Bibliography A-Z

᾿Εμπεδοκλῆς

Empedocles - Empedocle - Empédocle - Empedokles - Empedoklés - Empédocles - Эмпедокл - Empedoklész - エンペドクレス -  Емпедокле  -  Empedoklo  -  Empedioklis  אמפדוקלס  - إمبيدوكليس 

Bibliographie présentée par Tomáš Vítek, avec la collaboration de J.-C. Picot 

Le site empedocles.acragas, créé en 2007, a pour objectif de contribuer à la promotion des études empédocléennes. La constitution d'une bibliographie la plus complète possible contribue à cet objectif. La bibliographie parue initialement dans l'Empedoklés : II (2006) de Tomáš Vítek est ici mise à jour.

13/08/2016 - En raison d'une limite de capacité, inhérente au site Google, une page de Supplément a été ouverte pour de nouvelles insertions, voir désormais  :              

        https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/bibliography-a-z-supplement

Pour s'informer des nouveautés concernant les études empédocléennes :

 http://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/home

Pour connaître une part importante de la bibliographie attachée à un fragment donné (DK 31 B) :

http://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/bibliography-to-b-fragments  

Pour compléter la mise à jour de cette bibliographie sélective par fragment, vous pouvez naviguer sur la page AZ ou bien AZ supplément avec la fonction Find, à savoir CTRL + F (sous PC ; ou bien Command + F sous Mac) plus B numéro du fragment dans DK. Exemple sous PC : CTRL + F B 17 pour repérer les articles s'intéressant au fr. 17 DK. 

Je n'adhère pas à l'écriture B 17 pour désigner le fragment 17 (= fr. 17 DK). Néanmoins, par respect pour le travail de T. Vítek, qui s'exprime avec B pour fragment, je prolonge ici cette écriture.

Je remercie la Fondation Pythagoras (http://www.stichting-pythagoras.nl/) pour les indications bibliographiques fournies dans sa Newsletter annuelle.

Jean-Claude Picot

https://centreleonrobin.academia.edu/Membreassoci%C3%A9JeanClaudePICOT

empedocles.acragas at gmail.com

Dernière mise à jour : 31/ 07/ 2025

Empedocles - Bibliography

This bibliography includes all books and articles somehow devoted to Empedocles from 1500 until nowadays. It excludes most reviews, translations of modern works, and some more general works of reference. Simply, it was not possible to involve exhaustively all encyclopaedias, histories and surveys of Greek, European and World philosophy. I add to some titles very concise annotation or the discussed fragments and testimonies (in numbering of D-K).

 Tomáš Vítek

Praha, May 2007

 Bibliography 1500 - 1804 : https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/bibliography-1500-1804

General bibliography  (from 1805)

Abt, Adam, Die Apologie des Apuleius von Madaura und die Antike Zauberai, Giessen: Töpelmann 1908, p. 112-115. (B 111.1: φάρμακα.)

Acri, Francesco, Dei sistemi di Empedocle e Democrito, in: Rivista sicula di scienze, letteratura ed arti 2/4, 1870, p. 408-421, p. 408-411. (General outline of the principal theses of Emp. doctrine; a detailed idea of the author is the roots being composed of small divisible parts, which are able to penetrate the pores of each element during the maximal dominance of Strife.)

Adam, James, The religious teachers of Greece: Gifford lectures delivered at Aberdeen University, 1904-1906, Aberdeen 1908. (P. 244-253; B 17, B 21, B 26, B 29, B 30, B 31,B 35, B 59, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 133, B 134.)

Agnello, Nino, Empedocles : Frammenti, traduzione et commento, Cosenza : L. Pellegrini, 2008, (Filosofia teoretica ; 6). (Agnello follows B. Inwood's edition.)

Albinus, Lars, The Greek δαίμων between Mythos and Logos, in: Die Dämonen – Demons. Die Dämonologie der israelitisch-jüdischen und frühchristlichen Literatur im Kontext ihrer Umwelt, eds. A. Lange - H. Lichtenberger - K. F. D. Römheld, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2003, p. 425-446. (Empedocles: p. 431-433, B 115, B112.)

Alesse, Francesca, L’Empedocle di Renato Laurenti, in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti - C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 291-304.

Alessio, Felice, Empedocle, in: La Rassegna Nazionale 9/35 (16. maggio, Firenze), 1887, p. 308-355. (A popular sketch of Emp. teaching.)

Alexander, Thomas M., Aristotle's Dialectical Criticism of Empedocles' Concept of Animate Being, Master Thesis (Dir. John Anton), Emory University, 1976. 

– The Sphairos God in Empedocles' Two Poems, in: Southwest Philosophical Studies, X, 1, 1985, p. 84-95, (B 27, B 29, B 98, B 105, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 134, B 146, in favor of daimôn = piece of Love, discussion of Cornford and Kahn's views about the daimôn.)

Algra, Keimpe - Mansfeld, Jaap, Three thêtas in the “Empédocle de Strasbourg”, in: Mnemosyne 54, 2001, p. 78-84. (B 20, B 26, a(i) 6, a(ii) 17, c 3, d 5-6.)

Alt, Karin, Einige Fragen zu den 'Katharmoi' des Empedokles, in: Hermes 115, 1987, p. 385-411; in: Hermes 116, 1988, p. 264-271.

– Der Daimon als Seelenführer. Zur Vorstellung des persönlichen Schutzgeistes bei den Griechen, in: Hyperboreus, 6, 2, 2000, p. 219-251.

– Man and daimones: do the daimones influence man’s life?, in: The philosopher and society in late Antiquity: essays in honour of Peter Brown, ed. Andrew Smith, Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales 2005, p. 73-90. (Plato, Plutarch, Hippolytus, Celsus, Plotinus, Porphyris, Maximus Tyrius, Apuleius, Alcinous.)

Altheim, Franz - Stiehl, Ruth, Porphyrios und Empedokles, Tübingen: Niemeyer 1954.

– New Fragments of Greek Philosophers I: Empedocles, Democritus, Theophrastus in Arabic Translation, in: East and West 12, 1, 1961, p. 3-18. (B 22, B 76, B 84, B 109, B 112, B 117, B 126, B 127, B 128, B 137, B 138, B 139, B 146, B 148.)

Althoff, Jochen, Presocratic discourse in poetry and prose: The case of Empedocles and Anaxagoras, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Volume 43(2), 2012, p. 293–299. (B 6, B  8, B 11.) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368111001270

Amato, Eugenio, Un discorso inedito di Procopio di Gaza: In Meletis et Antoninae Nuptias, Revue des études tardo-antiques, 1, 2011-2012, p. 15-69. (P. 48-56 - B 17, B 26, B 51, B 154, Papyrus Strasbourg.)

http://www.revue-etudes-tardo-antiques.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ret1amato.pdf

Andò, Valeria, Nestis o l’elemento acqua in Empedocle, in: Kokalos 28-29, 1982-3, p. 31-51. (B 6, B 96.)

Andreus, H[ans?], Empedocles, de ander, Gravenhage: Stols 1955. (36 p.)

Andriopoulos, Démétrios Z., Empedocles’ theory of perception, in: Platon, 24, 1972, p. 290-298.

Angiò, F., Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle (1999) and A. Martin - O. Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (1999), in: Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 3, 2000, p. 1039-1041.

– Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle (1999), in: Quaderni di storia 52, 2000, p. 301-304.

Anonymus, Über die Bergdurchstechung des Empedokles in Akragas, in: Beilage zur Augsburger allgemeinen Zeitung 319 (15. Nov.), 1881, p. 4691-2.

Anonymus, Empedocles, in: The North British Review, 45/6, 1866, p. 420-440. Also Art.VI.- Empedocles, in: The North British Review, American edition, 45, December, 90, 1866, , p. 221-231. (B 2, B 6, B 27, B 31, B 35, B 38, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 141, B 146, B 147. Epithets, metaphors. Apollo.)

Anonymus, I frammenti di Empedocle, Napoli: Stabilimento Industrie Editoriale Meridionali 1935.

Apelt, Ernst Friedrich, Parmenidis et Empedoclis doctrina de mundi structura (diss.), Ienae: Sumptibus F. Maukii1857, p. 10-14.

Arata, Luigi, Sul frammento 100 D.-K. di Empedocle, in: Studi classici e orientali 45, 1997, p. 65-84. (B 100.)

Arcellashi, André, Empedoclea - Terentia ou la ruelle de la rhétorique, in: Helmantica 50, 1999, p. 45-55. 

Armstrong, David – Ponczoch Joseph A., [Philodemus] On Wealth (PHerc. 1570 Cols. VI-XX, Pcc. 4-6a): New Fragments of Empedocles, Menander, and Epicurus, in: Cronache Ercolanesi. Bollettino del Centro Internazionale per lo Studio dei Papiri Ercolanesi, 2011, 41, p. 97-138.

– Empedocles and Philodemus in PHerc. 1570, col. VI 9-19, in: Cronache Ercolanesi 43, 2013, p. 113-116.

Arundel, Maureen Rosemary (= M. R. Wright), Empedocles fr. 35.12-15, in: The Classical Review 12, 2, 1962, p. 109-111. (B 35.)

– An Interpretation of Empedocles (diss.), University of Oxford 1963.

– "Principio Caelum" (Aeneid VI. 724-751), in: Proceedings of the Virgil Society, 3, 1963-1964, p. 27-34. (B 38.4., B 134.) http://virgil.vacau.com/?page_id=260   http://virgil.vacau.com/pvs/1963/full.pdf?

Asheri, David, Agrigenti libera: Rivolgimenti interni e problemi constituzionali ca. 471 - 446 a. C., in: Athenaeum 68, 1990, p. 482-501.

Atanasijevič, Xenija, Empedokle iz Agrigenta, in: Misao 7/131-2, 1925, p. 699-702 and 891-905.

– Empedoklovi religijski fragmenti, in: Kalendar Vreme (Beograd 1925), p. 64-65.

Attilio Piovano, G., Review of Ettore Bignone. I poeti filosofi della Grecia, Empedocle, 1916, in: Athenaeum 6, 1918, p. 76-82.

Aubry, Gwenaëlle, Démon et intériorité d’Homère à Plotin: esquisse d’une histoire, in: Le moi et l’intériorité, G. Aubry & F. Ildefonse, Paris: J. Vrin 2008, p. 255-268. [Emp.: p. 259-260.]

Azevedo, Cristiane A. de, Uma questão de saber: thymós e nóos em Parmênides e Empédocles, in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 63-77. 

On-line:  http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/353/546

BBB

Babut, Daniel, La religion des philosophes grecs: de Thalès aux Stoïciens, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1974, (Collection SUP, Littératures anciennes, 4), p. 34-42.

– Sur l’unité de la pensée d’Empédocle, in: Philologus 120, 1976, p. 139-164. (B 21, B 115, B 116, B 118, B 120, B 126, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 146, B 147, B 148.)

Bacca, Juan David García, Los Presocraticos, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica 1980 (1996: 6 ed.).

Bacigalupo, Maria Vittoria, Teriomorfismo e trasmigrazione, in: Filosofia, rivista trimestrale (Torino), 16.2, 1965, p. 267-290. (Empedocles: p. 278-280.)

Badolati, Giuseppe S., Empedocle di Agrigento: l’uomo, il medico, l’ambiente, in: Index Empedocleus, Genova 1991, I.37-48.  

Baestlein, Albert, Quid Lucretius debuerit Empedocli Agrigentino, in: Jahresbericht des Königlichen Preussischen Hennebergischen Gymnasiums zu Schleusingen, Druck der Keyssner’schen Hofbuchdruckerei in Meiningen 1875, p. 1-21 [printed also under the title Quid debeat Lucretius Empedocli Agrigentino].

Baffioni, Carmela, Una storia della filosofia greca nell’Islam del XII. secolo (Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Karím aš-Šahrastání), II: Anassagora ed Empedocle, in: Elenchos 3, 1982, p. 87-107 (Roma 1983).

Bakhouche, Béatrice, (ed) Calcidius. Commentaire au Timée de Platon, Tome I. Édition critique et traduction française par B. B., avec la collaboration de L. Brisson pour la traduction, Paris: Jean Vrin 2011, (Histoire des doctrines de l’Antiquité classique, 42).

– Les citations d’Empédocle chez Calcidius, in: Ítaca : quaderns catalans de cultura clàssica, 28-29, 2013, p. 45-62. Online:

http://publicacions.iec.cat/repository/pdf/00000199%5C00000005.pdf 

(γόμφοι. B 105, B 109, B 115.5, B 117, B 121, B 136, B 137.)

– Quelques remarques sur les présocratiques à Rome: la figure d’Empédocle de Cicéron à Saint Augustin, in: Revue des Etudes Tardo-antiques, Tome IV, 3, 2014, p. 53-71.

– Empedocles latinus : citations et traductions latines de fragments empédocléens, in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 56-67. Released in October 2014. (B 90, B 105, B 109, B 117, B 121.)

 http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1453/1294

Bakhuizen van den Brink, Regnerus Cornelius (Reinier Cornelis), Disputatio literaria inauguralis continens varias lectiones ex historia philosophiae antiquae etc., H. W. Hazenberg, Lugduni-Batavorum, 1842. (P. 31-35. B 115.6.)

Bakker, C., Iets over den invloed van Empedokles en Aristoteles op de geneeskunde en de magie bij de oude Grieken en Romeinen, in: Bijdragen tot de Geschiedenis der Geneeskunde = Uitgave van het Nederlandisch Tijdschrift voor Genneskunde 10, 1930, p. 29-44. (A 145.)

Balaudé, Jean-François, Le Démon et la communauté des vivants. Étude de la tradition d’interprétation antique des Catharmes d’Empédocle, de Platon à Porphyre, diss., Lille III 1992. (B 115, B 117, B 122, B 123.)

– Parenté du vivant et végétarisme radical: le “défi” d’Empédocle, in: L’Animal dans l’antiquité, ed. B. Cassin - J.-L. 

Labarrière, dir. G. Romeyer-Dherbey, Paris: J. Vrin 1997, p. 31-53. (B 2, B 16, B 22, B 115, B 117, B 124, B 135, B 136.)

– [Notes de la Vie d’] Empédocle, in: Diogène Laërce. Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres, Paris: Le Livre de Poche 1999, (Classiques modernes. La Pochothèque) p. 980-1002, 1022-1023. (A 1.)

– Le Vocabulaire des Présocratiques, Paris: Ellipses 2002. (B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 23, B 27, B 35, B 89, B 114, B 115, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 139.)

– Empédocle d’Agrigente, in: Le Dictionnaire de l’Antiquité, ed. Jean Leclant, Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France 2005, p. 785-789. (A general sketch of Emp. teaching which is based on J. Bollack’s theories from Sixties.)

– Le savoir-vivre philosophique : Empédocle, Socrate, Platon, Paris: Grasset & Fasquelle 2010, (Le collège de philosophie). Emp.: p. 87-128. Chap. 4. La réflexion éthique avant Socrate : les Catharmes d'Empédocle, (a) les deux poèmes et le papyrus de Strasbourg (p. 87-91), (b) les démons, et leurs significations  (p. 92-104). – Chap. 5. Refonder la communauté humaine : le végétarisme radical d'Empédocle (p. 105-128: a reprint of "Parenté du vivant et végétarisme radical: le “défi” d’Empédocle", with little modifications or improvements). (B 2, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 122, B 123, B 127, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 151.) 

– France Culture – Les nouveaux chemins de la connaissance : Préhistoires de la pensée 3/5 : Empédocle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPLmHJrymhI 

Baltussen, Han, An Empedoclean ‘Hearing Aid’? Fragment B 99 Revisited, in: Méthexis 19, 2006. (B 99.)

– Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator, Duckworth, 2008. (Emp.: p. 76-78, 165. B 17, B 21, B 22, B 24, B 109, B 115, B 134.)

Baltzer, Eduard, Empedokles, eine Studie, in: Athenaeum 2-4, 1876, p. 159-165 and 203-207.

– Empedocles, eine Studie zur Philosophie der Griechen, Leipzig: Oscar Eigendorf 1879. (More or less the reprint of the previous article plus a translation of the B fragments.)

Βαμβακάς, Κ., Οι θεμελιωτές της δυτικής σκέψης : ένας διαχρονικός παραλληλισμός μεταξύ προσωκρατικού στοχασμού, φιλοσοφίας και φυσικής επιστήμης, Ηράκλειο : Πανεπιστημιακές εκδόσεις Κρήτης, 2001. P. 341-409 (Εμπεδοκλής).

Barbanti, Maria, Empedocle in Plotino e in Porfirio, in: Giornale di metafisica 21, 1999, p. 217-233. (B 105, B 115, B 120, B 126, B 128, B 129, B 139.)

Barnes, Hazel Estella., Unity in the Thought of Empedocles, in: Classical Journal 63, 1967, p. 18-23.

Barnes, Jonathan, The Presocratic Philosophers, Volume 2, Empedocles to Democritus, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1979, (The arguments of the philosophers). (Emp.: p. 161-201). Revised edition in one volume in 1982, (Emp.: p. 308-317, p. 418-423, p. 477-504, p. 536-538 ). (An extensive translation of B fragments and their contexts. Reprint in London-New York: Routledge 1999, 2000, 2001.)

– Review of Wright, Empedocles: The Extant Fragments, 1981, in: The Classical Review 32.2, 1982, p. 191-196. (Important.)

– Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981, in: Greece and Rome, 30, 1, 1983, p. 103. 

– Early Greek Philosophy, London: Penguin Books 1987, (Penguin Classics).  Revised edition London: Penguin Books 2001.

– Review of  Index Empedocleus, 1991, by Imbraguglia, Badolati, Morchio, Battegazzore, Messina, in: The Classical Review, 43.1, 1993, p. 165.

Barrio Gutiérrez, José, Empédocles: Sobre la naturaleza de los seres. Las purificaciones, Buenos Aires: Aguilar 1964 (19813), (Biblioteca deiniciación filosófica, 90).

Bartolini Niccolini, Olga, De T. Lucretio Caro, in: Latinitas 3, 1955, p. 280-286.

Bartoš, Hynek, Nesmrtelná PSYCHÉ a putující DAIMÓN [The immortal Psyché and the wandering Daimón], in: Reflexe 29, 2005, p. 27-57. (Emp.: p. 43-56. A solid analysis of the Empedoclean conception of wandering “daimôn” and reincarnation on basis of the contemporary sources and theories; the text is written in Czech, summaries in English and German. B 59, B 115.)

Battegazzore, Antonio Mario, Il linguaggio di Empedocle, in: Index Empedocleus, ed. G. Imbraguglia et al., Genova 1991, I.69-80.

– La magia della parola in Empedocle e Gorgia, in: Giornale di metafisica 21, 1-2, 1999, p. 67-99.

Battistini, Yves, Empédocle, in: Revue Empédocle 1, 1949, p. 55-60.

– Les Purifications, in: Revue Empédocle 1, 1949, p. 61-66.

– Empédocle d’Agrigente. De la nature, traduction par Yves Battistini, in: Botteghe Oscure, Quaderno X, II semestre 1952, Roma: Arnaldo Mondadori, p. 7-31.

– Trois contemporains: Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle, Traduction nouvelle et intégrale avec notices par Y. B., Paris: Gallimard 1955, (Les Essais, 78). Corrected reeditions: Trois présocratiques: Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle, Paris: Gallimard 19681, (Idées); 19882, (Tel).

(Emp. in 1955, p. 115-191, plus “table de concordance entre fragments et sources, p. 199-202. In 1988², p. 141-235, plus p. 243-246. A free translation of the B fragments).

– Empédocle, Légende et œuvre : Sur la nature, Purifications, Texte intégral, présentation, traduction et notes Y. B., Paris: Imprimerie nationale Éditions 1997, (La Salamandre).

Battistini, Yves et Olivier, Les présocratiques, traduction, présentation et commentaires, Paris: Nathan 1990, (Les Intégrales de philo). 

Baumann, Hermann, Das doppelte Geschlecht. Ethnologische Studien zur Bisexualität in Ritus uns Mythos, Berlin: Dietrich Reimer 1955. (P. 179-180: influence of Empedoclean conception of bisexuality on Aristophanes’ mythus in Plato’s Symposion. P. 304-307: Empedoclean theory about influence of left and right sides of body on generation.)

Bauer, Johannes Bapt., "Μονίη" Empedokles B 27.4 und 28.3, in: Hermes 89, 1961, p. 361-369.

Baxter, Timothy M. S. , The Cratylus: Plato's critique of naming, Leyde: Brill 1992, p. 122-124. (B 6.)

Beare, John Isaac, Greek Theories of Elementary Cognition: from Alcmaeon to Aristotle, Oxford 1906, p. 13-21 and 95-99. (A 86.)

Becker, Otfrid, Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken, Berlin: Weidman 1937, (Hermes Einzelschriften, 4). (P. 147-150.)

Βέϊκος, Θ. [see also Veikos], Οι προσωκρατικοί, Αθήνα : Ελληνικά γράμματα, 1998. P. 165-183 (Εμπεδοκλής).

Bennett, John, Empedocles the Poet: His Style and Metre, (diss.), Trinity College, Dublin 1940. 

Benson, J. L., Greek color theory and the four elements: a cosmological interpretation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Libraries, 2000. (Empedocles: p. 21-24, A 69a, A 86, A 92, B 21, B 94, B 67, B 71, B 23.)

http://scholarworks.umass.edu/art_jbgc/1/    http://www.library.umass.edu/benson/jbgcimages.html

Bercovitch, Sacvan, Empedocles in the English Renaissance, in: Studies in Philology, 65, 1, 1968, p. 67-80.

Bergemann, Lutz, Transformation und Konstruktion: Empedokles als „religious atomist" und exemplum eines „true system" of the universe, in: Ralph Cudworth - System aus Transformation: zur Naturphilosophie der Cambridge Platonists und ihrer Methode, Berlin - Boston (Mass.): Walter de Gruyter 2012, p. 99-114.

Bergk, Theodor, Schedae criticae. Fasciculus II, in: Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 39, 1835, p. 313-320. (Page 313 = B 17, page 314 = B 123.)

– De scolio Pindari in Xenophontem Corinthium dissertatio et coniecturae in poetas graecos, in: Acta Societatis Graecae 1, Lipsiae 1836, p. 187-208; Empedocles: p. 203-207. (See also reprint in De locis quibusdam Empedocleis, 1886; B 2, B 3, B 17, B 27, B 42, B 82, B 100, B112, B 136.)

– Coniectanea non reiectanea, in: Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft 54-5, 1837, p. 447-452.

– Commentatio de Prooemio Empedoclis, in: Ankündigungschrift der am 28 September 1839 zu haltenden öffentlichen Prüfung sämmtlicher Classen des Königl. Joachimsthalschen Gymnasiums, Berlin: Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1839, p. 1-34. (= Kleine philologische Schriften, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, II, p. 8-43.)

– Review of Karsten’s Empedocles, in: Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 97, October, 1842, p. 1001-1011. (= Kleine philologische Schriften, Halle 1886, II, p. 45-59.)

– Empedocles, in: Poetae lyrici Graeci, Leipzig: Reichenbach 1843, chap. XVI, p. 431 (1853, Chap. 23, p. 468). (B 156, B 157.)

– Commentationum criticarum specimen II, in: Indices lectionum et publicarum et privatarum, quae in Academia Marburgensi per semestre hibernum anno 1844-5, Marburgi 1844, p. ii-iv (= Kleine philologische Schriften, Halle 1886, II, p. 43-5).

– Review of Stein, in: Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik 68/23, 1853, p. 21-26. (= in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 59-66.) (Emp.: p. 203-207. B 2, B 3, B 17, B 27, B 42, B 82, B 100, B112, B 136.)

– Philologische Thesen, zweite Centurie, Schluss, in: Philologus 29, 1870, p. 319-330. (P. 320). (= Reprint in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 738-760.) (Item 60: B 98. Item 61: B 21.3-6.)

– De locis quibusdam Empedocleis, in: Kleine philologische Schriften, Halle 1886, II, p. 3-7. (Previously published in De scolio Pindari in Xenophontem Corinthium dissertatio et coniecturae in poetas graecos, in: Acta Societatis Graecae 1, Lipsiae 1836, p. 187-208; Empedocles: p. 203-207. B 2, B 3, B 17, B 27, B 42, B 82, B 100, B112, B 136.)

– Commentationum de reliquiis comoediae atticae antiquae, Lipsiae 1888. (B 105, B 137 etc.)

Bernabé Pajares, Alberto, Los filósofos presocráticos como autores literarios, in: Emerita 47, 1979, p. 357-394.

– Lo uno y lo múltiple en la especulación presocrática: nociones, modelos y relaciones, in: Taula 27-28, 1997, p. 75-99.

– La física de Empédocles y Anaxágoras, in: Ciencia y cultura en la grecia antigua, clásica y helenística, in: Actas años vi y vii, Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia, 2000, p. 71-95.

http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/educacion/3/Usrn/fundoro/archivos%20adjuntos/publicaciones/actas/actas_6_7_pdf/Act.VI-VII_C004_txi_w.pdf

– De Tales a Demócrito. Fragmentos presocráticos, Introducción, traducción y notas de A.  B., Madrid: Alianza Editorial 2001², (Biblioteca temática, 8241). (Emp.: p. 181-242, 327-340. First edition 1988. 3rd edition: 2008.)

– Orphisme et Présocratiques : bilan et perspectives d’un dialogue complexe, in: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique : what is presocratic philosophy? ed. A. Laks - C. Louguet, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 205-247. (B 6.)

 – Poeta Epici Graeci, Testimonia et fragmenta, Pars II, Orphicorum et Ophicis Similium. Testimonia et Fragmenta, Fasc. I, Munich-Leipzig: Saur 2004. (B 112, B 146-147, B 115, B 126, B 117, B 118, B 148.)

Bernabé, Alberto - Jiménez San Cristóbal, Ana Isabel , Instrucciones para el más allá : las laminillas órficas de oro, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas 2001. (P. 193-194: B6; p. 195:  B25.)

 – Instructions for the netherworld: the orphic gold tablets, translated by Michael Chase, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2008, (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World, 162). (P. 16: B 129;  p. 39: B 114, B 121; p. 65: B 115, B 132 ; p. 44, 84: B 119; p. 109: B 115; p. 118: B 17, B 26, B 35, B 38; p. 119: B 115; p. 145, 148, 149, 192, 193: B6; p. 146: B 22; p. 173: B 112.)

Bernardakis, Gregorius, N., Plutarchi Chaeronensis. Moralia, recognovit G. N. B., Vol. III, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1891. (De exilio, B 115.) 

Bernays, Jacob, Theophrastos' Schrift über Frömmigkeit. Ein Beitrag zur Religionsgeschichte, Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz 1866. (B 128: p. 79-81, 95-96, 117-179.)

Bersano, Arturo, Review of E. Bignone, I poeti della Grecia - Empedocle, 1916, in: Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 44, 1916, p. 569-574,

Bertini, Giovanni Maria, Dottrine religiose di Empedocle, in: Atti della reale Accademia delle scienze di Torino 4, 1868-1869, p. 675-682. (Superficial study dealing [a] on Love, B 132 - B 134, B 31: she should be the highest god of Empedocles’ system; [b] on transmigration, B 115, B 117, B 146: unoriginal theses; [c] on the theory of cognition, B 2 - B 4: the senses are untrustworthy, the only one criterion of cognition is a reason; [d] alleged eclecticism of Empedocles.)

– La filosofia greca prima di Socrate, esposizione storico-critica, Torino: Stamperia Reale 1869. (Emp.: p. 233-256.)

Betegh, Gábor, A strasbourgi Empedoklész-papirusz, in: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Filozófiai Bizottságának folyóirata, 6, 1999 - http://epa.oszk.hu/00100/00186/00005/996_betegh.html

– Empédocle, Orphée et le papyrus de Derveni, in: Les anciens savants: études sur les philosophies préplatoniciennes, réunies par Pierre-Marie Morel et Jean-François Pradeau, Strasbourg (Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, 12), Université Marc Bloch, 2001, p. 47-70. (B 17, B 26, B 27, B111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 140,  B 136, B 137, B 139, d MP.)

– The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004. (P. 370-372: Empedocles and Orpheus; B 21, B 111, B 112, B 115.)

Bicknell, Peter James., The Shape of the cosmos in Empedocles, in: La Parola del Passato 23, 1968, p. 118-119. (A 501, A 47.)

Bidez, Joseph, La Biographie d’Empédocle, Gand: Clemm 1894. Reprint: Hildesheim - New York: Olms 1973.

– Observations sur quelques fragments d’Empédocle et de Parménide, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 9, 1896, p. 190-207 (§ XIII), p. 298-309 (§ XVII). (B 2, B 3, B 4, B 21, B 23, B 71, B 110, B 111.)

