture du fr. 123.3 DK d’Empédocle, in: Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, XXX - 1, 2012, p. 23-57. (B 122, B 123, B 128.)

– L’image du πνιγεύς dans les Nuées. Un Empédocle au charbon, in: Comédie et Philosophie: Socrate et les "Présocratiques" dans les Nuées d'Aristophane, ed. A. Laks – R. Saetta Cottone, Paris: Editions Rue d'Ulm 2013, p. 113-129. (B 6, B 115, B 120, B 121.)

– Apollon et la φρὴν ἱερὴ καὶ ἀθέσφατος (Empédocle, fr. 134 DK), in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, vol. VI nº11, 2012, p. 1-31. On-line: http://www.afc.ifcs.ufrj.br/2012/Picot.pdf  . (B 6, B 29, B 47, B 84, B 133, B 134.)

– Un nom énigmatique de l'air chez Empédocle (fr. 21.4 DK), in: Les Etudes philosophiques, 2014, n°3, p. 343-373. (B 6, B 21, B 84, B 149.) 

http://www.cairn.info/mon_panier.php?ID_ARTICLE=LEPH_143_0343

Picot, Jean-Claude - Berg, William, Along a mountain path with Empedocles, in: Elenchos, XXXIII, 2012(1), p. 5-20. (B 24.)

– Empedocles vs Xenophanes: differing notions of the divine, in: Organon, 45, 2013, p. 5-19. (B 3, B 6, B 27, B 84, B 98, B 134.) http://www.ihnpan.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/1_picot-berg.pdf

– Cleombrotus cites Empedocles in Plutarch’s De defectu: a question of method in interpreting fr. 24 DK, in: Elenchos, XXXV, 2014(1), p. 127-148. (B 24.)  

– Lions and promoi: final phase of exile for Empedocles' daimones, in: Phronesis 60(4), 2015, p. 380-409. See the article (you can download) at the bottom of the page https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/Home

Pierris, Apostolos L. (ed.), The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005.

– ΟΜΟΙΟΝ ΟΜΟΙῼ and ΔΙΝΗ: Nature and Function of Love and Strife in the Empedoclean System, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 189-224. (B 91, B 22, B 17.18-20, B 35.3-5, Pap. Strasb. aII.10-9, B 21.9-14, B 134.).

– Reconstruction of Empedocles’ Poem, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. i-xcvi (Appendix).

– The Emergence of Reason from the Spirit of Mystery, Volume II: Mystery and Philosophy, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2007, p. 155-8, 173, 203-4. (B 6: Hera = earth.)

Pizzagalli, Angelo Maria, Il filosofo di Agrigente, in: Atene e Roma 20, 1917, p. 155-60 (superficial summary of Emp. teaching plus eulogies of E. Bignone’s study from 1916).

Platt, Arthur, Notes on Empedocles, in: The Journal of Philology 24, 1896, p. 246-7 (mostly redundant emendations B 9.3, B 21.13-4, B 100.8 a 25, B 112.9, B 125 and B 128).

Pokorný, Jindřich, Empedoklés z Akragantu. O podstatě světa. Očistná píseň [Empedocles of Acragas. On the substance of the world. The purgative song], Praha : Supraphon 1944 (general sketch of Emp. teaching plus the poetic translation of fragments and several testimonies).

Pohlenz, Max, Nomos und Physis, in: Hermes 81, 1953, p. 418-438, p. 426 (B 9.5). 

Polito, Roberto, Asclepiades of Bithynia and Heraclides Ponticus: medical Platonism?, in: Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC: New directions for philosophy, ed. M. Schofield, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, p. 118-138. (A1.61 On the woman whose breathing had stopped, A 43 On the smallest things.)

Pötscher, Walter, Die Bedeutung des Wortes ΓΛΑΥΚϹΠΙΣ, in: Philologus 141.1, 1997, p. 3-20. (B 42.) 

Portale, Elisa Chiara, Le nymphai e l'acqua in Sicilia: contesti rituali e morfologia dei votivi, in: Cultura e religione delle acque, ed. A. Calderone, Roma: Giorgio Bretschneider, 2012, p 169-191, plus Tav. XVI-XIX. (p. 186-187: B 6.)

Porter, James, The Origins of aesthetic thought in ancient Greece: matter, sensation, and experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010. (Empedocles: p. 152-164 mainly.)

Pozzoni, Ivan, L'aristocrazia moderata di Empedocle d'Agrigento, in: Per la filosofia, filosofia e insegnamento, XXIX, 84/1, 2012, p. 53-70.

– L’ontologia civica di Empedocle d’Agrigento, in: Información Filosófica, vol. IX, fasc.18, 2012, p. 18-44.

Powell, John Undershell, The Simile of the Clepsydra in Empedocles, in: Classical Quarterly 17, 1923, p. 172-4 (B 100).

Pralon, Didier, Review of D. O'Brien Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981, in: Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 62, 1988, p. 139-142.

Préaux, Claire, La lune dans la pensée grecque, Bruxelles : Palais des académies 1970. (Pages 50-52, 173-175, 183, 186-187. A 30, A 59, A 60, A, 61, A 62, B 42, B 43, B 45, B 46, B 62, B 65, B 67, B 100, B 109.)

Préaux, Jean-G., Un fragment retrouvé du De rerum natura de Varron, in: Homages à J. Bayet (Collection Latomus 70), Paris 1964, p. 587-98 (B 109).

Preus, Anthony, Historical Dictionary of Ancient Greek Philosophy, (Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements, No. 78), Lanham - Toronto – Plymouth: Scarecrow Press 2007.

Preller, Ludwig, Zur Kritik der Fragmente des Empedokles, in: Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft 18, 1837, col. 153-8 (analysis and emendation of B 2.1-2, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 40, B 96).

Prier, Raymond Adolph, Empedocles 17. 1-13. A suggested Reconstruction and Interpretation, in: Platon 28, 1976, p. 214-23.

– Archaic Logic: Symbol and Structure in Heraclitus, Parmenides, and Empedocles (De proprietatibus litterarum ser. pract. XI.), The Hague - Paris : Mouton 1976, p. 120-48.

Primavesi, Oliver, Zur Geschichte des Deutschen Papyruskartells, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 114, 1996, p. 173-187.

– Der Strassburger Empedoklespapyrus, in: Der Neue Pauly, herausgegeben von H. Cancik und H. Schneider, Stuttgart-Weimar 1997, Band III, p. 1015.

– Empedoklesstudien: Ein unveröffentlichter Papyrus und die indirekte Überlieferung, Habilitationsschrift, Frankfurt 1997.

– Editing Empedocles. Some longstanding Problems Reconsidered in the Light of the Strasburg Papyrus, in: Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte in der Antike. Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi. Atti del Seminario internazionale Ascona, Centro Stefano Franscini, 22-27 Settembre 1996, hrsg. von W. Burkert, L. Gemelli Marciano, E. Matelli, L. Orelli (Aporemata, 3), Göttingen 1998, p. 62-88.

– Neues zur aristotelischen Vorsokratiker-Doxographie, in: Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption 8, 1998, s. 25-41 (Pap. Strasb. aI.6-aII.3 versus Arist. Met. 1000 a 18 - b 19).

– Empedocle: il problema del ciclo cosmico e il Papiro di Strasburgo, in: Elenchos 19/2, 1998, p. 241-88. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997, p. 217-411.)

–  Empedokles von Akragas, in: Große Gestalten der griechischen Antike, ed. K. Brodersen, München: 1999, p. 216–223.

– La Daimonologia della fisica empedoclea, in: Aevum Antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 3-68. (Scholia, B 115.)

– Lecteurs antiques et byzantins d’Empédocle. De Zénon à Tzétzès, in: Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed. by A. Laks - C. Louguet, Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 183-204.

– Die Häuser von Zeus und Hades: zu Text und Deutung von Empedokles B 142 D.-K, in: Cronache Ercolanesi 33, 2003, p. 53-68.

– The Structure of Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle: Aristotle and the Byzantine Anonymous, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 245-65.

– Theologische Allegorie: Zur philosophischen Funktion einer poetischen Form bei Parmenides und Empedokles, in: Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt, ed. Marietta Horster - Christiane Reitz, Palingenesia Band 85, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2005, p. 69-93. (B 6, B 21.9-12, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 115, B 134.)

– Empedokles in Florentiner Aristoteles-Scholien, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 157, 2006, p. 27-40.

– Die Suda über die Werke des Empedokles, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 158, 2006, p. 61-75.

– Apollo and Other Gods in Empedocles, in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici / The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa : Edizioni della Normale 2006, p. 51-77. (B 1152, B 1151, B 134.)

– Teologia fisica, mitica e civile in Empedocle, in: Empedocle : tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, (Skepsis, 19), p. 30-47. (Scholia, B 35, B 21.12, B 6, B 115, B 147, fr. 9 Hunger, B 142, B 139.)

– Zur Überlieferung und Bedeutung des Empedokleischen Titels ”Καθαρμοί”, in: Katharsiskonzeptionen vor Aristoteles. Zum kulturellen Hintergrund des Tragödiensatzes. Herausgegeben von M. Vöhler und B. Seidensticker, Berlin / New York : 2007, p. 183-225.

– Empédocle : divinité physique et mythe allégorique, in: Philosophie antique 7, 2007, p. 51-89. (Scholia, A 72, B 6, B 21, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 59, B 115, B 134, B 142, B 147, a(ii) 2.)

– Empedocles: physical and mythical divinity , p. 250-283 (Chapter 8), in: The Oxford Handbook to Presocratic Philosophy, ed. P. Curd - D. W. Graham, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008. (Translation into English of the previous title in French, but with a change of interpretation of B 59 – Scholia, A 72, B 6, B 21, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 59, B 115, B 134, B 142, B 147, a(ii) 2.). That contribution can be read in full on: 

http://books.google.fr/books?id=14muxtEiBG0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Handbook+presocratic&lr=&ei=0hXwS9OvM4ruzQTft9jSCg&cd=1#v=onepage&q&f=false    . Or:

 https://umdrive.memphis.edu/troche/public/Philosophy%204211-6211,%20Presocratics/Primavesi,%20Empedocles,%20Physical%20and%20Mythical%20Divinity.pdf

– Empedokles Physika I : Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs, Berlin - New York: Walter de Gruyter 2008, (Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete, 22). (B 17, a(i), a (ii), c, B 20, B 21, B 76, b, B 23, B 26, B 35, B 27a, B 28, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 31, d, B 139, f - Intermezzo: B 115, B 59.) See review by R. Janko, 2010.

– Medicine Between Natural Philosophy and Physician’s Practice: A Debate Around 400 BC, in: Quo Vadis Medical Healing: Past Concepts and New Approaches, (= International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 44), ed. S. Elm - St. N. Willich, Springer Science + Business Media B. V. 2009, p. 29–40. (Empedocles as a Doctor: p. 30-32. Empedocles' Physics: p. 32-34. Empedocles' Theory of the Elements as a Medical Axiom in Philistion: p. 34-35.)

– Aristoteles oder Empedokles? Charles Darwin und Eduard Zeller über einen antiken Ansatz zur Evolutionstheorie, p 25–65, in: Eduard Zeller. Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert, Gerald Hartung (ed.), Berlin / New York, Walter de Gruyter, 2010. http://www.leibniz-publik.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb00086286_00001.html

– Zu Brechts Empedokles, in: Der Philosoph Bertolt Brecht, ed. M. Mayer, Würzburg: 2011, p. 25-37.

– 7. Kapitel: Empedokles, in: Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch / Deutsch, ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert von J. Mansfeld und O. Primavesi, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 2011, (Reclam Bibliothek, Hard cover, Bd. 10730), p. 392-563. Reprint with minor addenda and corrigenda in 2012, Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, Bd. 18971.

– Empedokleisches im Tod des Empedokles: Ein neuentdeckter Text des Vorsokratikers und Hölderlins Trauerspiel, in: Hölderlin in der Moderne. Kolloquium für Dieter Henrich zum 85. Geburtstag, hrsg. von Friedrich Vollhardt, Berlin 2014, 13–41.

– § 13: Empedokles, in: Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, I, Frühgriechische Philosophie, ed. D. Bremer - H. Flashar - G. Rechenauer, Basel: Schwabe 2013, p. 667-739. (Short review by J. Mansfeld in Mnemosyne 68, 2015, p. 331-343, at p. 340-341.) 

– Empedokleisches im Tod des Empedokles: Ein neuentdeckter Text des Vorsokratikers und Hölderlins Trauerspiel, in: Hölderlin in der Moderne. Kolloquium für Dieter Henrich zum 85. Geburtstag, ed. von Friedrich Vollhardt, Berlin 2014, p. .13–41.

– Die Zerstörungskraft der göttlichen Liebe: Empedokles im XII. Gesang von Dantes Inferno, in: Deutsches Dante-Jahrbuch, 90, 2015, p. 36-74. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/dante.2015.90.issue-1/issue-files/dante.2015.90.issue-1.xml

– Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle and the Pythagorean Tetractys, in: Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 5-29. On-line:  http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1/issue-files/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1.xml

Primavesi, Oliver, - Patzer, Andreas, Die übertiefe Tiefe (Empedokles B 35, 3-5 und “Physika” I, 288-290, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 135, 2001, p. 1-10.

Primavesi, Oliver - Alpers, Klaus, Empedokles im Wiener Herodian-Palimpsest, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 156, 2006, p. 27-37 (a new edition of B 153b).

– Lecteurs antiques et byzantins d’Empédocle de Zénon à Tzétzès, in: Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique?, ed. A. Laks - C. Louguet, Lille 2002, p. 183-204.

Przyluski, Jean, Les mages et les Medes, in: Revue de l’histoire des religions 121, 1940, p. 128-140 (A 146).

– Les sept puissances divines en Grèce, in: Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses 18, 1938, p. 255-62 (a sketch of Emp. cosmology and its comparison with alleged Zoroastrian pattern).

Puglia, Enzo, Demetrio Lacone e Empedocle, in: Atti del XVII Congresso internazionale di papirologia (Napoli 19-26 Maggio 1983), Napoli 1984, II.437-46 (B 100.1-2, B 142).

Palumbo, Lidia, Empedocle e il linguaggio poetico, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 83-107. (B2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 20, B 23, B 99, B111, B 129, B 132.)

–  Poesia e filosofia in Empedocle di Agrigento, in: Il pensiero politico meridionale, Atti del Convegno “Il pensiero politico meridionale” Avellino 1-2 dicembre 2006, a cura di Giuliano Minichiello e Clementina Gily, Avellino, Elio Sellino Editore (Edizioni del Centro Dorso) 2008, p. 131-146.

Lasserre, François, Trois nouvelles citations poétiques, in: Museum Helveticum 26, 1969, p. 80-3 (chap. 1: Deux vers inédits d’Empédocle = B 152 Wright = B 153b Vítek).

Last, Hugh, Empedokles and His Klepsydra Again, in: Classical Quarterly 18, 1924, p. 169-73. (B 100.)

Laurenti, Renato, Bellezza e piacere nell’opera di Empedocle, in: Studi filosofici 6, 1993, p. 7-26.

– La componente aritmo-geometrica nella teologia di Empedocle, in: Il dibattito su Parmenide. Aspetti della filosofia tra V e IV secolo, Atti del convegno, Macerata-Perugia, 24-26 marzo 1994 (in 1999 forthcoming).

– Le Proème à Apollon d’Empédocle dans les fragments d’Aristote, in: L’Aristote perdu, Atti del Convegno organizzato dal Collegium Academicum Universale philosophiae (Atene) - Centro Internazionale di Filosofia Greca “Antonio Jannone” (Atene-Roma), ed. A. Jannone et alii, Roma: Atene, 1995, p. 103-119. (B 134, B 142)

– Empedocle, Napoli : M. D’Auria editore 1999.

– Bellezza e piacere nell'opera di Empedocle, pp. 3-25, in: Scritti vari da Omero ad Arnobio. Napoli : Liguori. 2007. (Quaderni del Dipartimento di filosofia e politica, Università degli studi di Napoli L'Orientale; 32.)

Lazzeri, Massimo, Un verso di Empedocle frg. 10 Diels, in: Bollettino dei classici 3a ser. I, 1980, p. 25-8. 

Lebano, A., La sfera armillare di Empedocle, Napoli 1859.

Lebedev, A. V., Orpheus, Parmenides or Empedocles? The Aphrodite verses in the Naasene treatise of Hippolytos' s Elenchos, in: Philologus 138(1), 1994, p. 24-31 (B 66, B 98, B 153, B 154d).

Leclerc, Jean (Clericus Ioannes), Bibliothèque choisie pour servir de suite à la bibliothèque universelle, année MDCCIII [1713], Tome I, seconde édition, Amsterdam, chez Henri Schelte, 1712 [16911], p. 78-83 (a reasonable criticism of 3 Aristotle’s theses on Emp.: 1) cognition is perception; 2) soul is composed of 4 roots; 3) the first creatures were engendered by chance) and p. 103-7 (some remarks on B 8, B 11, B 15, heavily influenced by Cudworth).

Lefèvre, Eckard, E di un poeta siciliano il Prometheus desmotus, in: Orpheus 8, 1987, p. 1-13 (údajné Aischylovo drama napsal autor, který byl znalcem Empedoklea).

Le Fèvre, Tanneguy, Les Poètes grecs I, Saumur : D. de Lerpinière et J. Lesnier 1664 = J. Gronovius, Thesaurus Graecarum antiquitatum, Tomus X, Vitae Poetarum gracorum: Ubi de eorumdem patria, moribus, scriptis, etc. perspicue ac compendiose disseritur, ex Gallico idiomate in Latinum translatae, Lugduni Batavorum : apud Petrum van der Aa 1701, p. 740-96 (Emp.: p. 769-70).

Legrand, Gérard, La Pensée des Présocratiques, Paris : Bordas 1970, p. 139-51 (very general and superficial sketch of Emp. teaching).

Leone, Giuliana, Epicuro ed Empedocle, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, pp. 221-240.

Lenoir, Raymond, La doctrine des quatre éléments et la philosophie ionienne, in: Revue des études grecques 40, 1927, p. 17-50.

Leonard, William Ellery, The Fragments of Empedocles, in: The Monist 17,  n°3, 1907, p. 451-74.

– Empedocles; the man, the philosopher, the poet, in: The Monist 17,  n°4, 1907, p. 560-569.

