᾿Εμπεδοκλῆς
Empedocles - Empedocle - Empédocle - Empedokles - Empedoklés - Empédocles - Эмпедокл - Empedoklész - エンペドクレス- Empedoklo - Empedioklis - אמפדוקלס - إمبيدوكليس
Bibliographie présentée par Tomáš Vítek et J.-C. Picot
Le site empedocles.acragas (https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/), créé en 2007, a pour objectif de contribuer à la promotion des études empédocléennes.
La constitution d’une bibliographie la plus complète possible contribue à cet objectif. La mise à jour sur trois pages différentes (Bibliography 1500-1804, Bibliography A-Z, Bibliography A-Z supplement) est faite régulièrement.
Nous présentons ici sur une seule page l’assemblage de ces trois bibliographies à la date du 12 février 2025.
Par respect pour le travail de T. Vítek, qui utilise B pour fragment (comme le fait Diels à partir de 1906), je prolonge ici cette écriture, bien que j’y voie une possibilité de confusion entre le(s) contexte(s) de citation(s) et le seul fragment édité par Diels.
Entre crochets droits, après les références bibliographiques, sont mentionnés les témoignages A et les fragments B que j’ai pu relever dans ladite référence.
Certains livres rapportent de façon systématique un grand nombre de fragments et/ou de témoignages. C’est le cas des éditions ou des recueils de traductions. Dans ce cas, j’ajoute : [ + ]. Certains de ces livres rapportent en plus des commentaires ou des notes pour tout ou partie des fragments et/ou des témoignages. Dans ce cas j’ajoute : [+ +].
Mise à jour au 12 février 2025.
Jean-Claude Picot
AA
Abt, Adam, Die Apologie des Apuleius von Madaura und die Antike Zauberai, Giessen: Töpelmann 1908.
[P. 112-115; B 111.1: φάρμακα.]
Acevedo, Angel Eduardo Juan, The idea of Στοιχεῖον in grammar and cosmology: From Antique roots to medieval systems, Diss. The Warburg Institute, University of London, 2018.
– Alphanumeric cosmology from Greek into Arabic: The idea of stoicheia through the Medieval Mediterranean, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2020.
Acri, Francesco, “Dei sistemi di Empedocle e Democrito,” Rivista sicula di scienze, letteratura ed arti, 2, 4, 1870, p. 408-421.
[P. 408-411. General outline of the principal theses of Emp. doctrine; a detailed idea of the author is the roots being composed of small divisible parts, which are able to penetrate the pores of each element during the maximal dominance of Strife.]
Adam, James, The religious teachers of Greece: Gifford lectures delivered at Aberdeen University, 1904-1906, Aberdeen 1908.
[P. 244-253; B 17, B 21, B 26, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 59, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 133, B 134.]
Adamson, Peter, S., The Arabic Plotinus: a study of the "Theology of Aristotle" and related texts, diss., University of Notre Dame, 2000.
[B 115.]
– The Arabic Plotinus: a philosophical study of the "Theology of Aristotle", London: Duckworth 2002.
[A dissertation in 2000. Review of G. Stamatellos in Ancient Philosophy, 26, 2006, p. 472-475. B 115.]
Ademollo, Francesco, The Cratylus of Plato: a commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011.
[B 9.]
Adluri, Vishwa, Parmenides, Plato, and mortal philosophy: Return from transcendence, London-New York: Continuum 2011.
[Two-soul theory: Thumos versus Psukhe, Gomperz.]
Afonasina, Anna S. [АФОНАСИНА, Анна, Сергеевна], (2012) “The birth of harmony out of the spirit of tekhe,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 6, 1, 2012, p. 68-75.
https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/6/6-1-af-tekh-en.pdf
[Empedocles connects harmonia with Aphrodite – one of the creative powers. It was important for him to represent the multifaceted character of harmonia by means of different crafts. In his philosophical views we can clearly see the process of development of the term of harmonia from its technical to abstract meaning.]
– (2015) “Эмпедокл о дыхании,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 9, 2, 2015, p. 353-362.
https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/9/9-2-afonasina.pdf
[In Fr. B 100 DK Empedocles famously compares the principle of breathing with this of clepsydra. This simile provoked a scholarly controversy. This article is the first part of the future analysis of Empedocles’ views on physical mechanisms of living beings and their sense perceptions.]
– (2016) “Страсбургский папирус Эмпедокла. О реконструкции текста и задачах на будущее,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 10, 1, 2016, p. 214-226. (The Strasbourg papyrus of Empedocles. A note on its reconstruction and future tasks for studies).
http://www.nsu.ru/classics/schole/10/schole-10-1.pdf
– (2018) “Эмпедокл в диалогах платона. свидетельства и преемственность идей,” Intellectual traditions in past and present, 4, 2018, p. 197-208.
[Intellectual traditions in past and present = Интеллектуальные традиции в прошлом и настоящем (исследо- вания и переводы). Empedocles in Plato’s dialogs. Evidences and the continuity of ideas; B 29, B 73, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 96.]
https://www.plato.spbu.ru/CONFERENCES/2018/ther164.html
http://roii.ru/intellectual-tradition/intellectual-tradition-4.pdf
– (2019) “Фрагмент В 17 Эмпедокла (перевод и комментарий),” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 13, 1, 2019, p. 375-381.
https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/schole-13-1.pdf https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/13-1-afonasina.pdf
[A new commented translation into Russian of Empedocles’ fragment B17 with the addition of several new lines available in the Strasbourg papyrus.]
– (2019) “Фрагмент В 17 Эмпедокла (продолжение) + собрание с страсбургского папируса (= В 20) (перевод и комментарий),” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 13, 2, 2019, p. 755-763.
https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/13-2-afonasina.pdf
– (2020) “Источники для образа Афродиты у Эмпедокла [Sources of the image of Aphrodite in Empedocles],” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 14, 1, 2020, p. 293-308
https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/14/schole-14-1.pdf
– (2020) “Страсбургский папирус Эмпедокла (окончание) перевод и комментарий,” ΣΧΟΛΗ,14, 2, 2020, p. 812-825.
https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/14/14-2-afonasina.pdf
– (2021) Страсбургский папирус Эмпедокла. The Strasbourg papyrus of Empedocles: A translation into Russian and commentary by A. A., ΣΧΟΛΗ Supplements, III, Novosibirsk 2021.
– (2022) “The image of Empedocles in the Hippocratic treatises and the interpretation of some biographical evidences.” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38, 3, 2022, p. 293-306. (In Russian. “Образ Эмпедокла в трактатах гиппократовского корпуса и интерпретация некоторых биографических сведений,” Вестник СПбГУ. Философия и конфликтология. 2022. Т. 38. Вып. 3, p. 293-306.)
https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/issue/view/755
https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/12911/9878
https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/download/12911/9878
[B 17, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 136, B 137.]
– (2023) “Загадочные тонкие полотна: Эмпедокл о зрении,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 17, 2, 2023, p. 1098-1108.
[“Mysterious filmy veils: Empedocles on vision”. B 84, B 87. The author does not take into account O. Primavesi, Empedokles’ Theorie der Augenfunktion und der Text des Laternengleichnisses, 2022.]
– (2023) “Как Эмпедокл становится платоником: Симпликий, «Комментарий на Физику», 157.25–161.20,” in: Платоновские исследования, 18.1, 2023, p. 115-133. (On-line.)
– (2024) “Simplicius on Empedocles. A note on his commentary in Phys 157.25-161.20,” ШАГИ / Steps, 10, 2, 2024, p. 183-196.
– (2024) “The image of Aphrodite in Empedocles,” Dia-noesis, 16, 2024, p. 153-169.
[B 17, B 18, B 22, B 35, B 73, B 75, B 86, B 87, B 96, B 98, B 128.]
Agnello, Nino, Empedocles: Frammenti, traduzione et commento, Cosenza: L. Pellegrini, 2008, (Filosofia teoretica, 6).
[Agnello follows B. Inwood’s edition. [+ +].]
Albinus, Lars, “The Greek δαίμων between Mythos and Logos,” in: Die Dämonen – Demons. Die Dämonologie der israelitisch-jüdischen und frühchristlichen Literatur im Kontext ihrer Umwelt, ed. A. Lange, H. Lichtenberger & K. F. D. Römheld, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2003, p. 425-446.
[Empedocles: p. 431-433, B 115, B112.]
Alearius, G. Ph. [perhaps Aleandro, Girolamo], Programma de morte Empedocles, Leipzig 1733.
[non vidi; adopted from a suspect source.]
Alesse, Francesca, “L’Empedocle di Renato Laurenti,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 291-304.
Alessio, Felice, “Empedocle,” La Rassegna Nazionale, 9, 35 (16. maggio, Firenze), 1887, p. 308-355.
[A popular sketch of Emp. teaching.]
Alexander, Thomas M., Aristotle’s dialectical criticism of Empedocles’ concept of animate being, Master Thesis, Emory University, 1976.
– “The Sphairos God in Empedocles’ Two Poems,” Southwest Philosophical Studies, X, 1, 1985, p. 84-95.
[B 27, B 29, B 98, B 105, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 134, B 146, in favor of daimôn = piece of Love, discussion of Cornford and Kahn’s views about the daimôn.]
Algra, Keimpe - Mansfeld, Jaap, “Three thêtas in the ‘Empédocle de Strasbourg’,” Mnemosyne, 54, 2001, p. 78-84.
[B 20, B 26, a(i) 6, a(ii) 17, c 3, d 5-6.]
Allison, June W., “Antithesis and the One/Many in Aeschylus’ Septem,” Mnemosyne, 66, 2013, p. 566-592.
[B 17, B 22, B 27, B 30, B 35.6, B 59, B 96, B 109, B 134, a MP.]
Almqvist, Olaf, Chaos, cosmos and creation in early Greek theogonies: an ontological exploration, London-New York: Bloomsbury Academic 2022, (Classical literature and society).
[B 21, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 115, B 128, B 130, B 137, B 139.]
Alt, Karin, “Einige Fragen zu den ‘Katharmoi’ des Empedokles,” Hermes, 115, 1987, p. 385-411; and Hermes, 116, 1988, p. 264-271.
[B 115.]
Altheim, Franz - Stiehl, Ruth, Porphyrios und Empedokles, Tübingen: Niemeyer 1954.
– “New fragments of Greek Philosophers I: Empedocles, Democritus, Theophrastus in Arabic Translation,” East and West, 12, 1, 1961, p. 3-18.
Althoff, Jochen, “Presocratic discourse in poetry and prose: The case of Empedocles and Anaxagoras,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43, 2, 2012, p. 293-299.
[B 6, B 8, B 11.]
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368111001270
Alvarez, Joel, “Empedocles’s ethics on the daimones and their purification,” in: Empedocles in Sicily, ed. Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Jennifer Ferriss-Hill & Heather L. Reid, Siracusa (Sicily)-Dakota Dunes (SD): Parnassos Press 2024, (The Heritage of Western Greece, 12), p. 79-95.
[B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 115, B 117, B 136, B 137, B 146, B 147.]
Amato, Eugenio, “Un discorso inedito di Procopio di Gaza: In Meletis et Antoninae Nuptias,” Revue des études tardo-antiques, 1, 2011-2012, p. 15-69.
[P. 48-56 - B 17, B 26, B 51, B 154, Papyrus Strasbourg.]
http://www.revue-etudes-tardo-antiques.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ret1amato.pdf
Ambrosano, Giovanna, “Cosmologia e daimonologia in Empedocle,” Incidenza dell'antico. Dialoghi di storia greca, 9, 2011, p. 101-121.
– “La respirazione empedoclea,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 6-38.
[Released in October 2014. B 100.]
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/filosofiaclassica/article/view/594/1289
– “La relazione tra sensi e nous in Empedocle,” La parola del passato, 70, 1, 2015, p. 63-90.
Amyot, Jacques, Les œuvres morales & meslees de Plutarque, translatees du Grec en François par Messire Jacques Amyot, à present Evesque d’Auxerre, conseiller du Roy en son privé Conseil, & grand Aumosnier dc France, Paris : Michel de Vascosan 1572.
[B 115: p. 129 verso.]
– See Plutarque, by E. Clavier.
Andò, Valeria, “Nestis o l’elemento acqua in Empedocle,” Kokalos, 28-29, 1982-3, p. 31-51.
[B 6, B 96.]
Andolfi, Ilaria, (2020) “Empedocles arbiter symposii: luxury, political equality, and bizarre dinner parties in fifth-century Acragas,” Histos, 14, 2020, p. 206-230.
[A 1.]
– (2021) “Designing a cosmic architecture: Craftsmanship in Empedocles’ poetry,” in: Teaching through images: Imagery in Greco-Roman didactic poetry, ed. J. Strauss Clay & A. Vergados, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2021, (Mnemosyne, Supplements, 450), p. 63-81.
[B 34, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 86, B 87, B 93, B 95, B 96, B 98.]
– (2022) “A grammar of self-referential statements: claims for authority from Hesiod to the Presocratics,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 117-136.
[B 3, B 21, B 23, B 77, B 112, B 129.]
– (2022) “Doric features in Empedocles’ poetry,” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale, 64, 2, 2022, p. 347-358.
[B 17, B 20, B 22, B 35, B 128, a(ii) 26-27.]
– (2024) “Equivocal and deceitful didactic poetry. What style matters can say about Empedocles’ audience(s),” Archai, 34, 2024, p. 1-27 (SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online). (A 1, A 22, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 17, B 35, B 42, B 68, B 84, B 100, B 111, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 124, B 127, B 136, B 139.)
Andreus, H[ans?], Empedocles, de ander, Gravenhage: Stols 1955.
Andriopoulos, Démétrios Z., “Empedocles’ theory of perception,” Platon, 24, 1972, p. 290-298.
Angiò, Francesca., “Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle (1999) and A. Martin & O. Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (1999),” Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft, 3, 2000, p. 1039-1041.
– “Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle (1999),” Quaderni di storia, 52, 2000, p. 301-304.
– “Empedocle, P.Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666, b3: una proposta di integrazione,” in: Πολυμάθεια. Studi Classici offerti a Mario Capasso, ed. P. Davoli & N. Pellé, Lecce - Bescia: Pensa Multimedia 2018, p. 121-123.
Anonymus, “Über die Bergdurchstechung des Empedokles in Akragas,” Beilage zur Augsburger allgemeinen Zeitung, 319 (15. Nov.], 1881, p. 4691-2.
Anonymus, “Empedocles,” The North British Review, 45/6, 1866, p. 420-440. Also “Art.VI.- Empedocles,” The North British Review, American edition, 45, December n° 90, 1866, p. 221-231.
[B 2, B 6, B 27, B 31, B 35, B 38, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 141, B 146, B 147. Epithets, metaphors. Apollo.]
Anonymus, I frammenti di Empedocle, Napoli: Stabilimento Industrie Editoriale Meridionali 1935.
Apelt, Ernst Friedrich, Parmenidis et Empedoclis doctrina de mundi structura, diss., Ienae: Sumptibus F. Maukii1857, p. 10-14.
Aquiliani, Scipione, Scipionis Aquiliani Pisani De Placitis Philosophorum, qui ante Aristotelis tempora floruerunt, Ad Principia Rerum Naturalium, & causas motuum assignandas pertinentibus, Venice: Giovanni Guerigli (Ioannem Guerilium) 1620. Reprint in same place: 1621. Reprint: Leipzig 1756.
[Emp. Cap. XXII (p. 102): Quot & quæ fuerint Empedocli principia rerum; Cap. XXIII (p. 111): Quæ Empedocles de ijsdem principijs dixerit; Cap. XXIV (p. 121): Quæ iuxta Empedoclis opinionem de generatione & corruptione alijsque motus speciebus dicenda videantur.]
Arata, Luigi, “Sul frammento 100 D.-K. di Empedocle,” Studi classici e orientali, 45, 1997, p. 65-84.
[B 100.]
Arena, Renato, “Ἀμόρβος, ἀμορβεῖν,” Rendiconti (Lett., Istituto Lombardo), 111, 1977, p. 285-302.
[Useful for B 84.3.]
Arieti, James, A., “Empedocles in Rome: Rape and the Roman ethos,” Clio, 10, 1, 1980, p. 5-20.
Arcellashi, André, “Empedoclea - Terentia ou la ruelle de la rhétorique,” Helmantica, 50, 1999, p. 45-55.
Armstrong, David & Ponczoch Joseph A., “[Philodemus] On Wealth (PHerc. 1570 Cols. VI-XX, Pcc. 4-6a): New fragments of Empedocles, Menander, and Epicurus,” Cronache Ercolanesi. Bollettino del Centro Internazionale per lo Studio dei Papiri Ercolanesi, 2011, 41, p. 97-138.
– “Empedocles and Philodemus in PHerc. 1570, col. VI 9-19,” Cronache Ercolanesi, 43, 2013, p. 113-116.
Aronadio, Francesco & Erminia Di Iulio & Francesca Masi (ed.), La natura corporea delle immagini, da Empedocle a Lucrezio, Naples: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici Press, 2022, (Dynamis. Il pensiero antico e la sua tradizione: studi e testi, 6).
[A 86, A 92, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 84, B 89, B 106, B 108, B 109, B 110.]
Arseniev, Arseni, “Empedocles - philosophical and medical views,” Asklepios, II (XXI), 2008, p. 77-82.
Arundel, Maureen Rosemary (= M. R. Wright), “Empedocles fr. 35.12-15,” The Classical Review, 12, 2, 1962, p. 109-111.
[B 35.]
– An Interpretation of Empedocles, diss., University of Oxford 1963.
– “'Principio Caelum' (Aeneid VI. 724-751),” Proceedings of the Virgil Society, 3, 1963-1964, p. 27-34.
[B 38.4., B 134.]
http://virgil.vacau.com/?page_id=260 http://virgil.vacau.com/pvs/1963/full.pdf?
Asheri, David, “Agrigenti libera: Rivolgimenti interni e problemi constituzionali ca. 471 - 446 a. C.,” Athenaeum, 68, 1990, p. 482-501.
Ashton, Susannah, (Francesca, Alicia), “Chance, relativity, and Empedocles’ cycle(s) of time,” in: Conceptions of time in Greek and Roman Antiquity, ed. R. Faure, S.-P. Valli & A. Zucker, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2022, p. 49-77.
[Concept of time. Fixed timetables vs lack of uniformity. Biological cycle of living beings. Love, Strife, and the four rhizomes. Sun, slow moving sun. A 70, A 81, B 30, B 31, B 62 (κρινόμενον πῦρ in B62 is likely a reference to the sun), scholia Aristotle.]
– Contesting chronos: an exploration of competing ontologies of time in early Greek thought, Diss. University of Dublin, Trinity College, 2022.
Asín Palacios, Miguel, The mystical philosophy of Ibn Masarra and his followers, translated by E. H. Douglas and H. W. Yoder, first published as Abenmasarra y su escuela, Orígenes de la filosofía hispaño-musulmana, Madrid, 1914, Leiden: Brill 1978.
[P. 43-72: Pseudo-Empedoclean doctrine of Ibn Masarra, Historical criticism of the Pseudo-Empedoclean system.]
Atanasijevič, Ksenija, “Empedokle iz Agrigenta,” Misao, 7/131-2, 1925, p. 699-702 and 891-905.
– “Empedoklovi religijski fragmenti,” in: Kalendar Vreme (Beograd 1925), p. 64-65.
Athanassakis, Apostolos, N. & Benjamin, M. Wolkow, The Orphic Hymns, translation, introduction, and notes by A. N. A. & B. M. W., Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press 2013.
[Emp. on Ether, Fates, Moon, Hephaistos, Fire, Sun.]
Attilio Piovano, G., “Review of Ettore Bignone. I poeti filosofi della Grecia, Empedocle, 1916,” Athenaeum, 6, 1918, p. 76-82.
Aubin, Nicholas, “Natural teleology versus material determinism and chance: Al-'Āmirī against Empedocles and Galen on nature and soul,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 59, 3, 2021, p. 429-456.
[Anbāduqlīs. Empedocles arabus. Cf. De Smet.]
Aubry, Gwenaëlle, “Démon et intériorité d’Homère à Plotin : esquisse d’une histoire,” in: Le moi et l’intériorité, G. Aubry & F. Ildefonse, Paris: J. Vrin 2008, p. 255-268.
[Emp.: p. 259-260.]
Audié, Prudence, “Empedokles in Nietzsches Dramenentwürfen,” Nietzsche-Studien, 53, 2024. Published online Juli 23, 2024, p. 1-16.
– “Entre matérialité et divinité: les métamorphoses du concept d’« élément »,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica 35, 2024. p. 70-81.
[In an issue the title of which is Filosofia Clássica e Matemática. Hölderlin. Nietzsche. Atomism. A 43, B 6, B 9, B 17, B 29, B 38, B 134.]
Aulotte, Robert, Amyot et Plutarque : la tradition des « Moralia » au XVIe siècle, Genève : Droz 1965.
Avanesov, Sergey, (Аванесов, С. С.), “Эмпедокл: божественность и самоубийство,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 1, 2, 2007, p. 147-171.
[A 16, B 3, B 114, B 115, B 126, B 127, B 129, B 120, B 146.]
Azevedo, Cristiane A. de, “Uma questão de saber: thymós e nóos em Parmênides e Empédocles,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 63-77.
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/353/546
– “Parmênides e Empédocles: entre as sensações e o intelecto,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 10, 19, 2016,
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/5071/4024
Babich, Babette, “Le Zarathoustra de Nietzsche et le style parodique. À propos de l’Hyperanthropos de Lucien et du surhomme de Nietzsche,” Diogène, 232, 2010, p. 81-104.
– “The philosopher and the volcano. On the antique sources of Nietzsche’s Übermensch,” Philosophy today, Supplement 2011, p. 206-224.
[B 27, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 140.]
– “Nietzsche’s Zarathustra and parodic style: On Lucian’s Hyperanthropos and Nietzsche’s Übermensch,” Diogenes, 58, 4, 2012, p. 58-74.
– “Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, Nietzsche’s Empedocles: the time of kings,” in: Nietzsche’s therapeutic teaching. For individuals and culture, ed. H. Hutter & E. Friedland, London: Bloomsbury 2013, (Bloomsbury Studies in Continental Philosophy), p. 157-174
– “Becoming and purification: Empedocles, Zarathustra’s Übermensch, and Lucian’s Tyrant,” Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections, 61, 2014.
https://research.library.fordham.edu/phil_babich/61
Babut, Daniel, La religion des philosophes grecs : de Thalès aux Stoïciens, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1974, (Collection SUP, Littératures anciennes, 4), p. 34-42.
– “Sur l’unité de la pensée d’Empédocle,” Philologus, 120, 1976, p. 139-164.
[B 21, B 115, B 116, B 118, B 120, B 126, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 146, B 147, B 148.]
Bacigalupo, Maria Vittoria, “Teriomorfismo e trasmigrazione,” Filosofia, rivista trimestrale (Torino), 16.2, 1965, p. 267-290.
[Emp.: p. 278-280.]
Bachelard, Gaston, La psychanalyse du feu, Paris: Gallimard 1949.
[Emp., p. 31-40, 'Le complexe d’Empédocle'.]
Bader, Françoise, “Autour de Polyphème le Cyclope à l’œil brillant : diathèse et vision,” Die Sprache, 30, 2, 1984, p. 109-137.
[B 84.]
– “Introduction à l’étude des mythes indo-européens de la vision : les Cyclopes,” in : Studi indoeuropei, ed. E. Campanile, Pisa: Giardini 1985, (Testi linguistici, 8), p. 9-50.
[B 84.]
– “De Pollux ä Deukalion: la racine *deu-k- "briller, voir",” in: O-o-pe-ro-si: Festschrift für Ernst Risch zum 75. Geburtstag, ed. A. Etter, Berlin-New York: W. de Gruyter 1986, p. 463-488.
Bader, Nico & Marie-Anne de Roode, Pythagoras Foundation Newsletter, 28, March 2023. http://www.stichting-pythagoras.nl/
– Pythagoras Foundation Newsletter, 29, March 2024.
On-line: https://stichting-pythagoras.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/NEWSLETTER-N29-FINAL.pdf
Baeumker, Clemens, Das Problem der Materie in der griechischen Philosophie, Münster: Aschendorff 1890.
[Emp.: p. 67-72.]
Badolati, Giuseppe S., “Empedocle di Agrigento: l’uomo, il medico, l’ambiente,” in: Index Empedocleus, Genova 1991, I.37-48.
Baestlein, Albert, “Quid Lucretius debuerit Empedocli Agrigentino,” in: Jahresbericht des Königlichen Preussischen Hennebergischen Gymnasiums zu Schleusingen, Meiningen: Druck der Keyssner’schen Hofbuchdruckerei 1875, p. 1-21.
[Printed also under the title Quid debeat Lucretius Empedocli Agrigentino.]
Baffioni, Carmela, “Una storia della filosofia greca nell’Islam del XII. secolo (Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Karím aš-Šahrastání), II: Anassagora ed Empedocle,” Elenchos, 3, 1982, p. 87-107 (Roma 1983).
Bailey D. M., A catalogue of the lamps in the British Museum, 1, Greek, Hellenistic, and early Roman pottery lamps, London: British Museum Publications 1975.
[Useful for B 84. P. 225-227, 294-299, plate 98, Q 495, Q 496.]
Bailly, Anatole, Dictionnaire Grec-Français, Paris: Hachette 1935.
Baird, Forrest, E., Philosophic classics, sixth edition volume I, Ancient philosophy, London-New York: Routledge 2016.
Bakhouche, Béatrice, “Les citations d’Empédocle chez Calcidius,” Ítaca : quaderns catalans de cultura clàssica, 28-29, 2013, p. 45-62. Online:
https://publicacions.iec.cat/repository/pdf/00000199%5C00000005.pdf
[γόμφοι. B 105, B 109, B 115.5, B 117, B 121, B 136, B 137.]
– “Quelques remarques sur les présocratiques à Rome : la figure d’Empédocle de Cicéron à Saint Augustin,” Revue des Études Tardo-antiques, IV, 3, 2014, p. 53-71.
– “Empedocles latinus : citations et traductions latines de fragments empédocléens,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 56-67. Released in October 2014.
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1453/1294
[B 90, B 105, B 109, B 117, B 121.]
Bakhuizen van den Brink, Regnerus Cornelius (Reinier Cornelis), Disputatio literaria inauguralis continens varias lectiones ex historia philosophiae antiquae etc., H. W. Hazenberg, Lugduni-Batavorum, 1842.
[P. 31-35. B 115.6.]
Bakker, C., “Iets over den invloed van Empedokles en Aristoteles op de geneeskunde en de magie bij de oude Grieken en Romeinen,” Bijdragen tot de Geschiedenis der Geneeskunde = Uitgave van het Nederlandisch Tijdschrift voor Genneskunde, 10, 1930, p. 29-44.
[A 145.]
Balaudé, Jean-François, (1992) Le démon et la communauté des vivants. Étude de la tradition d’interprétation antique des Catharmes d’Empédocle, de Platon à Porphyre, diss., Lille III 1992.
[B 115, B 117, B 122, B 123.]
– (1997) “Parenté du vivant et végétarisme radical : le ‘défi’ d’Empédocle,” in: L’Animal dans l’antiquité, ed. B. Cassin - J.-L. Labarrière, dir. G. Romeyer-Dherbey, Paris: J. Vrin 1997, p. 31-53.
[B 2, B 16, B 22, B 115, B 117, B 124, B 135, B 136.]
– (1999) “[Notes de la Vie d’] Empédocle,” in: Diogène Laërce. Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres, Paris: Le Livre de Poche 1999, (Classiques modernes. La Pochothèque), p. 980-1002, 1022-1023.
[A 1.]
– (2002) Le Vocabulaire des Présocratiques, Paris: Ellipses 2002.
[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 23, B 27, B 35, B 89, B 114, B 115, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 139.]
– (2005) “Empédocle d’Agrigente,” in: Le Dictionnaire de l’Antiquité, ed. Jean Leclant, Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France 2005, p. 785-789.
[A general sketch of Emp. teaching which is based on J. Bollack’s theories from Sixties.]
– (2010) Le savoir-vivre philosophique : Empédocle, Socrate, Platon, Paris: Grasset & Fasquelle 2010, (Le collège de philosophie).
[Emp.: p. 87-128. Chap. 4. La réflexion éthique avant Socrate : les Catharmes d’Empédocle, (a) les deux poèmes et le papyrus de Strasbourg (p. 87-91), (b) les démons, et leurs significations (p. 92-104). – Chap. 5. Refonder la communauté humaine : le végétarisme radical d’Empédocle (p. 105-128: a reprint of “Parenté du vivant et végétarisme radical: le “défi” d’Empédocle,” with little modifications or improvements). B 2, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 122, B 123, B 127, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 151.]
– (2010) France Culture – Les nouveaux chemins de la connaissance : Préhistoires de la pensée 3/5 : Empédocle (10-11-2010).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPLmHJrymhI
Baldry, H.C., “Embryological analogies in pre-socratic cosmogony,” Classical Quarterly, 26, 1, 1932, p. 27-34.
– “Who invented the golden age?” The Classical Quarterly, New Series, 2, 1/2, 1952, p. 83-92.
[B 128.]
Ball, Philip, The elements: A very short introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, (Very short introductions).
– The elements: A visual history of their discovery, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2021.
Baloyannis, Stavros, J., “Empedocles: Neurophilosophy and neurosciences- prophecy and reality,” Journal of neurology & Stroke, 1, 6, 2014, 00037. p. 1-5.
http://medcraveonline.com/JNSK/JNSK-01-00037.php
– “Empedocles and Neurosciences,” Encephalos, 51, 2014, p. 66-78.
http://www.encephalos.gr/pdf/51-4-01e.pdf
Baltussen, Han, (2006) “An Empedoclean ‘Hearing aid’? Fragment B 99 revisited,” Méthexis, 19, 2006.
[B 99.]
– (2008) Philosophy and exegesis in Simplicius: The methodology of a commentator, London: Duckworth 2008.
[London-New Delhi-New York-Sydney: Bloomsbury 2008. Chap. 2.2.2 Emp.: p. 74-78, 165. B 17, B 21, B 22, B 24, B 109, B 115, B 134.]
– (2015) “Simplicius on elements and causes in Greek philosophy: critical appraisal or philosophical synthesis?,” in: Causation and creation in late Antiquity, ed. A. Marmodoro & B. P. Prince, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, p. 111-128.
[B 6.]
– (2019) “Theophrastus’ De sensibus in the A-fragments of Diels-Kranz. Revisiting the Testimonia and their Value,” Rhizomata, 7, 2, 2019, (Special Issue: Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus), p. 120-145.
Baltussen, Han, M. Share, M. Atkinson & I. Mueller, Simplicius. On Aristotle, Physics 1.5-9, translated by B. H et al., with an Introduction by R. Sorabji, London-New Delhi - New York - Sydney: Bloomsbury 2012, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle).
[Simplicius p. 179.20 - 257.30; B 8, B 17.]
Baltzer, Eduard, “Empedokles, eine Studie,” Athenaeum, 2-4, 1876, p. 159-165 and 203-207.
– Empedocles, eine Studie zur Philosophie der Griechen, Leipzig: Oscar Eigendorf 1879.
[More or less the reprint of the previous article plus a translation of the B fragments. [+ +].]
Βαμβακάς, Κ., Οι θεμελιωτές της δυτικής σκέψης : ένας διαχρονικός παραλληλισμός μεταξύ προσωκρατικού στοχασμού, φιλοσοφίας και φυσικής επιστήμης, Ηράκλειο : Πανεπιστημιακές εκδόσεις Κρήτης, 2001.
[P. 341-409 (Εμπεδοκλής).]
Barbanti, Maria, “Empedocle in Plotino e in Porfirio,” Giornale di metafisica, 21, 1999, p. 217-233.
[B 105, B 115, B 120, B 126, B 128, B 129, B 139.]
Barbato, Angelo, (trans.), Plutarchi Chaeronei De Exilio libellus Angelo Barbato interprete, Roma: Giacomo Mazzochi 1516. Reprint in: Plutarchi Chaeronei De exilio libellus nuper latine factus, Angelo Barbato interprete. Muscae encomium Luciani, latinum factum Nicolao Beraldo interprete. Scipionis Carteromachi Pistoriensis Oratio de laudibus literarum græcarum, ed. Rémy Roussel, Paris: Les Frères de Gourmont 1517. Several others reprints in XVth.
[B 115.]
Barberius, Iosephus, “D. Josephi Barberii De miseria poetarum Graecarum liber,” in: Thesaurus Graecarum antiquitatum, Volumen decimum, Lugduni Batavorum 1701, p. 814-851. (Emp.: p. 822-3: very superficial biography of Emp. plus some enumeration of sources.]
Bargrave-Weaver, D., “The Cosmogony of Anaxagoras,” Phronesis, 4, 2, 1959, p. 77-91.
[B 38, fire, air, ether.]
Barker, Andrew, “Empedocles Mousikos,” in: Musica, culti e riti nell’Occidente greco, ed. A. Bellia, Pisa - Roma: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali 2014, p. 87-94.
[B 17.]
Barnes, Hazel Estella., “Unity in the thought of Empedocles,” The Classical Journal, 63, 1967, p. 18-23.
Barnes, Jonathan, (1979) The Presocratic philosophers, Volume 2, Empedocles to Democritus, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1979, (The arguments of the philosophers).
[Emp.: p. 161-201. – Revised edition in one volume in 1982, Emp.: p. 308-317, p. 418-423, p. 477-504, p. 536-538. An extensive translation of B fragments and their contexts. Reprint in London-New York: Routledge 1999, 2000, 2001. [+ +].]
– (1982) “Review of Wright, Empedocles: The extant fragments, 1981,” The Classical Review, 32.2, 1982, p. 191-196.
[Important.]
– (1983) “Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Greece and Rome, 30, 1, 1983, p. 103.
– (1987) Early Greek philosophy, London: Penguin Books 1987, (Penguin Classics). Revised edition London: Penguin Books 2001.
[[ + ].]
– (1993) “Review of Index Empedocleus, 1991, by Imbraguglia, Badolati, Morchio, Battegazzore, Messina,” The Classical Review, 43.1, 1993, p. 165.
Baron, Christopher A., Timaeus of Tauromenium and hellenistic historiography, Cambridge - New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press 2013.
[Emp.: p. 164-169. B 129.]
Barros, Nayra, Sousa & Rafael, César Pitt, “A presença de elementos míticos na filosofia de Empédocles. Mythic elements in Empedocle’s philosophy,” Investigação Filosófica, 11, 1, 2020, p. 105-114.
https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/investigacaofilosofica/article/view/5575/pdf
Barrio Gutiérrez, José, Empédocles: Sobre la naturaleza de los seres. Las purificaciones, Buenos Aires: Aguilar 1964 (19813), (Biblioteca de iniciación filosófica, 90).
Bartolini Niccolini, Olga, “De T. Lucretio Caro,” Latinitas, 3, 1955, p. 280-286.
Bartoš, Hynek, “Nesmrtelná PSYCHÉ a putující DAIMÓN [The immortal Psyché and the wandering Daimón],” Reflexe, 29, 2005, p. 27-57.
https://www.reflexe.cz/Reflexe_29/Nesmrtelna_psyche_a_putujici_daimon.html#84
[Emp.: p. 43-56. A solid analysis of the Empedoclean conception of wandering “daimôn” and reincarnation on basis of the contemporary sources and theories; the text is written in Czech, summaries in English and German. B 59, B 115.]
– Philosophy and Dietetics in the Hippocratic On Regimen: a delicate balance of health, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2015, (Studies in ancient medicine, 44).
[B 8, B 17, plus p. 197-198, Jouanna.]
Bartoš, Hynek & Vojtěch Linka, Aristotle reads Hippocrates, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2024, (Studies in Ancient Medicine, 59).
Baskevitch, François, La théorie de l'audition chez Empédocle, Academia.edu 2012.
https://www.academia.edu/8108869/La_théorie_de_laudition_chez_Empédocle_et_les_présocratiques
[B 99.]
Battegazzore, Antonio Mario, “Il linguaggio di Empedocle,” in: Index Empedocleus, ed. G. Imbraguglia et al., Genova 1991, I.69-80.
– “La magia della parola in Empedocle e Gorgia,” Giornale di metafisica, 21, 1-2, 1999, p. 67-99.
Battistini, Yves, “Empédocle,” Revue Empédocle, 1, 1949, p. 55-60.
– “Les Purifications,” Revue Empédocle, 1, 1949, p. 61-66.
– “Empédocle d’Agrigente. De la nature, traduction par Yves Battistini,” Botteghe Oscure, Quaderno X, II semestre 1952, Roma: Arnaldo Mondadori, p. 7-31.
– Trois contemporains : Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle. Traduction nouvelle et intégrale avec notices par Y. B., Paris: Gallimard 1955, (Les Essais, 78). Corrected reeditions: Trois présocratiques: Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle, Paris: Gallimard 19681, (Idées); 19882, (Tel).
[Emp. in 1955, p. 115-191, plus “table de concordance entre fragments et sources, p. 199-202. In 1988², p. 141-235, plus p. 243-246. [+ +].]
– Empédocle, Légende et œuvre : Sur la nature, Purifications, Texte intégral, présentation, traduction et notes Y. B., Paris: Imprimerie nationale Éditions 1997, (La Salamandre).
[+ +].
Baumann, Hermann, Das doppelte Geschlecht. Ethnologische Studien zur Bisexualität in Ritus uns Mythos, Berlin: Dietrich Reimer 1955.
[P. 179-180 : influence of Empedoclean conception of bisexuality on Aristophanes’ mythus in Plato’s Symposion. P. 304-307 : Empedoclean theory about influence of left and right sides of body on generation.]
Bauer, Johannes Bapt., “'Μονίη' Empedokles B 27.4 und 28.3,” Hermes, 89, 1961, p. 361-369.
Baxter, Timothy M. S., The Cratylus: Plato’s critique of naming, Leyde: Brill 1992, p. 122-124.
[B 6.]
Beardslee Jr, John Walter, The use of ΦΥΣΙΣ in fifth-century Greek Literature, Diss. University of Chicago, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1918.
[B 8, B 63, B 110.]
Beare, John Isaac, Greek theories of elementary cognition: from Alcmaeon to Aristotle, Oxford 1906, p. 13-21 and 95-99.
[A 86.]
Becker, Otfrid, Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken, Berlin: Weidmann 1937, (Hermes Einzelschriften, 4).
[P. 147-150.]
Βέϊκος, Θ. [see also Veikos], Οι προσωκρατικοί, Αθήνα: Ελληνικά γράμματα 1998.
[P. 165-183: Εμπεδοκλής.]
Belloni, Luigi, “Aspetti dell'antica ΣΟΦΙΑ in Apollonio de Tiana,” Aevum, 54, 1, 1980, p. 140-149. (Vita e Pensiero).
Bénatouïl, Thomas, “Mouvements et vie chez Aristote : quelques remarques « autour » des plantes,” Anais de filosofia clássica, 13, 25, 2019, p. 1-20.
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/26083/15987
Benitez, Rick, “Plato and the secularisation of Greek theology,” in: Theologies of ancient Greek religion, ed. Kindt, J., Eidinow, E. & Osboclaudiarne, R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 301-316.
Benn Alfred, William, Early Greek philosophy, London: Constable 1914.
[Emp.: p. 57-64.]
Bennett, John, Empedocles the poet: His style and metre, diss., Trinity College, Dublin 1940.
Benson, J. L., Greek color theory and the four elements: a cosmological interpretation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Libraries, 2000.
http://scholarworks.umass.edu/art_jbgc/1/ http://www.library.umass.edu/benson/jbgcimages.html
[Emp.: p. 21-24, A 69a, A 86, A 92, B 21, B 94, B 67, B 71, B 23.]
Benzi, Nicolò, “Chapter 4: Empedocles, the divine poet,” in: Philosophy in verse: Competition and early Greek philosophical thought, Diss., Durham University, 2016, p. 121-154.
http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11568/
[B 17.]
– “The redefinition of poetic authority in early Greek philosophical poetry,” Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, 44, 2, 2018, p. 15-41.
[Emp.: p. 31-37. Muse. B 3, B 112, B 115, B 131.]
Bercovitch, Sacvan, “Empedocles in the English Renaissance,” Studies in Philology, 65, 1, 1968, p. 67-80.
Bergemann, Lutz, “Transformation und Konstruktion: Empedokles als 'religious atomist' und exemplum eines 'true system' of the universe,” in: Ralph Cudworth - System aus Transformation: zur Naturphilosophie der Cambridge Platonists und ihrer Methode, Berlin-Boston (Mass.): Walter de Gruyter 2012, p. 99-114.
Bergk, Theodor, (1835) “Schedae criticae. Fasciculus II,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 39, 1835, p. 313-320.
[P. 313 = B 17, p. 314 = B 123.]
– (1836) “De scolio Pindari in Xenophontem Corinthium dissertatio et coniecturae in poetas graecos,” in: Acta Societatis Graecae 1, Lipsiae 1836, p. 187-208.
[Emp.: p. 203-207. Reprint in De locis quibusdam Empedocleis, 1886. B 2, B 3, B 17, B 27, B 42, B 82, B 100, B112, B 136.]
– “(1837) Coniectanea non reiectanea,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 54-5, 1837, p. 447-452.
– (1839) “Commentatio de Prooemio Empedoclis,” in: Ankündigungschrift der am 28 September 1839 zu haltenden öffentlichen Prüfung sämmtlicher Classen des Königl. Joachimsthalschen Gymnasiums, Berlin: Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1839, p. 1-34. (= in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 8-43. [+ +].]
– (1842) “Review of Karsten’s Empedocles, 1838,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 97, 1842, October, p. 1001-1011. (= Kleine philologische Schriften, II, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle 1886, p. 45-59.]
– (1843) “Empedocles,” in: Poetae lyrici Graeci, Leipzig: Reichenbach 1843, chap. XVI, p. 431 (1853, Chap. 23, p. 468). (B 156, B 157.]
– (1844) “Commentationum criticarum specimen II,” in: Indices lectionum et publicarum et privatarum, quae in Academia Marburgensi per semestre hibernum anno 1844-5, Marburgi 1844, p. ii-iv (= Kleine philologische Schriften, II, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle 1886, p. 43-45).
– (1853)“Review of Stein,” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik, 68/23, 1853, p. 21-26. (= in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 59-66.)
[Emp.: p. 203-207. B 2, B 3, B 17, B 27, B 42, B 82, B 100, B112, B 136.]
– (1870) “Philologische Thesen, zweite Centurie, Schluss,” Philologus, 29, 1870, p. 319-330.
[P. 320]. (= Reprint in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, p. 738-760.]
[Item 60: B 98. Item 61: B 21.3-6.]
– (1886) “De locis quibusdam Empedocleis,” in: Kleine philologische Schriften, II, zur griechischen Literatur, ed. R. Peppmüller, Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses 1886, II, p. 3-7. (Previously published in “De scolio Pindari in Xenophontem Corinthium dissertatio et coniecturae in poetas graecos,” in: Acta Societatis Graecae 1, Lipsiae 1836, p. 187-208).
– (1888) Commentationum de reliquiis comoediae atticae antiquae, Lipsiae 1888.
[B 105, B 137 etc.]
Bernabé Pajares, Alberto, (1979) “Los filósofos presocráticos como autores literarios,” Emerita, 47, 1979, p. 357-394.
– (1997) “Lo uno y lo múltiple en la especulación presocrática: nociones, modelos y relaciones,” Taula, 27-28, 1997, p. 75-99.
– (1998) “Hom. ἀμφίβροτος y mic. a-pi-qo-to, ¿un caso de etimología popular?,” in: Corolla Complutensis. In memoriam J. S. Lasso de la Vega, ed. L. Gil et al., Madrid: Editorial Complutense 1998, p. 39-48.
[B 148.]
– (2000) “La física de Empédocles y Anaxágoras,” in: Ciencia y cultura en la grecia antigua, clásica y helenística,” in: Actas años vi y vii, Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia, 2000, p. 71-95.
http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/educacion/3/Usrn/fundoro/archivos%20adjuntos/publicaciones/actas/actas_6_7_pdf/Act.VI-VII_C004_txi_w.pdf
– (2001) De Tales a Demócrito. Fragmentos presocráticos. Introducción, traducción y notas de A.B., Madrid: Alianza Editorial 2001², (Biblioteca temática, 8241).
[Emp.:.p. 181-242, 327-340. First edition 1988. 3rd edition: 2008. [+ +].]
– (2002) “Orphisme et Présocratiques : bilan et perspectives d’un dialogue complexe,” in: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique ? What is presocratic philosophy?, ed. A. Laks & C. Louguet, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 205-247.
[B 6.]
– (2004) Textos órficos y filosofía presocrática: Materiales para una comparación. Madrid: Editorial Trotta 2004, (Estructuras y procesos, Filosofia).
– (2004) Poeta Epici Graeci, Testimonia et fragmenta, Pars II, Orphicorum et Ophicis Similium. Testimonia et Fragmenta, Fasc. I, Munich-Leipzig: Saur 2004.
[B 112, B 146-147, B 115, B 126, B 117, B 118, B 148.]
– (2013) “Eἶδος en los filósofos presocráticos,” in: Τη γλωσσα μου εδωσαν ελληνικη. Homenaje a la profesora Penélope Stavrianopulu, ed. F. García Romero et al., Berlin: Logos 2013, p. 91-104.