Bidez, Joseph & Cumont, Franz, LesMages hellénisés. Zoroastre, Ostanès et Hystaspe d’après la tradition grecque,Tome I- Introduction, Tome II- Les Textes, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1938. Reprintin a single volume in 2007, by Les Belles Lettres, (Collection d’étudesanciennes, 134, série grecque). [A 145, 7-8. P. 238-240.]

Biès, Jean, Empédocle et l’Orient, in: Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé, 27, 4, 1968, p. 365-403. (Disputable comparison between Emp. and Indian sources plus a very free translation of some fragments.)

– Empédocle d’Agrigente, Paris, Éditions Traditionnelles 1969 (19772, 20033). [“Frère des chamanes, devins, voyants, bardes errants, Empédocle est le plus “hindou” des présocratiques. L’auteur découvre dans l’œuvre d’étranges rapprochements avec la cosmologie, la métaphysique et les ascèses des Orients traditionnels. L’ouvrage s’achève sur une traduction inédite et annotée des Fragments.” http://www.cgjung.net/jbies/index.htm . ]

– Empédocle. Philosophie présocratique et spiritualité orientale, Paris: Éditions Almora 2010, (Chemins de flammes).

Bignone, Ettore, Review of Emilio Bodrero. Il principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle, 1905, in: Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 34, 1906, p. 613-616.

– Empedocle ed Epicuro, in: Bolletino di filologia classica 21, 1915, p. 156-161.

– Due versi di Arato attribuiti erroneamente ad Empedocle, in: Bolletino di filologia classica 22, 1916, p. 151-152. (B 154b.)

– Empedocle: Studio critico, traduzione e commento delle testimonianze e dei frammenti, Torino: Fratelli Bocca 1916, (Il pensiero greco, 11). Reprint in Roma: "L’Erma" di Bretschneider 1963.

– La teoria del peso in Empedocle ed Anassagora, in: Bolletino di filologia classica 24, 1918, p. 97-100.

– Ennio ed Empedocle, in: Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 57, 1929, p. 10-30. Reprint in E. Bignone, Studi sul pensiero antico, Napoli: L. Loffredo 1938, (Nuova Collezione, T.I.), chap. 7, p. 327-355. Reprint in Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider 1965. (On alleged Empedoclean content of Ennius’verses, cf. B 17.18 and frg. 357, Valmaggi.)

– Note di critica del testo a Epicuro, a Seneca, alla vita di Empedocle di Diogeni Laerzio, a Polistrato epicureo, in: Bolletino del comitato per la preparazione dell´edizione nazionale dei classici greci e latini 2, 1941, p. 103-9, p. 106 (A 1).

Bing, Peter, The Voice of those who live in the Sea: Empedocles and Callimachus, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 41, 1981, p. 33-36. (B 74, B 71.)

Birch, Thomas (ed.), The works of Ralph Cudworth, D.D., containing The true intellectual system of the universe, Sermons, &c., a new edition, with references to the several quotations in the intellectual system, and a life of the author, by Thomas Birch M.A.  F.R.S., in four volumes, Vol. I, Oxford: D. A. Talboys 1829. (Empedocles: p. 93-98, 111-118, 325-327.)

Blanc Alain. - De Lamberterie Charles, Chronique d'étymologie grecque n° 14 (CEG 2015), in: Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 2013/2, Tome 87, p. 157-202. (B 110.10.)

Blass, Friedrich, Zu Empedokles, in: Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, 1883, p. 19-20. (B 23.9, B 84, B 85, B 121.1).

Bluck, Richard Stanley Harold, On ΤΡΑΓΙΚΗ: Plato, Meno 76 E, in: Mnemosyne 4/14, 1961, p. 289-295. (A 921.)

– Plato’s Meno, Cambridge 1964, p. 61-75. (“Transmigration and recollection before Plato”: B 115, B 146, B 117, B 64 and 250-3 A 921.)

Blumenthal, Henry Jacob, Empedocles frg. 17.19-20, in: Grazer Beiträge 3, 1975, p. 21-29. (B 17.)

Bock, Martin, Aischylos und Akragas, in: Gymnasium 65, 1958, p. 402-450.

Bodei Giglioni, Gabriella, Come gli uomini divennero malvagi: sviluppo della civiltà, alimentazione e sacrificio in Teofrasto, in: Rivista storica italiana 103, 1991, p. 5-32. (B 128, B 154.)

Bodéüs, R., De la poésie à la métaphysique. Regards sur un terme d’Empédocle, in: Revue Belge de philologie et d´histoire 52, 1974, p. 36-58.

Bodrero, Emilio, Il principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle. Studio preceduto da un saggio bibliografico e dalla traduzione dei frammenti Empedoclei, Roma: ErmannoLoescher & Co. 1904 (Roma: G. Bretschneider 19752, (Philologica, 2).).

Böhme, Angelika, Die Lehre von der  Seelenwanderung in der antiken griechischen und indischen Philosophie: ein Vergleich der philosophischen Grundlegung bei den Orphikern, bei Pythagoras, Empedocles und Platon mit dem Upanischaden, dem Urbuddhismus und dem Jainismus (diss.), Jüchen, Düsseldorf 1989, p. 29-41. (On Emp. daimonology: B 115, B 141, B 117, B 140, B 146 etc.)

Bollack, Jean, Die Metaphysik des Empedokles als Entfaltung des Seins, in: Philologus 101, 1957, p. 30-54.

– Styx et serments, in: Revue des études grecques, 71, 334-338, 1958, p. 1-35. (B 30, B 115. Reprint in La Grèce de personne, 1997, with little modifications, p. 265-287, 435-443.)

– Lukrez und Empedokles fr. 110, in: Die Neue Rundschau 70, 1959, p. 656-689. (B 110.)

– Le Proème du Περὶ φύσεως d´Empédocle, in: Revue des études grecques 72, 1959, p. 15-16.

– Lukrez I. 1114-1117 und Empedokles fr. 110, in: Philologus 104, 1960, p. 295-298.

– Eros und die Liebe. Der Mythos des Aristophanes im Gastmahl des Plato », in: Die Neue Rundschau 72, 1961, p. 781-793.

– Empédocle ou l’ancienne physique, in: L’information littéraire [historique ?] 17, 1965, p. 203-207.

– Empédocle, I-III, Paris: Éditions de Minuit 1965-1969,(Le sens commun). I: Introduction à l’ancienne physique, 1965; II: Les Origines, édition et traduction des fragments et des témoignages, 1969; III: Les Origines, commentaire 1, 1969; III: Les Origines, commentaire 2, 1969. Reprint Paris: Gallimard 1992 (Tel, 201, 202, 203). (Reprint "commentaire 1" and "commentaire 2" are in one book (Tel, 203) instead of two in 1969.)

– Review of G. Nélod, Empédocle d'Agrigente, 1959, in: Gnomon, 38.7, 1966, p. 725-727.

– Les zones de la cosmogonie d’Empédocle, in: Hermes 96, 2, 1968, p. 239-240.

– Une histoire de σοφίη, in: Revue des Études Grecques, 81, 386-388, 1968, p. 550-554. (Discussion of B. Gladigow, Sophia und Kosmos, Hildesheim 1965. B 129.)

– L'autre Grèce (entretien avec Jean Bollack), in: Le Monde, 20 décembre 1969.

– Empédocle, in: Encyclopædia Universalis, 6, Paris: 1970, p. 146-147. (The text has been modified later [probably for the 5th edition in 2002, just before Empédocle: Les Purifications was out], after publication of L'Empédocle de Strasbourg, 1999, in order to include the edition of the Papyprus. The bibliography following the text helps to precise the date of publication.)

–  Review of D. O’Brien, Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle. A Reconstruction from the Fragments and Secondary Sources, Cambridge, 1969, in: Gnomon 43.5, 1971, p. 433-439.

– Empedocle e la fisica antica, in: I Presocratici, a cura di W. Lezsle, Bologna 1982, p. 353 - 362. (Italian translation of Empédocle ou l'ancienne physique appeared in L'information littéraire, 17, 1965, p. 203-207.)

– Le modèle scientiste : Empédocle chez Freud, in: Littoral 15-16 (L'hainamoration de transfert), 1985, p. 21-27. (Revue de psychanalyse.)

– Empedokles von Agrigent, in: Der Neue Pauly, Altertum Band 3 Cl-Epi, herausgegeben von H. Cancik und H. Schneider, Stuttgart-Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler 1997, p. 1011-1015.

– La Grèce de personne, Paris, Editions du Seuil, 1997. (P. 107-114, 396-397 [notes]: Le modèle scientiste : Empédocle chez Freud. P. 265-287, 435-443 [notes]: Styx et serments.)

– Empédocle sur papyrus, in: Quinzaine littéraire 784, May 1, 2000, p. 19.

– “Voir la Haine”: Sur les nouveaux fragments d’Empédocle, in: Methodos 1, 2001, p. 173-185.

– Remarques générales et particulières, in: Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 69-77.

– Empédocle. Les Purifications. Un projet de paix universelle, édité, traduit du grec et commenté par Jean Bollack, Paris: Éditions du Seuil 2003. Spanish translation by José M. Zamora: Bollack J., Empédocles: Las purificaciones, Madrid: Arena Libros 2007.

– 13 - Empedokles in: Dichtung wider Dichtung. Paul Celan unddie Literatur, Wallstein Verlag 2006, p. 301-314. (Translation of chap. 13, Lecture de l'antique, p. 196 in: Poésie contre poésie : Celan et la littérature, Paris: PUF 2011.)

– Empedocles: Two Theologies, Two Projects, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 45-72.

– Arcimboldo rencontre Empédocle, in: Philosophie magazine 10, septembre, 2007.

– Empédocle, in: J. Bollack, Au Jour le jour, Paris: PUF 2013, p. 203-214. (A1.72, B 6, B 143.)

Bollack, Jean & Balaudé, Jean-François, Empédocle d’Agrigente, in: Encyclopédie philosophique universelle III/1: Les Oeuvres, ed. J.-F. Mattéi, Paris: P.U.F. 1992, p. 124-127.

Bollack, Mayotte, La Chaîne aimantine, Lucrèce et ses modèles grecs, in: Revue des études latines 41, 1963, p. 165-185 (A 89).

Bonnard, Jean-Baptiste, Le Complexe de Zeus: Représentations de la paternité en Grèce ancienne, Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne 2004. (B 63, B 66, A 81.)

Booth, Nathaniel B., Empedocles’ account of breathing, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 80, 1960, p. 10-15.

– Aristotle on Empedocles B 100, in: Hermes 103, 1975, p. 373-375. (B 100.)

– A Mistake to be avoided in the Interpretation of Empedocles fr. 100, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 96, 1976, p. 147-148. (B 100.)

Bordigoni, Carlitria, Empedocle e la dizione omerica, in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, a cura di L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 199-289. (B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 27, B 29, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 39, B 40, B 42, B 45, B 51, B 61, B 62, B 70, B 73, B 74, B 83, B 84, B 85, B 86, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 101, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 111.)

Borkowski, Zbigniew, Local Cults and Resistance to Christianity, in: The Journal of Juristic Papyrology 20, 1990, p. 25-30 (about non-Christian cults in Achmim where the Pap. Strasb. was written).

Borman, Karl, Parmenides. Untersuchungen zu den Fragmenten, Hamburg 1971.

Bornheim Gerd A.(ed.), Os filósofos Pré–socráticos. São Paulo: Cultrix 1967.

Börtzler, Friedrich, Zu den antiken Chaoskosmogonien, in: Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 28 (1930), p. 253-268 (p. 262-267: on influence of Empedoclean roots in the form of the primordial disordered mixture on the Roman interpretation of Hesiodic Chaos; brief notices of B 8, B 16, B 17, B 28).

Bossi, Beatriz & Thomas M. Robinson (ed.), Plato’s Sophist revisited, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013 (Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volumes, 19).

– Plato’s Statesman revisited, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2018, (Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volumes, 68).

Boulogne, Jacques, Plutarque exégète d’Empédocle. Une leçon de lecture, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, 22, 2, 2004, p. 97-110. (B 8, B 9, B 11, B 15.)

Boussoulas, Nicolas-Isidore, Essai sur la structure du mélange dans la pensée présocratique. Héraclite, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 60, 3, 1955, p. 287-298. (B 26, B 110.)

Essai sur la structure du mélange dans la pensée présocratique. Empédocle, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale 63, 2/3, 1958, p. 135-148.  (B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 16, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 24, B 27, B 26, B 35, B 62, B 71, B 89, B 90, B 96, B 98, B 107, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 132, B 134, B 135, B 146, B 147. Sphairos as total fusion of the elements. Heraclitus, Anaxagoras.)

– La structure du mélange dans la pensée antique, in: Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 19, 1960, p. 481-498. (Emp.: p. 482-483.)

– La structure du mélange dans la pensée de Parménide, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 69, 1, 1964, p. 1-13. (Philotès and Neikos. B 8, B 9, B 26, B 27a, B 27, B 28, B 35, B 36.)

Bovet, Pierre, Le dieu de Platon d’après l’ordre chronologique des dialogues, Genève-Paris: H. Kündig & F. Alcan 1902.

Boyancé, Pierre, Sur quelques vers de Virgile (Georg. II v. 490-2), in: Revue archéologique 25/5, 1927, p. 361-379.

– Les deux démons personnels dans l’antiquité grecque et latine, in: Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 61, 1935, p. 189-202. (P. 199-200 : B 122.)

– Le Culte des Muses chez les philosophes grecs, Paris 1937, chap. VI (A 15). 

Brague,Rémi, The Body of Speech: A New Hypothesis in the Compositional Structure of Timaeus’ Monologue, in: Platonic Investigations, ed. Dominic J.O’Meara, Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press 1985, p.53-83,(Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 13). (Pages 57-58: B 29,B 134.)

Brague Rémi, Freudenthal Gad, Ni Empédocle, ni Plotin : pour le dossier du pseudo-Empédocle arabe, in: Agonistes - Essays in honour of Denis O'Brien, (ed.) J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 267-283. Reprint London - New York: Routledge 2017.

Brandis, Christian August, Bemerkungen über die Reihenfolge der Ionischen Physiologen und über einzelne ihrer Lehre, in: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 3, 1, 1829, p. 107-147. 

– Handbuch der Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Philosophie, I, Berlin: G. Reimer 1835. (Empedokles: p. 188-232).

– Geschichte der Entwicklungen der griechischen Philosophie und ihrer Nachwirkungen im römischen Reiche, I, Berlin: G. Reimer 1862. (Empedokles: p. 103-119).

–  Empedocles, in: W. Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology, 1870, volume 2, Boston: Little, Brown, and company, p. 12-14.

Bremer, Dieter, Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher, in: Poetica 12, 1980, p. 350-376.

– Hölderlin, Homer und Empedokles: Der Dichter-Philosoph als Seher und seine griechischen Vorbilder, in: Begegnung mit dem “Fremden”. Akten des internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses, hrsg. von E. Iwasaki & Sch. Yoshinori, Tokyo-Munich 1991, p. 349-361 (probably an art-historical article).

Bremmer, Jan N., The Early Greek Concept of the Soul, Princeton University Press 19934 (19831).

– The Rise and Fall of the Afterlife, London - New York : Routledge 2002. (B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 139, B 147, Pap. Strasb. aii7, d5-6.)

– Balaam, Mopsus and Melampous: Tales of Traveling Seers, in: van Kooten, Geurt Hendrik – van Ruiten, Jacques (ed.), The Prestige of the Pagan Prophet Ballam in Judaism, Early Christianity and Islam, Leiden: Brill, 2008, p. 49–67 (printed also in: J. Bremmer, Greek Religion and Culture, the Bible, and the Ancient Near East, Leiden: Brill 2008, p. 133–151, p. 65-66. (E. as a seer and purifier.)

– The Place of Performance of Orphic Poetry (OF 1), in: Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic Fragments in Honour of Alberto Bernabé, ed. Miguel Herrero de Jáurequi et alii, Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter 2011, p. 1-6. (P. 2, n. 7: Empedocles, heavily influenced by the Orphics, borrowed from them the verses B 3.3-5 DK; a short mention without argumentation.)

Brémond, Mathilde, Empédocle chez Hippolyte de Rome, mémoire de Master II, Lettres Classiques et Philosophie, Université Paris IV Sorbonne, 2011-2012.

Bréton, Guillaume, Essai sur la poésie philosophique en Grèce, Xénophane, Parménide, Empédocle, Paris: Hachette 1882, p. 177-257.

Brieger, Adolf, Das atomistische System durch Correctur des anaxagoreischen Entstanden, in: Hermes 36, 1901, p. 161-181, p. 170-172 (Empedocles was not any atomist)

Brink, C. O., Horace and Empedocles´ Temperature. A rejected Fragment of Empedocles, in: Phoenix 23, 1969, p. 138-142. (A 162).

Brisson, Luc, Le corps “dionysiaque” : L'anthropogonie décrite dans le Commentaire sur le Phédon de Platon (1, par. 3-6) attribué à Olympiodore est-elle orphique?, in: ΣΟΦΙΗΣ ΜΑΙΗΤΟΡΕΣ Chercheurs de sagesse. Hommage à Jean Pépin, Collection des Études Augustiniennes, Série Antiquité-131, Paris: 1992, p. 481-499.  B 115 related to De esu carnium I, 996 b-c.

Broadie, Sarah, Rational theology, in: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 225-249. (Emp.: p. 216-220, B 17, B 29, B 134.)

Brown, Geoffrey, The Cosmological theory of Empedocles, in: Apeiron 18, 1984, p. 97-101.

Brown, Robert D., Lucretian Ridicule of Anaxagoras, in: The Classical Quarterly, 33, 1983, p. 146-160. (Emp., p. 148-149; B 6.)

Brown, T. S., The Greek Exiles: Herodotus’ Contemporaries, in: Ancient World 17, 1988, p. 17-28 (Anaxagoras, Empedocles).

Brun, Jean, Empédocle ou le Philosophe de l’amour et de la haine : présentation, choix de textes, traduction et bibliographie, Paris: Seghers 1966, (Philosophes de tous les temps, 27). (A study plus the translation of the fragments and some testimonies.)

– Chapitre V Empédocle, in: Les Présocratiques, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1968, (Coll. "Que sais-je ?", 1319), p. 85-104. New edition in 2003, p. 81-99.  

Büchel, Carl, Die Lehre von der elementaren Zusammensetzung der Körper in ihrer Entwicklung von Empedokles bis Lavoisier, Druck von M. Becker, Düren 1876.

Buchheim, Thomas, Maler, Sprachbildner: Zur Verwandtschaft des Gorgias mit Empedokles, in: Hermes 113.4, 1985, p. 417-429.

– Die Vorsokratiker: ein philosophisches Porträt, Munich: C.H. Beck 1994. (Chap. V: Die Wurzeln des Wachstums: Empedokles von Akragas, p. 145-182; p. 37, 239-241. B 6.)

– Sterbliche Unsterbliche. Über die Lage des Menschen in der vorsokratischen Philosophie, in: Philosophische Anthropologie in der Antike, ed. Ludger, J. & Ch. Jedan, Francfort: Ontos Verlag 2010, (Topics in Ancient Philosophy, Themen der antiken Philosophie, 5), p. 31-68. (Emp.: p. 53-68. B 2, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 23, B 106, B 107, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 124, B 136.)

Bucur Bogdan G., Bucur Cristina, The Place of Splendor and Light: Observations on the Paraphrasing of Enn 4.8.1 in the Theology of Aristotle", in: Le Muséon 119 (2006): 271-292.

http://www.bgbucur.com/PDFuri/Museonart.pdf  . (Arabic Plotinus - B 115.)

Bueno, Gustavo, Empédocles y Anaxágoras, in: La metafísica presocrática, Oviedo: Pentalfa 1974, p. 281-326. (Historia de la Filosofía, nº 1)

 http://www.fgbueno.es/med/dig/gb74mp4.pdf   http://www.fgbueno.es/gbm/gb74mp.htm

Buffière, Félix, Les Mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1956, (Collection d’études anciennes). Reprint Les Belles Lettres: 1973. (B 6, B 120, B 126, B 127, B 137, B 139.)

– (ed.) Héraclite. Allégories d’Homère. Texte établi et traduit par Félix Buffière, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1962, (Collection des Universités de France). (B 6.)

Buhl, Maria Sophia, Untersuchungen zu Sprache und Stil des Empedokles (diss.), Heidelberg 1956.

Burkert, Walter, ΓΟΗΣ. Zur griechischen Schamanismus, in: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 105, 1, 1962, p. 36-55.

– (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt-Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1969.

– Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, tr. by. E. L. Minar, Jr, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press 1972. (Weisheit und Wissenschaft, Nüremberg: H. Carl 1962). (A 30, A 50, A 56, A 62, A 75, A 83, B 27, B 44, B 48, B 96, B 111, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 129, B 141, B 153a.)

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle II-III, 1969, in: Gnomon 44, 5, 1972, p. 433-42 (important).

– Review of G. Zuntz, Persephone, in: Gnomon 46, 4, 1974, p. 321-8, p. 324-5 (B 137.2, B 121.3.)

– Plotin, Plutarch und die platonisierende Interpretation von Heraklit und Empedokles, in: Kephalaion. Studies in Greek Philosophy and its Continuation offered to C.J. de Vogel, ed. J. Mansfeld - L. M. de Rijk, Assen: Van Gorcum 1975, (Wijsgerige texten en studies, 23), p. 137-146.

– Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981, in: Museum Helveticum, 41, 4, 1984, p. 246. 

– Diels Vorsokratiker: Rückschau und Ausblick, in: Hermann Diels (1848-1922) et la science de l’Antiquité, Vandoeuvres-Genève 1999, (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, 45), p. 169-206.

–  Die Griechen und der Orient. Von Homer bis zu den Magiern, Munich: C. H. Beck 2003. (Emp.: p. 125-126. Emp. and the Orient; the possible knowledge of the Eastern texts is undetectable in Empedocles and only tiny useful for interpretation of his philosophy.)

Burnet, John, Early Greek Philosophy, London-Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black 18921; London: Adam and Charles Black 19082; London: Adam and Charles Black 19203, London: Macmillan 19304. Reprints in New York: Meridian books library edition, 1957, 1958.

French translation by A. Reymond, John Burnet. L’aurore de la philosophie grecque, Paris: Payot & Cie 1919. Translation from 19082. Reprints: 1952, 1970. (Emp.: 18921, p. 207-271; 19082, p. 227-289; 19203, p. 197-250; 19304, p. 197-250.)

– Greek Philosophy: Thales to Plato, London: Macmillan 1914. (Several reprints. Empedocles: p. 71-75. B 100.) 

Burnyeat, Miles F., Empedocles Scholarship (Author’s Response to Letter of Catherine Osborne), in: The Times Literary Supplement June 11, 1999, p. 17.

Bussanich, John, Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient Philosophy, in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review 97.10.19.

http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/1997/97.10.19 

–  Reincarnation and Salvation inMagna Graecia and Plato, in: Philosopher Kings and Tragic Heroes: Essays onImages and Ideas from Western Greece, ed. Reid H.L., Tanasi D., Sioux City:Parnassos Press 2016, p. 79-92. (Empedocles's Eschatology at pages 81-84.)

Butler, James Eric, Effluvia: Empedocles Studies, in: Epoché 9/2, 2005, p. 215-231. (B 3, B 6, B 17.3-5, B 21-5, B 35, B 84, B 89, B 100.)

Byk, Samuel Alexander, Die vorsokratische Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer organischen Gliederung dargestellt. Erster Theil, Leipzig: 1876. (P. 147-190)

Byl, Simon, Le vocabulaire de l’intelligence dans le chapitre 35 du livre I du traité du ‘Régime’, in: Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 76/2, 2002, p. 217-24. The chapter of the Hippocratic treatise sets out to classify men according to different categories of intelligence ; its precedents are to be found in Empedocles, and it was read by Plato and by the author of Alcibiades II, which follows it very closely. The psychological vocabulary is particularly rich, with six hapax legomena and six words that occur nowhere else in the Hippocratic corpus.

CCC

Calabi, Francesca, Il mito di Er: le fonti, in: Platone. La Repubblica, traduzione e commento, a cura di Mario Vegetti, Vol. VII, Libro X, Naples: Bibliopolis 2007, p. 277-310.  (B 115, B 117, B 121, B 127.)

Calame, Claude, Procédures hymniques dans les vers des sagescosmologues : pragmatique de la poésie didactique (d’Hésiode et Théognis àEmpédocle et Parménide), in: Hymnes de la Grèce antique : Approcheslittéraires et historiques – Actes du colloque international de Lyon,19-21 juin 2008, ed. R. Bouchon, P. Brillet-Dubois, N. Le Meur-Weissman, Lyon:Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée 2012, p. 59-77. (See Empédocle : voixd’autorité divine et publique, p.  67-74; B 1, B 3, B 112, B 131.)

–  Procedure inniche nei versi dei sophoi cosmologi. Pragmatica della poesia didascalica (da Esiodo e Teognidea Empedocle e Parmenide), in: Mythologeîn : mito e forme di discorso nel mondo antico : studi in onoredi Giovanni Cerri, ed. A. Gostoli - R. Velardi, Pisa: Fabrizio Serra editore 2014, (AION. Quaderni ; 18), p. 151-159.

Calderini, Aristide, Ancora di un epigramma attribuito ad Empedocle e tradotto da Francesco Filelfo, in: Athenaeum (Pavia) 3, 1915, p. 41-46. (B 161.)

Calogero, Guido, L’eleatismo di Empedocle, in: Studi in onore di Luigi Castiglioni, I, Firenze: G. C. Sansoni 1960, p. 127-167.

Calzolari, Alessandro, Empedocle, Frr. 2 e 3 Diels-Kranz, in: Studi classici e orientali 34, 1984, p. 71-81. (B2, B3.)

Cameron, Alister, The Pythagorean background of the theory of recollection, Menasha (Wisconsin) 1938. (B 129: p. 20-21.)

Campailla, Sergio, La leggenda di Empedocle, in: Studia Phoenicia and East Mediterranean in the First Millenium B. C., ed. E. Lipinski, Leuven 1987, p. 659-670.

Campbell, Gordon Lindsay,  Zoogony and Evolution in Plato's Timaeus: The Presocratics, Lucretius and Darwin,  in: Reason and necessity. Essays on Plato's Timaeus, M.R. Wright (ed.), London: Duckworth, The Classical Press of Wales, 2000, p. 145-180. (Empedocles: p. 149-152: fr. 57, 59, 61, 71, a(ii) 23-30.)

–  Fragments and "The Ruin of Time", 2003 (on line).  This paper examines the way in which poets, historians and philosophers use the topos of eternal flux, and seeks to apply some lessons learned from them to the editing and interpretation of philosophical fragments. (B 11, B 15, B 17, B 111)  http://eprints.nuim.ie/97/1/The_ruin_of_time.pdf

–  Empedocles divided, in: The Classical Review, 55 (1), 2005, p. 12-13. (Review of J. Bollack's book on Empédocle, les Purifications.)

–  Empedocles (of Acragas), in: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/empedocl.htm, 2006.

–  "And bright was the flame of their friendship" (Empedocles B130): humans, animals, justice, and friendship, in Lucretius and Empedocles, in: Leeds International Classical Studies, 7.4, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/2008/200804.pdf, December 2008, p. 1-23. (B 115, d MP, B 117, B 112, B 146, B 147, B 137, B 136, B 128, B 130.)

– Lucretius, Empedocles, and Cleanthes, in: The Philosophizing Muse: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on Roman Poetry, (Pierides, 3), ed. M. Garani - D. Konstan, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2014, p. 26-60.

Cañas Quirós, Roberto, La estructura de la materia en los filósofos pluralistas pre-socráticos, in: InterSedes, XIII, 25, 2012, p. 143-168, on-line:

 http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/666/66623936008.pdf  

or http://www.intersedes.ucr.ac.cr/ojs/index.php/intersedes/article/viewFile/331/322  (P. 144-154.)

Canivet, Pierre (ed., trans.), Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques. Texte critique, introduction, traduction et notes de P. C., s. j., Paris: Les éditions du cerf 1958, (Sources chrétiennes, 57). 

Čanyšev see after Curletto.

Capelle, Wilhelm, Zur Geschichte der griechischen Botanik, in: Philologus 69/4, 1910, p. 264-291. (B 77, B 78.)

– Die Vorsokratiker, die Fragmente und Quellenberichte übersetzt und eingeleitet von W. C., Leipzig, 1935 (Stuttgart: A. Kröner 19382, 19534), (In reprint 1986, (Kröners Taschenausgabe, 119), Emp. p. 181-249.)

– Empedokles von Agrigent - Über die Natur der Seelen. Empedocles-Zitate und Kommentar in der Übersetzung von W. Capelle mit von Hand gedr. Holzschn. von Wilhelm Neufeld, Methusalem  Presse 1988.

Capizzi, Antonio, Several comments in: Zeller, E. - Mondolfo, R. La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico. Parte I : I Presocratici. Volume V : Empedocle, Atomisti, Anassagora. A cura di Antonio Capizzi, Firenze: La nuova Italia 1969. See review by Brunschwig J. in: Revue des Études Grecques, 1970, 83, 394,  p. 252-253.