– The Fragments of Empedocles Translated into English Verse, Chicago 1908 (La Salle, Illinois 19732).

Lesher, James H., Early Interest in Knowledge, in: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. by A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, s. 225-49 (Emp.: p. 241-5).

Lesky, Erna, Die Zeugungs- und Verebungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken, in: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse 19, 1950, p. 1255-62.

Lesky, Albin, Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, Bern 1971, p. 249-52.

Lieberg, Godo, Il ruolo del piacere nella filosofia di Empedocle, in: Sophia 26, 1958, p. 221-225 (A 86, par. 9).

Lietard, G. A., Empédocle considéré comme philosophe et comme médecin, [Paris?] 1888 (19 p.; a biography of E.).

Lincoln, Bruce, Myth, Cosmos, and Society. Indo-European Themes of Creation and Destruction, Cambridge 1986, p. 35-45 (Emp. sphairos and cosmic cycle as an Indo-European mythological theme).

– Theorizing Myth, Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship, Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press 1999, p. 31-32, 156-159. (B 3, B 23, B 114, B 117, B 131, B 146.)

Lioy, Paolo, Un filosofo di duemila anni fa’, in: Rivista Sicula di Scienze, Letterature ed Arti 3/6, 1871, p. 5-19. (Reprinted in Conferenze scientifiche, Torino, Unione Tipografico-Editrice, 1872.)

Lisi, Francisco, La relación entre la cosmología de Empédocles y la física de Platón a la luz de los nuevos descubrimientos papirológicos, in: Εὔνοια. Estudios de filosofía antigua. Un homenaje a María Isabel Santa Cruz, ed. Correa Motta, A. – Zamora Calvo, J.M., Bogotá (Universidad Nacional de Colombia): Primera 2009, p. 327-347.

Lloyd, Alfred H., A Study in the Logic of the Early Greek Philosophy: Pluralism, Empedocles and Democritus, in: Philosophical Review 10, 1901, p. 261-70 (general and quite ahistorical account of the alleged inner logic of Emp. system).

– The Coin Types of Selinus and the Legend of Empedocles, in: Numismatic Chronicle 15, 1935, p. 73-93 (A 1, par. 70).

Lloyd, Geoffrey Ernest Richard, The Hot and the Cold, the Dry and the Wet in Greek Philosophy, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 84, 1964, p. 92-106. (B 21). Reprint in Methods and Problems 1991. 

– Right and Left in Greek Philosophy, in: The Journal of Hellenic Studies 82, 1962, p. 56-66. Reprint in Methods and Problems 1991. 

– Who is attacked in On Ancient Medicine?, in: Phronesis 8, 1963, p. 108-126. (A 71.) Reprint in Methods and Problems 1991. 

– Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge 1966 (19872, 19923).

– Demystifying mentalities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990. (About metaphors: p. 21-25.) 

– Methods and Problems in Greek Science: Selected Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 (19932)

– Review of B. Inwood, Brad Inwood (ed., tr.): The Poem of Empedocles, in: The Classical Review 43.1, 1993, p. 164.

– Αρχαία ελληνική επιστήμη. Από τον Θαλή ώς τον Αριστοτέλη, μτφρ. Π. Καρλέτσα, Ηράκλειο : Πανεπιστημιακές εκδόσεις Κρήτης, 2005. Pp. 46-53 (Εμπεδοκλής).

Lobeck, Christian August, Phrynichi Eclogae nominum et verborum Atticorum cum notis P. J. Nunnesii, D. Hoeschelii, J. Scaligeri et Cornelii de Pauw edidit, explicuit Ch. A. L., In libraria Weidmannia, Lipsiae 1820, p. 609 (B 125: ἀλλογνῶτι) and 732 (B 115.4: ἁμαρτήσας).

– Aglaophamus sive de theologiae mysticae graecorum causis I-II, Regimontii 1829.

– Pathologiae sermonis Graeci, Lipsiae 1843 (some emendations: B 19, B 78, B 100.23).

– Ῥηματικόν sive verborum Graecorum et nominum verbalium technologia, Sumtu Fratrum Borntraeger, Regimontii 1846, p. 201 and 355, n. 6 (the emendations of B 90.2 and B 137.2-3).

Loeffler, Annette, Ancrage énonciatif, mise en discours et pragmatique - Cosmos et situation de communication dans les fragments d’Empédocle, in: Sémiotiques, 10, juin 1996, p. 123-136. 

http://www.revue-texto.net/Parutions/Semiotiques/SEM_n10_8.pdf 

Loew, Emanuel, Empedokles, Anaxagoras und Demokrit, in: Wiener Studien 55, 1937, p. 33-48 (B 2, B 3, B 106, B 108, B 110, B 17, B 21).

Lommatzsch, Bernhard Heinrich Carl, Die Weisheit des Empedokles nach ihren Quellen [...], Berlin: G. Reimer 1830 (speculative account of the principal Empedoclean theses plus the translation of fragments).

Lombardo, Stanley, Parmenides and Empedocles. The Fragments in Verse Translation, San Francisco 1982.

Long, Anthony A., Thinking and sense-perception in Empedocles: mysticism or materialism?, in: Classical Quarterly 16, 1966, p. 256-76.

– Review of D. O’Brien, ECC, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 90, 1970, p. 238-9 (unimportant).

– Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the Sixties, in: The Pre-Socratics, ed. A. P. D. Mourelatos, New York 19932 (19741), p. 397-425.

Long, Herbert S., A Study of the Doctrine of Metempsychosis in Greece from Pythagoras to Plato (diss.), Princeton 1948 (19421).

– The Unity of Empedocles’ Thought, in: American Journal of Philology 70, 1949, p. 142-58.

Longo, Angela, Empedocle e l'allegoria nella Confutazione di tutte le eresie attribuita a Ippolito di Roma, in: Des évêques, des écoles et des hérétiques. Actes du colloque international sur la Réfutation de toutes les hérésies, Genève, 13-14 juin 2008, ed. G. Aragione - E. Norelli, Lausanne: Éditions du Zèbre 2011, p. 119-133.

Longo, Oddone, Simbiogenesi Empedoclea, in: Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica 1999, p. 129-52 (B 57 - B 62, B 97 etc.).

Longrigg, James, Galen on Empedocles (fragment 67), in: Philologus 108, 1964, p. 297-300. (B 67.)

– Empedocles’s fiery fish, in: Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, vol. 28, 1965, p. 314-5. (Respiration, heat, vital heat, cooling water, A 73.)

– Κρυσταλλοειδῶς, in: Classical Quarterly, vol. 15, n°2, 1965, p. 249-51. (Empedocles' similes, vault of the outer heaven, salt, A 30, A 51, A 54, A 66, B 56.)      

– Roots, in: The Classical Review, vol. 17, n° 1, 1967, p. 1-4. (Elements, particles, mixture, sun, fire, Sphaîros, A 41, A 43, B 27.)

– Ice of Bronze (Lucretius I.493), in: The Classical Review 20, 1970, p. 8-9. (Metaphors, similes, fire in a solidifying role, A 69.)

– Zeno’s Cosmology, in: The Classical Review 22, 1972, p. 170-1.

– Empedocles’ Fertile Fish (B 74), in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 94, 1974, p. 173-4. (B 74.)

– Empedocles, Juno, and De Natura Deorum ii. 66, in: The Classical Review 24, 1974, p. 173. (B 6.)

– Two Notes on Theophrastus De sensibus, in: Philologus 119, 1975, p. 163-9. (A 86, par. 1 a 9.).

– The “Roots of All Things”, in: Isis 67, 1976, p. 420-38. (B 6.)

– A seminal 'debate' in the fifth century B.C.?, in: Aristotle on nature and living things: Philosophical and Historical Studies presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday, ed. A. Gotthelf, Pittsburgh - Bristol: Mathesis publications, Bristol Classical Press 1985, p. 277-287. (A 68, A 77, A 78, A 79, A 82, A 84, B 68, B 70, B 92, B 98, B 105, B 150.) 

– Presocratic Philosophy and Hippocratic Medicine, in: History of Science, 27, 1, 1989, p. 1-39. (A 74, B 6, B 21, B 23, B 111.) 

– Empedocles and the plague of Selinus: a cock and bull story?, in: Tria Lustra: A Festschrift in Honour of John Pinsent, ed. H.D.Jocelyn - H. Hurt, Liverpool, Liverpool Classical Monthly, 1993, p. 37-42.

– Greek rational medicine: philosophy and medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians, Routledge, London 1993. (A 77, A 78, A 79, A 85, A 86, B 6, B 21, B 65, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 105, B 111.)

Lonie, Ian M., Medical Theory in Heraclides of Pontus, in: Mnemosyne 4/18, 1965, p. 126-143 (A 1, par. 60-1, ad B 1152).

– On the Botanical Excursus in De natura pueri, in: Hermes 97, 1969, p. 391-411.

López Eire, A., Sobre los orígines de la oratoria I, in: Minerva 1, 1987, p. 13-31.

Lo Presti, Roberto, Empedocle su percezione e cognizione, pp. 30-39, in: In forma di senso : l'encefalocentrismo del trattato ippocratico Sulla malattia sacra nel suo contesto epistemologico. Roma : Carocci. 2008. (Studi e ricerche. Sezione greca / Aglaia, Dipartimento di studi greci, latini e musicali, Università di Palermo; 10.)

Lortzing, Franz, Bericht über die griechischen Philosophen vor Sokrates für die Jahre 1876-1897: Empedokles. 1. Zur Kritik uud Erklärung der Fragmente. 2. Zur Lehre und zum Leben des Empedokles, in: Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, 116, 1904, p. 31-60. (Reinach, Diels, Blass, Bergk, Knatz, Gomperz, Platt, Ward, Radloff, Wieck.)

– Review of C. E. Millerd, Empedocles, in: Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 31/22, 1911, col. 665-73.

Lorusso, AM., Dal semplice al complesso : valenza strutturale e didattica della tecnica dell'eco in Empedocle, in: Quaderni del Dipartimento di filologia linguistica e tradizione classica Augusto Rostagni, N.S. 4, 2005 Bologna Pàtron, 2006, p. 109-124.

Lovejoy, Arthur O., The Meaning of Φυσις in the Greek Physiologers, in: The philosophical Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1909, p. 369-383. (B 8, B 17, B 63, B 110.)

Luchte, James, Early Greek thought: before the dawn, London - New York: Continuum 2011. 

Luciani, Sabine, Philosophie et esthétique du mouvement dans le “De rerum natura”, in: Présence de Lucrèce: Actes du colloque tenu à Tours 3-5 Décembre 1998, ed. Rémy Poignault, Université de Tours 1999, p. 65-76 (a comparison of Lucretius with Democritus and Emp.).

Ludwich, Arthur, Aristarchs homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos, II, Leipzig: Teubner 1885. (P. 308-311 and 321-322. Useful for a count of 455 verses with spondees [S] and/or dactyls [D], and a comparaison with Homer, Hesiod and other authors writing in hexameters.)

Lüth, Johann Christoph, Die Struktur des Wirklichen im empedokleischen System “Über die Natur”, Meisenheim am Glan : Hain 1970.

MMM

Maass, Ernst, Orpheus. Untersuchungen zur griechischen römischen altchristlichen Jenseitsdichtung und Religion, München 1895, p. 270 (B 115.1-2), 113, n. 150 (B 121.3) etc.

Maas, Paul, Zu Abdankungsgedicht des Nikolaos Muzalon: I. Literarisches, in: Byzantinische Zeitschrift 35, 1935, p. 2-7 (B 121.2 and 4).

– in: Byzantinische Zeitschrift 36, 1936, p. 456-7 (B 143).

– Greek Metre, Oxford 1962.

Macauley, David Mark, Be-wildering Order: Toward an Ecology of the Elements in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Beyond (diss.), State University of New York - Stony Brook 1998. 

– The Flowering of Environmental Roots and the Four Elements in Presocratic Philosophy: From Empedocles to Deleuze and Guattari, in: World Views: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, Volume 9, Number 3, 2005, p. 281-314. (B 6).

– Elemental Philosophy: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water as Environmental Ideas, Albany (NY): SUNY Press, 2010. (P. 103-136: The Flowering of Ecological Roots: Empedocles elemental thought. See on-line: Gruen, Lori (2012) "Review of "Elemental Philosophy: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water as Environmental Ideas",in: Essays in Philosophy: Vol. 13: Iss. 1, Article 22: http://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1421&context=eip - B 6.)

Mace, Sarah T., The Strasbourg Empedocles, in: Classical World 95, 2002, p. 195-7 (review of M-P, 1999).

Macris, Constantinos, Pythagore, un maître de sagesse charismatique de la fin de la période archaïque, in: Carisma profetico. Fattore di innovazione religiosa, ed. Giovanni Filoramo, Brescia 2003, p. 249-289 (pp. 255-7: B 129).

Macris, Constantinos - Skarsouli, Pénélope, La sagesse et les pouvoirs du mystérieux τις du fragment 129 d’Empédocle, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2012/3, p. 357-377. (B 129) - http://www.cairn.info/resume.php?ID_ARTICLE=RMM_123_0357

Madvig, Johan Nicolas, Adversaria critica ad scriptores graecos et latinos I: De arte conjecturali. Emendationes graecae, Hauniae : Sumptibus Librariae Gyldendalianae (F. Hegel), 1871, p. 656 (B 5).

Maggi, Paolo, La “Clessidra” di Empedocle ed un vasetto della Ca’ Morta, in: Rivista archeologica dell’antica provincia e diocesi di como 170, 1988, p. 5-10 (B 100.9).

Maignanus, Emanuel, Cursus philosophicus, Tolosae 1652 (I assume an uncompleted reference from Sturz, 1805, s. iii, as I was not able to find this book).

Malengreau, P., De la pensée d’Empédocle à la mythologie freudienne, in: Revue de psychologie et des sciences de l’éducation 6, 1971, p. 330-54.

Manetti, D[aniela?], Valore semantico e risonanze culturali della parola fύsij, in: La Parola del Passato 41, 1973, p. 426-44 (A 732).

Mansfeld, Jaap, Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt, Assen 1964.

– Heraclitus on the Psychology and Physiology of Sleep and on Rivers, in: Mnemosyne 20, 1967, p. 1-29 (p. 23: B 105)

– Ambiguity in Empedocles B 17.3-5, in: Phronesis 17, 1972, p. 17-39.

– Bad World and Demiurge: A ‘Gnostic’ Motif from Parmenides and Empedocles to Lucretius and Philo, in: Studies in Gnosticism and Hellenistic Religions presented to Gilles Quispel on the Occasion of his 65-th Birthday, ed. R. van der Broek - M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden 1981, p. 261-314 (Emp.: p. 278-90).

– Die Vorsokratiker II: Zenon, Empedokles, Anaxagoras, Demokrit. Griechisch/Deutsch. Auswähl der Fragmente, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 1986 (Universal-Bibliothek, Nr. 7966). 7. Kapitel Empedokles, p. 56-155.

– Heraclitus, Empedocles, and Others in a Middle Platonist Cento in Philo of Alexandria, in: Vigiliae Christianae 39, 1985, p. 131-155 (B 115, B 16, B 117, B 121).

– Heresiography in Contexts: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy, Leyden - New York - Cologne : Brill 1992 (B 6, B 16, B 30, B 21, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119).

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. Part 2: Les Origines, in: Mnemosyne 31, 1978, p. 207-9.

– A Lost Manuscript of Empedocles’ Katharmoi, in: Mnemosyne 4/47, 1994, p. 79-82.

– Insight by Hindsight. Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems, in: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 40, 1995, p. 225-32 (p. 227: B 6).

– Critical Note: Empedocles and his ιnterpreters, in: Phronesis 40, 1995, p. 109-115 (a refutation of P. Kingsley’s article in: Phronesis 39, 1994, p. 235-54; A 33, B 6). Reprinted with light modifications in Critical note: Empedocles and his interpreters, in: Mansfeld J., Runia D.T. Aëtiana : vol. III, studies in the doxographical traditions of ancient philosophy, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2010, (Philosophia antiqua, vol. 118), p. 333-340.

– Aristote et la structure du De sensibus de Théophraste, in: Phronesis 41/2, 1996, s. 158-88 (mainly for Empedocles: p. 161-3 and 175-7; B 106, B 108, B 63, B 109, B 107, B 105, A 86).

– Parménide et Héraclite avaient-ils une théorie de la perception?, in: Phronesis 44/4, 1999, p. 326-46 (mainly for Empedocles: p. 334-5, 344).

– Aristotle on Anaxagoras in relation to Empedocles in Metaphysics A, in: Philologus, 155/2, 2011, p. 361-366.

Mansfeld, Jaap - Algra, Keimpe, Interpretative Thêtas in the Strasbourg Empedocles, pp. 317-328, in: Empsychoi logoi – Religious innovations in Antiquity: Studies in honour of Pieter Willem van der Horst, ed. Houtman A. - De Jong A. and Misset-van de Weg M., Leiden - Boston: Brill 2008.

Mansfeld Jaap - Primavesi Oliver, Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch / Deutsch, ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert von J. Mansfeld und O. Primavesi, Philipp Reclam jun., Stuttgart 2011.

Manso, Johann Caspar Friedrich, Der Traum des Empedokles [oder] über die Erkennbarkeit der Natur (Somnium Empedoclis), in: Erscheinungen und Traüme, übersetzt und herausgegeben von Georg Schatz, Band II, Leipzig 1791 (= J. C. F. Manso, Vermischte Schriften, Leipzig : Dyk 1801, II.160-173).

Manuli, Paola – Vegetti, Mario, Cuore, sangue e cervello. Biologia e antropologia nel pensiero antico, Episteme, Milano 1977 (being reprinted by Petite Plaisance, Pistoia, 2009?). Pp. 55-71.

Marcinkowska-Rosół, Maria, Diogenes Laertios: Epigramy o Empedoklesie (VIII 75), in: Meander 1-4, 2008.

– Empedocles B 105 and the definition of human mind, in: Eranos 105, 2008-2009, p. 118-123. (B 105.)

Marcovich, Miroslav, Heraclitus, Mérida 1967. 

Marin, Mauritio, Empedocle, il Pitagorico di Afrodite, in: Salesianum 60, 1998, p. 65-80.

Marioti, I., Tradurre i poeti greci, in: La traduzione dei classici greci e latini in Italia oggi: problemi, prospettive, iniziative editoriali, a cura di P. Ianni - I. Mazzini, Macerata 1992, p. 87-98.