– (2013) Los filósofos presocráticos: literatura, lengua y visión del mundo, Madrid: Ediciones Evohé 2013.
[B 22, B 23, B 27, B 71, B 73, B 98, B 115, B 125.]
– (2019) “Vegetarianismo en la Grecia antigua,” Mare nostrum, 10, 1, 2019, p. 31-53.
http://www.revistas.usp.br/marenostrum
[B 115, B 117, B 136, B 137, B 139.]
– (2019) Fragmentos presocráticos. Edición bilingüe de los textos, selección de testimonios, introducciones y notas de A. B. Madrid: Abada Editores 2019.
[Emp.: p. 293-374. Based on Graham 2010 and Diels-Kranz. Published in 2019, but does not take into account new things after 2008. [+ +].]
– (2020) “¿A quiénes se refiere Heródoto 2.123?,” in: Deisidaimonía. Religiosidad y superstición en la Grecia Antigua. Homenaje al profesor Emilio Suárez de la Torre, ed. J.-M Nieto Ibáñez & Á. Ruiz Pérez, Bern: Peter Lang Publishing 2020, p. 309-331.
[B 115, B 117.]
Bernabé, Alberto & Jiménez San Cristóbal, Ana Isabel, Instrucciones para el más allá: las laminillas órficas de oro, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas 2001.
[P. 193-194: B6; p. 195: B25.]
– Instructions for the netherworld: the orphic gold tablets, translated by Michael Chase, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2008, (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World, 162).
[P. 16: B 129; p. 39: B 114, B 121; p. 65: B 115, B 132; p. 44, 84: B 119; p. 109: B 115; p. 118: B 17, B 26, B 35, B 38; p. 119: B 115; p. 145, 148, 149, 192, 193: B6; p. 146: B 22; p. 173: B 112.]
Bernardakis, Gregorius, N., Plutarchi Chaeronensis. Moralia, recognovit G. N. B., Vol. III, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1891.
[De exilio, B 115.]
Bernays, Jacob, Theophrastos' Schrift über Frömmigkeit. Ein Beitrag zur Religionsgeschichte, Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz 1866.
[B 128: p. 79-81, 95-96, 117-179.]
Bersano, Arturo, “Review of E. Bignone, I poeti della Grecia - Empedocle, 1916,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 44, 1916, p. 569-574,
Berti, Enrico, “Conclusioni,” Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, XXI, 1999, p. 243-250.
Bertini, Giovanni Maria, “Dottrine religiose di Empedocle,” Atti della reale Accademia delle scienze di Torino, 4, 1868-1869, p. 675-682.
[Superficial study dealing [a] on Love, B 132 - B 134, B 31: she should be the highest god of Empedocles’ system; [b] on transmigration, B 115, B 117, B 146: some unoriginal theses; [c] on the theory of cognition, B 2 - B 4: the senses are untrustworthy, the only one criterion of cognition is a reason; [d] Alleged eclecticism of Empedocles.]
– La filosofia greca prima di Socrate, esposizione storico-critica, Torino: Stamperia Reale 1869.
[Emp.: p. 233-256.]
Berve, Helmut & Gottfried Gruben, I templi greci, Florence: G. C. Sansoni 1962.
[B 6, Nestis, p. 248.]
Berz, Peter, “Respondenz zu Oliver Primavesi 'Tetraktys und Göttereid',” in: Götter und Schriften rund ums Mittelmeer, ed. Friedrich Kittler, Peter Berz, Joulia Strauss, Peter Weibel, zusammen mit Gerhard Scharbert, Parderborn: Wilhelm Fink 2017, p. 317-410.
Betegh, Gábor, (1999) “A strasbourgi Empedoklész-papirusz,” Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Filozófiai Bizottságának folyóirata, 6, 1999.
http://epa.oszk.hu/00100/00186/00005/996_betegh.html
– (2001) “Empédocle, Orphée et le papyrus de Derveni,” in: Les anciens savants: études sur les philosophies préplatoniciennes, réunies par Pierre-Marie Morel et Jean-François Pradeau, Strasbourg: Université Marc Bloch 2001, (Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, 12), p. 47-70.
[B 17, B 26, B 27, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 140, B 136, B 137, B 139, d MP.]
– (2004) The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
[P. 370-372: Empedocles and Orpheus; B 21, B 111, B 112, B 115.]
– (2006) “Eschatology and cosmology: models and problems,” in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici / The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa: Edizioni della Normale 2006, p. 27-50.
[P. 45-46: B 105, B 115.]
– (2020) “Fire, heat, and motive force in early Greek philosophy and medicine,” in: Heat, pneuma, and soul in ancient philosophy and science, ed. Hynek Bartoš & Colin Guthrie King, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2020, p. 35-60.
[Emp.: p. 41-43; A 37, A 70, B 62.]
– (2021) “Thinking with Empedocles: Aristotle on the soul as harmonia,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 59, 2021, p. 1-44.
[B 96.]
– (2021) “The ingredients of the soul in Plato’s Timaeus,” in: Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy: Keeling lectures 2011–18, ed. F. Leigh, London: University of London Press 2021, (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement 141), p. 83-103.
Betegh, Gábor & Pavel Gregorić, “God’s relation to the cosmos (Chapter 6),” in: Pseudo-Aristotle: De Mundo (On the Cosmos). A commentary, ed. Pavel G. & G. Karamanolis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020, p. 176-212.
[B 21.]
Bett, Richard, Arnot, (trans.), Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Translated and edited by R. B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005, (Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy).
[Adversus mathematicos, Book VII. 92, 115-116, 120-125. A 1.57, B 2, B 3, B 109, B 110.10.]
– (trans.), Sextus Empiricus. Against the Physicists. Translated and edited by R. B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
[Adversus mathematicos, Book IX, Part I: 10, 127-129, 362. Part 2: 315, 317. B 6, B 17.18-20, B 136, B 137. Conflates roots and elements.]
– (trans.), Sextus Empiricus. Against those in the disciplines, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018.
[Adversus mathematicos, Book I. 302, 303. B 109, B 112.4-5, B 113.]
Bianchi, Emanuela (ed.), Sara Brill (ed.) & Brooke Holmes (ed.), Antiquities beyond humanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019, (Classics in Theory).
[B 6, B 115, B 117.]
Bianchi, Ugo, “Péché originel et péché « antécédent »,” Revue de l’histoire des religions, 170, 2, 1966, p. 17-126.
– Selected essays on gnosticism, dualism and mysteriosophy, Leiden: E. J. Brill 1978, (Studies in the history of religions; 38).
[B 109, B 115, B 126.]
– “L’anima in Origene e la questione della metensomatosi,” Augustinianum, 26, 1/2, 1986, p. 33-50.
Bicknell, Peter James., “The Shape of the cosmos in Empedocles,” La Parola del Passato, 23, 1968, p. 118-119.
[A 501, A 47.]
Bidez, Joseph, La Biographie d’Empédocle, Gand: Clemm 1894. Reprint: Hildesheim - New York: Olms 1973.
– “Observations sur quelques fragments d’Empédocle et de Parménide,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 9, 1896, p. 190-207 (§ XIII), p. 298-309 (§ XVII).
[B 2, B 3, B 4, B 21, B 23, B 71, B 110, B 111.]
Bidez, Joseph & Cumont, Franz, Les Mages hellénisés. Zoroastre, Ostanès et Hystaspe d’après la tradition grecque, Tome I- Introduction, Tome II- Les Textes, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1938. Reprint in a single volume in 2007, by Les Belles Lettres, (Collection d’études anciennes, 134, série grecque).
[A 145, 7-8. P. 238-240.]
Biedrzyński, Dawid, “Pojęcie harmonii w filozofii empedoklesa,” IDEA – Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych, 26, 2014, p. 5-18,
https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.desklight-53681f6b-b3b6-449f-8aea-195bff1b9552
Bierl, Anton, “'Riddles over riddles', 'mysterious' and 'symbolic' (inter)textual strategies, the problem of language in the Derveni Papyrus,” in: Poetry as initiation - The Center for Hellenic studies symposium on the Derveni Papyrus, ed. I. Papadopoulou & L. Muellner, Cambridge (Ma)-London: Harvard University Press, 2014, p. 187-210.
Biès, Jean, “Empédocle et l’Orient,” Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé, 27, 4, 1968, p. 365-403.
[Disputable comparison between Emp. and Indian sources plus a very free translation of some fragments.]
– (1969) Empédocle d’Agrigente, Paris, Éditions Traditionnelles 1969 (19772, 20033).
[“Frère des chamanes, devins, voyants, bardes errants, Empédocle est le plus “hindou” des présocratiques. L’auteur découvre dans l’œuvre d’étranges rapprochements avec la cosmologie, la métaphysique et les ascèses des Orients traditionnels. L’ouvrage s’achève sur une traduction inédite et annotée des fragments.” http://www.cgjung.net/jbies/index.htm.
[+ +].]
– (2010) Empédocle. Philosophie présocratique et spiritualité orientale, Paris: Éditions Almora 2010, (Chemins de flammes).
[[+ +].]
Bignone, Ettore, (1906) “Review of Emilio Bodrero. Il principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle, 1905,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 34, 1906, p. 613-616.
– (1915) “Empedocle ed Epicuro,” Bolletino di filologia classica, 21, 1915, p. 156-161.
– (1916) “Due versi di Arato attribuiti erroneamente ad Empedocle,” Bolletino di filologia classica, 22, 1916, p. 151-152.
[B 154b.]
– (1916) Empedocle: Studio critico, traduzione e commento delle testimonianze e dei frammenti, Torino: Fratelli Bocca 1916, (Il pensiero greco, 11). Reprint in Roma: "L’Erma" di Bretschneider 1963.
[[+ +].]
– (1918) “La teoria del peso in Empedocle ed Anassagora,” Bolletino di filologia classica, 24, 1918, p. 97-100.
– (1929) “Ennio ed Empedocle,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 57, 1929, p. 10-30. Reprint in E. Bignone, Studi sul pensiero antico, Napoli: L. Loffredo 1938, (Nuova Collezione, T.I.), chap. 7, p. 327-355. Reprint in Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider 1965.
[On alleged Empedoclean content of Ennius’verses, cf. B 17.18 and frg. 357, Valmaggi.]
– (1941) “Note di critica del testo a Epicuro, a Seneca, alla vita di Empedocle di Diogeni Laerzio, a Polistrato epicureo,” Bolletino del comitato per la preparazione dell’edizione nazionale dei classici greci e latini, 2, 1941, p. 103-109.
[P. 106: A 1.]
Bilić, Tomislav, “Early identifications of Apollo with the physical sun in Ancient Greece,” Mnemosyne, 2020, p. 1-28, (ahead of print, online), 74, 5, 2021, p. 709-736 (printed version).
[A 23, B 134.]
Billings, Joshua, The philosophical stage: drama and dialectic in classical Athens, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2021.
Bing, Peter, “The Voice of those who live in the Sea: Empedocles and Callimachus,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 41, 1981, p. 33-36.
[B 74, B 71.]
Birch, Thomas (ed.), The works of Ralph Cudworth, D.D., containing the true intellectual system of the universe, Sermons, &c., a new edition, with references to the several quotations in the intellectual system, and a life of the author, by Thomas Birch M.A. F.R.S., in four volumes, Vol. I, Oxford: D. A. Talboys 1829.
[Empedocles: p. 93-98, 111-118, 325-327.]
Blanc Alain. - De Lamberterie Charles, “Chronique d'étymologie grecque n° 14 (CEG 2015),” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 87, 2, 2013, p. 157-202.
[B 110.10.]
Blass, Friedrich, “Zu Empedokles,” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, 1883, p. 19-20.
[B 23.9, B 84, B 85, B 121.1.]
Blavatsky, H.P, Isis unveiled. Collected writings, vol 1-2, New York-London 1877, Theosophical Pub. House 1972.
Bluck, Richard Stanley Harold, “On ΤΡΑΓΙΚΗ: Plato, Meno 76 E,” Mnemosyne, 4, 14, 1961, p. 289-295.
[A 921.]
– Plato’s Meno, Cambridge 1964, p. 61-75.
[“Transmigration and recollection before Plato”: B 115, B 146, B 117, B 64 and 250-3 A 921.]
Blumenthal, Henry Jacob, “Empedocles frg. 17.19-20,” Grazer Beiträge, 3, 1975, p. 21-29.
[B 17.]
Bocayuva, Izabela Aquino, “Filosofia como tradição e a "presença" de Empédocles no Banquete,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 68-73.
[Released in October 2014. A 86, B 107.]
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1451/1292
Bock, Martin, “Aischylos und Akragas,” Gymnasium, 65, 1958, p. 402-450.
Bodei Giglioni, Gabriella, “Come gli uomini divennero malvagi: sviluppo della civiltà, alimentazione e sacrificio in Teofrasto,” Rivista storica italiana, 103, 1991, p. 5-32.
[B 128, B 154.]
Bodéüs, R., “De la poésie à la métaphysique. Regards sur un terme d’Empédocle,” Revue Belge de philologie et d´histoire, 52, 1974, p. 36-58.
Bodnár, István & Michael Chase & Michael Share (transl.), Simplicius. On Aristotle Physics 8.1-5, London: Bristol Classical Press 2012. Paperback in 2014 by Bloomsbury.
Bodrero, Emilio, Il principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle. Studio preceduto da un saggio bibliografico e dalla traduzione dei frammenti Empedoclei, Roma: Ermanno Loescher & Co.1904.
[Roma: Giorgio Bretschneider 19752, (Philologica, 2). [+ +].]
Böhme, Angelika, Die Lehre von der Seelenwanderung in der antiken griechischen und indischen Philosophie: ein Vergleich der philosophischen Grundlegung bei den Orphikern, bei Pythagoras, Empedocles und Platon mit dem Upanischaden, dem Urbuddhismus und dem Jainismus, diss., Jüchen, Düsseldorf 1989, p. 29-41. (On Emp. daimonology: B 115, B 141, B 117, B 140, B 146 etc.]
Böhme, Hartmut, “Die vier Elemente: Feuer Wasser Erde Luft,” in: Vom Menschen. Handbuch der historischen Anthropologie, ed. Ch. Wulf, Munich: Beltz 1997, p. 17-46.
[B 6, B 86, B 89.]
Böhme, Gernot & Böhme, Hartmut, Feuer, Wasser, Erde, Luft: Eine Kulturgeschichte der Elemente, Munich: C.H. Beck, 1996. (2004, 2010, 2014).
[P. 48-49, 93-100. B 6, B 8. B 17, B 26, B 27, B 28.]
Boissonade, Jean-François (ed.), Tzetzae Allegoriae Iliadis accedunt Pselli Allegoriae quarum una inedita, Paris: Dumont1851.
[P. 18-19, v. 288-309: storm of the elements.]
Bollack, Jean, (1957) “Die Metaphysik des Empedokles als Entfaltung des Seins,” Philologus, 101, 1957, p. 30-54.
– (1958) “Styx et serments,” Revue des études grecques, 71, 334-338, 1958, p. 1-35.
[B 30, B 115. Reprint in La Grèce de personne, 1997, with little modifications, p. 265-287, 435-443.]
– (1959) “Lukrez und Empedokles fr. 110,” Die Neue Rundschau, 70, 1959, p. 656-689.
[B 110.]
– (1959) “Le Proème du Περὶ φύσεως d’Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 72, 1959, p. 15-16.
– (1960) “Lukrez I. 1114-1117 und Empedokles fr. 110,” Philologus, 104, 1960, p. 295-298.
– (1961) “Eros und die Liebe. Der Mythos des Aristophanes im Gastmahl des Plato,” Die Neue Rundschau, 72, 1961, p. 781-793.
– (1965) “Empédocle ou l’ancienne physique,” L’information littéraire [historique ?], 17, 1965, p. 203-207.
– (1965-1969) Empédocle, I-III, Paris : Éditions de Minuit 1965-1969, (Le sens commun). I: Introduction à l’ancienne physique, 1965; II: Les Origines, édition et traduction des fragments et des témoignages, 1969; III: Les Origines, commentaire 1, 1969; III: Les Origines, commentaire 2, 1969. Reprint Paris: Gallimard 1992, (Tel, 201, 202, 203).
[Reprint "commentaire 1" and "commentaire 2" are in one book (Gallimard, [Tel, 203]) instead of two books in 1969. [+ +].]
– (1966) “Review of G. Nélod, Empédocle d’Agrigente, 1959,” Gnomon, 38.7, 1966, p. 725-727.
– (1968) “Les zones de la cosmogonie d’Empédocle,” Hermes, 96, 2, 1968, p. 239-240.
– (1968) “Une histoire de σοφίη,” Revue des Études Grecques, 81, 386-388, 1968, p. 550-554.
[Discussion of B. Gladigow, Sophia und Kosmos, Hildesheim 1965. B 129.]
– (1969) L’autre Grèce (entretien avec Jean Bollack), in: Le Monde, 20 décembre 1969.
– (1970) “Empédocle,” in: Encyclopædia Universalis, 6, Paris: 1970, p. 146-147.
[The text has been modified later, probably for the 5th edition in 2002, just before Empédocle: Les Purifications was out, after publication of L’Empédocle de Strasbourg, 1999, in order to include the edition of the Papyprus. The bibliography following the text helps to precise the date of publication.]
– (1971) “Review of D. O’Brien, Empedocles’ cosmic cycle. A reconstruction from the fragments and secondary sources,” Cambridge, 1969,” Gnomon, 43.5, 1971, p. 433-439.
– (1982) “Empedocle e la fisica antica,” in: I Presocratici, ed. W. Lezsle, Bologna: Società ed. il Mulino, 1982, p. 353-362.
[Italian translation of Empédocle ou l’ancienne physique appeared in L’information littéraire, 17, 1965, p. 203-207.]
– (1985) “Le modèle scientiste : Empédocle chez Freud,” Littoral, 15-16 (L’hainamoration de transfert), 1985, p. 21-27.
[Revue de psychanalyse, Actes du colloque organisé par Littoral les 24 et 25 novembre 1984 à Paris.]
– (1987)“Empedokles von Agrigent,” in: Der Neue Pauly, herausgegeben von H. Cancik und H. Schneider, Stuttgart-Weimar: 1997, Band III, p. 1011-5.
– (1997) La Grèce de personne, Paris: Éditions du Seuil 1997.
[P. 107-114, 396-397 (notes): “Le modèle scientiste : Empédocle chez Freud.” P. 265-287, 435-443(notes): “Styx et serments.”.]
– (1998) “Empédocle. L’atelier d’Agrigente,” Interview France Culture in "Une vie, une Œuvre", 3 mars 1998.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kui9VwgjA54
– (2000) “Empédocle sur papyrus,” Quinzaine littéraire, 784, May 1, 2000, p. 19.
– (2001) “'Voir la Haine' : Sur les nouveaux fragments d’Empédocle,” Methodos, 1, 2001, p. 173-185.
– (2001) “Remarques générales et particulières,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 69-77.
– (2003) Empédocle. Les Purifications. Un projet de paix universelle, édité, traduit du grec et commenté par J. B., Paris: Éditions du Seuil 2003. Spanish translation by José M. Zamora: Bollack J., Empédocles: Las purificaciones, Madrid: Arena Libros 2007.
[ [+ +].]
– (2005) “Empedocles: two theologies, two Projects,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 45-72.
– (2006) Parménide. De l’Étant au Monde, Lagrasse: éditions Verdier 2006, (Poche).
[Emp.: several pages;. B 8.]
– (2006) “13 - Empedokles,” in: Dichtung wider Dichtung. Paul Celan und die Literatur, Wallstein Verlag 2006, p. 301-314.
[Translation of “chap. 13, Lecture de l’antique,” p. 196 in: Poésie contre poésie : Celan et la littérature, Paris: PUF 2011.]
– (2007) “Arcimboldo rencontre Empédocle,” Philosophie magazine, 10, septembre, 2007.
– (2013) “Empédocle,” in: J. Bollack, Au Jour le jour, Paris: PUF 2013, p. 203-214.
[A1.72, B 6, B 143.]
– (2016) The art of reading: from Homer to Paul Celan, translated by C. Porter and S. Tarrow with B. King, ed. C. Koenig, L. Muellner, G. Nagy & S. Pollock, Cambridge (Ma)-London: Center for Hellenic Studies 2016, (Hellenic Studies, 73).
[Chap. 6: Purifications, p. 65-88; Chap 13: Reading the cosmogonies; p. 165-166; Chap 14: Empedocles: a single project, two theologies, p. 167-180; The scientist model: Freud and Empedocles: p. 249-256. In short: several texts written by Bollack and translated into English. Useful on-line, the book:
https://chs.harvard.edu/CHS/article/display/6650.jean-bollack-the-art-of-reading-from-homer-to-paul-celan
Bollack, Jean & Balaudé, Jean-François, “Empédocle d’Agrigente,” in: Encyclopédie philosophique universelle III/1: Les Œuvres, ed. J.-F. Mattéi, Paris: P.U.F. 1992, p. 124-127.
Bollack, Mayotte, “La chaîne aimantine, Lucrèce et ses modèles grecs,” Revue des études latines, 41, 1963, p. 165-185.
[A 89.]
Bonamy, Pierre-Nicolas, “Recherches sur la vie d’Empédocle,” in Mémoires de littérature tirés de l’Académie royale des inscriptions et belles lettres, 10, 1736, p. 54-75 (transl. by Michael Hissmann into Deutsch under title “Ueber das Leben des Empedokles,” Magazin für die Philosophie und ihre Geschichte, 2, 1779, p. 183-222.
Bonnard, Jean-Baptiste, Le Complexe de Zeus : Représentations de la paternité en Grèce ancienne, Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne 2004.
[B 63, B 66, A 81.]
Bonnechere, Pierre & Cursaru Gabriela, “᾿Aρχή and δῖνος: vortices as cosmogonic powers and cosmic regulators. Study case: the whirling lightning bolt of Zeus,” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 21-22, 1, 2020, p. 449-478.
[B 35.]
Booth, Nathaniel B., “Empedocles’ account of breathing,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 80, 1960, p. 10-15.
– “Aristotle on Empedocles B 100,” Hermes, 103, 1975, p. 373-375.
[B 100.]
– “A mistake to be avoided in the Interpretation of Empedocles fr. 100,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 96, 1976, p. 147-148.
[B 100.]
Bordigoni, Carlitria, “Empedocle e la dizione omerica,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 199-289.
[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 27, B 29, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 39, B 40, B 42, B 45, B 51, B 61, B 62, B 70, B 73, B 74, B 83, B 84, B 85, B 86, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 101, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 111.]
Borkowski, Zbigniew, “Local Cults and Resistance to Christianity,” The Journal of Juristic Papyrology, 20, 1990, p. 25-30.
[About non-Christian cults in Achmim where the Pap. Strasb. was written.]
Borman, Karl, Parmenides. Untersuchungen zu den Fragmenten, Hamburg 1971.
Bornheim Gerd A.(ed.], Os filósofos Pré–socráticos. São Paulo: Cultrix 1967.
Börtzler, Friedrich, “Zu den antiken Chaoskosmogonien,” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 28, 1930, p. 253-268.
[p. 262-267: on influence of Empedoclean roots in the form of the primordial disordered mixture on the Roman interpretation of Hesiodic Chaos; brief notices of B 8, B 16, B 17, B 28.]
Bos, Abraham P. & Rein Ferwerda, Aristotle, On the life-bearing spirit (De Spiritu): a discussion with Plato and his predecessors on pneuma as the instrumental body of the soul. Introduction, translation, and commentary by A. P. B. & R. F., Leiden-Boston: Brill 2008.
[A 78, B 8, B 96, B 100.]
Botteri, Gerardo & Roberto Casazza, El sistema astronómico de Aristótele: Una interpretación, Buenos Aires: Biblioteca Nacional 2015.
[Emp. in chapter II, La esfericidad del Todo en la filosofía presocrática, p. 35-54, sp. p. 46-51.]
Bouché-Leclerc, Auguste, Histoire de la divination dans l’Antiquité, I, Paris: E. Leroux 1879.
– Histoire de la divination dans l’Antiquité, II, III, Paris: E. Leroux 1880.
Boulogne, Jacques, “Plutarque exégète d’Empédocle. Une leçon de lecture,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 22, 2, 2004, p. 97-110.
[B 8, B 9, B 11, B 15.]
Boussoulas, Nicolas-Isidore, “Essai sur la structure du mélange dans la pensée présocratique. Héraclite,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 60, 3, 1955, p. 287-298.
[B 26, B 110.]
– “Essai sur la structure du mélange dans la pensée présocratique. Empédocle,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 63, 2/3, 1958, p. 135-148.
[B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 16, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 24, B 27, B 26, B 35, B 62, B 71, B 89, B 90, B 96, B 98, B 107, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 132, B 134, B 135, B 146, B 147. Sphairos as total fusion of the elements. Heraclitus, Anaxagoras.]
– “La structure du mélange dans la pensée antique,” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 19, 1960, p. 481-498.
[Emp.: p. 482-483.]
– “La structure du mélange dans la pensée de Parménide,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 69, 1, 1964, p. 1-13.
[Philotès and Neikos. B 8, B 9, B 26, B 27a, B 27, B 28, B 35, B 36.]
Boyancé, Pierre, “Sur quelques vers de Virgile (Géorgiques, II, v. 490-492),” Revue archéologique, 25/5, 1927, p. 361-379.
[B 129.]
– “Les deux démons personnels dans l’antiquité grecque et latine,” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 61, 1935, p. 189-202.
[P. 199-200 : B 122.]
– Le culte des Muses chez les philosophes grecs : études d’histoire et de psychologie religieuses, Paris: De Boccard 1936, (Bibliothèque des écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, 141). (Reprint with addenda: 1972².)
[Chap. VI – A 15.]
– “L’Apollon solaire,” in: Mélanges d’archéologie, d’épigraphie et d’histoire offerts à Jérôme Carcopino, ed. J. Heurgon, W. Seston & G. Charles-Picard, Paris, Hachette 1966.
Brague, Rémi, “The body of speech: A new hypothesis in the compositional structure of Timaeus’ monologue,” in: Platonic Investigations, ed. Dominic J. O’Meara, Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press 1985, p.53-83, (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 13).
[Pages 57-58: B 29, B 134.]
Brague Rémi, Freudenthal Gad, “Ni Empédocle, ni Plotin : pour le dossier du pseudo-Empédocle arabe,” in: Agonistes - Essays in honour of Denis O'Brien, ed. J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 267-283. Reprint London-New York: Routledge 2017.
Brandis, Christian August, “Bemerkungen über die Reihenfolge der Ionischen Physiologen und über einzelne ihrer Lehre,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 3, 1, 1829, p. 107-147.
– Handbuch der Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Philosophie, I, Berlin: G. Reimer 1835.
[Emp.: p. 188-232.]
– Geschichte der Entwicklungen der griechischen Philosophie und ihrer Nachwirkungen im römischen Reiche, I, Berlin: G. Reimer 1862.
[Emp.: 103-119.]
– “Empedocles,” in: Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology, ed. W. Smith, 1870, volume 2, Boston: Little, Brown, and company, p. 12-14.
Brás dos Santos, Evaniel, “Vestígios da cosmologia de Empédocles em fontes latinas dos séculos XII-XIII,” Dissertatio, [44] 131, 2016, p. 131-150.
Breidenstein, Joseph I., “Parmenides and Empedocles,” in: J. I. Breidenstein, Nietzschean, feminist, and embodied perspectives on the Presocratics. Philosophy as partnership, Cham (Swiss): Palgrave Macmillan (Springer) 2023, p. 191-254.
[Emp.: p. 217-248. A 1, A 43, A 95, B 2, B 6, B 11, B 13, B 17, B 20, B 23, B 27a, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 105, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 124, B 126, B 127, B 128, B 129, B 134, B 146, B 147, B 153.]
Bremer, Dieter, “Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher,” Poetica, 12, 1980, p. 350-376.
– “Hölderlin, Homer und Empedokles: Der Dichter-Philosoph als Seher und seine griechischen Vorbilder,” in: Begegnung mit dem “Fremden”. Akten des internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses, ed. E. Iwasaki & Sch. Yoshinori, Tokyo-Munich 1991, p. 349-361.
[Probably an art-historical article.]
Bremmer, Jan N., The early Greek concept of the soul, Princeton University Press 19934 (19831).
– The rise and fall of the afterlife, London-New York: Routledge 2002.
[B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 139, B 147, Pap. Strasb. aii7, d5-6.]
– “Balaam, Mopsus and Melampous: Tales of Traveling Seers,” in: The prestige of the pagan prophet Ballam in Judaism, early Christianity and Islam, ed. van Kooten, Geurt Hendrik – van Ruiten, Jacques, Leiden: Brill, 2008, p. 49–67.
[P. 65-66: Emp. as a seer and purifier. Printed also in: J. Bremmer, Greek religion and culture, the Bible, and the ancient Near East, Leiden: Brill 2008, p. 133-151.]
– “The place of performance of Orphic poetry (OF 1),” in: Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic fragments in honour of Alberto Bernabé, ed. Miguel Herrero de Jáurequi et alii, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2011, p. 1-6.
[P. 2, n. 7: Empedocles, heavily influenced by the Orphics, borrowed from them the verses B 3.3-5 DK; a short mention without argumentation.]
Brémond, Mathilde, Empédocle chez Hippolyte de Rome, mémoire de Master II, Lettres Classiques et Philosophie, Université Paris IV Sorbonne, 2011-2012.
– “Le logos d’Empédocle : reconstruction d'une lecture stoïcienne,” Elenchos, 38, 1-2, 2017, p. 127-149.
[B 2, B 3, B 109, B 110, B 131.]
– “Les Présocratiques (A),” in: L’Encyclopédie philosophique, ed. M. Kristanek, 2019, On-line:
https://encyclo-philo.fr/les-presocratiques-a
[A 30, B 6, B 17, B 20, B 30, B 57, B 61, B 84, B 100, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 137.]
– “Éléments et zones du monde d’Homère à Empédocle,” Philosophie antique, 21 (Les éléments), 2021, p. 7-29.
[A 30, B 17, B 21, B 38, B 52.]
– “Intentional alterations in cover texts and their impact on text editing – The case of Hippolytus of Rome,” in: Fragmente einer fragmentierten Welt: zur Problematik des Umgangs mit Fragmenten in der gegenwärtigen klassisch-philologischen Forschung, ed. F. Neuerburg, Th. Tsiampokalos & P. Wozniczka, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter, 2024, p. 105-122.
[B 6, B 29, B 109.]
Brenk, Frederick E., ““A most strange doctrine.” Daimon in Plutarch,” The Classical Journal, 69, 1, 1973, p. 1-11.
[De esu.]
– “An imperial heritage: the religious spirit of Plutarch of Chaironeia,” in: Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (ANRW), II, 36.1, (Historische Einleitung; Platonismus), ed. W. Haase & H. Temporini, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter1987, p. 248-349.
– “Plutarch’s daimonology,” in: Frederick E. Brenk on Plutarch, religious thinker and biographer. “The Religious Spirit of Plutarch of Chaironeia” and “The Life of Mark Antony,” ed. L. Roig Lanzillotta, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2017, (Brill’s Plutarch Studies, 1), p. 43-65.
Bréton, Guillaume, Essai sur la poésie philosophique en Grèce, Xénophane, Parménide, Empédocle, Paris: Hachette 1882, p. 177-257.
Brieger, Adolf, “Das atomistische System durch Correctur des anaxagoreischen Entstanden,” Hermes, 36, 1901, p. 161-181, p. 170-172.
[Emp. was not any atomist.]
Brink, C. O., “Horace and Empedocles´ temperature. A rejected fragment of Empedocles,” Phoenix, 23, 1969, p. 138-142.
[A 162.]
Brisson, Luc, “Le corps ‘dionysiaque’ : L'anthropogonie décrite dans le Commentaire sur le Phédon de Platon (1, par. 3-6) attribué à Olympiodore est-elle orphique ?,” in: ΣΟΦΙΗΣ ΜΑΙΗΤΟΡΕΣ Chercheurs de sagesse. Hommage à Jean Pépin, (Collection des Études Augustiniennes, Série Antiquité-131), Paris: 1992, p. 481-499.
[B 115 related to De esu carnium I, 996 b-c.]
Broadie, Sarah, “Rational theology,” in: The Cambridge Companion to ancient Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 225-249. (Emp.: p. 216-220, B 17, B 29, B 134.]
Bröcker, Walter, Die Geschichte der Philosophie vor Sokrates, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann 1965.
Brown, Geoffrey, “The Cosmological theory of Empedocles,” Apeiron, 18, 1984, p. 97-101.
Brown, Robert D., “Lucretian Ridicule of Anaxagoras,” The Classical Quarterly, 33, 1983, p. 146-160. (Emp., p. 148-149; B 6.]
Brown, T. S., “The Greek Exiles: Herodotus’ Contemporaries,” Ancient World, 17, 1988, p. 17-28. [Anaxagoras, Empedocles.]
Broze Michèle, “Les sept propos de Méthyer. Structure narrative et théorie du savoir dans la cosmogonie de Neith à Esna”, Bulletin de l’Institut français d’Archéologie orientale, 99, 1999, p. 63-72.
[B 6.]
Brucker, Jacob, Historia critica philosophiae, I, Leipzig: Ch. Breitkopf 1742, p. 1106-1120. (Reprint Leipzig: Weidmann & Reich 1767, p. 1106-1120.)
Bruhat, Marie-Odile, “L’écriture du savoir chez Tertullien. De anima, X, 1- 7 et De pallio, III, 1-3,” in: Écritures des savoirs dans l’Antiquité aux premiers siècles de notre ère, ed. V. Naas & M.-P. Noël, Paris: Classiques Garnier 2023, p. 353-383.
Brun, Jean, Empédocle ou le Philosophe de l’amour et de la haine : présentation, choix de textes, traduction et bibliographie, Paris: Seghers 1966, (Philosophes de tous les temps, 27).
[A study plus the translation of the fragments and some testimonies. [+ +].]
– “Chapitre V Empédocle,” in: Les Présocratiques, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1968, ("Que sais-je ?", 1319), p. 85-104. New edition in 2003, p. 81-99.
Brunck, Richard Franz Philipp, Analecta veterum poetarum graecorum I-III, Argentorati : I. H. Heitz 1772 (I), 1773 (II), 1776 (III), I.163.
[B 156, B 157.]
Brunschwig, Jacques, “Review of Empédocle, I : Introduction à l’ancienne physique, 1965, by Jean Bollack”, Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 157, 1967, p. 128-133.
– “On Generation and Corruption I. 1: a false start?,” in: Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book 1, Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. F. de Haas & J. Mansfeld, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2004, p. 25-63.
[§9 - The trouble with Empedocles, p. 48-50; §10 - 314b7–8: the quotation of Empedocles fr. B8. 1 and 3 DK, p. 51-55; §11 - 314b15–26: Empedocles makes alloiôsis impossible, p. 55-58; §12 - 12. 315a3–25: the last salvo of criticisms against Empedocles, p. 58-60 – B 8, B 21.]
Brunschwig, Jacques & Geoffrey E. R. Lloyd (eds.), Greek thought: a guide to classical knowledge, Cambridge (Mass.)-London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2000, (Harvard University Press reference library). English version of Le savoir grec (1996), without the chapter about Empedocles.
Büchel, Carl, Die Lehre von der elementaren Zusammensetzung der Körper in ihrer Entwicklung von Empedokles bis Lavoisier, Druck von M. Becker, Düren 1876.
Buchheim, Thomas, “Maler, Sprachbildner: Zur Verwandtschaft des Gorgias mit Empedokles,” Hermes, 113, 4, 1985, p. 417-429.
– Die Vorsokratiker: ein philosophisches Porträt, Munich: C.H. Beck 1994.
[Chap. V: Die Wurzeln des Wachstums: Empedokles von Akragas, p. 145-182; p. 37, 239-241. B 6.]
Bucur Bogdan G., Bucur Cristina, “The place of splendor and light: Observations on the paraphrasing of Enn 4.8.1 in the Theology of Aristotle,” Le Muséon, 119, 2006, p. 271-292.
http://www.bgbucur.com/PDFuri/Museonart.pdf
[Arabic Plotinus - B 115.]
Bueno, Gustavo, “Empédocles y Anaxágoras,” in: La metafísica presocrática, Oviedo: Pentalfa 1974, p. 281-326. (Historia de la Filosofía, 1).
http://www.fgbueno.es/med/dig/gb74mp4.pdf http://www.fgbueno.es/gbm/gb74mp.htm
Bufalini, M. et al., “Geo-environmental changes and historical events in the area of the Greek archaeological site of Selinunte,” Caminhos da História, 27, 1, 2022, p. 70-90.
https://www.periodicos.unimontes.br/index.php/caminhosdahistoria/article/view/4845/4933 (pdf)
[A 1.70.]
Buffière, Félix, Les Mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1956, (Collection d’études anciennes). Reprint Les Belles Lettres: 1973.
[B 6, B 120, B 126, B 127, B 137, B 139.]
– (ed.) Héraclite. Allégories d’Homère. Texte établi et traduit par Félix Buffière, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1962, (Collection des Universités de France).
[B 6.]
Buhl, Maria Sophia, Untersuchungen zu Sprache und Stil des Empedokles, diss., Heidelberg 1956.
Bulcão, Marly, “En retrouvant Empédocle : un prétexte pour philosopher,” Diotima, 43, p. 121-130, 2015. [Empedocles and Bachelard.]
Buono, Ermindo, “Between Orphic-Pythagoreanism and Plato: Empedocles and the analogy of the cave,” in: Empedocles in Sicily, ed. Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Jennifer Ferriss-Hill & Heather L. Reid, Siracusa (Sicily)-Dakota Dunes (SD): Parnassos Press 2024, (The Heritage of Western Greece, 12), p. 167-184.
[B 112, B 115.]
Burkert, Walter, (1962) “ΓΟΗΣ. Zur griechischen ‘Schamanismus’,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 105, 1, 1962, p. 36-55.
–– (1969) (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt-Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1969.
– (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, tr. by. E. L. Minar, Jr, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press 1972. (Weisheit und Wissenschaft, Nüremberg: H. Carl 1962).
[A 30, A 50, A 56, A 62, A 75, A 83, B 27, B 44, B 48, B 96, B 111, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 129, B 141, B 153a.]
– (1972) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle II-III, 1969,” Gnomon, 44, 5, 1972, p. 433-442.
[Important.]
– (1974) “Review of G. Zuntz, Persephone,” Gnomon, 46, 4, 1974, p. 321-328.
[P. 324-325. B 137.2, B 121.3.]
– (1975) “Plotin, Plutarch und die platonisierende Interpretation von Heraklit und Empedokles,” in: Kephalaion. Studies in Greek philosophy and its continuation offered to C.J. de Vogel, ed. J. Mansfeld - L. M. de Rijk, Assen: Van Gorcum 1975, (Wijsgerige texten en studies, 23), p. 137-146.
– (1984) “Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Museum Helveticum, 41, 4, 1984, p. 246.
– (1999) “Diels Vorsokratiker: Rückschau und Ausblick,” in: Hermann Diels (1848-1922) et la science de l’Antiquité, Vandoeuvres-Genève 1999, (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, 45), p. 169-206.
– (2004) Die Griechen und der Orient. Von Homer bis zu den Magiern, Munich: C. H. Beck 2003.
[Emp.: p. 125-126. Emp. and the Orient; the possible knowledge of the Eastern texts is undetectable in Empedocles and only tiny useful for interpretation of his philosophy.]
Burnet, John, Early Greek philosophy, London-Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black 18921; London: Adam and Charles Black 19082; London: Adam and Charles Black 19203, London: Macmillan 19304. Reprints in New York: Meridian books library edition, 1957, 1958.
French translation by A. Reymond, John Burnet. L’aurore de la philosophie grecque, Paris: Payot & Cie 1919. Translation from 19082. Reprints: 1952, 1970.
[Emp.: 18921, p. 207-271; 19082, p. 227-289; 19203, p. 197-250; 19304, p. 197-250. [+ +].]
– Greek philosophy: Thales to Plato, London: Macmillan 1914.
[Several reprints. Empedocles: p. 71-75. B 100.]
Burstyn, Harold L., “The empirical basis of the four elements,” in: XIIe congrès international d’histoire des sciences, Paris 1968, Actes Tome IIIa, Science et Philosophie, Paris: A. Blanchard 1971, p. 19-24.
[A 28, A 30, A 49, B 115.]
Burnyeat, Miles F., “Empedocles Scholarship (Author’s Response to Letter of Catherine Osborne),” The Times Literary Supplement June 11, 1999, p. 17.
Bussanich, John, “Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient Philosophy,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 97.10.19.
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/1997/97.10.19
– “Reincarnation and salvation in Magna Graecia and Plato,” in: Philosopher kings and tragic heroes: Essays on images and ideas from Western Greece, ed. Reid H.L.& Tanasi D., Sioux City: Parnassos Press 2016, p. 79-92.
[Empedocles’s eschatology at pages 81-84.]
Bussolini, Juan, “Concepción cosmológica de los Presocráticos,” Ciencia y Fe, 15, 1-2, 1959, p. 3-21. [Emp. p. 15-16.]
Butler, Edward, P., “Perceiving Aphrodite: Empedoclean Metaphysics,” Walking the Worlds, 4, 2, 2018, p. 40-53.
[B 2, B 20, B 6, B 84, B 109, B 110, B 128.]
Butler, James Eric, “Effluvia: Empedocles studies,” Epoché, 9/2, 2005, p. 215-231.
[B 3, B 6, B 17.3-5, B 21-5, B 35, B 84, B 89, B 100.]
Buttmann, Philippus, “Observationes in Cl. Sturzii Empedoclea,” Commentarii societatis philologicae Lipsiensis 4/1, 1804, p. 31-43.
[B 28, B 59, B 63, B 65, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 101.]
Byk, Samuel Alexander, Die vorsokratische Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer organischen Gliederung dargestellt. Erster Theil, Die Dualisten, Leipzig: Moritz Schaefer 1876.
[Emp. : p. 147-190.]
Byl, Simon, “Le vocabulaire de l’intelligence dans le chapitre 35 du livre I du traité du ‘Régime’,” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 76/2, 2002, p. 217-24.
[The chapter in question of the Hippocratic treatise sets out to classify men according to different categories of intelligence; its precedents are to be found in Empedocles, and it was read by Plato and by the author of Alcibiades II, which follows it very closely. The psychological vocabulary of the chapter is particularly rich, with six hapax legomena and six words that occur nowhere else in the Hippocratic corpus.]
Caballero, Raúl, “La tradición manuscrita del De exilio de Plutarco,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, 2000, IV, 5, 1, 2000, p. 159-185.
[B 115. Useful.]
Caballero Sánchez, Raúl, Plutarco. Consejos políticos sobre el exilio. Introducción, traducción y notas de Raúl Caballero Sánchez, Madrid: Alianza Editorial 2009, (Biblioteca temática, 8304).
[B 115.]
Caballero, Raúl & Giovanni Viansino, Plutarco. L’esilio. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento a cura di R. C. e G. V., Naples: M. D’Auria 1995, (Corpus Plutarchi moralium, 21).
[Emp.: p. 14-15, 78-81, 112-113. B 115.]
Cabral, Izabela, Silva, “Aphrodite zeídōros: a study of Philotes functions and expressions, according to Empedocles,” Revista Est. Fil. e Hist. da Antiguidade, Campinas, 39, 2, 2022, p. 51-83.
– Afrodite zeidoros, Dissertação de Mestrado, Brasilia-Manaus 2022.
Caetano-Anollés, Gustavo & Richard Janko, “Foresight: Empedocles’ On Nature, P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–6, a theory of networks and evolutionary growth ~2,400 years before Darwin,” in: Untangling Molecular Biodiversity, World Scientific 2020, p. 599-648.
– “The rise of hierarchy and modularity in biological networks explained by Empedocles’ double tale ~2,400 years before Darwin and systems biology, Frontiers in Genetics 13:973233, 2022, p. 1-6. On-line.
Cairns, David, “The Imagery of Erôs in Plato’s Phaedrus,” in: Erôs in Ancient Greece, ed. Sanders - C. Thumiger - C. Carey & N. Lowe, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
Calabi, Francesca, “Il mito di Er: le fonti,” in Platone. La Repubblica, traduzione e commento, a cura di Mario Vegetti, Vol. VII, Libro X, Naples: Bibliopolis 2007, p. 277-310.
Calame, Claude, “Procédures hymniques dans les vers des sages cosmologues : pragmatique de la poésie didactique (d’Hésiode et Théognis à Empédocle et Parménide),” in: Hymnes de la Grèce antique : Approches littéraires et historiques – Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19-21 juin 2008, ed. R. Bouchon, P. Brillet-Dubois, N. Le Meur-Weissman, Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée 2012, p. 59-77.
[See Emp.: voix d’autorité divine et publique, p. 67-74; B 1, B 3, B 112, B 131.]
– “Procedure inniche nei versi dei sophoi cosmologi. Pragmatica della poesia didascalica (da Esiodo e Teognide a Empedocle e Parmenide),”,” in: Mythologeîn: mito e forme di discorso nel mondo antico, studi in onore di Giovanni Cerri, ed. A. Gostoli - R. Velardi, Pisa: Fabrizio Serra editore 2014, (AION. Quaderni, 18), p. 151-159.