– Trasposizioni del lessico omerico in Parmenide ed Empedocle. Osservazioni su un problema di metodo, in: Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica, 25, 1, 1987, p. 107-118. (B. 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 35, B 42.3, B 43, B 44, B 47, B 55, B 57.3, B 100, B 110.)

Cardullo, R. Loredana, Empedocle πυθαγορικός. Un’“invenzione” neoplatonica? in: λόγον διδόναι. La filosofia come esercizio del render ragione. Studi in onore di Giovanni Casertano, ed. Lidia Palumbo, Napoli: Loffredo 2011, p. 817-839.

Carlini, Francesco, Lettera al Compilatore dell’estratto della Vita di Empedocle, in: Biblioteca Italiana 3, 1816, p. 73-5 = P. Giordani, Opere, a cura di A. Gussalli, Milano 1857, X.38-40 (a reaction on some theses of Scinà’s book concerning to scientific nature of fr. B 100).

Carrizosa, Diana, El pensamiento de Empédocles a partir de sus versos, Medellín (Colombia) : Universidad EAFIT, 2003, (Bordes de Vida).

Caruso, Valentina, Empedocle, ‘figura di frontiera’, in: Vichiana. Rassegna di Studi filologici e Storici IV serie, XII 1/2010, p. 99-114. (Review of Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli, 2007.)

– Empedocle: una duplice cosmogonia, una duplice etica, in: Vichiana. Rassegna di Studi filologici e Storici IV serie, XIV 1/2012, p. 94-105. (Review of Empedocle d’Agrigento, Napoli 2010, by Federica Montevecchi.)

Casadio, Giovanni., La metempsicosi tra Orfeo e Pitagora, in: Orphisme et Orphée, en l'honneur de Jean Rudhardt, ed. Ph. Borgeaud, Genève: Droz 1991, (Recherches et Rencontres, 3), p. 119-155. (B 126, Plut. De esu.)

Casanova, Angelo, Alfredo, La critica di Diogene d’Enoanda alla metempsicosi Empedoclea (NF 2 + fr. 34 Ch.), in: Studi in onore di Adelmo Barigazzi I-II, Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo 1986, I, p. 51-72. And in: Sileno, 10, 1, 1984, p. 119-130.  (A 99.)

Casertano, Giovanni, Amore e morte in Empedocle, in: Giornale di metafisica 21, 1999, p. 51-65.

– Orfismo e pitagorismo in Empedocle?, in: Tra Orfeo e Pitagora, a cura di Marisa Tortorelli Ghidini - Alfredina Storchi Marino - Amedeo Visconti, Napoli: Bibliopolis 2000, p. 195-236.

– (ed.), Empedocle : tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli: Loffredo 2007.

–  Une volta fui arbusto e muto pesce del mare, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 331-337.

– I presocratici, Roma: Edizioni Carocci, 2009, (Pensatori. 4). (Chap. 6. Empedocle - Pluralisti contro monisti ? La vista e gli scritti. Le radici, il cosmo e il mondo. Sensazione, pensiero e conoscenza. Il dio, l'anima e la reincarnazione.)

Casini, Paolo, Zoogonia e transformismo nella fisica epicurea, in: Giornale critico della filosofia italiana 42, 1963, p. 178-207. (Emp.: p. 186-197.)

Castelletti, Cristiano, Porfirio. Sullo Stige, Testo greco a fronte. Introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati di C. C., Milano: Bompiani 2006, (Testi a Fronte, 99). (A 84, B 105.)

Castner, Catherine J., De Rerum Natura 5.101 - 3: Lucretius’ Application of Empedoclean Language to Epicurean Doctrine, in: Phoenix 41, 1987, p. 40-49.

– The ‘Fulmen’ and Sicily: Imagery in Lucretius’ Sixth Book, in: Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11, ed. C. Deroux, Bruxelles, Latomus, 2003, p. 157-176.

Caston, Victor, Empedocles’ Theory of Vision, MAthesis, University of Texas, Austin 1986.

Catarzi, Marcello, La seconda "volta". Note al frammento di Empedocle DK 31 B25, in: Incidenza dell'antico, 5, 2007, p. 145-173. (B 25)

 http://www.incidenzadellantico.it/2007_IncidAntico_%205_Abstracts.pdf 

Cataudella, Quintino, Empedoclea, in: Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 88, 1960, p. 124-132. (B 137.) 

Cavalcantede Souza, José (ed.), Os Pré-socráticos. Vida e obra, fragmentos, doxografia e comentariosseleção de textos, São Paulo: Nova Cultural 1989 (4th ed.), (Col. Os Pensadores).

Cazzaniga, Ignazio., Le metafore enniane relative a cielo e stelle ed alcuni placita di tradizione Anassimeno-Empedoclea, in: La Parola del Passato 26, 1971, p. 102-119.

Cerasuolo, Salvatore, Empedocles frigidus, in: Vichiana 8, 1979, p. 252-279. (A 162.)

Cerri, Giovanni, L’ideologia dei quattro elementi da Omero ai Presocratici, in: Annali dell’Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli 20, 1998, p. 5-58. (p. 26-32: B 6.)

– Il poema di Empedocle “Sulla natura” ed un rituale siceliota, in: Poesia e religione in Grecia: Studi in onore di G. Aurelio Privitera, ed. M. Cannatà Fera - S. Grandolini, Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane 2000, p. 205-212. (B 6.3.)

– Poemi greci arcaici sulla natura e rituali misterici: Senofane, Parmenide, Empedocle, in: Mediterraneo Antico 3/2, 2000, p. 603-619. (P. 604-613: on the mysteries celebrated in Acragas and Thurioi in honour of Nestis.)

– “Physica” e “Katharmoi” di Empedocle, in: Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 181-196. (There were three Emp. poems; B 3.1-8.)

– Empedocle, fr. 3 D.-K: saggio di esegesi letterale, in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, a cura di L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 83-94. (B 3.)

– Empedocle narratore di miti: la vicenda cosmica, in: A I O N xxviii, 2006, p. 49-63. (B 3, B 11,  B 12, B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 131.)

– Livello scientifico e livello mitico nei poemi di Empedocle, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 122-142.

Chaignet, Antelme-Édouard, Histoire de la psychologie des Grecs, Tome I: avant et après Aristote, Paris: Hachette et Cie 1887. (Chapitre douzième: Empédocle, p. 82-96)

Chapouthier, Georges, Le courant zoophile dans la pensée antique, in: Revue des questions scientifiques 161/3, 1990, p. 261-87, p. 266-7 (superficial, unprecise, without direct evidence, and dependent on unvalid literature).

Charlton, William (transl.), Philoponus. On Aristotle on the intellect (De Anima 3.4-8), translated by William Charlton, London: Gerald Duckworth 1991, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). Reprint in London-New York: Bloomsbury 2014. (B 57, B 89.)

– ‘Philoponus’. On Aristotle on the soul 3.9-13, with Stephanus. On Aristotle on the interpretation, London: Gerald Duckworth 2000, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). Reprint in London-New York: Bloomsbury 2014. 

Cherniss, Harold, Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press 1935. (A 32,B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 30, B 31, B 35,B 36, B 37, B 38, B 39, B 53, B 54, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 63, B 64, B 65, B67, B 71, B 79, B 81, B 84, B 89, B 90, B 96, B 100, B 103, B 105, B 106, B 108,B 107, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 126, B 135.)

Chitwood, Ava, The Deaths of the Greek Philosophers, Diss., Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Md. 1993. (Heraclitus, Empedocles, Democritus.)

– The Death of Empedocles, in: The American Journal of Philology 107, 2, 1986, p. 175-191.

– Death by Philosophy: the Biographical Tradition in the Life and Death of the Archaic Philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2004.

Chrysakopoulou, Vasiliki, (Sylvana), Théologie versus physique dans la poésie présocratique de Xénophane à Empédocle, Thèse de doctorat, Paris, Sorbonne (Paris IV), 2003, sous la Direction de G. Romeyer Dherbey.

Ciglenečki, Jan, Empedoklova kozmološkamisel v luči strasburških fragmentov: diplomska naloga, Ljubljana 2005. (Short degree essay.)

– Empedoklov nauk oposmrtnem preseljevanju v luči hermetičnega traktata Korē Kosmou, in: Anthropos 2007, 1-2, p. 1-24. 

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.anthropos.si/anthropos/2007/1_2/ciglenecki.pdf

Ćirković, Milan M., Ancient origins of a modern anthropic cosmological argument, in: Astronomical and astrophysical transactions, 22, 6, dec. 2003, p. 879–886. (B 21.)

Clark, Gordon Haddon, Empedocles and Anaxagoras in Aristotle’s De anima (diss.), Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania 1929.

Clarke, Michael, The wisdom of Thales and the problem of the word ΙΕΡΟΣ, in: The Classical Quarterly, 45.2, 1995, p. 296-317. (Homeric background, B 134.) 

– Flesh and spirit in the songs of Homer: a study of words and myths, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999. (Useful for Homeric background.)

Classen, Carl Joachim, Empedokles, in: Pauly-Wissowa Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Suppl. Band XII, Stuttgart 1970, p. 241-247.

Claus, David B., Toward the Soul: An Inquiry into the Meaning of ψυχή before Plato, New Haven - London: Yale University Press 1981. Chapter III.2: “Eschatological uses of ψυχή: Pythagoras, Orphism, Empedocles, p. 111-123. (B 112, B 115, B 117, B 134.)

Clay, Diskin, Lucretius contra Empedoclen: a textual note, in: Classical Journal 73, 1, 1977, p. 27-29. (A 21, B 6,  B 37.)

– Paradosis and Survival: Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy, The University of Michigan Press 1998. (P. 126-127 (B 71, B 21), p. 154-155 (B 3, B 131).

– Recovering Originals: Peri Physeos and De Rerum Natura, in: Apeiron 33/3, 2000, p. 259-271.

– Empedocles at Panopolis and Delphi, in: Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in honor of Charles Kahn, ed. R. Patterson, V. Karasmanis and A. Hermann, Las Vegas - Zurich - Athens: Parmenides Publishing 2012. p. 59-78 (Papyrus a, b, c, d Martin-Primavesi, B 3, B 17, B 20, B 76, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 131, B 133, B 139, B 140.)

Clay, Jenny Strauss, review of Empedokles Physika I- Eine Rekonstruktion - by Oliver Primavesi, in: Religious Studies Review, volume 37, 1, 2011, p. 52

Clermont - Ganneau, C., Empédocle, Les Manichéens et les Cathares, in: Journal asiatique série 9, tome 15, 1900, p. 179-186 (a Syrian work of the ninth century, which depends on Epiphanius and Scithinus, asserts the predecessors of Manicheans were Pythagoras and Empedocles).

Cleve, Felix Merori, The Giants of Pre-Sophistic Greek Philosophy: an attempt to reconstruct their thoughts, II, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 19733 (19651, 19692), p. 329-395.

– Review of H. Lambridis, Empedocles, in: Journal of the History of Philosophy 17, 1979, p. 455-457.

Cohen, S. Marc - Curd Patricia - Reeve, C.D.C. (ed.),  Readings in Ancient Greek Philosophy: from Thales to Aristotle, 4th edition, Indianapolis: Hackett 2011. (P. 52-74. Translation of the fragments by R. McKirahan, 2010.) 

Colli, Giorgio, Lezioni di storia della filosofia antica: Empedocle, Parte prima, Anno accademico 1948-49, Università degli studi di Pisa, Facultà di lettere, Pisa: Libreria 1949.

Conger, George Perrigo, Theories of macrocosms and microcosms in the history of philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press 1922. (Empedocles: p. 4-5. B 84, B 100.)

Conte, Gian Biagio, Generi e lettori, Milano 1991, p. 17-26.

Cook, Arthur Bernard, Zeus: A Study in ancient Religion, I, Zeus god of the bright sky, Cambridge: University Press 1914, p. 31-32. (B 6.)

Cordero, Nestor-Luis, Platon, Empédocle, et l’origine de l’être humain, in: Platon, source des Présocratiques: exploration, ed. M. Dixsaut - A. Brancacci, Paris, J. Vrin 2002, p. 93-106. (A 49, A 66, A 68, A 72, B 6, B 57, B 60, B 61, B 62, B 67, B 96, B 98.)

Cornavaca, Ramón, (ed.) Filósofos presocráticos. Fragmentos II, Buenos Aires: Losada 2011. 

Cornelli, Gabriele, In Search of Pythagoreanism: Pythagoreanism as an historiographical category, Berlin - Boston: De Gruyter 2013. (Chap. 3.3, 'Ten or twenty human generations' (Empedocles), p. 97-99: B 129.)

Cornford, Francis Macdonald, From Religion to Philosophy. A Study in the Origins of Western Speculation, New York-London: Longmans, Green and Co. / Edward Arnold 1912. Reprint in Princeton: Princeton University Press 1991. (Emp.: p. 63, 150-152, 224-242. A 30, B 2,  B 3, B 17, B 19, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 96, B 112,  B 113, B 114, B 115, B 117, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 128, B 130, B 134, B 135, B 146, B 147.)

– Mystery religions and pre-socratic philosophy, in: The Cambridge Ancient History, IV, The Persian Empire and the West, chapter XV, ed. J. B. Bury, S. A. Cook, F. E. Adcock, Cambridge 1926, p. 522-578, 650-653. Reprint with slight corrections in 1930. ("Empedocles", p. 563-569, section X, plus bibliography p. 652. Reprint in F. M. Cornford. selected papers of F. M. Cornford, edited with an Introduction by A. Bowen, New York-London: Garland Publishing 1987, p. 36-98. Emp.: p. 77-83.)

– Principium sapientiae: the origins of Greek philosophical thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952. (P. 5-7, 34, 56-57, 64, 121-124, 151-152, 167-168, 177. B 3, B 17, B 28, B 100, B 115, B 129, B 134.)

– Plato’s cosmology. The Timaeus of Plato, translated with a running commentary, by F. M. C., London: Routledge 1937; London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co 1937. Several reprints in London and New York. (Two hemispheres: A 30, A 56; A 74, A 83, A 89, B 17, B 29, B 61, B 84, B 96 (Bone, for example, contained four parts of fire, two of earth, one of air, and one of water), B 97, B 98, B 100, B 126. Like to like. Love and Strife. Four elements. The old seasonal ' powers' of summer and winter – the hot, the cold, the moist, the dry – … fire, air, water, and earth.)

Costa, Alexandre da Silva, Como e por que sobrevivem os pré-socráticos: os exemplos de Empédocles e Heraclito, in: Revista filosófica de Coimbra, 11, 21, 2002, p. 163-178. (Emp. Strasbourg.)

– Die Unterscheidung der parmenideischen Vernunft in den Werken des Zenons und des Empedokles. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Philosophie Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, 2009.               

http://elib.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/publications/diss/E-Diss929_thesis.pdf    http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.jsp?id=E934260

– Mito e filosofia em Empédocles. A redenção pelo saber, in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 99-110. On-line: http://www.ifcs.ufrj.br/~afc/2012/Costa.pdf  (B 17, B 115, B 128, B 136, B 137.)

Couloubaritsis, Lambros,  Histoire de la philosophie ancienne et médiévale, Paris: Grasset 1998, (Le Collège de philosophie). (Emp.: p. 137.)

– The Strasbourg Empedocles (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666), in: Diogenes 1999, p. 96-99.

– Émergence de l’individualité dans la pratique archaïche du mythe d’Homère à Empédocle, in: Hypnos, 24, 2010 (1), p. 1-23.

 http://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/hypnos/article/download/4243/2853

– Les transfigurations de la notion de physis entre Homère et Aristote, in Kriterion, nº 122, Dec./2010, p. 349-375. (B 8, B 110). http://www.scielo.br/pdf/kr/v51n122/02.pdf

Courtney, Edward, The Proem of Lucretius, in: Museum Helveticum 58, 2001, p. 201-211. (B 17.)

Covotti, Aurelio, La filosofia nella Magna Grecia e in Sicilia fino a Socrate, in: Annali delle Università Toscane, XXIII, Pisa: Vannucchi 1901. (Empedocles: p. 137-169.)

– Il mondo ‘non ingannevole’ di Empedocle e le sue ‘quattro radici’, in: Atti dell’Accademia Pontaniana di scienze morali e politiche 47, 1921, p. 63-84.

– I presocratici, sagi (Collezione di studi filosofici, serie storica, monografie no. 3), Napoli: Rondinella 1934, p. 159-187.

Cowan, Robert, Of gods, men and stout fellows: Cicero on Sallustius' Empedoclea (Q. FR. 2.10[9].3), in: The Classical Quarterly, 63, 2013, p. 764-771.

Crowley, Timothy, J., On the Use of Stoicheion in the Sense of ‘Element’, in: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, 2005, p. 367-394. (B 6, B 17.)

– Aristotle on the matter of the elements, Thesis submitted for the Degree of D. Phil. at the University of Oxford, 2009. (P. 19-20 [B 6], p. 77, 98: B 21.)

– De generatione et corruptione 2.3: does Aristotle identify the contraries as elements?, in: The Classical Quarterly, 63.1, 2013, p. 161-182. (P. 176: B 21.)

Crusius, Otto, Lobon und seine Verwandten, in: Philologus 30, 1925, p. 176-191.

Cubells, Fernando, Los filósofos presocráticos. Estudios inéditos de filosofia antigua (Empedocles: orígenes históricos de la ciencia ética), Valencia: Facultad de Teología San Vicente Ferrer 1956 (1979).

Culianu, Ioan P., Iatroi kai manteis: sulle strutture dell’estatismo greco, in: Studi Storico-religiosi 4/2, 1980, p. 287–303, p. 290-294. (E. as a shaman; the miraculous elements in his biography.)

Cumont, Franz, Recherches sur le symbolisme funéraire romain, Paris: Librairie orientaliste P. Geuthner, 1942. (P. 132-140: the later parallels of B 115.8-12 and a background of the idea; very informative text.)

Curd, Patricia, The Legacy of Parmenides. EleaticMonism and Later Presocratic Thought, Princeton:  Princeton University Press 1998 (LasVegas:  Parmenides Publishing 2004). Chapter IV 3.1 Empedocles and the roots of all things,3.2 Particles and pores, p. 155-171, plus p. 128 n.3. (A 34, A 43, A 44,A 86, A 87, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 26, B 27, B 71, B 91, B 96, B98, B 100, B 107.) 

– A New Empedocles? Implications of the Strasburg Fragments for Presocratic Philosophy, in: Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, November 2000, ed. J. J. Cleary - G. M. Gurtler, 17, 1, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill 2002, p. 27-49 and 57-59 (bibliography).

– The Metaphysics of Physics: Mixture and Separation in Empedocles and Anaxagoras, in: Presocratic Philosophy, Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. V. Caston & D. W. Graham, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company 2002, p. 139-158. (B 8, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 98, B 112, B 146.)

– On the Question of Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 137-62.

– Parmenides and after: Unity and plurality, in: A Companion to ancient philosophy, ed. M. L Gill - P. Pellegrin, Malden - Oxford - Victoria: Blackwell Publishing 2006, (Blackwell companions to philosophy), p. 34-55. (Emp.: p. 42-44.)

– A Presocratics reader: selected fragments and testimonia, edited, with introduction, by Patricia Curd; translations by R.D. McKirahan and P. Curd, 2nd edition, Indianapolis: Hackett 2011. (Emp.: p. 73-100.)

– Where are Love and Strife? Incorporeality in Empedocles, in: Early Greek Philosophy: The Presocratics and the emergence of reason, ed. J. McCoy, Washington, D.C.: CUA Press 2013, (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 57), p. 113-138. (B 2, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 30, B 33, B 35, B 36, B 71, B 73, B 96, B  98, B 109, [B 115], papyrus.)

– Powers, Structure, and Thought in Empedocles, in: Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 55-79. On-line at degruyter.com.

Curletto, Silvio, L’immaginazione e il concepimento: fortuna di una teoria embriogenetica e di un mito letterario, in: Maia 52/3, 2000, p. 533-564.

Čanyšev, A. N., Materializm Empedokla, in: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, serija filosofija 1, 1976, p. 81-90.

­– Kurs lekcij po drevnej filosofiji [Course of Lessons in Ancient Philosophy], Moskva, Vysšaja škola 1981, p. 166-170. (General and ideologically biased outline of Empedocles’ teaching without knowledge of the basic literature).

DDD

D'Alfonso, Francesca, La terra desolata. Osservazioni sul destino di Bellerofonte (Il. 6, 200-202), in: Museum Helveticum 65, 2008, p.  1-21. (B 115. See Abstract page Abstracts and summaries.)

Darcus, Shirley Muriel Louise, Daimon parallels the holy phrèn in Empedocles, in: Phronesis 22, 3, 1977, p. 175-190. (B 134.)

Darcus Sullivan, Shirley Muriel Louise, The Nature of Phren in Empedocles, in: Studi di filosofia preplatonica, a cura di M. Capasso - F. De Martino - P. Rosati, Napoli: Bibliopolis 1985, p. 119-136. (B 5, B 15, B 17, B 23, B 110, B 114, B 133, B 134, B 138.) 

Davies, C., Empedocles of Acragas, in: History To-day 21, 1971, p. 708-714. (Very sketchy and too general study on Emp. life and teaching.)

Decharme, Paul, La Critique des traditions religieuses chez les Grecs, Des origines au temps de Plutarque, Paris: A. Picard et fils 1904. (P. 58-63. The author denies the existence of all traditional gods in Emp. including of those in B 6 and B 134, there are only long-lived daimones. B 6, B 115, B 128, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 137.)

Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda, The Strasbourg Text of the Works of Empedocles, in: Rivista di storia della filosofia 55, 2000, p. 691-694. (Review of Martin - Primavesi, 1999.)

Defradas, Jean, Un nouvel Empédocle, in: Revue des études grecques 86, 1973, p. 212-223.

Degani, E., Empedocle B 16.2 D.- Kr., in: Quaderni dell’istituto di filologia greca 2, 1967, p. 6-7. (B 16.)

De Azevedo Vianna, S. B., Empédocles e o pluralismo grego, in: Kriterion 25/72, 1984, p. 125-143.

De Cecco, Daniela, Guerra e giustizia nella filosofia greca della natura: da Eraclito a Empedocle, in: La guerra : una riflessione interdisciplinare, ed. Gilda Manganaro Favaretto, Trieste : Edizioni Università di Trieste 2003,  p. 55-82, .

De Grandi, Nicola, Riferimenti Empedoclei nelle Baccanti di Euripide, in: Dioniso 65, 1995, p. 55-59. (Bacch. 1-9 = par. B 6; Bacch. 4 = B 112.4, Bacch. 917-1170 = B 137, Bacch. 1141-2 = B 127.1).

De Leo, Daniela, Empedocle, in: Michelstaedter filosofo del Frammento: con Appunti di filosofia di Carlo Michelstaedter, Lecce: Milella 2004, (Pubblicazioni del Dipartimento di filosofia e scienze sociali. Nuova serie. Saggi / Università degli studi di Lecce, 13.), p. 52-63.

Deichgräber, Karl, Review of Ernst Wenkebach, Beiträge zur Textgeschichte der Epidemienkommentare Galens, in: Gnomon 6, 1930, p. 375-376. (B 67.)

– Xenophanes Περι φύσεως, in: Rheinisches Museum 87, 1938, p. 1-31, p. 22-23. (B 2.9, B 5, B 15.3.)

Delatte, Armand, Études sur la littérature pythagoricienne, Paris: Édouard Champion 1915, p. 39-40 (B 136), 41-2, n. 62 (B 2.9, B 3), 63 (B 2.6), 72 (B 152), 77 (B 112.4), 78 (B 146-B 147) and 252 (B 6 and tetraktys, B 129).

– Les conceptions de l’enthousiasme chez les philosophes présocratiques, in: L' Antiquité Classique 3, 1, 1934, p. 5-79. (p. 21-27. Printed separately with the same pagination in Collection d’Études Anciennes, Les Belles Lettres, Paris 1934; A 98, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 134.)

– Les harmonies dans l’embryologie hippocratique, in: Mélanges P. Thomas, Bruges 1930, p. 160-171.

Delcourt, Marie, Chapitre V. Les Fléaux en Sicile au temps d’Empédocle, in: Stérilités mystérieuses et naissances maléfiques dans l’antiquité classique, Liège: Librairie E. Droz 1938, (Bibliothèque de la faculté de philosophie et lettres, fasc. 83). Reprint Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1986, p. 83-88, Liége: Presses universitaires de Liège 1986, & OpenEditionBooks 2013. 

http://books.openedition.org/pulg/658 

(chap. V “Les fléaux en Sicile au temps d’Empédocle”; Emp. as a tamer ofwinds, a healer of plague and a baren woman: A 2, A 14; these stories arederived from B 111.2-3).

– Hermaphrodite. Mythes et rites de la Bisexualité dans l’Antiquité classique, Paris: PUF 1958. (P. 115: on possible influence of Empedoclean zoogony - A 72, B 57 - B 63 - on Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s Symposion with an general analysis of the background of the whole myth).

– Pyrrhos et Pyrrha, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1965. (P. 69-70. A 1, par. 68-69: immortalization of E. by help of fire.)

de Ley, Herman, Empedocles’ Sexual Theory: a note on fragment B 63, in: L’Antiquité classique, 47, 1, 1978, p. 153-162. (A 72, A 81, B 61, B 62, B 63.)

– Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981, in: L’Antiquité Classique, 54, 1985, p. 343-344. 

della Corte, Francesco, Gli Empedoclea e Ovidio, in: Maia 37, 1985, p. 3-12.

Demand, Nancy, Pindar’s Olympian 2. Theon’s Faith and Empedocles’ Katharmoi, in: Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 16, 1975, p. 347-357.

de Miro, Ernesto, Società e arte nell'età di Empedocle, in: Elenchos 19/2, 1998, p. 325-344. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.)

Derenne J-Ph., Debru A., Grassino A.E., Whitelaw W.A., The earliest History of diaphragm physiology, in: European Respiratory Journal, 1994, 7, p. 2234–2240.  http://www.yogagardensf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/diaphragm-1.pdf   http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/12/2234.long  http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/12/2234.full.pdf  (B 100.)

– History of diaphragm physiology: the achievements of Galen, in: European Respiratory Journal, 1995, 8, p. 154–160.

 http://www.ersj.org.uk/content/8/1/154.full.pdf  

de Romilly, Jacqueline, Gorgias et le pouvoir de la poésie, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 93, 1973, p. 155-162.

de Rubeis, Maria Grazia, Ripetizioni nel ΠΕΡΙ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ di Empedocle, in: Studi Classici e Orientali, 41, 1991, p. 87-93. (B 26, B 20, B 17, B 71.)

DeSanctis, Dino, La Musa πολυμνηστη: Penelope nella poetica di Empedocle(fr. 3 DK), in: StudiClassici e Orientali, LIII , 2007 (published in2010), p. 11-30. (B 3.)

De Santoro Moreira, Fernando, José, Αllégories et rondeaux philosophiques dans le Poème de la Nature d’Empédocle, in: χώρα REAM, 11, 2013, p. 183‑200.

– Empédocles, Aristóteles e os elementos, in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6,12, 2012, p. 39-55. Released in October 2014. (A 37, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 22, B 71, B 82, B 90, B 111, B 117.)

http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1452/1293

Deschamps, Lucienne, 'Victrix Venus'. Varron et la cosmologie empédocléenne, in: Beiträge zur altitalischen Geistesgeschichte: Festschrift für Gerhard Radke zum 18. Februar 1984, ed. R. Altheim-Stiehl & M. Rosenbach, Münster-Westfalen: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung 1986, p. 51-72.

– Le chant V du De rerum natura de Lucrèce et Varron de Reate. in: Vita Latina, 151, 1998, p. 6-18.

Des Georges, A., La réincarnation des âmes selon les traditions orientales et occidentales, Paris: Albin Michel 1966. (Emp.: p. 69-72. Fragments translated by Voilquin.)

De Smet, Daniel, The Influence of the Arabic Pseudo-Empedocles on Medieval Latin Philosophy: Myth or Reality? in: Across the Mediterranean Frontiers: Trade, Politics and Religion 650-1450, ed. D. Agius & I. Netton, Turnhout 1997, p. 225-234.

– Empedocles Arabus. Une lecture néoplatonicienne tardive,  Brussel: Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België 1998, (Klasse der Letteren, 165). (Cf. the reviews by M. Rashed, in: Elenchos, 2001, 2, p. 440-444,  S. I. Stroumsa, in: Journal of the American Oriental Society 122, January 2002, p. 94-97; and J. Janssens, in: Tijdschrift voor filosofie 63, 2001, p. 405-406. B 115.)