Markovic, Daniel, Vergil’s Empedoclean Universe, in: Lucida intervalla 43, 2014, p 67-90. (B 128.) http://emu.f.bg.ac.rs/lucidaintervalla/issues/43(2014).pdf

Marmodoro, Anna, Empedocles's metaphysics, in: Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 1-4. On-line:  http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1/issue-files/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1.xml

Marshall, Hallie, Rebecca, Plutarch as a source for Empedocles, Thesis for the degree of Master of Arts, Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada), 2002.

Marsoner, Agostino, Sul fr. 128 di Empedocle, in: Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell’ Università di Napoli 15, n. s. III, 1972-3, p. 5-10. (B 128.)

– A proposito di una recente edizione di Empedocle, in: Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofie dell’ Università di Napoli 17, 1974-5, p. 43-8.

– Studi Empedoclei, in: La Parola del Passato 38/209, 1983, p. 150-60.

– Forma et pensiero nella filosofia greca arcaica, Galatina : Congedo 1992, p. 117-146 (chap. VI: B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 26, B 30, B 35, B 131, B 133, B 134).

Martano, Giuseppe, Bagliori della chimica moderna in Empedocle d’ Agrigento, in: Kokalos 9, 1963, p. 3-18. Reprinted in Martano, G., Studi di storia del pensiero antico, Napoli-Firenze, 1968, pp. 53-81.

– Il senso del concreto nei contributi sicelioti alla storia del pensiero greco, in: Kokalos 14-5, 1968-9, p. 280-94.

– Suggestioni Empedoclee nella poesia di Hölderlin, in Discorsi 2/2, 1982, p. 197-211.

– Physis, arete, dike nella cultura greca dell’età arcaica, in: Elenchos 8, 1987, p. 25-41 (A 732).

Martin, Alain, Un papyrus inédit d’Empédocle dans la collection de Strasbourg, in: Gnomon 67, 1995, p. 734-5.

– D’Achmîm à Strasbourg, sur les traces d’Empédocle, in: Bulletin de la classe des lettres de l’Académie royale de belgique 6/8, 1997, p. 121-37.

– L’Empedocle di Strasburgo: aspetti papirologici, in: Elenchos 19/2, 1998, p. 65-80. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997, p. 217-411.)

– Le papyrus de Strasbourg, in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, III, ed. R. Goulet, Paris : C.N.R.S.-Éditions 2000, s. v. Empédocle, p. 68-72.

– Empédocle, Fr. 142 D.-K. Nouveau regard sur un papyrus d’Herculanum, in: Cronache Ercolanesi 33, 2003, p. 43-52.

– Empedocle poeta. Alcune considerazioni sul fr. B 152 DK, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, pp. 15-29. 

Martin, Alain - Primavesi, Oliver, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg: (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666) Introduction, édition et commentaire, with an English summary, Strasbourg - Berlin - New York: Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg - W. de Gruyter 1999.

Martin, Hubert, Jr., Plutarch’s Citation of Empedocles at Amatorius 756 D, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10, 1969, p. 57-70. (B 17.)

Martin, Thomas-Henri, Mémoire sur les hypothèses astronomiques des plus anciens philosophes de la Grèce étrangers à la notion de la sphéricité de la terre, in: Mémoires de l'Institut national de France, Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 29, 2ème partie, 1879, p. 29-252 (Emp.: p. 211-35).

Martínez Nieto, Roxana, Beatriz, Particularidades morfológico-semánticas del léxico de Empédocles, in: Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, ed. Inés Olza Moreno - Manuel Casado Velarde - Ramón González Ruiz, Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2008, p. 561-566.  (B 5, B 12, 24, B 25, B 35, B 49, B 51, B 56, B 61, B 122, B 129, B 134, B 148.)     http://dspace.unav.es/dspace/bitstream/10171/21069/1/Particularidades%20morfol%C3%B3gico%20sem%C3%A1nticas%20del%20l%C3%A9xico.pdf

Mastrofili, M., Il sistema fisiologico di Empedocle di Agrigento, Napoli : Giannini 1914.

Matsumoto, A., A Study on the Fragments of Gorgias, in: The Hiroshima University Studies 26, 1966, p. 29-50.

Mauduit, Christine, Les miracles d’Empédocle ou la naissance d'un thaumaturge, in: Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé 4, 1998 (février 1999), p. 289-309 (B 111).

Mauduit, Christine & Saetta Cottone, Rossella, Voir ou entendre : faut-il choisir ? Une analyse de la réception théâtrale dans le prologue des Thesmophories, in: Cahiers des études anciennes, 51, 2014, p. 45-73. (Empedocles: p. 61- 68; A 56, B 84,)  http://etudesanciennes.revues.org/789

McClelland, Norman C., Encyclopedia of reincarnation and karma, Jefferson - London: McFarland & Company 2010. (P. 87: Empedocles.)

McDiarmid, John B., Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes, in: Harvard Studies in Classical Philology  61, 1953, p. 85-156 (Emp.: p. 106-9).

McEvilley, Thomas, The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophy, New York: Allworth Press 2002. (Emp.: p. 67-71 :  Emp. cosmic cycle; p. 106-7: Emp. and Orphism, p. 304-7: Emp. and elements).

McGonagill, Gary Lance, A history of allegorical interpretation from Homer through Lucretius, Thesis in classical philosophy, Harvard University (Cambridge Ma.), 2001. (Empedocles: p. 69-78. A patchwork of several selected readings. Influenced by Kingsley.)

McIntosh Snyder, Jane, Lucretius' Empedoclean Sicily, in: The Classical World, 65, 7, 1972, p. 217-218.

McKirahan, Richard D., Jr., Philosophy before Socrates: an Introduction with Texts and Commentary, Hackett : Indianapolis - Cambridge 1994, p. 232-91 (fragments and commentaries).

– Assertion and Argument in Empedocles’ Cosmology or, what did Empedocles learn from Parmenides?, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 163-89 (B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17.30-3).

– Philosophy before Socrates: an introduction with texts and commentary, (Second Edition), Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company, 2010, (Empedocles: p. 230-292).

Megino Rodríguez, Carlos, Orfeo y el Orfismo en la poesía de Empédocles: influencias y paralelismos, Colección de Estudios, Madrid : UAM Ediciones 2005 (104 p.). See review by J.-C. Picot:http://empedocles.acragas.googlepages.com/cmr_orfeo_y_el_orfismo

– Aportación del papiro de Estrasburgo (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666) a la comprensión de la demonología de Empédocles, in: Actas del XI Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, Antonio Alvar Ezquerra (ed.), Vol. 2, Madrid, 2005, p. 423-434.

– La concepción empedoclea de la miseria humana: entre psicología, religión y moralidad, p. 55-63, in: La dignità e la miseria dell'uomo nel pensiero europeo. Atti del convegno internazionale di Madrid, 20-22 maggio 2004, ed. Guido M. Cappelli, Roma : Salerno, 2006. (Studi e saggi ; 40.) (B 2, B3, B 4, B 5,  B 11, B 15, B 110, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 124, B 129, B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.)

– Empédocles y el orfismo, in: Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, eds. A. Bernabé – F. Casadesús, Madrid: Akal 2008, vol. 2, p. 1105-1140.

– La transmigración en la poesía de Empédocles, in: Reencarnación: La transmigración de las almas entre Oriente y Occidente, A. Bernabé - M. Kahle - M. A. Santamaría Álvarez (eds.), Madrid, Abada 2011, p. 269-282.  

Mele, Alfonso, Empedocle e Agrigento, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, pp.179-188.

Meriani, Angelo, 'Anaίsimoj: da Plutarco ad Empedocle (Emp. fr. 27 a D.- K. = Plut., Mor. 777 C), in: Contributi di filologia greca, ed. I. Gallo, Napoli 1990, p. 121-5.

Merker, Anne, La vision chez Platon et Aristote, International Plato Studies, Vol. 16, Saint Augustin : Academia Verlag 2003 , p. 26-30 (B 84) and 48-9 (A 92).

Merzdorf, Reinhold, Quaestiunculae Empedoclae, in: Commentationes philologae, scripserunt Seminarii Philologi Regii Lipsiensis... sodales, Lipsiae : G. Curtio dicatae 1874, p. 41-56.

Messina, Gaetano, Il lessico di Empedocle, in: Index Empedocleus, Genova 1991, I.81-97.

– Empedocle “rivisatato”: testo, traduzione e commento dei frammenti di Strasburgo (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666), in: Giornale di metafisica 24, 2002, p. 5-69. (B 17, Pap. Strasb.).

– Una nuova lettura di Empedocle 100 DK, in: Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, 27, 2005, p. 777-788. (B 100.)

– Dalla fisica di Senofane all'Empedocle di Strasburgo: studi di filosofia presocratica, Bari: Levante editori 2007, (Le Rane 48). (P. 101-165: Empedocle “rivisatato”already published  in: Giornale di metafisica 24, 2002; p. 167-176: Una nuova lettura di Empedocle 100 DK, which is a favourable reading of Rossetti's article Empedocle scienziato, and already published in Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, 27, 2005.)

Mesturini, Anna Maria, L’eclissi di sole in Empedocle e Lucrezio, in: Studi italiani in filologia classica 80, 1987, p. 173-80.

– Per una nuova interpretazione del fr. 93 D.-K. di Empedocle, in: Bolletino dei classici 13, 1992, p. 107-116.

Metropoulos, K., Ιατρική προσωκρατικων φιλοσόφων, in: Platon 15, 1963, p. 196-217 (Emp.: p. 212-4).

Métral A., Compte rendu de Memorie sulla vita d'Empedocle Gergentino di Domenico Scinà (1813), Bulletin  des sciences historiques, Antiquité, Philologie, IV, 1825, p. 313-314.

Michelini, Ann N., The Dance of the Elements: Fragment B 17 of Empedocles, in: Power and Spirit, ed. J. Siegfried, Annales Universitatis Turkuensis Ser. B No 199 Turku : Turun Yliopisto, 1993, p. 27-41.

Mikalson, Jon D., Greek Popular Religion in Greek Philosophy, Oxford University Press 2010. (Empedocles: p. 69-70, B 128.)

Miller, Patrick Lee, Becoming God: pure reason in early Greek philosophy, London - New York: Continuum 2011. (Several quotations through the book.  Some pages dedicated to Empedocles: p. 72-74.)

Millerd (Smertenko), Clara Elizabeth, On the Interpretation of Empedocles (diss.), Chicago 1908 (New York 19802).

Minar, Edwin L., Cosmic periods in the philosophy of Empedocles, in: Phronesis 8, 1963, p. 127-145. (Reprint in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. J. P. Anton -  G. L. Kustas, Albany: SUNY 1971, p. 39-58.)

– Pre-Socratic Studies, 1953-1966, in: Classical World 60.4,1966, p.143-163. (Empedocles: p. 160.)

Minz, Hubert, Anfänge des Naturrechts bei Empedokles (diss.), Bonn 1960.

– Anfänge des Naturrechts bei Empedokles und ein Vergleich mit dem Naturrecht des Sophisten Antiphon, Inaugural - Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Hohen Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Köln, Bonn: G. Menden 1960. (B 9, B 135.)

Misener,Geneva, Loxus, Physician and Physiognomist, in: Classical Philology 18/1, 1923, pp. 1-22 (A 97; a role of blood in Emp. theory of soul and thinking; not very informative and decisive for Emp. studies, but with interesting parallels in medicinal and philosophic speculations in 5th and 4th B. C.)

Mondolfo, Rodolpho, Imitazioni e polemiche, in: Marcovich, Miroslav – Mondolfo, Rodolpho – Tarán, Leonard, Eraclito. Testimonianze, imitazioni e frammenti. Introduzione di G. Reale, Milano 2007, pp. 194-198 (B 3.9-14, B 16, B 17.1-2 and 16-17, B 17.3-5, B 106, B 110.3-5, B 135).

Mongitore, Antonio, Bibliotheca sicula sive de scriptoribus siculis, Panormi 1707 (tomus I) a 1714 (tomus II), I.174-9 (a solid biography of Emp. accompanied with plenty of references to primary sources and contemporary scholars).

Montano, Aniello, Senso e ragione nella gnoseologia di Empedocle di Agrigentino, in: Montano, A, Methodos: Aspetti dei metodi e dei processi cognitivi nella Grecia Antica, Napoli: Loffredo 2014, (σκέψις, 25), p. 25-65 (chapter 3).

Montevecchi, Federica, Sulla complessità di Empedocle. Per un bilancio storiografico, in: Hortus Musicus, Anno VI, n° 21, 2005, p. 128-131.

– review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, eds. L. Rossetti, C. Santaniello , in Hypnos, 17, 2006, p. 139-142. Review in: Hypnos

– L'eterno movimento della physis. Alcune riflessioni su Empedocle di Agrigento, in: La società degli individui, 28, 2007, p. 9-21.

– Empedocle fra mythos e logos, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 71-82. (B 6, B 42,  B 134

– Empedocle d'Agrigentino, Napoli : Liguori 2010.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qo25qX5r1o : "Empedocle: il discorso dell'antichità su amicizia e contesa." 12 November 2011.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1yA-jF1bi4 : "Amore e odio: Empedocle e Freud", Secondo incontro della terza edizione del corso base di formazione filosofica "Pensare la vita". 7 March 2013. 

Montuori, M., Chi sono i σοφισταί in Aristoph. Nub. vv. 332-338, in: Atti della accademia di scienze morali e politiche de la sozieta nazionale di scienze 97, 1986, p. 7-15.

Morana Cyril, Oudin Eric, Découvrir la philosophie antique, Paris, Eyrolles, 2009. (Empedocles: p. 25-7.)

Morchio, Renzo, La “fisica” di Empedocle tra cosmologie e genetica, in: Index Empedocleus I, Genova 1991, p. 49-68.

Moreno, Inmaculada Rodríguez, ΔΑΙΜΟΝΕΣ, ΗΡΩΕΣ Υ ΑΓΓΕΛΟΙ en la filosofía presocrática, in: Habis 26, 1995, p. 29-46. (Empedocles: p. 37-40. B 21, B 23, B 59, B 112, B 115, B 126, B 134.)

Morgan, Kathryn A., Myth and philosophy from the pre-Socratics to Plato, Cambridge University Press, 2000. Empedocles: pp. 59-62.

Morgan Michael L, Review of Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic- Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition by P. Kingsley, in: The American Historical Review Vol. 102 issue 4, 1997, p. 1129-1131.

Mori, Luca, Empedocle alla luce della complessità, in: Quaderni del ramo d'oro on-line, n° 4, 2011, p. 121-133 (but read as p. 1-13).

Moriani, Fausto, Materia comune e generazione degli elementi in Aristotele, in: Elenchos 9, 1988, p. 329-51 (on the beginning of De gen. et corr. Aristotle criticized Emp. conception of 4 elements).

Morley, John, Empedocles and Diderot, in: Fortnightly Review 1, 1875, p. 786.

Moriss, S. P., Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992, p. 221. (B 62.)

Morrison, J. S., Parmenides and Er, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 75, 1955, p. 59-68.

Mortley, R. J., The Bond of the Cosmos: A Significant Metaphor (Tim. 31c ff.), in: Hermes 97, 1969, p. 372-3.

Most, Glenn W., The poetics of early Greek Philosophy, in: The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. by A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 332-62.

– The Stillbirth of a Tragedy: Nietzsche and Empedocles, in: The Empedoclean kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 31-44.

– ἄλλος δ’ ἐξ ἄλλου δέχεται. Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic, in: Literatur und Religion, 1,1, Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, ed. Bierl, A.- Lämmle, R.- Wesselmann, K., Berlin-New York: W. De Gruyter 2007, (MythosEikonPoiesis 1/1), p. 271–302. (B 115.)

Motte, André, Prairies et jardins de la Grèce antique: de la religion à la philosophie, Bruxelles, Palais des Académies, 1973 (B 17, B 21, B 27, B 35, B 66, B 98, B 112, B 134, B 146).

– Aspects du prophétisme grec, in: Prophéties et oracles, II, en Égypte et en Grèce, Supplément Cahiers Évangile n° 89, Paris: Éd. du Cerf 1994, p. 41-78. (B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 128, B 129 B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.)

Mourelatos, Alexander P. D., The Route of Parmenides, Yale University Press 1970.

– Empedocles, in: Dictionary of Scientific Biography I-XI, ed. by C. C. Gillispie, New York : Scribner 1971, IV.367-9.

– Pre-Socratic Origins of the Principle that there are no Origins from Nothing, in: Journal of Philosophy 78/11, 1981, p. 649-65 (mainly par. 4 is devoted to Emp., i. e. p. 658-664: B 11, B 12, B 17.30-3).

– Quality, Structure, and Emergence in later Pre-Socratic Philosophy, in: Proceedings of the Boston area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2, 1987, p. 127-94. (Par. 4, p. 138-143: B 96, B 71, B 23; par. 8-12, p. 163-93: A 78, A 86-87-89-92, A 94, B 8, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 31, B 33, B 34, B 76, B 87, B 89, B 91, B 96, B 98.).

– The Concept of the Universal in some later Pre-Platonic Cosmologists, in: A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. M. L Gill - P. Pellegrin, Malden - Oxford - Victoria: Blackwell Publishing 2006, (Blackwell companions to philosophy), p. 56-76. (A section about Empedocles: p. 64-65. Title: Empedocles: Formulae for Compounds; Biological Forms; Type-Identities Across Cycles)

– Review of Mansfeld J. - Primavesi O., Die Vorsokratiker, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 2011, in: Classical Journal-Online, 2014.06.08, p. 1-5. http://cj.camws.org/sites/default/files/reviews/2014.06.09 Mourelatos on Mansfield and Primavesi.pdf

Moutsopoulos, Évanghélos, Le modèle empédocléen de pureté élémentaire et ses fonctions, in: Giornale di metafisica 21, 1999, p. 127-32 (according B. Šijaković an article with the same title was also published in Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto 1989, p. 119-25). 

– To what extent are Empedocles' elements pure?, in: Diotima 43, 2015, p. 131-133.

Mpozónés, Geórgios A., Ατοπα της φιλοσοφίας του Εμπεδοκλέους, 1974 (???).

Muccioli, Federicomaria, Diventare un dio a Selinunte? Empedocle e la bonifica/purificazione della città, in: La città inquieta: Selinunte tra lex sacra Defixiones, ed. A. Iannucci, F. Muccioli, M. Zaccarini, Milano: Mimesis 2015, p. 261-284.