– Pratiques poétiques de la mémoire. Représentations de l'espace-temps en Grèce ancienne, Paris: éditions La Découverte 2006, (Textes à l'appui, histoire classique).
[B 6, B 115.]
Calame, Claude & Roger Chartier (eds), Identités d’auteur dans l’Antiquité et la tradition européenne, Grenoble: Jérôme Millon, 2004, (Horos).
Calderini, Aristide, “Ancora di un epigramma attribuito ad Empedocle e tradotto da Francesco Filelfo,” Athenaeum (Pavia), 3, 1915, p. 41-46.
[B 161.]
Calenda, Guido, Un universo aperto: la cosmologia di Parmenide e la struttura della terra, Bologna: Diogene Multimedia 2017, (Storia della filosofia antica).
[A 67, B 17, B 45, B 52, B 108, a(ii)13-14.]
Calogero, Guido, “L’eleatismo di Empedocle,” in: Studi in onore di Luigi Castiglioni, I, Firenze: G. C. Sansoni 1960, p. 127-167.
– Storia della Logica Antica I, L’età arcaica, Bari: Laterza 1967.
[Chap. V: Empedocle, p. 209-249. Il vario eleatismo dei pluralisti, Nascita come coesione, morte come scissione, Empedocle tra Parmenide e Melisso, Il vuoto e il pieno, L'eterno e il transeunte, Realtà dell’immortale e realtà del mortale, L’ideale dell’identità, Filosofia e poesia in Empedocle, Visione delle cose e visione dell'assoluto, Lo splendore del transeunte e la monotonia dell'eterno, Lo Sfero e la totalità delle cose, L’immortale Afrodite, La metempsicosi, Gusto della vita e timore della morte, La scoperta del molteplice immortale.]
Calvillo, Luis Santiago Reza, Imagen e imitación en la poesía de Empédocles, diss. México, 2020.
Calzolari, Alessandro, “Empedocle, Frr. 2 e 3 Diels-Kranz,” Studi classici e orientali, 34, 1984, p. 71-81.
[B 2, B 3.]
Cameron, Alister, The Pythagorean background of the theory of recollection, Menasha (Wisconsin) 1938.
[B 129: p. 20-21.]
Cambiano, Giuseppe, Filosofia e scienza nel mondo antico, Torino: Loescher 1976.
Campailla, Sergio, “La leggenda di Empedocle,” in: Studia Phoenicia and East Mediterranean in the First Millenium B. C., ed. E. Lipinski, Leuven 1987, p. 659-670.
Campbell, Gordon, Lindsay, (2000) “Zoogony and evolution in Plato’s Timaeus: The Presocratics, Lucretius and Darwin,” in: Reason and necessity. Essays on Plato’s Timaeus, ed. M. R. Wright, London: Duckworth, The Classical Press of Wales, 2000, p. 145-180.
[Emp.: p. 149-152: fr. 57, 59, 61, 71, a(ii) 23-30.]
– (2003) fragments and “The Ruin of Time”, 2003.
http://eprints.nuim.ie/97/1/The_ruin_of_time.pdf
[This paper examines the way in which poets, historians and philosophers use the topos of eternal flux, and seeks to apply some lessons learned from them to the editing and interpretation of philosophical fragments. B 11, B 15, B 17, B 111.]
– (2005) “Empedocles divided,” The Classical Review, 55, 1, 2005, p. 12-13.
[Review of J. Bollack’s book on Empédocle, les Purifications.]
– (2006) “Empedocles (of Acragas),” in: The Internet Encyclopedia of philosophy.
http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/empedocl.htm, 2006.
– (2006) Strange creatures: anthropology in Antiquity, London: Duckworth 2006.
[P. 6-9, 21-22, 30-32, 42-43. – B 12, B 23, B 26, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 96, B 98, B 128, B 130, a(ii) 23-30.]
– (2008) “"And bright was the flame of their friendship" (Empedocles B130): humans, animals, justice, and friendship, in Lucretius and Empedocles,” Leeds International Classical Studies, 7.4,
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/2008/200804.pdf, December 2008, p. 1-23.
[B 115, d MP, B 117, B 112, B 146, B 147, B 137, B 136, B 128, B 130.]
– (2014) “Lucretius, Empedocles, and Cleanthes,” in: The philosophizing Muse: The influence of Greek philosophy on Roman poetry, (Pierides, 3), ed. M. Garani & D. Konstan, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2014, p. 26-60.
– (2014) (ed.), The Oxford handbook of animals in classical thought and life, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
Campbell, Malcom, Studies in the third book of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica, Hidelsheim-Zürich-New York: Olms 1983.
[Supplementary notes, III. Apollonius and Empedocles, p. 129.]
Cañas Quirós, Roberto, “La estructura de la materia en los filósofos pluralistas pre-socráticos,” InterSedes, 13, 25, 2012, p. 143-168,
http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/666/66623936008.pdf
http://www.intersedes.ucr.ac.cr/ojs/index.php/intersedes/article/viewFile/331/322
[P. 144-154.]
Candido, Maria Regina, “O saber mágico-filosófico de Empédocles de Acragas na Atenas clássica,” Phoinix, 12, 2006, p. 189-198.
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/phoinix/article/view/33260/18686
Caneva, Stefano, “Raccontare nel tempo: narrazione epica e cronologia nelle Argonautiche di Apollonio Rodio,” in: Caneva, S. & V. Tarenzi, Il lavoro sul mito nell’epica greca. Letture di Omero e Apollonio Rodio, Pisa: ETS 2007, p. 67-135.
[Emp.: p. 77-82.]
Canivet, Pierre (ed., trans.), Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques. Texte critique, introduction, traduction et notes de P. C., s. j., Paris: Les éditions du cerf 1958, (Sources chrétiennes, 57).
Canterus, Th., Suffridi Petri de scriptoribus et illustribus Frisiae viris, Colog. Agr. 1593, Decad. 15,17
[Sturz, 1805, p. ii, informs on Canterus’ prepared, but probably never realized edition of Emp. verses; non vidi.]
Čanyšev, A. N., “Materializm Empedokla,” Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, serija filosofija, 1, 1976, p. 81-90.
– Kurs lekcij po drevnej filosofiji [Course of lessons in ancient philosophy], Moskva, Vysšaja škola 1981, p. 166-170.
[General and ideologically biased outline of Empedocles’ teaching without knowledge of the basic literature.]
Capelle, Wilhelm, “Zur Geschichte der griechischen Botanik,” Philologus, 69/4, 1910, p. 264-291.
[B 77, B 78.]
– Die Vorsokratiker, die Fragmente und Quellenberichte übersetzt und eingeleitet von W. C., Leipzig, 1935 (Stuttgart: A. Kröner 19382, 19534).
[In reprint 1986, (Kröners Taschenausgabe, 119), Emp. p. 181-249.]
– Empedokles von Agrigent. Über die Natur der Seelen. Empedokles-Zitate und Kommentar in der Übersetzung von W. Capelle, Methusalem Presse1988.
Capizzi, Antonio, Several comments in: Zeller, E. - Mondolfo, R. La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico. Parte I : I Presocratici. Volume V : Empedocle, Atomisti, Anassagora. Ed. Antonio Capizzi, Firenze: La nuova Italia 1969.
[See review by Brunschwig J. in: Revue des Études Grecques, 83, 394, 1970, p. 252-253.]
– “Trasposizioni del lessico omerico in Parmenide ed Empedocle. Osservazioni su un problema di metodo,” Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica, 25, 1, 1987, p. 107-118.
[B. 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 35, B 42.3, B 43, B 44, B 47, B 55, B 57.3, B 100, B 110.]
Cappelletti, Angel, Mitología y filosofía: los presocráticos, Editorial Cincel Kapelusz 1987², (Historia de la Filosofía, 3).
[Emp.: p. 142-165.]
Caprini, Rita & Rosa Ronzitt, “Studio iconomastico dei nomi della ‘pupilla’ nelle lingue indoeuropee e nei dialetti romanzi,” Quaderni di semantica, 28, 2, 2007, p. 287-325.
[B 84.]
Caramico, Anna, “L’aggettivo ὠγύγιος in Eschilo, Pers. 38,” Ítaca. Quaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica, 27, 2011, p. 25-34.
http://publicacions.iec.cat/repository/pdf/00000186/00000003.pdf
[B 84.]
Caramuel y Lobkowitz, Juan, Critica Philosophica. Artium Scholasticorum cursum exhibens, Vigevano, 1681.
[‘Critica philosoph. diss. V. metaph. nr. 815, p. 353’, adopted from Sturz, 1805, p. I. Could be find on-line. Just a few lines on p. 353.]
– Empedoclis Philosophiam, Lovanii
[Adopted from Mongitore, 1707, I, 174-179, precisely on p. 179; study noted by Caramuel in the previous title, p. 353.]
Cardoso, Diego Soffritti, “A física das percepções em Empédocles e Demócrito,” Revista Aproximação, 4, 2013, p. 4-13.
– A teoria dos eflúvios em Empédocles e suas reverberações, Diss. (Mestrado em Filosofia) Faculdade de Filosofia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2017.
https://ppglm.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/dissertac3a7c3a3odiegosoffritticardosoppglm.pdf.
Cardullo, R. Loredana, “Empedocle πυθαγορικός. Un’'invenzione' neoplatonica?,” in: λόγον διδόναι. La filosofia come esercizio del render ragione. Studi in onore di Giovanni Casertano, ed. Lidia Palumbo, Napoli: Loffredo 2011, p. 817-839.
Carlini, Francesco, “Lettera al Compilatore dell’estratto della Vita di Empedocle,” Biblioteca Italiana, 3, 1816, p. 73-5 = P. Giordani, Opere, ed. A. Gussalli, Milan 1857, X.38-40.
[A reaction on some theses of Scinà’s book concerning to scientific nature of fr. B 100.]
Carrizosa, Diana, El pensamiento de Empédocles a partir de sus versos, Medellín (Colombia): Universidad EAFIT, 2003, (Bordes de Vida).
Carter, Jason, W., Aristotle on earlier Greek psychology: The science of soul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019.
["Empedocles and the harmony theory": p. 134-136; "Empedocles’ psychology": p. 143-167; A 86, A 87, A 92, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 103, B 109, B 110.]
Cartlidge, Benjamin J., “Empedocles Physika 1 278 (P. Strasb. gr. Inv.1665–1666, a(ii)8),” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 203, 2017, p. 53-55.
[a(ii)8.]
– “The author of P.Oxy LXXXIII 5349 as a reader of Empedocles,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 213, 2020, p. 11-15.
[B 35.4, B 17.7-8, B 26.5-6, a(ii)19.]
Caruso, Valentina, “Empedocle, ‘figura di frontiera’,” Vichiana. Rassegna di Studi filologici e Storici IV serie, XII 1/2010, p. 99-114.
[Review of Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli, 2007.]
– “Empedocle: una duplice cosmogonia, una duplice etica,” Vichiana. Rassegna di Studi filologici e Storici IV serie, XIV 1/2012, p. 94-105.
[Review of Empedocle d’Agrigento, Napoli 2010, by Federica Montevecchi.]
Casadesús Bordoy, Francesc, “On the origin of the Orphic-Pythagorean notion of the immortality of the soul,” in: On Pythagoreanism, ed. G. Cornelli - R. McKirahan & C. Macris, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013, (Studia Praesocratica, 5), p. 153-176.
[B 117, B 129.]
Casadio, Giovanni., “La metempsicosi tra Orfeo e Pitagora,” in: Orphisme et Orphée, en l’honneur de Jean Rudhardt, ed. Ph. Borgeaud, Genève: Droz 1991, (Recherches et Rencontres, 3), p. 119-155.
[B 126, Plut. De esu.]
Casanova, Angelo, Alfredo, I frammenti di Diogene d'Enoanda, Firenze: Università degli studi di Firenze 1984, (Studi e testi, 6).
– “La critica di Diogene d’Enoanda alla metempsicosi Empedoclea (NF 2 + fr. 34 Ch.],” in: Studi in onore di Adelmo Barigazzi I-II, Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo 1986, I., p. 51-72.
[And in: Sileno, 10, 1, 1984, p. 119-130. A 99.]
Casanova-Robin, Hélène, “Reconstruire une poétique des Présocratiques : le feu dans les Métamorphoses d’Ovide,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 323-346.
[B 3, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 62, B 73.]
Casella, Federico, “Escatologia e conoscenza salvifica in Empedocle: una rilettura della metempsicosi alla luce delle teorie fisiologiche sulla mente,” Elenchos, 40, 2, 2019, p. 265-296.
[B 6, B 21, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 35, B 98, B 105, B 109, B 111, B 115, B 128, B 132, B 134, B 138, B 146, B 147.]
– “Platone e il vegetarianismo nel Timeo,” Plato Journal, 21, 2021, p. 111-124.
https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_21_8
– “Il cosmo come mezzo, il cosmo come fine: il Timeo di Platone, Empedocle e Aristotele sulla relazione tra macrocosmo e microcosmo, Thaumàzein, 10, 2, 2022, p. 24-45.
– “The four elements: living beings or inert matter? Plato’s Timaeus against Empedocles’s On nature,” Journal of Ancient Philosophy, 18, 2, 2024.
[This article is wrongly attributed to Alberto Casella. That is a mistake from the publisher. The right genuine author is Federico C. – A 33, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 71, B 115, B 128.]
– “Speaking with images: the rhetoric of metaphors and similes in Empedocles and Gorgias,” in: Empedocles in Sicily, ed. Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Jennifer Ferriss-Hill & Heather L. Reid, Siracusa (Sicily)-Dakota Dunes (SD): Parnassos Press 2024, (The Heritage of Western Greece, 12), p. 203-228.
Casertano, Giovanni, “Amore e morte in Empedocle,” Giornale di metafisica, 21, 1999, p. 51-65.
– “Orfismo e pitagorismo in Empedocle?,” in: Tra Orfeo e Pitagora, ed. Marisa Tortorelli Ghidini - Alfredina Storchi Marino - Amedeo Visconti, Napoli: Bibliopolis 2000, p. 195-236.
– (ed.), Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli: Loffredo 2007.
– “Une volta fui arbusto e muto pesce del mare,” in: G. Casertano (ed.), Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 331-337.
[B 117.]
– I presocratici, Roma: Edizioni Carocci, 2009, (Pensatori. 4).
[Chap. 6. Empedocle - Pluralisti contro monisti? La vista e gli scritti. Le radici, il cosmo e il mondo. Sensazione, pensiero e conoscenza. Il dio, l'anima e la reincarnazione.]
– “Logistikon, thymos and epithymia before Plato,” Archai, 32, 2022, p. 1-13.
[B 6, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 145.]
Casini, Paolo, “Zoogonia e transformismo nella fisica epicurea,” Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 42, 1963, p. 178-207.
[Emp.: p. 186-197.]
Castelletti, Cristiano, Porfirio. Sullo Stige, Testo greco a fronte. Introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati di C. C, Milan: Bompiani 2006, (Testi a Fronte, 99).
[A 84, B 105.]
Castner, Catherine J., “De Rerum Natura 5.101 - 3: Lucretius’ application of Empedoclean language to Epicurean doctrine,” Phoenix, 41, 1987, p. 40-49.
– The ‘Fulmen’ and Sicily: imagery in Lucretius’ sixth book,” in: Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11, ed. C. Deroux, Bruxelles, Latomus, 2003, p. 157-176.
Caston, Victor, “Empedocles’ theory of vision,”, MA thesis, University of Texas, Austin 1986.
– “The spirit and the letter: Aristotle on perception,” in: Metaphysics, soul, and ethics in ancient thought: themes from the work of Richard Sorabji, ed. R. Salles, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2005, p. 245-320. (3.1 Aristotle vs. Empedocles: p. 293-295.]
– “Perception in ancient Greek philosophy,” in: The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception, ed. M. Matthen, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 29-50.
– “Theophrastus on perceiving,” Rhizomata, 7, 2, 2019, (Special issue: Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus), p. 188-225.
Catarzi, Marcello, “La seconda "volta". Note al frammento di Empedocle DK 31 B25,” Incidenza dell'antico, 5, 2007, p. 145-173.
http://www.incidenzadellantico.it/2007_IncidAntico_%205_Abstracts.pdf
[B 25.]
Cataudella, Quintino, “Empedoclea,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 88, 1960, p. 124-132.
[B 137.]
Cavalcante de Souza, José (ed.], Os Pré-socráticos. Vida e obra, fragmentos, doxografia e comentarios seleção de textos, São Paulo: Nova Cultural 19894, (Col. Os Pensadores).
Cavalcante de Souza, José & Remberto, Francisco Kuhnen (éd. and transl.], “Empédocles de Agrigento,” in: Os Pré-Socráticos, fragmentos, doxografia e comentários, ed. Cavalcante de Souza, J. et al., São Paulo: Editora Nova Cultural 1996.
Cazzaniga, Ignazio., “Le metafore enniane relative a cielo e stelle ed alcuni placita di tradizione Anassimeno-Empedoclea,” La Parola del Passato, 26, 1971, p. 102-119.
Celotto, Giulio, Amor belli: Love and Strife in Lucan’s Bellum civile, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2022.
[B 6, B 17, B 27, B 35, B 128.]
Centrone, Bruno, “Sopravvivenza dell’anima e luoghi dell’aldilà nella filosofia greca tra vi e v sec. a.c.: Eraclito ed Empedocle,” in: La tomba del tuffatore: rito, arte e poesia a Paestum e nel mediterraneo d’epoca tardo-arcaica, atti del convegno internazionale, Paestum, 4-6 ottobre 2018, ed. A. Meriani & G. Zuchtriegel, Pisa: Edizioni ETS 2020, (Argonautica, 3), p. 335-346.
[B 6, B 15, B 17, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 121, B 147.]
Cerasuolo, Salvatore, “Empedocles frigidus,” Vichiana, 8, 1979, p. 252-279.
[A 162.]
Cerri, Giovanni, (1998) “L’ideologia dei quattro elementi da Omero ai Presocratici,” Annali dell’Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli, 20, 1998, p. 5-58.
[p. 26-32: B 6.]
– (2000) “Il poema di Empedocle ‘Sulla natura’ ed un rituale siceliota,” in: Poesia e religione in Grecia: Studi in onore di G. Aurelio Privitera, ed. M. Cannatà Fera & S. Grandolini, Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane 2000, p. 205-212.
[B 6.3.]
– (2000) “Poemi greci arcaici sulla natura e rituali misterici: Senofane, Parmenide, Empedocle,” Mediterraneo Antico, 3/2, 2000, p. 603-619.
[P. 604-613: on the mysteries celebrated in Acragas and Thurioi in honour of Nestis.]
– (2001) “'Physica' e 'Katharmoi' di Empedocle,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 181-196.
[There were three Emp. poems; B 3.1-8.]
– (2004) “Empedocle, fr. 3 D.-K: saggio di esegesi letterale,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 83-94.
[B 3.]
– (2006) “Empedocle narratore di miti: la vicenda cosmica,” A I O N, xxviii, 2006, p. 49-63.
[B 3, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 131.]
– (2007) “Livello scientifico e livello mitico nei poemi di Empedocle,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 122-142.
Chadwick, Henry, Origen: Contra Celsum, translated with an introduction & notes by H. C., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1953. Reprinted with corrections in 1965.
[B 115, B 137.]
Chaignet, Antelme-Édouard, Histoire de la psychologie des Grecs, Tome I: avant et après Aristote, Paris: Hachette et Cie 1887.
[Chapitre douzième: Empédocle, p. 82-96.]
Chang, Lian, Articulation and the origins of proportion in archaic and classical Greece, diss., McGill University, Montreal, 2009.
[The cosmogonic theories of Empedocles and Plato: Chapter Six.]
Chapouthier, Georges, “Le courant zoophile dans la pensée antique,” Revue des questions scientifiques, 161/3, 1990, p. 261-287, p. 266-267
[Superficial, unprecise, without direct evidence, and dependent on invalid literature.]
Charlton, William (transl.), Philoponus. On Aristotle on the intellect (De Anima 3.4-8), translated by William Charlton, London: Gerald Duckworth 1991, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). Reprint in London-New York: Bloomsbury 2014.
[B 57, B 89.]
– ‘Philoponus’. On Aristotle on the soul 3.9-13, with Stephanus. On Aristotle on the interpretation, London: Gerald Duckworth 2000, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). Reprint in London-New York: Bloomsbury 2014.
Cherniss, Harold, Aristotle’s criticism of Presocratic philosophy, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press 1935.
Chilton, C. W. (ed.), Diogenis Oenoandensis fragmenta, Leipzig: Teubner 1967, (Biblioteca teubneriana)..
[Emp.: fr. 34, p. 60.]
– Diogenes of Oenoanda. The fragments. A translation and commentary by C. W. Chilton. (University of Hull publications), London-New York-Toronto: Oxford University Press 1971.
[Emp. p. 5, 50, 85-87, 128-129; fr. 34 Chilton, and new fr. 2 Smith.]
Chitwood, Ava, The deaths of the Greek philosophers, Diss., Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Md. 1993
[Heraclitus, Empedocles, Democritus.]
– “The death of Empedocles,” The American Journal of Philology, 107, 2, 1986, p. 175-191.
– Death by philosophy: the biographical tradition in the life and death of the archaic philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus, and Democritus, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2004.
Χονδροκούκης, Μιχαήλ Θεόδωρος, Δαίμων και κόσμος: η ενότητα εσχατολογίας και κοσμολογίας στο έργο του Εμπεδοκλή, Diss. Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης (ΑΠΘ), 2020.
– (Chondrokoukis, Michalis), “An old dispute in the light of the Strasbourg papyrus: the relation between Empedoclean cosmology and eschatology,” Φιλοσοφία, 52, 2022, p. 359-386.
[Quote from the author: “Empedocles writes a work, subsequently an anthology is created from excerpts from it —mainly the eschatological ones— but eventually the two titles, Φυσικά and Καθαρμοί, gradually come to be used interchangeably for the empedoclean work.]
– “What draws the first breath? A reconstruction of Empedocles’ respiration theory,” Ancient Philosophy, 44, 2, 2024, p. 283-304.
[Aët. IV 22,1 and V, 15.3. οὐλοφυῆ. A74, B 100.]
Chrysanthou, Anthi, Defining Orphism: the beliefs, the teletae and the writings, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2020, (Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volumes, 94).
[B 115.]
Christianus [Chrestien], Quintus Septimus Florens, I. 'Empedoklέouj Sfaῖra, ἢ Dhmhtrίou toῦ Triklinίou. Empedoclis sphaera, vel Demetrii Triclinii senariis versibus, ab eruditiss. viris castigatis, descripta. Vetus est, et nunc primum in lucem edita, E Bibliotheca ornatissimi ac prudentiss. viri Io. à S. Andrea... II. Sphaera vetus Graeca [Empedocli tributa]: quam Latinis senariis recentavit et recensuit Q. Sept. Fl. Christianus, Lutetiae 1586-1587.
[B 161.]
Christianus, Quintus Septimus Florens, Sphaera vetus Graeca [Empedocli tributa]: quam Latinis senariis recentavit et recensuit Q. Sept. Fl. Christianus, Lutetiae 1587
[non vidi.]
Chrysakopoulou, Vasiliki, (Sylvana), Théologie versus physique dans la poésie présocratique de Xénophane à Empédocle, Thèse de doctorat, Paris, Sorbonne (Paris IV), 2003, sous la Direction de G. Romeyer Dherbey. ––
[Empédocle et Xénophane: p. 219-316; Introduction à Empédocle: p.221-235; La physique d'Empédocle à la lumière de la physique xénophanienne: p. 236-258; Démonologie et cosmologie chez Empédocle: p. 259-267; Démonologie et anthropologie chez Empédocle: p. 268-271; L'épopée d'Empédocle à l'encontre d’Hésiode: p. 272-300; La notion de bonheur divin chez Empédocle: p. 301-316.]
– “The beauty and the beast: Aphrodite and Teratogenesis in Empedocles’ Cosmogony,” in: Hybrids and extraordinary beings: Deviations from ''Normality'' in ancient Greek mythology and modern medicine, ed. P. N. Soukakos, A. Gartziou Tatti & M. Paschopoulos, Athens: Kōnstantaras Iatrikes Ekdoseis 2017.
Ciampa, Chiara Raffaella, “Eschatological visions in Pindar and Empedocles,” in: Eschatology in Antiquity: forms and functions, ed. H. F. Marlow, K. Pollmann & H. Van Noorden, London: Routledge 2021, (Rewriting Antiquity), p. 131-143.
– “The Presocratics and the gods - Review of Saetta-Cottone R. (ed.), Penser-les-dieux avec les Présocratiques,” The Classical Review, first view, 2022 (on-line), p. 1-4.
Ciancaglini, Claudia, Angela, “Aria e vuoto nella speculazione greca antica,” in: Ethnos lingua e cultura. Scritti in memoria di Giorgio Raimondo Cardona, Roma: Il Calamo 1993, (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche), p. 73-100.
[B 100.]
Ciglenečki, Jan, Empedoklova kozmološka misel v luči strasburških fragmentov: diplomska naloga, Ljubljana 2005.
[Short degree essay.]
– “Empedoklov nauk o posmrtnem preseljevanju v luči hermetičnega traktata Korē Kosmou,” Anthropos, 1-2, 2007, p. 1-24.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.anthropos.si/anthropos/2007/1_2/ciglenecki.pdf
– Empedokles. Fragmenti, Dopolnjena in razširjena izdaja, Ljubljana 2016.
http://www.kud-logos.si/e-knjige/
Ćirković, Milan M., “Ancient origins of a modern anthropic cosmological argument,” Astronomical and astrophysical transactions, 22, 6, dec. 2003, p. 879–886.
[B 21.]
Clark, Gillian, Porphyry. On abstinence from killing animals, translated by Gillian Clark, London: Gerald Duckworth 2000. Reprint in London-New York: Bloomsbury 2014.
[B 124, B 128, B 139 - Reincarnation p. 125-126.]
Clark, Gordon Haddon, Empedocles and Anaxagoras in Aristotle’s De anima, diss., Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania 1929.
Clarke, Michael, “The wisdom of Thales and the problem of the word ΙΕΡΟΣ,” The Classical Quarterly, 45.2, 1995, p. 296-317.
[Homeric background, B 134.]
– Flesh and spirit in the songs of Homer: a study of words and myths, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999. [Useful for Homeric background.]
Classen, Carl Joachim, “Empedokles,” in: Pauly-Wissowa Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Suppl. Band XII, Stuttgart 1970, p. 241-247.
Claus, David B., Toward the soul: An inquiry into the meaning of ψυχή before Plato, New Haven-London: Yale University Press 1981.
[Chapter III.2: “Eschatological uses of ψυχή: Pythagoras, Orphism, Empedocles, p. 111-123. B 112, B 115, B 117, B 134.]
Clay, Diskin, “Lucretius contra Empedoclen: a textual note,” Classical Journal, 73, 1, 1977, p. 27-29.
[A 21, B 6, B 37.]
– Paradosis and survival: Three chapters in the history of Epicurean philosophy, The University of Michigan Press 1998.
[P. 126-127 (B 71, B 21), p. 154-155 (B 3, B 131).]
– “Recovering originals: Peri Physeos and De Rerum Natura,” Apeiron, 33/3, 2000, p. 259-271.
– “Empedocles at Panopolis and Delphi,” in: Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift at Delphi in honor of Charles Kahn, ed. R. Patterson, V. Karasmanis and A. Hermann, Las Vegas - Zurich - Athens: Parmenides Publishing 2012. p. 59-78.
[Papyrus a, b, c, d Martin-Primavesi, B 3, B 17, B 20, B 76, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 131, B 133, B 139, B 140.]
Clayman, Dee, L., “Philosophers and philosophy in Greek epigram,” in: Brill's Companion to Hellenistic Epigram down to Philip, ed. P. Bing & J. S. Bruss, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2007, p. 497-517.
[Empedocles: p. 503, A1.67.]
Clements, Ashley, “On what-[it]-is-not: Gorgias and Empedocles,” in: Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae: philosophizing theatre and the politics of perception in late fifth-century Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014, (Cambridge Classical Studies), p. 33-42.
[A 92.]
Clermont - Ganneau, C., “Empédocle, Les Manichéens et les Cathares,” Journal asiatique, 9, 15, 1900, p. 179-186.
[A Syrian work of the ninth century, which depends on Epiphanius and Scithinus, asserts the predecessors of Manicheans were Pythagoras and Empedocles.]
Cleve, Felix Merori, The giants of pre-Sophistic Greek philosophy: an attempt to reconstruct their thoughts, II, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 19733 (19651, 19692), p. 329-395.
– “Review of H. Lambridis, Empedocles,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 17, 1979, p. 455-457.
Coates, Cameron, F., “Cosmic democracy or cosmic monarchy? Empedocles in Plato’s Statesman,” Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought, 35, 2, 2018, p. 418-446.
[B 17, B 26, B 30, B 115, B 130.]
Coda, Elisa, “Empedocle nel medioevo arabo attraverso la testimonianza di Temistio,” Philologia Philosophica, 1, 2022, p. 167-180.
Cohen, S. Marc, Curd Patricia & Reeve, C.D.C. (ed.), Readings in ancient Greek philosophy: from Thales to Aristotle, Indianapolis: Hackett 20114.
[P. 52-74. Translation of the fragments by R. McKirahan, 2010. [ + ].]
Cohoe, Caleb, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s On the soul: a critical guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2022.
[A 86, A 92, B 6, B 23, B 84, B 96, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 110.]
– “Review of A. G. Long, Death and immortality in ancient philosophy, 2019 and A. G. Long (ed.), Immortality in ancient philosophy, 2021,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 61, 3, 2023, p. 515-518.
Colangelo, Eleonora, Prolegomena a una nuova edizione dell’Hymn. Hom. Ap. (III), Master (Laurea Magistrale) Università di Pisa, 2015.
[B 6, B 29, B 134.]
– “Neoanalisi e intertestualità dell’Inno omerico ad Apollo: modelli, immagini, stemma,” Greaco-Latina Brunensia, 22, 2, 2017, p. 77-118.
[P. 94-97: B 6, B 134.]
Cole, F.J., “Aristotle’s lantern,” Centaurus, 1, 4, 1951, p. 377 (in Varia).
[B 84.]
Colli, Giorgio, Lezioni di storia della filosofia antica: Empedocle, Parte prima, Anno accademico 1948-49, Università degli studi di Pisa, Facultà di lettere, Pisa: Libreria 1949.
– Empedocle, A cura di Federica Montevecchi, Milan: Adelphi 2019, (Piccola Biblioteca Adelphi, 746).
Colombani, Maria Cecilia, “As relações entre poesia didática e filosofia. Hesíodo, Parmênides e Empédocles,” Revista Heródoto, 2, 1, 2017, p. 147-164.
https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/herodoto/article/view/1014/pdf_77
Conche, Marcel, Parménide. Le Poème : Fragments, texte grec, traduction, présentation et commentaire par M. C., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1996, (Épiméthée).
[A 86.12, A 86.15, B 8, B 106, B 115.]
Conger, George Perrigo, Theories of macrocosms and microcosms in the history of philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press 1922.
[Empedocles: p. 4-5. B 84, B 100.]
Conte, Gian Biagio, Generi e lettori, Milan 1991, p. 17-26.
Cook, Arthur Bernard, Zeus: A study in ancient religion, I, Zeus god of the bright sky, Cambridge: University Press 1914.
[P. 31-32 : B 6. B 62.]
Cordero, Nestor-Luis, “Platon, Empédocle, et l’origine de l’être humain,” in: Platon, source des Présocratiques: exploration, ed. M. Dixsaut - A. Brancacci, Paris, J. Vrin 2002, p. 93-106.
[A 49, A 66, A 68, A 72, B 6, B 57, B 60, B 61, B 62, B 67, B 96, B 98.]
Cornavaca, Ramón, (ed.), Filósofos presocráticos. Fragmentos II, Buenos Aires: Losada 2011.
Cornelli, Gabriele, In search of Pythagoreanism: Pythagoreanism as an historiographical category, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013.
[Chap. 3.3, 'Ten or twenty human generations' (Empedocles), p. 97-99: B 129.]
– “Aristotle and the Pythagorean myths of metempsychosis,” Méthexis, 28, 2016, p. 1-13.
[B 126, B 129.]
– “Bearing with dignity your load of inalienable responsibility: The movements of the Pythagoreans’ soul between metempsychosis, palingenesis, anamnesis and koinonia,” in: Seelenreise und Katabasis: Einblicke ins Jenseits in antiker philosophischer Literatur, Akten der 21. Tagung der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung vom 30. Juli bis 1. August 2018 in Tübingen, ed. I. Männlein-Robert, Berlin - Boston: W. de Gruyter 2021, p. 107-138.
[B 112, B 129.]
Cornelli, Gabriele, McKirahan Richard, Macris Constantinos (ed.), On Pythagoreanism, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013, (Studia praesocratica, 5).
Cornford, Francis Macdonald, (1912) From religion to philosophy. A study in the origins of Western speculation, New York-London: Longmans, Green and Co. / Edward Arnold 1912. Reprint in Princeton: Princeton University Press 1991.
[Emp.: p. 63, 150-152, 224-242. A 30, B 2, B 3, B 17, B 19, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 96, B 112, B 113, B 114, B 115, B 117, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 128, B 130, B 134, B 135, B 146, B 147.]
– (1922) “Mysticism and science in the Pythagorean tradition,” The Classical Quarterly, 16, 3/4, 1922, p. 137-150.
– (1926) “Mystery religions and pre-socratic philosophy,” in: The Cambridge ancient history, IV, The Persian empire and the West, chapter XV, ed. J. B. Bury, S. A. Cook & F. E. Adcock, Cambridge 1926, p. 522-578, 650-653. Reprint with slight corrections in 1930.
["Empedocles", p. 563-569, section X, plus bibliography p. 652. Reprint in F. M. Cornford. selected papers of F. M. Cornford, edited with an Introduction by A. Bowen, New York-London: Garland Publishing 1987, p. 36-98. Emp.: p. 77-83.]
– Plato’s cosmology. The Timaeus of Plato, translated with a running commentary, by F. M. C., London: Routledge 1937; London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co 1937. Several reprints in London and New York.
[Two hemispheres: A 30, A 56; A 74, A 83, A 89, B 17, B 29, B 61, B 84, B 96 (Bone, for example, contained four parts of fire, two of earth, one of air, and one of water), B 97, B 98, B 100, B 126. Like to like. Love and Strife. Four elements. The old seasonal ' powers' of summer and winter – the hot, the cold, the moist, the dry – … fire, air, water, and earth.]
– (1952) Principium sapientiae: the origins of Greek philosophical thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1952.
[P. 5-7, 34, 56-57, 64, 121-124, 151-152, 167-168, 177. B 3, B 17, B 28, B 100, B 115, B 129, B 134.]
Corradi, Michele, “La préhistoire de l’humanité dans le mythe d’Aristophane du Banquet de Platon, entre poésie, sophistique et philosophie” in: Miti e mitologie tra creazione e interpretazione, ed. R. Ruggiero & O. Vox, Lecce: Pensa Multimedia 2021, p. 97-136.
[B 20, B 61, B 62, B 79.]
Corrado, Alberto, “Life, death, and lightning: an alternative edition of Empedocles B 9 DK with commentary,” Classical Philology, 118, 3, 2023, p. 374-386.
[A 85, B 9.]
Costa, Alexandre da Silva, (1999) “Review of Martin & Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg,” Letras Clássicas, 3, 1999, p. 319-325.
https://www.academia.edu/50475453/L_Emp%C3%A9docle_de_Strasbourg_Resenha1999
https://www.revistas.usp.br/letrasclassicas/article/view/73773/77439
– (1999) “Um novo Empédocles?,” Philosophica, 13, 1999, p. 125-130.
https://repositorio.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/28567/1/philosophica13.pdf
– (2002) “Como e por que sobrevivem os pré-socráticos: os exemplos de Empédocles e Heraclito,” Revista filosófica de Coimbra, 11, 21, 2002, p. 163-178.
[Emp. Strasbourg.]
– (2009) Die Unterscheidung der parmenideischen Vernunft in den Werken des Zenons und des Empedokles. Diss., Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, 2009.
http://elib.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/publications/diss/E-Diss929_thesis.pdf
[B 6, B 7, B 8, B 9, B 12, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 33, B 34, B 35, B 89, B 105, B 109, B 115, B 127, B 128, B 136, B 146.]
– (2012) “Mito e filosofia em Empédocles. A redenção pelo saber,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 99-110.
http://www.ifcs.ufrj.br/~afc/2012/Costa.pdf
[B 6, B 17, B 115, B 128, B 136, B 137.]
Costello, Sean M., “Aristotle on light and vision: an ‘ecological’ interpretation,” Apeiron, 55, 2, 2022, p. 247-279.
[A 57, B 84.]
Couloubaritsis, Lambros, “The Strasbourg Empedocles (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666),” Diogenes, 1999, p. 96-99.
– Aux origines de la philosophie européenne. De la pensée archaïque au néoplatonisme, Paris-Brussels: De Boeck 20034, (Le point philosophique).
[Emp. : p. 132-138.]
– “Émergence de l’individualité dans la pratique archaïche du mythe d’Homère à Empédocle,” Hypnos, 24, 2010 (1), p. 1-23.
http://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/hypnos/article/download/4243/2853z
– “Les transfigurations de la notion de Physis entre Homère et Aristote,” Kriterion, 122, Dec./2010, p. 349-375.
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/kr/v51n122/02.pdf
[B 8, B 110.]
Couprie, Dirk, L. Heaven and Earth in Ancient Greek Cosmology, From Thales to Heraclides Ponticus, New York-Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London: Springer 2011.
[A 30, A 51, A 56, A 58, B 42.]
– “The spiral Movement of the Sun on an imaginary cylinder according to Empedocles and Anaximander,” Philosophia Classica, 15, 1, 2020, p. 4-24.
[A 1.77, A 50, A 51, A 54, A 56, A 58, A 60, A 61, B 44, B 45, B 46, B 48.]
Courtney, Edward, “The Proem of Lucretius,” Museum Helveticum, 58, 2001, p. 201-211.
[B 17.]
Covotti, Aurelio, “La filosofia nella Magna Grecia e in Sicilia fino a Socrate,” Annali delle Università Toscane, XXIII, Pisa: Vannucchi 1901.
[Empedocles: p. 137-169.]
– “Il mondo ‘non ingannevole’ di Empedocle e le sue ‘quattro radici’,” Atti dell’Accademia Pontaniana di scienze morali e politiche, 47, 1921, p. 63-84.
– “Le "Purificazioni" e la leggenda di Empedocle,” in: Atti della reale... Napoli, 1923, p. 17 ff..
– I presocratici, sagi, Napoli: Rondinella 1934, (Collezione di studi filosofici, serie storica, monografie no. 3), p. 159-187.
Cowan, Robert, “Of gods, men and stout fellows: Cicero on Sallustius’ Empedoclea (Q. FR. 2.10[9].3),” The Classical Quarterly, 63, 2, 2013, p. 764-771.
Crasso, Lorenzo, Istoria de poeti greci e di que che’n Greca lingua han poetato, Napoli, Bulifon 1678, p. 182-183.
Crispus, Joannes Baptista (Crispo, Giov. Battista), De ethnicis philosophis caute legendis disputationum .... Rome 1594.
[See L. Paquet, Y. Lafrance, Les Présocratiques [1450-1879] III, Québec: Bellarmin 1995, p. 88.]
Crowley, Timothy, J., “On the use of stoicheion in the sense of ‘element’,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, 2005, p. 367-394.
[B 6, B 17.]
– Aristotle on the matter of the elements, Diss., University of Oxford, 2009.
[P. 19-20: B 6; p. 77, 98: B 21.]
– “De generatione et corruptione 2.3: does Aristotle identify the contraries as elements?,” The Classical Quarterly, 63.1, 2013, p. 161-182.
[P. 176: B 21.]
– “Aristotle, Empedocles, and the reception of the four elements hypothesis,” in: Brill’s Companion to the reception of Presocratic natural philosophy in later classical thought, ed. C. H Harry & J. Habash, Leiden: Brill 2021, (Brill’s Companions to Philosophy, 6), p. 352-376.
[B 6, B 17, B 21, B 35.]
Crusius, Otto, “Lobon und seine Verwandten,” Philologus, 30, 1925, p. 176-191.
Cruz, Sebastiana Ferreira da, Cosmologia em Empédocles de Agrigento, Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT, TCC Monografia, Palmas, TO, 2019.
Cubells, Fernando, Los filósofos presocráticos. Estudios inéditos de filosofia antigua (Empedocles: orígenes históricos de la ciencia ética), Valencia: Facultad de Teología San Vicente Ferrer 1956 (1979).
Cucinotta, Emilia, “Empedocle e le guerre persiane,” in: Cucinotta, E., Produzione poetica e storia nella prassi e nella teoria greca di età classica, Firenze: Firenze University Press 2014, (Premio Tesi di Dottorato; 40), p. 37-43.
See: https://unipi.academia.edu/EmiliaCucinotta
[A 23, B 34, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134.]
Cudworth, Ralph, The true intellectual system of the universe, Part I, London: R. Royston 1678.
[Emp.: Book I, p. 2, 14-16 (§ XIII), 22-26 (§ XXIV), 40-41(§ XXXIII), 391-393, 410, 720, 791, 794. Useful reading to be added: Thomas Birch, The works of Ralph Cudworth, D.D., Volume 1, 1742, Reprint in Oxford: D.A. Talboys 1829. Empedocles: p. 93-98, 111-118, 325-327. Atomism. See also J. L. Mosheim.)
Culianu, Ioan P., “Iatroi kai manteis: sulle strutture dell’estatismo greco,” Studi Storico-religiosi, 4/2, 1980, p. 287-303.
[P. 290-294. E. as a shaman; the miraculous elements in his biography.]
Cumont, Franz, Recherches sur le symbolisme funéraire romain, Paris: Librairie orientaliste P. Geuthner 1942.
[P. 132-140: the later parallels of B 115.8-12 and a background of the idea; very informative text.]
Curd, Patricia, (1998) The legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic monism and later Presocratic thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1998. (Reprint in Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing 2004).
[Chapter IV 3.1 Empedocles and the roots of all things, 3.2 Particles and pores, p. 155-171, plus p. 128 n.3. A 34, A 43, A 44, A 86, A 87, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 26, B 27, B 71, B 91, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 107.]
– (2002) “A New Empedocles? Implications of the Strasburg fragments for Presocratic philosophy,” in: Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, November 2000, ed. J. J. Cleary & G. M. Gurtler, vol. 17, 1, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill 2002, p. 27-49 and 57-59 (bibliography).
– (2002) “The metaphysics of physics: mixture and separation in Empedocles and Anaxagoras,” in: Presocratic philosophy, essays in honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. V. Caston & D. W. Graham, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company 2002, p. 139-158.
[B 8, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 98, B 112, B 146.]
– (2005) “On the question of religion and natural philosophy in Empedocles,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 137-162.
– (2006) “Parmenides and after: Unity and plurality,” in: A Companion to ancient philosophy, ed. M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin, Malden-Oxford-Victoria: Blackwell Publishing 2006, (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy), p. 34-55.
[Emp.: p. 42-44.]
– (2011) A Presocratics reader: selected fragments and testimonia, edited, with introduction, by Patricia Curd; translations by Richard D. McKirahan and Patricia Curd, Indianapolis: Hackett 2011².
[Emp.: p. 73-100. [ + ].]
– (2011) “New Work on the Presocratics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 49, 1, 2011, p. 1-37.
[Emp.: p. 2-3, 26-27.]
– (2013) “Where are Love and Strife? Incorporeality in Empedocles,” in: Early Greek philosophy: The Presocratics and the emergence of reason, ed. J. McCoy, Washington, D.C.: CUA Press 2013, (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, 57), p. 113-138.
[B 2, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 30, B 33, B 35, B 36, B 71, B 73, B 96, B 98, B 109, [B 115], papyrus.]
– (2016) “Powers, structure, and thought in Empedocles,” Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 55-79.
– (2016) “Empedocles on sensation, perception, and thought,” Ancient epistemology, 19, 2016, p. 38-57.
[This issue of Ancient Epistemology is the book by Katerina Ierodiakonou & Pieter Sjoerd Hasper (ed.), Logical analysis and history of philosophy/Philosophiegeschichte und logische analyse, Münster mentis Verlag 2016. B 17, B 21, B 23, B 101a, B 105, B 106, B 107, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 143.]
Curletto, Silvio, “L’immaginazione e il concepimento: fortuna di una teoria embriogenetica e di un mito letterario,” Maia, 52/3, 2000, p. 533-564.
Cursaru, Gabriela, “Δίνη et στροφάλιγξ. La « théomachie » d’Empédocle et son modèle poétique homérique dans le chant XXI de l’Iliade,” Gaia, 26, 2023, p. 1-21.
[B 17, B 22, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 37, B 38, B 41, B 115, D73.]
Cusset, Christophe, ‘Aratos de Soles est-il « naturaliste » plutôt que poète ?,’L’homme et la science, ed. J. Jouanna, M. Fartzoff & B. Bakhouche, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2011, (Association Guillaume Budé), p. 257-266.