– Empedocles, p. 142-144,  http://www.brill.nl/files/brill.nl/specific/downloads/24186-Empedocles.pdf  

Des Places, Edouard, La religion grecque, Paris: A et J. Picard 1969, p. 187-191. (B 29, B 17, B 21, B 109, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 134.)

Despotopoulos [Δεσποτόπουλος], Konstantinos I., Θέματα φιλοσοφίας του Εμπεδοκλέους, in: Πρακτικα της Ακαδημίας Αθηνων  67, 1992, p. 192-202. (B 3.9-13, B 110 etc.)

– Φιλοσοφικά και διαλεκτικά: Μελετήματα, Θεσσαλονίκη 1990. (Emp.: p. 80-87)

Detienne, Marcel, Xénocrate et la démonologie pythagoricienne, in: Revue des Études Anciennes, 60, 3-4, 1958, p. 271-279. 

La ‘Démonologie’ d’Empédocle, in: Revue des études grecques, 72, 1959, p. 1-17. (B 115, B 21, B 146, B 112, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 126.)

– La notion de daïmôn dans le pythagorisme ancien, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1963.  Reprint 2021, (Anagôgê, 14). (The moon: p. 105-111, 140-144. Emp.: p. 79-85. B 111, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 129, B 146.)

Deussen, Paul, Die Philosophie der Griechen, Leipzig 1921, p. 106-124. 

De Vogel, Cornelia J., Greek philosophy, a collection of texts selected and supplied with some notes and explanations by C.J. De Vogel, Volume 1, Thales to Plato, second edition, Leiden: E. J. Brill 1957². (First edition: Brill 1950. Emp.: p. 51-64.)

De Waele, Jozef Arthur, Acragas Graeca : Die historische Topographie des griechischen Akragas auf Sizielen, I. Historischer Teil, ’s-Gravenhage: 1971. (P. 33, 204-205, p. 289: Taffel V.  B 123.2.)

Dezeimeris, Jean-Eugène, De quelques ouvrages retrouvés d’Empédocle, de Démocrite et de Diogène d’Apollonie, in: Le Moniteur Universel, Paris 1846, coll. 1647c - 1648a, 1702b - 1703a, 1717c - 1718b (The third part which concentrates only on Empedocles was published also in Séances et travaux de l’académie des sciences morales et politiques 9, 1846, p. 199-224.) 

Diano, Carlo, Empedocle. L'eredità di Parmenide e dei Pitagorici, - Mitizzazione del principio del movimento, - L'escatologia di Empedocle, p. 72-76, in: Il pensiero greco da Anassimandro agli stoici. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri 2007. (Series 1: Nuova cultura; 156.)

Diels, Hermann, Critica, in: Commentationes in honorem Francisci Buecheleri Hermanni Useneri editae a Societate Philologa Bonnensi, Bonnae 1873, p. 61-7, p. 65-66. (B 42.)

– Doxographi Graeci, Collegit, recensuit, Prolegomenis Indicibusque instruxit Hermannus Diels, Berlin:  G. Reimer 1879.

– Studia Empedoclea, in: Hermes 15, 1880, p. 161-179. (B 12, B 21.13-14, B 26.3-7, B 52, B 54, B 22, B 37, B 96, B 76, B 20, B 61, B 67, B 84, B 133, B 137, B 143.)

– Gorgias und Empedokles, in: Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1884 (1), 19, p. 343-368. (= in: Sophistik, ed. C. J. Classen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1976, p. 351-383; B 21, B 84.)

– Sibyllinische Blätter, Berlin: G. Reimer 1890. (B 112, B 143.)

– Pseudonaevianum, in: Rheinisches Museum 49, 1894, p. 478. (B 121.2.)

– Über ein Fragment des Empedokles, in: Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 49, 1897(2), p. 1062-1073. (B 142; published also separately as a Sonderabdruck of SPAW, 12 p. – Reprint in W. Burkert (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt 1969, p. 147-158. )

– Über die Gedichte des Empedokles, in: Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 31, 1898, p. 396-415. (Published also separately as a Sonderdruck of SPAW, 20 p.  – Reprint in W. Burkert (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt 1969, p. 127-146.] ).

– Symbola Empedoclea, in: Mélanges Henri Weil, Paris : A. Fontemoing 1898, p. 125-130. (B 115.1, 4 et 5-7, B 143, B 61.)

– Poetarum philosophorum fragmenta, (Poetarum Graecorum fragmenta, III, 1), Berlin: Weidmann 1901. (P. 74-168; Hildesheim: Weidmann 20002 .)

– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Vierte Auflage. Erster Band, Berlin: Weidmann 19224 (1903, 1st ed. ; 1906, 2nd ed. ; 1912, 3rd ), Band I, p. 193-283, and appendix p. XXX-XXXIII.

Diels, Hermann & Kranz, Walther, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Fünfte Auflage herausgegeben von Walther Kranz. Erster Band,  Berlin: Weidmann 19345. (Emp.: p. 276-375, without "Nachtrag" (however see in Band II, p. 419-424. = DK5.)

– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Herausgegeben von Walther Kranz. Erster Band, Berlin: Weidmann 19516. (Reprint of 19345 with a "Nachtrag". Completed in February 1951, published by Weidmann in Berlin (Grunewald, printing in Berlin-West SO 36 by Lindemann und Lüdecke) 19516 = DK6or simply DK. Many reprints. Berlin: Weidmann 19547 [...] Zürich-Hildesheim: Weidmann 198918, 199219 etc. Emp.: p. 276-375 and 498-501.

– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band III (Wortindex von W. Kranz. Namen- und Stellenregister von H. Diels ergänzt von W. Kranz), Berlin: Weidmann 19375,

– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band III (Wortindex von Walther Kranz. Namen- und Stellenregister von H. Diels ergänzt von W. Kranz), Zürich-Hildesheim: Weidmann 19526, (Many reprints.) [Band II is dated also 1952.] 

Diès, Auguste, L’évolution de la théologie dans les philosophes grecs III. D’Empédocle à Socrate, in: Revue d’histoire et de littérature religieuses, 11, 1906, p. 320-352 (Emp.: p. 325-335) =  http://gallica.bnf.fr/document?O=N036448  . (General sketch of Emp. teaching which was heavily influenced by H. Diels. B 31, B 28, B 29, B 115, B 133, B 134, B 146, B 147.)

– Le Cycle mystique : la divinité, origine et fin des existences individuelles dans la philosophie antésocratique, Paris: F. Alcan 1909, (Collection historique des grands philosophes), p. 83-99. (B 6, B 11, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 116, B 117, B 121, B 127, B 128, B 130, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 144, B 146, B 147.)

Dieterich,  Albert, Nekyia, Leipzig 1893, p. 119. (B 115.6.)

Dietrich, Ernst Ludwig, Der Urmensch als Androgyn, in: Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 58, dritte Folge IX, Heft III-IV, 1939, p. 297-345. (P. 299-301: sphairos as an androgynous god: B 27, B 28, B 30, B 134; influence of Empedocles on Aristophanes’s speech in Plato’s Symposion.).

Di Giovanni, Piero, L’Empedocle di Freud, in: Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto 1989, p. 173-184.

– Empedocle e le quattro radici del mondo, in: P. Di Giovanni, La storia della filosofia nell'età classica : dal VII secolo a.C. al II secolo d.C. Milano: FrancoAngeli 2013, p. 125-134. (B 6.)

Diller, Hans, ΟΨΙΣ ΑΔΗΛΩΝ TA ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΑ, in: Hermes 67, 1932, p. 14-15. (B 84.)

– Προθέλυμνος, in: Philologus 97, 1948, p. 361-363. (B 21.)

Dillon, John, Empedocles' cosmic cycle in the later platonist tradition, in: Agonistes - Essays in honour of Denis O'Brien, (ed.) J. 

Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 227-234. Reprint London - New York: Routledge 2017.

Di Marco, Massimo, La metensomatosi in Empedocle, in: Filosofia e società, 4, 1995, p. 31-58. Reimpr. in: M. di Marco, Sapienza italica: studi su Senofane, Empedocle, Ippone, Roma: Edizioni Studium 1998, (Quaderni della Libera Università "Maria SS. Assunta" Lumsa - Roma, 13), p. 33-68.

Di Pasquale Barbanti, Maria, Empedocle in Plotino e in Porfirio, in: Invigilata Lucernis 22, 2000, p. 31-45. (Influenced by Plato’s and Aristotle’s views on Empedocles and they placed him ahistorically into context of Orphic and Pythagorean teachings; A 37, ad B 1154, ad B 1202, B 120, ad B 1172, B 126, B 129).

Disandro, Carlos Alberto, Filosofía y poesía en el pensar griego. Anaxágoras, Empédocles, Demócrito, La Plata: Hosteria Volante 1974. (B2, B 3, B 35, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 134.)

Ditadi, Gino, Orfeo, Pitagora, Empedocle, in: Teofrasto, Della Pietà, ed. Gino Ditadi, Este (Padova): Isonomia 2005, p. 61-91. (Bibliophilia.)

Dixsaut, Monique, L'Empedocle di Nietzsche, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 310-330.

Dodds, Eric, Robertson, The Greeks and the irrational, Berkeley: The Regents of the University of California 1951, (Sather Classical Lectures, 25). (Emp. : p. 145-156, 173-174.)

– Les Grecs et l’irrationnel, traduit de l’anglais par M. Gibson, Paris: Flammarion 1977, (Champs, 28). (Emp.: p. 149-158, p. 173-176.)

Dolce, Lodovico, Empedocle philosopho, p. 177, in: Terzetti per le Sorti : poesia oracolare nell'officina di Francesco Marcolini. edizione e commento, ed. Paolo Procaccioli, Treviso : Fondazione Benetton studi ricerche ; Roma : Viella 2006. (Ludica; 6.)

D’Onofrio, S., L’unità del pensiero empedocleo alla luce del Papiro di Strasburgo (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1665), Tesi di laurea in Storia della filosofia Antica, Trieste a. a., 1998-99.

Dorandi, Tiziano, Gli studi Ercolanesi, in: Hermann Diels (1848-1922) et la science de l’Antiquité (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, 45), Vandoeuvres-Genève 1999, p. 227-260, p. 239-242. (B 2.1, B 100.1-2, B 142.)

– Qualche considerazione di metodo, in: Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 197-203. (“we” in Pap. Strasb., B 115.3-4, B 134.)

Döring, August, Das Weltsystem des Empedokles, in: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 105, 1895, p. 29-45. (A 30, A 49, A 50, A 53, A 54, A 561, A 58, A 59 etc.)

– Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Gemeinverständlich nach den Quellen, I, Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1903,  (Emp. : p. 197-216.)

Drozdek, Adam, Empedocles’ Theology, in: Myrtia 18, 2003, p. 5-20.  (B 134.) 

http://revistas.um.es/myrtia/article/viewFile/36741/35271 http://interclassica.um.es/var/plain/storage/original/application/641f8149a020b062d41adc23f04044e3.pdf 

– Greek philosophers as theologians: the divine arche, Aldershot (UK)-Burlington (VT): Ashgate 2007. (P. 71-83, Chap. 6: Empedocles and the holy phren. Elements and forces, Harmony, Chance and necessity, God, Immortality. B 134.)

– In the beginning was the apeiron: infinity in Greek philosophy, Stuttgart: F. Steiner 2008, (Palingenesia, 94). (Chapter 7: p. 57-60. B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 39, B 98, B 112, B 135.)

– Athanasia: afterlife in Greek philosophy, Hildesheim – Zürich – New York, NY: Olms 2011. (Spudasmata, 137). (Chapter 8: Empedocles; 8.1 The soul, 8.2 Blood, 8.3 The daimôn, 8.4 The body, 8.5 Immortality, p 125-142. A 78, A 85, A 86, B 2, B 17, B 21,  B 59, B 98, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 117, B 128, [B 134], B 138, B 141, B 146, B 147.)

Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques, D’Anaximandre à Empédocle: Contacts gréco-iraniens, in: Atti del convegno sul tema: La Persia e il mondo greco-romano. Roma 11. - 14. Aprile 1965, ed. A.Pagliano, Roma: Accademia Nazionale di Lincei, 1966, p. 423-431.

Duminil, Marie-Paule, Le Sang, les vaisseaux, le cœur, dans la collection hippocratique, anatomie et physiologie, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1983. (P. 216 & 247: B 98; p. 23: B 150; p. 270-272: B 100; p. 309: B 105.)

Dümmler, Ferdinand, Akademika, Beiträge zur Litteraturgeschichte der sokratischen Schulen, Giessen: J. Ricker'sche Buchhandlung 1889. (Emp.: p. 216-235. There are two worlds and two zoogonies; the zoogony of the Strife is documented with A 30, B 62, A 85 and A 70.)

– Zur orphischen Kosmologie, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 7, 1894, p. 147-153. (Emp. and Orphismus; a critical reaction to Kern, in: AGPh 1, 1888, B 134.)

Dumont, Jean-Paul, Empédocle, in: Les Présocratiques, édition établie par Jean-Paul Dumont avec la collaboration de Daniel Delattre et de Jean-Louis Poirier, (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade) Paris: Gallimard 1988, p. 319-439, plus end notes p. 1294-1331. Reprint in Collection Folio Essais, Gallimard, 1991, under the title Les Ecoles Présocratiques, p. 127-247, plus end notes p. 792-824.

Dumoulié, Camille, Empédocle ou le pathos de l’Harmonie (au Ve siècle avant J.-C), in: Critique 49 (Nr. 553-554), 1993 (juin-juillet), p. 357-371. (Popular, antiquated and literary orientated sketch of Emp. teaching with some superficial parallels with Freud, Hölderlin, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Lacan; useless for Empedoclean studies.)

Düntzer, Heinrich, Schedae criticae, in: Archiv für Philologie und Pädagogik 5, 1837, p. 205-211. (P. 208. B 21.2, B 71.1.)

Duprat, Guillaume Léonce, Quomodo apud Aristotelem in ejus. De Anima doctrina. Empedocles et Hippocrates auctoritate contenderint cum Platone, apud A. Fontemoing, Lutetiae Parisiorum 1898.

Durić [Đjurić], Miloš N., Empedokles und Anaxagoras als Ethiker [Etička shvatanja u Empedokla i Anaksagore], in: Živa antika 6, 1956, p. 93-118.

– Empedokle i načelo koegzistencije, in: Savremenik, 10, Januar, 1964, p. 179-187.

– Istorija helenske etike, Beograd : Zavod za izdavanije udžbenika 1961 (19672, 19973), p. 146-162. (= ŽA 6, 1956, p. 93-118).

Dyer, Robert, Empedocles fr. 64 (Plut. Quaest. Nat. 21. 917 C), in: Mnemosyne 27, 1974, p. 175-176. (B 64.)

EEE

Ebbesen, Sten, Boethius as an Aristotelian scholar, in: Aristoteles. Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet, 2, Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben, Berlin / New York: De Gruyter 1987, p. 286-311. (p. 309-311: an account of Empedocles found in a scholium in MS Laur. gr. 72,15, folio 22, a 13th-century codex of Aristotle's Categories. This account is taken up in Primavesi 2008b, Janko 2010, Primavesi 2011 as 65 R, p. 460.)

Ebert, Theodor, A Presocratic Philosopher behind the ‘Phaedrus’: Empedocles, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne XI(2), 1993, p. 211-227.

Edwards, Mark J., Lucretius, Empedocles and Epicurean Polemics, in: Antike und Abendland 35, 1989, p. 104-115. (B 6, B 17, B 105, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 129.)

– A Late Use of Empedocles: The Oracle on Plotinus, in: Mnemosyne 43, 1990, p. 151-155.

– Being and Seeming: Empedocles’ Reply, in: Hermes 119/3, 1991, p. 282-293.

Egleston Robbins, Frank, The creation story in Ovid Met. I, in: Classical Philology, 8, (4), 1913, p. 401-414. (four elements, B 38, B 27. The text reads fr. 8 but it is a misprint for fr. 38, and to be precise fr. 38.4 with Titan = sun.)

Egorov (Yegorov), A. S., Empedokl i problema gretcheskogo chamanizma [= Empedocles and a problem of the Greek shamanism], in: Voprosy Filosofii., 2007, 8, p 97-105. (B 111; B 128.) See abstract (in French) on page

https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov

– K voprosou o lokalizatsii potoustoronnego mira ouEmpedokla [= The question of the location of the Other World in Empedocles], in: Opusculacathedrae linguarum antiquarum. Fasc.II. Moscou, 2009, p. 72-81. (B 115; B 118; B 121; B 128.) See abstract (in French) on page https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov

– Empedokl na Etne [Empedocles on Etna], in: Aristeas:Philologia classica et historia antiqua, II, 2010, p. 15-25. (Fr.:  B 126; B 128; В 151 DK.) See abstract (in French) on page  https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov

Einarson, Benedict, & De Lacy, Philipp, The manuscript tradition of Plutarch Moralia 548A-612B, in: Classical Philology, 46, 2, 1951, p. 93-110. (De exilio, B 115.)

Eisler, Robert, Bildopfer bei Empedokles, in: Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 13, 4, 1910, p. 625-626. (B 128.4-5.)

Eitrem, Samuel, Die vier Elemente in der Mysterienweihe, in: Symbolae osloenses 4, 1926, p. 39-59 and 5, 1927, p. 39-59. (B 115.9-12.)

Ellis, Robinson, Some suggestions on Diels’ Poetarum Philosophorum Fragmenta, in: The Classical Review 16, 5, 1902, p. 269-270. (B 3.9-11, B 17.20-1 and 25, B 64.)

Emlyn-Jones, Chris, Brief review of M. R. Wright, The extant fragments, 1981, & D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981, in: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 105, 1985, p. 183. 

Emperius, Adolf, Opuscula philologica et historica amicorum studio collecta, ed. F. G. Schneidewin, Gottingae 1847, p. 287. (B 40.)

English, Robert B., Empedoclean Psychology, in: Transactions and Proceedings of the American philological Association, 45, 1914, p. xvi.

Erhardt-Siebold, Erika von, The Anglo-Saxon Riddle 74 and Empedokles Fragment 117 in: Medium Aevum 15, 1946, p. 48-54. (B 115, B 117.)

Erler, M., Hermarch, in: Die Philosophie der Antike, Band I/1: Die hellenistische Philosophie, ed. H. Flashar, Basel: Schwabe 1994, p. 227-234.

– Empedokles (31 DK), in: B. Zimmermann (ed.), Handbuch der griechischen Literatur der Antike. Erster Band: Die Literatur der archaischen und klassischen Zeit, Munich: C. H. Beck 2011, p. 277-280.

ΕΥΑΓΓΕΛΙΔΕΣ, Μαργαρίτης, Ἱστορία τῆς θεωρίας τῆς γνώσεως, Athens 1885. Empedocles: p. 75-79.

http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/?ln=fr 

http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/1.pdf?version=1  

http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/5.pdf?version=1

Eyselein, K., Symbolgehalt antiker Kosmologien, in: Der altsprachliche Unterricht 27/5, 1984, p. 50-64.

FFF

FFF

Faggi, A[dolfo?], Empedocle d’Agrigento e l’età dell’odio, in: Marzocco 46, 1919.

Fairbanks, Arthur, On Plutarch's Quotations from the Early Greek Philosophers, in: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 28, 1897, p. 75-87.

– The First Philosophers of Greece: An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works,  London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trübner (also: New York:  Charles Scribner's sons ), 1898, p. 157-234.

http://history.hanover.edu/texts/presoc/emp.htm

– Repetitions in Empedocles, in: The Classical Review 12, 1898, p. 16-17.

Fairweather, Jane A., Fiction in the Biographies of the Ancient Writers, in: Ancient Society 5, 1974-1975, p. 231-275.

Farina, Antonio, Amore e Odio in Empedocle, Caserta 1948. 

Farnell, Lewis Richard, The Cults of the Greek states, I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896. (B 6, Hera, earth, and critics, p.181-195.) 

Farrell, Joe, Looking for Empedocles in Latin Poetry: A Skeptical Approach, in: Dictynna [http://dictynna.revues.org/1063], 11, 2014.

Fausti, Daniela, Su alcuni problemi empedoclei, in: Annali della scuola normale superiore di Pisa 10, 1980, p. 363-382. (B 111.)

Ferella, Chiara, L’ampia Natura di Empedocle, thesis, Università di Pisa, 2011, http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-11052011-145844/unrestricted/Empoedocle_ampiaNatura.pdf

– Empedocle, il giorno spietato e l'esilio dagli dei: a proposito di alcuni frammenti "demonologici", in: Origini e svolgimento del pensiero greco: studi per Jean-Pierre Vernant, ed. R. Di Donato, Pisa: ETS 2013 (Anthropoi. Studi e materiali di antropologia storica del mondo antico, 8), p. 29-47. (B 112, B 115, B 117, B 119, B. 126, B 127, B 146, B 147.)

Ferguson, John, Two Notes on the Preplatonics, in: Phronesis 9, 2, 1964, p. 98-106. (Chap. 1, Empedocles DK 31 A 30, p. 98-101; A 30, A 60, A 61, B 45.)

– ΔΙΝΟΣ, in: Phronesis 16, 1971, p. 97-115.

Ferrari, Sante, Empedocle, Roma: Tipografia delle Terme Diocleziane di Giovanni Balbi 1891. (This work is a reprinting of the following two items.)

– Empedocle, i frammenti del poema tradotti, in: La Biblioteca delle Scuole Italiana 13, 1891, p. 199-200 and 14, p. 215-220.

– Empedocle, in: Rivista Italiana di Filosofia 1/6, 1891, p. 165-190 and La Filosofia di Empedocle, in: dtto 2/6, 1891, p. 52-79 and 250-293.

– La filosofia nella magna Grecia dopo Empedocle, in: Atti e Memorie della R. Accademia di Scienze Lettere ed Arti in Padova 8/293, 1891-2, p. 113-151 (This article was published separately under the same title by Randi, Padova 1892.)

Ferwerda, Rein, Empedokles. Aarde, lucht, water en vuur. Vertaald en toegelicht door Rein Ferwerda, Amsterdam: Athenaeum – Polak & Van Gennep 1997, (Baskerville serie). 1997. Reprint in 2006 (Budel: Damon Publisher). (All Greek fragments mainly edited by DK (see differences p. 129), edited by DK, with translation and a few comments. The order and numbering of the fragments are Ferwerda’s. Translation of some Testimonia. B 6, on 4 elements of Emp., reviewed by: Beullens, P., Tijdschrift voor filosofie.70, 2,  2008, p 408).

Feshbach, Sidney, Empedocles: The Phenomenology of the Four Elements in Literature, in: Poetics of the elements in the human condition: part 2.The airy elements in poetic imagination, ed. A. T. Tymieniecka, Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer AcademicPublishers 1988, p. 9-63, (Analecta Husserliana, 23). (B 2, B 6, B 24, B 29, B 35, B 111, B 117, B 126,  B 129, B 146.)

Fialho, Maria do Céu, Review of Rossetti L & Santaniello C., Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, 2004, in: Humanitas, 57, 2005, p. 468-470.

Filée, John, The Strasbourg Collection of Empedocles, in: Études classiques 67, 1999, p. 273-274 (review of Martin - Primavesi, 1999).

Finkelberg, Aryeh, Xenophanes’ Physics, Parmenides’ Doxa and Empedocles’ Theory of Cosmogonical Mixture, in: Hermes 125.1, 1997, p. 1-16.

– On the History of the Greek ΚΟΣΜΟΣ, in: Harvard Studies in classical Philology, 98, 1998, p. 103-136. (B 26.5, B 134.)

Flashar, Hellmut, Empedokles, frgm. B 111 und seine Stellung im Lehrgedicht über die Natur, in: Actes de la XIIe conférence internationale d’études classiques, 1975, p. 547-551.

Förster, Aurel, Empedocleum, in: Hermes, 74, 1939, p. 102-104. (B 84.8.)Fortenbaugh, William W & Schütrumpf, Eckart, Dicaearchus of Messana: text, translation, and discussion, Piscataway (NJ): Transaction Publishers 2001. Reprint in Abingdon-New York: Routledge 2017, (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 10)

Fortenbaugh, William W & Schütrumpf, Eckart, Dicaearchus of Messana: text, translation, and discussion, Piscataway (NJ): Transaction Publishers 2001. Reprint in Abingdon-New York: Routledge 2017, (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 10).

Fóti, Véronique, Marion, Epochal discordance: Hölderlin’s philosophy of tragedy, Albany (NY): State University of New York Press 2006, (SUNY Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy). (Emp.: p. 29-63.)

– Empedocles’s philosophy of nature as mandating non-violence, in: Values and Justice in the Global Era, ed. Kostas Boudouris, Athens: Ionia Publications 2007, p. 91-102.

Fraisse, Jean-Claude, Philia: La notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique, essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé, J. Vrin: Paris 1974, p. 84-87. (An uninformative sketch of one of principal Emp. idea; Emp. philia was allegedly confined to be a cosmological conception and had not any anthropologic and emotional meaning but even in the cosmology Empedocles was not able to contribute essentially to the history of the term.)

François, Gilbert, Le polythéisme et l’emploi au singulier des mots θεός, δαίμων dans la littérature grecque d’Homère à Platon, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1957, (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, fasc. CXLVII). (Emp.: p. 176-177, 185, 311, 340. B 6, B 112, B 115, B 146, B 59 : Amour et Haine. Review by J. Defradas in Revue des études anciennes, 63-1-2, 1961, p. 134-137.)

Fränkel, Hermann, Homerische Wörter, in: Ἀντίδωρον· Festschrift Jacob Wackernagel [...] gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1923, p. 274-282. (B. 2.6-9, ad B 3, B 134.)

– A Thought Pattern in Heraclitus, in: American Journal of Philology, 59/3, 1938, p. 309-337. (P. 325, n. 35: B 2.2 and B 110.)

– Man’s “ephemeros” Nature according to Pindar and Others, in: Transactions and Proceedings of the American philological Association, 77, 1946, p. 131-145. (B 2.2-4, B 131.1.)

– Zur ‘Discordia’ des Ennius, in: Philologus 97 (N.S. 51), 1948, p. 354. (B 17.27; refusal of Norden’s theory on Ennius’ interpretation of Empedocles.)

Freeman, Edward Augustus, The History of Sicily from the Earliest Times I-IV, Oxford : Oxford University Press 1891 - 1894. (II, p. 342-356. B 111, B 112.)

Freeman, Kathleen, The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. A Companion to Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford: Blackwell 1946. (Second edition: Cambridge [Ma]: Harvard University Press 1959. In fact, what is called “second edition” is a reprint. In 1946 and in 1959 see Emp.: p. 172-204.)

– Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers: a complete translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1948. Reprint at Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press 199624. (P. 51-69.)

Frenkian, Aram M., Études de philosophie présocratique, II : La philosophie comparée, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Parménide d’Élée, Paris: J. Vrin 1937. (P. 46-61. B 8, B 109, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 134, B 62, B 110, B 100, B 84.)

– Theophrast De Sensu Kap. 10, in: Philologus, 107, 1963, p. 313. (A 86, par. 10.)

Frère, Jean, Le Cosmos d'Empédocle et le triomphe de la vie autour de l'usage répétitif des formules-images, in: ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ (Athènes), 30, 2000, p. 231-234.

– Trois penseurs présocratiques : Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle, in: Les Annales de l'Académie d'Alsace, 68, 2002, p. 76-86. (B 16, B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29.)

– Les dieux d'Élée et d'Agrigente, in: Agonistes - Essays in honour of Denis O'Brien, (ed.) J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 3-12. Reprint London - New York: Routledge 2017. (A 32, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 134.)

Friedlaender, Paul, Δὶς καὶ τρὶς τὸ καλόν, in: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69, 1938, p. 375-380.

Friedländer, Pablo, El lenguaje poético de Empédocles, in: Synthesis,12, 2005, p. 59-77.  http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/synth/v12/v12a05.pdf

– La épica chamánica de Empédocles,  in: Societas Philosophorum Viventium - (without date; probably around 2006) - http://www.filosofiaviva.net/textos/archivos/pdf_10_18.pdf

Fritsche, Johannes, The riddle of the Sphinx: Aristotle, Penelope, and Empedocles, in: Monsters and Philosophy, ed. Charles T. Wolfe, London: College Publications 2005, (Texts in Philosophy, 3), p. 1-19.

Fritzsche, R. A., Der Magnet und die Athmung in antiken Theorien, in: Rheinisches Museum 57, 1902, p. 363-391. (P. 368-369: Emp. theory of magnetism; p. 378-379: Emp. theory of breathing.)

Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise, Avec son diaphragme visionnaire : ᾿ΙΔΥΙΗΣΙ ΠΡΑΠΙΔΕΣΣΙ », Iliade XVIII, 481. À propos du bouclier d'Achille, in: Revue des Études Grecques, 115, 2, 2002. p. 463-484. (Useful for homeric background.)