Mugler, Charles, Sur quelques fragments d’Empédocle, in: Revue de Philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 25, 1951, p. 33-65 (B 84, B 17.3-5, B 85, A 92, B 22).

– Deux thèmes de la cosmologie grecque, devenir cyclique et pluralité des mondes, Paris : Klincksieck 1953, p. 30-58.

– Pluralisme matériel et pluralisme dynamique dans la physique grecque d'Anaximandre à Epicure, in: Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 35, 1961, p. 67-86.

–  Les Origines de la science grecque chez Homère : l'homme et l'univers physique, Paris : C. Klincksieck 1963, (Etudes et Commentaires XLVI). (P. 141 : B 84.)

– Le Vide des atomistes et les pores d’Empédocle: à propos d'un passage d'Aristote, in: Revue de philologie 3/41, 1967, p. 217-24.

– Kosmologische Formeln, in: Hermes 96, 4, 1968, p. 515-26 (p. 525-6: in B 26.5 it is necessary to read εἰς ἓν ἅπαντα from B 17.7 instead of the traditional version εἰς ἕνα κόσμον).

Mühl, Max, Über die Missgeschöpfe bei Empedokles, in: Rheinisches Museum 114, 1971, p. 289-96. (B 57.)

Mullach, Friedrich Wilhelm August, Disputatio de Empedoclis Proemio (Germaniae philologos Berolinum congressos Societatis Gymnasiorum Berolinensium sodales salvere iubent, interprete Frid. Guil. Augusto Mullachio), typis A. G. Schadii, Berolini 1850 (22 p.; reprinted in 1860, I.xiii-xxvi).

– Quaestionum Empedoclearum specimen secundum, in: Programme d’invitation à l'examen public du Collège Royal Français, fixé au 30 Septembre 1853, Berlin : Starcke 1853 (47 p.; reprinted mostly in 1860, I.1-80).

– Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum, Paris 1860, I.xii-xxvii and 1-80 (edition, translation and commentary of B fragments = http://gallica.bnf.fr/).

Müller, Carl Werner, Gleiches zu Gleichem. Ein Princip frühgriechischen Denkens (diss.), Bonn 1965, p. 26-64.

Müller, Dietram, Handwerk und Sprache: Die sprachlichen Bilder aus dem Bereich des Handwerks in der griechischen Literatur bis 400 v. Chr., Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain 1974, (Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, Heft 51). (B 33, B 34, B 73, B 96.)

Munding, Heinz, Zur Beweisführung des Empedokles, in: Hermes 82.2, 1954, p. 129-44.

– Naturwissenschaftliches aus Altsprachlicher Sicht, in: Der Altsprachliche Unterricht 27/5, 1984, p. 69-77 (B 17.2).

Muñoz Valle, Isidoro, Le problème des homoeméries dans le système d’Anaxagoras, in: L’Antiquité classique 45, 1976, p. 587-92 (on Aristotle’s conception of Anaxagoras’ homoemeries and Empedocles’ roots; A 46).

Mureddu, Patrizia, La “incomunicabilità” gorgiana in una parodia di Aristofane? Nota a Thesm. 5-21, in: Lexis 9-10, 1992, p. 115-20 (Thesm. 5-21 allegedly alludes to Gorgias and Emp., A 49, A 90, B 70, B 84, B 117.).

Mutschmann, H[ermann?], Über Parmenides B 1 Diels und Empedokles B 137.3, in: Zeitschrift für Gymnasialwissenschaft 66, 1912, p. 800.

NNN

Nagy, Albino, Di alcuni scritti attribuiti a Empedocle, in: Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei 10, 1901, p. 307-20 and 325-47 (on presence of Emp. in Arabian and Hebrew literature and philosophy; outdated by de Smet, 1999).

Nagy, Gregory, Hymnic elements in Empedocles (B 35 DK = 201 Bollack), in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXIV(1), 2006, p. 51-62.

Naiden F.S., Smoke Signals for the Gods: Ancient Greek Sacrifice from the Archaic through Roman Periods, Oxford - New York: Oxford University Press 2013. (Empedocles: p. 281-282; B 128.)

Nauck, August, Euripideische Studien I-II, St. Petersbourg : Eggers et comp. - Samuel Schmidt (Riga) - Leopold Voss (Leipzig) 1859, 1862, I.32-3, n. 1 (B 67.1-2: some textual suggestions).

Nelis, Damien, Patrick, Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, Leeds: Francis Cairns Publications, 2001. (Love and Strife; p. 98-111, 346-355.) 

– Georgics 2.458-542, Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles, in: Dictynna, 1, 2004, p. 1-21. http://dictynna.revues.org/161 (B 128).

– Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.416-51: noua monstra and the foedera naturae, in: Paradox and the marvellous in Augustan literature and culture, ed. by Philip R. Hardie, Oxford University Press, 2009,  p. 248-267 (Chap. 13). (Empedocles and Apollonius Rh. p. 254-256.)

– Empedoclean epic: how far can you go?, in: Dictynna  [http://dictynna.revues.org/1057], 11, 2014.

Nélod, Gilles, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Bruxelles : Office de Publicité 1959, 105 p. (19612, 164 p.; a popular work).

Nestle, Wilhelm, Der Dualismus des Empedokles, in: Philologus 65, 1906, p. 545-57. 

– Bemerkungen zu den Vorsokratikern und Sophisten, in: Philologus 67, 1908, p. 531-84 (Emp.: p. 538-43).

– Die Vorsokratiker in Auswahl übersetz und herausgegeben, von Wilhelm. Nestle, Iena: E. Diederichs 1908, p. 41-45,135-151, p. 243. Ed. 1922: p. 42-46; p. 138-155, p. 263.

Nicolai, Walter, Der Mythos von Sündenfall der Seele (bei Empedokles und Platon), in: Gymnasium 88, 1981, p. 512-24.

Nilles, J. Cl., Le fragment 8 d’Empédocle selon la perspective de Plutarque et d’Aristote, in: Mnemosyne 42, 1989, p. 365-79.

Nonvel Pieri, Stefania, Empedocle: una struttura di duplicità, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, pp. 157-178.

Norden, Eduard, Agnostos Theos. Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede, Leipzig 1913, p. 100, 130-3 and 198.

– Die antike Kuntstprosa I, Leipzig - Berlin 19153, p. 15-9.

– Ennius und Vergilius. Kriegsbilder aus Rom grosser Zeit, Leipzig - Berlin: Teubner 1915, p. 10-8 (chap: “Ennius Empedocleus”).

Notopoulos, James, A, The Symbolism of the Sun and Light in the Republic of Plato. I , in: Classical Philology, 39, 3, 1944, p. 163-172. (P. 170-171: Empedocles; A 56, B 132, sun as a reflection; moon and reflection of light.)

Nucci, Matteo, L’Empedocle di Strasburgo. La questione delle tre Theta, in: Elenchos, XXVI (2), 2005, p. 379-401.

– Chaos e kosmos nel “nuovo” Empedocle, in: Chaos e Kosmos, VI, 2005, p. 1-14 (on line)  http://www.chaosekosmos.it/pdf/2005_02.pdf

– La morte dell'Amicizia in Empedocle, in: Amicizia e concordia, ed. Spinelli, E., Roma 2006, pp. 45-74.

Nünlist, René, Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung, Stuttgart - Leipzig: B. G. Teubener, 1998, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 101).

– Poetological Imagery in Empedocles, in: The Empedoclean kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 73-92.

Nutton, Vivian, Ancient Medicine, London - New York: Routledge 2004.

OOO

Obbink, Dirk, Hermachus, Against Empedocles, in: Classical Quarterly 38, 1988, p. 428-35.

– The Addressees of Empedocles, in: Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici 31, 1993, p. 51-98 (B 112).

– A Quotation of the Derveni Papyrus in Philodemus’ On piety, in: Bollettino del centro internazionale per lo studio dei papyri ercolanesi 24, 1994, p. 111-35 (p. 119-21: A 334).

Obeyesekere Gananath, Imagining Karma: ethical transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek rebirth, Berkeley - Los Angeles - London: University of California Press, 2002. (Ethicization and Soteriology in Empedocles: p. 214-232; B 29, B 62, B 113, B 115, B 119, B 127, B 128, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 146, B 147.)  

O’Brien, Denis, Empedocles fr. 35.14-15, in: The Classical Review 15, 1965, p. 1-4. (B 35.)

– Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle, in: Classical Quarterly 17, 1967, p. 29-40.

– The Relation of Anaxagoras and Empedocles, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 88, 1968, p. 93-113 (A 6).

– Derived Light and Eclipses in the Fifth Century, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 88, 1968, p. 114-127. (A 30, A 60, A 61.)

– Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle: A Reconstruction from the Fragments and Secondary Sources, Cambridge : University Press 1969.

– The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 90, 1970, p. 140-179.

– Review of G. Zuntz, Persephone, in: The Times Literary Supplement, 25 August 1972, p. 992.

– Review of H. Lambridis, Empedocles, in: The Times Literary Supplement, 8 April 1977, p. 439.

– Temps et intemporalité chez Parménide, in: Les Études philosophiques, 3, 1980, p. 257-272. (p. 268-269: Empédocle, B 17.32.)

– Pour interpréter Empédocle, Paris : Les Belles Lettres - Leiden : Brill 1981.

– Review of Lynne Ballew: Straight and circular, a study of imagery in Greek philosophy, in: Les études philosophiques,1982, p. 354-356.

– Review of C. Gallavotti, Empedocle, poema fisico e lustrale, in: Gnomon 54, 1982, p. 225-234. 

– Héraclite et l’unité des opposés, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale 95, 1990, p. 147-71.

– Comment écrire l'histoire de la philosophie? Héraclite et Empédocle sur l’un et le multiple, in: Rue Descartes, Collège international de philosophie 1-2, 1991, p. 121-38.

– Empedocles Revisited, in: Ancient Philosophy 15, 1995, p. 403-70.

– Empédocle, in: Le Savoir grec, Dictionnaire critique, ed. J Brunschwig, G.E.R. Lloyd, Paris: Flammarion 1996, p. 632-645.

– L’Empédocle de Platon, in: Revue des Études Grecques 110, 1997, p. 381-98.

– Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient Philosophy, in: Isis 89, 1998, p. 122-4.

– Plato and Empedocles on Evil, in: Traditions of Platonism. Essays in Honour of John Dillon, ed. by J. J. Cleary, Aldershot (Hampshire) - Brookfield (Vt.) : Ashgate 1999, p. 3-27.

– Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles’ double destruction of the cosmos (Aetius II 4.8), in: Phronesis 45, 2000, p. 1-18 (A 521).

– Empedocles: The Wandering Daimon and the Two Poems, in: Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 79-179 (B 115).

– Die Aristophanes-Rede im Symposion: der Empedokleische Hintergrund und seine philosophische Bedeutung, in: Platon als Mythologe, Neue Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen, ed. M. Janke, C. Schäfer, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 2002, p. 179-193.

– Space and Movement: Two Anomalies in the text of the Timaeus, in: Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel ‘Timeo’, ed. C. Natali - S. Maso, Amsterdam 2003, p. 121-48 (on presence of Emp. in Plato’s Timaeus).

– Empedocles: A Synopsis, in: Frühgriechisches Denken, ed. Georg Rechenauer, Göttingen : Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2005, p. 316-42. 

– Empédocle: Vie et après-vie, in: Humanities - Christianity and Culture 36, 2005, p. 1-18.

– Le Parménide historique et le Parménide de Platon, in: Plato’s Parmenides: Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, ed. Aleš Havlíček - Filip Karfík, Prague : OIKOUMENH 2005, p. 234-56. Reprint in Platon, ed. Dixsaut M. et al., Paris: Ellipses 2013, p. 89- 106, (Collection Lectures de...). (Empedocles: p. 244-50 in 2005, p. 97-102 in 2013; τὸ πᾶν ; B 13, B 17.32).

– Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s ‘Symposium’: The Empedoclean background and its philosophical significance, in: Plato’s Symposium. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, 12. - 15. October, 2005, ed. Aleš Havlíček - Martin Cajthaml, Prague: OIKOUMENH 2007, p. 59-85.

– Life beyond the stars: Aristotle, Plato and Empedocles, in: Common to body and soul, philosophical approaches to explaining living behaviour in Greco-Roman antiquity, ed. R.A.H. King, Berlin/New York: W. de Gruyter 2006, pp. 49-102. (B 17, B 21, B 22, B 35, B 96, B 98, B 115.)

– 'Immortel' et 'Impérissable' dans le Phédon de Platon, in: The international journal of the platonic tradition, I, 2007, p.109-262. (Empedocles: p. 207-211 ; B 35.14.)

– Annette Rosenfeld-Löffler: La poétique d’Empédocle. Cosmologie et métaphore. Thèse de doctorat présentée à la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Lausanne, in: Gnomon, Vol. 81(2), 2009, pp. 97-107.

– Μονίηι in Empedocles: Slings' "iron rule", in: Mnemosyne, 63(2), 2010, p. 268-271. (B 27.)

– Themselves alone: Empedocles' description of the elements, in: λόγον διδόναι. La filosofia come esercizio del render ragione. Studi in onore di Giovanni Casertano, ed. Lidia Palumbo, Napoli : Loffredo 2011, p. 221-232.

– Empedocles' "mountain path" (Fr. 24), in: Elenchos, 33 (2), 2012, p. 301-333. (B 24.)

O’Brien, Denis, – Rashed, Marwan, Empédocle, fragment 32 Diels, in: Revue des études grecques 114/2, 2001, p. 349-58.

O'Neill, Agnes, Thomas Aquinas, Sister, The Pre-Socratic use of ψυχή as a term for the principle of motion, (diss.), Washington D. C: National Capital Press 1915, p. 36-38.

Oehler, R., Friedrich Nietzsche und die Vorsokratiker, Leipzig 1904, p. 89-98.

Ogle, M. B., Laurel in Ancient Religion and Folk-lore, in: American Journal of Philology 31, 1910, p. 287-311 (p. 297-8: B 140).

O’Keefe, M. D., The Search for Control. A Study of the Origins of the Thought of Empedocles and Heraclitus (diss.), Michigan State University, East Lansing 1969.

Olerud, Anders, L’idée de macrocosmos et de microcosmos dans le Timée de Platon, Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri 1951. P. 43-4: chap. II.1.1: Le dieu cosmique de Platon et le Sphairos d’Empédocle. P. 77-87 : chap. II.2: La doctrine des quatre éléments chez Platon et Empédocle. P. 209 : chap. III.12: La doctrine grecque du pneuma et de l’éther. Le Sphairos d’Empédocle. (B 6, B 17, B 23, B 29, B 96, B 115,) 

O'Meara, Dominic, Empédocle Fragment 143 : Un nouveau témoignage chez Jean Italos, in: REG 123, 2010/2, pp. 877-879. (B 143.)

Onians, Richard Broxton, The Origins of European Thought, Cambridge 1991 (19511), p. 25-30 (B 5: φρήν : p. 28 n.6), 51-2, 194 (B 111.9: μένος), p. 54, 71 (B 105), p. 141 (B 134), p. 202-3 (B 6.3), p. 341 (B 17.15).

Opsopaus, John, Ancient Greek Esoteric Doctrine of the Elements, 1998-9 (based on a series of articles published in Circle Network News, Issues 68-71), http://www.cs.utk.edu/~mclennan/BA/AGEDE/index.html (general mystical meditations on four elements and Empedocles, strongly dependent on P. Kingsley).

O’Rourke, Donncha,  Lovers in Arms: Empedoclean Love and Strife in Lucretius and the Elegists, in: Dictynna  [http://dictynna.revues.org/1080], 11, 2014.

Osborne, Catherine (see also Rowett), Empedocles Recycled, in: Classical Quarterly 37, 1987, p. 24-50.

– Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy. Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics, London : Duckworth 1987.

– Was Verse the Default Form for Presocratic Philosophy?, in: Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Catherine Atherton, Bari: Levante Editori 1998, (Nottingham Classical Literature Studies, vol. 5, 1997), p. 23-35.

– Empedocles Scholarship, in: Times Literary Supplement, June 4, 1999, p. 17.

– Rummaging in the Recycling Bins of Upper Egypt: A discussion of A. Martin and O. Primavesi, ‘L’Empédocle de Strasbourg’, in: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18, 2000, p. 329-56.

– Presocratic Philosophy: A very short Introduction, (Very short Introductions, Nr. 103), Oxford : Oxford University Press 2004.

– Sin and Moral Responsibility in Empedocles’s Cosmic Cycle, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. by A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 283-308.

– Empedocles, in: Dumb beasts and dead philosophers: humanity and the humane in ancient philosophy and literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007, p. 50-54. (In Chapter 3: On the Transmigration of Souls: Reincarnation Into Animal Bodies in Pythagoras, Empedocles, and Plato. B 137.)

Osborne, H., Colour Concepts of the Ancient Greeks, in: British Journal of Aesthetics 8.3, p. 269-283.

Ouvrard, Florence, Les poètes philosophes présocratiques et l'épopée homérique : Quelques aspects de leur pensée religieuse et morale, Diss. Université Paris Sorbonne - UFR de Grec, Dir. Paul Demont, 2010. (P. 103-146 : Partie III: L'Epique chez Empédocle [à partir du fr. 17 DK et du papyrus de Strasbourg a(i) et a (ii)].)

Owens, Joseph, Aristotle on Empedocle Fr. 8, in: Essays on Plato and the Pre-Socratics (= Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. 2), ed. by R. A. Shiner - J. King-Farlow, Edmonton (Alberta) : Humanities Centre of the University of Alberta 1976, p. 87-100.

PPP

Padel, Ruth, In and out of the mind : Greek images of the tragic self, Princeton : Princeton University Press 1992 (pp. 41-42 : B 3 ; p. 42-43 : B 105 ; p. 43 : B 98 ; p. 60 : B 84 ; p. 89 : B 100). 

Padró, J., Deux possibles mentions des quatre éléments dans la littérature égyptienne classique, in: Faventia 2/2, 1980, p. 5-17 (B 6 and 4 elements in the ancient Egypt).

Palmer, John, Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford: 2009. (Empedocles' Element theory and Parmenides: p. 260-312. (B 2, B 3, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 62, B 96, B 100, B 112, B 129, B 133, B 134, a(i), a(ii), b, c, d, e, f.)