[A 22.]
Dacier, André, Les commentaires d’Hieroclés sur les vers dorez de Pythagore. Tome second. Paris: Rigaud 1706. English translation: The life of Pythagoras with his symbols and golden verses together with the life of Hierocles and his commentaries upon the verses, London: Jacob Tonson 1707.
Daiber, Hans, Aetius arabus. Die Vorsokratiker in arabischer Überlieferung, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner 1980, (Veröffentlichungen der Orientalischen Kommission, 33).
D’Alfonso, Francesca, “La terra desolata. Osservazioni sul destino di Bellerofonte (Il. 6, 200-202),” Museum Helveticum, 65, 2008, p. 1-21.
[B 115. See Abstract page Abstracts and summaries.]
D’Alessio, Giambattista, “The politics and poetics of salvation. Communication strategies in Pindar, Empedocles and the Getty hexameters,” La Parola del Passato, 57, 1-2, Scritti in memoria di Giovanni Pugliese Carratelli - III, 2022, p. 27-57.
[B 3, B 17, B 111, B 112, B 132, B 140, B 141, B 146, B 157.]
Darcus, Shirley, Muriel, Louise, The notion of self in Xenophanes and Heraclitus, Diss., University of Toronto, 1973.
[B 17 p. 354. B 29: p. 320-322, 341-342. B 110: p. 354. B 115, p. 319-320, 340-341, 361, 383, 471. B 129: p. 469. B 134: p. 320-322, 341-344. B 146: p. 472-473.]
– “Daimon parallels the holy phrèn in Empedocles,” Phronesis, 22, 3, 1977, p. 175-190.
[B 134.]
Darcus Sullivan, Shirley, Muriel, Louise, “The nature of Phren in Empedocles,” in: Studi di filosofia preplatonica, ed. M. Capasso - F. De Martino - P. Rosati, Napoli: Bibliopolis 1985, p. 119-136.
[B 5, B 15, B 17, B 23, B 110, B 114, B 133, B 134, B 138.]
Davies, C., “Empedocles of Acragas,” History To-day, 21, 1971, p. 708-714.
[Very sketchy and too general study on Emp. life and teaching.]
Dean, Stuart, Empedocles: The Greek text of all of the fragments (With Hyperlinks to annotations on each fragment), https://independent.academia.edu/StuartDean
https://www.academia.edu/41105256/Empedocles_The_Greek_Text_Of_All_Of_The_fragments_With_Hyperlinks_To_Annotations_On_Each_Fragment, 2021.
[[+ +].]
De Azevedo Vianna, S. B., “Empédocles e o pluralismo grego,” Kriterion, 25/72, 1984, p. 125-143.
De Cecco, Daniela, “Guerra e giustizia nella filosofia greca della natura: da Eraclito a Empedocle,” in: La guerra : una riflessione interdisciplinare, ed. Gilda Manganaro Favaretto, Trieste : Edizioni Università di Trieste 2003, p. 55-82.
Decharme, Paul, La critique des traditions religieuses chez les Grecs. Des origines au temps de Plutarque, Paris: A. Picard et fils 1904.
[P. 58-63. The author denies the existence of all traditional gods in Emp. including of those in B 6 and B 134, there are only long-lived daimones. B 6, B 115, B 128, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 137.]
Decleva Caizzi, Fernanda, “The Strasbourg Text of the Works of Empedocles,” Rivista di storia della filosofia, 55, 2000, p. 691-694.
[Review of Martin - Primavesi, 1999.]
De Crescenzo, Luciano, “Empedocle,” in: Storia della Filosofia Greca 1 - I presocratici, Milan: Arnoldo Mandadori 1983, p. 142-155.
Defradas, Jean, “Un nouvel Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 86, 1973, p. 212-223.
Degani, Enzo, ΑΙΩΝ da Omero ad Aristotele, Padua: CEDAM 1961, (Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia. Università di Padova, 37).
[Emp. p. 71-73.]
– “Empedocle B 16.2 D.- Kr.,” Quaderni dell’istituto di filologia greca, 2, 1967, p. 6-7.
[B 16.]
De Grandi, Nicola, “Riferimenti Empedoclei nelle Baccanti di Euripide,” Dioniso, 65, 1995, p. 55-59. [Bacch. 1-9 = par. B 6; Bacch. 4 = B 112.4, Bacch. 917-1170 = B 137, Bacch. 1141-2 = B 127.1.]
Deichgräber, Karl, “Review of Ernst Wenkebach,” Beiträge zur Textgeschichte der Epidemienkommentare Galens,” Gnomon, 6, 1930, p. 375-376.
[B 67.]
– “Xenophanes Περι φύσεως,” Rheinisches Museum, 87, 1938, p. 1-31, p. 22-23.
[B 2.9, B 5, B 15.3.]
Delalande, Juliette, et al. (ed.), Himation : métaphores du vêtement dans l’Antiquité classique et tardive, Pessac: Ausonius éditions 2024, (PrimaLun@ 30).
[Open access https://una-editions.fr . B 126.]
Delatte, Armand, Études sur la littérature pythagoricienne, Paris: Édouard Champion 1915, p. 39-40.
[(B 136), 41-2, n. 62 (B 2.9, B 3), 63 (B 2.6), 72 (B 152), 77 (B 112.4), 78 (B 146-B 147) and 252 (B 6 and tetraktys, B 129).]
– “Les conceptions de l’enthousiasme chez les philosophes présocratiques,” L’Antiquité Classique, 3, 1, 1934, p. 5-79.
[Emp.: p. 21-27. Printed separately with the same pagination in Collection d’Études Anciennes, Les Belles Lettres, Paris 1934; A 98, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 134.]
– “Les harmonies dans l’embryologie hippocratique,” in: Mélanges P. Thomas, Bruges 1930, p. 160-171.
Delattre Biencourt, Joëlle, Théon de Smyrne. Lire Platon. Le recours au savoir scientifique : arithmétique, musique, astronomie. Présentation, traduction et annotations par J. D. B., Toulouse: Anarchasis 2010, (Essais, série philologie).
[B 121.2: p. 271 ; B 143 : p. 39-40, 120.]
Delcourt, Marie, (1938) “Chapitre V. Les Fléaux en Sicile au temps d’Empédocle,” in: Stérilités mystérieuses et naissances maléfiques dans l’Antiquité classique, Liège: Librairie E. Droz 1938, (Bibliothèque de la faculté de philosophie et lettres, fasc. 83). Reprint Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1986, p. 83-88, Liége: Presses universitaires de Liège 1986, & OpenEdition Books 2013.
http://books.openedition.org/pulg/658
[Chap. V “Les fléaux en Sicile au temps d’Empédocle”; Emp. as a tamer of winds, a healer of plague and a baren woman: A 2, A 14; these stories are derived from B 111.2-3.]
– (1957) Héphaistos ou la légende du magicien, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1957, (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, 146).
[B 111.]
– (1958) Hermaphrodite. Mythes et rites de la bisexualité dans l’Antiquité classique, Paris: PUF 1958.
[P. 115. On possible influence of Empedoclean zoogony - A 72, B 57 - B 63 - on Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s Symposion with an general analysis of the background of the whole myth.]
– (1965) Pyrrhos et Pyrrha, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1965.
[P. 69-70. A 1, par. 68-69: immortalization of Emp. by help of fire.]
de Leo, Daniela, “Empedocle,” in: Michelstaedter filosofo del Frammento: con Appunti di filosofia di Carlo Michelstaedter, Lecce: Milella 2004, (Pubblicazioni del Dipartimento di filosofia e scienze sociali. Nuova serie. Saggi / Università degli studi di Lecce, 13), p. 52-63.
de Ley, Herman, “Empedocles’ sexual theory: a note on fragment B 63,” L’Antiquité Classique, 47, 1, 1978, p. 153-162.
[A 72, A 81, B 61, B 62, B 63.]
– “Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” L’Antiquité Classique, 54, 1985, p. 343-344.
della Corte, Francesco, “Gli Empedoclea e Ovidio,” Maia, 37, 1985, p. 3-12.
del Lucchese, Filippo, Monstrosity and philosophy: radical otherness in Greek and Latin culture, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2019.
[B 17, B 21, B 35, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 73, B 75, B 87, B 97, B 115.]
del Pino, Matilde, La realidad en la sabiduría presocrática. Empédocles - Heráclito - Parménides, Barcelona: Vision Libros 1981.
Demand, Nancy, “Pindar’s Olympian 2, Theon’s Faith and Empedocles’ Katharmoi,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 16, 1975, p. 347-357.
de Miro, Ernesto, “Società e arte nell'età di Empedocle,” Elenchos, 19/2, 1998, p. 325-344. (Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.]
Demulder, Bram, Plutarch’s cosmological ethics, Leuven: Leuven University Press 2022, (Plutarchea hypomnemata).
[B 17, B 76, B 115, B 122.]
Derenne, J-Ph., Debru, A., Grassino,A.E., Whitelaw, W.A., “The earliest History of diaphragm physiology,” European Respiratory Journal, 7, 1994, p. 2234-2240.
http://www.yogagardensf.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/diaphragm-1.pdf
http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/12/2234.long
http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/7/12/2234.full.pdf
[B 100.]
– “History of diaphragm physiology: the achievements of Galen,” European Respiratory Journal, 8, 1995, p. 154-160.
http://www.ersj.org.uk/content/8/1/154.full.pdf
de Rhoer, Jacobus, Porphyrii philosophi De abstinentia ab esu animalium libri quatuor cum notis ingeris Petri Victorii et Ioannis Valentini ... notas adiecit Iacobus de Rhoer, Trajecti ad Rhenum 1767.
[P. 139-140 et 152 (edition, translation and commentary of B 128), p. 161 (B 139) et p. 288 (B 124.2)].
Derome, Léa, Blood and cognition in Aristotle, Diss. Department of Philosophy McGill University December 2023.
[A 86, B 105.]
de Romilly, Jacqueline, “Gorgias et le pouvoir de la poésie,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 93, 1973, p. 155-162.
de Rubeis, Maria Grazia, “Ripetizioni nel ΠΕΡΙ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ di Empedocle,” Studi Classici e Orientali, 41, 1991, p. 87-93.
[B 17, B 20, B 26, B 71.]
de Sanctis, Dino, “La Musa πολυμνηστη: Penelope nella poetica di Empedocle (fr. 3 DK),” Studi Classici e Orientali, LIII, 2007 (published in 2010), p. 11-30.
[B 3.]
de Santoro Moreira, Fernando, José, “Αllégories et rondeaux philosophiques dans le Poème de la Nature d’Empédocle,” χώρα REAM, 11, 2013, p. 183‑200.
– “Empédocles, Aristóteles e os elementos,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6,12, 2012, p. 39-55. Released in October 2014.
[A 37, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 22, B 71, B 82, B 90, B 111, B 117.]
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1452/1293
Deschamps, Lucienne, “'Victrix Venus'. Varron et la cosmologie empédocléenne,” in: Beiträge zur altitalischen Geistesgeschichte: Festschrift für Gerhard Radke zum 18. Februar 1984, ed. R. Altheim-Stiehl & M. Rosenbach, Münster-Westfalen: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung 1986, p. 51-72.
– “Le chant V du De rerum natura de Lucrèce et Varron de Reate,” in: Vita Latina, 151, 1998, p. 6-18.
Desclos, Marie-Laurence, ‘Les Nuées : l'autre apologie de Socrate,’ in: Filosofia, storia, immaginario mitologico. Nuovi approcci, ed. E. Berardi, M.P. Catiglioni, M.-L. Desclos & P. Dolcetti, Alessandria (It.): Edizioni dell’Orso 2022, (Sophia, 3), p. 3-34.
[B 112.]
Deslauriers, Marguerite, Aristotle on sexual difference - Metaphysics, Biology, Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2022.
de Smet, Daniel, “The Influence of the Arabic Pseudo-Empedocles on medieval Latin philosophy: Myth or Reality?,” in: Across the Mediterranean frontiers: Trade, politics and religion 650-1450, ed. D. Agius & I. Netton, Turnhout 1997, p. 225-234.
– Empedocles Arabus. Une lecture néoplatonicienne tardive, (Koninklijke academie voor wetenschappen, letteren en schone kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren, 165) Brussel: Paleis der Academiën 1998.
[Cf. the reviews of S. I. Stroumsa,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 122, January 2002, p. 94-97; and J. Janssens,” Tijdschrift voor filosofie 63, 2001, p. 405-406.]
des Places, Edouard, La religion grecque, Paris: A et J. Picard 1969, p. 187-191.
[B 29, B 17, B 21, B 109, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 134.]
Despotopoulos [Δεσποτόπουλος], Konstantinos I., “Θέματα φιλοσοφίας του Εμπεδοκλέους,” Πρακτικα της Ακαδημίας Αθηνων, 67, 1992, p. 192-202.
[B 3.9-13, B 110 etc.]
– Φιλοσοφικά και διαλεκτικά: Μελετήματα, Θεσσαλονίκη 1990.
[Emp.: p. 80-87.]
Detienne, Marcel, “Xénocrate et la démonologie pythagoricienne,” Revue des Études Anciennes, 60, 3-4, 1958, p. 271-279.
– “La ‘démonologie’ d’Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 72, 1959, p. 1-17.
[B 21, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 126, B 146.]
– La notion de daïmôn dans le pythagorisme ancien, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1963. Reprint 2021, (Anagôgê, 14).
[The moon: p. 105-111, 140-144. Emp.: p. 79-85. B 111, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 129, B 146.]
– Les maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, Paris: F. Maspero 1967, (Textes à l'appui).
[B 4, B 23, B 110, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 132.]
Deussen, Paul, Die Philosophie der Griechen, Leipzig 1921, p. 106-124.
De Waele, Jozef Arthur, Acragas Graeca: Die historische Topographie des griechischen Akragas auf Sizielen, I. Historischer Teil, ’s-Gravenhage: 1971.
[P. 33, 204-205, p. 289: Taffel V. B 123.2.]
Dezeimeris, Jean-Eugène, “De quelques ouvrages retrouvés d’Empédocle, de Démocrite et de Diogène d’Apollonie,” Le Moniteur Universel, Paris 1846, coll. 1647c - 1648a, 1702b - 1703a, 1717c - 1718b
[The third part which concentrates only on Empedocles was published also in Séances et travaux de l’académie des sciences morales et politiques, 9, 1846, p. 199-224.]
Διαμαντόπουλος, Άρης, Οι Έλληνες Φιλόσοφοι και η Φυσική - 5ος Τόμος, Εμπεδοκλής, 2015. On-line.
Diano, Carlo, “Empedocle. L’eredità di Parmenide e dei Pitagorici, - Mitizzazione del principio del movimento - L’escatologia di Empedocle,” in: Il pensiero greco da Anassimandro agli stoici, Torino: Bollati Boringhieri 2007, (Series 1: Nuova cultura; 156), p. 72-76.
Diels, Hermann, (1873) “Critica,” in: Commentationes in honorem Francisci Buecheleri Hermanni Useneri editae a Societate Philologa Bonnensi, Bonnae 1873, p. 61-7, p. 65-66.
[B 42.]
– (1879) Doxographi Graeci, Collegit, recensuit, Prolegomenis Indicibusque instruxit Hermannus Diels, Berlin: G. Reimer 1879.
– (1880) “Studia Empedoclea,” Hermes, 15, 1880, p. 161-179.
[B 12, B 21.13-14, B 26.3-7, B 52, B 54, B 22, B 37, B 96, B 76, B 20, B 61, B 67, B 84, B 133, B 137, B 143.]
– (1884) “Gorgias und Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1884, 1, 19, p. 343-368.
[= in: Sophistik, ed. C. J. Classen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1976, p. 351-383; B 21, B 84.]
– (1890) Sibyllinische Blätter, Berlin: G. Reimer 1890.
[B 112, B 143.]
– (1894) “Pseudonaevianum,” Rheinisches Museum, 49, 1894, p. 478.
[B 121.2.]
– (1897) “Über ein Fragment des Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 49, 2, 1897, p. 1062-1073.
[B 142; published also separately as a Sonderabdruck of SPAW, 12 p. – Reprint in W. Burkert (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt 1969, p. 147-158.]
– (1898) “Über die Gedichte des Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 31, 1898, p. 396-415.
[Published also separately as a Sonderabdruck of SPAW, 20 p. – Reprint in W. Burkert (ed.), Hermann Diels. Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Darmstadt 1969, p. 127-146.]
– (1898) “Symbola Empedoclea,” in: Mélanges Henri Weil, Paris: A. Fontemoing 1898, p. 125-130.
[B 115.1, 4 et 5-7, B 143, B 61.]
– (1899) Elementum: Eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und lateinischen Thesaurus, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1899.
– (1901) Poetarum philosophorum fragmenta, Berlin: Weidmann 1901, (Poetarum graecorum fragmenta, III, 1).
[Emp.: p. 74-168; Reprint in Hildesheim: Weidmann 20002. [ + ].]
– (1921) Der antike Pessimismus, Berlin: E.S. Mittler & Sohn 1921, (Schule und Leben, 1).
– (1922) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Vierte Auflage. Erster Band, Berlin: Weidmann 19224 (19031; 19062; 19123).
[Band I, p. 193-283, and appendix p. XXX-XXXIII. [ + ].]
Diels, Hermann & Kranz, Walther, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Fünfte Auflage herausgegeben von Walther Kranz. Erster Band, Berlin: Weidmann 19345.
[Emp.: p. 276-375, without "Nachtrag" (however see in Band II, p. 419-424). = DK5.]
– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Griechisch und Deutsch von Hermann Diels. Herausgegeben von Walther Kranz. Erster Band, Berlin: Weidmann 19516.
[Reprint of 19345 with a "Nachtrag". Published by Weidmann in Berlin (Grunewald, and printing in Berlin-West SO 36 by Lindemann und Lüdecke) = DK6 or simply DK. Many reprints. Berlin: Weidmann 19547 [...] Zürich-Hildesheim: Weidmann 198918, 199219 etc. Emp.: p. 276-375 and 498-501. [ + ].]
– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band III (Wortindex von W. Kranz. Namen- und Stellenregister von H. Diels ergänzt von W. Kranz), Berlin: Weidmann 19375.
– Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Band III (Wortindex von Walther Kranz. Namen- und Stellenregister von H. Diels ergänzt von W. Kranz), Zürich-Hildesheim: Weidmann 19526.
[Many reprints. Band II is dated also 1952.]
Diès, Auguste, “L’évolution de la théologie dans les philosophes grecs III. D’Empédocle à Socrate,” Revue d’histoire et de littérature religieuses, 11, 1906, p. 320-352.
[Emp.: p. 325-335. General sketch of Emp. teaching which was heavily influenced by H. Diels. B 31, B 28, B 29, B 115, B 133, B 134, B 146, B 147.]
– Le cycle mystique : la divinité, origine et fin des existences individuelles dans la philosophie antésocratique, Paris: F. Alcan 1909, (Collection historique des grands philosophes).
[Emp.: p. 83-99. B 6, B 11, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 116, B 117, B 121, B 127, B 128, B 130, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 144, B 146, B 147.]
Dieterich, Albrecht, Nekyia: Beiträge zur Erklärung der neuentdeckten Petrusapokalypse, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1893.
[P. 119: B 115.6.]
Dietrich, Ernst Ludwig, “Der Urmensch als Androgyn,” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte, 58, dritte Folge IX, 3-4, 1939, p. 297-345.
[P. 299-301: Sphairos as an androgynous god: B 27, B 28, B 30, B 134; influence of Empedocles on Aristophanes’s speech in Plato’s Symposion.]
Di Giovanni, Piero, “L’Empedocle di Freud,” in: Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto 1989, p. 173-184.
[Edizioni G.B.M., Messina.]
– “Empedocle e le quattro radici del mondo,” in: P. Di Giovanni, La storia della filosofia nell’età classica : dal VII secolo a.C. al II secolo d.C., Milan: FrancoAngeli 2013, p. 125-134.
[B 6.]
Di Iulio, Erminia, “Gorgia e il materialismo empedocleo. Homologia, percezione e pensiero nel trattato sul Non Essere,” in: La natura corporea delle immagini, da Empedocleo a Lucrezio, ed. F. Aronadio, E. di Iulio & F. Masi, Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici 2022, p. 39-78.
Diller, Hans, “ΟΨΙΣ ΑΔΗΛΩΝ TA ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΑ,” Hermes, 67, 1, 1932, p. 14-42.
– “Προθέλυμνος,” Philologus, 97, 1948, p. 361-363.
[B 21.]
Dillon, John, “Review of Ancient philosophy, mystery and magic: Empedocles and the Pythagorean tradition by Peter Kingsley,” Hermathena, 164, 1998, p. 122-124.
– “Empedocles’ cosmic cycle in the later platonist tradition,” in: Agonistes: Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, ed. J. Dillon & M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 227-234. Reprint London-New York: Routledge 2017.
Di Marco, Massimo, “La metensomatosi in Empedocle,” Filosofia e società, 4, 1995, p. 31-58. Reimpr. in: M. Di Marco, Sapienza italica: studi su Senofane, Empedocle, Ippone, Roma: Edizioni Studium 1998, (Quaderni della Libera Università "Maria SS. Assunta" Lumsa - Roma, 13), p. 33-68.
Di Pasquale Barbanti, Maria, “Empedocle in Plotino e in Porfirio,” Invigilata Lucernis, 22, 2000, p. 31-45.
[A 37, ad B 1154, ad B 1202, B 120, ad B 1172, B 126, B 129.]
Disandro, Carlos Alberto, Filosofía y poesía en el pensar griego. Anaxágoras, Empédocles, Demócrito, La Plata: Hosteria Volante 1974.
[B2, B 3, B 35, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 134.]
Ditadi, Gino, “Orfeo, Pitagora, Empedocle,” in: Teofrasto, Della Pietà, ed. Gino Ditadi, Este (Padua): Isonomia 2005, p. 61-91, (Bibliophilia).
Dixsaut, Monique, “L’Empedocle di Nietzsche,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 310-330.
Dodds, Eric, Robertson, The Greeks and the irrational, Berkeley: The Regents of the University of California 1951, (Sather Classical Lectures, 25).
[Emp.: p. 145-156, 173-174.]
– Les Grecs et l’irrationnel, traduit de l’anglais par M. Gibson, Paris: Flammarion 1977, (Champs, 28).
[Emp.: p. 149-158, p. 173-176.]
Dolce, Lodovico, “Empedocle philosopho,” in: Lodovico Dolce, Terzetti per le “Sorti” : poesia oracolare nell’officina di Francesco Marcolini. edition and commentary by Paolo Procaccioli, Treviso: Fondazione Benetton studi ricerche; Roma: Viella 2006, (Ludica; 6), p. 181 (XXIX).
[See also F. Marocolini, Le ingeniose sorti, Venice 1550, p. 52.]
Dombrowski, Daniel A., The philosophy of vegetarianism, Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press 1984.
[Empedocles, p. 2, 21-22, 25, 32, 53, 55, 86, 90, 96, 99, 146. B 117, B 128, B 139.]
D’Onofrio, Stevo, L’unità del pensiero empedocleo alla luce del Papiro di Strasburgo (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1665), Tesi di laurea in Storia della filosofia Antica, Trieste a. a., 1998-99.
Dorandi, Tiziano, “Gli studi Ercolanesi,” in: Hermann Diels (1848-1922) et la science de l’Antiquité, Vandœuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt 1999, (Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, 45), p. 227-260, p. 239-242.
[B 2.1, B 100.1-2, B 142.]
– “Qualche considerazione di metodo,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 197-203.
[“we” in Pap. Strasb., B 115.3-4, B 134.]
– Diogenes Laertius. Lives of eminent philosophers, edited with introduction by T. D., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 50).
– (ed.), Porphyre. L’antre des nymphes dans l’Odyssée, Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin 2019, (Histoire des doctrines de l’Antiquité classique, 52).
[B 120: p. 122.]
– Stobaeana. Tradizione manoscritta e storia del testo dei primi due libri dell’Antologia di Giovanni Stobeo, Baden-Baden: Academia 2023, (Diotima. Studies in Greek Philology, 9).
[B 6, B 28, B 36.]
Döring, August, “Das Weltsystem des Empedokles,” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 105, 1895, p. 29-45.
[A 30, A 49, A 50, A 53, A 54, A 561, A 58, A 59 etc.]
– Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Gemeinverständlich nach den Quellen, I, Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1903.
[Emp.: p.197-216.]
Dowdy, S. M., “The bronze sandal, or a defense of cosmic refusal,” Political Theology, 25, 2, 2024, p. 124-129.
Drozdek, Adam, (2003) “Empedocles’ Theology,” Myrtia, 18, 2003, p. 5-20.
http://revistas.um.es/myrtia/article/viewFile/36741/35271
http://interclassica.um.es/var/plain/storage/original/application/641f8149a020b062d41adc23f04044e3.pdf.
[B 134.]
– (2007) Greek philosophers as theologians: the divine arche, Aldershot (UK)-Burlington (VT): Ashgate 2007.
[P. 71-83, Chap. 6: Empedocles and the holy phren. Elements and forces, harmony, chance and necessity, god, immortality. B 134.]
– (2008) In the beginning was the apeiron: infinity in Greek philosophy, Stuttgart: F. Steiner 2008, (Palingenesia, 94).
[Chapter 7: p. 57-60. B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 39, B 98, B 112, B 135.]
– (2011) Athanasia: afterlife in Greek philosophy, Hildesheim - Zürich - New York, NY: Olms 2011. (Spudasmata, 137).
[Chapter 8: Empedocles; 8.1 The soul, 8.2 Blood, 8.3 The daimôn, 8.4 The body, 8.5 Immortality, p 125-142. A 78, A 85, A 86, B 2, B 17, B 21, B 59, B 98, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 117, B 128, [B 134], B 138, B 141, B 146, B 147.]
Drvota, Tomáš & Tomáš Vítek, “Parménide DK 28 B 16 : un fragment méconnue [sic] d’Empédocle ? Part I : Parménide,” Eirene, 56, 1-2, 2020, p.179-240.
[B 108, B 106, B 103, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 134, B 8, B 110.]
DuBose, L. Shannon, Aristotle’s doctrine of elements, University of South Carolina, 1974, (The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter, 78).
https://orb.binghamton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=sagp
http://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/78
Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques, “D’Anaximandre à Empédocle: Contacts gréco-iraniens,” in: Atti del convegno sul tema: La Persia e il mondo greco-romano. Roma 11. - 14. Aprile 1965, ed. A. Pagliano, Roma: Accademia Nazionale di Lincei 1966, p. 423-431.
Duminil, Marie-Paule, Le Sang, les vaisseaux, le cœur, dans la collection hippocratique, anatomie et physiologie, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1983.
[P. 216 & 247: B 98; p. 23: B 150; p. 270-272: B 100; p. 309: B 105.]
Dümmler, Ferdinand, Akademika, Beiträge zur Litteraturgeschichte der sokratischen Schulen, Giessen: J. Ricker'sche Buchhandlung 1889, p. 216-241.
[There are two worlds and two zoogonies; the zoogony of the Strife is documented with A 30, B 62, A 85 and A 70.]
– “Zur orphischen Kosmologie,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 7, 1894, p. 147-153.
[Emp. and Orphismus; a critical reaction to Kern, AGPh 1, 1888, B 134.]
Dumont, Jean-Paul, “Empédocle,” in: Les Présocratiques, édition établie par Jean-Paul Dumont avec la collaboration de Daniel Delattre et de Jean-Louis Poirier, Paris: Gallimard 1988, (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade), p. 319-439, plus end notes p. 1294-1331.
[[+ +]. Reprint in Collection Folio Essais, Gallimard, 1991, under the title Les Écoles Présocratiques, p. 127-247, plus end notes p. 792-824.]
Dumoulié, Camille, “Empédocle ou le pathos de l’Harmonie (au Ve siècle avant J.-C),” Critique, 49 (Nr. 553-554), 1993 (juin-juillet), p. 357-371.
[Popular, antiquated and literary orientated sketch of Emp. teaching with some superficial parallels with Freud, Hölderlin, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Lacan; useless for Empedoclean studies.]
Düntzer, Heinrich, “Schedae criticae,” Archiv für Philologie und Pädagogik, 5, 1837, p. 205-211.
[P. 208. ὑπόξυλον and λιπόξυλον - B 71.1.]
Duprat, Guillaume Léonce, Quomodo apud Aristotelem in ejus. De Anima doctrina. Empedocles et Hippocrates auctoritate contenderint cum Platone, Lutetiae Parisiorum: A. Fontemoing 1898.
Dupuis, Jean (transl.), Théon de Smyrne, philosophe platonicien. Exposition des connaissances mathématiques utiles pour la lecture de Platon, traduite pour la première fois du grec au français par J. D., Paris: Hachette 1892.
[B. 121.1, B 143.]
Durić [Đjurić], Miloš N., “Etička shvatanja u Empedokla i Anaksagore,” Živa antika, 6, 1, 1956, p. 93-118.
[Empedokles und Anaxagoras als Ethiker.]
– “Empedokle i načelo koegzistencije,” Savremenik, 10, Januar, 1964, p. 179-187.
– Istorija helenske etike, Beograd: Zavod za izdavanije udžbenika 1961 (19672, 19973), p. 146-162. (= ŽA 6, 1956, p. 93-118).
Dyer, Robert, “Empedocles fr. 64 (Plut. Quaest. Nat. 21. 917 C),” Mnemosyne, 27, 1974, p. 175-176.
[B 64.]
Ebbesen, Sten, “Boethius as an Aristotelian scholar,” in: Aristoteles. Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet, 2, Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben, Berlin - New York: De Gruyter 1987, p. 286-311.
[P. 309-311: an account of Empedocles found in a scholium in MS Laur. gr. 72,15, folio 22, a 13th-century codex of Aristotle’s Categories. This account is taken up in Primavesi 2008b, Janko 2010, Primavesi 2011 as 65 R, p. 460.]
Ebert, Theodor, “A Presocratic philosopher behind the ‘Phaedrus’: Empedocles,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, XI, 2, 1993, p. 211-227.
– “The theory of recollection in Plato’s Meno”: against a myth of Platonic scholarship,” in: Brisson Erler (ed.), Gorgias – Menon. Selected Papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, ed. Erler M. & L. Brisson, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2007, (International Plato Studies, 25), p. 184-198.
[A 92, B 8, B 15, B 117, B 129, B 146.]
Eckerman, Chris, “Venus as Epicurean nature: Lucretius' Empedocles at De rerum natura 1.1-9,” Eranos, 113, 2022, p. 99-118.
Edinger, Edward, F. & Wesley, Deborah A., The psyche in Antiquity. Book one, Early Greek philosophy, From Thales to Plotinus, Toronto: Innercity Books 1999.
[Studies in jungian psychology by jungian analysts. Emp.: p. 46-53.]
Edmonds, Radcliffe, G., Myths of the underworld journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the 'Orphic' Gold Tablets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
Edwards, Mark J., “Lucretius, Empedocles and Epicurean polemics,” Antike und Abendland, 35, 1989, p. 104-115.
[B 6, B 17, B 105, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 129.]
– “A late use of Empedocles: The oracle on Plotinus,” Mnemosyne, 43, 1990, p. 151-155.
– “Being and Seeming: Empedocles’ Reply,” Hermes, 119/3, 1991, p. 282-293.
Egleston Robbins, Frank, “The creation story in Ovid Met. I,” Classical Philology, 8, 4, 1913, p. 401-414. [Four elements, B 38, B 27. The text reads fr. 8 but it is a misprint for fr. 38, and to be precise fr. 38.4 with Titan = sun.]
Egorov (Yegorov), A. S., (2007) “Empedokl i problema gretcheskogo chamanizma,” Voprosy Filosofii., 2007, 8, p 97-105.
See abstract (in French) on page:
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov
[= Empedocles and a problem of the Greek shamanism. B 111; B 128.]
– (2009) “K voprosou o lokalizatsii potoustoronnego mira ou Empedokla,” in: Opuscula cathedrae linguarum antiquarum. Fasc. II. Moscow, 2009, p. 72-81.
See abstract (in French) on page:
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov
[= The question of the location of the Other World in Empedocles. B 115; B 118; B 121; B 128.]
– (2010) “Empedokl na Etne,” Aristeas: Philologia classica et historia antiqua, II, 2010, p. 15-25.
See abstract (in French) on page:
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/alexander-egorov
[B 126; B 128; В 151 DK.]
Einarson, Benedict, & De Lacy, Philipp, “The manuscript tradition of Plutarch Moralia 548A-612B,” Classical Philology, 46, 2, 1951, p. 93-110.
[De exilio, B 115.]
– Plutarch’s Moralia, XIV, 1086 C - 1147 A, London: W. Heinemann 1967, Cambridge (Ma): Harvard University Press 1986, (Loeb, 428).
[B 8, B 9, B 10, B 11, B 15.]
Eisler, Robert, “Bildopfer bei Empedokles,” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 13, 4, 1910, p. 625-626.
[B 128.4-5.]
Eitrem, Samuel, “Die vier Elemente in der Mysterienweihe,” Symbolae osloenses, 4, 1926, p. 39-59, and Symbolae osloenses, 5, 1927, p. 39-59.
[B 115.9-12.]
Elbert Decker, Jessica, “I will tell a double tale: double speak in the ancient Greek poetic tradition,” Epoché, 25, 2, 2021, p. 237-248.
[B 17.]
– “The way up and down: liminal agency in the Homeric hymns and Presocratic philosophy,” in: The Routledge handbook of women and ancient Greek philosophy, ed. S. Brill & C. McKeen, New York-Abingdon: Taylor & Francis 2024.
Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Jennifer Ferriss-Hill & Heather L. Reid (ed.), Empedocles in Sicily, Siracusa (Sicily)-Dakota Dunes (SD): Parnassos Press 2024, (The Heritage of Western Greece, 12).
[Fonte Aretusa Organization, Exedra Mediterranean Center in Siracusa. – The book in digital version, with some minor corrections and with Index, is available free from JSTOR – A 1, A 2, A 72, A 86, A 97, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 24, B 35, B 39, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 84, B 98, B 100, B 105, B 110, B 111, B 115, B 117, B 119, B 129, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 146, B 147 B 152.]
Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Matthew Mayock, “Parmenides and Empedocles,” in: The Cambridge handbook of Western Mysticism and Esotericism, ed. G. A. Magee, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 26-37.
[Influenced by P. Kingsley.]
Ellis, Robinson, “Some suggestions on Diels’ Poetarum Philosophorum Fragmenta,” The Classical Review, 16, 5, 1902, p. 269-270.
[B 3.9-11, B 17.20-1 and 25, B 64.]
El Murr, Dimitri, “Friendship in early Greek ethics,” in: Early Greek Ethics, ed. D. C. Wolfsdorf, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020, p. 566-592.
[B 6, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 71, B 96.]
– “Platonic ‘desmology’ and the body of the world animal (Tim. 30c–34a),” in: Cosmology and biology in ancient philosophy: from Thales to Avicenna, ed. R. Salles, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021, p. 46-71.
Emlyn-Jones, Chris, “Brief review of M. R. Wright, The extant fragments, 1981, & D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 105, 1985, p. 183.
Emminger, Alphons, “Empedokles,” in: Die vorsoktratischen Philosophen nach den Berichten des Aristoteles, Würzburg: A. Stuber 1878, p. 55-66, 148-162.
Emperius, Adolf, Opuscula philologica et historica amicorum studio collecta, ed. F. G. Schneidewin, Gottingae 1847, p. 287.
[B 40.]
English, Robert B., “Empedoclean Psychology,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American philological Association, 45, 1914, p. xvi.
Enos, Richard Leo, “Aristotle, Empedocles, and the notion of Rhetoric,” in: In search of justice. The Indiana tradition in speech communication, ed. Jensen, R.J. & Hammerback J.C., Amsterdam: Rodopi 1987, p. 5-21.
[A 1.]
– Greek rhetoric before Aristotle, Revised and expanded edition, Anderson (South Carolina): Parlor Press 2012, (Lauer series in rhetoric and composition).
[V. Significant Contributors to Sicilian Rhetoric, Empedocles and the emergence of the sicilian sophistic, p. 110-142.]
Erhardt-Siebold, Erika von, “The Anglo-Saxon riddle 74 and Empedokles fragment 117,” in: Medium Aevum, 15, 1946, p. 48-54.
[B 115, B 117.]
Erler, M., “Hermarch,” in: Die Philosophie der Antike, Band I/1: Die hellenistische Philosophie, ed. H. Flashar, Basel: Schwabe 1994, p. 227-234
– ‘Empedokles (31 DK)’, in: B. Zimmermann (ed.), Handbuch der griechischen Literatur der Antike. Erster Band: Die Literatur der archaischen und klassischen Zeit, Munich: C. H. Beck 2011, p. 277-280.
Erro María Guadalupe, Problemas aspectuales del aoristo y su aplicación a la lectura de los filósofos presocráticos, Diss. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 2013.
Estienne (or Stephanus), Henri (Henricus) II, Plutarchi Chaeronensis quae extant opera, cum latina interpretatione. Ex vetustis codicibus plurima nunc primum emendata sunt, ut ex Henr. Sephani annotationibus intelleges […] Variorum Plutarchi scriptorum tomus secundus, Geneva: 1572.
http://www.e-rara.ch/
[Greek. B 115, Page 1077: Empedocles in De exilio.]
– Poesis philosophica, vel saltem reliquiae poesis philosophicae, Empedoclis, Parmenidis, Xenophanis ..., item Heracliti et Democriti loci quidam et eorum epistolae, Geneva: 1573.
[Emp. in Latin: p. 11. Emp. in Greek: p. 17-31, p. 203-208. Notes by J. Scaliger: p. 216.]
– Plutarchi Chaeronensis quae exstant omnia, cum latina interpretatione Hermanni Cruserij: Gulielmi Xylandri, et doctorum virorum notis, et libellis variantum lectionum, et indicibus accuratis, Francfort: Wechel 1599.
[Emp. B 115: p. 607 of Tome 2.]
Etienne, Alexandre & Dominic O' Meara, La philosophie épicurienne sur pierre. Les fragments de Diogène d'Œnoanda, Introduction, traduction et notes par A. Etienne et D. O’Meara, Fribourg (Swiss): Éditions Universitaires, Paris: Éditions du Cerf 1996, (Vestigia, 20).
[Emp. fr. 6 Smith, fr. 41 Smith, fr. 42 Smith.]
Evangelisti, Florestano, The concept of matter: a journey from Antiquity to quantum physics, Springer, 2023, (History of Physics).
ΕΥΑΓΓΕΛΙΔΕΣ, Μαργαρίτης, Ἱστορία τῆς θεωρίας τῆς γνώσεως, Athens 1885.
http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/?ln=fr
http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/1.pdf?version=1
http://invenio.lib.auth.gr/record/122439/files/5.pdf?version=1
[Empedocles: p. 75-79.]
Eyselein, K., “Symbolgehalt antiker Kosmologien,” Der altsprachliche Unterricht, 27/5, 1984, p. 50-64.
Fabre-Serris, Jacqueline, “La réception d’Empédocle dans la poésie latine : Virgile (Buc. 6), Lucrèce, Gallus et les poètes élégiaques,” Dictynna, 11, 2014.
http://dictynna.revues.org/1045
– “Enjeux moraux et idéologiques des usages d’Empédocle au livre XV des Métamorphoses : une réponse d’Ovide à Virgile (Énéide VI et VIII),” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 303-319.
[B 129, B 132, B 130.]
– “L’extension du domaine de l’Amour (Mét. 1.452-73 et 5.346-84): deux moments clefs dans l’épos ‘empédocléen’ d’Ovide et leur précédent dans les Amours 1.1,” Φιλοσοφία, 52, 2022, p. 392-410.
[This article was published in 2024. Φιλία and Νεῖκος. Love and Strife. B 61, B 115.]
Fabricius, Joannes Albertus, Empedoclis Sphaera, Hamburgi 1705.
[B 161.]
– Bibliotheca Graeca sive notitia scriptorum veterum Graecorum, Hamburgi 17183 (Sumptu F. Liebezeit 17051)
[P. 473-477: Empedocles’ biography and the list and the content of his supposed treatises.]
– Sexti Empirici opera graece et latine. Pyrrhoniarum institutionum libri iii cum Henr. Setphani versione et notis. Contra mathematicos sive Disciplinarum professores libri vi. Contra prilosophos libri V cum versione Gentiani Hervetii ... Emendavit supplevitque et toti operi notas addidit Jo. Albertus Fabricius, Lipsiae : Sumptu Joh. Friderici Gleditschii B. filii 1718.
Faggi, A[dolfo?], “Empedocle d’Agrigento e l’età dell’odio,” Marzocco, 46, 1919.
Fairbanks, Arthur, “On Plutarch’s quotations from the early Greek philosophers,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 28, 1897, p. 75-87.
– The First Philosophers of Greece: An edition and translation of the remaining fragments of the pre-Sokratic philosophers, together with a translation of the more important accounts of their opinions contained in the early epitomes of their works, London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trübner (also: New York: Charles Scribner’s sons), 1898, p. 157-234. [ + ]
http://history.hanover.edu/texts/presoc/emp.htm
– “Repetitions in Empedocles,” The Classical Review, 12, 1898, p. 16-17.
Fairweather, Jane A., “Fiction in the Biographies of the Ancient Writers,” Ancient Society, 5, 1974-1975, p. 231-275.
Fallas López, Luis Alberto, “Mejor nosotros que otros. Empédocles en primera plural,” Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 62, 164, 2023, p. 63-79.
[a(i)6, B 17, B 26, B 147.]
Falter, Otto, Der Dichter und sein Gott bei den Griechen und Römern, Diss. Würzburg, Würzburg: K. Triltsch 1934.
[P. 40: B3.]
Faraone, Christopher A., “Gli incantesimi esametrici ed i poemi epici nella Grecia antica,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, New Series, 84, 3, 2006, p. 11-24.
– Women and children first: the earliest evidence for ancient Greek body Amulets. Budapest: Phoibos 2019, (István Hahn Lecturers, 7).
– “Empedocles the Sorcerer and his hexametrical Pharmaka,” Antichthon, 53, 2019, p. 14-32.
[B 111, B 112.]
Farina, Antonio, Amore e Odio in Empedocle, Caserta 1948.
Farnell, Lewis Richard, The Cults of the Greek states, I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896.
[B 6, Hera, earth, and critics, p.181-195.]
Farrell, Joe, “Looking for Empedocles in Latin poetry: A skeptical approach,” Dictynna, 11, 2014.
[http://dictynna.revues.org/1063]
Fausti, Daniela, “Su alcuni problemi empedoclei,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa,10, 1980, p. 363-382.
[B 111.]
Fedorova, Olga (Фёдорова, Ольга, Борисовна), “Четыре элемента Эмпедокла: текстологический анализ фрагментов,” in: Вопро́сы исто́рии естествозна́ния и те́хники, 26, 2, 2005, p. 18-65.
https://vietmag.org/s0205-96060000622-1-1-ru-329/
[B 6, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 38, B 57, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 117.]
– ‘Роль теории смешения в представлениях о цвете у Эмпедокла, Демокрита, Платона,’ in: История науки в философском контексте, СПб., 2007.
– «Играющее дитя», или фрагмент Эмпедокла о дыхании в свете филологического анализа, in: Вестник Московского университете, 7 Философия, 2, 2010, p. 3-34.
[B 100.]
Fefilio, Nicarno (= G. B. Corniani?), Saggio sopra Luciano, osia Quadro d’antichi e di moderni Costumi, Bassani/Venetiis 1789.
[non vidi.]
Fehling, Detlev, Die Wiederholungsfiguren und ihr Gebrauch bei den Griechen vor Gorgias, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co 1969.
Felisi, Claudio, “L’exégèse allégorique du mythe du « partage du monde » (Schol. vet. ad Il. XV, 192-193 bT) : un nouveau fragment des questions homériques de Porphyre ?,” Revue des études grecques, 1 (137), 2024, p. 41-83.
[B 6.]
Ferella, Chiara, (2011) L’ampia Natura di Empedocle, Diss., Università di Pisa, 2011.
http://etd.adm.unipi.it/theses/available/etd-11052011-145844/unrestricted/Empoedocle_ampiaNatura.pdf
– (2013) “Empedocle, il giorno spietato e l’esilio dagli dei: a proposito di alcuni frammenti ‘demonologici’,” in: Origini e svolgimento del pensiero greco: studi per Jean-Pierre Vernant, ed. R. Di Donato, Pisa: ETS 2013, (Anthropoi. Studi e materiali di antropologia storica del mondo antico, 8), p. 29-47.
[B 112, B 115, B 117, B 119, B. 126, B 127, B 146, B 147.]
– (2018) “'A path for understanding': Journey metaphors in (three) early Greek philosophers,” in: Chiara Ferella & Cilliers Breytenbach (ed.), Paths of knowledge: Interconnection(s) between knowledge and journey in the Greco-Roman world, Berlin: edition Topoi 2018, p. 47-73, (Berlin Studies of the Ancient World, 60).
[Emp.: p. 60-70, B 3, B 110.]