Fuchs, Werner, Die Verseuchung des Wassers in Selinus und die Tat des Empedokles, in: Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts (Römische Abteilung) 64, 1957, p. 230-231. (A 1, par. 70).

Fuller, B.A.G., History of Greek philosophy: Thales to Democritus, New York: Henry Holt and Company 1923.

(Emp.: p. 181-201. )

Furley, David J., The Early History of the Concept of Soul, in: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 3, 1, 1956, p. 1-18. (Pages 14-15; a not very original sketch of the Empedoclean conception of soul and cognition; B 117, B 115, B 3.9-12, B 105.2.)

– Empedocles and the Clepsydra, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77, 1, 1957, p. 31-34.

– Variations on Themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’ Proem, in: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 17, 1970, p. 55-64.

– Empedocles and the invention of elements, in: D. Furley, The Greek cosmologists, Vol I, The formation of the atomic theory and its earliest critics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987 (reprinted 1988, 1989... 2006), p. 79-104 (= chap. 7). (B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 98.)

Furnari Luvarà, Giusi, Le origini siceliote della retorica e l’Empedocle di Domenico Scinà, in: Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto: Istituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia 1989, p. 185-204.

Furness, Raymond, Nietzsche and Empedocles, in: Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 2/2, 1971, p. 91-94.

GGG

Gain, Frédéric, Le statut du « daimon » chez Empédocle, in: Philosophie antique 7, 2007, p. 121-150. (B 59, B 112, B 115.)

Gagné, Renaud, L'esthétique de la peur chez Empédocle, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXIV(1), 2006, p. 83-110. (B 115.3.)

Gaisford, Thomas, Poetae minores graeci III, Leipzig : in bibliopolio Kuehniano 1823. (Emp.: p. 284-286. B 17, B 28, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 86, B 87, B 95.)

Gale, Monica Rachel., Myth and Poetry in Lucretius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. (P. 59-74, p. 219. B 3, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 128, B 130, B 131, B 151.)

– Etymological Wordplay and Poetic Succession in Lucretius, in: Classical Philology, 96, 2, 2001.

– Avia Pieridum loca: Tradition and innovation in Lucretius, in: Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt, ed. Marietta Horster - Christiane Reitz, Palingenesia Band 85, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2005, p. 175-191. (Several fragments; mainly: B128.)

Gallavotti, Carlo, Alcune frasi di Empedocle interpretate con i criteri di Aristotele, in: Rendiconti delle sedute dell' Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei [RAL], classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, 8, 28, 7-12, 1973, p. 773-792. (B 17, B 35.17, B 13-14, B 115.7.)

– Il proemio di Empedocle, in: Helicon 13-4, 1973-1974, p. 7-34. (B 4, B 131; a trial to reconstruct original filiation of fragments: B 131-B 7-B 19, B 16-B 3-B 1-B 2-B 110-B 12-B 4, B 6, B 109-B 107.)

– Il punto geometrico e l’uno di Empedocle nel trattato peripatetico della linea indivisible, in: Rendiconti dell’academia dell scienze dell’istituto di Bologna 29, 1974, p. 381-94. (The text of B 32 is δύο δεῖ; in the context of B 33 it is necessary to read ἡ δὲ στιγμὴ καὶ τὸ <ἓν> ἐν τοῖς ἀκινήτοις).

– Empedocle nei papiri ercolanesi, in: Le monde grec, hommages à Claire Préaux, ed. J. Bingen - G. Cambier - G. Nachtergael, Bruxelles: éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles 1975, p. 153-161. (B 2, A 33, B 6. The mss. of Philodemus cannot be used for an interpretation of B6. B 100, B 112, B 134, B 142.)

– Empedocle: Poema fisico e lustrale, Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori 19751. (Reprints with bibliography updated: 19914, 19935.)

– La critica di Empedocle in Diogene di Enoanda, in: Museum Criticum (Bologna) 22, 1975-1977, p. 243-249. (A 99, B 78.)

– Qualche frammento di Empedocle, in: Scritti in onore di Cleto Carbonara, Napoli 1976, p. 355-366. (B 9.5.)

– Da Stesicoro ad Empedocle, in: Kokalos 26-7, 1980-1981, p. 413-433.

– Nuovi appunti sul testo di Empedocle, in: Bollettino dei classici 6, 1985, p. 3-27. (B 2, B 6, 17.18-20, B 110, B 115 13-14, B 121, B 125, B 126, B 131.)

Gallo, Italo, Ermarco e la polemica Epicura contro Empedocle, in: Esistenza e destino nel pensiero greco arcaico, a cura di P. Cosenza, Napoli: Ed. Scientifiche Italiane 1985, p. 33-50. (A 99.)

Galsworthy, Carrie, Language and Intent in Empedocles' cosmic cycle, diss., University of Cincinnati, 2010.

Garani, Myrto, Poetry and Analogy in Empedocles and Lucretius, diss., University of London 2005.

– Cosmological oaths in Empedocles and Lucretius, in: Horkos: the oath in Greek society, ed. A.H. Sommerstein - J. Fletcher, Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press 2007, p. 189-202, and 264-267.

– Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and analogy in Lucretius, New York - Abingdon: Routledge 2007. See review by Bill Gladhill at BMCR: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-05-24.html  (A lot of fragments are mentioned in this book. The main ones are: B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 13,  B 145, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 55, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 75, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 89B 91, B 92, B 93, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 129, B 131, a(ii).) 

– The Palingenesis of Empedocles' Calliope in Lucretius, in: Essays on ancient literatures: Greece, Rome and the near East, Proceedings of the Venice International University "Advanced seminar in the humanities" 2004-2005, ed. E. Cingano - L. Milano, Padova: S.A.R.G.O.N 2008. (Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità e del Vicino Oriente / Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 4), p. 231-265.

– Lucretius and Ovid on Empedoclean Cows and Sheep, in: Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, ed. D.Lehoux - A. D. Morrison - A. Sharrock, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013, p. 233-259. (B 17, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 128 , B 136, B 137, a(ii).)

García Díaz, Adolfo, La metafísica de Empédocles, in: Diánoia 2, 1956, p. 167-180.

http://dianoia.filosoficas.unam.mx/files/2213/7021/0854/DIA56_Garcia_Diaz.pdf

Garland, Robert, The Greek way of death, London: Duckworth 1985. (Page 63: a short survey of E. Katharmoi; E. was influenced with Orphism; E. did not acknowledge any underworld and judgment after death; B 144.)

– The Eye of the Beholder. Deformity and Disability in the Graeco-Roman World, London: Duckworth, 1995, p. 174-176. (A rather traditional overview of Empedoclean „evolutionary“ zoology from untraditional teratological perspective; A 72, B 57, B 61, B 62.)

Gatz, Bodo, Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen, Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1967. (B 128, B 130.)

Gatzemeier, Matthias, Empedokles, in: Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, ed. von J. Mittelstraass, Mannheim - Wien - Zürich: Metzler 1980, I.540-541.

Gee, Emma, Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition, Oxford - New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, (Classical culture and society). (1.2 Aratus and Empedocles, p. 29-33, B 8, B 17, B 128.)

Geizie W. = Veazie, W. B. (the error in L’année philologique 1926).

Gemelli Marciano, M. Laura, Le metamorfosi della tradizione: mutamenti di significato e neologismi nel Peri physeos di Empedocle, Bari: Levante editori 1990.

– L’atomismo e il corpuscolarismo empedocleo: frammenti di interpretazioni nel mondo antico, in: Elenchos 12, 1991, p. 5-37. (A 43, A 44, A 86, A 87, A 89, A 92, B 23, B 26, B 89, B 98, B 105.)

– Der Tod des Empedokles, in: Kleos: Estemporaneo di studi e testi sulla fortuna dell’antico, a cura di F. De Martino,  Bari : Levante 1994, p. 71-74.

– Alain Martin, Oliver Primavesi: L’Empédocle de Strasbourg Empedocles (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666), in: Gnomon 72, 2000, p. 389-400.

– Le “demonologie” Empedoclee, in: Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 205-235. (Important. Apollo. Ambiguities in Emp. A 25, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 24, B 26, B 31, B 59, , B 62, B 76, B 109, B 115, B 117, B 126, B 139, a(i)6, a(i)8, a(ii)30, a(ii)17, c, d, “we” in Pap. Strasb.)

– Le Contexte culturel des Présocratiques : adversaires et destinataires, in: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed.  A. Laks & C. Louguet, Lille, Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 83-114. (Emp.: p. 106-111)

– Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 373-404. http://www.klphs.uzh.ch/aboutus/personen/gemelli/gemelli_empedokles_2005.pdf  (A 72, B 20, B 27, B 62, B 126, d 14, reincarnation, P. Derveni, and P. Kingsley' s leitmotiv: Philia binds [imprisonment of the four divine roots], Neikos releases [freedom of the four divine roots]; Pausanias must learn how to bind and release. Empedocles is a purifier, iatromantis, seerhealer.)

– Lire du début : Quelques observations sur les incipit des présocratiques, in: Philosophie antique, 7, 2007, p. 7-37. (P. 9-13: B 2.)

– Die Vorsokratiker, II, Parmenides, Zenon, Empedokles : griechisch-lateinisch-deutsch - Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen von M. L. G. M., Düsseldorf: Patmos, Artemis & Winkler 2009, (Sammlung Tusculum); 2, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2011; 3, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2013. (The difference from the previous edition resides in the updated bibliography at the end of the volume.) See:

http://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/m-l-gemelli-marciano

– Die empedokleische "Vierelementenlehre". Überlegungen über die Anfänge einer "naturwissenschaftlichen" Theorie, in: ELEMENTE – ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΑ – ELEMENTA: Antike und moderne Naturwissenschaft zum Ursprung der Dinge, Schweizerischer Altphilologenverband, Luzern, 2012, p. 25-36. (In this article, the author signes under the name Laura Gemelli.) (B 2, B 6, B 38, B 62, B 96.) 

– Feuer bei Heraklit und Empedokles: Aspekte und Funktionen einer göttlichen Kraft, in: Feuer und Wasser, Beiträge der Eranos Tagungen 2011 und 2012, ed. E. Hornung-A. Schweizer, Basel: Schwabe 2013, p. 133-157.

Gencarella,Stephen Olbrys, Purifying Rhetoric:Empedocles and the Myth of Rhetorical Theory, in: The quarterly journal of speech, 96, 3, 2010, p. 231-256. 

Gerke, Hans, Sprache und Stil des Empedokles (diss.), Götingen 1953.

Gernet, Louis, Recherches sur le développement de la pensée juridique et morale en Grèce : étude sémantique, Paris: Ernest Leroux 19171 (2nd edition, Paris: Albin Michel 2001², with new pagination). (B 115: p. 39 [p. 55], 47 [63], 312 [313], 316 [317], B 121: 242 [246], B 144: 242 [246].)

Γεωργακέλλος, Νίκος Ι, Εμπεδοκλής - υπό το πρίσμα των φυσικών επιστημών, Αθήνα, Ευρασία, 2008. 

Gheerbrant, Xavier, Qui sont les destinataires du fragment 3 d'Empédocle ? in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 78-98. 

On-line: http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/334/547. (B 3.)

– Poésie et Argumentation dans les fragments des deux poèmes d'Empédocle, Thesis for Docteur en Langue et Littérature grecques, Université de Lille 3, October 2014.  (B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17 + ensemble a, B 20 + ensemblec, B 21, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 84, B 86, B 100, B 112 (vv. 1-4), B 114, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131, fr. 509 Bollack.)

Ghidini - Tortorelli, Marisa, Instanze utopiche nel mito dell’età dell’oro. Ricerca su alcuni frammenti di Empedocle, in: Atti dell’Accademia Pontaniana 20, 1970-1971, p. 155-172 (N.S. XX, 1971, p. 1-18).

Giannantoni, Gabriele, Review of Jean Bollack, Empédocle, I Introduction à l'ancienne physique, 1965, in: Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 95, 1967, p. 331-335.

– 31. Empedocle, in: I presocratici: testimonianze e frammenti. Bari: Laterza, 1969, (Biblioteca Universale), p. 323-421. (Translation of Diels-Kranz 1951, with foot notes.)

– Empedocle: mito e realtà, in: La cultura filosofica della Magna Grecia, Messina 1989, p. 43-62.

– L’originalità del pluralismo empedocleo, in: Elenchos 18, 1997, p. 235-255. Reprint in: Giornale di Metafisica - Nuova Serie, XXI, 1999, p. 31-50. (Empedoclea Selinunte, Empedocle: religione e filosofia, L’originalità di Empedocle, Empedoclee la filosofia dell’eleatismo, B 2, B 3, B 111, B 112.)

– L’interpretazione aristotelica di Empedocle, in: Elenchos 19/2, 1998, p. 361-411. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.)

Giardina, G.R., Empedocle e gli Empedoclei sui condotti vuoti, p. 142-144, in: La chimica fisica di Aristotele : teoria degli elementi e delle loro proprietà, analisi critica del De generatione et corruptione, Roma: Aracne 2008. (Scienze storiche, filosofiche, pedagogiche e psicologiche, 285.)

Gigandet, Alain, Plutarque contre Colotès contre Empédocle, in: Aitia 3, 2013 [on-line:  http://aitia.revues.org/636 ], p. 2-10. (A 34, A 44, A 48, B 8, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 19, B 21, B 35.)

Gigante, Marcello, Attendendo Empedocle. Un’insidia al recupero del testo autentico, in: Studi Italiani di filologia classica 15, 1997, p. 131-134 (Pap. Strasb. aII.26 and 30, c 1-2 = B 20, B 2.1, B 100.1-2).

Gigon, Olof, Zum antiken Begriff der Harmonie, in: Studium Generale 19, 1966, p. 539-547.

Gilbert, Otto, Die Meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1907. (Chap. V: Empedokles, p. 105-124; B 6, B 21.)

– Spekulation und Volksglaube in der ionischen Philosophie, in: Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 13, 1910, p. 306-332. 

– Griechische Religionsphilosophie, Leipzig: W. Engelmann 1911, p. 197-225. (P. 200-202: B 6; p. 204: B 17, B 35; p. 205: B 115; p. 206: B 17, B 26 ; p. 207-208: Sphairos; p. 211, 215: B 35; p. 221: B 135; p. 222: B 133, B 134.)

Gill, Christopher, The person and the human mind: issues in ancient and modern philosophy, ed. by Christopher Gill, Oxford-New York: Clarendon Press 1990.

(P. 205: daimôn as occult self. B 115.)

– La psychologie présocratique: quelques questions interprétatives, in: Les anciens savants: études sur les philosophies préplatoniciennes réunies par Pierre-Marie Morel et Jean-François Pradeau, (Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, Tome 12), Université Marc Bloch, Strasbourg 2001, p. 169-189.

Giombini Stefania, review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, de Rossetti L., e C. Santaniello, in: Nova Tellus 28.2, 2010.

http://redalyc.org.www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59120919014

Giordani, Pietro, Review of Scinà, Memorie (1813), in: Biblioteca Italiana 1, 1816, p. 322-33, 2, p. 15-21, 4, p. 247-259 = P. Giordani, Opere, a cura di A. Gussalli, Milano 1857, X.14-37. (P. 25-7: B 100.)

Gkarani, Myrto, see Garani, Myrto.

Gladigow, Burkhard, Zum Makarismos des Weisen, in: Hermes 95, 1967, p. 404-433. (B 110, B 115, B 129, B 132.)

Gladisch, August, Empedokles und die alten Aegypter, in: Jahrbücher für speculative Philosophie und die philosophische Bearbeitung der empirischen Wissenschaften 2/4, 1847, p. 681-725 and 5/2, p. 903-944. (This is repeated more fully in 1858.)

– Empedokles und die Aegypter. Eine historische Untersuchung von A. G., mit Erläuterungen aus den Aegyptischen Denkmälern von Dr. Heinrich Brugsch und Joseph Passalacqua, Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs 1858 (very fantastic and improbable identification of Empedoclean teaching with Egyptian beliefs; some textual suggestions).

– Das mystische vierspeichige Rad bei den alten Aegyptern und Hellenen, in: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 15/2, 1861, p. 406-409.

Goebel, Karl, Empedokles, in: Die vorsokratische Philosophie, Bonn: Carl Georgi 1910, p. 191-226.

Golosovker, J., Empedokl iz Agrigenta, in: Gelděrlin, F., Smerť Empedokla, Moskva - Leningrad 1931.

Gomperz, Theodor, Griechische Denker. Eine Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, I, Leipzig: Veit & Comp. 1896. 1903². 19113, 19224. (Emp.: p. 183-204. Engl. transl. Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy, Bristol 1996 (19051), I.227-254. French translation by A. Reymond in Théodore Gomperz. Les penseurs de la Grèce: histoire de la philosophie antique, I, Paris: F. Alcan 1908, Lausanne: Payot 1908. )

– Herculanische Notizen, in: Wiener Studien 2, 1880, p. 139-42, p. 140. (B 100.1-2.)

– Zu Empedokles, in: Hermes 31, 1896, p. 469-471.

– Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung griechischer Schriftsteller, in: Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 152, 1906, p. 1-31, p. 14-15. (The author attempts to identify the supposed Empedoclean fragment.)

González Escudero, Santiago, Raíces y elementos en Empédocles, in: El Basilisco, 1st collection, 13, 1981-1982, p. 62-69.

http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/bas11306.htm ,

 http://www.filosofia.org/ave/001/a297.htm , 

http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/pdf/bas11306.pdf . (B 6.)

Goto (後藤), Jun (淳), エンペドクレス哲学において思惟性と生命性を担うフレーン [Φρήν carrying the thoughtfulness and vitality in Empedocles' philosophy], in: 東亜大学紀要, no.12, 2010, p. 25-39. This article can be read on the web with an abstract in English. Link found with the address of the author: jung510@toua-u.ac.jp. (B 134.)

Goulet, Richard, s. v. Empédocle, in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Tome III, ed. R. Goulet, Paris: C.N.R.S.-Éditions 2000, p. 66-88 (exceptp. 67-70 for ‘Papyrus de Strasbourg’ by A. Martin).

Goytisolo, Juan, Las chinelas de Empédocles, in: Obras completas, I. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg : Círculo de Lectores. 2005, (Opera mundi),  pp 354-391,.

Grabowski, Franz, Empedokles und Leukipp-Demokrit, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Anaxagoras (diss.), Breslau: Hochschulverlag 1923.

Graf, Fritz, Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenistischer Zeit, Berlin - New York 1974.

Graham, Daniel Watkins, Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle, in: The Classical Quarterly, 38, 2, 1988, p. 297-312.

– Empedocles and Anaxagoras: Responses to Parmenides, in: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 159-180.

– La lumière de la lune dans la pensée grecque archaïque, in: Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique?, ed. A. Laks - C. Louguet, Lille, 2002, p. 351-380.

– The topology and dynamics of Empedocles’ cycle, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 225-244.

– Explaining the cosmos: the Ionian tradition of scientific philosophy, Princeton - Oxford: Princeton University Press 2006. (B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, , B 36, B 62, B 96, B 98.)

– The texts of early Greek philosophy: the complete fragments and selected testimonies of the major Presocratics, Part I, Cambridge: University Press 2010. (Emp.: p. 326 - 433.)

Grammatico, Giuseppina, L'immaginario empedocleo, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, p. 48-70.

Grandolini, Simonetta & Maria Cannatà Fera (ed.), Poesia e religione in Grecia. Studi in onore di G. Aurelio Privitera. Vol. 1 and 2, Naples: Ed. Scientifiche Italiane 2000, (Pubblicazioni dell’Università degli Studi di Perugia).

Green, Christopher, D. & Philip, R. Groff, Early psychological thought: ancient accounts of mind and soul, Westport (CT)-London: Praeger 2003. (Emp.: p. 31-34.)

Gregory, Andrew, Empedocles, in: Ancient Greek Cosmogony, London: Bloomsbury 2007, p. 78-101. (Chap. 5. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. Interesting focus on chance in cosmogony and zoogony. “The kosmoi generated by the cycle are not identical, and the differences are down to chance”. B 8, B 12, B 13, B 14, 17, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 62, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 103, B 104, B 124, a(i) 6, a(ii) 17.)

– Empedocles, in: The Presocratics and the Supernatural: Magic, Philosophy and Science in Early Greece, London: Bloomsbury 2013. p. 167-184. (Ch. 9. Empedocles’ ontology, meteorology, cosmogony, zoogony. Love and Strife. Empedocles’ gods. Empedocles’ magic? Empedocles as a shaman? Empedocles’ claims. Metempsychosis. Empedocles and Homer. It is possible to have a view of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle where there are only natural entities and processes. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. B 111. B 112.)

Grmek, Mirko D., La légende et la réalité de la nocivité des fèves, in: History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences,  2, 1, 1980, p. 61-121. (B 140.)

Grilli, Alberto, Lucrezio tra poesia e filosofia, in: Annali del liceo G. Garibaldi di Palermo 14-16, 1977-1979, p. 197-216. (Lucretius was inspired mainly by Homer, Hesiod, Emp. and Ennius.)

Grimal, Edmonde, A propos d’un passage du Ménon, une définition “tragique” de la couleur, in: Revue des études grecques 55, 1942, p. 1-13. (A 921.)

Grottanelli, Cristiano., Healers and Saviours of the Eastern Mediterranean in Pre-Classical Times, in: La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell’Impero Romano, a cura di U. Bianchi - M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden 1982, p. 649-670.

Grünwald, Michael, Die Anfänge der abendländischen Philosophie. Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Mit einer Einführung von M. Laura Gemelli Marciano, Zürich-Münich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Artemis Verlag 1991, (Bibliothek der Antike). (Emp.: 121-144. An extensive translation of B fragments and A testimonies; and p. 225-230: notices. Does not follow Diels’s ordering of the fragments. First edition in Zürich: Artemis 1949.)

Gruppe, Otto, Griechische Mythologie und Religionsgeschichte, Band I-II, Munich 1903-1906. (I.429 [B 6] and II.1044 [Empedocles as a magician].)

Guglielmino, F[rancesco?], Empedocle, in: Tradizione 1939.

Guthrie, William Keith Chambers, Orpheus and Greek religion: a study of the orphic movement, London: Methuen & Company 1935. Reprint with foreword in 1952². Reprint in Princeton (N.J): Princeton University Press 1993. French translation by S.M. Guillemin of the second edition of 1952 in Paris: Guthrie W.K.C., Orphée et la religion grecque, Payot 1956. (P. 169: B 115, B 146-147. P.175: B 112, B 117. P.197: B 128, B 136, B 137. P. 231-232.)

– The presocratic world-picture, in: The Harvard Theological Review, 45, 2, 1952, p. 87-104. (Empedocles: p. 93, 98-102, some remarks on Empedocles´theory of soul, daimones, cosmos.) 

http://www.upf.edu/materials/fhuma/hiid1/mat/txt/guthrie.pdf

 – The Greeks and their Gods, Boston: Beacon Press 1954 (First edition : 1950). (P. 309-325 : Orphism and Empedocles.)

 –  In the Beginning: Some Greek views on the origins of life and the early state of man, London: Methuen & Co 1957. Also: Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1957, (The Messenger lectures, 1957). (P. 42-45, 72-73 ; B 61, B 62; B 128.)

–  A History of Greek Philosophy, II, The presocratic tradition from Parmenides to Democritus, Cambridge - London - New York: Cambridge University Press 1965, p. 122-265.

Guzzo, Augusto, Empedocle d’Agrigento, in: Atti dell' Accademia di scienze, lettere e arti di Palermo, IV, 23, 2, 1962-1963, p. 121-180. Also as an extract with same title and pagination, Palermo, Presso l’Accademia 1964. (B 2-3, B 6, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 27-31, B 35, B 38, B 40-42, B 44-45, B 47, B 54, B 57, B 67, B 71-73, B 77-78, B 79, B 82-83, B 84, B 85-89, B 96, B 100, B 102-103, B 105-107, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 117, B 120-123, B 128, B 129, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 138, B 139, B 144, B 146, B 147.)

HHH

HHH

Habermehl, P[eter?], Empedokles, in: Metzler Philosophen Lexicon, ed. von B. Luty, Stuttgart: Metzler 1989, p. 217-219. 

Hadot, Pierre, Qu'est-ce que la philosophie antique ?, Paris: Gallimard 1995. (P. 276-277: B 129; p. 278: B 132.) 

Hagen, Hermann, In Vergilii Bucolica, Seruui Grammatici in Vergilii Carmina, Leipzig 1902.

Hahm, David E., The Origins of Stoic Cosmology, Colombus: Ohio State University Press, 1977. (B 6, B 8, B 17, B 38, B 62, B 73.)

Halbertsma, Klaas Tjalling Agnus, Over den wijsgeer Empedokles, in: Hermeneus 21, 1949, p. 3-9, 22-26 and 62-68.

Halbwachs, Maurice, La représentation de l´âme chez les Grecs: le double corporel et le double spirituel, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 37/4, 1930, p. 493-534. (Emp. p. 518-519.)

Hall, Alexander, E. W., Dating the Homeric Hymn to Selene: Evidence and Implications, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 53, 2013, p. 15-30. (Moon, B 45.) 

Halleux, Robert, Le problème des métaux dans la science antique, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1974, (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, fasc. 209), Presses universitaires de Liège & OpenEdition Books 2013. (Chapitre I. Les présocratiques : http://books.openedition.org/pulg/967 A 34, A 89, B 91, B 92.)

Hallier, Aemilius [Emil], Lucreti carmina e fragmentis Empedoclis adumbrata (diss.), Ienae: Typis Maukii 1857 (39 p.). 

Ham, Charles Tyler, Empedoclean elegy: love, strife and the four elements in Ovid’s amores, ars amatoria and fasti, Thesis in classical studies, University of Pennsylvania, 2013. 

Hamblenne, P., Au Salluste inconnu, in: Revue Belge de philologie et d’histoire 59, 1981, p. 60-70 (A 20).

Hanf, Roland, Begriffliches Denken bei Empedokles [diss., Kiel?] 2000.

Hankinson, R. J., Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998, p. 45-49. (Empedocles: structure and emergence; B 12, B 15, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 98.)

Hardie, Alex, Empedocles and the Muse of the agathos logos, in: American Journal of Philology, 134, nb 2, 2013, p. 209-246. (B 3, B 4, Β 23, B 110, B 131, B 133, B 134.)

– The formation of an Augustan elegist: Empedocles and Propertius’ ‘Monobiblos’, in: Word and context in Latin poetry. Studies in memory of David West, ed. A. J. Woodman & J. Wisse, Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society 2017, p. 61-87. (A 98, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 20, B 30, B 98, B 101, B 115, B 122, B 124, B 134.)

Hardie, Philip Russel, The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos, in: The Classical Quarterly 45, 1995, p. 204-214.

– The Ars poetica and the poetics of didactic, in:  Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, 72 (New Approaches to Horace’s Ars poetica), 2014, p. 43-54.

Harris, William Vernon.,  Dreams and Experience in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge (Mass.) - London: Harvard University Press, 2009, p. 237-240. (Empedocles and his theory of dreams, ad B 108.)

Harrison, Jane Ellen, The Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion, Cambridge 1908.

Haussleiter, Johannes, Der Vegetarismus in der Antike, Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann 1935. (P. 157-163 et passim. The passage on Empedocles is strongly dependent on Diels’ translations of fragments and Wilamowitz’s commentaries in SPAW 1929 and it is not very informative).

Heath, Thomas L., Aristarchus of Samos: the ancient Copernicus. A history of Greek astronomy to Aristarchus together with Aristarchus's treatise [...], Oxford: Clarendon Press 1913. (Empedocles:  p. 86-93, reprint in Greek in 2005 below.)

– Αρίσταρχος ο Σάμιος, ο αρχαίος Κοπέρνικος, μτφρ. Θ. Γραμμένος, Αθήνα: Κέντρο Έρευνας Επιστήμης και Εκπαίδευσης [«Κ.Ε.ΕΠ.ΕΚ.»], 2005. P. 82-89 (« Εμπεδοκλής »).

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie [i. e. Hegel’s lectures from 1805 to 1830], in: Hegel’s Werke, ed. von K. L. Michelet et alii, Bände XIII-XV, Berlin 1833-1837, Band XIII, 1833, p. 269-275.

Heidel, William Arthur, Qualitative Change in Pre-Socratic Philosophy, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 19, 1906, p. 353-379.

– On certain Fragments of the Pre-Socratics, in: Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences 48, 1913, p. 725-729. (B 109, B 110, B 101.)

– Περι φύσεως: A Study of the Conception of Nature among the Pre-Socratics, in: Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences 45, 1910, p. 79-133. 

Heinimann, Felix, Nomos und Physis. Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im Griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, Basel: Verlag Friedrich Reinhardt AG, 1945, p. 48-9, 84-5, 89-90, 153 (B 9), 89-90, 153 (B 8), 85 (B 17.22: νομίζεσθαι), 91-2 (B 63.)

Heinze, Richard, Xenokrates: Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente, Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1892.(Emp.: p.86-87. B 21.12 or B 23.8, B 115.)