– Revelation and Reasoning in Kalliopeia’s Address to Empedocles, in: Rhizomata, 2013, 1(2), p. 308-329. (Kalliopeia is addressing Empedocles in B 2, B 23, B 111. Empedocles will re-present, as his generic models Hesiod and Parmenides re-presented before him, the revelation he initially received from a divine source. B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 23, B 112, B 111, B 115, B 131, B 146.)

– Elemental Change in Empedocles, in: Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 30-54. On-line:  http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1/issue-files/rhiz.2016.4.issue-1.xml

Lapini, Walter, La morte di Empedocle (Emped. A 1 DK), in: W. Lapini, Studi di filologia filosofica greca, Firenze: Olschki 2003, p. 91-114. 

– Empedocle e la melanconia, in: Anthropos & Iatria, 7.1, 2003, p. 48-54.

– Empedocle B 16, 2 D.-K., in: Elenchos, 2005, 26, 1, p. 111-118. (B 16.)

– Empedocle e il tempo inestinguibile (B 16 DK), in: W. Lapini, Testi frammentari e critica del testo, Problemi di filologia filosofica greca, Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 2013, p. 87-102. (New version, modified and extended, of Empedocle B 16.2 DK, in: Elenchos 26, 2005. B 16.)

– Empedocle e la lanterna (B 84.3 DK), in: W. Lapini, Testi frammentari e critica del testo, Problemi di filologia filosofica greca, Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 2013, p. 103-115. (B 84.)

Kirk, Geoffrey S. - Raven, John E., The Presocratic Philosophers: a critical history with a selection of texts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1957 (reprinted with corrections: 1960, 1962, 1963), p. 320-361.

Kirk, Geoffrey S. - Raven, John E. - Schofield, Malcolm, The Presocratic Philosophers, Cambridge 1983 (second corrected edition), p. 280-321 (Chapter X).

Kirk, Geoffrey S., Heraclitus, The Cosmic Fragments, Cambridge University Press 19784.

Kissel , Myriam, Les Purifications d'Empédocle : ascèse et responsabilité, in: Travaux et Documents, Journée de l'Antiquité 2005-2006 (tome 1), M. Kissel (éd.), n°29, janvier 2007, Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de l'Université de la Réunion, p. 109-133. (B 112, B 115, B 124, B 128, B 131, B 134, B 136, B 137, B 139.)

Knatz, Fridericus, Empedoclea, in: Schedae philologae Hermanno Usener a sodalibus Seminarii Regii Bonnensis oblatae, Bonn : F. Cohen 1891, p. 1-9. (B 6, B 38.4, B 115.3-5, B 24, B 17.25, B 121.2.)

Kofman, Sarah, Freud et Empédocle, in: Critique 265, 1969, p. 525-50.

Kohlschitter, Silke A., Parmenides and Empedocles in Porphyry’s History of Philosophy, in: Hermathena 150, 1991, p. 43-53. (B 1172).

– The Interpretation of Empedocles in the Tradition of Middle- and Neoplatonism (diss.), Dublin 1991.

Kołakowska, Katarzyna, Mit u Empedoklesa, Kraków: Wydawnictwo "Scriptum" - Tomasz Sekunda, 2012.

Koning, Hugo H., Hesiod: the other poet. Ancient reception of a cultural icon, Leiden - Boston: Brill 2010. (P. 166-170: B 115; p. 195: B 6; p. 210-217: Revelation Modified [Parmenides and Empedocles], B 3, B 131.)

Körner, U., Entstehung des Lebens: Moderne Auffassungen und naturwissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse in Bezug auf Ansichten des Empedokles, in: Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 20/2, 1971, p. 225-9.

Kotwick Mirjam E., Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Berkeley: California Classical Studies 2016. (California Classical Studies, 4).

Kouremenos Theokritos et al., The Derveni Papyrus, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki 2006, (Studi e testi per il corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, 13). (B 134.)

Krafft, Fritz, Anaxagoras und Empedokles, in: Die Grossen der Weltgeschichte I, Zürich 1971, I.466-82.

Kranz, Walther, Empedokles und die Atomistik, in: Hermes 47.1, 1912, p. 18-42.

– Die ältesten Farbenlehren der Griechen, in: Hermes 47, 1912, p. 126-40.

– Vorsokratisches III. Die Katharmoi und die Physika des Empedokles, in: Hermes 70, 1, 1935, p. 111-9 (= W. K, Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken: Kleine Schriften, hrsg. von E. Vogt, Heidelberg : Winter 1967, p. 105-14). (B2, B 3, B 6, B 77-78, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 124, B 127, B 129, B 130, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 140, B 143, B 146.)

– Gleichnis und Vergleich in der frühgriechischen Philosophie, in: Hermes 73, 1938, p. 99-122.

– Kosmos und Mensch in der Vorstellung frühen Griechentums, in: Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philol. - Hist. Klasse, 1938, p. 121-61 (B 45 aj.). Reprint in Kranz W., herausgegeben von Ernst Vogt, Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken, Kleine Schriften (Heidelberg: Carl Winter 1967), p. 165-196.

– Kosmos als philosophischer Begriff frühgriechischer Zeit, in: Philologus 93, 1938, p. 430-48, p. 443-4 (B 134.4, A 50, B 31). 

– Lukrez und Empedokles, in: Philologus 96, 1943, p. 68-107.

– Empedokles, Antike Gestalt und romantische Neuschöpfung, Zürich : Artemis 1949.

– Vorsokratische Denker: Auswahl aus dem Überlieferten - Griechisch und Deutsch, Berlin – Frankfurt: Weidmann, 1949. (Empedocles: p. 121-153.)

– Die griechische Philosophie, Stuttgardt 1955, p. 68-78.

– Zwei kosmologische Fragen, in: Rheinisches Museum für Philosophie 100, 1957, p. 114-29.

– Die Sonne als Titan, in: Philologus 105, 1961, p. 290-5.

Krell, David Farrell, Nietzsche Hölderlin Empedokles, in: Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 15/2, 1991, p. 31-48.

– Hölderlin's Death of Empedocles : a new translation, in: Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2008, 12, 2, pp. 289-311.

Krische, August Bernhard, Die theologischen Lehren der griechischen Denker, eine Prüfung der Darstellung Cicero's (= Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der alten Philosophie, vol. 1), Göttingen : Dieterich, 1840, p. 116-129. (B 6).

Krüger, J. S., Die plek van Empedokles in die metafisies-mistieke tradisie, in: Ηervormde teologiese studies Vol. 63, 2, 2007, p. 409-430. http://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/article/view/223/157

Kulig, Katarzyna [then Kolakowska], “Dlatego ogarnięci wielką nikczemnoscią, nigdy nie uwolnicie serca od smutnego cierpienia” - Empedoklejski grzech [“And this is why, seized with great wickedness, you’ll never rid your heart of sad suffering” - Empedoclean Sin], in: Roczniky humanistyczne 52/3, 2004, p. 97-108. (B 112, B 3.1-8, B 131, B 128, B 137, B 139, B 141, B 115, B 126; an unoriginal and rather superficial sketch of daimon’s cycle.)  https://kul.academia.edu/KatarzynaKo%C5%82akowska

Kurfess, Christopher John, Restoring Parmenides’ poem: essays toward a new arrangement of the fragments based on a reassessment of the original sources, Dissertation submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh, 2012. (B2, B3.) http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/16704/1/KurfessCJ_ETD2012.pdf

Kyriakou, Poulheria, Empedoclean Echoes in Apollonius Rhodius’ “Argonautica”, in: Hermes 122, 1994, p. 309-319 (B 272.3, B 62, B 124).

LLL

Lackenbacher, Hans, Beiträge zur antiken Optik, in: Wiener Studien 35, 1913, p. 34-61 (Emp.: p. 39-45; B 84).

La Croce, Ernesto, Empedocles’ Sphairos and Parmenidean Legacy, in: Platon 32-3, 1980-1, p. 114-22.

La Croce, Ernesto,  Empédocles de Agrigento, in: Los filósofos presocráticos, II, (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, 24), Madrid: Gredos 1979 (reimpr. 1985), p. 127-294. (All testimonies and fragments from DK, new order with a concordance table p. 417-420 ; many footnotes.)

La Croce, Ernesto - Eggers Lan, Conrado, Los filósofos presocráticos: Empédocles de Agrigento, Anaxágoras de Clazómenas - Introducciones, traducciones y notas, Barcelona : Planeta-Agostini 1996.

Lagrange, M-J., Introduction à l’étude du nouveau testament, 4e partie, Critique historique, I, Les mystères: l’orphisme, Paris : Gabalda et Compagnie, 1937, p. 156-65.

Lahman-Kuzmić, N., Suvremenost jedne Empedoklove misli [The contemporality of Empedocles’ mind], in: Forum 1-2, 1981, p. 302-27.

Laks, André, À propos d'un livre de V. der Ben : The Proem of Empedocles Peri Physios, in: Revue de Philologie, 52, 1978, p. 343-347.

– À propos du nouvel Empédocle: les vers 267-290 du poème physique étayent-ils l’hypothèse d’une double zoogonie?, in: Hyperboreus, 5, fasc. 1, 1999, (Bibliotheca classica petropolitana) p. 15-21. http://www.bibliotheca-classica.org/sites/default/files/laks.pdf

–  Soul, Sensation and Thought, in: The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 250-270. (B 3, B 100, B 105, B 106, B 108, B 109, B 134, B 138.) Reprint Ψυχή, Αίσθηση και Σκέψη in: Οι Προσωκρατικοί Φιλόσοφοι, Συναγωγή Συστατικών Μελετημάτων Θ. Νικολαίδης- Τ. Τυφλόπουλος (μτφρ.), Δ.Ιακώβ (επιμ.), Αθήνα: Παπαδήμα 2005, p. 361-388.

– À propos de l’édition du nouvel Empédocle de Strasbourg par A. Martin et O. Primavesi, in: Méthexis 14, 2001, p. 117-25.

– Reading the readings: On the first person plurals in the Strasburg Empedocles, in: Presocratic Philosophy, Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. by V. Caston - D. W. Graham, Aldershot: Ashgate 2002, p. 127-37.

– Phénomènes et références : éléments pour une réflexion sur la rationalisation de l’irrationnel, in: Methodos, 3 (Figures de l'irrationnel), 2003, p. 9-33, http://methodos.revues.org/205 , p. 1-21. (B 111, B 112.)

– Le Vide et la haine: éléments pour une histoire archaïque de la négativité, (Collection Libelles), Paris, PUF, 2004, p. 26-49 (B 17, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 147).

– Some Thoughts about Empedoclean Cosmic and Demonic Cycles, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 265-282.

– El vacío y el odio: Elementos para una historia arcaica de la negatividad, trad. Leopoldo Iribarren, Madrid: Arena Libro 2009 (later 2010). (Cf.  Le Vide et la haine.) 

– Hystéron protéron? Des Origines aux Purifications, in: La Philologie au présent. Pour Jean Bollack, ed. C. König - D. Thouard, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 2010, (Cahiers de philologie, 27), p. 19-26.

– Phenomenon and reference: revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the problem of rationalization, in: Modernity's Classics, ed. S.C. Humphreys - R.G. Wagner, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer 2013, p. 165-186. (Empedocles: p. 177-183 ; B 111.) 

– Sur quelques modalités de la raison pratique dans les cosmo-ontologies présocratiques, in: Nature and the Best Life. Exploring the Natural Bases of Practical Normativity in Ancient Philosophy, ed. G. Rossi, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: G. Olms 2013, p. 15-41. 

– Sommeils présocratiques, in: Le Sommeil : Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance, ed. V. Leroux, N. Palmieri, C. Pigné, Paris: Honoré Champion 2015, (Sciences, techniques et civilisations du Moyen Âge à l’aube des Lumières N°16), p. 29-50. (A 85.)

Lamberton, Robert,  Homer.The Theologian : Neoplatonist allegorical reading and the growth of epic tradition, 1986 (paperpack: 1989). (In an English translation of Stobaeus: B 126.)

Lambridis, Helle, Empedocles: A Philosophical Investigation. With a Pref. Essay ‘Empedocles and T. S. Eliots” by Marshall McLuhan, Alabama : University of Alabama Press 1976.

Lambropulou, Voula, The Concept of Harmony in Greek Thought from Homer to Aristotle 3: Cosmology, in: Platon 50, 1998, p. 145-68 (on cosmology of Heraclitus and Emp.).

Lami, A., I Presocratici. Testimonianze e frammenti da Talete a Empedocle, Milano 1991.

Laminne, Jacques, Les quatre éléments : le feu, l’air, l’eau, la terre. Histoire d’une hypothèse, in : Mémoires couronnés et autres mémoires publiés par l’Académie royale […] de Belgique, Tome LXV, fasc. 2, Bruxelles: Hayez 1904.

Lanata, Giuliana, 19. Empedocles, in: Poetica pre-platonica; testimonianze e frammenti, testo, traduzione e commento, Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1963, p. 128-135. (B 3, B 17, B 112, B 24, B 35, B 23.)

– Dans les antres de la sagesse : études parménidiennes, traduit de l’anglais par H. D. Saffrey, Paris : les Belles Lettres, 2007. (Fr. 146: p. 185).

– Filosofía antigua, misterios y magia : Empedocles y la tradicion pitagorica, Girona : Atalanta 2008.

– Ο ΕΜΠΕΔΟΚΛΗΣ ΣΤΟΝ 21ο ΑΙΩΝΑ (Empedocles for the New Millennium, published in Greek as a book, translation Ζάρρας Κωνσταντίνος), Thessaloniki: Αρχέτυπο 2008.

– Empédocle et la tradition pythagoricienne: Philosophie ancienne, mystère et magie, (translation by G. Lacaze of Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic), Belles Lettres, 2010, (coll. Vérité des mythes, 34).

Hunger, Herbert, Palimpsest-Fragmente aus Herodians Καθολικὴ προσῳδία, in: Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinischen Gesellschaft 16, 1967, p. 1-33. (B 153b.).

Hussey, Edward, The Presocratics, London 1972.

Hyland, Drew A., The Origins of Philosophy: its Rise in Myth and the Pre-socratics, New York 1973, p. 237-43.

III

Ierodiakonou, Katerina, Empedocles and the ancient painters, in: Colour in the ancient mediterranean world, (eds) Liza Cleland, Karen Stears, Glanys Davies, Oxford : John and Erica Hedges, 2004, (Bar International series, 1267), pp. 91-95.

– Empedocles on colour and colour vision, in: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, 2005, p. 1-37 (http://www.oup.co.uk/pdf/0-19-928744-9.pdf).

– Basic and mixed colors in Empedocles and Plato, in: L'Antiquité en couleurs : Catégories, Pratiques, Représentations, Textes réunis par Marcello Carastro, Grenoble: Jerôme Millon 2009. 

Imbraguglia, Giorgio et alii (ed.), Index Empedocleus. Vol 1, Vol. 2, Genova : Erga 1991 (Le opere e i giorni). Vol. 1: 212 pages. Vol. 2:  515 pages.

– La situazione del discorso di Empedocle, in: Index Empedocleus. Le opere e i giorni I-II, ed. G. Imbraguglia et alii, Genova : Erga 1991, p. 11-35.

Immisch, Otto, Sprachliches zum Seelenschmetterling, in: Glotta 6, 1915, p. 193-206. (Pages 197-202: a contribution to genesis of the idea of body as an envelope of soul; ad B 126).

Indelli, Giovanni, Filodemo ed Empedocle, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 277-288.

Inwood, Brad, The Poem of Empedocles. A Text and Translation with an Introduction, Phoenix Presocratics, Vol. III, Toronto : University of Toronto Press 1992 (the second revised edition, Toronto - Buffalo - London : University of Toronto Press 2001).

– Empedocles Fragments, in: The Times Literary Supplement, Jul. 9, 1999, p. 17 (Pap. Strasb.).

– Empedocles, in: Encyclopedia of Classical Philosophy, ed. by D. J. Zeyl - D. T. Devereux - P. T. Mitsis, Westport (Conn.) : Greenwood Press - London - Chicago (Ill.) : Fitzroy Deaborn 1997, p. 203-6.

– Review of A. Martin - O. Primavesi, Empedocles - A. Martin, O. Primavesi : L'Empédocle de Strasbourg [...] 1998, in: The Classical Review 50.1, 2000, p. 5-7.

– Who do we think ‘We’ are?, in: The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, ed. by Burkhard Reis, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. 230-243. B 112, B 115, B 129.

– Empedocles and metempsychôsis: The critique of Diogenes of Oenoanda, p. 71-86, in: Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Dorothea Frede - Reis Burkhard, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2009.

Irby-Massie, Georgia L., Prometheus Bound and contemporary trends in Greek natural philosophy, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 48, 2008, p. 137-157. (B6.)  http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/911/991

Iribarren, Leopoldo, Rationalisations de la croyance : La construction de la pistis comme philosophème chez Parménide et Empédocle, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXIV(1), 2006, p. 63-82.

– Les peintres d‘Empédocle (DK 31 B23) : enjeux et portée d'une analogie préplatonicienne, in: Philosophie antique, 13, 2013, p. 83-115. (B 23.)

JJJ

Jackson, Henry, On Empedocles apud Sextum Empiricum Adv. Math. VII.123, in: Proceedings of the Cambridge philological Society, 61, 1902, p. 4-5. (B2, B3.)

– On Empedocles, fragment 17, in: Proceedings of the Cambridge philological Society, 76, 1907, p. 6. (B 17.)

Jacobson, Howard, Lucretius’ Hunting Souls (3, 726-728), in: Museum Helveticum 56, 1999, p. 33. (B 58.)

– Empedocles’ Cain, in: Museum Helveticum 59, 2002, p. 12 (on parallelism between B 115 and Gen. 4.3-15).

Jacquemard, Simonne, Trois mystiques grecs: Orphée, Pythagore, Empédocle, Paris : Michel 1997.

Jaeckel, Johannes Friedrich, De poetarum Siculorum hexametro (diss.), Leipzig 1902 (an important comparative analysis of verses Emp. and the other poets; B 100.3, B 29.3; useful statistics).

Jaeger, Werner, The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1947, p. 128-54. (in German: Die Theologie der frühen griechischen Denker, 1953)

– Das Pneuma im Lykeion, in: Hermes 48, 1913, p. 29-74, p. 53-4. (A 74.)

– Diokles von Karystos. Die griechische Medizin und die Schule des Aristoteles, Berlin 1938. (A 34, A 742.)