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/23808/bsa_060_04.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
– (2019) Abstract of « The interaction between mind and soul in Empedocles’ philosophy », Session/Paper number 46.1, The Society for Classical Studies; 149th annual meeting abstracts; January 4-7, 2018, Boston, MA, printed in Pythagoras foundation, newsletter, 24, Mars 2019, p. 16-17.
https://classicalstudies.org/annual-meeting/149/abstract/interaction-between-mind-and-soulempedocles%E2%80%99-philosophy
https://www.stichting-pythagoras.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/N24-NEWSLETTER-24-2019-voll.pdf
– (2019) “Empedocles and the birth of trees: Reconstructing P.Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-6, Ens. d-f 10B-18,” The Classical Quarterly (online 20 August 2019, p. 1-12), 69, 1, 2019, p. 75-86.
[A 70, B 62, B 72, B 79, ensemble d–f.]
– (2020) “Early Greek medical metaphors and the question of deliberateness,” in: Drawing attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities, ed. C. Di Biase-Dyson - M. Egg, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2020, p. 131-161, (Figurative Thought and Language, 5).
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.5.06fer
[B 84, B 100.]
– (2020) “War steers the world: the metaphor domain of conflict in Heraclitus’ and Empedocles’ representations of the cosmos,” Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption, 30, 2020, p. 9-34.
[Akan, 30, ed. J. Althoff, S. Föllinger & G. Wöhrle. Emp.: p. 20-29. ‘Empedocles’ Strife as a principle of generation’, ‘Strife and the origin of the world’, ‘Moral and religious implications in Empedocles’ use of the military metaphor’. B 23, B 62, B 115.]
– (2021) “The Byzantine scholia to Aristotle and Empedocles’ cosmic cycle,” Mnemosyne, 2020, p. 1-23, (ahead of print, online), Mnemosyne, 74, 6, 2021, p. 978-1000.
– (2021) “The zoogonies of Empedocles reconsidered,” Rhizomata, 9, 1, 2021, p. 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2021-0001
[A 72, B 17, B 26, B 62, a(ii), c, d-f.]
– (2022) “Cosmic emotions; or, why is the universe joyful according to Plato’s Timaeus and Empedocles?,” Aestimatio, ns 3.2, 2022, p.13–46.
[B 2, B 6, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 62, B 98, B 105, B 109, B 115, B 118, B 119, B 124, B 132, B 134, B 141, B 146, B 147.]
– (2023) “Review of Tom Wellmann, Die Entstehung der Welt. Studien zum Straßburger Empedokles-Papyrus, 2020,” Philosophical Papyri, 1, 2023, p. 185-190.
– (2024) Reconstructing Empedocles’ thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2024.
[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 106, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 126, B 127, B 128, B 129, B 130, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 146, B 147, P.Strasb. a(ii), d-f.]
Ferguson, John, “Two Notes on the Preplatonics,” Phronesis, 9, 2, 1964, p. 98-106.
[Chap. 1, Empedocles DK 31 A 30, p. 98-101; A 30, A 60, A 61, B 45.]
– “ΔΙΝΟΣ,” Phronesis, 16, 1971, p. 97-115.
Fernández Fernández, Alvaro, “Neologismos Caldaicos (I). Notas sobre καναχισμός, ἀείπολος, προπόρευμα, μηναῖος y ἐπιβήτης,” Les Études classiques, 86, 3-4, 2018, p. 311-356.
Fernández Rivero, María Cecilia, “Eros, visión y conocimiento: la concepción empedoclea transpuesta en los diálogos platónicos. Eros, vision and knowledge: Empedocle’s concepts transposed to Plato’s dialogues,” Praesentia, 16, 2015, p. 1-18.
[B 17, B 21, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 136.]
Ferrari, Sante, (1891) Empedocle, Rome: Tipografia delle Terme Diocleziane di Giovanni Balbi 1891.
[This work is a reprinting of the following two items. [+ +].]
– (1891) “Empedocle, i frammenti del poema tradotti,” La Biblioteca delle Scuole Italiana, 13, 1891, p. 199-200, and La Biblioteca delle Scuole Italiana,14, p. 215-220.
– (1891) “Empedocle,” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia, 1/6, 1891, p. 165-190 and “La Filosofia di Empedocle,” Rivista Italiana di Filosofia, 2/6, 1891, p. 52-79 and p. 250-293.
– (1892) “La filosofia nella magna Grecia dopo Empedocle,” Atti e Memorie della R. Accademia di Scienze Lettere ed Arti in Padova, 8/293, 1891-2, p. 113-151.
[This article was published separately under the same title by Randi, Padua 1892.]
Ferwerda, Rein, Empedokles. Aarde, lucht, water en vuur. Vertaald en toegelicht door Rein Ferwerda, Amsterdam: Athenaeum – Polak & Van Gennep 1997, (Baskerville serie). Reprint in 2006 (Budel: Damon Publisher).
[All Greek fragments mainly edited by DK (see differences p. 129), with translation and a few comments. The order and numbering of the fragments are Ferwerda’s. Translation of some Testimonia. B 6, on 4 elements of Emp., reviewed by: Beullens, P., Tijdschrift voor filosofie.70, 2, 2008, p 408.]
Feshbach, Sidney, “Empedocles: The phenomenology of the four elements in literature,” in: Poetics of the elements in the human condition: part 2. The airy elements in poetic imagination, ed. A. T. Tymieniecka, Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988, p. 9-63, (Analecta Husserliana, 23).
[B 2, B 6, B 24, B 29, B 35, B 111, B 117, B 126, B 129, B 146.]
Festugière, André Jean, “Le sens philosophique du mot αἰών. À propos d’Aristote, De Caelo I, 9,” La Parola del passato, 4, 1949, p. 172-189. Reprint in Festugière, A. J., Études de philosophie grecque, Paris: Vrin 1971, p. 254-271.
[B 6, B 7, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 26, Β 27, Β 30, Β 31, B 110, B 129.]
Fialho, Maria do Céu, “Review of Rossetti L & Santaniello C., Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, 2004,” Humanitas, 57, 2005, p. 468-470.
Filée, John, “The Strasbourg Collection of Empedocles,” Études classiques, 67, 1999, p. 273-274;
[Review of Martin - Primavesi, 1999.]
Finkelberg, Aryeh, “Xenophanes’ physics, Parmenides’ doxa and Empedocles’ theory of cosmogonical mixture,” Hermes, 125.1, 1997, p. 1-16.
– “On the History of the Greek ΚΟΣΜΟΣ,” Harvard Studies in classical Philology, 98, 1998, p. 103-136. [B 26.5, B 134.]
– Heraclitus and Thales’ conceptual scheme: A historical study, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2017, (Jerusalem Studies in Religion and Culture, 23).
[Plut. De esu carn. i, 996C1, Censorin. DN iv 7 [28 A 51], B 31, B 44, B 26.5, B 52, B 110, B 112.4, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 120, B 121, B 126, B 134.5, B 148.]
Fino, Antonello, “La fontana arcaica di San Biagio ad Agrigento,” in: Il restauro dei monumenti antichi. Problemi strutturali: esperienze e prospettive, Atti delle Giornate di Studio, Agrigento, 23-24 novembre, 2012, ed. M. Livadiotti & M.C. Parello, Thiasos, 3, 2, 2014, p. 67-91.
[Nestis?]
Flashar, Hellmut, “Empedokles, frgm. B 111 und seine Stellung im Lehrgedicht über die Natur,” in: Actes de la XIIe conférence internationale d’études classiques, 1975, p. 547-551.
Fleet, Barrie, Simplicius. On Aristotle, Physics 2, translated by B. F., London-New Delhi - New York - Sydney: Bloomsbury 2014, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle).
[First published in 1997 by Gerald Duckworth. Simplicius p. 259.1 - 393.1; B 50, B 53, B 61, B 62, B 75, B 85, B 96, B 98, B 103, B 104.]
– Plotinus. Ennead IV.8. On the descent of the soul into bodies. Translation, with an introduction, and commentary, Las Vegas-Zurich- Athens: Parmenides Publishing 2012, (The Enneads of Plotinus with philosophical commentaries).
[B 115.]
Flores Rivas, María. Anima animalis: el alma de los animales en la Grecia arcaica. Madrid: Abada 2023.
– “All that glitters is not gold: the role of animals in the golden age through Greek texts,” New Classicists, 11, 2024, p. 4-28.
[B 128, B 130.]
Föllinger, Sabine, “Aristoteles’ Auseinandersetzung mit Empedokles in De generatione animalium,” in: Rezeptionen der Vorsokratiker von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart, ed. O. Hellmann, & B. Strobel, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2022, (Philosophie der Antike, 42), p. 87-102.
Forcignanò, Filippo, “Empedocle di Agrigento e Filistione di Locri,” in: Storia della filosofia antica, I, Dalle origini a Socrate, ed. M. Bonazzi, Roma: Carocci 2016, (Frecce 209), p. 139-148.
– “‘Ponderare con cura fra i singoli sensi’. Alcune riflessioni sulla percezione in Empedocle,” in: La natura corporea delle immagini, da Empedocleo a Lucrezio, ed. F. Aronadio, E. di Iulio & F. Masi, Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici 2022, p. 11-37.
Förster, Aurel, “Empedocleum,” Hermes, 74, 1939, p. 102-104.
[B 84.8.]
Fóti, Véronique, Marion, Epochal discordance: Hölderlin’s philosophy of tragedy, Albany (NY): State University of New York Press 2006, (SUNY Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy).
[Emp.: p. 29-63.]
– “Empedocles’s philosophy of nature as mandating non-violence,” in: Values and Justice in the Global Era, ed. Kostas Boudouris, Athens: Ionia Publications 2007, p. 91-102.
Fraisse, Jean-Claude, Philia: La notion d’amitié dans la philosophie antique, essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé, J. Vrin: Paris 1974, p. 84-87.
[Emp. philia was allegedly confined to be a cosmological conception and had not any anthropologic and emotional meaning but even in the cosmology Empedocles was not able to contribute essentially to the history of the term.]
Fränkel, Hermann, (1923) “Homerische Wörter,” Ἀντίδωρον.·Festschrift Jacob Wackernagel [...] gewidmet von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1923, p. 274-282.
[B. 2.6-9, ad B 3, B 134.]
– (1938) “A thought pattern in Heraclitus,” American Journal of Philology, 59/3, 1938, p. 309-337.
[P. 325, n. 35: B 2.2 and B 110.]
– (1946) “Man’s “ephemeros” nature according to Pindar and Others,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American philological Association, 77, 1946, p. 131-145.
[B 2.2-4, B 131.1.]
– (1948) “Zur ‘Discordia’ des Ennius,” Philologus, 97 (N.S. 51), 1948, p. 354.
[B 17.27; refusal of Norden’s theory on Ennius’ interpretation of Empedocles.]
Franz, Michael, “Das Farbengleichnis des Empedokles,” in: M. Franz, Von Gorgias bis Lukrez: antike Ästhetik und Poetik als vergleichende Zeichentheorie, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1999, (Literatur Forshung), p. 85-97.
[A 34, A 43, A 44, A 57, A 86, A 87, A 92, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 109.]
Freeman, Edward Augustus, The history of Sicily from the earliest times I-IV, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1891-1894.
[II, p. 342-356. A1, B 111, B 112.]
Freeman, Kathleen, The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. A Companion to Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford: Blackwell 1946.
[Second edition: Cambridge [Ma]: Harvard University Press 1959. In fact, what is called “second edition” is a reprint. In 1946 and in 1959 see Emp.: p. 172-204. [+ +].]
– Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers: a complete translation of the fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1948. Reprint at Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press 199624.
[Emp.: p. 51-69. [.+.].]
Frenkian, Aram M., Études de philosophie présocratique, II : La philosophie comparée, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Parménide d’Élée, Paris: J. Vrin 1937.
[P. 46-61. B 8, B 109, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 134, B 62, B 110, B 100, B 84.]
– “Theophrast De Sensu Kap. 10,” Philologus, 107, 1963, p. 313.
[A 86, par. 10.]
Frère, Jean, “Le cosmos d’Empédocle et le triomphe de la vie autour de l’usage répétitif des formules-images,” ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ (Athènes), 30, 2000, p. 231-234.
– “Trois penseurs présocratiques : Héraclite, Parménide, Empédocle,” Les Annales de l’Académie d’Alsace, 68, 2002, p. 76-86.
[B 16, B 17, B 27, B 28, B 29.]
– “Les dieux d’Élée et d’Agrigente,” in: Agonistes: Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, ed. J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. 3-12. Reprint London-New York: Routledge 2017.
[A 32, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 134.]
Freudenthal, Gad, Aristotle’s theory of material substance: heat and pneuma, form and soul, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995.
[A 70, B 34, B 62, B 98.]
Friedlaender, Paul, “Δὶς καὶ τρὶς τὸ καλόν,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 69, 1938, p. 375-380.
Friedländer, Pablo, “El lenguaje poético de Empédocles,” Synthesis,12, 2005, p. 59-77.
http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/synth/v12/v12a05.pdf
Fritsche, Johannes, “The riddle of the Sphinx: Aristotle, Penelope, and Empedocles,” in: Monsters and philosophy, ed. Charles T. Wolfe, London: College Publications 2005, (Texts in Philosophy, 3), p. 1-19.
Fritzsche, R. A., “Der Magnet und die Athmung in antiken Theorien,” Rheinisches Museum, 57, 1902, p. 363-391.
[P. 368-369: Emp. theory of magnetism; p. 378-379: Emp. theory of breathing.]
Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise, “Avec son diaphragme visionnaire : « ΙΔΥΙΗΣΙ ΠΡΑΠΙΔΕΣΣΙ », Iliade XVIII, 481. À propos du bouclier d’Achille,” Revue des Études Grecques, 115, 2, 2002. p. 463-484.
[Useful for homeric background.]
Fuchs, Werner, “Die Verseuchung des Wassers in Selinus und die Tat des Empedokles,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung, 64, 1957, p. 230-231.
[A 1, par. 70.]
Fuller, B.A.G., History of Greek philosophy: Thales to Democritus, New York: Henry Holt and Company 1923.
[Emp.: p. 181-201.]
Furley, David J., (1956) “The early history of the concept of soul,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 3, 1, 1956, p. 1-18.
[Pages 14-15; a not very original sketch of the Empedoclean conception of soul and cognition; B 117, B 115, B 3.9-12, B 105.2.]
– (1957) “Empedocles and the clepsydra,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77, 1, 1957, p. 31-34.
– (1970) “Variations on Themes from Empedocles in Lucretius’ Proem,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 17, 1970, p. 55-64.
– (1987) “Empedocles and the invention of elements,” in: D. Furley, The Greek cosmologists, Vol I, The formation of the atomic theory and its earliest critics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987, p. 79-104.
[= chap. 7; B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 96, B 98.]
Furley, David J. & Reginald E. Allen (ed.), Studies in Presocratic philosophy, I, The beginnings of philosophy, New York: Humanities Press 1970, (International Library of Philosophy and scientific Method).
[Reprints of Vlastos 1947, Vlastos 1952, McDiarmid 1953, Guthrie 1957, Lloyd 1964.]
– Studies in Presocratic philosophy, II, The Eleatics and Pluralists, Atlantic Highlands (N.J.): Humanities Press 1975, (International Library of Philosophy and scientific Method).
[Repints of Solmsen 1965, Furley 1957.]
Furnari Luvarà, Giusi, “Le origini siceliote della retorica e l’Empedocle di Domenico Scinà,” in: Un secolo di ricerche in Magna Grecia, Atti del ventottesimo Convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 7-12 ottobre 1988, Taranto: Istituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia 1989, p. 185-204.
Furness, Raymond, “Nietzsche and Empedocles,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 2/2, 1971, p. 91-94.
Furth, Montgomery, “A 'philosophical hero'? Anaxagoras and the Eleatics,” in: Modern thinkers & ancient thinkers, The Stanley Victor Keeling memorial lectures at University College London, 1981-1991, ed. R. W. Sharples, London: UCL Press 1993, p. 27-65.
[Emp.: p. 33-35; four roots and Parmenidean ‘Ones’, bone, blood.]
Gaertner, Jean Felix (ed.), Writing exile: The discourse of displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and beyond, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2007, (Mnemosyne, Supplements, 83).
[B 115.]
Gain, Frédéric, “Le statut du « daimon » chez Empédocle,” Philosophie antique, 7, 2007, p. 121-150.
[B 59, B 112, B 115.]
– Aristote. Métaphysique, (livres Α α Γ Ε Ζ Η Θ Λ). Présentation, traduction et notes de Fr. G., Paris: L’Harmattan 2023, (Ouverture philosophique).
[Empédocle : 984a8, 985a2, 985a8, 985a21, 985a29, 988a16, 988a27, 989a20, 993a17, 1009b15, 1009b17, 1069b21, 1072a6, 1075b2.]
Gagné, Renaud, “L'esthétique de la peur chez Empédocle,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 24, 1, 2006, p. 83-110.
[B 115.3.]
– Ancestral fault in ancient Greece, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2013.
[P. 461-463: B 115.]
– “Zeus Panomphaios : réécritures et traditions de l’exégèse,” in: Les dieux d’Homère III, attributs onomastiques, ed. C. Bonnet & G. Pironti, Kernos, supplément 38, 2021, p. 55-79.
[B 123.3.]
Gaiser, Konrad, Il paragone della caverna. Variazioni da Platone a oggi, Naples: Bibliopolis 1985, (Memorie dell’Istituto Italiano per gli studi filosofici, 13).
[B 120, B 121.]
Gaisford, Thomas, Poetae minores graeci, III, Leipzig: in bibliopolio Kuehniano 1823.
[Emp.: p. 284-286. B 17, B 28, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 86, B 87, B 95.]
Gale, Monica Rachel., Myth and poetry in Lucretius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
[P. 59-74, p. 219. B 3, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 128, B 130, B 131, B 151.]
– “Etymological wordplay and poetic succession in Lucretius,” Classical Philology, 96, 2, 2001.
– “Avia Pieridum loca: Tradition and innovation in Lucretius,” in: Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt, ed. Marietta Horster & Christiane Reitz, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2005, (Palingenesia, 85), p. 175-191.
[Several fragments. Mainly: B128.]
Gallavotti, Carlo, (1973) “Alcune frasi di Empedocle interpretate con i criteri di Aristotele,” Rendiconti delle sedute dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei [RAL], classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, 8, 28, 7-12, 1973, p. 773-792.
[B 17, B 35.17, B 13-14, B 115.7.]
– (1974) “Il proemio di Empedocle,” Helicon,13-4, 1973-1974, p. 7-34.
[B 4, B 131; a trial to reconstruct original filiation of fragments: B 131-B 7-B 19, B 16-B 3-B 1-B 2-B 110-B 12-B 4, B 6, B 109-B 107.]
– (1974) “Il punto geometrico e l’uno di Empedocle nel trattato peripatetico della linea indivisible,” Rendiconti dell’academia dell scienze dell’istituto di Bologna, 29, 1974, p. 381-394.
[The text of B 32 is δύο δεῖ; in the context of B 33 it is necessary to read ἡ δὲ στιγμὴ καὶ τὸ <ἓν> ἐν τοῖς ἀκινήτοις.]
– (1975) “Empedocle nei papiri ercolanesi,” in: Le monde grec, hommages à Claire Préaux, ed. J. Bingen, G. Cambier & G. Nachtergael, Brussels: éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles 1975, p. 153-161.
[B 2, A 33, B 6. The mss. of Philodemus cannot be used for an interpretation of B6. B 100, B 112, B 134, B 142.]
– (1975) Empedocle: Poema fisico e lustrale, Milan: Arnoldo Mondadori 19751. (Reprints with bibliography updated: 19914, 19935.)
[+ +]
– (1977) “La critica di Empedocle in Diogene di Enoanda,” Museum Criticum (Bologna), 22, 1975-1977, p. 243-249.
[A 99, B 78.]
– (1976) “Qualche frammento di Empedocle,” in: Scritti in onore di Cleto Carbonara, Napoli 1976, p. 355-366.
[B 9.5.]
– (1981) “Da Stesicoro ad Empedocle,” Kokalos, 26-7, 1980-1981, p. 413-433.
– “Nuovi appunti sul testo di Empedocle,” Bollettino dei classici, 6, 1985, p. 3-27.
[B 2, B 6, 17.18-20, B 110, B 115 13-14, B 121, B 125, B 126, B 131.]
Gallo, Italo, “Ermarco e la polemica Epicura contro Empedocle,” in: Esistenza e destino nel pensiero greco arcaico, ed. P. Cosenza, Napoli: Ed. Scientifiche Italiane 1985, p. 33-50.
[A 99.]
Galsworthy, Carrie, Language and Intent in Empedocles’ cosmic cycle, diss., University of Cincinnati, 2010.
Garani, Myrto, (2005) Poetry and analogy in Empedocles and Lucretius, diss., University of London, 2005.
– (2007) “Cosmological oaths in Empedocles and Lucretius,” in: Horkos: the oath in Greek society, ed. A.H. Sommerstein - J. Fletcher, Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press 2007, p. 189-202, and 264-267.
– (2007) Empedocles Redivivus: Poetry and analogy in Lucretius, New York-Abingdon: Routledge 2007.
[See review by Bill Gladhill at BMCR: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-05-24.html. A lot of fragments are mentioned in this book. The main ones are: B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 13, B 145, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 55, B 57, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 75, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 89B 91, B 92, B 93, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 129, B 131, a(ii).]
– (2008) “The palingenesis of Empedocles’ Calliope in Lucretius,” in: Essays on ancient literatures: Greece, Rome and the near East, Proceedings of the Venice International University "Advanced seminar in the humanities" 2004-2005, ed. E. Cingano & L. Milano, Padua: S.A.R.G.O.N 2008. (Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità e del Vicino Oriente / Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 4), p. 231-265.
– (2013) “Lucretius and Ovid on Empedoclean Cows and Sheep,” in: Lucretius: Poetry, philosophy, science, ed. D. Lehoux, A. D. Morrison & A. Sharrock, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013, p. 233-259.
[B 17, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 128, B 136, B 137, a(ii).]
– (2014) “The figure of Numa in Ovid’s Fasti,” in: The philosophizing Muse: The influence of Greek philosophy on Roman poetry, ed. M. Garani & D. Konstan, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge scholars Publishing 2014.
– (2018) “Ο ελεγειακός Εμπεδοκλής: εμπεδόκλειες απηχήσεις στην Οβιδιανή Vesta,” Φιλοσοφία, 48 II, 2018, p. 77-95.
– (2022) “The presence of Empedoclean Aratus in Ovid’s Fasti: revisited,” Φιλοσοφία, 52, 2022, p. 411-435.
[This article was published in 2024. It is a substantially revised version of “Ο ελεγειακός Εμπεδοκλής” in Φιλοσοφία, 48 II, 2018. B 6, B 17, B 27, B 28, B 35, B 61, B 123, B 128, B 134.]
Garbarino, Giovanna, “Poetica esplicita e implicita nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio,” Bollettino di studi latini, 37, 2, 2007, p. 504-516.
García-Bacca, Juan, David, Los Presocráticos. Traducción y notas, Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica 19441; 1979², (Col. popular, 177). 2007: 10th reprint.
[Emp. : p. 55-100, 173-224. [+ +].]
García Díaz, Adolfo, “La metafísica de Empédocles,” Diánoia, 2, 1956, p. 167-180.
http://dianoia.filosoficas.unam.mx/files/2213/7021/0854/DIA56_Garcia_Diaz.pdf
García Escrivá, Vicente, “Los nombres divinos de los cuatro elementos,” Trama & Fondo - Revista de Cultura, 41, 2016 p. 79-86.
http://www.tramayfondo.com/revista/libros/182/07_Garcia-Escriva.pdf
[B 6.]
García Gual, Carlos, “Empédocles de Agrigento,” Universitas Philosophica, 13, 25-26, 1996, p. 11-26.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/2400802.pdf
García López, Yolanda, “The subordination of the epic to mystic poetics: the example of Polyphemus in love,” in: Ancient Epic: Linguistic and Literary Essays, ed. M. Díaz de Cerio Díez, C. Cabrillana & C. Criado, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2015, p. 101-136.
[P. 107- 110: Ovid's Galatea and Empedocles' Muse, B 3, B 128, B 17; p. 112: B 17, B 61; p. 119: B 110; p. 121: B 115.]
Garin, Marianne, “Le Sage en homme de peu. Remarques sur la construction ancienne d’une “iconographie”,” Dialogues d'histoire ancienne, 47, 2, 2021, p. 15 à 38.
[A 1.73, B 112.]
Garland, Robert, The Greek way of death, London: Duckworth 1985.
[Page 63: a short survey of E. Katharmoi; E. was influenced with Orphism; E. did not acknowledge any underworld and judgment after death; B 144.]
– The eye of the beholder. Deformity and disability in the Graeco-Roman world, London: Duckworth, 1995, p. 174-176.
[A rather traditional overview of Empedoclean ‘evolutionary’ zoology from untraditional teratological perspective; A 72, B 57, B 61, B 62.]
Garrido Clemente, Maria, Pilar, “El debate acerca del presunto influjo del Pseudo-Empédocles en el pensamiento de Ibn Massarra de Córdoba,” Revista española de filosofía medieval, 16, 2009, p. 23-34.
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3144517.pdf
Gatz, Bodo, Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen, Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1967.
[B 128, B 130.]
Gatzemeier, Matthias, “Empedokles,” in: Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, ed. von J. Mittelstraass, Mannheim-Wien-Zürich: Metzler 1980, I.540-541.
Gaudentius, Paganinus, (Gaudenzio, Paganino), De pythagoroea animarum transmigratione..., Pisis 1641.
[See L. Paquet, Y. Lafrance, Les Présocratiques [1450-1879] III, Québec: Bellarmin 1995, p. 89.]
Gautier, Paul (éd.), Michel Italikos. Lettres et discours, édités par P. G., Paris: Institut français d’études byzantines 1972, (Archives de l’Orient chrétien, 14).
Gee, Emma, Aratus and the astronomical tradition, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2013, (Classical culture and society).
[1.2 Aratus and Empedocles, p. 29-33, B 8, B 17, B 128.]
– “Dogs, snakes and heroes: hybridism and polemic in Lucretius’ De rerum natura,” in: Latin literature and its transmission. Papers in honour of Michael Reeve, ed. R. Hunter & S. P. Oakley, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 108-141.
[B 61. Emp.: p. 127-129.]
– Mapping the afterlife: from Homer to Dante, New York: Oxford University Press 2020.
[B 23, B 100, B 115.]
Geizie W. = Veazie, W. B. = error in L’année philologique 1926.
Gemelli Marciano, M. Laura, (1990) Le metamorfosi della tradizione: mutamenti di significato e neologismi nel Peri physeos di Empedocle, Bari: Levante editori 1990.
– (1991) “L’atomismo e il corpuscolarismo empedocleo: frammenti di interpretazioni nel mondo antico,” Elenchos, 12, 1991, p. 5-37.
[A 43, A 44, A 86, A 87, A 89, A 92, B 23, B 26, B 89, B 98, B 105.]
– (1994) “Der Tod des Empedokles,” in: Kleos: Estemporaneo di studi e testi sulla fortuna dell’antico, ed. F. De Martino, Bari: Levante 1994, p. 71-74.
– (2000) “Alain Martin, Oliver Primavesi: L’Empédocle de Strasbourg Empedocles (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666),” Gnomon, 72, 2000, p. 389-400.
[Important. Apollo. Aambiguities in Emp. A 25, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 31, B 59, B 62, B 76, B 109, B 115, B 117, B 126, B 139, a(i)6, a(i)8, a(ii)30, a(ii)17, c, d, “we” in Pap. Strasb.]
– (2001) “Le ‘demonologie’ Empedoclee,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 205-235.
[A 25, ambiguities in Emp., B 24, B 26, B 20, B 115, B 59, “we” in Pap. Strasb.]
– (2002) “Le contexte culturel des Présocratiques : adversaires et destinataires,” in: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique ? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed. A. Laks & C. Louguet, Lille : Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 83-114.
[Emp.: p. 106-111.]
– (2005) “Empedocles’ zoogony and embryology,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 373-404.
http://www.klphs.uzh.ch/aboutus/personen/gemelli/gemelli_empedokles_2005.pdf
[A 72, B 20, B 27, B 62, B 126, d 14, reincarnation, P. Derveni, and P. Kingsley’s leitmotiv: Philia binds (imprisonment of the four divine roots) Neikos releases (freedom of the four divine roots); Pausanias must learn how to bind and release. Empedocles is a purifier, iatromantis, seerhealer.]
– (2007) “Lire du début : Quelques observations sur les incipit des présocratiques,” Philosophie antique, 7, 2007, p. 7-37.
[P. 9-13: B 2.]
– (2009) Die Vorsokratiker, II, Parmenides, Zenon, Empedokles: griechisch-lateinisch-deutsch - Auswahl der Fragmente und Zeugnisse, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen von M. L. G. M., Düsseldorf: Patmos, Artemis & Winkler 2009, (Sammlung Tusculum); 2, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2011; 3, überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 2013.
[2013 vs 2009: the difference from the previous edition resides in the updated bibliography at the end of the volume. [+ +].]
– (2012) “Die empedokleische 'Vierelementenlehre'. Überlegungen über die Anfänge einer 'naturwissenschaftlichen' Theorie,” in: ELEMENTE – ΣΤΟΙΧΕΙΑ – ELEMENTA: Antike und moderne Naturwissenschaft zum Ursprung der Dinge, Schweizerischer Altphilologenverband, Luzern, 2012, p. 25-36. (In this article, the author signes under the name Laura Gemelli.)
[B 2, B 6, B 38, B 62, B 96.]
– (2013) “Feuer bei Heraklit und Empedokles: Aspekte und Funktionen einer göttlichen Kraft,” in: Feuer und Wasser, Beiträge der Eranos Tagungen 2011 und 2012, ed. E. Hornung-A. Schweizer, Basel: Schwabe 2013, p. 133-157.
– (2017) “Catarsi, misteri, magia. Empedocle e la Sicilia nel V secolo a. C.,” in: Lezioni bellinzonesi vol. 10: Presenza del classico, ed. F. Beltraminelli, Bellinzona: Edizioni Casagrande 2017, p. 100-121.
[This article is signed: Laura Gemelli.]
– (2024) Presocratici. Vol. 2, Sentieri di sapienza da Velia ad Agrigento da Parmenide a Empedocle, Mondadori, Fondazione Lorenzo Valla 2024.
Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys, “Purifying rhetoric: Empedocles and the myth of rhetorical theory,” The quarterly journal of speech, 96, 3, 2010, p. 231-256.
Genovese, Cristina, “The ‘upper sanctuary of Demeter’ at S. Biagio in Akragas: a review,” in: The Akragas dialogue. New investigations on sanctuaries in Sicily, ed. M. de Cesare, E. C. Portale & N. Sojc, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2020, p. 169-200.
[Nestis?]
Georgakellos, Nicos, I., Empedocles of Acragas: his theory and the exact sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019.
[See below Γεωργακέλλος, Νίκος.]
George, Sarah, Human conception and fetal growth: a study in the development of Greek thought from the Presocratics through Aristotle, Diss. University of Pennsylvania, 1982.
[Emp.: Empedocles and the Hot/Cold Theory, p. 55-68. A 74, A 77, A 81, A 84, B 67, B 100.]
Gerke, Hans, Sprache und Stil des Empedokles, diss., Göttingen 1953.
Gernet, Louis, Recherches sur le développement de la pensée juridique et morale en Grèce : étude sémantique, Paris: Ernest Leroux 19171 (2nd edition, Paris: Albin Michel 2001², with new pagination).
[B 115: p. 39 [p. 55], 47 [63], 312 [313], 316 [317], B 121: 242 [246], B 144: 242 [246].]
Gerson, Lloyd P. (ed.), The Enneads, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018.
Γεωργακέλλος, Νίκος Ι, Εμπεδοκλής - υπό το πρίσμα των φυσικών επιστημών, Αθήνα, Ευρασία, 2008.
Gheerbrant, Xavier, (2012) “Qui sont les destinataires du fragment 3 d’Empédocle ?,” in: Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 11, 2012, p. 78-98.
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/334/547
[B 3.]
– (2014) Poésie et argumentation dans les fragments des deux poèmes d'Empédocle, Diss. Langue et Littérature grecques, Université de Lille 3, Oct. 2014.
[B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17 + ensemble a, B 20 + ensemble c, B 21, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 84, B 86, B 100, B 112 (vv. 1-4), B 114, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131, fr. 509 Bollack.]
– (2017) Empédocle, une poétique philosophique, Paris: Classiques Garnier 2017, (Kaïnon, anthropologie de la pensée ancienne, 6).
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/xavier-gheerbrant
[Useful. An in-depth study of several fragments. B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 84, B 86, B 100, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131.]
– (2018) “Ritornell and episodic composition in Empedocles,” Yearbook of Ancient Greek Epic, 2, 1, 2018, p. 40-77.
– (2018) “Théorie poétique, vérité et représentation du divin chez Empédocle et Pindare,” Pallas, 108, 2018, p. 211-224.
http://journals.openedition.org/pallas/10342.
[B 3.]
– (2018) “Poetry and philosophy in Empedocles: two poems, one project,” Museum Sinicum (Fudan University, Shangai), 1, 2018, p. 169-214.
[B 1, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 71, B 107, B 112, B 115, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 131, B 133, B 134, a MP.]
– (2019) “Prose, poésie, modes de signification et modes de rationalité aux origines de la philosophie. À propos de : Sassi (M. M.), The beginnings of philosophy in Greece,” Revue des études anciennes, 121, 2, 2019, p. 467-484.
– (2020) “Traduire Empédocle, entre poésie et philosophie : comparaison de dix traductions en cinq langues (1838-2016),” in: La traduction épistémique : entre poésie et prose, ed. Tatiana Milliaressi, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2020, (Traductologie), p. 87-141.
[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 20, B 61, φρήν, φρονεῖν, φρόνημα, φροντίς, etc. νοῦς, νοεῖν, νόημα, μέριμνα, πραπίδες.]
– (2022) “Addressees, knowledge, and action in Hesiod and Empedocles,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 263-293.
[B 1, B 2, B 15, B 17, B 20, B 22, B 24, B 110, B111, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 132, B 137, B 146.]
Gheerbrant, Xavier, & Maxime Laurent, “Les syllabes et les sons chez Empédocle dans les travaux de Jean Bollack,” in: Lire Jean Bollack – Jean Bollack lesen, ed. S. Cudré-Mauroux, Ch. König & M. Steinrück, Basel: Schwabe 2023, (Bollackiana, 1), p. 173-194.
[B 15, B 21, B 17, B 21, B 35, B 39, B 110, B 111.]
Ghidini - Tortorelli, Marisa, “Instanze utopiche nel mito dell’età dell’oro. Ricerca su alcuni frammenti di Empedocle,” Atti dell’Accademia Pontaniana, 20, 1970-1971, p. 155-172 (N.S. XX, 1971, p. 1-18).
Ghira, Danilo, “Empedocle, fr. 20 e 115 DK: ‘l'intuizione del singolo’,” Maia, 67, 1, 2015, p. 25-35.
[B 6, B 17, B 20, B 115, B 188, B 124, B 134, B 135.]
Giannantoni, Gabriele, (1967) “Review of Jean Bollack, Empédocle, I Introduction à l’ancienne physique, 1965,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 95, 1967, p. 331-335.
– (1969) “31. Empedocle,” in: I presocratici: testimonianze e frammenti, Bari: Laterza 1969, (Biblioteca Universale), p. 323-421.
[Translation of Diels-Kranz 1951, with foot notes. [+ +].]
– (1989) “Empedocle: mito e realtà,” in: La cultura filosofica della Magna Grecia, Messina 1989, p. 43-62.
– (1999) “L’originalità del pluralismo empedocleo,” Elenchos, 18, 1997, p. 235-255. Reprint in: Giornale di Metafisica - Nuova Serie, XXI, 1999, p. 31-50.
[Empedocle a Selinunte, Empedocle: religione e filosofia, L’originalità di Empedocle, Empedocle e la filosofia dell’eleatismo, B 2, B 3, B 111, B 112.]
– (1998) “L’interpretazione aristotelica di Empedocle,” Elenchos, 19/2, 1998, p. 361-411.
[Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.]
Giardina, Giovanna,.R., “Empedocle e gli Empedoclei sui condotti vuoti,” in: La chimica fisica di Aristotele : teoria degli elementi e delle loro proprietà, analisi critica del De generatione et corruptione. Roma: Aracne 2008, (Scienze storiche, filosofiche, pedagogiche e psicologiche, 285), p. 142-144
– “Jean Philopon, commentateur d’Aristote, Physique II 8,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 32, 2, 2014, p. 179-224.
[B 61.]
– “Empedocles and the other physiologists in Aristotle’s Physics II 8,” Peitho, 7, 2016, p. 13-23.
[A 48, B 53-54, B 62.]
Gigandet, Alain, “Plutarque contre Colotès contre Empédocle,” Aitia, 3, 2013, p. 2-10.
http://aitia.revues.org/636
[A 34, A 44, A 48, B 8, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 19, B 21, B 35.]
Gigante, Marcello, “Attendendo Empedocle. Un’insidia al recupero del testo autentico,” Studi Italiani di filologia classica, 15, 1997, p. 131-134.
[Pap. Strasb. aII.26 and 30, c 1-2 = B 20, B 2.1, B 100.1-2.]
Gigon, Olof, “Zum antiken Begriff der Harmonie,” Studium Generale, 19, 1966, p. 539-547.
Gilbert, Otto, Die Meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1907. [Chap. V: Empedokles, p. 105-124; B 6, B 21.]
– “Spekulation und Volksglaube in der ionischen Philosophie,” Archiv für Religionswissenschaft, 13, 1910, p. 306-332.
– Griechische Religionsphilosophie, Leipzig: W. Engelmann 1911.
[P. 197-225. P. 200-202: B 6; p. 204: B 17, B 35; p. 205: B 115; p. 206: B 17, B 26 ; p. 207-208: Sphairos; p. 211, 215: B 35; p. 221: B 135; p. 222: B 133, B 134.]
Gibertie, Thomas, “Simonide Empédocle et Gorgias : l’héritage poétique dans la formation du vocabulaire en Grèce ancienne,” Mémoire de Maîtrise, Université Michel de Montaigne, Bordeaux, 1999-2000.
[Emp.: p. 34-55. La Muse. B 3, B 4, B 6, B 17, B 112, B 115, B 131.]
Giescecke, Alfred, De philosophorum veterum quae ad exilium spectant sententis, Leipzig 1891.
Gill, Christopher, The person and the human mind: issues in ancient and modern philosophy, ed. by Christopher Gill, Oxford-New York: Clarendon Press 1990.
[P. 205: daimôn as occult self. B 115.]
– “La psychologie présocratique : quelques questions interprétatives,” in: Les anciens savants : études sur les philosophies préplatoniciennes, ed. Pierre-Marie Morel & Jean-François Pradeau, (Les Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg, 12), Université Marc Bloch, Strasbourg 2001, p. 169-189.
Giombini Stefania, “Review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, de Rossetti L., e C. Santaniello,” Nova Tellus, 28.2, 2010.
http://redalyc.org.www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59120919014
Giordani, Pietro, “Review of Scinà, Memorie (1813),” Biblioteca Italiana, I, 1816, p. 322-333, II, p. 15-21, IV, p. 247-259.
[ = P. Giordani, Opere, ed. A. Gussalli, Milan 1857, X.14-37. P. 25-27: B 100.]
Giornetti, Francesco, El Empédocles inédito de Giorgio Colli, Universidad nacional de educación a distancia, Facultad de Filosofía, Trabajo fin de grado en Filosofía, Directora María Teresa Oñate y Zubia, Seville, June 2017.
Giraldi (Gyraldus), G. G., Historiae poetarum tam Graecorum quam Latinorum dialogi decem, Basileae 1545, Dialogus III, p. 296-299.
[A concise biography of Emp. with quotation of B 112.4 and B 117; the main source is evidently DL.]
Gkarani, Myrto, see Garani, Myrto.
Gladigow, Burkhard, “Zum Makarismos des Weisen,” Hermes, 95, 1967, p. 404-433.
[B 110, B 115, B 129, B 132.]
Gladisch, August, “Empedokles und die alten Aegypter,” Jahrbücher für speculative Philosophie und die philosophische Bearbeitung der empirischen Wissenschaften, 2/4, 1847, p. 681-725 and 5/2, p. 903-944. [This is repeated more fully in 1858.]
– Empedokles und die Aegypter. Eine historische Untersuchung von A. G., mit Erläuterungen aus den Aegyptischen Denkmälern von Dr. Heinrich Brugsch und Joseph Passalacqua, Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs 1858.
[Fantastic and improbable identification of Empedoclean teaching with Egyptian beliefs; some textual suggestions.]
– “Das mystische vierspeichige Rad bei den alten Aegyptern und Hellenen,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 15/2, 1861, p. 406-409.
Glénisson, Marine, “Empédocle dans l’Icaroménippe : menteur invétéré ou plaisant démon lunaire ?,” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 2, 2016, p. 64-78.
[Lucian. B 112, daimôn.]
Goebel, Karl, “Empedokles,” in: Die vorsokratische Philosophie, Bonn: Carl Georgi 1910, p. 191-226.
Golitsis, Pantélis, “Un commentaire perpétuel de Georges Pachymère à la Physique d’Aristote, faussement attribué à Michel Psellos,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 100, 2, 2008, p. 637-676.
[91b R = Mansfeld-Primavesi.]
Golosovker, J., “Empedokl iz Agrigenta,” in: Gelděrlin, F., Smerť Empedokla, Moskva-Leningrad 1931.
Gomperz, Theodor, Griechische Denker. Eine Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, I, Leipzig: Veit & Comp. 1896. 1903². 19113, 19224.
[Emp.: p. 183-204. Engl. transl. Greek thinkers: A history of ancient philosophy, Bristol 1996 (19051), I. p. 227-254. French translation by A. Reymond in Théodore Gomperz. Les penseurs de la Grèce: histoire de la philosophie antique, I, Paris: F. Alcan 1908, Lausanne: Payot 1908.]
– “Herculanische Notizen,” Wiener Studien, 2, 1880, p. 139-142, p. 140.
[B 100.1-2.]
– “Zu Empedokles,” Hermes, 31, 1896, p. 469-471.
– “Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung griechischer Schriftsteller,” Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, 152, 1906, p. 1-31.
[Emp.: p. 14-15. The author attempts to identify the supposed Empedoclean fragment.]
Gonçalves, Isabel, Cristina Rocha Hipólito, “Necessidade e teleologia na teoria da natureza em Empédocles e Aristóteles,” Pensando, Revista de Filosofia, 5, 9, 2014, p. 146-166.
https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/3036/1766
González Escudero, Santiago, “Raíces y elementos en Empédocles,” El Basilisco, 1st collection, 13, 1981-1982, p. 62-69.
http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/bas11306.htm
http://www.filosofia.org/ave/001/a297.htm
http://www.fgbueno.es/bas/pdf/bas11306.pdf
[B 6.]
González Martínez, Carmen, “Empédocles, Fausto y los "musulmanes" del Lager: la muerte a través del tiempo y la memoria histórica,” in: Miradas a la historia: reflexiones historiográficas en recuerdo de Miguel Rodríguez Llopis, ed. J. A. Gómez Hernández & N. Marín, Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, 2004, p. 39-56.
Görgemanns, Herwig, Philologos Kosmos. Kleine Schriften zur antiken Literatur, Naturwissenschaft, Philosophie und Religion, ed. R. Hirsch-Luipold & M. Baumbach, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2013, (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum, 73).
[B 42, B 100, B 106, B 115, B 118.]
Görner, Rüdiger, “Empedokles,” in: Historische Gestalten der Antike: Rezeption in Literatur, Kunst und Musik (= Der Neue Pauly. Supplemente. Band 8), ed. P. von Möllendorff, A. Simonis, L. Simonis, Stuttgart - Weimar: J.B. Metzler 2013, p. 405-412.
Goto (後藤), Jun (淳), “エンペドクレス哲学において思惟性と生命性を担うフレーン,” 東亜大学紀要, 12, 2010, p. 25-39.
[“Φρήν carrying the thoughtfulness and vitality in Empedocles’ philosophy.” This article can be read on the web with an abstract in English. Link found with the address of the author: jung510@toua-u.ac.jp. - B 134.]
Gottlieb, Anthony, The dream of reason: a history of Western philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance, London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press 2000, Penguin Books 2001; New York-London: W.W. Norton & Company 2016².
Gottschalk, H. B., Heraclides Pontus, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1980.
[The apotheosis of Empedocles: p. 13-22., A1.]
Goulet, Richard, “Empédocle,” in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, III, ed. R. Goulet, Paris: C.N.R.S.-Éditions 2000, p. 66-88 (except p. 67-70 for ‘Papyrus de Strasbourg’ by A. Martin).
Goytisolo, Juan, “Las chinelas de Empédocles,” in: Obras completas, I. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg : Círculo de Lectores. 2005, (Opera mundi), p 354-391.
Grabowski, Franz, Empedokles und Leukipp-Demokrit, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Anaxagoras, diss., Breslau: Hochschulverlag 1923.
Graf, Fritz, Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens in vorhellenistischer Zeit, Berlin-New York 1974.
Graf, Fritz & Sarah Iles Johnston, Ritual texts for the afterlife. Orpheus and the bacchic gold tablets, Abingdon - New York: Routledge 2007.