Helmbold, W. C. & O’Neil, E. N., Plutarch’s quotations, Baltimore: The American Philological Association 1959, (Philological Monographs, 19).

Herrero de Jáuregui, Miguel, Salvation for the Wanderer: Odysseus, the Gold Leaves, and Empedocles, in: Philosophy and Salvation in Greek Religion, ed. V. Adluri, Berlin - Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013 (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 60), p. 29-57. (B 3, B 20, B 23, B 84, B 112, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.)

Hershbell, Jackson P., Empedocles’ oral Style, in: Classical Journal 63, 1968, p. 352-357.

– Hesiod and Empedocles, in: Classical Journal 65, 1970, p. 145-161.

– Plutarch as a Source for Empedocles Re-examined, in: The American Journal of Philology, 92, 2, 1971, p. 156-184. (B 5, B 8, B 24, B 25, B 27, B 76, B 115, B 122.)

– Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a source for Empedocles re-examined, in: Phronesis 18.2, p. 97-114, and 18.3, p. 187-203, 1973. (B 6, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 131.)

– The Idea of Strife in Early Greek Thought, in: The Personalist 55, 1974, p. 205-215.

– Empedoclean Influences on the Timaeus, in: Phoenix 28, 2, 1974, p. 145-166.

Hild, Joseph-Antoine,  Étude sur les démons dans la littérature et la religion des Grecs, Paris: Hachette 1881. (Empedocles : p. 228-234.)

– Daemon, in: Dictionnaire des Antiquités Grecques et Romaines,Tome deuxième, Première partie, ed. Ch. Daremberg & Edm. Saglio, avec le concours de Edm. Pottier, Paris: Hachette1892, p. 9-19. (P. 15: “chez Empédocle tout ce qui touche la divinité […] reçoit le nom de démon”. Footnote: Pseud. Orig. Phil. I, 3 ; Plut. Tranq. an. 474 ; Porph. Antr. Nymph. 8. ”. B 115.)

Hirzel, Rudolf, Über Rundzahlen, in: Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-Historische Classe, 37, Leipzig: S. Hirzel 1885, p. 1-74. (Emp.:  30 000 seasons, p. 64-72. B 115.)

Hladký, Vojtěch, Vítkův Empedoklés, in: Souvislosti 3–4, 53-54, 2002, p. 194-202. (A review of Tomáš Vítek's Empedocles, I.)

http://www.souvislosti.cz/3402/hla.html 

– Empedokleův Sfairos, in: Filosofický časopis 3/54, 2006, p. 393-410. (In Czech, English summary.)

– Empedokleův Sfairos očima antických interpretů, in: Listy filologické (Folia philologica), 2008, 131, 1, p. 379-439. (Language: CZECH. See an English abstract: http://lf.clavmon.cz/  . A recent English translation of the whole text by Anna Pilátová can be supplied by Vojtěch Hladký on demand - vojtechhladky@gmail.com - or by empedocles.acragas.)

– Reinkarnující se duše mezi Presokratiky a Platónem, in: Reflexe 38, 2010, p. 19-34. (Empedocles : p. 22-24.)

– Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, I: Aristotle and the neoplatonists, in: Eirene, 50, 1-2, 2014, p. 149-164.

– Empedocles' Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, II: Plato's Timaeus and Statesman, in: Eirene, 51, 2015, p. 71-98.

Hladký, Vojtěch et alii, Evoluce před Darwinem [Evolution before Darwin], Praha: Pavel Mervart, 2012. (P. 71-86. Chap. Empedocles: The cycle of life; a partly popular, partly original interpretation of E. zoology in the context of his cosmology; the text is written in Czech.) 

Hoessly, Fortunat, 2.4. Empedokles, in: Katharsis: Reinigung als Heilverfahren, Studien zum Ritual der archaischen und klassischen Zeit sowie zum Corpus Hippocraticum, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2001, (Hypomnemata,135), p. 188-197.  (B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 129, B 136, B 137, B 146.)

Höfer, Ferdinand, Zur Lehre von der sinnlichen Wahrnehmung im 4. Buche des Lukrez, in: Zu der öffentlichen Prüfung des Gymnasiums zu Seehausen in der Altmark und zur Vorfeier des Geburtsfestes Sr. Majestät des Kaisers und Königs und zur Entlassung der Abiturienten am 20. und 21. März 1872 zu ergebenst einladen Dir. Aug. Dihle, Stendal 1872, p. 1-24. [B 84.] 

Hoffmann-Loß, Herbert, Die Wiedergabe der Empedokleischen Physik durch Aristoteles (diss.), Göttingen 1966. (B 6, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 35, B 36, B 37, B 39, B 59, B 62, B 96, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 133, B 134, B 135.)

Hollenberg, Wilhelm, Empedoclea, in: Jahresbericht über das Königliche Joachimsthalsche Gymnasium, Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1853, p. 1-31 (De prooemio Empedoclis: p. 1-17, De cognoscendi facultate: p. 17-31).

Hölscher, Uvo, Weltzeiten und Lebenzyklus: eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie, in: Hermes 93, 1965, p. 7-33 (= reprinted in U. Hölscher, Anfängliches Fragen: Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen: 1968, p. 173-212).

– Empedokles und Hölderlin, Frankfurt am Main: Insel 1965 (the second actualized edition was published like Schriften der Hölderlin-Gesellschaft 21, Eggingen: Isele 1998).

– Anfängliches Fragen. Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck& Ruprecht 1968. (Emp.: p.173-212. B 6, B 8, B 12, B 17, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 35, B 110, B 123.)

– Der Sinn von Sein in der älteren griechischen Philosophie, in: Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften 3/1976, Heidelberg 1976.

– Heraklit über göttliche undmenschliche Weisheit, in: Aleida Assmann (ed.),Weisheit. Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation III, Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag 1991, p. 73-80, p. 77-78 (concise notices on B 3.3, B 2.9, B 113, B112.4-5).

Holwerda, Douwe, Commentatio de vocis quae est φύσις vi atque usu praesertim in Graecitate Aristotele anteriore, Groningen 1955.

–Zu Empedokles fr. 20 D-K, in: Mnemosyne 4/50, 1997, p. 320-321. (B 20.)

Hommel, Hildebrecht, Cetera mitte, zu Archilochus, Horaz, Euripides und Empedokles, in: Gymnasium 58, 1951, p. 218-227.

Hooykaas, Reijer, Het begrip element in zijn historisch-wijsgerige ontwikkeling, Diss. Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1933.

Horna,  Constantinus, Empedocleum, in: Wiener Studien 48, 1930, p. 3-11. (B 134, B 29, A 1, par. 77, A 2, B 160.)

Huffman, Carl A., The Pythagorean Tradition, in: A. A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge 1999, p. 66-87, p. 75-78. (Emp. as a Pythagorean; B 137, B 115, B 112.)

– Aristoxenus’ Pythagorean Precepts: A Rational Pythagorean Ethic, in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa: Edizione della Normale 2006, p. 103-121, p. 108, n. 4 (A 95).

Hüffmeier, Friedrich, Phronesis in den Schriften des Corpus Hippocraticum, in: Hermes, 89, 1, 1961, p. 51-84. Part II: Phronesis in der Schrift „De flatibus“, p. 65-68 (A 78, A 85, A 86.11, B 105, B 108, B 110); Part III: Phronesis in der Schrift „De Victu“, p. 71-74. (B 100: the author of De victu supposes the breathing by means of skin as just Empedocles did.)

Hunger, Herbert, Palimpsest-Fragmente aus Herodians Καθολικὴ προσῳδία, in: Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinischen Gesellschaft 16, 1967, p. 1-33. (B 153b.)

Hussey, Edward, The Presocratics, London: Duckworth 1972. Reprint: Bristol Classical Press 2010.

– Parmenides on thinking, in: Common to body and soul: philosophical approaches to explaining living behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. R. A. H. King, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2006, p. 13-30. (Emp.: p. 26-27. A general hypothesis about the earlier "like by like”, an "inner model theory" of the mind. B 109.)

Hyland, Drew A., The origins of philosophy: its rise in myth and the Pre-socratics, A collection of early writings selected, edited, and with explanatory essays, New York: Capricorn Books 1973. (Emp.: p.  237-265.)

III

Ierodiakonou, Katerina, Empedocles and the ancient painters, in: Colour in the ancient mediterranean world, (eds) Liza Cleland, Karen Stears, Glanys Davies, Oxford: John and Erica Hedges, 2004, (Bar British Archaeological Report, International series, 1267), p. 91-95. (Reprint in 2016 by Bar Publishing in Oxford. Skiagraphia. A 86, A 92, B 21, B 23, B 71, B 96, B 107.)

– Empedocles on colour and colour vision, in: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, 2005, p. 1-37 (http://www.oup.co.uk/pdf/0-19-928744-9.pdf).

(A 37, A 43, A 57, A 70, A 72, A 78, A 86, A 90, A 91, A 92, B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 33, B 34, B 35, B 50, B 61, B 67, B 71, B 84, B 91, B 93, B 94, B 96, B 98, B 107, 109.)

– Basic and mixed colors in Empedocles and Plato, in: L'Antiquité en couleurs : Catégories, Pratiques, Représentations, Textes réunis par Marcello Carastro, Grenoble: Jerôme Millon 2009. 

Imbraguglia, Giorgio et alii (ed.), Index Empedocleus. 1 & 2, Genova: Erga 1991, (Le opere e i giorni).

– La situazione del discorso di Empedocle, in: Index Empedocleus. Le opere e i giorni I-II, ed. G. Imbraguglia et alii, Genova: Erga 1991, p. 11-35.

Immisch, Otto, Sprachliches zum Seelenschmetterling, in: Glotta 6, 1915, p. 193-206. (Pages 197-202: a contribution to genesis of the idea of body as an envelope of soul; ad B 126).

Indelli, Giovanni, Filodemo ed Empedocle, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 277-288.

Inwood, Brad, Review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981, in: Ancient Philosophy, 4, 1, 1984, p. 99-101. 

– The Poem of Empedocles. A text and translation with an introduction, Toronto - Buffalo - London: University of Toronto Press 1992, (Phoenix Presocratics, III). Revised edition, Toronto - Buffalo - London: University of Toronto Press 2001.

– Empedocles, in: The Oxford Classical Dictionary, third edition, ed. S. Hornblower & A. Spawforth, Oxford: Oxford University Press 19963, p. 523. 

– Empedocles,  in: Encyclopedia of classical philosophy, ed. D. J. Zeyl, D. T. Devereux & P. T. Mitsis, Westport (Conn.): Greenwood Press, London-Chicago (Ill.): Fitzroy Deaborn 1997, p. 203-206. 

– Empedocles fragments, in: The Times Literary Supplement, Jul. 9, 1999, p. 17. (Pap. Strasb.)

– Empedocles, in: Encyclopedia of Classical Philosophy, ed. D. J. Zeyl, D. T. Devereux & P. T. Mitsis, Westport (Conn.): Greenwood Press - London - Chicago (Ill.): Fitzroy Deaborn 1997, p. 203-206.

– Review of A. Martin - O. Primavesi, Empedocles - A. Martin, O. Primavesi : L'Empédocle de Strasbourg [...] 1998, in: The Classical Review 50.1, 2000, p. 5-7.

– Who do we think we are?, in: The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, ed. Burkhard Reis, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2006. (P. 230-243. B 112, B 115, B 129.)

– Empedocles and metempsychôsis: The critique of Diogenes of Oenoanda, p. 71-86, in: Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Dorothea Frede - Burkhard Reis, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2009.

Irby-Massie, Georgia L., Prometheus Bound and contemporary trends in Greek natural philosophy, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 48, 2008, p. 137-157. (B6.)  http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/911/991

Iribarren, Leopoldo, Rationalisations de la croyance : La construction de la pistis comme philosophème chez Parménide et Empédocle, in: Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXIV(1), 2006, p. 63-82.

– Les peintres d‘Empédocle (DK 31 B23) : enjeux et portée d'une analogie préplatonicienne, in: Philosophie antique, 13, 2013, p. 83-115. (B 23.)

JJJ

Jackson, Henry, On Empedocles apud Sextum Empiricum Adv. Math. VII.123, in: Proceedings of the Cambridge philological Society, 61, 1902, p. 4-5. (B2, B3.)

– On Empedocles, fragment 17, in: Proceedings of the Cambridge philological Society, 76, 1907, p. 6. (B 17.)

Jacobson, Howard, Lucretius’ Hunting Souls (3, 726-728), in: Museum Helveticum 56, 1999, p. 33. (B 58.)

– Empedocles’ Cain, in: Museum Helveticum 59, 2002, p. 12 (on parallelism between B 115 and Gen. 4.3-15).

Jacquemard, Simonne, Trois mystiques grecs : Orphée, Pythagore, Empédocle, Paris: Albin Michel 1997.

Jaeckel, Johannes Friedrich, De poetarum Siculorum hexametro (diss.), Leipzig 1902. (An important comparative analysis of verses Emp. and the other poets; B 100.3, B 29.3; useful statistics.)

Jaeger, Werner, Das Pneuma im Lykeion, in: Hermes 48, 1913, p. 29-74, p. 53-4. (A 74.)

– Diokles von Karystos. Die griechische Medizin und die Schule des Aristoteles, Berlin:  W. de Gruyter & Company 1938. (A 34, A 742.)

– The theology of the early Greek philosophers. The Gifford lectures 1936, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1947. (Emp.: p. 128-154. In German: Die Theologie der frühen griechischen Denker, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer 1953. French translation (from German), W. Jaeger. À la naissance de la théologie : essai sur les Présocratiques, Paris: Les éditions du Cerf 1966.)

– The Greek Ideas of Immortality, in: Harvard Theological Review, 52, 3, 1959, p. 135-147. (Pages 141-142: Empedoclean conception of soul - very traditionaly meant - in the contemporary context; B 117, B 119.)

Jakubanis, Geirich, Empedokl. Filosof, vrač i čarodej, dannyja dlja ego ponimanija i ocenki [Empedocles philosopher, doctor and wonder/worker, evidence for his interpretation and evaluation], in: Kijevskija universitetskaja izvestija 7 (ijul), 1905, p. 1-136 (reprinted in Kiev 1906 and in Moscow 19832; republished again under title Lukrecij, O prirode veščej II: Stati, kommentariji, fragmenty Epikura i Empedokla, ed. F. A. Petrovskij, Moskva 1947, p. 663-95; cf. also Empédocle, fragments des poèmes De la nature et Purifications [partly translated, revisioned and commented by M. L. Gasparov], in: Lucrèce 1983, p. 275-291 and 372-376. (Very general study and the translation of fragments according to Mullach’s edition.)

Janko, Richard, Hesychius Θ 216 and Empedocles Fragment 21.6, in: Classical Philology 81, 1986, p. 308-309. (B 21.6.)

– Empedocles, On Nature I 233-364: a New Reconstruction of P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1165-6, in: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 150, 2004, p. 1-26.

– Empedocles’ Physica Book 1: A New Reconstruction, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 93-135.

– Review of Empedokles Physika I. Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. By Oliver Primavesi. Berlin: De Gruyter 2008, in: Ancient Philosophy, volume 30, 2, Fall 2010, p. 407-411.

Jannaccone, Sylvia, Una reminiscenza dei Καθαρμοί nel carme 64 di Catullo, in: Giornale italiano di filologia 18, 1965, p. 127-130. (B 115.10.)

Janssen, Tjitte H., Νημερτής τ᾿ ἐρόεσσα μελάγκουρός τ᾿ ᾿Ασάφεια, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 104, 1987, p. 177-178. (B 122.4.)

Jiráni, Otakar, Sallustiova báseň Empedoclea [Sallust’s Poem on Empedocles], in: Listy filologické / Folia philologica, 31, 1, 1904, p. 14-21. (A 27.)

Jobst, Franz Xaver, Über das Verhältnis zwischen Lukretius und Empedokles, (diss.), Munich: Max Steinebach 1907.

https://archive.org/details/berdasverhltnis00jobsgoog

Joël, Karl, Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, I, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr 1921. (Emp.: p. 488-565).

Johnstone, Henry W., Empedocles’ Περὶ Φύσεως and Καθαρμοί (Bryn Mawr Greek Commentaries), Bryn Mawr (Pennsylvania) : Bryn Mawr College 1985.

Jones, Howard, Lucretius and Nature’s Monsters, in: Helmantica 44, 1993, p. 199-203. (Marginally on B 61.)

Jouanna, Jacques, Présence d’Empédocle dans la Collection Hippocratique, in: Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé 20, 1961, p. 452-463.

– La théorie de l’intelligence et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique ‘Du régime’: Ses rapports avec Empédocle et le ‘Timée’ de Platon, in: Revue des études grecques 79, 1966, p. xv-xviii.

– L'interprétation des rêves et la théoriemicro-macrocosmique dans le traité hippocratique Du régime: sémiotique et mimesis, in: Klaus-DietrichFischer – Diethard Nickel – Paul Potter (eds.), Text and Tradition. Studies in Ancient Medicine and its Transmission Presented to JuttaKollesch, Leiden: Brill 1998, p.161-174, p. 172-173. (DK 31 B 100: ad Hüffmeier and the Hippocratics.)

– La théorie de la sensation, de la pensée et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique du Régime: ses rapports avec Empédocle et le Timée de Platon, in: AION (Annali dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 29, 2007, p. 9–39.

– The Theory of Sensation, Thought and the Soul in the Hippocratic Treatise Regimen: Its Connections with Empedocles and Plato’s Timaeus, in: J. Jouanna, Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen. Selected Papers, translated by N. Allies, Leiden - Boston: Brill 2012, p. 195-228. (B 105.)

Jourdan, Fabienne, Manger Dionysos. L'interprétation du mythe du démembrement par Plutarque a-t-elle été lue par les néo-Platoniciens ?, in: Pallas, 67, 2005, p. 153-174. (B 115, De esu 996 b-c.)

Journée, Gérard, "Rien ne saurait naître de rien" - L'émergence du problème de l'être dans la philosophie pré-platonicienne, Thèse de Doctorat de l'Université Lille IIII, janvier 2007, p. 468-520. 

http://documents.univ-lille3.fr/files/pub/www/recherche/theses/JOURNEE_Gerard.pdf . (B 8, B 11, B 12, B 15.)

– Empédocle, B6 DK : Remarques sur les deux lignées de Diels, in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 32-62. Online : http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/41/544 . (B 6.)

Judet de La Combe, Pierre, Abstraction et récit dans le poème thébain de Stésichore, in: Poésie et lyrique antiques, ed. L. Dubois, Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 1996, p. 11-27.  (La réplique de Jocaste. Philotès, Neîkos.)

– L’Agamemnon d’Eschyle: Commentaire des dialogues, II, Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 2001, (Cahiers de philologie, 18). (Emp.: p. 555-558, in “Quatrième épisode. Scène de Cassandre (v. 1035-1330)” Comment on v. 1282, “L’Orestie et les Catharmes d’Empédocle”. B 105, B 112.6, B 115.3 and 13, B 137; on mutual influence Emp. and Aesch.)

Jurado López, Manuel, No es mal momento para recordar a Empédocles, p. 33-35, in: Los dioses vulnerables. Sevilla: Algaida 2008. (Algaida poesía; 60.)

KKK

Kafka, Gustav, Empedokles von Akragas,in: G. Kafka, Die Vorsokratiker, Geschichteder Philosophie in Einzeldarstellungen. Abt. II. Die Philosophie des Abendlandes im Altertum, Band 6, Munich: E. Reinhadt 1921, p. 84-103 (plus notes on p. 156-159).

– Zur Physik des Empedokles, in: Philologus 78, 1923, p. 202-229.

– Zu Theophrasts De sensu, in: Philologus 72, 1913, p. 65-82. (B 99.)

Kahle, Madayo, OF 437 and the Transformation of the Soul, in: Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic Fragments in Honour of Alberto Bernabé, ed. Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui et alii, Berlin - Boston: De Gruyter 2011, (Sozomena:Studies in the recovery of ancient texts, 10), p. 153-157. (P. 156: B 115, daimôn; a very brief notice.)

Kahn, Charles H., Anaximander and the origins of Greek cosmology, New York: Columbia University Press 1960. (A 56, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 38, B 100, B 129, B 134.)

– Religion and natural philosophy in Empedocles’ doctrine of the soul, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42, 1, 1960, p. 3-35 (Reprint in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. J. P. Anton -  G. L. Kustas, Albany: SUNY 1971, p. 3-38, with appendix 'Empedocles among the Shamans' omitted latter. A revised version of the article was published in: The Pre-Socratics, ed. A. P. D. Mourelatos, Doubleday/Anchor Press 1974, then Princeton University Press 1993, p. 426-456. B 115.)

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle, I, in: Gnomon 41, 1969, p. 439-447. (Important.)

– Empedocles, in: MacMillan’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy, II. London 1969, p. 496-499.

– The art and thought of Heraclitus. An edition of the fragments with translation and commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1979. (Cosmic cycles. B 17, B 27, B 35, B 59, B 96, B 105, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 126, B 134.)

– Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. A Brief History, Indianapolis–Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 2001, p. 17-18. (E. appears as an inspired but idiosyncratic follower of Pythagoras), p. 24-25 (Harmonia, B 96.).

Kaibel, Georg, Die Prolegomena Περὶ κωμῳδίας, in: Abhandlungen der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologische - historische Klasse, Neue Folge Band 2, Nr. 4, Berlin, Weidmann 1898, p. 3-70, p. 20-21. (A 251.)

Kalogerakos, Ioannis G., Seele und Unsterblichkeit. Untersuchungen zur Vorsokratik bis Empedokles, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, Band 52, Stuttgart - Leipzig: Teubner 1996, p. 268-329.

Kamtekar, Rachana, Knowing by likeness in Empedocles, in: Phronesis, 54, 3, 2009, p. 215-238. (B 2, B 3, B 17, B 22, B 23, B 55, B 71, B 73, B 79, B 82, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 106, B 109, B 110.)

Karsten, Simon, Empedoclis Agrigentini carminum reliquiae, de vita ejus et studiis disseruit, fragmenta explicuit, philosophiam illustravit, Amsterdam: J. Müller 1838. (In Google books.)

Katsch, Julius Ferdinand, Medizinische Quellenstudien. Entwickelungsgang des Aehnlichkeitsaximos von Empedokles bis auf Hahnermann, Stuttgart: Metzler 1891. (133 p.; the position of Emp. in the history of the medicine.)

Kearns, Emily, Ancient Greek religion: a sourcebook, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2010, (Blackwell sourcebooks in ancient history, 13). (Inwood, p. 133-135, B 112, B 115, B 137.)

– ‘Remembering the ancient way of life’: Primitivism in Greek sacrificial ritual, in: Greek notions of the past in the archaic and classical eras: History without historians, ed. J. Marincola, L. Llewellyn-Jones & C. Maciver, Edinburgh University Press 2012, p. 301-316. (Empedocles: p. 308-310, B 128.)

Kechagia, Eleni, Plutarch Against Colotes. A lesson in history of philosophy, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press 2011, (Oxford Classical Monographs). 

Kelesidou, Anna (Άννα Κελεσίδου)., Εμπεδοκλης Ακραγαντίνος, Αθήνα 2002.

Kelly, Paul Joseph, Empedocles and Teilhard, in: The Teilhard Review 6/2, 1971-1972, p. 76-83.

Kenny, Anthony (Sir), A new history of Western philosophy, Volume I. Ancient philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2004. (Emp.: p. 20-24, 231. A 72, B 6, B 17, B 35, B 21, B 57, B 115, B 117, B 137, B 141, B 146. 4 elements, H2O, following D. Furley. Metempsychosis.)

– Life after Etna: The Legend of Empedocles in Literary Tradition, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 17-30.

– From Empedocles to Wittgenstein: historical essays in philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. (Life after Etna: Empedocles in prose and poetry.)

Kerényi, Károly, Pythagoras und Orpheus, in: Aufsätze zur Geschichte der Antike und des Christentums, ed. F. Altheim, K. Kerenyi, H. Russel, W. Iwanow, P. Vignaux, K. Schmid, Berlin, p. 16-49 (= K. Kerényi, Humanistische Seelenforschung, Stuttgart 1996, 14–41), See also: K. Kerényi, Pythagoras und Orpheus, Amsterdam 1940. And K. Kerényi, Pythagoras und Orpheus: Präludien zu einer zukünftigen Geschichte der Orphik und des Pythagoreismus, Dritte, erweiterte Ausgabe, Zürich: Rhein Verlag 1950, (Albae Vigiliae).

Kerferd, George Briscoe, Review of Harald A. T. Reiche: Empedocles' mixture, Eudoxan astronomy and Aristotle's connate pneuma 1960, in: The Classical Review,12 (1), 1962, p. 93-94.

–Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. i,1965, A new approach to Empedocles, in:Classical Review, 17 (2), 1967, p. 147-149.

– Review of D. O’Brien, ECC, 1969, D. O'Brien: Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle, in: Classical Review, 21 (2), 1971, p. 176-178.

–Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. ii andiii, 1969, Jean Bollack: Empédocle. ii Les Origines, iiiCommentaire i-ii, in: Classical Review,22 (3), 1972, p. 325-327.

– Review of N. van derBen, 1975, N. van der Ben, The Proem of Empedocles' Peri Physios, in:Classical Review, 28 (1), 1978, p. 167-168.

– Gorgias and Empedocles, in: Siculorum gymnasium 38, 1985, p. 595-605. [Gorgia e la sofistica: Atti del convegno internazionale (Lentini-Catania, 12–15 dic. 1983), eds. L. Montoneri and F. Romano. Catania.] 

Kerkhoff, Manfred, Empédocle et Zarathoustra: Sept versions de la mort libre, in: Les Études philosophiques 4, 1992, p. 539-554.

Kern, Otto, De Orphei Epimenidis Pherecydis theogoniis quaestiones criticae (diss.), Berlin 1888, p. 11-12. (A 501.)

– Empedokles und die Orphiker, in: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1, 1888, p. 498-508. (Published also separately as a Sonderabdruck aus d. AGPh, 12 p.)

Kerschensteiner, Jula, Kosmos. Quellenkritische Untersuchungen zu den Vorsokratikern, Munich: C. H. Beck 1962, p. 124-140. (B 26, B 27, B 28, B 134, B 135, A 32, A 58 etc.)

Kertsch, Manfred, Philologische Notizen zu Gregor von Nazianz, in: Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 29, 1980, p. 1-7. (cf. A 165.)

Ketterer, David, Empedocles in Eureka - Addenda, in: Poe Studies Dark Romanticism,18, 2, 1985.

Keuls, Eva C., The Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Classical Antiquity, Amsterdam 1974. (p. 22 et passim.)

Kidd, Ian, Some philosophical demons, in: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 40, 1995, p. 217-224. (B 115.)

Kingsley, Peter, Michael, On the Teaching of Empedocles (unpublished diss.), Cambridge University 1979.

– The Greek Origin of the Sixth-Century Dating of Zoroaster, in: Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 53, 1990, p. 245-65.

– Empedocles in Armenian, in: Revue des études arméniennes 24, 1993, p. 47-57 (A 491).

– Empedocles and his interpreters: The four-element Doxography, in: Phronesis 39, 1994, p. 235-254.

– Empedocles’ sun, in: The Classical Quarterly 44, 1994, p. 316-324. (A 561, A 30, B 44.)

– From Pythagoras to the Turba philosophorum: Egypt and Pythagorean Tradition, in: Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 57, 1994, p. 1-13.

– Greeks, Shamans and Magi, in: Studia Iranica 23, 1994, p. 187-198. (B 111.)

– Notes on air: four questions of meaning in Empedocles and Anaxagoras, in: The Classical Quarterly 45, 1995, p. 26-29. (B 38.3-4, B 78, A 49.)

– Artillery and Prophecy: Sicily in the reign of Dionysus I, in: Prometheus 21, 1995, p. 15-23.

– Meetings with Magi: Iranian Themes among the Greeks, from Xanthus of Lydia to Plato’s Academy, in: Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 5, 1995, p. 173-209.

– Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic. Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995 (19972, 20013). Translations: Empédocle et la tradition pythagoricienne, by Les Belles Lettres (2010), Archaiaphilosophia mystêria kai mageia, by Archetypo Publishing (2001), AntikFelsefe, Gizem ve Büyü, by Kabalci Yayinevi (2002), Misteri e magia nellafilosofia antica, by Il Saggiatore and Mondolibri (2007), Filosofíaantigua, misterios y magia, by Ediciones Atalanta (2008).

– Empedocles’ two poems, in: Hermes 124, 1996, p. 108-111.

– In the dark places of wisdom, Inverness (Ca.): Golden Sufi Center, 1999. (Fr. 146: p. 231-232. French translation: Dans les antres de la sagesse : études parménidiennes, traduit de l’anglais par H. D. Saffrey, Paris: les Belles Lettres 2007, (Vérité des mythes, Sources). In this translation, fr. 146: p. 185.)