– The Greek Ideas of Immortality, in: Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 52, 3, 1959, p. 135-147. (Pages 141-142: Empedoclean conception of soul - very traditionaly meant - in the contemporary context; B 117, B 119.)

Jakubanis, Geirich, Empedokl. Filosof, vrač i čarodej, dannyja dlja ego ponimanija i ocenki [Empedocles philosopher, doctor and wonder/worker, evidence for his interpretation and evaluation], in: Kijevskija universitetskaja izvestija 7 (ijul), 1905, p. 1-136 (reprinted in Kiev 1906 and in Moscow 19832; republished again under title Lukrecij, O prirode veščej II: Stati, kommentariji, fragmenty Epikura i Empedokla, ed. by F. A. Petrovskij, Moskva 1947, p. 663-95; cf. also Empédocle, fragments des poèmes De la nature et Purifications [partly translated, revisioned and commented by M. L. Gasparov], in: Lucrèce 1983, p. 275-91 and 372-6 (very general study and the translation of fragments according to Mullach’s edition).

Janko, Richard, Hesychius Θ 216 and Empedocles Fragment 21.6, in: Classical Philology 81, 1986, p. 308-9. (B 21.6.)

– Empedocles, On Nature I 233-364: a New Reconstruction of P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1165-6, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 150, 2004, p. 1-26.

– Empedocles’ Physica Book 1: A New Reconstruction, in: The Empedoclean kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 93-136.

– Review of Empedokles Physika I. Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. By Oliver Primavesi. Berlin: De Gruyter 2008, in: Ancient Philosophy, volume 30, 2, Fall 2010, p. 407-411.

Jannaccone, Sylvia, Una reminiscenza dei  Καθαρμοί nel carme 64 di Catullo, in: Giornale italiano di filologia 18, 1965, p. 127-30 (B 115.10).

Janssen, Tjitte H., Νημερτής τ᾿ ἐρόεσσα μελάγκουρός τ᾿ ᾿Ασάφεια, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 104, 1987, p. 177-8 (B 122.4).

Jiráni, Otakar, Sallustiova báseň Empedoclea [Sallust’s Poem on Empedocles], in: Listy filologické 31, 1904, p. 14-21 (A 27).

Jobst, Franz Xaver, Über das Verhältnis von Lucretius und Empedokles (diss.), München : M. Steinebach 1907.

Joël, Karl, Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Band I, Tübingen 1921, p. 488-565.

Johnstone, Henry W., Empedocles’ Περὶ Φύσεως and Καθαρμοί (Bryn Mawr Greek Commentaries), Bryn Mawr (Pennsylvania) : Bryn Mawr College 1985.

Jones, Howard, Lucretius and Nature’s Monsters, in: Helmantica 44, 1993, p. 199-203 (marginally on B 61). 

Jouanna, Jacques, Présence d’Empédocle dans la Collection Hippocratique, in: Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé 20, 1961, p. 452-63.

– La théorie de l’intelligence et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique ‘Du régime’: Ses rapports avec Empédocle et le ‘Timée’ de Platon, in: Revue des études grecques 79, 1966, p. xv-xviii.

– L'interprétation des rêves et la théorie micro-macrocosmique dans le traité hippocratique Du régime: sémiotique et mimesis, in: Klaus-Dietrich Fischer – Diethard Nickel – Paul Potter (eds.), Text and Tradition. Studies in Ancient Medicine and its Transmission Presented to Jutta Kollesch, Leiden: Brill, 1998, p. 161-174, p. 172-173. (DK 31 B 100: ad Hüffmeier and the Hippocratics.)

– La théorie de la sensation, de la pensée et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique du Régime: ses rapports avec Empédocle et le Timée de Platon, in: AION (Annali dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 29, 2007, p. 9–39.

– The Theory of Sensation, Thought and the Soul in the Hippocratic Treatise Regimen: Its Connections with Empedocles and Plato’s Timaeus, in: J. Jouanna, Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen. Selected Papers, translated by N. Allies, Leiden - Boston: Brill 2012, p. 195-228.

Jourdan, Fabienne, Manger Dionysos - L'interprétation du mythe du démembrement par Plutarque a-t-elle été lue par les néo-Platoniciens ?, in: Pallas, 67, 2005, p. 153-174. B 115, De esu 996 b-c.

Journée, Gérard, "Rien ne saurait naître de rien" - L'émergence du problème de l'être dans la philosophie pré-platonicienne, Thèse de Doctorat de l'Université Lille IIII, janvier 2007, p. 468-520. 

http://documents.univ-lille3.fr/files/pub/www/recherche/theses/JOURNEE_Gerard.pdf . (B 8, B 11, B 12, B 15.)

– Empédocle, B6 DK : Remarques sur les deux lignées de Diels, in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, vol. VI nº11, 2012, p. 32-62. On-line: http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/41/544 . (B 6.)

Judet de La Combe, Pierre, Abstraction et récit dans le poème thébain de Stésichore, in: Poésie et lyrique antiques, ed. L. Dubois, Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 1996, p. 11-27.  (La réplique de Jocaste. Philotès, Neîkos.)

– L’Agamemnon d’Eschyle: Commentaire des dialogues, II, Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 2001, p. 555-8 (B 112.6, B 115.3 and 13, B 137; on mutual influence Emp. and Aesch.).

Jurado López, Manuel, No es mal momento para recordar a Empédocles, pp. 33-35, in: Los dioses vulnerables. Sevilla: Algaida 2008. (Algaida poesía; 60.)

KKK

Kafka, Gustav, Empedokles von Akragas, in : G. Kafka, Die Vorsokratiker, Geschichte der Philosophie in Einzeldarstellungen. Abt. II. Die Philosophie des Abendlandes im Altertum Band 6, München : E. Reinhadt 1921, p. 84-103 (plus notes on p. 156-159).

– Zur Physik des Empedokles, in: Philologus 78, 1923, p. 202-229.

– Zu Theophrasts De sensu, in: Philologus 72, 1913, p. 65-82 (B 99).

Kahle, Madayo, OF 437 and the Transformation of the Soul, in: Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic Fragments in Honour of Alberto Bernabé, ed. Miguel Herrero de Jáurequi et alii, Berlin - Boston: De Gruyter 2011, p. 153-157. (P. 156: B 115.47-58, daimon; a very brief notice.)

Kahn, Charles H., Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology, New York 1960.

– Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42, 1960, s. 3-35 (Reprint in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. J. P. Anton -  G. L. Kustas, Albany: SUNY 1971, p. 3-38, with appendix 'Empedocles among the Shamans' omitted latter. A revised version of the article was published in: The Pre-Socratics, ed. A. P. D. Mourelatos, Doubleday/Anchor Press 1974, then Princeton University Press 1993, p. 426-456).

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle Vol. I, in: Gnomon 41, 1969, p. 439-47 (important).

– Empedocles, in: MacMillan’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. II. London 1969, p. 496-9.

– Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. A Brief History, Indianapolis–Cambridge : Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 2001, p. 17-18 (E. appears as an inspired but idiosyncratic follower of Pythagoras), p. 24-25 (Harmonia, B 96).

Kaibel, Georg, Die Prolegomena Περὶ κωμῳδίας, in: Abhandlungen der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologische - historische Klasse, Neue Folge Band 2, Nr. 4, Berlin, Weidmann 1898, p. 3-70, p. 20-1. (A 251.)

Kalderon, Mark Eli, Form without Matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on Color Perception, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015. (B 8, B 21, B 23, B 71, B 84, B 94, B 96. The bibliography concerning Empedocles in this book does not go farther than 2009, and is quite exclusively in English. As of 2000 only four names: Baltussen 2000, Ierodiakonou 2005, Inwood 2001, Kamtekar 2009, No Greek, just translations by Inwood,)

Kalogerakos, Ioannis G., Seele und Unsterblichkeit. Untersuchungen zur Vorsokratik bis Empedokles, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, Band 52, Stuttgart - Leipzig: Teubner 1996, p. 268-329.

Kamtekar, Rachana, Knowing by likeness in Empedocles, in: Phronesis 54 (3), 2009, p. 215-238. (B 2, B 3, B 17, B 22, B 23, B 55, B 71, B 73, B 79, B 82, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 106, B 109, B 110.)

Karfík, Filip, L’âme du monde : Platon, Anaxagore, Empédocle, in: Études platoniciennes, 11, 2014, p. 1-23, [on-line in April 2015]  http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/572  (B 134.)

Karsten, Simon, Empedoclis Agrigentini carminum reliquiae, de vita ejus et studiis disseruit, fragmenta explicuit, philosophiam illustravit, Amstelodami: J. Müller 1838. (In Google books.)

Katsch, Julius Ferdinand, Medizinische Quellenstudien. Entwickelungsgang des Aehnlichkeitsaximos von Empedokles bis auf Hahnermann, Stuttgart : Metzler 1891 (133 p.; the position of Emp. in the history of the medicine).

Kearns, Emily, ‘Remembering the Ancient Way of Life’: Primitivism in Greek Sacrificial Ritual, in: Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras: History without Historians, ed. by J. Marincola, L. Llewellyn-Jones and C. Maciver, Edinburgh University Press 2012, p. 301-316. (Empedocles: p. 308-310, B 128.)

Kelesidou, L., Εμπεδοκλης Ακραγαντίνος, Αθήνα 2002.

Kelly, Paul Joseph, Empedocles and Teilhard, in: The Teilhard Review 6/2, 1971-2, s. 76-83.

Kenny, Anthony, Life after Etna: The Legend of Empedocles in Literary Tradition, in: The Empedoclean kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 17-30.

– From Empedocles to Wittgenstein: historical essays in philosophy, Oxford : Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2008. (Life after Etna : Empedocles in prose and poetry.)

Kerényi, Károly, Pythagoras und Orpheus, in: Aufsätze zur Geschichte der Antike und des Christentums, ed. F. Altheim, K. Kerenyi, H. Russel, W. Iwanow, P. Vignaux, K. Schmid, Berlin, p. 16–49 (= K. Kerényi, Humanistische Seelenforschung, Stuttgart 1996, 14–41), See also: K. Kerényi, Pythagoras und Orpheus, Amsterdam 1940. And K. Kerényi, Pythagoras und Orpheus, Dritte, erweiterte Ausgabe, Zürich: Rhein Verlag 1950.

Kerferd, George Briscoe, Review of H. A. T. Reiche, 1960, Harald A. T. Reiche : Empedocles' Mixture, Eudoxan Astronomy and Aristotle's Connate Pneuma, in: Classical Review, 12 (1), 1962, p. 93-94.

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. i, 1965, A new approach to Empedocles, in: Classical Review, 17 (2), 1967, p. 147-149.

– Review of D. O’Brien, ECC, 1969, D. O'Brien : Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle, in: Classical Review, 21 (2), 1971, p. 176-178.

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. ii and iii, 1969, Jean Bollack : Empédocle. ii Les Origines, iii Commentaire i-ii, in: Classical Review, 22 (3), 1972, p. 325-327.

– Review of N. van der Ben, 1975, N. van der Ben, The Proem of Empedocles' Peri Physios, in: Classical Review, 28 (1), 1978, p. 167-168.

– Gorgias and Empedocles, in: Siculorum gymnasium 38, 1985, p. 595-605.

Kerkhoff, Manfred, Empédocle et Zarathustra: Sept versions de la mor libre, in: Études philosophiques 4, 1992, s. 539-54.

Kern, Otto, De Orphei Epimenidis Pherecydis theogoniis quaestiones criticae (diss.), Berolini 1888, p. 11-2 (A 501).

– Empedokles und die Orphiker, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1, 1888, p. 498-508 (published also separately as a Sonderabdruck aus d. AGPh, 12 p.).

Kerschensteiner, Jula, Kosmos. Quellenkritische Untersuchungen zu den Vorsokratikern, München : C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung 1962, s. 124-40 (B 26, B 27, B 28, B 134, B 135, A 32, A 58 etc.).

Kertsch, Manfred, Philologische Notizen zu Gregor von Nazianz, in: Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 29, 1980, p. 1-7 (cf. A 165).

Ketterer, David, Empedocles in Eureka - Addenda, in: Poe Studies Dark Romanticism, Vol.18 issue 2, 1985.

Keuls, Eva C., The Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Classical Antiquity, Amsterdam 1974. (p. 22 et passim.)

Kingsley, Peter, On the Teaching of Empedocles (unpublished diss.), Cambridge University 1979.

– The Greek Origin of the Sixth-Century Dating of Zoroaster, in: Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 53, 1990, p. 245-65.

– Empedocles in Armenian, in: Revue des études arméniennes 24, 1993, p. 47-57 (A 491).

– Empedocles and his interpreters: The four-element Doxography, in: Phronesis 39, 1994, s. 235-54.

– Empedocles’ sun, in: Classical Quarterly 44, 1994, p. 316-24. (A 561, A 30, B 44.)

– From Pythagoras to the Turba philosophorum: Egypt and Pythagorean Tradition, in: Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 57, 1994, p. 1-13.

– Greeks, Shamans and Magi, in: Studia Iranica 23, 1994, p. 187-98. (B 111.)

– Notes on air: four questions of meaning in Empedocles and Anaxagoras, in: Classical Quarterly 45, 1995, p. 26-29. (B 38.3-4, B 78, A 49.)

– Artillery and Prophecy: Sicily in the reign of Dionysus I, in: Prometheus 21, 1995, p. 15-23.

– Meetings with Magi: Iranian Themes among the Greeks, from Xanthus of Lydia to Plato’s Academy, in: Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 5, 1995, p. 173-209.

– Empedocles’ two poems, in: Hermes 124, 1996, p. 108-11.

– Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic. Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition, Oxford : Clarendon Press 1995 (19972, 20013). This book has been translated several times: Empédocle et la tradition pythagoricienne, by Les Belles Lettres (2010), Archaia philosophia mystêria kai mageia, by Archetypo Publishing (2001), Antik Felsefe, Gizem ve Büyü, by Kabalci Yayinevi (2002), Misteri e magia nella filosofia antica, by Il Saggiatore and Mondolibri (2007), Filosofía antigua, misterios y magia, by Ediciones Atalanta (2008).

– In the dark places of wisdom, Inverness (Ca.): Golden Sufi Center, 1999. (Fr. 146: pp. 231-232.)

– Αρχαία φιλοσοφία, μυστήρια και μαγεία : ο Εμπεδοκλής και η πυθαγόρεια παράδοση, μτφρ. Φ. Τερζάκης, Θεσσαλονίκη : Αρχέτυπο, 2001.

– Antik Felsefe Gizem ve Büyü Pythagoras ve Empedokles Geleneği,Istanbul: Kabalcı 2002.

– Empedocles for the new millennium, in: Ancient Philosophy 22, 2002, p. 333-413. Published in Greek as a book by Archetypo (Thessaloniki, 2008).

– Sowers of eternity, in: Reality, Inverness (California): The Golden Sufi Center 2003, p. 309-559 (text) et 586-91 (notices). German version as Reality by Crotona Verlag. 2012.  Greek version, as Archaiohellenikê skepsê kai dytikos politismos, by Dioptra Publishing. Slovenian vesrsion as Resnicnost, by Kud Logos . https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/peter-kingsley

– Misteri e magia nella filosofia antica: Empedocle e la tradizione pitagorica, Milano: Il Saggiatore 2007, (La Cultura).

Huffman, Carl A., The Pythagorean Tradition, in: A. A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge 1999, pp. 66-87, p. 75-78 (Emp. as a Pythagorean; B 137, B 115, B 112).

– Aristoxenus’ Pythagorean Precepts: A Rational Pythagorean Ethic, in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa : Edizione della Normale 2006, pp. 103-121, p. 108, n. 4 (A 95).

Hüffmeier, F., Phronesis in den Schriften des Corpus Hippocraticum, in: Hermes 189, 1961, s. 1-84, Part III: Phronesis in der Schrift „De Victu“, p. 68-84, p. 71-74. (DK 31 B 100: the author of De victu supposes the breathing by means of skin as just Empedocles did.)

– Hesiod and Empedocles, in: Classical Journal 65, 1970, p. 145-61.

– Plutarch as a Source for Empedocles Re-examined, in: American Journal of Philology 92, 1971, p. 156-84.

– Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Empedocles Re-examined, in: Phronesis 18.2, p. 97-114, and 18.3 187-203, 1973.

– The Idea of Strife in Early Greek Thought, in: The Personalist 55, 1974, p. 205-15.

– Empedoclean Influences on the Timaeus, in: Phoenix 28, 2, 1974, p. 145-66.

Heyne, Christian Gottlob, “Vorrede“, in: Dieterich Tiedemann, System der stoischen Philosophie, Erster Theil, Leipzig: Bey Weidmanns Erben und Reich 1776, p. III–XVIII. (Pages VIII-IX: B6; Nestis: Persephone; Aïdôneus: earth.)

Hild, Joseph-Antoine,  Étude sur les démons dans la littérature et la religion des Grecs, Paris: Hachette 1881. (Empedocles : p. 228-234.)

Hladký, Vojtěch, Vítkův Empedoklés, in: Souvislosti 3–4, 53-54, 2002, p. 194-202. (A review of Tomáš Vítek's Empedocles, vol. I.) http://www.souvislosti.cz/3402/hla.html 

– Empedokleův Sfairos, in: Filosofický časopis 3/54, 2006, p. 393-410. (In Czech, English summary.)

– Empedokleův Sfairos očima antických interpretů, in: Listy filologické (Folia philologica), 2008, 131, 1, p. 379-439. (Language: CZECH. See an English abstract : http://lf.clavmon.cz/  . A recent English translation of the whole text by Anna Pilátová can be supplied by Vojtěch Hladký on demand - vojtechhladky@gmail.com - or by empedocles.acragas.)

– Reinkarnující se duše mezi Presokratiky a Platónem, in: Reflexe 38, 2010, p. 19-34. (Empedocles : p. 22-24.)

– Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, I: Aristotle and the neoplatonists, in: Eirene, 50, 1-2, 2014, p. 149-164.

– Empedocles' Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, II: Plato's Timaeus and Statesman, in: Eirene, 51, 2015, p. 71-98.

Hladký, Vojtěch et alii, Evoluce před Darwinem [Evolution before Darwin], Praha: Pavel Mervart, 2012, p. 71-86. (Chap. Empedocles: The cycle of life; a partly popular, partly original interpretation of E. zoology in the context of his cosmology; the text is written in Czech, summary is absent.) 