Graham, Daniel, Watkins, (1985) “Review of Empedocles: The extant fragments by M.R. Wright, 1981,” International Studies in Philosophy, 17, 1, 1985, p. 119-121.
– (1988) “Symmetry in the Empedoclean cycle,” The Classical Quarterly, 38, 2, 1988, p. 297-312.
– (1999) “Empedocles and Anaxagoras: Responses to Parmenides,” in: The Cambridge Companion to ancient Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 159-180.
– (2002) “La lumière de la lune dans la pensée grecque archaïque,” in: Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique ? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed. A. Laks & C. Louguet, Lille, 2002, p. 351-380.
– “The topology and dynamics of Empedocles’ cycle,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 225-244.
– (2006) Explaining the cosmos: the Ionian tradition of scientific philosophy, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2006.
[B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, , B 36, B 62, B 96, B 98.]
– The texts of early Greek philosophy: the complete fragments and selected testimonies of the major Presocratics, Part I, Cambridge: University Press 2010.
[Emp.: p. 326 - 433 – [+ +]]
Graham, Daniel W., Zachary Herzog & Michael Williams, “Earth, wind, and fire: Aristotle on violent storm events, with reconsideration of the terms ἐκνεφίας, τυφών, κεραυνός, and πρηστήρ,” Apeiron, 2021 (on-line), p. 1-26.
[The four elements.]
Grammatico, Giuseppina, “L'immaginario empedocleo,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 48-70.
Greco, Giovanna, “La città di Empedocle: le evidenze archeologiche,” in: Empedocle. Tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e política, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 198-220.
Greene, William, Chase, “Fate, Good, and Evil in Pre-Socratic philosophy,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 47, 1936, p. 85-129.
[Emp., p. 110-118.]
Gregory, Andrew, “Empedocles,” in: Ancient Greek cosmogony, London: Bloomsbury 2007, p. 78-101.
[Chap. 5. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. Interesting focus on chance in cosmogony and zoogony. “The kosmoi generated by the cycle are not identical, and the differences are down to chance”. B 8, B 12, B 13, B 14, 17, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 62, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 103, B 104, B 124, a(i) 6, a(ii) 17.]
– “Empedocles,” in: The Presocratics and the supernatural: magic, philosophy and science in early Greece, London: Bloomsbury 2013. p. 167-184.
[Ch. 9. Empedocles’ ontology, meteorology, cosmogony, zoogony. Love and Strife. Empedocles’ gods. Empedocles’ magic? Empedocles as a shaman? Empedocles’ claims. Metempsychosis. Empedocles and Homer. It is possible to have a view of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle where there are only natural entities and processes. The lava lamp is used as an analogy for what the world under total Strife would be. B 111. B 112.]
– Anaximander: a re-assessment, London-Oxford-New York: Bloomsbury 2016.
Gregory, Joshua, C., Combustion from Heracleitos to Lavoisier, London: Edward Arnold 1934.
[Emp.: p. 11-16. B 6, B 17, B 100.]
Griffith, R. Drew, “Oedipus’s bloodthirsty sons: Love and Strife in Pindar’s Second “Olympian Ode”,” Classical Antiquity, 10, 1, p. 46-58.
– “Theocritus, Idyll 11.13–18: Galatea as Thetis Manquée,” Mouseion, 3, 19, 2022, p. 1-23.
[Thoosa. B 17, B 57, B 124, B 141.]
Griffiths, John, Gwyn, Plutarch’s de Iside et Osiride. Edited with an introduction, translation and commentary by J. G. G., University of Wales Press 1970.
Grilli, Alberto, “Lucrezio tra poesia e filosofia,” Annali del liceo G. Garibaldi di Palermo, 14-16, 1977-1979, p. 197-216.
[Lucretius was inspired mainly by Homer, Hesiod, Emp. and Ennius.]
Grimal, Edmonde, A propos d’un passage du Ménon, une définition “tragique” de la couleur,” Revue des études grecques 55, 1942, p. 1-13.
[ 921.]
Grmek, Mirko D., “La légende et la réalité de la nocivité des fèves,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 2, 1, 1980, p. 61-121.
[B 140.]
Groisard, Jocelyn, “Empedocles on mules’ sterility: a philological and philosophical note,” Philologica (フィロロギカ―古典文献学のために), 11, 2016, p. 21-30.
[A 82, B 63, B 92.]
– “Hybridity and sterility in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” in: Aristotle’s Generation of animals. A critical guide, ed. Andrea Falcon & David Lefebvre, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018, p. 153-170.
[B 92.]
Grotius, Hugo, Dicta poetarum quae apud Jo. Stobaeum exstant. Emendata et latino carmine reddita ab H. G. Plutarchi et Basilii Magni de usu Graecorum poetarum libelli, Parisiis: N. Buon 1623.
[16252; Bollack, 1969, III, p. 659, mentions this title among “éditions des fragments et commentaires”, p. 152 (B 6), 166 (B 105) and 170 (B 115.1-2).]
– Annotationes in novum testamentum, VI, Groningen: Zuidema 18282.
[Annotationes in epistolam ad Romanos, cap. I, p. 23; B 134.]
Grottanelli, Cristiano., “Healers and saviours of the Eastern Mediterranean in pre-classical times,” in: La soteriologia dei culti orientali nell’Impero Romano, ed. U. Bianchi - M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden 1982, p. 649-670.
Grünwald, Michael, Die Anfänge der abendländischen Philosophie. Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Mit einer Einführung von M. Laura Gemelli Marciano, Zürich-Münich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Artemis Verlag 1991, (Bibliothek der Antike).
[Emp.: p. 121-144. An extensive translation of B fragments and A testimonies; and p. 225-230: notices. Does not follow Diels’s ordering of the fragments. First edition in Zürich: Artemis 1949.]
Gruppe, Otto, Griechische Mythologie und Religionsgeschichte, Band I-II, Munich 1903-1906.
[I.429 (B 6) and II.1044 (Empedocles as a magician).]
Guglielmino, Francesco, “Empedocle,” in: Tradizione 1939.[???]
Guimarães, Bias Busquet, O poema de Empédocles: três linhas interpretativas em língua portuguesa, Monografia para a obtenção do grau Licenciatura em Filosofia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2019.
– O Poema de Empédocles: Uma renovação da teoria do ciclo cósmico, Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia), Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2021.
http://www.pgfi.uff.br/index.php/dissertacoes/
http://www.pgfi.uff.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2021_Bias_Busquet.pdf
[Harmony - A 32, A 37, A 38, A 52, A 41, A 42, A 44, A 46, A 47, A 48, A 50, A 56, A 58, A 64, A 67, A 72, A 75, B 6, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 38, B 54, B 57, B 62, B 71, B 73, B 89, B 110, B 114, B 115, B 116, B 117, B 121, B 125, B 146.]
Gulley, Joshua, Mixture, powers, and reality in Empedocles and Aristotle, diss., Purdue University, Department of philosophy, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2017.
[Chapter 3.5 has the title "The Empedoclean Roots as Power-Stuffs". The word "roots" is used many times, but fr. 6 is never quoted. For Gulley, the four roots are fire, air, water and earth. Homer and Hesiod are never quoted for the understanding of Empedocles. B 8, B 9, B 12, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 28, B 35, B 38, B 71, B 73, B 84, B 91, B 96, B 115, B 134, B 137.]
Guthrie, William Keith Chambers, (1935) Orpheus and Greek religion: a study of the orphic movement, London: Methuen & Company 1935. Reprint with foreword in 1952². Reprint in Princeton (N.J): Princeton University Press 1993. French translation by S.M. Guillemin of the second edition of 1952 in Paris: Guthrie W.K.C., Orphée et la religion grecque, Payot 1956.
[P. 169: B 115, B 146-147. P.175: B 112, B 117. P.197: B 128, B 136, B 137. P. 231-232.]
– (1952) “The presocratic world-picture,” The Harvard Theological Review, 45, 2, 1952, p. 87-104.
[Empedocles: p. 93, 98-102, some remarks on Empedocles´ theory of soul, daimones, cosmos.]
http://www.upf.edu/materials/fhuma/hiid1/mat/txt/guthrie.pdf
– (1954) The Greeks and their Gods, Boston: Beacon Press 1954 (First edition: 1950).
[P. 309-325: Orphism and Empedocles.]
– (1957) In the Beginning: Some Greek views on the origins of life and the early state of man, London: Methuen & Co 1957. Also: Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1957, (The Messenger lectures, 1957).
[P. 42-45, 72-73; B 61, B 62; B 128.]
– (1962) A history of Greek philosophy, I, The earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1962.
[A 85, B 26, B 52, B 62, B 96, B 109, B 115: p. 318-319, 482 - two souls, B 127, B 134, B 139, B 140.]
– (1965) A history of Greek philosophy, II, The presocratic tradition from Parmenides to Democritus, Cambridge-London-New York: Cambridge University Press 1965.
[Emp.: p. 122-265. [+ +]]
Guzzo, Augusto, “Empedocle d’Agrigento,” Atti dell’Accademia di scienze, lettere e arti di Palermo, IV, 23, 2, 1962-1963, p. 121-180.
[Also as an extract with same title and pagination, Palermo, Presso l’Accademia 1964. B 2-3, B 6, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 27-31, B 35, B 38, B 40-42, B 44-45, B 47, B 54, B 57, B 67, B 71-73, B 77-78, B 79, B 82-83, B 84, B 85-89, B 96, B 100, B 102-103, B 105-107, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 117, B 120-123, B 128, B 129, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 138, B 139, B 144, B 146, B 147.]
Gysembergh, Victor, “Source et valeur des fragments antiques sans parallèle dans le Livre de l’Amour d’Agostino Nifo,” Revue de Philologie, 90, 2, 2016, p. 29-45.
[A new account of Empedocles, p. 39. Good Love and bad Love.]
Habash Justin, Early Greek philosophy and the discovery of nature, Diss. McAnulty College, Duquesne University, 2016.
[Emp.: p. 149-165.]
Habermehl, P[eter?], “Empedokles,” in: Metzler Philosophen Lexicon, ed. von B. Luty, Stuttgart: Metzler 1989, p. 217-219.
Hack, Roy Kenneth, God in Greek philosophy to the time of Socrates, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1931.
[Chapter X: Empedocles and Anaxagoras, p. 94-117; Empedocles: 94-102.]
Hadot, Pierre, Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique ?, Paris: Gallimard 1995.
[P. 276-277: B 129; p. 278: B 132.]
Hahm, David E., The origins of Stoic cosmology, Colombus: Ohio State University Press, 1977.
[B 6, B 8, B 17, B 38, B 62, B 73.]
Halapsis, A. V., “Divine evolution: Empedocles’ anthropology,” Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 19, 2021, p. 107-116.
[B 8, B 11, B 12, B 23, B 35, B 112, B 117, B 126.]
Halbertsma, Klaas Tjalling Agnus, “Over den wijsgeer Empedokles,” Hermeneus, 21, 1949, p. 3-9, 22-26 and 62-68.
Halbwachs, Maurice, “La représentation de l’âme chez les Grecs : le double corporel et le double spirituel,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 37/4, 1930, p. 493-534.
[Emp. p. 518-519.]
Hall, Alexander, E. W., “Dating the Homeric Hymn to Selene: Evidence and Implications,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 53, 2013, p. 15-30.
[Moon, B 45.]
Hall, Edith, “Political and cosmic turbulence in Euripides’ Orestes,” in: Tragedy, comedy and the polis. Papers from the Greek Drama Conference: Nottingham, 18-20 July 1990, ed. A. H. Sommerstein, St. Halliwell, J. Henderson, B. Zimmermann, Bari: Levante Editori 1993, p. 263-285.
[Strife.]
Hall, Matthew, Plants as Persons: a philosophical botany, Albany (New York): State University of New York Press 2011, (SUNY series on religion and the environment).
[Emp., p. 18-19, in a chapter called 'The roots of disregard'. B 21, B 107, B 136, B 140.]
Halleux, Robert, Le problème des métaux dans la science antique, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1974, (Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l’Université de Liège, fasc. 209), Presses universitaires de Liège & OpenEdition Books 2013.
[Chapitre I. Les présocratiques : http://books.openedition.org/pulg/967 A 34, A 89, B 91, B 92.]
Hallier, Aemilius [Emil], Lucreti carmina e fragmentis Empedoclis adumbrata, diss., Ienae: Typis Maukii 1857.
Ham, Charles Tyler, Empedoclean elegy: love, strife and the four elements in Ovid’s amores, ars amatorial and fasti, Diss., classical studies, University of Pennsylvania, 2013.
– “Venus discors. The Empedocleo-Lucretian background of Venus and Calliope's song, in Metamorphoses 5,” in: Philosophy in Ovid, Ovid as philosopher, ed. K. Volk & G. D. Williams, New York: Oxford University Press 2022 p. 164-183.
[B 6, B 17, B 115, B 128, B 131.]
Hamblenne, P., “Au Salluste inconnu,” Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire, 59, 1981, p. 60-70.
[A 20.]
Hamelin, Octave, Les philosophes présocratiques. Introduction, références et appendices de M. Fernand Turlot. Préface de Clémence Ramnoux, Strasbourg: Association des publications près les Universités de Strasbourg 1978.
[Emp.: p. 145-165. ‘Texte d’un cours professé à la Sorbonne, 1905-1906’. Elements, principles.]
Hanf, Roland, Begriffliches Denken bei Empedokles, diss., Kiel, 1999-2000.
Hani, Jean, Plutarque. Œuvres morales. Tome VIII, texte établi et traduit par J. H., Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1980, (Collection des Universités de France – Budé, 275).
[Traités 42-45. De l’exil. B 115, B 119.]
Hankinson, R. J., Cause and explanation in ancient Greek thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998.
[P. 45-49. Empedocles: structure and emergence; B 12, B 15, B 21, B 23, B 96, B 98.]
– “Reason, cause, and explanation in Presocratic philosophy,” in: The Oxford handbook of Presocratic philosophy, ed. P. Curd and D. W. Graham, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
Hâncu, Mihail-George, The terminology of ancient Greek cosmogonies, Diss. University Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti 2019.
[Emp.: p. 275-306. B 6, B 8, B 17, B 20, B 31, B 71, B 129, B 134. Pap. Strasbourg. Eros, ἔρως.]
Hardie, Alex, “Empedocles and the Muse of the agathos logos,” American Journal of Philology, 134, 2, 2013, p. 209-246.
[B 3, B 4, Β 23, B 110, B 131, B 133, B 134.]
– “The formation of an Augustan elegist: Empedocles and Propertius’ ‘Monobiblos’,” in: Word and context in Latin poetry. Studies in memory of David West, ed. A. J. Woodman & J. Wisse, Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society 2017, p. 61-87.
[A 98, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 20, B 30, B 98, B 101, B 115, B 122, B 124, B 134.]
Hardie, Philip Russel, Virgil’s Aeneid. Cosmos and imperium, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986.
– “The speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean epos,” The Classical Quarterly, 45, 1995, p. 204-214.
– Lucretian receptions. History, the sublime, knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009. [B 8, B 17, B 30, B 61, B 112, B 115, B 146.]
– “The Ars poetica and the poetics of didactic,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, 72 (New Approaches to Horace’s Ars poetica), 2014, p. 43-54.
– (ed.) Augustan poetry and the irrational, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
– “Horace et le sublime empédocléen,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 263-282.
[B 23, B 61, B 77, B 117, B 129, B 134.]
Hardy, Edmund, Der Begriff der Physis in der griechischen Philosophie, I, Berlin: Weidmann 1884.
[P. 21-22, B 8.]
Harles, G. C. [Harless, Gottlieb Christoph], Programma IV de Empedocle, num ille merito possit magiae accusari, Erlangen 1788-1790
[non vidi.]
Harper, Vicki, L., “The Presocratics,” in: The history of evil in Antiquity: 2000 BCE-450 CE, ed. Tom P. S. Angier, London-New York: Routledge 2019, p. 104-124.
Harris, William, Vernon, Dreams and Experience in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge (Mass.)-London: Harvard University Press, 2009.
[P. 237-240. Empedocles and his theory of dreams, ad B 108.]
Harrison, Jane Ellen, The prolegomena to the study of Greek religion, Cambridge 1908.
Harvey, Edmund, Newton, A history of luminescence: from the earliest times until 1900, Philadelphie, The American philosophical society, 1957.
Hatem, Jad, Empédocle, Qohélet, Bar Hebraeus, Paris: Orizons 2015, (La main d'Athéna).
Haussleiter, Johannes, Der Vegetarismus in der Antike, Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann 1935.
[P. 157-163 et passim. The passage on Empedocles is strongly dependent on Diels’ translations of fragments and Wilamowitz’s commentaries in SPAW 1929. Not very informative.]
Heath, Thomas L., Aristarchus of Samos: the ancient Copernicus. A history of Greek astronomy to Aristarchus together with Aristarchus’s treatise [...], Oxford: Clarendon Press 1913.
[Empedocles: p. 86-93, reprint in Greek in 2005 below.]
– Αρίσταρχος ο Σάμιος, ο αρχαίος Κοπέρνικος, μτφρ. Θ. Γραμμένος, Αθήνα: Κέντρο Έρευνας Επιστήμης και Εκπαίδευσης [«Κ.Ε.ΕΠ.ΕΚ.»], 2005.
[P. 82-89 « Εμπεδοκλής ».]
Hedericus, Beniamin, Sphaera Empedoclis, notis, cum suis, tum Q. Septimii Florentis Christiani, illustrata, ad orationes de astronomiae instauribus... invitat B. H., Typ. J. Ridelii, Dresdae 1711.
[B 161.]
Heeren, Arnold, Hermann, Ludwig, Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum physicarum et ethicarum, libri duo. Partis primae tomus prior, Physica continens, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1792.
[P. 286-290: B 6, B 17.7-8, B 20.2-5.]
– Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum physicarum et ethicarum, libri duo. Partis primae tomus alter, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1794.
[P. 895: B 115.]
– Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum physicarum et ethicarum, libri duo: Partis secundae tomus alter, variantes lectiones, commentationem de fontibus Eclogarum I. S. et indices continens, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1801.
Heerkens, Gerardus Nicolai [Gerard Nicolaas], Empedocles sive physicorum epigrammatum libri quinque, Groningae: H. Vechner 1783.
– Empedocles sive physicorum epigrammatum libri septem, Groningen: H. Vechner 1788. (Reprint 1798.)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, “Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie,” in: Hegel’s Werke, ed. von K. L. Michelet et alii, Bände XIII-XV, Berlin 1833-1837, Band XIII, 1833, p. 269-275.
[Hegel’s lectures from 1805 to 1830.]
Heidel, William Arthur, “Qualitative change in Pre-Socratic philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 19, 1906, p. 353-379.
– “On certain fragments of the Pre-Socratics,” Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences, 48, 1913, p. 725-729.
[B 109, B 110, B 101.]
– “Περι φύσεως: A study of the conception of nature among the Pre-Socratics,” Proceedings of the American Academy Arts and Sciences, 45, 1910, p. 79-133.
Heinimann, Felix, Nomos und Physis. Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im Griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt AG 1945.
[P. 48-9, 84-5, 89-90, 153 (B 9), 89-90, 153 (B 8), 85 (B 17.22: νομίζεσθαι), 91-2 (B 63.]
Heinze, Richard, Xenokrates: Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente, Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1892.
[Emp.: p.86-87. B 21.12 or B 23.8, B 115.]
Heneveld, Amy, “Concordia discors : l’harmonie de récriture médiévale,” Médiévales (Presses Universitaires de Vincennes), 66, (Harmonie Disharmonie), 2014, p. 25-41.
Herington, C. J., “A study in the Prometheia. Part I. The elements in the trilogy,” Phoenix, 17, 3, 1963, p. 180-197.
[B 6, B 17.]
Hermann, Gottfried, Draconis Stratonicensis liber De metris poeticis. Ioannis Tzetzae in Homeri Iliadem, Leipzig: Weigel 1812.
[Exeg. In Iliad. 42.17-26: storm of the elements. A 66.]
Hernández Castro, David, (2018) “El temenos de Apolo y Aristeas en Metaponto. Una aproximación a la influencia de Delfos sobre la Magna Grecia,” Ilu (Madrid), 23, 2018, p. 111-128.
https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ILUR/article/view/61023/4564456547736
– (2019) “Aphrodite Ζείδωρος: the subversion of the myth of Prometheus and Pandora,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 13, 2, 2019, p. 430-450.
https://nsu.ru/classics/schole/13/13-2-castro.pdf
[B 128, B 130, B 136, B 151.]
– (2019) “Buscando a Empédocles. Vivir y morir como un cantor de Apolo,” in: Morir antes de morir. Ritos de iniciación y experiencias místicas en la historia de la cultura, ed. Javier Alvarado Planas & David Hernández de la Fuente, Madrid: Dykinson 2019, p. 117-142.
https://www.academia.edu/40470061/Buscando_a_Emp%C3%A9docles._Vivir_y_morir_como_un_cantor_de_Apolo
[B 111, B 112.]
– (2019) “Empedocles without horseshoes. Delphi’s criticism of large sacrifices,” Symposion, 6, 2, 2019, p. 129-146.
http://symposion.acadiasi.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019.6.2.2.-Castro-1.pdf
[B 128, B 137, B 139.]
– (2019) “La estructura topográfica del pensamiento presocrático,” Araucaria, 21, 41, 2019, p. 139-159.
https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/araucaria/article/download/5246/7697
[A 1, B 17, B 55, B 112.]
– (2020) “Las Purificaciones de Apolo: revolución, ritual y mito en Empédocles de Akragas,” Pensamiento al margen, 12, 2020, p. 135-203. (On-line journal ISSN: 2386-6098).
www.pensamientoalmargen.com.)
https://pensamientoalmargen.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/10.-Herna%CC%81ndez-Las-Purificaciones-de-Apolo.pdf
[Stimulating - B 1, B 2, B 3, B 17, B 21, B 29, B 111, B 112, B 117, B 115, B 129, B 131, B 132, B 134, B 137, B 139, B 146, d5-6 MP.]
– (2020) Empédocles, cantor de Apolo. El lugar de la democracia y la estructura topográfica, narrativa y ritual de las Purificaciones, diss., Programa de doctorado en Filosofía, UNED, 2020.
[A learned dissertation, ‘sobresaliente cum laude’.]
http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/view/tesisuned:ED-Pg-Filosofia-Dhernandez
http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/tesisuned:ED-Pg-Filosofia-Dhernandez/HERNANDEZ_CASTRO_DAVID_Tesis.pdf
– “The Theophania of Apollo: a new approach to the Proem of Parmenides and the topography of the sanctuary of Delphi,” Erga-Logoi, 11, 2, 2023, p. 29-75. (On-line)
[A 1, A 2, B 1, B 112, B 131.]
Herrero de Jáuregui, Miguel, (2005) “Le pluriel de dédain dans la réflexion religieuse des Présocratiques,” Revue de Philosophie ancienne, XXIII, 2, 2005, p. 53-74.
[B 11, B 112, B 124, B 141, B 146, B 147.]
– (2010) Orphism and Christianity in late antiquity, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter 2010, (Sozomena, Studies in the Recovery of Ancient Texts, 7).
[B 6, B 17, B 115, B 117, B 126.]
– (2013) “Salvation for the wanderer: Odysseus, the gold leaves, and Empedocles,” in: Philosophy and salvation in Greek religion, ed. V. Adluri, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2013, (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten, 60), p. 29-57.
[B 3, B 20, B 23, B 84, B 112, B 115, B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.]
– (2016) “Trust the god! Tharsein in Greek religion,” Harvard studies in Classical Philology, 108, 2016, p. 1-52.
[The Muse. B 3, B 115, B 131.]
– (2017) “L’hostilité des éléments cosmiques, d’Homère à Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 130, 1, 2017, p. 23-42.
[B 115.]
– (2017) “Ipsissima verba de la Musa: Empédocles B 3.6-13 y B 111 DK,” in: Ratna: Homenaje a Julia Mendoza, ed. J. A Álvarez-Pedrosa, A. Bernabé, E. Luján, F. Presa, Madrid: Escolar y Mayo 2017, p. 233-241.
[B 3, B 111, B 131.]
– (2018) “Protreptic and poetry: Hesiod, Parmenides, Empedocles,” in: When wisdom calls. Philosophical protreptic in Antiquity, ed. Olga Alieva, Annemaré Kotzé & Sophie van der Meeren, Turnhout: Brepols 2018, (Monothéismes et philosophie), p. 49-69.
[The Muse. B 3, B 11, B 17, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 131, B 146, B 147. a(ii) 21-22.]
– (2020) “Eros en la literatura orfica,” in: Eros en la literatura griega, ed. J. A. López Férez, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas 2020, p. 1-14.
Herrero de Jauregui, M., et al. (ed.), Tracing Orpheus: studies of orphic fragments in honour of Alberto Bernabé, De Gruyter 2011, (Sozomena, 10).
Hershbell, Jackson P., (1968) “Empedocles’ oral Style,” The Classical Journal, 63, 1968, p. 352-357.
– (1970) “Hesiod and Empedocles,” The Classical Journal, 65, 1970, p. 145-161.
– (1971) “Plutarch as a source for Empedocles re-examined,” The American Journal of Philology, 92, 2, 1971, p. 156-184.
[B 5, B 8, B 24, B 25, B 27, B 76, B 115, B 122.]
– (1973) “Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a source for Empedocles re-examined,” Phronesis, 18.2, p. 97-114, and 18.3, p.187-203, 1973.
[B 6, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 131.]
– (1974) “The idea of Strife in early Greek thought,” The Personalist, 55, 1974, p. 205-215.
– (1974) “Empedoclean influences on the Timaeus,” Phoenix, 28, 2, 1974, p. 145-166.
Heyne, Christian Gottlob, “Vorrede,” in: Dieterich Tiedemann, System der stoischen Philosophie, Erster Theil, Leipzig: Bey Weidmanns Erben und Reich 1776, p. III–XVIII.
[Emp.: pages VIII-IX: B6; Nestis: Persephone; Aïdôneus: earth.]
Hicks, R. D., Aristotle: De anima. With translation, introduction and notes, Cambridge: University Press 1907.
[B 96, B 106, B 108, B 109.]
– Diogenes Laertius. Lives of eminent philosophers, 2 volumes, London-New York: W. Heinemann / G. P. Putnam’s sons 1925, (Loeb Classical Library, 184, 185).
[Emp. in volume II, Book VIII, p. 366-390.]
Hild, Joseph-Antoine, Étude sur les démons dans la littérature et la religion des Grecs, Paris: Hachette 1881.
[Emp.: p. 228-234.]
– “Daemon,” in: Dictionnaire des Antiquités Grecques et Romaines, ed. Ch. Daremberg & E. Saglio, Paris 1892, p. 9-19.
Hillgruber, Michael, Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero - Teil 2 - Kommentar zu den Kapiteln 74–218, Stuttgart-Leipzig: Teubner 1999, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 58).
[B 6, B 17, B 22, B 42, B 65, B 71, B 128.]
Hladký, Vojtěch, (2002) “Vítkův Empedoklés,” Souvislosti, 3-4, 53-54, 2002, p. 194-202.
[A review of Tomáš Vítek’s Empedocles, I.]
http://www.souvislosti.cz/3402/hla.html
– (2006) “Empedokleův Sfairos,” Filosofický časopis, 3/54, 2006, p. 393-410.
[In Czech, English summary.]
– (2008) “Empedokleův Sfairos očima antických interpretů,” Listy filologické (Folia philologica), 2008, 131, 1, p. 379-439.
[See an English abstract: http://lf.clavmon.cz/. A recent English translation of the whole text by Anna Pilátová can be supplied by Vojtěch Hladký on demand - vojtechhladky@gmail.com - or by empedocles.acragas.]
– (2010) “Reinkarnující se duše mezi Presokratiky a Platónem,” Reflexe, 38, 2010, p. 19-34.
[Emp.: p. 22-24.]
– (2014) “Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, I: Aristotle and the neoplatonists,” Eirene, 50, 1-2, 2014, p. 149-164.
– (2015) “Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, II: Plato’s Timaeus and Statesman,” Eirene, 51, 2015, p. 71-98.
– (2016) “Empedocles’ Sphairos and its interpretations in Antiquity, III: zoogony and Plato’s Symposium,” Eirene, 52, 1-2, 2016, p. 359-383.
[A 72, B 20, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 42, B 45, B 47, B 61, B 62, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 124.]
– (2017) “Empedocles’ Sphairos,” Rhizomata, 5, 1, 2017, p. 1-24.
[Wrongly given on-line in July 2018 by De Gruyter as Volume 9 – instead of 5. A 47, A 50, A 72, B 6, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 62, B 110, B 134.]
– (2018) “Transmigrating soul between the Presocratics and Plato,” Aither, international issue n°5, 2018, p. 20-49.
http://aither.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/A20.pdf
– (2024) “Patrizi, panpsychism, and the Presocratics,” Intellectual History Review, online, 2024, p. 1-28. https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rihr20
https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2023.2283921
Hladký, Vojtěch et alii, Evoluce před Darwinem: Nejstarší vývojová stadia evoluční nauky, Praha: Pavel Mervart 2013.
[P. 71-86. Evolution before arwin. Chap. Empedocles: The cycle of life; a partly popular, partly original interpretation of E. zoology in the context of his cosmology; the text is written in Czech.]
Hoessly, Fortunat, “2.4. Empedokles,” in: Katharsis: Reinigung als Heilverfahren, Studien zum Ritual der archaischen und klassischen Zeit sowie zum Corpus Hippocraticum, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, (Hypomnemata, 135), 2001, p. 188-197.
[B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 129, B 136, B 137, B 146.]
Höfer, Ferdinand, “Zur Lehre von der sinnlichen Wahrnehmung im 4. Buche des Lukrez,” in: Zu der öffentlichen Prüfung des Gymnasiums zu Seehausen in der Altmark und zur Vorfeier des Geburtsfestes Sr. Majestät des Kaisers und Königs und zur Entlassung der Abiturienten am 20. und 21. März 1872 zu ergebenst einladen Dir. Aug. Dihle, Stendal: Franzen & Große 1872, p. 1-24.
[B 84.]
Hoffmann, R. Joseph, Celsus. On the true doctrine: a discourse against the Christians, translated with a general introduction by R. J. H., New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press 1987.
[Emp. p. 122. B 115.]
Hoffmann-Loß, Herbert, Die Wiedergabe der Empedokleischen Physik durch Aristoteles, diss., Göttingen 1966.
[B 6, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 35, B 36, B 37, B 39, B 59, B 62, B 96, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 133, B 134, B 135.]
Hollenberg, Wilhelm, “Empedoclea,” in: Jahresbericht über das Königliche Joachimsthalsche Gymnasium, Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1853, p. 1-31.
[De prooemio Empedoclis: p. 1-17, De cognoscendi facultate: p. 17-31.]
Holmes, Brooke, The symptom and the subject: the emergence of the physical body in ancient Greece, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2010.
[A 70, A 86, A 95, B 8, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 62, B 65, B 105, B 110, B 112, B 134, B 136.]
Hölscher, Uvo, (1965) “Weltzeiten und Lebenzyklus: eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie,” Hermes, 93, 1965, p. 7-33
[= reprinted in U. Hölscher, Anfängliches Fragen: Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen: 1968, p. 173-212.]
– (1965) Empedokles und Hölderlin, Frankfurt am Main: Insel 1965.
[The second actualized edition was published like Schriften der Hölderlin-Gesellschaft 21, Eggingen: Isele 1998.]
– (1968) Anfängliches Fragen. Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1968.
[Emp.: p. 173-212. B 6, B 8, B 12, B 17, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 35, B 110, B 123.]
– (1976) “Der Sinn von Sein in der älteren griechischen Philosophie,” Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, 3/1976, Heidelberg 1976.
– (1991) “Heraklit über göttliche und menschliche Weisheit,” in: Weisheit. Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation III, ed. Aleida Assmann, Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag 1991, p. 73-80.
[P. 77-78. B 3.3, B 2.9, B 113, B 112.4-5.]
Holton, Stephanie, Sleep and dreams in early Greek thought: Presocratic and Hippocratic approaches, London-New York: Routledge 2022, (Medicine and the Body in Antiquity).
[3.1.3 Empedocles: p. 80-83. More: p. 92-93, 126. 164-165. – 28 A 46b, 31 A 84, A 8, A 86, B 98, B 100, B 105, B 108, B 115, B 117, B 126. Blood and heat. Life, sleep and death.]
Holwerda, Douwe, Commentatio de vocis quae est φύσις vi atque usu praesertim in Graecitate Aristotele anteriore, Gröningen 1955.
– (ed.) Jo. Tzetzae commentarii in Aristophanem, Scholia in Aristophanem, 4.2, Nubes, ed. D. Holwerda, Groningen: J. B. Wolters 1960.
[A 49, B 38.4.]
–“Zu Empedokles fr. 20 D-K,” Mnemosyne, 4/50, 1997, p. 320-321.
[B 20.]
Hommel, Hildebrecht, “Cetera mitte, zu Archilochus, Horaz, Euripides und Empedokles,” Gymnasium, 58, 1951, p. 218-227.
Hooykaas, Reijer, Het begrip element in zijn historisch-wijsgerige ontwikkeling, Diss. Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1933.
Hopkins, Phil, “"As he says in his poetical Way": Anaximander and Empedocles on the motive forces of Kosmos,” in: A Companion to ancient philosophy, ed. S. D. Kirkland & E. Sanday, Evanston: Northwestern University Press 2018, (Rereading ancient Philosophy), p. 53-66.
[B 17, B 35, B 105, B 110, B 115, B 135.]
Horky, Phillip, Sidney, Plato and Pythagoreanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
[Emp.: p. 179-183, 219-220. A 29, A 86, B 17, B 26, B 115.]
– “Empedocles democraticus: Hellenistic biography at the intersection of philosophy and politics,” in: Bios philosophos. Philosophy in ancient Greek biography, Proceedings of the 2013 Diatribai di Gargnano, ed. M. Bonazzi & S. Schorn, Turnhout: Brepols 2016, (Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, 4), p. 37-70.
– “When did the kosmos become the kosmos,” in: Cosmos in the ancient world, ed. P. S. Horky, Cambridge University Press 2019, p. 22-41.
[A 47, A 50, A 58, B 26, B 53-54, B 100, B 115, B 134, B 136.]
Horna, Constantinus, “Empedocleum,” Wiener Studien, 48, 1930, p. 3-11.
[B 134, B 29, A 1, par. 77, A 2, B 160.]
Horsfall, Nicholas, Virgil, Aeneid 6, A commentary, volume 1: introduction, text and translation, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013.
[B 121.]
Huby, Pamela & C.C.W. Taylor, Simplicius. On Aristotle, Physics 1.3-4, translated by P. H & C.C.W. T., London: Bristol Classical Press 2011, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle).
[Simplicius p. 102.16 - 179.19; B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26.]
Huffman, Carl A., (1999) “The Pythagorean tradition,” in: The Cambridge Companion to early Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge 1999, p. 66-87.
[P. 75-78: Emp. as a Pythagorean; B 137, B 115, B 112.]
– (2006) “Aristoxenus’ Pythagorean Precepts: A rational Pythagorean ethic,” in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa: Edizione della Normale 2006, p. 103-121.
[P. 108, n. 4 A 95.]
– (2009) “The Pythagorean conception of the soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus,” in: Body and soul in ancient philosophy, ed. D. Frede D. & B. Reis, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2009, p. 21-43.
[B 115, B 135, B 138.]
– (2014) (ed.), A history of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014.
Hüffmeier, Friedrich, “Phronesis in den Schriften des Corpus Hippocraticum,” Hermes, 89, 1, 1961, p. 51-84.
[In part II, Phronesis in der Schrift De flatibus, p. 65-68: A 78, A 85, A 86.11, B 105, B 108, B 110. In part III, Phronesis in der Schrift De Victu, p. 71-74: B 100: the author of De victu supposes the breathing by means of skin as just Empedocles did.]
Hug, Johann, Leonhard, Untersuchungen über den Mythos der berühmtern Völker der alten Welt [...], Freiburg 1823².
[First ed.: 1812; p. 102-103 in both ed.: Nestis, B 6.]
Huit, Charles, La philosophie de la nature chez les Anciens, Paris: A. Fontemoing 1901.
[Emp.: p. 300-306.]
Hunger, Herbert, “Palimpsest-Fragmente aus Herodians Καθολικὴ προσῳδία,” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinischen Gesellschaft, 16, 1967, p. 1-33.
[B 153b.]
Hunter, Richard, Apollonius of Rhodes, Argonautica, Book IV, ed. R. H., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, (Cambridge Greek and Latin classics).
[A 72, B 57, B 61, B 71, B 89, B 124.]
– “Hesiod and the Presocratics: A Hellenistic perspective?,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 57-78.
[A 1.57, A 21, A 22, A 25, A 27, A 37, B 55.]
– “Regius urget: Hellenising thoughts on Latin intratextuality,” in: Intratextuality and Latin literature, ed. S. Harrison, S. Frangoulidis & T.D. Papanghelis, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2018, (Trends in Classics, supplementary volumes, 69), p. 451-469.
[A 72, B 3, B 23, B 57, B 61, B 111, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 117.]
Hussey, Edward, The Presocratics, London: Duckworth 1972. Reprint: Bristol Classical Press 2010.
Hutten, Johann, Georg, Plutarchi Chaeronensis quae supersunt omnia […] Plutarchi operum moralium et philosophicorum, pars quarta, T. X, Tübingen: J. G. Cotta 1798.
[B 115: p. 387.]
Hyland, Drew A., The origins of philosophy: its rise in myth and the Pre-socratics. A collection of early writings selected, edited, and with explanatory essays, New York: Capricorn Books 1973.
[Emp.: p. 237-265. [ + ].]
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, (2004) “Empedocles and the ancient painters,” in: Colour in the ancient mediterranean world, ed. Liza Cleland, Karen Stears & Glanys Davies, Oxford: John and Erica Hedges 2004, (Bar British Archaeological Report, International series, 1267), p. 91-95.
[Reprint in 2016 by Bar Publishing in Oxford. Skiagraphia. A 86, A 92, B 21, B 23, B 71, B 96, B 107.]
– (2005) “Empedocles on colour and colour vision,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, 2005, p. 1-37.
http://www.oup.co.uk/pdf/0-19-928744-9.pdf
[A 37, A 43, A 57, A 70, A 72, A 78, A 86, A 90, A 91, A 92, B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 33, B 34, B 35, B 50, B 61, B 67, B 71, B 84, B 91, B 93, B 94, B 96, B 98, B 107, 109.]
– (2009) “Basic and mixed colors in Empedocles and Plato,” in: L’Antiquité en couleurs : Catégories, Pratiques, Représentations, ed. Marcello Carastro, Grenoble: Jerôme Millon 2009.
– (2016) “Review of Kalderon M.E., Form without matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on color perception,” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2016.01.32.
[A 86, B 84.]
– (2019) “Theophrastus on Plato’s theory of vision,” Rhizomata, 7, 2, 2019, (Special issue: Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus), p. 249-268.
Ilievsky, Viktor, “The Presocratics on the origin of evil,” Religions, 15(10), 1260, 2024, p. 1-21. On-line:
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/10/1260
[Emp.: p. 10-13.]
Imbraguglia, Giorgio et alii (ed.), Index Empedocleus. 1 & 2, Genova: Erga 1991, (Le opere e i giorni)
[[+ +].]
– “La situazione del discorso di Empedocle,” in: Index Empedocleus. Le opere e i giorni I-II, ed. G. Imbraguglia et alii, Genova: Erga 1991, p. 11-35.
Imhoof, Stefan, “Review of Alain Martin, Olivier [sic] Primavesi, L'Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666),” Revue de théologie et de philosophie, 133, 51, 4, 2001, p. 513-514.
– “Zeus ou tourbillon : querelle sur l’origine du monde,” Revue de théologie et de philosophie, 149, 3-4, 2017, p. 273-290.
[B 35, B 115.]
Immisch, Otto, “Sprachliches zum Seelenschmetterling,” Glotta, 6, 1915, p. 193-206.
[Pages 197-202: a contribution to genesis of the idea of body as an envelope of soul; ad B 126.]
Indelli, Giovanni, “Filodemo ed Empedocle,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 277-288.
Inwood, Brad, (1984), “Review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Ancient Philosophy, 4, 1, 1984, p. 99-101.
– (1992) The Poem of Empedocles. A text and translation with an introduction, Toronto-Buffalo-London: University of Toronto Press 1992, (Phoenix Presocratics, III). Revised edition, Toronto-Buffalo-London: University of Toronto Press 2001.
[+ +]
– (1996) “Empedocles,” in: The Oxford Classical Dictionary, third edition, ed. S. Hornblower & A. Spawforth, Oxford: Oxford University Press 19963, p. 523.
– (1997) “Empedocles,” in: Encyclopedia of classical philosophy, ed. D. J. Zeyl, D. T. Devereux & P. T. Mitsis, Westport (Conn.): Greenwood Press, London-Chicago (Ill.): Fitzroy Deaborn 1997, p. 203-206.
– (1999) “Empedocles fragments,” The Times Literary Supplement, Jul. 9, 1999, p. 17.
[Pap. Strasb.]
– (2000) “Review of A. Martin & O. Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg [...] 1998,” The Classical Review, 50, 1, 2000, p. 5-7.
– (2006) “Who do we think we are?,” in: The virtuous life in Greek ethics, ed. Burkhard Reis, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2006.
[P. 230-243. B 112, B 115, B 129.]
– (2009) “Empedocles and metempsychôsis: The critique of Diogenes of Oenoanda,” in: Body and soul in ancient philosophy, ed. Dorothea Frede & Burkhard Reis, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2009, p. 71-86.
– (2016) “Empedocles, c. 492–432 BCE,” in: Oxford Classical Dictionary, Digital ed., New York: Oxford University Press 2016.
Irby-Massie, Georgia L., “Prometheus Bound and contemporary trends in Greek natural philosophy,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 48, 2008, p. 137-157.
http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/911/991
[B6.]
Iribarren, Leopoldo, “Rationalisations de la croyance : La construction de la pistis comme philosophème chez Parménide et Empédocle,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, XXIV(1), 2006, p. 63-82.
– “Les peintres d‘Empédocle (DK 31 B23) : enjeux et portée d’une analogie préplatonicienne,” Philosophie antique, 13, 2013, p. 83-115.
[B 23.]
– Fabriquer le monde : technique et cosmogonie dans la poésie grecque archaïque, Paris: Classiques Garnier 2018, (Kaïnon- anthropologie de la pensée ancienne, 11).
[Empédocle: p. 165-209; B 2, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 84, B 100.]
Iribarren, Leopoldo & Hugo Koning (ed.), Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne Supplements, 455).
Işık, İlker, “Empedokles Felsefesinin Kökenleri, The origins of the Empedocles philosophy,” Turkish Studies - Social, 15, 8, 2020, p. 3565-3583.
https://dx.doi.org/10.47356/TurkishStudies.47029
Jabin, Misel, “La métaphore vestimentaire dans le Timée de Platon : de l’anthropologie du corps à la cosmologie,” in: Himation : métaphores du vêtement dans l'Antiquité classique et tardive, ed. Delalande J. et al., Pessac: Ausonius éditions 2024, (PrimaLun@ 30), p. 49-69.
[Open access https://una-editions.fr. B 126.]
Jackson, Henry, “On Empedocles apud Sextum Empiricum Adv. Math. VII.123,” Proceedings of the Cambridge philological Society, 61, 1902, p. 4-5.
[B2, B3.]
– “On Empedocles, fragment 17,” Proceedings of the Cambridge philological Society,76, 1907, p. 6.
[B 17.]
Jacobson, Howard, “Lucretius’ hunting souls (3, 726-728),” Museum Helveticum, 56, 1999, p. 33.
[B 58.]
– “Empedocles’ Cain,” Museum Helveticum, 59, 2002, p. 12.
[On parallelism between B 115 and Gen. 4.3-15.]
Jacobs, David, C., The Presocratics after Heidegger, Albany: State University of New York Press 1999, (SUNY series in contemporary continental philosophy).
Jacquemard, Simonne, Trois mystiques grecs : Orphée, Pythagore, Empédocle, Paris: Albin Michel 1997.
Jacques, Jean-Marie (ed.), Nicandre. Œuvres. Tome II - Les Thériaques. Fragments iologiques antérieurs à Nicandre, texte établi et traduit par J.-M. J., Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2002 (Collection des Universités de France, Budé, série grecque, 421).
– Nicandre. Œuvres. Tome III - Les Alexipharmaques. Lieux parallèles du Livre XIII des Iatrica d’Aétius, texte établi et traduit par J.-M. J., Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2007 (Collection des Universités de France, Budé, série grecque, 458).
Jaeckel, Johannes Friedrich, De poetarum Siculorum hexametro, diss., Leipzig 1902.
[An important comparative analysis of verses Emp. and the other poets; B 100.3, B 29.3; useful statistics.]
Jaeger, Werner, (1913) “Das Pneuma im Lykeion,” Hermes, 48, 1913, p. 29-74, p. 53-54.
[A 74.]
– (1938) Diokles von Karystos. Die griechische Medizin und die Schule des Aristoteles, Berlin: W. de Gruyter & Company 1938.