– Αρχαία φιλοσοφία, μυστήρια και μαγεία : ο Εμπεδοκλής και η πυθαγόρεια παράδοση, μτφρ. Φ. Τερζάκης, Θεσσαλονίκη : Αρχέτυπο, 2001.

– Antik Felsefe Gizem ve Büyü Pythagoras ve Empedokles Geleneği,Istanbul: Kabalcı 2002.

– Empedocles for the new millennium, in: Ancient Philosophy 22, 2, 2002, p. 333-413. Published in Greek as a book by Archetypo (Thessaloniki, 2008).

– Sowers of eternity, in: Reality, Inverness (California): The Golden Sufi Center 2003, p. 309-559 (text) et 586-91 (notices). German version as Reality by Crotona Verlag. 2012. Greek version, as Archaiohellenikê skepsê kai dytikos politismos, by Dioptra Publishing. Slovenian version as Resnicnost, by Kud Logos. https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/peter-kingsley

– Misteri e magia nella filosofia antica: Empedocle e la tradizione pitagorica, Milano: Il Saggiatore 2007, (La Cultura).

– Filosofía antigua, misterios y magia : Empedocles y la tradicion pitagorica, Girona: Atalanta 2008.

– Ο ΕΜΠΕΔΟΚΛΗΣ ΣΤΟΝ 21ο ΑΙΩΝΑ (Empedocles for the New Millennium, published in Greek as a book, translation Ζάρρας Κωνσταντίνος), Thessaloniki: Αρχέτυπο 2008.

– Empédocle et la tradition pythagoricienne: Philosophie ancienne, mystère et magie, (translation by G. Lacaze of Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic), Belles Lettres, 2010, (coll. Vérité des mythes, 34).

– Catafalque: Carl Jung and the end of humanity, 1 & 2, London: Catafalque Press 2018. (Lot of bibliographical references in vol. 2, in the notes, p. 403-800.]

Kirk, Geoffrey S. & Raven, John E., The Presocratic Philosophers: a critical history with a selection of texts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1957. Several reprints with corrections: 1960, 1962, 1963, then reprints of the last print of 1963 up to 1979.  (Emp.: p. 320-361.)

Kirk, Geoffrey S. , Raven, John E. & Schofield, Malcolm, The Presocratic philosophers: a critical history with a selection of texts, second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983². Several reprints: 1984, 1985, 1987, 1988, 1990. (A title often signaled as KRS. The second edition is ruled by M. Schofield, this is important for Empedocles. Emp.: p. 280-321 [Chapter X].)

– Les philosophes présocratiques : une histoire critique avec un choix de textes, traduit de l’anglais par H.-A. de Weck sous la direction de D. J. O’Meara, Fribourg (Switzerland): Éditions Universitaires 1995, and Paris: Éditions du Cerf 1995, (Vestigia, 16, Pensée antique et médiévale). (P. 301-345, chapter X.)

Kirk, Geoffrey S., Heraclitus, The Cosmic Fragments, Cambridge University Press 19784.

Kissel , Myriam, Les Purifications d'Empédocle : ascèse et responsabilité, in: Travaux et Documents, Journée de l'Antiquité 2005-2006 (tome 1), M. Kissel (éd.), 29, janvier 2007, Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de l'Université de la Réunion, p. 109-133. (B 112, B 115, B 124, B 128, B 131, B 134, B 136, B 137, B 139.)

Knatz, Fridericus, Empedoclea, in: Schedae philologae Hermanno Usener a sodalibus Seminarii Regii Bonnensis oblatae, Bonn: F. Cohen 1891, p. 1-9. (B 6, B 38.4, B 115.3-5, B 24, B 17.25, B 121.2.)

Kofman, Sarah, Freud et Empédocle, in: Critique 265, 1969, p. 525-550.

Kohlschitter, Silke Angelika, Parmenides and Empedocles in Porphyry’s History of Philosophy, in: Hermathena 150, 1991, p. 43-53. (B 1172.)

– The Interpretation of Empedocles in the Tradition of Middle- and Neoplatonism (diss.), Dublin 1991.

Kołakowska, Katarzyna, Mit u Empedoklesa, Kraków: Wydawnictwo "Scriptum" - Tomasz Sekunda, 2012.

Koning, Hugo H., Hesiod: the other poet. Ancient reception of a cultural icon, Leiden - Boston: Brill 2010. (P. 166-170: B 115; p. 195: B 6; p. 210-217: Revelation Modified [Parmenides and Empedocles], B 3, B 131.)

Körner, U., Entstehung des Lebens: Moderne Auffassungen und naturwissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse in Bezug auf Ansichten des Empedokles, in: Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 20/2, 1971, p. 225-229.

Kouremenos Theokritos et al., The Derveni Papyrus, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki 2006, (Studi e testi per il corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, 13). (B 134.)

Krafft, Fritz, Anaxagoras und Empedokles, in: Die Grossen der Weltgeschichte I, Zürich 1971, I.466-482.

Kranz, Walther, Empedokles und die Atomistik, in: Hermes 47.1, 1912, p. 18-42.

– Die ältesten Farbenlehren der Griechen, in: Hermes 47, 1, 1912, p. 126-140. (A 41, B 21, B 23, B 29.1 (Flügel 'sieht' er als Zweige), B 67, B 71, B 128.)

– Vorsokratisches III. Die Katharmoi und die Physika des Empedokles, in: Hermes 70, 1, 1935, p. 111-119 (= W. K, Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken: Kleine Schriften, ed. von E. Vogt, Heidelberg: Winter 1967, p. 105-14). (B2, B 3, B 6, B 77-78, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 124, B 127, B 129, B 130, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 140, B 143, B 146.)

– Gleichnis und Vergleich in der frühgriechischen Philosophie, in: Hermes, 73, 1, 1938, p. 99-122.

– Kosmos und Mensch in der Vorstellung frühen Griechentums, in: Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philol. - Hist. Klasse, 1938, p. 121-161 (B 45 aj.). Reprint in Kranz W., herausgegeben von Ernst Vogt, Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken, Kleine Schriften (Heidelberg: Carl Winter 1967), p. 165-196.

– Kosmos als philosophischer Begriff frühgriechischer Zeit, in: Philologus 93, 1938, p. 430-448. (Emp.: p. 443-444, B 134.4, A 50, B 31.)

– Die griechische Philosophie: zugleich eine Einführung in die Philosophie überhaupt, Leipzig: Dieterich 1941, (Sammlung Dieterich, 88).  (Several reprints elsewhere.)

– Lukrez und Empedokles, in: Philologus 96, 1944, p. 68-107.

– Empedokles, Antike Gestalt und romantische Neuschöpfung, Zürich: Artemis 1949.

– Vorsokratische Denker: Auswahl aus dem Überlieferten - Griechisch und Deutsch, Berlin – Frankfurt: Weidmann, 1949. (Empedocles: p. 121-153.)

– Zwei kosmologische Fragen, in: Rheinisches Museum für Philosophie 100, 1957, p. 114-129.

– Die Sonne als Titan, in: Philologus, 105, 1961, p. 290-295. (B 38.)

Krell, David Farrell, Postponements: woman, sensuality and death in Nietzsche, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1986, (Studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy).

– Nietzsche Hölderlin Empedocles, in: Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 15/2, 1991, p. 31-48.

– Hölderlin's Death of Empedocles : a new translation, in: Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2008, 12, 2, p. 289-311.

– Friedrich Hölderlin. The death of Empedocles: a mourning play, translated with introduction, notes, and analysis by D. F. K., Albany: State University of New York Press 2008.

Krische, August Bernhard, Die theologischen Lehren der griechischen Denker, eine Prüfung der Darstellung Cicero's (= Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der alten Philosophie,1), Göttingen: Dieterich 1840, p. 116-129. (B 6.)

Krüger, J. S., Die plek van Empedokles in die metafisies-mistieke tradisie, in: Ηervormde teologiese studies, 63, 2, 2007, p. 409-430.

http://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/article/view/223/157

Kulig, Katarzyna [then Kolakowska], “Dlatego ogarnięci wielką nikczemnoscią, nigdy nie uwolnicie serca od smutnego cierpienia” - Empedoklejski grzech [“And this is why, seized with great wickedness, you’ll never rid your heart of sad suffering” - Empedoclean Sin], in: Roczniky humanistyczne 52/3, 2004, p. 97-108. (B 112, B 3.1-8, B 131, B 128, B 137, B 139, B 141, B 115, B 126; an unoriginal and rather superficial sketch of daimon’s cycle.)

https://kul.academia.edu/KatarzynaKo%C5%82akowska

Kurfess, Christopher John, Restoring Parmenides’ poem: essays toward a new arrangement of the fragments based on a reassessment of the original sources, Dissertation submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh, 2012. (B2, B3.) 

http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/16704/1/KurfessCJ_ETD2012.pdf

Kyriakou, Poulheria, Empedoclean Echoes in Apollonius Rhodius’ “Argonautica”, in: Hermes 122, 1994, p. 309-319. (B 272.3, B 62, B 124.)

LLL

Lackenbacher, Hans, Beiträge zur antiken Optik, in: Wiener Studien 35, 1913, p. 34-61. (Emp.: p. 39-45; B 84.)

La Croce, Ernesto, Empedocles’ Sphairos and Parmenidean Legacy, in: Platon 32-3, 1980-1, p. 114-122.

– Empédocles de Agrigento, in: Los filósofos presocráticos, II, (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, 24), Madrid: Gredos 1979 (reimpr. 1985), p. 127-294. (Most testimonies and fragments from DK, new order with a concordance table p. 417-420; many footnotes.)

La Croce, Ernesto - Eggers Lan, Conrado, Los filósofos presocráticos: Empédocles de Agrigento, Anaxágoras de Clazómenas - Introducciones, traducciones y notas, Barcelona: Planeta DeAgostini 1996. (First edition in Madrid: Gredos 1979.)

Lagrange, M-J., Introduction à l’étude du nouveau testament, 4e partie, Critique historique, I, Les mystères: l’orphisme, Paris : Gabalda et Compagnie 1937, p. 156-165.

Lahman-Kuzmić, N., Suvremenost jedne Empedoklove misli [The contemporality of Empedocles’ mind], in: Forum 1-2, 1981, p. 302-327.

Laks, André, À propos d'un livre de N. van der Ben : The Proem of Empedocles Peri Physios, in: Revue de Philologie, 52, 1978, p. 343-347.

– À propos du nouvel Empédocle: les vers 267-290 du poème physique étayent-ils l’hypothèse d’une double zoogonie?, in: Hyperboreus, 5, fasc. 1, 1999, (Bibliotheca classica petropolitana) p. 15-21. http://www.bibliotheca-classica.org/sites/default/files/laks.pdf

–  Soul, Sensation and Thought, in: The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 250-270. (B 3, B 100, B 105, B 106, B 108, B 109, B 134, B 138.) Reprint Ψυχή, Αίσθηση και Σκέψη in: Οι Προσωκρατικοί Φιλόσοφοι, Συναγωγή Συστατικών Μελετημάτων Θ. Νικολαίδης- Τ. Τυφλόπουλος (μτφρ.), Δ.Ιακώβ (επιμ.), Αθήνα: Παπαδήμα 2005, p. 361-388.

– À propos de l’édition de l'Empédocle de Strasbourg, in: Méthexis 14, 2001, p. 117-125.

– Reading the readings: On the first person plurals in the Strasburg Empedocles, in: Presocratic Philosophy, Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. V. Caston & D. W. Graham, Aldershot: Ashgate 2002, p. 127-137.

– Phénomènes et références : éléments pour une réflexion sur la rationalisation de l’irrationnel, in: Methodos, 3 (Figures de l'irrationnel), 2003, p. 9-33, http://methodos.revues.org/205 , p. 1-21. (B 111, B 112.)

– Le Vide et la haine: éléments pour une histoire archaïque de la négativité, (Collection Libelles), Paris: PUF 2004, p. 26-49. (B 17, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 147.)

– Some Thoughts about Empedoclean Cosmic and Demonic Cycles, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 265-282. (Necessity, B 115, B 128, B 146, B 147, comparison with Plato's Phaedrus: C 1.)

– Introduction à la « philosophie présocratique », Paris: PUF 2006, (Collection Libelles).

– El vacío y el odio: Elementos para una historia arcaica de la negatividad, trad. Leopoldo Iribarren, Madrid: Arena Libro 2009 (later 2010). (Cf.  Le Vide et la haine.) 

– Hystéron protéron? Des Origines aux Purifications, in: La Philologie au présent. Pour Jean Bollack, ed. C. König - D. Thouard, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 2010, (Cahiers de philologie, 27), p. 19-26.

– Phenomenon and reference: revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the problem of rationalization, in: Modernity's Classics, ed. S.C. Humphreys - R.G. Wagner, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer 2013, p. 165-186. (Empedocles: p. 177-183 ; B 111.) 

– Sur quelques modalités de la raison pratique dans les cosmo-ontologies présocratiques, in: Nature and the Best Life. Exploring the Natural Bases of Practical Normativity in Ancient Philosophy, ed. G. Rossi, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: G. Olms 2013, p. 15-41. 

– Sommeils présocratiques, in: Le Sommeil : Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquitéà la Renaissance, ed. V. Leroux, N. Palmieri, C. Pigné, Paris: Honoré Champion2015, (Sciences, techniques et civilisations du Moyen Âge à l’aube des Lumières, 16), p. 29-50. (A 85.)

Lamberton, Robert,  Homer.The Theologian : Neoplatonist allegorical reading and the growth of epic tradition, 1986 (paperpack: 1989). (In an English translation of Stobaeus: B 126.)

Lambridis, Helle, Empedocles: A Philosophical Investigation. With a Pref. Essay ‘Empedocles and T. S. Eliots” by Marshall McLuhan, Alabama : University of Alabama Press 1976.

Lambropoulou, Voula (Λαμπροπούλου, Βούλα), The Concept of Harmony in Greek Thought from Homer to Aristotle: Cosmology, in: Platon 50, 1,1998, p. 145-168. (On cosmology of Heraclitus and Emp.)

Lami, Alessandro, I Presocratici. Testimonianze e frammenti da Talete a Empedocle, Milan: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli 1991, (1995²), (I Classici della BUR).

Laminne, Jacques, Les quatre éléments : le feu, l’air, l’eau, la terre. Histoire d’une hypothèse, in: Mémoires couronnés et autres mémoires publiés par l’Académie royale […] de Belgique, Tome LXV, fasc. 2, Brussels: Hayez 1904, p. 5-194. (B 6.)

Lanata, Giuliana, 19. Empedocles, in: Poetica pre-platonica; testimonianze e frammenti, testo, traduzione e commento, Firenze: La Nuova Italia 1963, p. 128-135. (B 3, B 17, B 112, B 24, B 35, B 23.)

Lapini, Walter, La morte di Empedocle (Emped. A 1 DK), in: W. Lapini, Studi di filologia filosofica greca, Firenze: Olschki 2003, p. 91-114. 

– Empedocle e la melanconia, in: Anthropos & Iatria, 7.1, 2003, p. 48-54.

– Empedocle B 16, 2 D.-K., in: Elenchos, 2005, 26, 1, p. 111-118. (B 16.)

– Empedocle e il tempo inestinguibile (B 16 DK), in: W. Lapini, Testi frammentari e critica del testo, Problemi di filologia filosofica greca, Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 2013, p. 87-102. (New version, modified and extended, of Empedocle B 16.2 DK, in: Elenchos 26, 2005. B 16.)

– Empedocle e la lanterna (B 84.3 DK), in: W. Lapini, Testi frammentari e critica del testo, Problemi di filologia filosofica greca, Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 2013, p. 103-115. (B 84.)

Lasserre, François, Trois nouvelles citations poétiques, in: Museum Helveticum 26, 1969, p. 80-3 (chap. 1: Deux vers inédits d’Empédocle = B 152 Wright = B 153b Vítek).

Last, Hugh, Empedokles and His Klepsydra Again, in: The Classical Quarterly, 18, 1924, p. 169-73. (B 100.)

Laurenti, Renato, Bellezza e piacere nell’opera di Empedocle, in: Studi filosofici, 16, 1993, p. 7-26.

– La componente aritmo-geometrica nella teologia di Empedocle, in: Il dibattito su Parmenide. Aspetti della filosofia tra V e IV secolo, Atti del convegno, Macerata-Perugia, 24-26 marzo 1994 (never published).

– Le Proème à Apollon d’Empédocle dans les fragments d’Aristote, in: L’Aristote perdu, Atti del Convegno organizzato dal Collegium Academicum Universale philosophiae (Atene) - Centro Internazionale di Filosofia Greca “Antonio Jannone” (Atene-Roma), ed. A. Jannone et alii, Roma: Atene, 1995, p. 103-119. (B 134, B 142)

– Empedocle, Napoli: M. D’Auria editore 1999.

– Bellezza e piacere nell'opera di Empedocle, in: R. Laurenti. Scritti vari da Omero ad Arnobio, ed. P. Cosenza, Napoli: Liguori 2007. (Quaderni del Dipartimento di filosofia e politica, Università degli studi di Napoli L'Orientale, 32), p. 3-25. [Reprint of 1993]

Lazzeri, Massimo, Un verso di Empedocle frg. 10 Diels, in: Bollettino dei classici 3a ser. I, 1980, p. 25-28. 

Lebano, Giustiniano, La sfera armillare di Empedocle, Napoli 1859.

Lebedev, A. V., Orpheus, Parmenides or Empedocles? The Aphrodite verses in the Naasene treatise of Hippolytos' s Elenchos, in: Philologus 138(1), 1994, p. 24-31. (B 66, B 98, B 153, B 154d.)

Lefèvre, Eckard, E di un poeta siciliano il Prometheus desmotus, in: Orpheus 8, 1987, p. 1-13.

Legrand, Gérard, La Pensée des Présocratiques, Paris: Bordas 1970, p. 139-151. (Very general and superficial sketch of Emp. teaching.)

Lenoir, Raymond, La doctrine des quatre éléments et la philosophie ionienne, in: Revue des études grecques 40, 1927, p. 17-50. (B 6.)

Leonard, William Ellery, The Fragments of Empedocles, in: The Monist 17, 3, 1907, p. 451-474.

– Empedocles; the man, the philosopher, the poet, in: The Monist 17, 4, 1907, p. 560-569.

– The Fragments of Empedocles, translated into English verse, Chicago: Open Court 1908 (LaSalle [Illinois]: Open Court 19732).

Leone, Giuliana, Epicuro ed Empedocle, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 221-240.

Lesher, James H., Early Interest in Knowledge, in: The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 225-249. (Emp.: p. 241-245.)

Lesky, Erna, Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken, in: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Franz Steiner 1951, (Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, 1950, 19).

https://wellcomecollection.org/works/x25k8hth/items?canvas=7&langCode=ger&sierraId=b18028688 

(Emp.: Chapter “Die Wärmetheorie des Empedokles”, p. 1255-1262, other pagination as p. 31-38. A 81, B 63, B 65, B 67, B 92.)

Lieberg, Godo, Il ruolo del piacere nella filosofia di Empedocle, in: Sophia 26, 1958, p. 221-225. (A 86, par. 9.)

Lietard, G. A., Empédocle considéré comme philosophe et comme médecin, [Paris?] 1888. (19 p.; a biography of E.)

Lincoln, Bruce, Myth, cosmos, and society. Indo-European themes of creation and destruction, Cambridge (Ma)-London: Harvard University Press 1986. (Emp.: p. 35-40, 51-53, 136-138, 181-182, 189-190, 221. Sphairos and cosmic cycle as an Indo-European mythological theme. Purusa in the Aitareya Upanisad. Limbs, dismemberment. The material cosmos and the human body are complementary opposites. When the world is created, it is created out of man. And when mankind is created it is created from the cosmos. Death and resurrection are reciprocal processes, in which matter passes from microcosm to macrocosm and back again. B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 20, B 27, B 27 a, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 55, B 82, B 96, B 98, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 148.) 

– Theorizing myth, narrative, ideology, and scholarship, Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press 1999, p. 31-32, 156-159. (B 3, B 23, B 114, B 117, B131, B 146.)

Lioy, Paolo, Un filosofo di duemila anni fa, in: Rivista Sicula di Scienze, Letterature ed Arti, 3, 6, 1, 1871, p. 5-19. (Reprinted in Conferenze scientifiche, Torino, Unione Tipografico-Editrice, 1872.)

Lisi, Francisco, La relación entre la cosmología de Empédocles y la física de Platón a la luz de los nuevos descubrimientos papirológicos, in: Εὔνοια. Estudios de filosofía antigua. Un homenaje a María Isabel Santa Cruz, ed. Correa Motta, A. – Zamora Calvo, J.M., Bogotá (Universidad Nacional de Colombia): Primera 2009, p. 327-347.

Lloyd, Alfred H., A Study in the Logic of the Early Greek Philosophy: Pluralism, Empedocles and Democritus, in: Philosophical Review 10, 1901, p. 261-270. (General and quite ahistorical account of the alleged inner logic of Emp. system).

– The Coin Types of Selinus and the Legend of Empedocles, in: Numismatic Chronicle 15, 1935, p. 73-93. (A 1, par. 70.)

Lloyd, Geoffrey Ernest Richard, Right and left in Greek philosophy, in: The Journal of Hellenic Studies 82, 1962, p. 56-66. Reprint in Methods and Problems 1991. 

– Who is attacked in On Ancient Medicine?, in: Phronesis 8, 1963, p. 108-126. Reprint in Methods and Problems 1991. (A 71.) 

– The hot and the cold, the dry and the wet in Greek philosophy, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 84, 1964, p. 92-106. (B 21). Reprint in Methods and Problems 1991. 

– Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge 1966 (19872, 19923).

– Demystifying mentalities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990. (About metaphors: p. 21-25.) 

– Methods and Problems in Greek Science: Selected Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 (19932)

– Review of B. Inwood, Brad Inwood (ed., tr.): The Poem of Empedocles, in: The Classical Review 43.1, 1993, p. 164.

– Αρχαία ελληνική επιστήμη. Από τον Θαλή ώς τον Αριστοτέλη, μτφρ. Π. Καρλέτσα, Ηράκλειο : Πανεπιστημιακές εκδόσεις Κρήτης, 2005. P. 46-53 (Εμπεδοκλής).

Lobeck, Christian August, Phrynichi Eclogae nominum et verborum Atticorum cum notis P. J. Nunnesii, D. Hoeschelii, J. Scaligeri et Cornelii de Pauw edidit, explicuit Ch. A. L., In libraria Weidmannia, Lipsiae 1820, p. 609 (B 125: ἀλλογνῶτι) and 732 (B 115.4: ἁμαρτήσας).

– Aglaophamus sive de theologiae mysticae graecorum causis I-II, Regimontii 1829.

– Pathologiae sermonis Graeci, Lipsiae 1843 (some emendations: B 19, B 78, B 100.23).

– Ῥηματικόν sive verborum Graecorum et nominum verbalium technologia, Sumtu Fratrum Borntraeger, Regimontii 1846, p. 201 and 355, n. 6 (the emendations of B 90.2 and B 137.2-3).

Loeffler, Annette, Ancrageénonciatif, mise en discours et pragmatique - Cosmos et situation decommunication dans les fragments d’Empédocle, in: Sémiotiques, 10, juin 1996, p. 123-136. 

http://www.revue-texto.net/Parutions/Semiotiques/SEM_n10_8.pdf 

Loew, Emanuel, Die Vorsokratiker über Veränderung, Wahrheit und Erkenntnismöglichkeit, in: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 81, 2, 1932, p. 104-128. (Emp.: p. 106-114, B 2, B 17, B 21, B 26, B 110.)

– Empedokles, Anaxagoras und Demokrit, in: Wiener Studien, 55, 1937, p. 32-47. (B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 106, B 107, B 108, B 110, B 132, B 134.)

Lommatzsch, Bernhard Heinrich Carl, Die Weisheit des Empedokles nach ihren Quellen [...], Berlin: G. Reimer 1830. Reprint in Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2018. (Speculative account of the principal Empedoclean theses plus the translation of fragments.)

Lombardo, Stanley, Parmenides and Empedocles. The Fragments in Verse Translation, San Francisco: Grey Fox 1982.

Long, Anthony A., Thinking and sense-perception in Empedocles: mysticism or materialism?, in: The Classical Quarterly, 16, 2, 1966, p. 256-276.

– Review of D. O’Brien, ECC, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 90, 1970, p. 238-239. (Unimportant.)

– Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the Sixties, in: The Pre-Socratics, ed. A. P. D. Mourelatos, Princeton: Princeton University Press19932 (New York : Anchor Press 19741), p. 397-425. (B 17, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 35, B 62, B 98.)

Long, Herbert Strainge., A Study of the Doctrine of Metempsychosis in Greece from Pythagoras to Plato (diss.), Princeton 1948 (19421). (A 72, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 126, B 127, B 129, B 147.)

– Plato’s doctrine of metempsychosis and its source, in: The Classical Weekly, 41, 10, 1948, p. 149-155. 

– The unity of Empedocles’ thought, in: American Journal of Philology 70, 1949, p. 142-158.

Longo, Angela, Empedocle e l'allegoria nella Confutazione di tutte le eresie attribuita a Ippolito di Roma, in: Des évêques, des écoles et des hérétiques. Actes du colloque international sur la Réfutation de toutes les hérésies, Genève, 13-14 juin 2008, ed. G. Aragione - E. Norelli, Lausanne: Éditions du Zèbre 2011, p. 119-133.

Longo, Oddone, Simbiogenesi Empedoclea, in: Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica 1999, p. 129-152. (B 57 - B 62, B 97 etc.)

Longrigg, James, Philosophy and medicine: some early interactions, in: Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 67, 1963, p. 147-175. 

–Galen on Empedocles (fragment 67), in: Philologus 108, 1964, p. 297-300. (B 67.)

– Empedocles’s fiery fish, in: Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 28, 1965, p. 314-315. (Respiration, heat, vital heat, cooling water, A 73.)

– Κρυσταλλοειδῶς, in: The Classical Quarterly, 15, 2, 1965, p. 249-251. (Empedocles' similes, vault of the outer heaven, salt, A 30, A 51, A 54, A 66, B 56.)

– Roots, in: The Classical Review, 17, 1, 1967, p. 1-4. (Elements, particles, mixture, sun, fire, Sphaîros, A 41, A 43, B 27.)

– Ice of Bronze (Lucretius I.493), in: The Classical Review, 20, 1970, p. 8-9. (Metaphors, similes, fire in a solidifying role, A 69.)

– Zeno’s Cosmology, in: The Classical Review, 22, 1972, p. 170-171.

– Empedocles’ Fertile Fish (B 74), in: Journal of Hellenic Studies, 94, 1974, p. 173-174. (B 74.)

– Empedocles, Juno, and De Natura Deorum ii. 66, in: The Classical Review, 24, 1974, p. 173. (B 6.)

– Two Notes on Theophrastus De sensibus, in: Philologus 119, 1975, p. 163-169. (A 86, par. 1 a 9, B 99.)

– The “Roots of All Things”, in: Isis, 67, 1976, p. 420-438. (B 6.)

– A seminal 'debate' in the fifth century B.C.?, in: Aristotle on nature and living things: Philosophical and Historical Studies presented to David M. Balme on His Seventieth Birthday, ed. A. Gotthelf, Pittsburgh - Bristol: Mathesis publications, Bristol Classical Press 1985, p. 277-287. (A 68, A 77, A 78, A 79, A 82, A 84, B 68, B 70, B 92, B 98, B 105, B 150.) 

– Elements and After: a study in presocratic physics of the second half of the fifth century, in: Apeiron, 19.2, p. 93-115.

– Presocratic Philosophy and Hippocratic Medicine, in: History of Science, 27, 1, 1989, p. 1-39. (A 74, B 6, B 21, B 23, B 111.) 

– Empedocles and the plague of Selinus: a cock and bull story?, in: Tria Lustra: Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent Founder and Editor of Liverpool Classical Monthly by Some of Its Contributors on the Occasion of the 150th Issue, Issue 3 of Liverpool classical papers, ed. H.D. Jocelyn - H. Hurt, Liverpool: Liverpool Classical Monthly 1993, p. 29-34. (B 111, A 1, par. 70.)

– Greek rational medicine: philosophy and medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians, London: Routledge 1993. (A 77, A 78, A 79, A 85, A 86, B 6, B 21, B 65, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 105, B 111.)

Lonie, Ian M., Medical Theory in Heraclides of Pontus, in: Mnemosyne 4/18, 1965, p. 126-143. (A 1, par. 60-1, ad B 1152.)

– On the Botanical Excursus in De natura pueri, in: Hermes 97, 1969, p. 391-411.

López Eire, A., Sobre los orígines de la oratoria I, in: Minerva 1, 1987, p. 13-31.