Hoessly, Fortunat, 2.4. Empedokles, in: Katharsis: Reinigung als Heilverfahren, Studien zum Ritual der archaischen und klassischen Zeit sowie zum Corpus Hippocraticum, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2001, (Hypomnemata, Bd. 135), p. 188-197.

Hoffmann-Luss, Herbert, Die Widergabe der Empedokleischen Physik durch Aristoteles (diss.), Götingen 1966.

Hollenberg, Wilhelm, Empedoclea, in: Jahresbericht über das Königliche Joachimsthalsche Gymnasium, Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1853, p. 1-31 (De prooemio Empedoclis: p. 1-17, De cognoscendi facultate: p. 17-31).

Hölscher, Uvo, Weltzeiten und Lebenzyklus: eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie, in: Hermes 93, 1965, p. 7-33 (= reprinted in U. Hölscher, Anfängliches Fragen: Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen: 1968, p. 173-212).

– Empedokles und Hölderlin, Frankfurt am Main : Insel 1965 (the second actualized edition was published like Schriften der Hölderlin-Gesellschaft 21, Eggingen : Isele 1998).

– Anfängliches Fragen. Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen 1968, p. 173-212.

– Der Sinn von Sein in der älteren griechischen Philosophie, in: Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften 3/1976, Heidelberg 1976.

– Heraklit über göttliche und menschliche Weisheit, in: Aleida Assmann (ed.), Weisheit. Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation III, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag 1991, p. 73-80, p. 77-78 (concise notices on B 3.3, B 2.9, B 113, B 112.4-5).

Holwerda, Douwe, Commentatio de vocis quae est φύσις vi atque usu praesertim in Graecitate Aristotele anteriore, Groningae 1955.

–Zu Empedokles fr. 20 D-K, in: Mnemosyne 4/50, 1997, p. 320-1. (B 20.)

Hommel, Hildebrecht, Cetera mitte, zu Archilochus, Horaz, Euripides und Empedokles, in: Gymnasium 58, 1951, p. 218-27.

Hooykaas, Reijer, Het begrip element in zijn historisch-wijsgerige ontwikkeling, Diss. Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1933.

Horna,  Constantinus, Empedocleum, in: Wiener Studien 48, 1930, p. 3-11 (B 134, B 29, A 1, par. 77, A 2, B 160.)

Heinimann, Felix, Nomos und Physis. Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im Griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, Basel : Verlag Friedrich Reinhardt AG, 1945, p. 48-9, 84-5, 89-90, 153 (B 9), 89-90, 153 (B 8), 85 (B 17.22: νομίζεσθαι), 91-2 (B 63).

Herrero de Jáuregui, Miguel, Salvation for the Wanderer: Odysseus, the Gold Leaves, and Empedocles, in: Philosophy and Salvation in Greek Religion, ed. V. Adluri, Berlin - Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013 (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 60). (B 3, B 20, B 23, B 84, B 112, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.)

Hershbell, Jackson P., Empedocles’ oral Style, in: Classical Journal 63, 1968, p. 352-7.

Gerke, Hans, Sprache und Stil des Empedokles (diss.), Götingen 1953.

Gernet, Louis, Recherches sur le développement de la pensée juridique et morale en Grèce : étude sémantique, Paris: Ernest Leroux 19171 (2nd edition, Paris: Albin Michel 2001², with new pagination). (B 115 : p. 39 [p. 55], 47 [63], 312 [313], 316 [317], B 121 : 242 [246], B 144 : 242 [246].)

Γεωργακέλλος, Νίκος Ι, Εμπεδοκλής - υπό το πρίσμα των φυσικών επιστημών, Αθήνα, Ευρασία, 2008. 

Gheerbrant, Xavier, Qui sont les destinataires du fragment 3 d'Empédocle ? in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, vol. VI nº11, 2012, p. 78-98. 

On-line: http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/334/547. (B 3.)

– Poésie et Argumentation dans les fragments des deux poèmes d'Empédocle, Thesis for Docteur en Langue et Littérature grecques, Université de Lille 3, October 2014.  (B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17 + ensemble a, B 20 + ensemble c, B 21, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 84, B 86, B 100, B 112 (vv. 1-4), B 114, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131, fr. 509 Bollack.)

Ghidini - Tortorelli, Marisa, Instanze utopiche nel mito dell’età dell’oro. Ricerca su alcuni frammenti di Empedocle, in: Atti dell’Accademia Pontaniana 20, 1970-1, p. 155-72 (N.S. XX, 1971, pp. 1-18).

Giannantoni, Gabriele, Review of Jean Bollack, Empédocle, I Introduction à l'ancienne physique, 1965, in: Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 95, 1967, p. 331-335.

– 31. Empedocle, in: I presocratici: testimonianze e frammenti. Bari: Laterza, 1969, (Biblioteca Universale), p. 323-421. (Translation of Diels-Kranz 1951, with foot notes.)

– Empedocle: mito e realtà, in: La cultura filosofica della Magna Grecia, Messina 1989, p. 43-62.

– L’originalità del pluralismo empedocleo, in: Elenchos 18, 1997, p. 235-55.

– L’interpretazione aristotelica di Empedocle, in: Elenchos 19/2, 1998, p. 361-411. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997, p. 217-411.)

Giardina, G.R., Empedocle e gli Empedoclei sui condotti vuoti, pp. 142-144, in: La chimica fisica di Aristotele : teoria degli elementi e delle loro proprietà : analisi critica del De generatione et corruptione. Roma : Aracne. 2008. (Scienze storiche, filosofiche, pedagogiche e psicologiche; 285.)

Gigandet, Alain, Plutarque contre Colotès contre Empédocle, in: Aitia 3, 2013 [on-line :  http://aitia.revues.org/636 ], p. 2-10. (A 34, A 44, A 48, B 8, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 19, B 21, B 35.)

Gigante, Marcello, Attendendo Empedocle. Un’insidia al recupero del testo autentico, in: Studi Italiani di filologia classica 15, 1997, p. 131-4 (Pap. Strasb. aII.26 and 30, c 1-2 = B 20, B 2.1, B 100.1-2).

Gigon, Olof, Zum antiken Begriff der Harmonie, in: Studium Generale 19, 1966, p. 539-47.

Gilbert, Otto, Die Meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1907. (Chap. V: Empedokles, p. 105-124; B 6, B 21)

– Spekulation und Volksglaube in der ionischen Philosophie, in: Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 13, 1910, p. 306-32. 

– Griechische Religionsphilosophie, Leipzig 1911, p. 197-225.

Gill, Christopher, La psychologie présocratique: quelques questions interprétatives, in: Les anciens savants: études sur les philosophies préplatoniciennes réunies par Pierre-Marie Morel et Jean-François Pradeau, (Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, Tome 12), Université Marc Bloch, Strasbourg 2001, p. 169-89.

Giombini Stefania, review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, de Rossetti L., e C. Santaniello, in: Nova Tellus 28.2, 2010. http://redalyc.org.www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59120919014

Giordani, Pietro, Review of Scinà, Memorie (1813), in: Biblioteca Italiana 1, 1816, p. 322-33, 2, p. 15-21, 4, p. 247-59 = P. Giordani, Opere, a cura di A. Gussalli, Milano 1857, X.14-37 (p. 25-7: B 100).

Giraldi (Gyraldus), Giglio Gregorio, Historiae poetarum tam Graecorum quam Latinorum dialogi decem, Basileae 1545, Dialogus III, p. 296-9 (a concise biography of Emp. with the quotation B 112.4 and B 117; the main source is evidently DL).

Gkarani, Myrto, see Garani, Myrto.

Gladisch, August, Empedokles und die alten Aegypter, in: Jahrbücher für speculative Philosophie und die philosophische Bearbeitung der empirischen Wissenschaften 2/4, 1847, s. 681-725 and 5/2, p. 903-44 (this is repeated more fully in 1858).

– Empedokles und die Aegypter. Eine historische Untersuchung von A. G., mit Erläuterungen aus den Aegyptischen Denkmälern von Dr. Heinrich Brugsch und Joseph Passalacqua, Leipzig : J. C. Hinrichs 1858 (very fantastic und improbable identification of Empedoclean teaching with Egyptian beliefs; some textual suggestions).

– Das mystische vierspeichige Rad bei den alten Aegyptern und Hellenen, in: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 15/2, 1861, p. 406-9.

Gladigow, Burkhard, Zum Makarismos des Weisen, in: Hermes 95, 1967, p. 403-33 (B 132, B 129).

Goebel, Karl, Empedokles, in: Die vorsokratische Philosophie, Bonn: Carl Georgi 1910, p. 191-226.

Golosovker, J., Empedokl iz Agrigenta, in: Gelděrlin, F., Smerť Empedokla, Moskva - Leningrad 1931.

Gomperz, Theodor, Griechische Denker. Eine Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Leipzig 1903, I.183-204 (engl. transl. Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy, Bristol 1996 (19051), I.227-54).

– Herculanische Notizen, in: Wiener Studien 2, 1880, p. 139-42, p. 140 (B 100.1-2).

– Zu Empedokles, in: Hermes 31, 1896, p. 469-71 (plenty of textual suggestions).

– Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung griechischen Schriftsteler, in: Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 152, 1906, p. 1-31, p. 14-5 (the author attempts to identify the supposed Empedoclean fragment).

González Escudero, Santiago, Raíces y elementos en Empédocles, in: El Basilisco, 1st collection, 13, 1981-82, p. 62-9.   http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/bas11306.htm ,   http://www.filosofia.org/ave/001/a297.htm , http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/pdf/bas11306.pdf . (B 6)

Goto (後藤), Jun (淳), エンペドクレス哲学において思惟性と生命性を担うフレーン [Φρήν carrying the thoughtfulness and vitality in Empedocles' philosophy], in: 東亜大学紀要, no.12, 2010, p. 25-39. This article can be read on the web with an abstract in English. Link found with the address of the author: jung510@toua-u.ac.jp. (B 134.)

Goulet, Richard, s. v. Empédocle, in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Tome III, ed. R. Goulet, Paris : C.N.R.S.-Éditions 2000, p. 66-88.

Goytisolo, Juan, Las chinelas de Empédocles, pp 354-391, in: Obras completas, I. Barcelona : Galaxia Gutenberg : Círculo de Lectores. 2005. (Opera mundi.)

Grabowski, Franz, Empedokles und Leukipp-Demokrit, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Anaxagoras (diss.), Breslau : Hochschulverlag 1923.

Graf, Fritz, Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenistischer Zeit, Berlin - New York 1974.

Graham, Daniel W., Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle, in: Classical Quarterly 38, 1988, p. 297-312.

– Empedocles and Anaxagoras: Responses to Parmenides, in: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. by A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 159-80.

– La lumière de la lune dans la pensée grecque archaïque, in: Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique?, ed. A. Laks - C. Louguet, Lille, 2002, p. 351-80.

– The topology and dynamics of Empedocles’ cycle, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 225-44.

– Explaining the cosmos: the Ionian tradition of scientific philosophy, Princeton / Oxford : Princeton University Press, 2006. (B8, B9, B11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, , B 36, B 62, B 96, B 98).

– The texts of early Greek philosophy: the complete fragments and selected testimonies of the major presocratics, Part I, Cambridge : University Press, 2010.

Grammatico, Giuseppina, L'immaginario empedocleo, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, p. 48-70.

Gregory, Andrew, Empedocles, in: Ancient Greek Cosmogony, London: Bloomsbury 2007, p. 78-101. (Chap. 5. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. Interesting focus on chance in cosmogony and zoogony. “The kosmoi generated by the cycle are not identical, and the differences are down to chance”. B 8, B 12, B 13, B 14, 17, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 62, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 103, B 104, B 124, a(i) 6, a(ii) 17.)

– Empedocles, in: The Presocratics and the Supernatural: Magic, Philosophy and Science in Early Greece, London: Bloomsbury 2013. p. 167-184. (Ch. 9. Empedocles’ ontology, meteorology, cosmogony, zoogony. Love and Strife. Empedocles’ gods. Empedocles’ magic? Empedocles as a shaman? Empedocles’ claims. Metempsychosis. Empedocles and Homer. It is possible to have a view of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle where there are only natural entities and processes. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. B 111. B 112.)

Grmek, M.D., La légende et la réalité de la nocivité des fèves, in: HPLS 2, 1980, p. 61-121. (B 140.)

Grilli, Alberto, Lucrezio tra poesia e filosofia, in: Annali del liceo G. Garibaldi di Palermo 14-16, 1977-1979, p. 197-216 (Lucretius was inspired mainly by Homer, Hesiod, Emp. and Ennius).

Grimal, Edmonde, A propos d’un passage du Ménon, une définition “tragique” de la couleur, in: Revue des études grecques 55, 1942, p. 1-13 (A 921).

Grottanelli, Cristiano., Healers and Saviours of the Eastern Mediterranean in Pre-Classical Times, in: La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell’Impero Romano, a cura di U. Bianchi - M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden 1982, p. 649-70.

Grotius, Hugo, Dicta poetarum quae apud Jo. Stobaeum exstant. Emendata et latino carmine reddita ab H. G. Plutarchi et Basilii Magni de usu Graecorum poetarum libelli, Parisiis : N. Buon 1623 (16252), p. 152 (B 6), 166 (B 105) and 170 (B 115.1-2).

Grünwald, Michael, Die Anfänge der abendländischen Philosophie. Fragmente der Vorsokratikern. Mit einer Einführung von M. Laura Gemelli Marciano, (Bibliothek der Antike), Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Artemis Verlag 1991, p. 121-44 (an extensive translation of B fragments and A testimonies) and 225-30 (notices).

Gruppe, Otto, Griechische Mythologie und Religionsgeschichte, Band I-II, München 1903-6, I.429 (B 6) and II.1044 (Empedocles as a magician).

Guglielmino, F[rancesco?], Empedocle, in: Tradizione 1939.

Guthrie, William Keith Chambers, The presocratic world-picture, in: The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 45, n°2, 1952 (April), p. 87-104. (Empedocles: p. 93, 98-102, some remarks on Empedocles´ theory of soul, daimones, cosmos.) http://www.upf.edu/materials/fhuma/hiid1/mat/txt/guthrie.pdf

 – The Greeks and their Gods, Boston : Beacon Press, 1954 (First edition : 1950). Pp. 309-325 : Orphism and Empedocles.

 – Orpheus and Greek religion : a study of the orphic movement, Princeton (N.J) : Princeton University Press, 1993 (reprint with foreword of 1952²). P. 169 : B 115, B 146-147. P.175 : B 112, B 117.  P.197 : B 128, B 136, B 137. Pp. 231-232.

 –  In the Beginning: Some Greek views on the origins of life and the early state of man, London: Methuen & Co 1957. (P. 42-45, 72-73 ; B 61, B 62; B 128.)

–  A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. II, The presocratic tradition from Parmenides to Democritus, Cambridge - London - New York: Cambridge University Press 1965, p. 122-265.

Guzzo, Augusto, Empedocle d’Agrigento, Palermo, Presso l’Accademia, 1964.

HHH

Habermehl, P[eter?], Empedokles, in: Metzler Philosophen Lexicon, hrsg. von B. Luty, Stuttgart : Metzler 1989, p. 217-9. 

Hadot, Pierre, Qu'est-ce que la philosophie antique ?, Paris: Gallimard 1995. (P. 276-277: B 129; p. 278: B 132.) 

Hahm, David E., The Origins of Stoic Cosmology, Colombus: Ohio State University Press, 1977. (B 6, B 8, B 17, B 38, B 62, B 73.)

Halbertsma, Klaas Tjalling Agnus, Over den wijsgeer Empedokles, in: Hermeneus 21, 1949, p. 3-9, 22-6 and 62-8.

Halbwachs, Maurice, La représentation de l´âme chez les Grecs: le double corporel et le double spirituel, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 37/4, 1930, pp. 493-534. (Emp. p. 518-519.)

Hall, Alexander, E. W., Dating the Homeric Hymn to Selene: Evidence and Implications, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 53, 2013, p. 15-30. (Moon, B 45.)

Halleux, Robert, Le problème des métaux dans la science antique, Paris : Les Belles Lettres 1974, (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, fasc. 209), Presses universitaires de Liège & OpenEdition Books 2013. (Chapitre I. Les présocratiques : http://books.openedition.org/pulg/967 A 34, A 89, B 91, B 92.)

Hallier, Aemilius [Emil], Lucreti carmina e fragmentis Empedoclis adumbrata (diss.), Ienae : Typis Maukii 1857 (39 p.). 

Ham, Charles Tyler, Empedoclean elegy: love, strife and the four elements in Ovid’s amores, ars amatoria and fasti, Thesis in classical studies, University of Pennsylvania, 2013. 

Hamblenne, P., Au Salluste inconnu, in: Revue Belge de philologie et d’histoire 59, 1981, p. 60-70 (A 20).

Hanf, Roland, Begriffliches Denken bei Empedokles [diss., Kiel?] 2000.

Hankinson, R. J., Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998, p. 45-9 (Empedocles: structure and emergence; B 12, B 15, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 98.).

Hardie, Alex, Empedocles and the Muse of the Agathos Logos, in: American Journal of Philology, Volume 134, Number 2, 2013, p. 209-246. (B 3, B 4, Β 23, B 110, B 131, B 133, B 134.)

Hardie, Philip Russel, The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos, in: Classical Quarterly 45, 1995, p. 204-214.

Harris, William Vernon.,  Dreams and Experience in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge (Mass.) - London: Harvard University Press, 2009, p. 237-240. (Empedocles and his theory of dreams, ad B 108.)

Harrison, Jane Ellen, The Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, Cambridge 1908.

Haussleiter, Johannes, Der Vegetarismus in der Antike, Berlin, Verlag von Alfred Töpelmann, 1935, p. 157-63 et passim (the passage on Empedocles is strongly dependent on Diels’ translations of fragments and Wilamowitz’s commentaries in SPAW 1929 and it is not very informative).

Heath, Thomas L., Aristarchus of Samos: the ancient Copernicus. A history of Greek astronomy to Aristarchus together with Aristarchus's treatise [...], Oxford: Clarendon Press 1913. (Empedocles:  p. 86-93, reprint in Greek in 2005 below.)

– Αρίσταρχος ο Σάμιος, ο αρχαίος Κοπέρνικος, μτφρ. Θ. Γραμμένος, Αθήνα : Κέντρο Έρευνας Επιστήμης και Εκπαίδευσης [«Κ.Ε.ΕΠ.ΕΚ.»], 2005. Pp. 82-89 («Εμπεδοκλής»).