[A 34, A 742.]
– (1946) Paideia: the ideals of Greek culture, I. Archaic Greece, the mind of Athens, translated from the second German edition by G. Highet, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1946.
[First English edition: 1939; second English edition with notes: 1945, third English edition: 1946. P. 169: Orphism and natural philosophy of Ionia, B 115; p. 295: philosophical centaur.]
– (1947) The theology of the early Greek philosophers. The Gifford lectures 1936, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1947.
[Emp.: p. 128-154. In German: Die Theologie der frühen griechischen Denker, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer 1953. French translation (from German), W. Jaeger. À la naissance de la théologie : essai sur les Présocratiques, Paris: Les éditions du Cerf 1966.]
– (1959) “The Greek ideas of immortality,” Harvard Theological Review, 52, 3, 1959, p. 135-147.
[Pages 141-142: Empedoclean conception of soul - very traditionally meant - in the contemporary context; B 117, B 119.]
Jakoubek, Karel, Empedoklés a Sfairos, diss. Fakulta filozofická, Plzeň 2016.
[B 3, B 6, B 8, B 16, B 17, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 35, B 54, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 63, B 64, B 73, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 133, B 134, B 135.]
Jakubanis, Geirich, “Empedokl. Filosof, vrač i čarodej, dannyja dlja ego ponimanija i ocenki,” Kijevskija universitetskaja izvestija, 7 (ijul), 1905, p. 1-136.
[Empedocles philosopher, doctor and wonder/worker, evidence for his interpretation and evaluation. Reprinted in Kiev 1906 and in Moscow 19832; republished again under title Lukrecij, O prirode veščej II: Stati, kommentariji, fragmenty Epikura i Empedokla, ed. F. A. Petrovskij, Moskva 1947, p. 663-695; cf. also “Empédocle, fragments des poèmes De la nature et Purifications [partly translated, revisioned and commented by M. L. Gasparov],” Lucrèce 1983, p. 275-291 and 372-376. General study and translation of fragments according to Mullach’s edition.]
Janko, Richard, (1986) “Hesychius Θ 216 and Empedocles fragment 21.6,” Classical Philology, 81, 1986, p. 308-309.
[B 21.6.]
– (2004) “Empedocles, On Nature I 233-364: a New Reconstruction of P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1165-6,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 150, 2004, p. 1-26.
– (2005) Empedocles’ Physica Book 1: A New Reconstruction,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 93-135.
– (2010) “Review of Empedokles Physika I. Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs, by Oliver Primavesi. Berlin: De Gruyter 2008,” Ancient Philosophy, 30, 2, Fall 2010, p. 407-411.
– (2010) “Orphic cosmogony, hermeneutic necessity and the unity of the Derveni papyrus,” in: Orfeo y el orfismo, nuevas perspectivas, ed. A. Bernabé, F. Casadesús & M. A. Santamaría, Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes 2010, p. 178-191.
– (2017) “Empedocles’ On Nature frr. B 8–9 in the context of Plutarch’s Against Colotes,” The Classical Quarterly, 67, 2017, p. 1-6.
[B 8, B 9.]
Jannaccone, Sylvia, “Una reminiscenza dei Καθαρμοί nel carme 64 di Catullo,” Giornale italiano di filologia, 18, 1965, p. 127-130.
[B 115.10.]
Janssen, Tjitte H., “Νημερτής τ᾿ ἐρόεσσα μελάγκουρός τ᾿ ᾿Ασάφεια,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 104, 1987, p. 177-178.
[B 122.4.]
Jażdżewska, Katarzyna, “Love in many dimensions: Hesiod and Empedocles in Plutarch’s Amatorius,” in: The dynamics of intertextuality in Plutarch, ed. Th. S. Schmidt, M. Vamvouri & R. Hirsch-Luipold, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2020, (Brill’s Plutarch Studies, 5), p. 459-474.
[Eros and Ares, B 17, B 151.]
Jensen, Anthony K., “Ratiocination and Socrates’ daimonion: A practical solution,” The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter, 402, 2005, p. 0-12.
http://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/402/ http://orb.binghamton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1401&context=sagp
Jeremiah, Edward T., The emergence of reflexivity in Greek language and thought. From Homer to Plato and beyond, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2012, (“Philosophia Antiqua”, 129).
[P. 198-199. B 21.13-14, B 110.4-5.]
Jiráni, Otakar, “Sallustiova báseň Empedoclea,” Listy filologické / Folia philologica, 31, 1, 1904, p. 14-21.
[Sallust’s Poem on Empedocles. A 27.]
Joachim, Harold H., Aristotle: On coming-to-be & passing-away (De generatione et corruptione). A revised text with introduction and commentary by H. H. J., Oxford: Clarendon Press 1926.
[B 21.]
Jobst, Franz Xaver, Über das Verhältnis zwischen Lukretius und Empedokles, diss., Munich: Max Steinebach 1907.
https://archive.org/details/berdasverhltnis00jobsgoog
Joël, Karl, Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, I, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr 1921. [Emp., p. 488-565.]
Johansen, Thomas Kjeller, Aristotle on the sense-organs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997, (Cambridge classical studies).
[Emp.: p. 51-58, 61-62, 64-73, 87-89, 98. A 86, B 84.]
– “The principle that ‘like perceives like’ in Theophrastus’ De sensibus,” Rhizomata, 7, 2, 2019, (Special Issue: Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus), p. 226-248.
Johnson, Aaron P., Religion and identity in Porphyry of Tyre: the limits of Hellenism in late Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, (Greek culture in the Roman world).
[B 105, B 115.1-2. Stobaeus.]
Johnson, Edith, Henry, “Review of The Fragments of Empedocles by W. E. Leonard, 1908,” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 6, 7, 1909, p. 193.
Johnstone, Henry W., Empedocles’ Περὶ Φύσεως and Καθαρμοί, Bryn Mawr (Pennsylvania): Bryn Mawr College 1985, (Bryn Mawr Greek Commentaries).
Jolivet, Jean-Christophe, “Hercule, Cacus et Empédocle,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l'université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 283-302.
Jones, Howard, “Lucretius and nature’s monsters,” Helmantica 44, 1993, p. 199-203.
[Marginally on B 61.]
Jones, Roger Miller, “Posidonius and the flight of the mind through the universe,” Classical Philology, 21, 2, 1926, p. 97-113.
[B 119, B 147.]
Jori, Alberto, “La teoria aristotelica dei colori tra fisica e fisiologia,” Medicina nei secoli, 32, 2, 2020, p. 491-541.
[B 21, B 71, B 84.]
Jouanna, Jacques, (1961) “Présence d’Empédocle dans la Collection Hippocratique,” Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé, 20, 1961, p. 452-463.
– (1966) “La théorie de l’intelligence et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique ‘Du régime’: Ses rapports avec Empédocle et le ‘Timée’ de Platon,” Revue des études grecques, 79, 1966, p. xv-xviii.
– (1998) “L'interprétation des rêves et la théorie micro-macrocosmique dans le traité hippocratique Du régime : sémiotique et mimesis,” in: Text and tradition. Studies in ancient medicine and its transmission presented to Jutta Kollesch, ed. Klaus-Dietrich Fischer – Diethard Nickel & Paul Potter, Leiden: Brill 1998, p. 161-174, p. 172-173.
[DK 31 B 100: ad Hüffmeier and the Hippocratics.]
– (2007) “La théorie de la sensation, de la pensée et de l’âme dans le traité hippocratique du Régime : ses rapports avec Empédocle et le Timée de Platon,” AION (Annali dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”), 29, 2007, p. 9-39.
– (2012) “The theory of sensation, thought and the soul in the Hippocratic treatise Regimen: Its connections with Empedocles and Plato’s Timaeus,” in: J. Jouanna, Greek medicine from Hippocrates to Galen. Selected papers, translated by N. Allies, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2012, p. 195-228.
[B 105.]
Jourdan, Fabienne, “Manger Dionysos. L'interprétation du mythe du démembrement par Plutarque a-t-elle été lue par les néo-Platoniciens ?,” Pallas, 67, 2005, p. 153-174.
[B 115, De esu 996 B-C.]
Jourdan, Fabienne & Rainer Hirsch-Luipold (ed.), Die Wurzel allen Übels. Vorstellungen über die Herkunft des Bösen und Schlechten in der Philosophie und Religion des 1.–4. Jahrhunderts. Ratio Religionis Studien III, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2014, (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum, 91)
Journée, Gérard, "Rien ne saurait naître de rien" - L'émergence du problème de l'être dans la philosophie pré-platonicienne, Diss., Université Lille IIII, janvier 2007.
http://documents.univ-lille3.fr/files/pub/www/recherche/theses/JOURNEE_Gerard.pdf
[Emp.: p. 468-520 – .B 8, B 11, B 12, B 15.]
– “Empédocle, B6 DK : Remarques sur les deux lignées de Diels,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, VI, 11, 2012, p. 32-62. On-line:
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/41/544
[B 6.]
– “Dualités présocratiques,” in: Dualismes. Doctrines religieuses et traditions philosophiques, ed. F. Jourdan & A. Vasiliu, Hors-série Χώρα · REAM, 2015, p. 113-140.
[Emp.: p. 131-139.]
Judet de La Combe, Pierre, “Abstraction et récit dans le poème thébain de Stésichore,” in: Poésie et lyrique antiques, ed. L. Dubois, Villeneuve d’Ascq : Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 1996, p. 11-27.
[La réplique de Jocaste. Philotès, Neîkos.]
– L’Agamemnon d’Eschyle : Commentaire des dialogues, II, Villeneuve d’Ascq : Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 2001, (Cahiers de philologie, 18).
[Emp.: p. 555-558, in “Quatrième épisode. Scène de Cassandre (v. 1035-1330)” Comment on v. 1282, “L’Orestie et les Catharmes d’Empédocle”. B 105, B 112.6, B 115.3 and 13, B 137; on mutual influence Emp. and Aesch.]
– Zeus transformeur : Pourquoi les dieux changent-ils si souvent d’apparence ?, Montrouge: Bayard 2020, (Les petites conférences).
[Emp.: p. 80-81.]
Jurado López, Manuel, “No es mal momento para recordar a Empédocles,” in: Los dioses vulnerables, Sevilla: Algaida 2008, (Algaida poesía; 60), p. 33-35.
Jurasz, Izabela, “"Empédocle gnostique" et le dualisme selon Hippolyte de Rome (Refutatio VII, 29-31),” Laval théologique et philosophique, 74, 3, 2018, p. 375-405.
[B 6, B 16, B 17, B 115, B 110, B 131.]
– “Comment retourner à Ithaque ? Le voyage d’Ulysse selon les platoniciens, gnostiques et chrétiens,” Revue d’études augustiniennes patristiques, 68, 1, 2022, p. 1-23.
[B 20, B 110, B 119.]
Kafka, Gustav, “Empedokles von Akragas,” in: G. Kafka, Die Vorsokratiker, Geschichte der Philosophie in Einzeldarstellungen. Abt. II. Die Philosophie des Abendlandes im Altertum, Band 6, Munich: E. Reinhadt 1921, p. 84-103, p. 156-159.
– “Zur Physik des Empedokles,” Philologus, 78, 1923, p. 202-229.
– “Zu Theophrasts De sensu,” Philologus, 72, 1913, p. 65-82.
[B 99.]
Kahle, Madayo, “OF 437 and the transformation of the soul,” in: Tracing Orpheus. Studies of Orphic fragments in honour of Alberto Bernabé, ed. Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui et alii, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2011, (Sozomena: Studies in the recovery of ancient texts, 10), p. 153-157.
[P. 156: B 115, daimôn; a very brief notice.]
– “Empédocles y la pañcāgnividyā”, in: Esta Toledo, aquella Babilonia: Convivencia e interacción en las sociedades del Oriente y del Mediterráneo Antiguos, ed. J.-A. Belmonte & J. Oliva, Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM) 2011, (Estudios, 131), 429-442.
Kahn, Charles H., (1958) “Panpsychism and immortality in Empedocles,” The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter, 94, Paper presented before the 1958 meeting of the Society for ancient Greek philosophy in Cincinnati, Ohio, 1958.
http://orb.binghamton.edu/sagp/94
http://orb.binghamton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context=sagp
– (1960) Anaximander and the origins of Greek cosmology, New York: Columbia University Press 1960.
[A 56, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 38, B 100, B 129, B 134.]
– (1960) “Religion and natural philosophy in Empedocles’ doctrine of the soul,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 42, 1, 1960, p. 3-35.
[Reprint in Essays in ancient Greek philosophy, ed. J. P. Anton & G. L. Kustas, Albany: SUNY 1971, p. 3-38, with appendix 'Empedocles among the Shamans' omitted latter. A revised version of the article was published in: The Pre-Socratics, ed. A. P. D. Mourelatos, Doubleday/Anchor Press 1974, then Princeton University Press 1993, p. 426-456. B 115.]
– (1969) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle, I,” Gnomon, 41, 1969, p. 439-447.
[Important.]
– (1969) “Empedocles,” in: MacMillan’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy, II. London 1969, p. 496-499.
– (1979) The art and thought of Heraclitus. An edition of the fragments with translation and commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1979.
[Cosmic cycles. B 17, B 27, B 35, B 59, B 96, B 105, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 126, B 134.]
– (2001) Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans. A brief history, Indianapolis–Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 2001.
[P. 17-18. Emp. appears as an inspired but idiosyncratic follower of Pythagoras. P. 24-25: Harmonia, B 96.]
– (2003) “Writing philosophy: prose and poetry from Thales to Plato,” in: Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, ed. H. Yunis, Cambridge University Press 2003, p. 139-161.
[Empedocles: p. 158.]
Kaianidi (Kayanidi), Leonid (Каяниди, Л.Г.), “Vyacheslav Ivanov’s tragedy Prometheus in the light of ancient natural philosophy (Parmenides, Empedocles, Plato, Plutarch),” Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 73, 2021, p. 191-208.
Kaibel, Georg, “Die Prolegomena Περὶ κωμῳδίας,” Abhandlungen der königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologische - historische Klasse, Neue Folge Band 2, 4, Berlin, Weidmann 1898, p. 3-70, p. 20-21.
[A 251.]
– Comicorum graecorum fragmenta, I, Berlin: Weidmann 1899, (Poetarum graecorum fragmenta, 6).
[Tzetzes. B 122, p. 28.]
Kalaš, Andrej & Panagiotis Geropoulos, “Empedocles cosmic cycle and origin of life or from monsters to divine Sphairos,” in: Hortus Graeco-Latinus Cassoviensis IV, Košice (Slovakia) 2024, p. 159-174. On-line.
[A 1, A 28, A 72, B 17, B 27 B 29, B 61, B 62, B 115.]
Kalderon, Mark Eli, Form without matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on color perception, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015.
[B 8, B 21, B 23, B 71, B 84, B 94, B 96. The bibliography concerning Empedocles in this book does not go farther than 2009, and is quite exclusively in English. As of 2000 only four names: Baltussen 2000, Ierodiakonou 2005, Inwood 2001, Kamtekar 2009, No Greek, just translations by Inwood.]
Kalligas, Paul, “Some new Plotinian emendations,” Emerita, 56, 1, 1988, p. 95-102.
[§ 6, p. 99-100 (Enn. IV, 8,1, 17-20), B 115.13-14. According to Kalligas, ἥκειν is just a false variant of νείκει inserted in its place. Besides, the author supports εἶμι instead of εἰμί.]
– The Enneads of Plotinus. A commentary, Volume 1, translated by Elizabeth Key Fowden and Nicolas Pilavachi, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2014.
[Emp.: p. 488, B 115.5. P. 517, A 90, A 92, B 84. P. 521, B 6.]
– The Enneads of Plotinus. A commentary, Volume 2, Translated by Nickolaos Koutras, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2023.
[Emp.: p. 201, B 115.4, 13-14.]
Kalogerakos, Ioannis G., Seele und Unsterblichkeit. Untersuchungen zur Vorsokratik bis Empedokles, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, Band 52, Stuttgart-Leipzig: Teubner 1996.
[Emp.: p. 268-329. Gathering of readings and of bibliographical references.]
– “Jenseits des Raums. Seelenreisen und Raumvorstellungen der Frühzeit,” in: Seelenreise und Katabasis: Einblicke ins Jenseits in antiker philosophischer Literatur. Akten der 21. Tagung der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung vom 30. Juli bis 1. August 2018 in Tübingen, ed. I. Männlein-Robert, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter, 2021, (Philosophie der Antike, 40), p. 13-34.
Kaluđerović, Željko, “Empedocles on ensouled beings,” Conatus, 8, 1, 2023, p. 167-183.
Kampakoglou, Alexandros, “Danaus βουγενής: Greco-Egyptian mythology and Ptolemaic kingship,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 56, 2016, p. 111-139.
[B 61.]
Kamtekar, Rachana, “Knowing by likeness in Empedocles,” Phronesis, 54, 3, 2009, p. 215-238.
[B 2, B 3, B 17, B 22, B 23, B 55, B 71, B 73, B 79, B 82, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 106, B 109, B 110.]
Karakirisidis, Ioannis, “The Sapphic Aphrodite: a multifaceted (ποικιλόθρονος) Divinity,” CHS Research Bulletin, 12, 2024. Online, no page numbering.
Karatzoglou, Orestis, “Empedocles’ epistemology and embodied cognition,” Ancient Philosophy Today, 5, 1, 2023, p. 1-28.
[B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 105, B 106, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 129, B 133, B 134, B 146.]
Karfík, Filip, Die Beseelung des Kosmos: Untersuchungen zur Kosmologie, Seelenlehre und Theologie in Platons Phaidon und Timaios, Munich-Leipzig: K.G. Saur 2004, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 199).
[B 38.]
– “L’âme du monde : Platon, Anaxagore, Empédocle,” Études platoniciennes, 11, 2014, p. 1-23.
http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/572
[B 134.]
Karsten, Simon, Empedoclis Agrigentini carminum reliquiae, de vita ejus et studiis disseruit, fragmenta explicuit, philosophiam illustravit, Amsterdam: J. Müller1838.
[[+ +].]
Katsch, Julius Ferdinand, Medizinische Quellenstudien. Entwickelungsgang des Aehnlichkeitsaximos von Empedokles bis auf Hahnermann, Stuttgart: Metzler 1891.
[The position of Emp. in the history of the medicine.]
Kaufmann, David, “Pseudo-Empedokles als Quelle Salomon Ibn Gabirols,” in: D. Kaufman, Studien über Salomon Ibn Gabirol, Budapest 1899, p. 1-63.
Kayachev, Boris, Allusion and allegory: studies in the Ciris, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2016, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 346).
[B 3, B 27, B 112, B 115, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 137.]
Keaney J. J. & R. Lamberton (ed.), [Plutarch], Essay on the life and poetry of Homer, Atlanta (Georgia): Scholar Press 1996, (American Classical Studies, 40).
Kearns, Emily, Ancient Greek religion: a sourcebook, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2010, (Blackwell sourcebooks in ancient history, 13).
[Inwood, p. 133-135, B 112, B 115, B 137.]
– “'Remembering the ancient way of life': Primitivism in Greek sacrificial ritual,” in: Greek notions of the past in the archaic and classical eras: History without historians, ed. J. Marincola, L. Llewellyn-Jones & C. Maciver, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2012, (Edinburgh Leventis Studies, 6), p. 301-316.
[Emp.: p. 308-310, B 128.]
Keil, H., “Ioannis Tzetzae scholiorum in Aristophanem prolegomena,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 6, 1848, p. 108-134.
[Tzetzes. In Mus. Rhen., B 122 p. 115. See also G. Kaibel, Com. 1899.]
Keizer, Heleen (Helena), Maria, Life time entirety: a study of AIΩN in Greek literature and philosophy, the Septuagint and Philo, Academisch Proefschrift (This e-publication contains minor corrections to the 1999 dissertation), 2010.
[Emp. p. 59-62. B 16, B 17, B 26.]
Keith, Arthur Berriedale, “Pythagoras and the doctrine of transmigration,” Journal of the royal asiatic society, 1909, p. 569-606.
Kelesidou, Anna (Άννα Κελεσίδου)., Εμπεδοκλης ο Ακραγαντίνος:·Έμμετρη νεοελληνική απόδοση των αποσπασμάτων, Αθήνα 2002.
Kelly, Paul Joseph, “Empedocles and Teilhard,” The Teilhard Review, 6/2, 1971-1972, p. 76-83.
Kelly, Peter, “Compounding Compound Creatures. The Catalogue of Hybrids in Tristia, 4.7 and Empedocles,” Mnemosyne, 71, 4, 2018, p. 667-687.
[A 72, B 60, B 61.]
Kenny, Anthony (Sir), A new history of Western philosophy, Volume I. Ancient philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2004.
[Emp.: p. 20-24, 231. A 72, B 6, B 17, B 35, B 21, B 57, B 115, B 117, B 137, B 141, B 146. 4 elements, H2O, following D. Furley. Metempsychosis.]
– “Life after Etna: The legend of Empedocles in literary tradition,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 17-30.
– From Empedocles to Wittgenstein: historical essays in philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press 2008.
[Reprint p. 14-28 of “Life after Etna: Empedocles in prose and poetry”.]
Kerényi, Károly, “Pythagoras und Orpheus,” in: Aufsätze zur Geschichte der Antike und des Christentums, ed. F. Altheim, K. Kerenyi, H. Russel, W. Iwanow, P. Vignaux, K. Schmid, Berlin, p. 16-49.
[= K. Kerényi, Humanistische Seelenforschung, Münich 1966, Wiesbaden 1978, Stuttgart 1996, (Emp.: p.14-41). See also: K. Kerényi, Pythagoras und Orpheus, Amsterdam 1940. And K. Kerényi, Pythagoras und Orpheus: Präludien zu einer zukünftigen Geschichte der Orphik und des Pythagoreismus, Dritte, erweiterte Ausgabe, Zürich: Rhein Verlag 1950, (Albae Vigiliae).]
Kerferd, George Briscoe, (1962) “Review of Harald A. T. Reiche: Empedocles’ mixture, Eudoxan astronomy and Aristotle’s connate pneuma,” The Classical Review, 12, 1, 1962, p. 93-94.
– (1967) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. I, 1965, A new approach to Empedocles,” The Classical Review, 17, 2, 1967, p. 147-149.
– (1971) “Review of D. O’Brien: Empedocles’ cosmic cycle,” The Classical Review, 21, 2, 1971, p. 176-178.
– (1972) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. II Les Origines and III Commentaire i-ii,” The Classical Review, 22, 3, 1972, p. 325-327.
– (1978) “Review of N. van der Ben, The Proem of Empedocles’ Peri Physios,” The Classical Review, 28, 1, 1978, p. 167-168.
– (1985) “Gorgias and Empedocles,” Siculorum gymnasium, 38, 1985, p. 595-605. [Gorgia e la sofistica: Atti del convegno internazionale (Lentini-Catania, 12–15 dic. 1983), eds. L. Montoneri and F. Romano. Catania].
Kerimov, Khafiz, “Καθάπερ ἄνθρωπος φρόνιμος: Prudence in Aristotle’s ethics and biology,” Apeiron, 54, 4, 2021, p. 519-543.
[B 57, B 61.]
Kerkhoff, Manfred, “Empédocle et Zarathoustra. Sept versions de la mort libre,” Les Études philosophiques, 4, 1992, p. 539-554.
Kern, Otto, De Orphei Epimenidis Pherecydis theogoniis quaestiones criticae, diss., Berlin 1888, p. 11-12.
[A 501.]
– “Empedokles und die Orphiker,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 1, 1888, p. 498-508. [Published also separately as a Sonderabdruck aus AGPh.]
Kerschensteiner, Jula, Kosmos. Quellenkritische Untersuchungen zu den Vorsokratikern, Munich: C. H. Beck 1962.
[P. 124-140. B 26, B 27, B 28, B 134, B 135, A 32, A 58 etc.]
Kertsch, Manfred, “Philologische Notizen zu Gregor von Nazianz,” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik, 29, 1980, p. 1-7.
[A 165.]
Ketterer, David, “Empedocles in Eureka - Addenda,” Poe Studies Dark Romanticism,18, 2, 1985.
Keuls, Eva C., The water carriers in Hades: A study of catharsis through toil in classical Antiquity, Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert 1974.
[P. 22 et passim.]
Kidd, Douglas, Alexander, Aratus. Phaenomena, edited with introduction, translation and commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997, (Cambridge classical texts and commentaries, 34).
Kidd, Ian, “Some philosophical demons,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 40, 1995, p. 217-224.
[B 115.]
Kingsley, Peter, Michael, (1979) On the teaching of Empedocles, diss., Cambridge University 1979.
– (1990) “The Greek origin of the sixth-century dating of Zoroaster,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 53, 1990, p. 245-265.
– (1993) “Empedocles in Armenian,” Revue des études arméniennes, 24, 1993, p. 47-57.
[A 491].
– (1994) “Empedocles and his interpreters: The four-element Doxography,” Phronesis, 39, 1994, p. 235-254.
– (1994) “Empedocles’ sun,” The Classical Quarterly, 44, 1994, p. 316-324.
[A 561, A 30, B 44.]
– (1994) “From Pythagoras to the Turba philosophorum: Egypt and Pythagorean tradition,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 57, 1994, p. 1-13.
– (1994) “Greeks, Shamans and Magi,” Studia Iranica, 23, 1994, p. 187-198.
[B 111.]
– (1995) “Notes on air: four questions of meaning in Empedocles and Anaxagoras,” Th Classical Quarterly, 45, 1995, p. 26-29.
[B 38.3-4, B 78, A 49.]
– (1995) “Artillery and Prophecy: Sicily in the reign of Dionysus I,” Prometheus, 21, 1995, p. 15-23.
– (1995) “Meetings with Magi: Iranian Themes among the Greeks, from Xanthus of Lydia to Plato’s Academy,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 5, 1995, p. 173-209.
– (1995) Ancient philosophy, mystery, and magic. Empedocles and Pythagorean tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995. (Reprints: 19972, 20013).
[Translations: Empédocle et la tradition pythagoricienne, Les Belles Lettres, 2010; Archaia philosophia mystêria kai mageia, Archetypo Publishing, 2001; Antik Felsefe, Gizem ve Büyü, Kabalci Yayinevi, 2002; Misteri e magia nella filosofia antica, Il Saggiatore and Mondolibri, 2007; Filosofía antigua, misterios y magia, Ediciones Atalanta, 2008.]
– (1996) “Empedocles’ two poems,” Hermes, 124, 1996, p. 108-111.
– (1999) In the dark places of wisdom, Inverness (Ca.): Golden Sufi Center 1999. (London: Duckworth 2001).
[B 146: p. 231-232. French translation by H.D. Saffrey: Dans les antres de la sagesse : études parménidiennes, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2007, (Vérité des mythes, Sources). In this translation: Emp. p. 185.]
– (2001) Αρχαία φιλοσοφία, μυστήρια και μαγεία : ο Εμπεδοκλής και η πυθαγόρεια παράδοση, μτφρ. Φ. Τερζάκης, Θεσσαλονίκη: Αρχέτυπο, 2001.
– (2002) Antik Felsefe Gizem ve Büyü Pythagoras ve Empedokles Geleneği,Istanbul: Kabalcı 2002.
– (2002) “Empedocles for the new millennium,” Ancient Philosophy, 22, 2, 2002, p. 333-413.
[Published in Greek as a book by Archetypo 2008.]
– (2003) “Sowers of eternity,” in: P. Kingsley, Reality, Inverness (Ca.): The Golden Sufi Center 2003, p. 309-559 (text) and 586-91 (notices).
[German version as Reality by Crotona Verlag. 2012. Greek version, as Archaiohellenikê skepsê kai dytikos politismos, by Dioptra Publishing. Slovenian version as Resnicnost, by Kud Logos.
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/peter-kingsley
– (2007) Misteri e magia nella filosofia antica: Empedocle e la tradizione pitagorica, Milan: Il Saggiatore 2007, (La Cultura).
– (2008) Filosofía antigua, misterios y magia: Empedocles y la tradicion pitagorica, Girona: Atalanta 2008.
– (2008) Ο ΕΜΠΕΔΟΚΛΗΣ ΣΤΟΝ 21ο ΑΙΩΝΑ, translation Ζάρρας Κωνσταντίνος, Thessaloniki: Αρχέτυπο 2008.
– (2010) Empédocle et la tradition pythagoricienne : Philosophie ancienne, mystère et magie, translation by G. Lacaze of Ancient philosophy, mystery, and magic, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2010, (coll. Vérité des mythes, 34).
– (2018) Catafalque: Carl Jung and the end of humanity, 1 & 2, London: Catafalque Press 2018.
[A lot of bibliographical references in vol. 2, in the notes, p. 403-800.]
Kingsley, Katie Scarlett, Herodotus’ historical inquiry and Presocratic Philosophy, Diss. Ph.D., Princeton 2016.
[B 2, B 3, B 8, B 9, B 110, B 135.]
– Herodotus and the Presocratics: inquiry and intellectual culture in the fifth century BCE, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2024.
Kingsley, Katie Scarlett & Parry, Richard, “Empedocles,” in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition, Apr 7, 2020 revised, substantive revision Wed Sep 25, 2024), ed. Edward N. Zalta.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/empedocles/
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/empedocles/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/empedocles/
Kirk, Geoffrey, S. & Raven, John, E., The Presocratic philosophers: a critical history with a selection of texts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1957. Several reprints with corrections: 1960, 1962, 1963, then reprints of the last print of 1963 up to 1979.
[Emp.: p. 320-361. [+ +].]
Kirk, Geoffrey, S., Raven, John, E. & Schofield, Malcolm, The Presocratic philosophers: a critical history with a selection of texts, second edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983². Several reprints: 1984, 1985, 1987, 1988, 1990.
[A title often signaled as KRS. The second edition is ruled by M. Schofield, this is important for Empedocles. P. 280-321, chapter X. [+ +].]
– Les philosophes présocratiques : une histoire critique avec un choix de textes, traduit de l’anglais par H.-A. de Weck sous la direction de D. J. O’Meara, Fribourg (Switzerland): Éditions Universitaires 1995, and Paris: Éditions du Cerf 1995, (Vestigia, 16, Pensée antique et médiévale).
[P. 301-345, chapter X. [+ +].]
Kirk, Geoffrey S., Heraclitus, The cosmic fragments, Cambridge University Press 19784.
Kirsch-Klingelhöffer, Charlotte, “Doxography and eschatology in Clement of Alexandria,” Vigiliae Christianae, 2024, 78, 2, p185-209.
Kissel, Myriam, “Les Purifications d’Empédocle : ascèse et responsabilité,” in: Travaux et Documents, Journée de l’Antiquité 2005-2006 (tome 1), ed. M. Kissel, Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de l’Université de la Réunion, 2007, p. 109-133.
[B 112, B 115, B 124, B 128, B 131, B 134, B 136, B 137, B 139.]
– “Empédocle mis en scène,” in: Le dépassement des limites. Au-delà de l’humain : nouvelles recherches sur l’imaginaire, XLIII, ed. L. Gourmelen, Angers: Presses universitaires de Rennes 2021, p. 307-320.
Kittler Friedrich, A., “Das Alphabet der Griechen. Zur Archäologie der Schrift,” in: Die Aktualität des Archäologischen in Wissenschaften, Medien und Kunsten, ed. Knut Ebeling & Stefan Altekamp, Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer 2004, p. 252-260.
[Translation into English: “The Alphabet of the Greeks: On the Archeology of Writing,” in: The truth of the technological world: essays on the genealogy of presence, Stanford: Stanford University Press 2013.]
[P. 267-274. P. 273: B 6.]
Kleczkowska, Katarzyna, “Reincarnation in Empedocles of Akragas,” Maska, 36, 4, 2017, p. 183-198. On-line:
http://www.maska.psc.uj.edu.pl/documents/40768330/43096068/Maska_36.pdf/
[B115, B117, B127, B146.]
– “Animals and vegetarian diet in Empedocles of Akragas,” Maska, 36, 4, 2017, p. 199-211. On-line:
http://www.maska.psc.uj.edu.pl/documents/40768330/43096068/Maska_36.pdf/
Knatz, Fridericus, “Empedoclea,” in: Schedae philologae Hermanno Usener a sodalibus Seminarii Regii Bonnensis oblatae, Bonn: F. Cohen 1891, p. 1-9.
[B 6, B 38.4, B 115.3-5, B 24, B 17.25, B 121.2.]
Kočandrle, Radim, “Origins of the spherical earth in ancient Greek cosmology,” Ancient Philosophy, 43, 2, 2023, p. 315-335.
Koetschau, Paul (ed.), Origenes Werke, 2, Buch V–VIII, Gegen Celsus, Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs1899, (Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten Jahrhunderte, 3).
Kofman, Sarah, “Freud et Empédocle,” Critique, 265, 1969, p. 525-550.
Kohlschitter, Silke Angelika, “Parmenides and Empedocles in Porphyry’s History of philosophy,” Hermathena, 150, 1991, p. 43-53.
[B 1172.]
– The interpretation of Empedocles in the tradition of middle- and Neoplatonism, diss., Dublin 1991.
Kojève, Alexandre, Essai d’une histoire raisonnée de la philosophie païenne - Tome 1 Les Présocratiques, Paris: Gallimard 1968.
[Emp.: p. 286-294. Between Heraclitus and Parmenides, closer to Heraclitus. The Muse as a literary mask or a parody. Empedocles as a charlatan. B 2, B 3, B 4, B 5, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 14, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 24, B 25, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 53, B 96, B 98, B 115.]
Kołakowska, Katarzyna, (2011) “Orficki charakter poematu Empedoklesa,” in: Orfizm w jego recepcja w literaturze, sztuce w filozofii, ed. K. Kołakowska, Kraków-Lublin 2011, p. 39-50.
– (2012) Mit u Empedoklesa, Kraków: Scriptum 2012.
– (2015) “Empedokles nieznany: Carmen de septem planetis (Par. Graec. 3047),” Littera Antiqua, 10, 2015, p. 294-307.
– (2016) “Dwa papirusy religijne: PDerv. w PHerc. 1428 fr. 14: porównanie,” Littera Antiqua, 11, 2016, p. 22-36.
http://www.litant.eu/artykuly/nr11/LA%2011%20(2016).pdf
[B7, B9, B 17, B 21, B 137.]
– (2017) “Empedocles of Akragas: Politician and Performer,” in: Politics and Performance in Western Greece, Essays on the Hellenic Heritage of Sicily and Southern Italy, ed. Heather L. Reid, Davide Tanasi & Susi Kimbell, Sioux city (Iowa): Parnassos Press -Fonte Aretusa 2017, p. 205-215.
[B 1, B 17, B 112, B 114, B 145.]
Koning, Hugo H., Hesiod: the other poet. Ancient reception of a cultural icon, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2010, (Mnemosyne supplements. Monographs on Greek and Roman language and literature; 325).
[P. 166-170: B 115; p. 195: B 6; p. 210-217: Revelation modified (Parmenides and Empedocles), B 3, B 131.]
Korab-Karpowicz, Włodzimierz, Julian, “The wisdom of love: A reflection upon Empedocles’ fragment 35,” Dialectics and Humanism, 17, 3, 1990, p. 211-216.
[B 35.]
– The Presocratics in the thought of Martin Heidegger, Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften 2016.
Körner, U., “Entstehung des Lebens: Moderne Auffassungen und naturwissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse in Bezug auf Ansichten des Empedokles,” Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 20/2, 1971, p. 225-229.
Koster, Willem, Johann, Wolff, Scholia in Aristophanem. Pars I : Prolegomena de Comoedia. Scholia in Acharnenses, Equites, Nubes, Fasc. I A continens Prolegomena de Comedia, Groningen: Bouma’s Boekhuis 1975.
[Tzetzes, Ioannis Tzetzae. Prolegomena de comoedia Aristophanis. B 122.]
Kotwick, Mirjam, E., Alexander of Aphrodisias and the text of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Berkeley: California Classical Studies 2016. (California Classical Studies, 4).
– “Aphrodite’s cosmic Power: Empedocles in the Derveni Papyrus,” in: Presocratics and papyrological tradition. A philosophical reappraisal of the sources, Proceedings of the International Workshop held at the University of Trier (22–24 September 2016), ed. Ch. Vassallo, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2019, (Studia Praesocratica, 10), p. 252-269.
[B 6, B 22, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 96, B 112, B 115.]
Κουλουμέντας, Σταύρος, (Kouloumentas, Stavros), “Της Αγάπης αίματα: αναζητώντας την ενότητα του εμπεδόκλειου έργου,” Φιλοσοφία, 52, 2022, p. 335-358.
[This article was published in 2024. B 6, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 26, B 35, B 62, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 107, B 110, B 115, B 117, Β 118, Β 126, B 127, B 128, B 146. δαίμων.]
Kouremenos Theokritos et al., The Derveni Papyrus, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki 2006, (Studi e testi per il corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, 13).
[B 134.]
Kovalchuk, K. (Xenia) C. & Afonasina, A. C. (Ковальчук К. С & Афонасина А. С.), ‘Ριζωματα - четыре основания вселенной,’ Respublica Literaria, 3, 2, 2022, p. 5-18.
[A 30, A 85, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 35, B 45, B 48, B 55, B 56, B 62, B 67, B 73, B 76, B 81, B 85, B 96, B 109, B 112, B 115.]
Krafft, Fritz, “Anaxagoras und Empedokles,” in: Die Grossen der Weltgeschichte I, Zürich 1971, I.466-482.
Kranz, Walther, (1912) “Empedokles und die Atomistik,” Hermes, 47.1, 1912, p. 18-42.
– (1912) “Die ältesten Farbenlehren der Griechen,” Hermes, 47, 1, 1912, p. 126-140.
[A 41, B 21, B 23, B 29.1 (Flügel 'sieht' er als Zweige), B 67, B 71, B 128.]
– (1935) “Vorsokratisches III. Die Katharmoi und die Physika des Empedokles,” Hermes, 70, 1, 1935, p. 111-119.
[= W. K, Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken: Kleine Schriften, ed. von E. Vogt, Heidelberg: Winter 1967, p. 105-114. B2, B 3, B 6, B 77-78, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 124, B 127, B 129, B 130, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 140, B 143, B 146.]
– (1938) “Gleichnis und Vergleich in der frühgriechischen Philosophie,” Hermes,73, 1, 1938, p. 99-122.
– (1938) “Kosmos und Mensch in der Vorstellung frühen Griechentums,” in: Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philol. - Hist. Klasse, 1938, p. 121-161.
[B 45. Reprint in Kranz W., herausgegeben von Ernst Vogt, Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihrem Fortwirken, Kleine Schriften, Heidelberg: Carl Winter 1967, p. 165-196.]
– (1938) “Kosmos als philosophischer Begriff frühgriechischer Zeit,” Philologus, 93, 1938, p. 430-448.
[Emp.: p. 443-444, B 134.4, A 50, B 31.]
– (1941) Die griechische Philosophie: zugleich eine Einführung in die Philosophie überhaupt, Leipzig: Dieterich 1941, (Sammlung Dieterich, 88).
[Several Reprints. Stuttgart: Stuttgarter Hausbücherei 1955, Birsfelden-Basel: Schibli-Doppler 1955, Emp. p. 68-78. Bremen: Schünemann 1962.]
– (1944) “Lukrez und Empedokles,” Philologus, 96, 1-2, 1944, p. 68-107.
– (1949) Empedokles, Antike Gestalt und romantische Neuschöpfung, Zürich: Artemis 1949.
[[+ +].]
– (1949) Vorsokratische Denker: Auswahl aus dem Überlieferten - Griechisch und Deutsch, Berlin-Frankfurt: Weidmann, 1949.
[Empedocles: p. 121-153.]
– (1957) “Zwei kosmologische Fragen,” Rheinisches Museum für Philosophie, 100, 1957, p. 114-129.
– (1961) “Die Sonne als Titan,” Philologus, 105, 1961, p. 290-295.
[B 38.]
Kranzelbinder, Daniel, Christoph, “Aristotle on what is ‘beyond us’ (ὑπὲρ ἡμᾶς),” Ancient Philosophy, 44, 2024, p. 469-485.
[Sterility in mules. Wine and water. Copper and tin. B 92.]
Krell, David Farrell, Postponements: woman, sensuality and death in Nietzsche, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1986, (Studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy).
– “Nietzsche Hölderlin Empedocles,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 15/2, 1991, p. 31-48.
– “Δίπλ’ ἐρέω, "A double tale I shall tell . . . ": Empedocles and Hölderlin on tragic nature and tragic purification,” Epoché, 11, 2, 2007, p. 287-304.
– “Hölderlin’s Death of Empedocles: a new translation,” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2008, 12, 2, p. 289-311.
– Friedrich Hölderlin. The death of Empedocles: a mourning play, translated with introduction, notes, and analysis by D. F. K., Albany: State University of New York Press 2008.
– The Sea: a philosophical encounter, London-New York-Oxford-New Delhi-Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic 2018.
[Emp.: p. 160-177; A 72, B 6, B 17, B 31, B 55, B 57, B 61, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 128, Nietzsche, Freud, Heidegger.]
Krische, August Bernhard, Die theologischen Lehren der griechischen Denker, eine Prüfung der Darstellung Cicero’s (= Forschungen auf dem Gebiete der alten Philosophie,1), Göttingen: Dieterich 1840.
[P. 116-129. B 6.]
Kroll, Guilelmus, Syriani in Metaphysica Commentaria, Berlin: G. Reimer 1902, (Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, 6, 1).
Krüger, J. S., “Die plek van Empedokles in die metafisies-mistieke tradisie,” Ηervormde teologiese studies, 63, 2, 2007, p. 409-430.
http://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/article/view/223/157
Külcü, Recep, “Pioneers of scientific thought: Empedocles and Anaxagoras,” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7, 9, 2023, p. 1252-1257.
Kulig, Katarzyna [then Kołakowska], “Dlatego ogarnięci wielką nikczemnoscią, nigdy nie uwolnicie serca od smutnego cierpienia” - Empedoklejski grzech,” Roczniky humanistyczne, 52/3, 2004, p. 97-108.
[“And this is why, seized with great wickedness, you’ll never rid your heart of sad suffering” - Empedoclean Sin. B 112, B 3.1-8, B 131, B 128, B 137, B 139, B 141, B 115, B 126; an unoriginal and rather superficial sketch of daimon’s cycle.]
https://kul.academia.edu/KatarzynaKo%C5%82akowska
Kupreeva, Inna, (Trans.), Philoponus: On Aristotle, On Coming-to-be and Perishing 2.5-11, translated by I. K., London: Gerald Duckworth 2005. And London-New York: Bloomsbury 2014, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle).
[Refutation of Empedocles: p. 49-60. Plus notes.]
Kurfess, Christopher John, Restoring Parmenides’ poem: essays toward a new arrangement of the fragments based on a reassessment of the original sources, Diss., University of Pittsburgh, 2012.
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/16704/1/KurfessCJ_ETD2012.pdf
[B2, B3.]
Kyriakou, Poulheria, “Empedoclean Echoes in Apollonius Rhodius’ ‘Argonautica’,” Hermes, 122, 1994, p. 309-319.
[B 272.3, B 62, B 124.]
– “Narrator and poetic divinities in Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica,” Trends in Classics, 10, 2, 2018, p. 367-391.
[B 3, B 131.]
Lacaze, Grégoire, Turba philosophorum : Congrès pythagoricien sur l’art d’Hermès. Édition critique, traduction et présentation, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2018, (Philosophia Antiqua, 150).
[Pandulfus-Empédocle, p. 236-253. Influenced by P. Kingsley. A 35, A 49b, A 50, B 6, B 52.]
Lachenaud, Guy, “Review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, Paris 1981,” Revue des études grecques, 96, 455-459, 1983, p. 307-308.
– Plutarque. Œuvres morales, XII², Opinions des philosophes, texte établi et traduit par G. L., Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1993, (Collection des Universités de France).
[Aetius. A 33, A 35, A 43, A 44, A 45, A 47, A 49, A 50, A 51, A 53, A 54, A 56, A 58, A 60, A 61, A 65, A 66, A 70, A 72, A 74, A 75, A 77, A 78, A 81, A 82, A 83, A 85, A 88, A 90, A 92, A 93, A 94, A 95, A 97, B 6, B 8, B 13.]
Lackenbacher, Hans, “Beiträge zur antiken Optik,” Wiener Studien, 35, 1913, p. 34-61.
[Emp.: p. 39-45; B 84.]
La Croce, Ernesto, “Empedocles’ Sphairos and Parmenidean legacy,” Platon, 32-3, 1980-1, p. 114-122.
– “Empédocles de Agrigento,” in: Los filósofos presocráticos, II, Madrid: Gredos 1979, (Biblioteca Clásica Gredos, 24).
[Reimpr. 1985. P. 127-294. Most testimonies and fragments from DK, new order with a concordance table p. 417-420; many footnotes. [+ +].]
La Croce, Ernesto & Eggers Lan, Conrado, Los filósofos presocráticos: Empédocles de Agrigento, Anaxágoras de Clazómenas - Introducciones, traducciones y notas, Barcelona: Planeta DeAgostini 1996, (Los Clásicos de Grecia y Roma, 73).
[First edition in Madrid: Gredos 1979.]