Lo Presti, Roberto, Empedocle su percezione e cognizione, p. 30-39, in: In forma di senso: l'encefalocentrismo del trattato ippocratico Sulla malattia sacra nel suo contesto epistemologico. Roma: Carocci 2008. (Studi e ricerche. Sezione greca / Aglaia, Dipartimento di studi greci, latini e musicali, Università di Palermo; 10.)

Lortzing, Franz, Bericht über die griechischen Philosophen vor Sokrates für die Jahre 1876-1897: Empedokles. 1. Zur Kritik uud Erklärung der Fragmente. 2. Zur Lehre und zum Leben des Empedokles, in: Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, 116, 1904, p. 31-60. (Reinach, Diels, Blass, Bergk, Knatz, Gomperz, Platt, Ward, Radloff, Wieck.)

– Review of C. E. Millerd, Empedocles, in: Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 31/22, 1911, col. 665-673.

Lorusso, AM., Dal semplice al complesso: valenza strutturale e didattica della tecnica dell'eco in Empedocle, in: Quaderni del Dipartimento di filologia linguistica e tradizione classica «Augusto Rostagni», n. s. 4 - 2005, Bologna: Pàtron 2006, p. 109-124.

Lovejoy, Arthur O., The Meaning of Φυσις in the Greek Physiologers, in: The philosophical Review, 18, 4, 1909, p. 369-383. (B 8, B17, B 63, B 110.)

Luchte, James, Early Greek thought: before the dawn, London - New York: Continuum 2011. (Chap. 11: Love, Strife and Mind – Empedocles and Anaxagoras.)

Luciani, Sabine, Philosophie et esthétique du mouvement dans le “De rerum natura”, in: Présence de Lucrèce: Actes du colloque tenu à Tours 3-5 Décembre 1998, ed. Rémy Poignault, Université de Tours 1999, p. 65-76. (A comparison of Lucretius with Democritus and Emp.)

Ludwich, Arthur, Aristarchs homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos, II, Leipzig: Teubner 1885. (P. 308-311 and 321-322. Useful for a count of 455 verses with spondees [S] and/or dactyls [D], and a comparaison with Homer, Hesiod and other authors writing in hexameters.)

Lüth, Johann Christoph, Die Struktur des Wirklichen im empedokleischen System “Über die Natur”, Meisenheim am Glan: Hain 1970.

MMM

MMM

Maass, Ernst, Orpheus. Untersuchungen zur griechischen römischen altchristlichen Jenseitsdichtung und Religion, Munich: C. H. Beck 1895. (B 115.1-2, B 121.3.)

Maas, Paul, Zu Abdankungsgedicht des Nikolaos Muzalon: I. Literarisches, in: Byzantinische Zeitschrift 35, 1935, p. 2-7. (B 121.2 and 4.)

– in: Byzantinische Zeitschrift 36, 1936, p. 456-457. (B 143.)

– Greek Metre, Oxford 1962.

Macauley, David Mark, Be-wildering Order: Toward an Ecology of the Elements in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Beyond (diss.), State University of New York - Stony Brook 1998. 

– The Flowering of Environmental Roots and the Four Elements in Presocratic Philosophy: From Empedocles to Deleuze and Guattari, in: World Views: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, Volume 9, Number 3, 2005, p. 281-314. (B 6).

– Elemental Philosophy: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water as Environmental Ideas, Albany (NY): SUNY Press, 2010. (P. 103-136: The Flowering of Ecological Roots: Empedocles elemental thought. See on-line: Gruen, Lori (2012) "Review of "Elemental Philosophy: Earth, Air, Fire, and Water as Environmental Ideas",in: Essays in Philosophy, 13, 1, Article 22 

http://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1421&context=eip - B 6.)

Mace, Sarah T., Review of L'Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666) by Alain Martin and Oliver Primavesi, in: Classical World, 95, 2, 2002, p. 195-197.

Macris, Constantinos, Pythagore, un maître de sagesse charismatique de la fin de la période archaïque, in: Carisma profetico. Fattore di innovazione religiosa, ed. Giovanni Filoramo, Brescia 2003, p. 249-289. (P. 255-7: B 129.)

Macris, Constantinos - Skarsouli, Pénélope, La sagesse et les pouvoirs du mystérieux τις du fragment 129 d’Empédocle, in: Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 75, 3, 2012, p. 357-377. (B 129) - 

Madvig, Johan Nicolas, Adversaria critica ad scriptores graecos et latinos I: De arte conjecturali. Emendationes graecae, Hauniae: Sumptibus Librariae Gyldendalianae (F. Hegel) 1871, p. 656. (B 5.)

Maggi, Paolo, La “Clessidra” di Empedocle ed un vasetto della Ca’ Morta, in: Rivista archeologica dell’antica provincia e diocesi di como 170, 1988, p. 5-10. (B 100.9.)

Malengreau, P., De la pensée d’Empédocle à la mythologie freudienne, in: Revue de psychologie et des sciences de l’éducation 6, 1971, p. 330-354.

Manetti, Daniela, Valore semantico e risonanze culturali della parola φύσις, in: La Parola del Passato, 1973, p. 426-444. ( Β 8, A 732).

Mansfeld, Jaap, Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt, Assen 1964.

– Heraclitus on the Psychology and Physiology of Sleep and on Rivers, in: Mnemosyne 20, 1967, p. 1-29 (p. 23: B 105)

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle, I, 1965, in: Mnemosyne, 21, 4, 1968, p. 426-428.

– Ambiguity in Empedocles B 17.3-5, in: Phronesis 17, 1972, p. 17-39. (B 8, B 9, B 12, B 17.)

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. Part 2: Les Origines, fragments et témoignages. Part 3: Les Origines, Commentaire. 1969, in: Mnemosyne 31, 2, 1978, p. 207-209.

– Providence and the destruction of the universe in early stoic thought, in: Studies in Hellenistic Religions, ed. M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden: Brill 1979, p. 129-188. Reprinted as Study I in Mansfeld, J., Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot. (Zeno of Citium and Empedocles: p. 170-173.)

– Bad world and demiurge: A ‘gnostic’ motif from Parmenides and Empedocles to Lucretius and Philo, in: Studies in Gnosticism and Hellenistic Religions presented to Gilles Quispel on the Occasion of his 65-th Birthday, ed. R. van der Broek & M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden: Brill 1981, p. 261-314. Reprinted as Study XIV in Mansfeld, J., Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot. (Emp.: p. 278-290. A 30, A 37, A 42, A 49, A 68, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23,  B 26-28, B 30-31, B 35, B 54, B 52, B 57-B 98, B 112, B 115, B 116, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 146, B 147.)

– Heraclitus, Empedocles, and others in a Middle Platonist Cento in Philo of Alexandria, in: Vigiliae Christianae 39, 1985, p. 131-156. Reprinted as Study VII in Mansfeld, J., Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot.  (B 16, B 115, B 117, B 121).

– Review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981, in:  Mnemosyne, 38, 1-2, 1985, p. 183-188. 

– Die Vorsokratiker II: Zenon, Empedokles, Anaxagoras, Demokrit. Griechisch/Deutsch. Auswahl der Fragmente, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen von J. M., Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 1986, (Universal-Bibliothek, Nr. 7966). (7. Kapitel Empedokles, p. 56-155.)

– Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot. 

– Heresiography in context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a source for Greek philosophy, Leyden - New York - Köln: Brill 1992. 

(P.50-52: “Pythagoras, Empedocles, Heraclitus, Plato and Aristotle”. P. 208-231: “ThePythagorean tradition, continued: Empedocles and Heraclitus”. B 6, B 16, B 30,B 21, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119.](B 6, B 16, B 30, B 21, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119.)

– A Lost Manuscript of Empedocles’ Katharmoi, in: Mnemosyne 4/47, 1994, p. 79-82.

– Insight by Hindsight. Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems, in: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 40, 1995, p. 225-232. (P. 227: B 6.)

– Critical Note: Empedocles and his interpreters, in: Phronesis 40, 1, 1995, p. 109-115 (a refutation of P. Kingsley’s article in: Phronesis 39, 1994, p. 235-254; A 33, B 6). Reprinted withlight modifications in Critical note: Empedoclesand his interpreters, in: Mansfeld J., Runia D.T. Aëtiana, III, studies inthe doxographical traditions of ancient philosophy, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2010, (Philosophiaantiqua, 118), p. 333-340.

– Aristote et la structure du De sensibus de Théophraste, in: Phronesis 41/2, 1996, p. 158-188. (Mainly for Empedocles: p. 161-3 and 175-7; B 106, B 108, B 63, B 109, B 107, B 105, A 86.)

– Parménide et Héraclite avaient-ils une théorie de la perception?, in: Phronesis 44/4, 1999, p. 326-346. (Mainly for Empedocles: p. 334-335, 344.)

– Book notes: Presocratics, in: Phronesis, 50, 4, 2005, p. 335-345. (Review of S. Trépanier, Empedocles. An interpretation, 2004.)

– Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle: Les Purifications. 2003, in: Mnemosyne, 59, 3, 2006, p. 467-468.

– Aristotle on Anaxagoras in relation to Empedocles in Metaphysics A, in: Philologus, 155/2, 2011, p. 361-366.

Mansfeld, Jaap - Algra, Keimpe, Interpretative Thêtas in the Strasbourg Empedocles,in: Empsychoi logoi––Religious innovations in Antiquity. Studies in honour of Pieter Willem van der Horst, ed. Houtman A. - De Jong A. and M. Misset-van de Weg M., Leiden - Boston: Brill 2008, (Ancient Judaism and early Christianity, 73). (B 17, B 20, B 26, B 35, B 36, B 115, B 139, a(i) 6, c 3, d 5-6.)

Mansfeld Jaap - Primavesi Oliver, Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch / Deutsch, ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert von J. 

Mansfeld und O. Primavesi, Philipp Reclam jun., Stuttgart 2011. Reprint with minor addenda and corrigenda in 2012, Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, Bd. 18971.

Manuli, Paola & Vegetti, Mario, Cuore, sangue e cervello. Biologia e antropologia nel pensiero antico, Milan: Episteme 1977, (Monografie, 7). (Reprint by Petite Plaisance, Pistoia, 2009, (Il giogo). P. 55-71.)

Marcinkowska-Rosół, Maria, Diogenes Laertios: Epigramy o Empedoklesie (VIII 75), in: Meander 1-4, 2008.

– Empedocles B 105 and the definition of human mind, in: Eranos 105, 2008-2009, p. 118-123. (B 105.)

Marcovich, Miroslav, Heraclitus, Merida: The Los Andes University Press 1967. 

Margoliouth, David Samuel, The Poetics of Aristotle, London-New-York-Toronto: Hodder and Stoughton 1911. (B 138, B 143.)

Marin, Maurizio, Empedocle, il Pitagorico di Afrodite, in: Salesianum 60, 1998, p. 65-80.

Marioti, I., Tradurre i poeti greci, in: La traduzione dei classici greci e latini in Italia oggi: problemi, prospettive, iniziative editoriali, a cura di P. Ianni - I. Mazzini, Macerata 1992, p. 87-98.

Markovic, Daniel, Vergil’s Empedoclean Universe, in: Lucida intervalla 43, 2014, p 67-90. (B 128.)

http://emu.f.bg.ac.rs/lucidaintervalla/issues/43(2014).pdf

Marmodoro, Anna, Empedocles's metaphysics, in: Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 1-4. On-line at degruyer.com.

Marshall,Hallie, Rebecca, Plutarch as a source forEmpedocles, Thesis for the degree of Master of Arts, Memorial University ofNewfoundland (Canada), 2002.

Marsoner, Agostino, Sul fr. 128 di Empedocle, in: Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell’ Università di Napoli 15, n. s. III, 1972-3, p. 5-10. (B 128.)

– A proposito di una recente edizione di Empedocle, in: Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofie dell’ Università di Napoli 17, 1974-5, p. 43-48.

– Studi Empedoclei, in: La Parola del Passato 38/209, 1983, p. 150-160.

– Forma et pensiero nella filosofia greca arcaica, Galatina: Congedo 1992, (Università degli studidella basilicata - Potenza, 10). (P. 117-146 - chap. VI: B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 26, B 30, B 35, B 131, B 133, B 134.)

Martano, Giuseppe, Bagliori della chimica moderna in Empedocle d’ Agrigento, in: Kokalos 9, 1963, p. 3-18. Reprinted in Martano, G., Studi di storia del pensiero antico, Napoli-Firenze, 1968, p. 53-81.

– Il senso del concreto nei contributi sicelioti alla storia del pensiero greco, in: Kokalos 14-5, 1968-9, p. 280-294.

– Suggestioni Empedoclee nella poesia di Hölderlin, in Discorsi 2/2, 1982, p. 197-211.

– Physis, arete, dike nella cultura greca dell’età arcaica, in: Elenchos 8, 1987, p. 25-41 (A 732).

Martin, Alain, Un papyrus inédit d’Empédocle dans la collection de Strasbourg, in: Gnomon 67, 1995, p. 734-735.

– D’Achmîm à Strasbourg, sur les traces d’Empédocle, in: Bulletin de la classe des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques - Académie royale de Βelgique, 6/8, 1997, p. 121-137.

– L’Empedocle di Strasburgo: aspetti papirologici, in: Elenchos 19/2, 1998, p. 65-80. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.)

– Le papyrus de Strasbourg, in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, III, ed. R. Goulet, Paris: C.N.R.S.-Éditions 2000, p. 67-70.

– Review of Brad Inwood, The Poem of Empedocles, revised edition, 2000,” L’Antiquité Classique, 71, 2002, p. 257-258. (Papyrus of Strasburg.)

– Empédocle, Fr. 142 D.-K. Nouveau regard sur un papyrus d’Herculanum, in: Cronache Ercolanesi 33, 2003, p. 43-52. (B 6, B 62, B 115, B 120, B 142.)

– Empedocle poeta. Alcune considerazioni sul fr. B 152 DK, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, p. 15-29. (B 152.)  

– Review of Annette Rosenfeld-Löffler, La poétique d’Empédocle. Cosmologie et métaphore, in: L’Antiquité Classique, 76, 2007, p. 246-247.

– Dans l’atelier de la traductrice, avec Marguerite Yourcenar, in: Le médecin et le livre. Hommages à Marie-Hélène Marganne, ed. Antonio Ricciardetto et al., Lecce: Pensa Multimedia 2021, (Fuori Collana), p. 531-544. (B 20.)

Martin, Alain - Primavesi, Oliver, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg: (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666). Introduction, édition et commentaire, with an English summary, Strasbourg- Berlin-New York: Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg - W. de Gruyter 1999.

Martin, Hubert, Jr., Plutarch’s Citation of Empedocles at Amatorius 756 D, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10, 1969, p. 57-70. (B 17.)

Martin, Thomas-Henri, Mémoire sur les hypothèses astronomiques des plus anciens philosophes de la Grèce étrangers à la notion de la sphéricité de la terre, in: Mémoires de l'Institut national de France, Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 29, 2ème partie, 1879, p. 29-252. (Emp.: p. 211-235.)

Martínez Nieto, Roxana, Beatriz, Particularidades morfológico-semánticas del léxico de Empédocles, in: Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, ed. Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde & Ramón González Ruiz, Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2008, p. 561-566.  (B 5, B 12, 24, B 25, B 35, B 49, B 51, B 56, B 61, B 122, B 129, B 134, B 148.)

http://dspace.unav.es/dspace/bitstream/10171/21069/1/Particularidades%20morfol%C3%B3gico%20sem%C3%A1nticas%20del%20l%C3%A9xico.pdf

Mastrofili, M., Il sistema fisiologico di Empedocle di Agrigento, Napoli: Giannini 1914.

Matsumoto, A., A Study on the Fragments of Gorgias, in: The Hiroshima University Studies 26, 1966, p. 29-50.

Mauduit, Christine, Les miracles d’Empédocle ou la naissance d'un thaumaturge, in: Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé 4, 1998 (février 1999), p. 289-309 (B 111).

Mauduit, Christine & Saetta Cottone, Rossella, Voir ou entendre : faut-il choisir ? Une analyse de la réception théâtrale dans le prologue des Thesmophories, in: Cahiers des études anciennes, 51, 2014, p. 45-73. (Empedocles: p. 61- 68; A 56, B 84,)

http://etudesanciennes.revues.org/789

McClelland, Norman C., Encyclopedia of reincarnation and karma, Jefferson - London: McFarland & Company 2010. (P. 87: Empedocles.)

McDiarmid, John B., Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes, in: Harvard Studies in Classical Philology  61, 1953, p. 85-156. (Emp.: p. 106-109.)

McEvilley, Thomas, The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophy, New York: Allworth Press 2002. (Emp.: p. 67-71:  Emp. cosmic cycle; p. 106-107: Emp. and Orphism, p. 304-307: Emp. and elements).

McGonagill, Gary Lance, A history of allegorical interpretation from Homer through Lucretius, Thesis in classical philosophy, Harvard University (Cambridge Ma.), 2001. (Empedocles: p. 69-78. A patchwork of several selected readings. Influenced by Kingsley.)

McIntosh Snyder, Jane, Lucretius' Empedoclean Sicily, in: The Classical World, 65, 7, 1972, p. 217-218.

McKirahan, Richard D., Jr., Philosophy before Socrates: an introduction with texts and commentary, Indianapolis - Cambridge: Hackett 1994, p. 232-291. (Fragments and commentaries.)

– Assertion and Argument in Empedocles’ Cosmology or, what did Empedocles learn from Parmenides?, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 163-89 (B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17.30-3).

– Philosophy before Socrates: an introduction with texts and commentary, (Second Edition), Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett 2010. (Empedocles: p. 230-292).

Megino Rodríguez, Carlos, Orfeo y el Orfismo en la poesía de Empédocles: influencias y paralelismos, Colección de Estudios, Madrid: UAM Ediciones 2005. See review by J.-C. Picot: 

https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2007/2007.11.02

– Aportación del papiro de Estrasburgo (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666) a la comprensión de la demonología de Empédocles, in: Actas del XI Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, Antonio Alvar Ezquerra (ed.), 2, Madrid, 2005, p. 423-434.

– La concepción empedoclea de la miseria humana: entre psicología, religión y moralidad, p. 55-63, in: La dignità e la miseria dell'uomo nel pensiero europeo. Atti del convegno internazionale di Madrid, 20-22 maggio 2004, ed. Guido M. Cappelli, Roma: Salerno, 2006. (Studi e saggi ; 40.) (B 2, B3, B 4, B 5,  B 11, B 15, B 110, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 124, B 129, B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.)

– Empédocles y el orfismo, in: Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, 2, ed. A. Bernabé & F. Casadesús, Madrid: Akal 2008, p. 1105-1140.

– La transmigración en la poesía de Empédocles, in: Reencarnación: La transmigración de las almas entre Oriente y Occidente, ed. A. Bernabé, M. Kahle & M. A. Santamaría Álvarez, Madrid: Abada 2011, p. 269-282.

Mele, Alfonso, Empedocle e Agrigento, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, p.179-188.

Meriani, Angelo, Ἀναίσιμος: da Plutarco ad Empedocle (Emp., fr. 27 a D.- K. = Plut., mor., 777c) , in: Contributi di filologia greca, ed. I. Gallo, Naples: Arte Tipografica 1990, p. 121-125. (B 27a.)

Merker, Anne, La vision chez Platon et Aristote, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2003, (International Plato Studies, 16).  (P. 26-30:· B 84; p. 48-9: A 92).

Merzdorf, Reinhold, Quaestiunculae Empedocleae, in: Commentationes philologae, scripserunt Seminarii Philologi Regii Lipsiensis... sodales, G. Curtio dicatae, Leipzig: Giesecke und Devrient 1874, p. 41-56.(Detailed study of the different forms of declensions and rare forms found in the verses of Empedocles, in particular in comparison with the Homeric forms.)

Messina, Gaetano, Il lessico di Empedocle, Testo critico dei frammenti, commento alle variae lectiones e indice delle concordanze, in: Index Empedocleus, ed. G. Imbraguglia, G. S. Badolati, R. Morchio, A. M. Battegazzore & G. Messina, Genova 1991, I., p. 81-212. Indice delle concordanze, in: Index Empedocleus, Genova 1991, II. p. 214-515.

– Empedocle “rivisitato”: testo, traduzione e commento dei frammenti di Strasburgo (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666), in: Giornale di Metafisica 24, 2002, p. 5-69. (B 17, Pap. Strasb.)

– Una nuova lettura di Empedocle 100 DK, in: Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, 27, 2005, p. 777-787. (B 100.)

– Dalla fisica di Senofane all'Empedocle di Strasburgo: studi di filosofia presocratica, Bari: Levante editori 2007, ('Le Rane', 48). (P. 101-165: Empedocle “rivisitato", already published  in: Giornale di metafisica 24, 2002; p. 167-176: Una nuova lettura di Empedocle 100 DK, which is a favourable reading of Rossetti's article Empedocle scienziato, and already published in Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, 27, 2005.)

Mesturini, Anna Maria, L’eclissi di sole in Empedocle e Lucrezio, in: Studi italiani in filologia classica 80, 1987, p. 173-180.

– Per una nuova interpretazione del fr. 93 D.-K. di Empedocle, in: Bolletino dei classici 13, 1992, p. 107-116. (B 73.)

Metropoulos, K., Ιατρικα προσωκρατικων φιλοσοφων, in: Platon 15, 1963, p. 196-217 (Emp.: p. 212-214).

Métral A., Compte rendu de Memorie sulla vita d'Empedocle Gergentino di Domenico Scinà (1813), Bulletin  des sciences historiques, Antiquité, Philologie, IV, 1825, p. 313-314.

Michelini, Ann, Norris, The Dance of the Elements: Fragment B 17 of Empedocles, in: Power and Spirit, ed. S. Jäkel, (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, B, 199), Turku (Finland): Turun Yliopisto 1993, p. 27-41. (B 17, B 27.)

Mikalson, Jon D., Greek Popular Religion in Greek Philosophy, Oxford University Press 2010. (Empedocles: p. 69-70, A 11, B 128, B 136, B 137.)

Miller, Patrick Lee, Becoming God: pure reason in early Greek philosophy, London - New York: Continuum 2011. (Several quotations through the book.  Some pages dedicated to Empedocles: p. 72-74.)

Millerd (Smertenko), Clara Elizabeth, On the Interpretation of Empedocles (diss.), Chicago 1908 (New York 19802).

Minar, Edwin L., Cosmic periods in the philosophy of Empedocles, in: Phronesis 8, 1963, p. 127-145. (Reprint in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, ed. J. P. Anton -  G. L. Kustas, Albany: SUNY 1971, p. 39-58.)

– Pre-Socratic Studies, 1953-1966, in: Classical World 60.4,1966, p.143-163. (Empedocles: p. 160.)

Minz, Hubert, Anfänge des Naturrechts bei Empedokles (diss.), Bonn 1960.

– Anfänge des Naturrechts bei Empedokles und ein Vergleich mit dem Naturrecht des Sophisten Antiphon, Inaugural - Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Hohen Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Köln, Bonn: G. Menden 1960. (B 9, B 135.)

Misener, Geneva, Loxus, Physician and Physiognomist, in: Classical Philology 18/1, 1923, p. 1-22. (A 97; a role of blood in Emp. theory of soul and thinking; not very informative and decisive for Emp. studies, but with interesting parallels in medicinal and philosophic speculations in 5th and 4th B. C.)

Mondolfo, Rodolpho, [Introduzione, 3] Il confronto con Empedocle: la « coincidentia oppositorum » e il ciclo cosmico, in: Eraclito. Testimonianze, imitazioni. Introduzione, traduzione e commento a cura di Rodolfo Mondolfo e Leonardo Tarán, Firenze: La nuova Italia 1972, (Biblioteca di studi superiori, 59), p. cxxix-cxxxix. Reprint in Eraclito. Testimonianze, imitazioni e frammenti, con i testi greci, ed. R. Mondolfo, L. Tarán, & M. Marcovich, Milano: Bompiani 2007, (Il Pensiero Occidentale), p. cxxix-cxxxix. In that book see also “Imitazioni” for Empedocles, p. 194-198 (written by R. M.). (B 3.9-14, B 16, B 17.1-2 and 16-17, B 17.3-5, B 106, B 110.3-5, B 135.)

Montano, Aniello, Senso e ragione nella gnoseologia di Empedocle di Agrigentino, in: Montano, A, Methodos: Aspetti dei metodi e dei processi cognitivi nella Grecia Antica, Napoli: Loffredo 2014, (σκέψις, 25), p. 25-65 (chapter 3).

Montevecchi, Federica, Sulla complessità di Empedocle. Per un bilancio storiografico, in: Hortus Musicus, Anno VI, 21, 2005, p. 128-131.

– review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, eds. L. Rossetti, C. Santaniello , in Hypnos, 17, 2006, p. 139-142. Review in: Hypnos

– L'eterno movimento della physis. Alcune riflessioni su Empedocle di Agrigento, in: La società degli individui, 28, 2007, p. 9-21.

– Empedocle fra mythos e logos, in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 71-82. (B 6, B 42,  B 134.)

– Empedocle d'Agrigentino, Napoli: Liguori 2010.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qo25qX5r1o : "Empedocle: il discorso dell'antichità su amicizia e contesa." 12 November 2011.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1yA-jF1bi4 : "Amore e odio: Empedocle e Freud", Secondo incontro della terza edizione del corso base di formazione filosofica "Pensare la vita". 7 March 2013. 

Montuori, M., Chi sono i σοφισταί in Aristoph. Nub. vv. 332-338, in: Atti della accademia di scienze morali e politiche de la sozieta nazionale di scienze 97, 1986, p. 7-15.

Morana Cyril, Oudin Eric, Découvrir la philosophie antique, Paris: Eyrolles 2009. (Empedocles: p. 25-27.)

Morchio, Renzo, La “fisica” di Empedocle tra cosmologie e genetica, in: Index Empedocleus I, Genova 1991, p. 49-68.

Moreno, Inmaculada Rodríguez, ΔΑΙΜΟΝΕΣ, ΗΡΩΕΣ Υ ΑΓΓΕΛΟΙ en la filosofía presocrática, in: Habis 26, 1995, p. 29-46. (Empedocles: p. 37-40. B 21, B 23, B 59, B 112, B 115, B 126, B 134.)

Morgan, Kathryn A., Myth and philosophy from the pre-Socratics to Plato, Cambridge University Press, 2000. (Empedocles: p. 59-62.)

Morgan Michael L, Review of Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic- Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition by P. Kingsley, in: The American Historical Review, 102, 4, 1997, p. 1129-1131.

Mori, Luca, Empedocle alla luce della complessità, in: I Quaderni del Ramo d'Oro on-line, 4, 2011, p. 121-133.

 http://www.qro.unisi.it/frontend/sites/default/files/Empedocle_alla_luce_della_complessit%C3%A0.pdf

[A 74, B26, B 30, B 100.]

Moriani, Fausto, Materia comune e generazione degli elementi in Aristotele, in: Elenchos 9, 1988, p. 329-351. (On the beginning of De gen. et corr. Aristotle criticized Emp. conception of 4 elements).

Morley, John, Empedocles and Diderot, in: Fortnightly Review 1, 1875, p. 786.

Moriss, S. P., Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1992, p. 221. (B 62.)

Morrison, J. S., Parmenides and Er, in: Journal of Hellenic Studies 75, 1955, p. 59-68.

– Passages from Aristophanes and Euripides, in: Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, New Series, 16 (196), 1970, p. 83-90.

(Storm of the elements.)

Mortley, R. J., The Bond of the Cosmos: A Significant Metaphor (Tim. 31c ff.), in: Hermes 97, 1969, p. 372-373.

Most, Glenn W., The poetics of early Greek Philosophy, in: The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 332-362.

– The Stillbirth of a Tragedy: Nietzsche and Empedocles, in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 31-44.

– ἄλλος δ’ ἐξ ἄλλου δέχεται. Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic, in: Literatur und Religion, 1,1, Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, ed. Bierl, A.- Lämmle, R.- Wesselmann, K., Berlin-New York: W. De Gruyter 2007, (MythosEikonPoiesis 1/1), p. 271–302. (B 115.)

Motte, André, Prairies et jardins de la Grèce antique: de la religion à la philosophie, Bruxelles: Palais des Académies 1973. (B 17, B 21, B 27, B 35, B 66, B 98, B 112, B 134, B 146.)

– Aspects du prophétisme grec, in: Prophéties et oracles, II, en Égypte et en Grèce, Supplément Cahiers Évangile, 89, Paris: Éd. du Cerf 1994, p. 41-78. (B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 128, B 129 B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.)

– Les philosophes préclassiques. Ἀπορία, εὐπορία et les mots étymologiquement apparentés, in : Aporia dans la philosophie grecque, des origines à Aristote. Travaux du Centre d’études aristotéliciennes de l’Université de Liège, ed. André Motte & Christian Rutten (ed.), Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters 2001, (Aristote, traductions et études), p. 13-35. (B 3, B 100, B 137.)