Hedericus, Beniamin, Sphaera Empedoclis, notis, cum suis, tum Q. Septimii Florentis Christiani, illustrata, ad orationes de astronomiae instauribus... invitat B. H., Typ. J. Ridelii, Dresdae 1711 (B 161).

Heerkens, Gerardus Nicolai [Gerard Nicolaas], Empedocles sive physicorum epigrammatum libri quinque, Groningae : H. Vechner 1783 (152 p.).

– Empedocles sive physicorum epigrammatum libri septem, Groningae 1788.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie [i. e. Hegel’s lectures from 1805 to 1830], in: Hegel’s Werke, hrsg. von K. L. Michelet et alii, Bände XIII-XV, Berlin 1833-7, Band XIII, 1833, p. 269-75.

Heidel, William Arthur, Qualitative Change in Pre-Socratic Philosophy, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 19, 1906, p. 353-79.

– On certain Fragments of the Pre-Socratics, in: Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences 48, 1913, p. 725-9 (B 109, B 110, B 101).

– Περι φύσεως: A Study of the Conception of Nature among the Pre-Socratics, in: Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences 45, 1910, p. 79-133. 

– Die Vorsokratiker, II, Parmenides, Zenon, Empedokles : griechisch-lateinisch-deutsch - Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse, Übersetzung. und Erläuterungen von M. L. G. M., Düsseldorf : Patmos, Artemis & Winkler, 2009, (Sammlung Tusculum); 2, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2011; 3, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2013. (The difference from the previous edition resides in the updated bibliography at the end of the volume.) See: http://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/m-l-gemelli-marciano

– Die empedokleische "Vierelementenlehre". Überlegungen über die Anfänge einer "naturwissenschaftlichen" Theorie, in: ELEMENTE – ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΑ – ELEMENTA: Antike und moderne Naturwissenschaft zum Ursprung der Dinge, Schweizerischer Altphilologenverband, Luzern, 2012, p. 25-36. (B 2, B 6, B 38, B 62, B 96.) 

– Feuer bei Heraklit und Empedokles: Aspekte und Funktionen einer göttlichen Kraft, in: Feuer und Wasser, Beiträge der Eranos Tagungen 2011 und 2012, ed. E. Hornung-A. Schweizer, Basel: Schwabe 2013, p. 133-157.

Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys, Purifying Rhetoric: Empedocles and the Myth of Rhetorical Theory, in: The quarterly journal of speech, Vol. 96, 3, 2010, p. 231-256. 

Gaisford, Thomas, Poetae minores graeci I-V, Lipsiae : BT 1814-20, III.284-6.

Gale, Monica Rachel., Myth and Poetry in Lucretius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. (P. 59-74, p. 219. B 3, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 128, B 130, B 131, B 151.)

– Etymological Wordplay and Poetic Succession in Lucretius, in: Classical Philology, 96, 2, 2001.

– Avia Pieridum loca: Tradition an Innovation in Lucretius, in: Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt, ed. Marietta Horster - Christiane Reitz, Palingenesia Band 85, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2005, p. 175-191. (Several fragments; mainly: B128.)

Gallavotti, Carlo, Alcune frasi di Empedocle interpretate con i criteri di Aristotele, in: Rendiconti della classe di scienze morali 28, 1973, p. 773-92. (B 115.7, B 35.17, B 13-14.)

– Il proemio di Empedocle, in: Helicon 13-4, 1973-4, p. 7-34. (B 4, B 131; a trial to reconstruct original filiation of fragments: B 131-B 7-B 19, B 16-B 3-B 1-B 2-B 110-B 12-B 4, B 6, B 109-B 107.)

– Il punto geometrico e l’uno di Empedocle nel trattato peripatetico della linea indivisible, in: Rendiconti dell’academia dell scienze dell’instituto di Bologna 29, 1974, p. 381-94. (The text of B 32 is δύο δεῖ; in the context of B 33 it is necessary to read ἡ δὲ στιγμὴ καὶ τὸ <ἓν> ἐν τοῖς ἀκινήτοις).

– Empedocle nei papiri ercolanesi, in: Le monde grec, ed. J. Bingen - G. Cambier - G. Nachtergal, Brussels 1975, p. 153-61.

– Empedocle: Poema fisico e lustrale, Milano : Arnoldo Mondadori 19751 (19914, 19935).

– La critica di Empedocle in Diogene di Enoanda, in: Museum Criticum (Bologna) 22, 1975-7, p. 243-9. (A 99, B 78.)

– Qualche frammento di Empedocle, in: Studi in onore di Cleto Carbonara, Napoli 1976, p. 355 n. (B 9.5.)

– Da Stesicoro ad Empedocle, in: Kokalos 26-7, 1980-1, p. 413-33.

– Nuovi appunti sul testo di Empedocle, in: Bollettino dei classici 6, 1985, p. 3-27.

Gallo, Italo, Ermarco e la polemica Epicura contro Empedocle, in: Esistenza e destino nel pensiero greco arcaico, a cura di P. Cosenza, Napoli : Ed. Scientifiche Italiane 1985, p. 33-50. (A 99.)

Galsworthy, Carrie, Language and Intent in Empedocles' cosmic cycle, Thesis for the degree of Doctor of philosophy- University of Cincinnati, 2010.

Garani, Myrto, Poetry and Analogy in Empedocles and Lucretius, PhD thesis, University of London 2005.

– Cosmological oaths in Empedocles and Lucretius, in: Horkos: the oath in Greek society, ed. A.H. Sommerstein - J. Fletcher, Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press 2007, 189-202, and 264-7.

– Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and analogy in Lucretius, New York - Abingdon: Routledge 2007. See review by Bill Gladhill at BMCR: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-05-24.html  (A lot of fragments are mentioned in this book. The main ones are: B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 13,  B 145, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 55, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 75, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 89B 91, B 92, B 93, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 129, B 131, a(ii).) 

– The Palingenesis of Empedocles' Calliope in Lucretius, p. 231-26, in: Papers on ancient literatures : Greece, Rome and the near East : proceedings of the Advanced seminar in the humanities, Venice International University 2004-2005. Padova : Sargon, 2008. (Quaderni del Dipartimento di scienze dell'antichità e del Vicino Oriente / Università Ca' Foscari Venezia; 4.)

– Lucretius and Ovid on Empedoclean Cows and Sheep, in: Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, ed. D.Lehoux - A. D. Morrison - A. Sharrock, Oxford: Oxford University Presse 2013, p. 233-259. (B 17, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 128 , B 136, B 137, a(ii).)

Gárcia Díaz, A., La metafísica de Empédocles, in: Dianoia 2, 1956, p. 167-80. http://dianoia.filosoficas.unam.mx/info/1956/DIA56_Garcia%20Diaz.pdf

Garland, Robert, The Greek Way of Death, London: Ducktworth 1985. (Page 63: a short survey of E. Katharmoi; E. was influenced with Orphism; E. did not acknowledged any underworld and judgment after death; B 144.)

– The Eye of the Beholder. Deformity and Disability in the Graeco-Roman World, London: Duckworth, 1995, p. 174-176 (a rather traditional overview of Empedoclean „evolutionary“ zoology from untraditional teratological perspective; A 72, B 57, B 61, B 62).

Gatz, Bodo, Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen, Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1967. (B 128, B 130.)

Gatzemeier, Matthias, Empedokles, in: Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, hrsg. von J. Mittelstraass, Mannheim - Wien - Zürich : Metzler 1980, I.540-1.

Gee, Emma, Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition, Oxford - New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, (Classical culture and society). (1.2 Aratus and Empedocles, p. 29-33, B 8, B 17, B 128.)

Geizie W. = Veazie, W. B. (the error in L’année philologique 1926).

Gemelli Marciano, Maria Laura, Le metamorfosi della tradizione: mutamenti di significato e neologismi nel Peri physeos di Empedocle, Bari : Levante editori 1990.

– L’atomismo e il corpuscolarismo empedocleo: frammenti di interpretazioni nel mondo antico, in: Elenchos 12, 1991, p. 5-37.

– Der Tod des Empedokles, in: Kleos: Estemporaneo di studi e testi sulla fortuna dell’antico, a cura di F. De Martino,  Bari : Levante 1994, p. 71-4.

– Alain Martin, Oliver Primavesi: L’Empédocle de Strasbourg Empedocles (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666), in: Gnomon 72, 2000, p. 389-400.

– Le “demonologie” Empedoclee, in: Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 205-35 (A 25, ambiguities in Emp., B 24, B 26, B 20, B 115, B 59, “we” in Pap. Strasb.).

– Le Contexte culturel des Présocratiques : adversaires et destinataires, in: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed. by A. Laks - C. Louguet, Lille, Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 83-114. (Emp.: p. 106-11)

– Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology, in: The Empedoclean Kosmos: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 373-407. http://www.klphs.uzh.ch/aboutus/personen/gemelli/gemelli_empedokles_2005.pdf  (A 72, B 20, B 27, B 62, B 126, d 14, reincarnation, P. Derveni, and P. Kingsley' s leitmotiv: Philia binds [imprisonment of the four divine roots], Neikos releases [freedom of the four divine roots]; Pausanias must learn how to bind and release. Empedocles is a purifier, iatromantis, seerhealer.)

– Lire du début : Quelques observations sur les incipit des présocratiques, in: Philosophie antique, 7, 2007, pp. 7-37. Pp. 9-13: B 2.

Gain, Frédéric, Le statut du « daimon » chez Empédocle, in: Philosophie antique 7, 2007, p. 121-150. (B 59, B 112, B 115.)

Gagné, Renaud, L'esthétique de la peur chez Empédocle, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXIV(1), 2006, p. 83-110. (B 115.3.)

Fülleborn, G. G., Die Fragmente des Empedokles, in: G. G. F., Beyträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie 6, Züllichau 1795, p. 90 (B 28).

Furley, David J., The Early History of the Concept of Soul, in: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 3, 1956, p. 1-18. (Pages 14-15; a not very original sketch of the Empedoclean conception of soul and cognition; B 117, B 115, B 3.9-12, B 105.2.)

– Empedocles and the Clepsydra, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 77, 1957, p. 31-4.

– Variations on Themes by Empedocles in Lucretius’ Proem, in: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 17, 1970, p. 55-64.

– Empedocles and the invention of elements, in: D. Furley, The Greek cosmologists, Vol I, The formation of the atomic theory and its earliest critics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987 (reprinted 1988, 1989), p. 79-104 (= chap. 7). (B 6, B 17, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 98.)

Furnari Luvarà, Giusi, Le origini siceliote della retorica e l’Empedocle di Domenico Scinà, in: Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto : Instituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia 1989, p. 185-204.

Furness, Raymond, Nietzsche and Empedocles, in: Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 2/2, 1971, p. 91-4.

GGG

Fritsche, Johannes, The riddle of the Sphinx: Aristotle, Penelope, and Empedocles, in: Monsters and Philosophy, ed. Charles T. Wolfe, London: College Publications, 2005, (Texts in Philosophy, 3), p. 1-19.

Fritzsche, R. A., Der Magnet und die Athmung in antiken Theorien, in: Rheinisches Museum 57, 1902, p. 363-391. (P. 368-369: Emp. theory of magnetism; p. 378-379: Emp. theory of breathing.)

Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise, Avec son diaphragme visionnaire : ᾿ΙΔΥΙΗΣΙ ΠΡΑΠΙΔΕΣΣΙ », Iliade XVIII, 481. À propos du bouclier d'Achille, in: Revue des Études Grecques, 115, 2, 2002. p. 463-484. (Useful for homeric background.)

Fuchs, Werner, Die Verseuchung des Wassers in Selinus und die Tat des Empedokles, in: Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäeologischen Instituts (Römische Abteilung) 64, 1957, p. 230-1 (A 1, par. 70).

Fox, M. C., in: Ancient Skies: Official Logbook of the Ancient Astronaut Society 17/4, 1990, s. p. (B 57 - B 61).

Fraisse, Jean-Claude, Philia: La notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique, essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé, J. Vrin: Paris 1974, p. 84-7. (An uninformative sketch of one of principal Emp. idea; Emp. philia was allegedly confined to be a cosmological conception and had not any anthropologic and emotional meaning but even in the cosmology Empedocles was not able to contribute essentially to the history of the term.)

Fränkel, Hermann, A Thought Pattern in Heraclitus, in: American Journal of Philology 59/3, 1938, p. 309-337 (p. 325, n. 35: B 2.2 and B 110)

– Man’s “ephemeros” Nature according to Pindar and Others, in: Transactions of American philological Association 77, 1946, p. 131-45 (B 2.2-4, B 131.1).

– Zur ‘Discordia’ des Ennius, in: Philologus 97 (N.S. 51), 1948, p. 354 (B 17.27; refusal of Norden’s theory on Ennius’ interpretation of Empedocles).

– Homerische Wörter, in: 'Antίdwron. Festschrift für Jacob Wackernagel ... gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen, Göttingen : Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht 1923, p. 275-7 (B. 2.6-9, ad B 3). 

Freeman, Edward Augustus, The History of Sicily from the Earliest Times I-IV, Oxford : Oxford University Press 1891 - 1894, II.342-56.

Freeman, Kathleen, The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. A Companion to Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford: Blackwell 1946 (second edition: Cambridge [Ma]: Harvard University Press 1959), p. 172-204.

– Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers: a Complete Translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press 1948 (199624), p. 51-69.

Frenkian, Aram M., Études de philosophie présocratique, Vol. II.: La philosophie comparée, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Parménide d’Élée, Paris: J. Vrin, 1937, p. 46-61 (110 p.). (B 8, B 109, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 134, B 62, B 110, B 100, B 84.)

– Theophrast De Sensu Kap. 10, in: Philologus 107, 1963, p. 313 (A 86, par. 10).

Frère, Jean, Le Cosmos d'Empédocle et le triomphe de la vie autour de l'usage répétitif des formules-images, in: Philosophia 30, 2000, p. 231-234.

– Trois penseurs présocratiques : Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle, in: Les Annales de l'Académie d'Alsace, 68, 2002, p. 76-86.

– Les dieux d'Élée et d'Agrigente, in: Agonistes - Essays in honour of Denis O'Brien, (ed.) J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 3-12.

Friedlaender, Paul, Δὶς καὶ τρὶς τὸ καλόν, in: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69, 1938, p. 375-80.

Friedländer, Pablo, El lenguaje poético de Empédocles, in: Synthesis, 2005, vol.12, pp. 59-77.  http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/synth/v12/v12a05.pdf

– La épica chamánica de Empédocles,  in: Societas Philosophorum Viventium - (without date; probably around 2006) - http://www.filosofiaviva.net/textos/archivos/pdf_10_18.pdf 

Foti, Veronique Marion, Empedocles’s philosophy of nature as mandating non-violence p 91-102, in: Values and Justice in the Global Era, ed. Kostas Boudouris, Athens: Ionia Publications, 2007.

Duchesne-Guillemin, J., D’Anaximandre à Empédocle: Contacts gréco-iraniens, in: Atti del convegno sul tema: La Persia e il mondo greco-romano. Roma 11. - 14. Aprile 1965, ed. A.Pagliano, Roma: Accademia Nazionale di Lincei, 1966, p. 423-31.

Duminil, Marie-Paule, Le Sang, les vaisseaux, le cœur, dans la collection hippocratique, anatomie et physiologie, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1983. (P. 216 & 247 : B 98 ; p. 239 : B 150 ; p. 270-272: B 100 ; p. 309 : B 105.)

Dümmler, Ferdinand, Akademika, Beiträge zur Litteraturgeschichte der sokratischen Schulen, Giessen: J. Ricker'sche Buchhandlung 1889, p. 216-41 (there are two worlds and two zoogonies; the zoogony of the Strife is documented with A 30, B 62, A 85 and A 70).

– Zur orphischen Kosmologie, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 7, 1894, p. 147-53 (Emp. and Orphismus; a critical reaction to Kern, in: AGPh 1, 1888, B 134.).

Dumont, Jean-Paul, Empédocle, in: Les Présocratiques, édition établie par Jean-Paul Dumont avec la collaboration de Daniel Delattre et de Jean-Louis Poirier, (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade) Paris : Gallimard 1988, p. 319-439, plus end notes p. 1294-1331. Reprint in Collection Folio Essais, Gallimard, 1991, under the title Les Ecoles Présocratiques, p. 127-247, plus end notes p. 792-824.

Dumoulié, Camille, Empédocle ou le pathos de l’Harmonie (au Ve siècle avant J.-C), in: Critique 49 (Nr. 553-554), 1993 (juin-juillet), p. 357-71 (a popular, antiquated and literary orientated sketch of Emp. teaching with some superficial parallels with Freud, Hölderlin, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Lacan; useless for Empedoclean studies).

Düntzer, Heinrich, Schedae criticae, in: Archiv für Philologie und Pädagogik 5, 1837, p. 205-11, p. 208 (B 21.2, B 71.1).

Duprat, Guillaume Léonce, Quomodo apud Aristotelem in ejus. De Anima doctrina. Empedocles et Hippocrates auctoritate contenderint cum Platone, apud A. Fontemoing, Lutetiae Parisiorum 1898 (61 p.).

Durić [Djurić], Miloš N., Empedokles und Anaxagoras als Ethiker [Etička shvatanja u Empedokla i Anaksagore], in: Živa antika 6, 1956, p. 93-118.

– Empedokle i načelo koegzistencije, in: Savremenik X knj., XIX br. 2, 1964, p. 179-87.

Dyer, Robert, Empedocles fr. 64 (Plut. Quaest. Nat. 21. 917 C), in: Mnemosyne 27, 1974, p. 175-6. (B 64.)

– Istorija helenske etike, Beograd : Zavod za izdavanije udžbenika 1961 (19672, 19973), p. 146-62 (= ŽA 6, 1956, p. 93-118).

EEE

Ebbesen, Sten, Boethius as an Aristotelian scholar, in: Aristoteles. Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet, vol. 2, Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben, Berlin / New York: De Gruyter 1987, p. 286-311. (p. 309-311: an account of Empedocles found in a scholium in MS Laur. gr. 72,15, folio 22, a 13th-century codex of Aristotele's Categories. This account is taken up in Primavesi 2008b, Janko 2010, Primavesi 2011 as 65 R, p. 460.)