Lagercrantz, Otto, Elementum: Eine lexikologische Studie, Uppsala-Leipzig: Almqvist & Wiksell 1911.
Lagrange, M-J., Introduction à l’étude du nouveau testament, 4e partie, Critique historique, I, Les mystères : l’orphisme, Paris : Gabalda et Compagnie 1937.
[Emp. : p. 156-165.]
Lahman-Kuzmić, N., “Suvremenost jedne Empedoklove misli,” Forum, 1-2, 1981, p. 302-327.
[The contemporality of Empedocles’ mind.]
Laín Entralgo, Pedro, The therapy of the word in Classical Antiquity, Edited and translated by L. J. Rather and J. M. Sharp, New Haven-London: Yale University Press 1970. First published in Spanish: La curación por la palabra en la antigüedad clásica, Madrid 1958.
[Emp.: p. 43-44, 82-87.]
Laird Andrew (ed.), Ancient literary criticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006, (Oxford Readings in Classical Studies).
Laks, André, (1978) “À propos d’un livre de N. van der Ben : The Proem of Empedocles Peri Physios,” Revue de Philologie, 52, 1978, p. 343-347.
– (1999) “À propos du nouvel Empédocle : les vers 267-290 du poème physique étayent-ils l’hypothèse d’une double zoogonie ?” Hyperboreus, 5, 1, 1999, (Bibliotheca classica petropolitana), p. 15-21.
http://www.bibliotheca-classica.org/sites/default/files/laks.pdf
– (1999) “Soul, sensation and thought,” in: The Cambridge Companion to early Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 250-270.
[B 3, B 100, B 105, B 106, B 108, B 109, B 134, B 138. Reprint Ψυχή, Αίσθηση και Σκέψη in: Οι Προσωκρατικοί Φιλόσοφοι, Συναγωγή Συστατικών Μελετημάτων Θ. Νικολαίδης- Τ. Τυφλόπουλος (μτφρ.], Δ.Ιακώβ (επιμ.), Αθήνα: Παπαδήμα 2005, p. 361-388.]
– (2001) “À propos de l’édition de l’Empédocle de Strasbourg,” Méthexis, 14, 2001, p. 117-125.
– (2002) “Reading the readings: On the first person plurals in the Strasburg Empedocles,” in: Presocratic philosophy, Essays in honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. V. Caston & D. W. Graham, Aldershot: Ashgate 2002, p. 127-137.
– (2003) “Phénomènes et références : éléments pour une réflexion sur la rationalisation de l’irrationnel,” Methodos, 3 (Figures de l’irrationnel), 2003, p. 9-33 (paper).
http://methodos.revues.org/205
[P. 1-21 on-line. B 111, B 112.]
– (2004) Le vide et la haine : éléments pour une histoire archaïque de la négativité, Paris: PUF 2004, (Collection Libelles).
[Emp.: p. 26-49. B 17, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 147.]
– (2003) “Some thoughts about Empedoclean cosmic and demonic cycles,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 265-282.
[Necessity, B 115, B 128, B 146, B 147, comparison with Plato’s Phaedrus: C 1.]
– (2009) El vacío y el odio: Elementos para una historia arcaica de la negatividad, trad. Leopoldo Iribarren, Madrid: Arena Libro 2009 (later 2010).
[Cf. Le Vide et la haine.]
– (2010) “Hystéron protéron ? Des Origines aux Purifications,” in: La Philologie au présent. Pour Jean Bollack, ed. C. König & D. Thouard, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 2010, (Cahiers de philologie, 27), p. 19-26.
– (2013) “Phenomenon and reference: revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the problem of rationalization,” in: Modernity’s Classics, ed. S.C. Humphreys & R.G. Wagner, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer 2013, p. 165-186.
[Emp.: p. 177-183; B 111.]
– (2013) “Sur quelques modalités de la raison pratique dans les cosmo-ontologies présocratiques,” in: Nature and the best life. Exploring the natural bases of practical normativity in ancient philosophy, ed. G. Rossi, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York: G. Olms 2013, p. 15-41.
[Empedocles: p. 30-38.]
– (2015) “Sommeils présocratiques,” in: Le Sommeil : Approches philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance, ed. V. Leroux, N. Palmieri, C. Pigné, Paris: Honoré Champion 2015, (Sciences, techniques et civilisations du Moyen Âge à l’aube des Lumières, 16), p. 29-50.
[A 85.]
– (2016) “Review of Hellmut Flashar, Dieter Bremer, Georg Rechenauer (Hrsgg.): Frühgriechische Philosophie. 2 Halbbde. Basel: Schwabe 2013. LIX, 1061 S. (Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Begründet von Heinrich Ueberweg. Völlig neu bearbeitete Ausgabe ed. von Helmut Holzhey. Die Philosophie der Antike. 1.),” Gnomon, 2016, p. 481-485.
[Primavesi: p. 485.]
– (2018) The concept of presocratic philosophy: its origin, development, and significance. Translated by Glenn W. Most, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2018. Title of the original edition in 2006 (Paris, PUF): Introduction à la “philosophie présocratique”.
– (2021) “Soul and cosmos before Plato. Five short doxographical studies,” in: Cosmology and biology in ancient philosophy: from Thales to Avicenna, ed. R. Salles, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021, p. 8-28.
[B 136.]
Laks, André & Claire Millot. “Réexamen de quelques fragments de Diogène d’Œnoanda sur l’âme, la connaissance et la fortune (NF 7, NF 19, NF 2-34 Ch., NF 20, 7 Ch., NF 1, NF 5-6, NF 13-12, 12 Ch.),” Cahier de Philologie, 1, Études sur l’épicurisme antique, 1976, p. 319-357.
[42 Smith, R34 LM.]
Laks, André & Most, Glenn Warren, Early Greek philosophy, V, Western Greek Thinkers, Part 2, edited and translated by A. Laks and G. W. Most, in collaboration with Gérard Journée and assisted by Leopoldo Iribarren, Cambridge (Ma.)-London: Harvard University Press 2016, (Loeb Classical Library, 528).
[22. Empedocles = EMP.: p. 317-733. [+ +].]
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/empedocles---concordances-laks-most-diels-kranz-plus
Laks, André & Most, Glenn Warren., Les débuts de la philosophie. Des premiers penseurs grecs à Socrate, Édition et traduction A. Laks et G. W. Most, avec la collaboration de Gérard Journée et le concours de Leopoldo Iribarren et David Lévystone, Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard 2016, (Ouvertures bilingues).
[22. Empédocle = EMP.: p. 659-819. [+ +].]
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/empedocles---concordances-laks-most-diels-kranz-plus
Lamberton, Robert, Homer. The Theologian: Neoplatonist allegorical reading and the growth of epic tradition, 1986 (paperpack: 1989).
[English translation of Stobaeus, Porphyry B 126.]
Lambridis, Helle, Empedocles: A philosophical investigation. With a Pref. Essay ‘Empedocles and T. S. Eliots” by Marshall McLuhan, Alabama: University of Alabama Press 1976.
[[+ +].]
Lambropoulou, Voula (Λαμπροπούλου, Βούλα), “The concept of harmony in Greek thought from Homer to Aristotle: cosmology,” Platon, 50, 1, 1998, p. 145-168.
[On cosmology of Heraclitus and Emp.]
Lami, Alessandro, I Presocratici. Testimonianze e frammenti da Talete a Empedocle, Milan: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli 1991, (1995²), (I Classici della BUR).
[[+ +].]
Laminne, Jacques, “Les quatre éléments : le feu, l’air, l’eau, la terre. Histoire d’une hypothèse,” in: Mémoires couronnés et autres mémoires publiés par l’Académie royale […] de Belgique, LXV, 2, Brussels: Hayez 1904, p. 5-194.
[B 6.]
Lampis, Giuseppe, “Empedocle. Una metafisica della colpa,” Atopon, Quaderno 2, 2006, p. 5-59, (Roma, Edizioni Mythos). Edizione elettronica riveduta e corretta 2014, p. 3-109.
[A 37, A 50, A 67, A 75, B 11, B 17, B 35, B 67, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 126, B 134, B 137, B 139, B 142, B 146.]
Lamprellis, Dimitris N. (Λαμπρέλλης, Δημήτρης N.), Ο Εμπεδοκλής και τα πέρατα του λόγου, Athens: Παπαζησης 2019, (Φιλοσοφική Βιβλιοθήκη / Μελέτες, 51).
Lanata, Giuliana, “19. Empedocles,” in: Poetica pre-platonica; testimonianze e frammenti, testo, traduzione e commento, Firenze: La Nuova Italia 1963, p. 128-135.
[B 3, B 17, B 112, B 24, B 35, B 23.]
Lapini, Walter, (2003) “La morte di Empedocle (Emped. A 1 DK),” in: W. Lapini, Studi di filologia filosofica greca, Firenze: Olschki 2003, p. 91-114.
– (2003) “Empedocle e la melanconia,” Anthropos & Iatria, 7.1, 2003, p. 48-54.
– (2005) “Empedocle B 16, 2 D.-K.,” Elenchos, 2005, 26, 1, p. 111-118.
[B 16.]
– (2013) “Empedocle e il tempo inestinguibile (B 16 DK),” in: W. Lapini, Testi frammentari e critica del testo, Problemi di filologia filosofica greca, Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 2013, p. 87-102.
[New version, modified and extended, of “Empedocle B 16.2 DK,” Elenchos 26, 2005. B 16.]
– (2013) “Empedocle e la lanterna (B 84.3 DK),” in: W. Lapini, Testi frammentari e critica del testo, Problemi di filologia filosofica greca, Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura 2013, p. 103-115.
[B 84.]
Larsen, Peter D. (ed.) & Vasilis Politis (ed.), The Platonic Mind, Routledge 2024, (Routledge Philosophical Minds).
[Water and H2O.]
Lasserre, François, “Trois nouvelles citations poétiques,” Museum Helveticum, 26, 1969, p. 80-83.
[Chap. 1: Deux vers inédits d’Empédocle = B 152 Wright = B 153b Vítek.]
Last, Hugh, “Empedokles and His Klepsydra Again,” The Classical Quarterly, 18, 1924, p. 169-73.
[B 100.]
Laurenti, Renato, (1993) “Bellezza e piacere nell’opera di Empedocle,” Studi filosofici, 16, 1993, p. 7-26.
– (1994) “La componente aritmo-geometrica nella teologia di Empedocle,” in: Il dibattito su Parmenide. Aspetti della filosofia tra V e IV secolo, Atti del convegno, Macerata-Perugia, 24-26 marzo 1994, [Never published?].
– (1995) “Le Proème à Apollon d’Empédocle dans les fragments d’Aristote,” in: L’Aristote perdu, Atti del Convegno organizzato dal Collegium Academicum Universale philosophiae (Atene) - Centro Internazionale di Filosofia Greca “Antonio Jannone” (Atene-Roma), ed. A. Jannone et alii, Roma: Atene, 1995, p. 103-119.
[B 134, B 142.]
–(1999) Empedocle, Naples: M. D’Auria editore 1999.
[[+ +].]
– (2007) “Bellezza e piacere nell’opera di Empedocle,” in: R. Laurenti. Scritti vari da Omero ad Arnobio, ed. P. Cosenza, Napoli: Liguori 2007. (Quaderni del Dipartimento di filosofia e politica, Università degli studi di Napoli L’Orientale, 32), p. 3-25.
[Reprint of Studi filosofici, 16, 1993, p. 7-26]
Lazzeri, Massimo, “Un verso di Empedocle frg. 10 Diels,” Bollettino dei classici, 3a ser. I, 1980, p. 25-28.
[B 10.]
Leâo, Eryc de Oliveira, Empédocles entre Mýthos e Lógos – Um estudo sobre a relação entre os poemas de Empédocles depois do papiro de Estrasburgo, Diss. (Mestrado em Filosofia) Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2013.
https://repositorio.unb.br/bitstream/10482/13743/1/2013_ErycDeOliveiraLeao.pdf
Lebano, Giustiniano, “La sfera armillare di Empedocle Agrigentino,” in: G. Lebano, Il Cielo Urbico. Cantica su modello dei Carmi Orfici, Omerici, e Sibillini, Napoli, 1859, p. 4.
Lebedev, Andrei, V. [ = Лебедев А.В.], (1989) Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. Часть 1. От эпических теокосмогоний до возникновения атомистики, Moscow: Наука 1989.
[Emp.: p.330-414. No Greek, only Russian translations. Fragments following numbering by Bollack for Physics (Origins according Bollack). Diels’s numbering for Catharms.]
– (1994) “Orpheus, Parmenides or Empedocles? The Aphrodite verses in the Naasene treatise of Hippolytos’s Elenchos,” Philologus, 138, 1, 1994, p. 24-31.
[B 66, B 98, B 153, B 154d.]
– (2015) «Теогония» Эпименида Критского и происхождение орфико-пифагорейского учения о реинкарнации // "Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. Чтения памяти И.М.Тронского", 22 – 24 июня 2015 г. Отв. ред. Н.Н. Казанский. Институт лингвистических исследований РАН, СПб 2015, сс. 550-585.
[= “The «Theogony» of Epimenides of Crete and the origin of the Orphic-Pythagorean doctrine of reincarnation,” in: Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology. Proceedings of the Tronsky Memorial conference 22-24 June 2015, ed. N.Kazansky, Institute of Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St.Petersburg, 2015, p. 550-585. An unpublished English translation of the article is on academia.edu, offered by A. Lebedev. – B 117 - Aelian and B 127. Selene, the Lion of Nemea, Aiakos and the reincarnation of souls.]
– (2017) “The Metaphor of liber naturae and the Alphabet Analogy in Heraclitusʼ logos- fragments (with some remarks on Plato’s “dream theory” and the origin of the concept of elements),” in: Heraklit im Kontext, ed. E. fantino, U. Muss, C. Schubert, K. Sier, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2017, (Studia Praesocratica, 8), p. 231-267.
– (2021) “The Aegean origin and early history of the Greek doctrines of reincarnation and immortality of the soul (Epimenides, Pherecydes, Pythagoras, and Onomacritus’ Orphica),” in: Myth, ritual and literature, ed. J. V. Ivanova & N. B. Bogdanovich, Moscow: HSE University Press 2021, (Orientalia et Classica), p. 219-283. Reprint in МИФ, РИТУА, Л ЛИТЕРАТУРА, Festschrift в честь профессора Н.В. Брагинской, Moscow 2023, p. 238-299.
Lecerf, Adrien, « Asclépius 143.6-148.34 (sur Aristote, Métaphysique Β 1, 995b20-996a11) », in: Le commentaire d’Asclépius aux livres Α-Γ de la Métaphysique d’Aristote : textes choisis et commentaires, ed. Alexandra Michalewski & Pieter d’Hoine, Brussels: Ousia 2023, (Cahiers de Philosophie Ancienne, 29), p. 227-273.
Leclerc, Jean (Clericus Ioannes), Bibliothèque choisie pour servir de suite à la bibliothèque universelle, année 1713, I, Amsterdam: Henri Schelte 1712-17132, (16911).
[Emp.: p. 78-83, 106. A reasonable criticism of Aristotle’s 3 theses on Emp.: 1) cognition is perception; 2) soul is composed of 4 roots; 3) the first creatures were engendered by chance) and p. 103-107 (some remarks on B 8, B 11, B 15, heavily influenced by Cudworth.]
Lefèvre, Eckard, “E di un poeta siciliano il Prometheus desmotus,” Orpheus, 8, 1987, p. 1-13.
Le Fèvre, Tanneguy, Les Poètes grecs, I, Saumur: D. de Lerpinière et J. Lesnier 1664.
[Emp. p. 69-73 = J. Gronovius, Thesaurus Graecarum antiquitatum, Tomus X, Vitae Poetarum gracorum: Ubi de eorumdem patria, moribus, scriptis, etc. perspicue ac compendiose disseritur, ex Gallico idiomate in Latinum translatae, Lugduni Batavorum: apud Petrum van der Aa 1701, p. 740-796.
[Emp.: p. 769-770.]
Legrand, Gérard, La Pensée des Présocratiques, Paris: Bordas 1970, (Pour connaître la pensée).
[Emp.: p. 139-151. General and superficial sketch of Emp. teaching. Reprint: Les Présocratiques, Paris: Bordas 1987, (Pour connaître). Emp.: p. 175-187.]
Lejewski, Czeslaw, “The concept of matter in presocratic philosophy,” in: The concept of matter in Greek and medieval philosophy, ed. McMullin E., Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press 1965, p. 25-36.
Lelli, Emmanuele & Giuliano Pisani (ed., transl.), Plutarco. Tutti i Moralia. Prima traduzione italiana completa, testo greco a fronte, Firenze-Milan: Bompiani 2017, (Il pensiero occidentale).
Le Manchec, Claude, Empédocle, (Location?): Les Éditions du Cénacle 2015 (Fichebook).
Lengauer, Włodzimierz & Stebnicka, Krystyna, “Empedokles i jego ‘Katharmoi’,” Ars Regia, 3/1 (6), 1994, p. 9-30.
[[+ +].]
Lenoir, Raymond, “La doctrine des quatre éléments et la philosophie ionienne,” Revue des études grecques, 40, 1927, p. 17-50.
[B 6.]
Lennox, James G., “Aristotle’s lantern,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 103, 1983, p. 147-151.
[B 84.]
Leonard, William Ellery, “The fragments of Empedocles,” The Monist, 17, n°3, 1907, p. 451-474.
– “Empedocles; the man, the philosopher, the poet,” The Monist 17, n°4, 1907, p. 560-569.
– The fragments of Empedocles, translated into English verse, Chicago: Open Court 1908.
[Reprint: LaSalle (Illinois): Open Court 1973. [+ +].]
Leone, Giuliana, “Epicuro ed Empedocle,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 221-240.
– “Empedocles in the Herculaneum Papyri: An update,” in: Presocratics and papyrological tradition. A philosophical reappraisal of the sources, Proceedings of the International Workshop held at the University of Trier (22–24 September 2016), ed. Ch. Vassallo, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2019, (Studia Praesocratica, 10), p. 299-331.
Leone, Petrus Aloisius M. (ed.), Ioannis Tzetzae. Historiae, recensuit P. A. M. L., Napoli: Libreria scientifica editrice1968.
[Tzetzes, Chiliades. B 111 p. 79, B 122.4 p. 492, B 134 p. 515-516.]
– Ioannis Tzetzae. Epistulae, recensuit P. A. M. L. Leipzig: Teubner 1972.
[Tzetzes, Letters, n°98, B 134.]
Lesage Gárriga, Luisa, Plutarch: On the face which appears in the orb of the Moon. Introduction, edition, English translation, and critical commentary, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2021, (Brill’s Plutarch Text Editions, 7).
– Plutarch’s Moon. A new approach to De facie quae in orbe lunae apparet, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2023, (Brill’s Plutarch Studies, 12).
Lesher, James H., “Early interest in knowledge,” in: The Cambridge Companion to ancient Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 225-249.
[Emp.: p. 241-245.]
Lesky, Albin, Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, Bern 1971.
[P. 249-252.]
Lesky, Erna, Die Zeugungs- und Vererbungslehren der Antike und ihr Nachwirken, Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur in Mainz, Franz Steiner 1951, (Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, 1950, 19).
https://wellcomecollection.org/works/x25k8hth/items?canvas=7&langCode=ger&sierraId=b18028688
[Emp.: Chapter “Die Wärmetheorie des Empedokles”, p. 1255-1262, other pagination as p. 31-38. A 81, B 63, B 65, B 67, B 92.]
Lethierry, Hugues (ed.), Empédocle : Amour / Haine. L’homme aux semelles d’airain, Paris: L’Harmattan 2021, (Ouverture philosophique).
Libanio, Deodato, Rafael, “Empédocles e a agonística da comunicação,” Kínesis, 14, 37, 2022, p. 12-34.
Libhart, Garth, “‘I shall tell a double tale’: empedoclean materialism and idealism in the English renaissance,” Diss. in Philosophy, University of Maryland, 2022.
[B 17.]
Licciardi, Ivan, Adriano, “Modi di guardare: su alcuni verba videndi omerici in Parmenide ed Empedocle,” in: Percepire apprendere agire, La riflessione filosofica antica sul rapporto tra mente e corpo, ed. R. L. Cardullo and G. R. Giardina, Sankt Augustin: Academia 2016, (Symbolon, 43).
Lieberg, Godo, “Il ruolo del piacere nella filosofia di Empedocle,” Sophia, 26, 1958, p. 221-225.
[A 86, par. 9.]
Lietard, G. A., Empédocle considéré comme philosophe et comme médecin, [Paris?] 1888.
[A biography of Emp.]
Lieu, Judith, M., Marcion and the making of a heretic: God and scripture in the second century, New York: Cambridge University Press 2015.
[Emp.: p. 90-92.]
Lincoln, Bruce, Myth, cosmos, and society. Indo-European themes of creation and destruction, Cambridge (Ma)-London: Harvard University Press 1986.
[Emp.: p. 35-40, 51-53, 136-138, 181-182, 189-190, 221. Sphairos and cosmic cycle as an Indo-European mythological theme. Purusa in the Aitareya Upanisad. Limbs, dismemberment. The material cosmos and the human body are complementary opposites. When the world is created, it is created out of man. And when mankind is created it is created from the cosmos. Death and resurrection are reciprocal processes, in which matter passes from microcosm to macrocosm and back again. B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 20, B 27, B 27 a, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 55, B 82, B 96, B 98, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 148.]
– Theorizing myth, narrative, ideology, and scholarship, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press 1999.
[P. 31-32, 156-159. B 3, B 23, B 114, B 117, B 131, B 146.]
Lioy, Paolo, “Un filosofo di duemila anni fa,” Rivista Sicula di Scienze, Letterature ed Arti, 3, 6, 1, 1871, p. 5-19.
[Reprinted in Conferenze scientifiche, Torino, Unione Tipografico-Editrice, 1872.]
Lisi, Francisco, “La relación entre la cosmología de Empédocles y la física de Platón a la luz de los nuevos descubrimientos papirológicos,” in: Εὔνοια. Estudios de filosofía antigua. Un homenaje a María Isabel Santa Cruz, ed. Correa Motta, A., Zamora Calvo & J.M., Bogotá (Universidad Nacional de Colombia): Primera 2009, p. 327-347.
Litwa, M. David, Refutation of all heresies. Translated with an introduction and notes, Atlanta: SBL Press 2015, (Writings from the Greco-Roman world, 40).
– Hermetica II. The excerpts of Stobaeus, papyrus fragments, and ancient testimonies in an English translation with notes and introduction, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2018.
– “Empedocles as daimon,” in: M. D. Litwa, Posthuman transformation in ancient Mediterranean thought: Becoming angels and demons, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021, p. 31-44.
[B 17, B 111, B 115.]
– Found Christianities: remaking the world of the second century CE, London-New York […]: t&t clark Bloomsbury 2022.
Livrea, Enrico, Apollonii Rhodii Argonauticon, Liber quartus. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento, Firenze: La nuova Italia 1973.
[Emp.: p. 205-209.]
Lloyd, Alfred H., “A study in the logic of the early Greek philosophy: Pluralism, Empedocles and Democritus,” Philosophical Review, 10, 1901, p. 261-270.
[General and quite ahistorical account of the alleged inner logic of Emp. system.]
– “The coin types of Selinus and the legend of Empedocles,” Numismatic Chronicle, 15, 1935, p. 73-93.
[A 1, par. 70.]
Lloyd, Geoffrey Ernest Richard, (1962) “Right and left in Greek philosophy,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 82, 1962, p. 56-66.
[Reprint in Methods and problems 1991.]
– (1963) “Who is attacked in On ancient medicine?,” Phronesis, 8, 1963, p. 108-126.
[A 71. Reprint in Methods and problems, 1991.]
– (1964) “The hot and the cold, the dry and the wet in Greek philosophy,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 84, 1964, p. 92-106.
[B 21. Reprint in Methods and problems 1991.]
– (1966) Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought, Cambridge 1966 (19872, 19923).
– (1968) “Plato as a natural scientist,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 88, 1968, p. 78-92.
[A 98, B 96, B 98, B 100.]
– (1975) “Alcmaeon and the early history of dissection,” Sudhoffs Archiv, 59, 2, 1975, p. 113-147.
[B 84, B 100.]
– (1990) Demystifying mentalities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.
[About metaphors: p. 21-25.]
– (1991) Methods and problems in Greek science: Selected papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 (19932)
– (1993) “Review of B. Inwood (ed., tr.): The Poem of Empedocles,” The Classical Review, 43.1, 1993, p. 164.
– (2005) Αρχαία ελληνική επιστήμη. Από τον Θαλή ώς τον Αριστοτέλη, μτφρ. Π. Καρλέτσα, Ηράκλειο : Πανεπιστημιακές εκδόσεις Κρήτης, 2005.
[P. 46-53 (Εμπεδοκλής).]
Lobeck, Christian August, Phrynichi Eclogae nominum et verborum Atticorum cum notis P. J. Nunnesii, D. Hoeschelii, J. Scaligeri et Cornelii de Pauw edidit, explicuit Ch. A. L., In libraria Weidmannia, Lipsiae 1820.
[P. 609: B 125: ἀλλογνῶτι. P. 732: B 115.4: ἁμαρτήσας.]
– Aglaophamus sive de theologiae mysticae graecorum causis I-II, Regimontii 1829.
– Pathologiae sermonis Graeci, Lipsiae 1843.
[Some emendations: B 19, B 78, B 100.23.]
– Ῥηματικόν sive verborum Graecorum et nominum verbalium technologia, Sumtu Fratrum Borntraeger, Regimontii 1846.
[P. 201 and 355, n. 6, the emendations of B 90.2 and B 137.2-3.]
Lobo Meeks, Jennifer, Allegory in early Greek philosophy, Stuttgart: ibidem 2020, (Studies in Historical Philosophy, 3).
Loeffler, Annette, “Ancrage énonciatif, mise en discours et pragmatique - Cosmos et situation de communication dans les fragments d’Empédocle,” Sémiotiques, 10, juin 1996, p. 123-136.
http://www.revue-texto.net/Parutions/Semiotiques/SEM_n10_8.pdf
[See also Rosenfeld-Löffler.]
Loew, Emanuel, “Die Vorsokratiker über Veränderung, Wahrheit und Erkenntnismöglichkeit,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 81, 2, 1932, p. 104-128.
[Emp.: p. 106-114, B 2, B 17, B 21, B 26, B 110.]
– “Empedokles, Anaxagoras und Demokrit,” Wiener Studien, 55, 1937, p. 32-47.
[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 106, B 107, B 108, B 110, B 132, B 134.]
Lommatzsch, Bernhard, Heinrich, Carl, Die Weisheit des Empedokles nach ihren Quellen [...], Berlin: G. Reimer 1830. Reprint in Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2018.
[Speculative account of the principal Empedoclean theses plus the translation of fragments. [[+ +].]
Lombardo, Stanley, Parmenides and Empedocles. The fragments in Verse Translation, San Francisco: Grey Fox 1982.
[[ + ].]
Long, Alex, G., “Immortality in Empedocles,” Apeiron, 2017, 50, 1, p. 1-20.
[B 21, B 23, B 35, B 38, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 131, B 146, B 147.]
– Death and immortality in ancient philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019, (Key themes in ancient philosophy)
[Emp.: p. 22-27.]
Long, Anthony, A., “Thinking and sense-perception in Empedocles: mysticism or materialism?” The Classical Quarterly, 16, 2, 1966, p. 256-276.
– “Review of D. O’Brien, ECC,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 90, 1970, p. 238-239.
[Unimportant.]
– “Empedocles’ cosmic cycle in the sixties,” in: The Pre-Socratics: a collection of critical essays, ed. A. P. D. Mourelatos, Princeton: Princeton University Press 19932 (New York: Anchor Press 19741), p. 397-425.
[B 17, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 35, B 62, B 98.]
– Greek models of mind and self, Cambridge (Ma.)-London: Harvard University Press 2015, (Revealing antiquity, 22).
[Emp.: p. 76-80; B 115.]
Long, Herbert Strainge, A study of the doctrine of metempsychosis in Greece from Pythagoras to Plato, (diss.), Princeton 1948 (19421).
[B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 126, B 127, B 129, B 147.]
– “Plato’s doctrine of metempsychosis and its source,” The Classical Weekly, 41, 10, 1948, p. 149-155.
– “The unity of Empedocles’ thought,” American Journal of Philology, 70, 1949, p. 142-158.
Longo, Angela, “Empedocle e l’allegoria nella Confutazione di tutte le eresie attribuita a Ippolito di Roma,” in: Des évêques, des écoles et des hérétiques. Actes du colloque international sur la Réfutation de toutes les hérésies, Genève, 13-14 juin 2008, ed. G. Aragione & E. Norelli, Lausanne: Éditions du Zèbre 2011, p. 119-133.
Longo, Oddone, “Simbiogenesi Empedoclea,” Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica, 1999, p. 129-152.
[B 57 - B 62, B 97 etc.]
Longrigg, James, (1963) “Philosophy and medicine: some early interactions,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 67, 1963, p. 147-175.
– (1964) “Galen on Empedocles (fragment 67),” Philologus, 108, 1964, p. 297-300.
[B 67.]
– (1965) “Empedocles’s fiery fish,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 28, 1965, p. 314-315.
[Respiration, heat, vital heat, cooling water, A 73.]
– (1965) “Κρυσταλλοειδῶς,” The Classical Quarterly,15, 2, 1965, p. 249-251.
[Empedocles' similes, vault of the outer heaven, salt, A 30, A 51, A 54, A 66, B 56.]
– (1967) “Roots,” The Classical Review, 17, 1, 1967, p. 1-4.
[Elements, particles, mixture, sun, fire, Sphairos, A 41, A 43, B 27.]
– (1970) “Ice of bronze (Lucretius I.493),” The Classical Review, 20, 1970, p. 8-9.
[Metaphors, similes, fire in a solidifying role, A 69.]
– (1972) “Zeno’s cosmology,” The Classical Review, 22, 1972, p. 170-171.
– (1974) “Empedocles’ fertile fish (B 74),” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 94, 1974, p. 173-174.
[B 74.]
– (1974) “Empedocles, Juno, and De Natura Deorum ii. 66,” The Classical Review, 24, 1974, p. 173.
[B 6.]
– (1975) “Two notes on Theophrastus De sensibus,” Philologus, 119, 1975, p. 163-169.
[A 86, par. 1 a 9, B 99.]
– (1976) “The “roots of all things”,” Isis, 67, 1976, p. 420-438.
[B 6.]
– (1985) “A seminal 'debate' in the fifth century B.C.?,” in: Aristotle on nature and living things: Philosophical and historical studies presented to David M. Balme on his seventieth birthday, ed. A. Gotthelf, Pittsburgh-Bristol: Mathesis publications, Bristol Classical Press 1985, p. 277-287.
[A 68, A 77, A 78, A 79, A 82, A 84, B 68, B 70, B 92, B 98, B 105, B 150.]
– (1985) “Elements and after: a study in presocratic physics of the second half of the fifth century,” Apeiron, 19.2, 1985, p. 93-115.
– (1989) “Presocratic philosophy and Hippocratic medicine,” History of Science, 27, 1, 1989, p. 1-39.
[A 74, B 6, B 21, B 23, B 111.]
– (1993) “Empedocles and the plague of Selinus: a cock and bull story?,” in: Tria Lustra: Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent Founder and Editor of Liverpool Classical Monthly by Some of Its Contributors on the Occasion of the 150th Issue, Issue 3 of Liverpool classical papers, ed. H.D. Jocelyn & H. Hurt, Liverpool: Liverpool Classical Monthly 1993, p. 29-34.
[B 111, A 1, par. 70.]
– (1993) Greek rational medicine: philosophy and medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians, London: Routledge 1993.
[A 77, A 78, A 79, A 85, A 86, B 6, B 21, B 65, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 105, B 111.]
Lonie, Ian M., “Medical theory in Heraclides of Pontus,” Mnemosyne, 4, 18, 1965, p. 126-143.
[A 1, par. 60-1, ad B 1152.]
– “On the botanical excursus in De natura pueri,” Hermes, 97, 1969, p. 391-411.
López Eire, A.,“Sobre los orígines de la oratoria I,” Minerva, 1, 1987, p. 13-31.
Lo Presti, Roberto, “Empedocle su percezione e cognizione,” in: In forma di senso: l’encefalocentrismo del trattato ippocratico Sulla malattia sacra nel suo contesto epistemologico, Roma: Carocci 2008, (Studi e ricerche. Sezione greca / Aglaia, Dipartimento di studi greci, latini e musicali, Università di Palermo, 10), p. 30-39.
Lorson, Thomas, Les Sélénites imaginaires habitants de la Lune dans le De facie quae in orbe lunae apparet de Plutarque, les Histoires vraies et l’Icaroménippe de Lucien, Mémoire de Master mondes anciens, Lyon III, 2019.
Lortzing, Franz, Bericht über die griechischen Philosophen vor Sokrates für die Jahre 1876-1897: Empedokles. 1. Zur Kritik uud Erklärung der Fragmente. 2. Zur Lehre und zum Leben des Empedokles,” Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, 116, 1904, p. 1-60.
[Reinach, Diels, Blass, Bergk, Knatz, Gomperz, Platt, Ward, Radloff, Wieck.]
– “Review of C. E. Millerd, Empedocles,” Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift, 31/22, 1911, col. 665-673.
Lorusso, AM., “Dal semplice al complesso: valenza strutturale e didattica della tecnica dell’eco in Empedocle,” Quaderni del Dipartimento di filologia linguistica e tradizione classica «Augusto Rostagni», n. s. 4 - 2005, Bologna: Pàtron 2006, p. 109-124.
Lovejoy, Arthur O., “The meaning of Φυσις in the Greek physiologers,” The philosophical Review, 18, 4, 1909, p. 369-383.
[B 8, B 17, B 63, B 110.]
Lucarini, Carlo Martino, “Il ciclo cosmico di Empedocle e l’esegesi del Papiro di Strasburgo (PStrasb. Gr. inv. 1665-1666),” Philosophical Papyri, 1, 2023, p. 137-152.
[B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 26, B 35, B 62, B 76, a(i), a(ii), c, b, d, f, Scholies.]
– “Zu Empedokles, D 100 + 178 b L.-M. (= A 66 D.-K.),” Museum Helveticum, 81, 1, 2024, p. 31-33.
[A 66. Tzetzes. φορᾶς instead of φθορᾶς.]
Luchte, James, Pythagoras and the doctrine of transmigration: Wandering souls, London-New York: Continuum 2009, (Continuum studies in ancient philosophy).
– Early Greek thought: before the dawn, London-New York: Continuum 2011.
[Chap. 11: Love, Strife and mind – Empedocles and Anaxagoras.]
Luciani, Sabine, “Philosophie et esthétique du mouvement dans le “De rerum natura”,” in: Présence de Lucrèce: Actes du colloque tenu à Tours 3-5 Décembre 1998, ed. Rémy Poignault, Université de Tours 1999, p. 65-76.
[A comparison of Lucretius with Democritus and Emp.]
Lucking, David, “The elements so mix’d": Empedoclean cosmology in The Tempest,” Skenè, 5, 1, 2019, p. 23-43.
Ludwich, Arthur, Aristarchs homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos, II, Leipzig: Teubner 1885.
[P. 308-311 and 321-322. Useful for a count of 455 verses with spondees [S] and/or dactyls [D], and a comparaison with Homer, Hesiod and other authors writing in hexameters.]
– De quibusdam Timonis Phliasii fragmentis, Königsberg: Regimontii, ex officina Hartungiana, 1903.
[B 38.1.]
Lumpe, Adolf, “Der Begriff 'Element' im Altertum,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 7, 1962, p. 285-293, [B 6.]
Lüth, Johann Christoph, Die Struktur des Wirklichen im empedokleischen System “Über die Natur”, Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain 1970.
Luther Wilhelm, “Wahrheit, Licht und Erkenntnis in der griechischen Philosophie bis Demokrit: Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung des Zusammenhangs von Sprache und philosophischem Denken,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 10, 1966, p. 1-240.
[Empedocles: chap. IX, p. 124-137; A 86, B 2, B 3, B 17, B 23, B 84, B 89, B 90, B 109, B 110, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134.]
– Commentariorum in Aratum reliquae, Berlin: Weidmann 1898.
[P. 34: A 35; p. 31: B 6; p. 37: B 28; p. 43: B 45, p. 97: ad B27.]
Maass, Ernst, Orpheus. Untersuchungen zur griechischen römischen altchristlichen Jenseitsdichtung und Religion, Munich: C. H. Beck 1895.
[B 115.1-2, B 121.3.]
– Commentariorum in Aratum reliquae, Berlin: Weidmann 1898.
[P. 34: A 35; p. 31: B 6; p. 37: B 28; p. 43: B 45, p. 97: ad B27.]
Maas, Paul, “Zu Abdankungsgedicht des Nikolaos Muzalon: I. Literarisches,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 35, 1935, p. 2-7.
[B 121.2 and 4.]
– in: Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 36, 1936, p. 456-457.
[B 143.]
– Greek Metre, Oxford 1962.
Macauley, David Mark, Be-wildering order: Toward an ecology of the elements in ancient Greek philosophy and beyond, diss., State University of New York - Stony Brook 1998.
– “The flowering of environmental roots and the four elements in Presocratic philosophy: From Empedocles to Deleuze and Guattari,” World views: Global religions, culture, and ecology, 9, 3, 2005, p. 281-314.
[B 6.]
– Elemental philosophy: earth, air, fire, and water as environmental ideas, Albany (NY): SUNY Press 2010.
http://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1421&context=eip –
[P. 103-136: The flowering of ecological roots: Empedocles elemental thought. See on-line: Gruen, Lori (2012) Review of "elemental philosophy: earth, air, fire, and water as environmental ideas", in: Essays in philosophy, 13, 1, Article 22.]
[B 6.]
Macé, Arnaud, L’invention de la nature en Grèce ancienne, Dossier HDR sous la dir. P. Demont, Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2013.
[A 51, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 26, B 33, B 61, B 86, B 87, B 151.]
– “La fonction métaphysique de la poétique végétale d’Empédocle,” Gaia, 26, 2023, p. 1-16.
[A 70, A 72, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 26, B 57, B 62.]
Mace, Sarah T., “Review of L’Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665-1666) by Alain Martin and Oliver Primavesi,” Classical World, 95, 2, 2002, p. 195-197.
Mackenzie, K. T. M. (Tom), (2016) “The contents of Empedocles’ Poem: A new argument for the single-poem hypothesis,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 200, 2016, p. 25-32.
– (2020) “Empedocles, personal identity, and the narrative of the fallen daimōn,” Phoenix, 74, 1-2, 2020, p. 111-130.
[Published in January 2022 despite the date 2020. B 6, B 8, B 9, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 59, B 109, B 115, B 117, B 126, B 134, B 137, B 146.]
– (2021) Poetry and poetics in the Presocratic philosophers: reading Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles as literature, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2021.
[Emp.: p. 102-176. B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 28, B 38, B 71, B 76, B 83, B 96, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 117, B 122, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 140, B 142, B 146, B 147.]
– (2022) “Hesiod, the presocratic poets, Aristeas, Epimenides and the gold tablets: genre and narrative,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 81-103.
[B 2, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 129.]
– “Review of Reconstructing Empedocles’ thought, by Ch. Ferella 2024,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2024.11.04, 2024. Online.
Macris, Constantinos, “Pythagore, un maître de sagesse charismatique de la fin de la période archaïque,” in: Carisma profetico. Fattore di innovazione religiosa, ed. Giovanni Filoramo, Brescia 2003, p. 249-289.
[P. 255-257: B 129. Macris changed his views in an article with Skarsouli, later in 2012.]
– “Télaugès [de Samos],” in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, VI, ed. R. Goulet, Paris: CNRS Éditions 2016, p. 722-731.
– “Pythagore de Samos” + Annexe II, “Les Pythagoriciens anciens - Influence et réception du pythagorisme : tradition pythagoricienne, pseudépigraphie, revival, Nachleben,” in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, VII, D’Ulpien à Zoticus, avec des Compléments pour les tomes antérieurs, ed. R. Goulet, Paris: CNRS Éditions 2018, p. 681-850, 1025-1174.
http://www.brepolis.net/
[Emp. : p. 700-701 (B 129), 707 (Alciamas & E.), 714 (Héraclide & Emp.), 1095-1097 (réception du pythagorisme chez Emp.) et passim.]
– “Ascèse, pureté, abstinence et jeûne dans la tradition pythagoricienne,” in: La dîme du corps : doctrines et pratiques du jeûne, vol. 1 : Jeûnes anciens et orientaux. Jeûnes d’islam, ed. H. Benkheira & S. De Franceschi, Turnhout: Brepols 2023, p. 125-175, (Bibliothèque de l’École des Hautes Études, Sciences religieuses, 201).
[B 6, B 127, B 129, B 137, B 140, B 144.]
Macris, Constantinos & Skarsouli, Pénélope, “La sagesse et les pouvoirs du mystérieux τις du fragment 129 d’Empédocle,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 75, 3, 2012, p. 357-377.
[B 129.]
Maddalena, Antonio, I Pitagorici. Raccolta delle testimonianze e dei frammenti pervenutici, Bari: Laterza 1954, (Filosofi antichi e medievali).
[4 elements. B 129: p. 64 n.3 and p. 343-346. Metempsychosis: p. 65 n. 4.]
Madvig, Johan Nicolas, Adversaria critica ad scriptores graecos et latinos I: De arte conjecturali. Emendationes graecae, Hauniae: Sumptibus Librariae Gyldendalianae (F. Hegel) 1871, p. 656.
[B 5.]
Maggi, Paolo, “La “Clessidra” di Empedocle ed un vasetto della Ca’ Morta,” Rivista archeologica dell’antica provincia e diocesi di como, 170, 1988, p. 5-10.
[B 100.9.]
Maggio, Alessandro, “Sulle tracce della dea Nesti: Empedocle e Alessi,” Incontri di filologia classica, 18, 2018-2019, p. 103-150.
https://www.openstarts.units.it/bitstream/10077/30682/4/2_IFC_XVIII_2018-2019_web.pdf
[B 6, B 96.]
Magnus, Hugo, Die Anatomie des Auges bei den Griechen und Römern, Leipzig: Veit & Comp. 1878.
[B 84.]
– Die Augenheilkunde der Alten, Breslau: J. U. Kern’s Verlag (Max Müller) 1901.
[B 84.]
Magomedov, Gamid A. (Магомедов Гамид Абдулганиевич), “Единство и множественность космогонического процесса в поэме Эмпедокла,” Идеи и идеалы, 15, 1, 1, 2023, p. 87-104.
[= “The unity and multiplicity of the cosmogonic process in Empedocles’ poem”. Идеи и идеалы = Ideas and Ideals. B 17, a (i) and (ii) MP.]
Maignan [Maignanus], Emanuel, Cursus philosophicus, III, Toulouse: R. Bosc 1653. Lyon: J. Gregoire 1673.
https://download.digitale-sammlungen.de/pdf/1438672422bsb10944175.pdf
https://download.digitale-sammlungen.de/BOOKS/download.pl?id=bsb10944175 http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb10944175_00005.html
[Emp. about light: p. 1561 in the edition of 1653 (Caput 15. Propositio 13), or p. 421 in the edition of 1673. The edition of 1673 has the four volumes published in 1653 in a single book.]
Malcolm, John, “On avoiding the void,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, IX, 1991, p. 75-94.
Malengreau, P., “De la pensée d’Empédocle à la mythologie freudienne,” Revue de psychologie et des sciences de l’éducation, 6, 1971, p. 330-354.
Manetti, Daniela, “Valore semantico e risonanze culturali della parola φύσις,” La Parola del Passato, 1973, p. 426-444.
[Β 8, A 732.]
Mann, Joel, E., “All things never change: circular time in Empedocles,” Philosophical Inquiry, 43, 1-2, 2019, p 72-97.
Mansfeld, Jaap, (1964) Die Offenbarung des Parmenides und die menschliche Welt, Assen 1964.
– (1967) “Heraclitus on the Psychology and Physiology of Sleep and on Rivers,” Mnemosyne, 20, 1967, p. 1-29.
[Emp., p. 23: B 105.]
– (1968) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle, I, 1965,” Mnemosyne, 21, 4, 1968, p. 426-428.
– (1972) “Ambiguity in Empedocles B 17.3-5,” Phronesis, 17, 1972, p. 17-39.
[B 8, B 9, B 12, B 17.]
– (1978) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle. Part 2: Les Origines, fragments et témoignages. Part 3: Les Origines, Commentaire. 1969,” Mnemosyne, 31, 2, 1978, p. 207-209.
– (1979) “Providence and the destruction of the universe in early stoic thought,” in: Studies in Hellenistic religions, ed. M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden: Brill 1979, p. 129-188. Reprinted as Study I in Mansfeld, J., Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot.
[Zeno of Citium and Empedocles: p. 170-173.]
– (1981) “Bad world and demiurge: A ‘gnostic’ motif from Parmenides and Empedocles to Lucretius and Philo,” in: Studies in gnosticism and Hellenistic religions presented to Gilles Quispel on the occasion of his 65-th birthday, ed. R. van der Broek & M. J. Vermaseren, Leiden: Brill 1981, p. 261-314. Reprinted as Study XIV in Mansfeld, J., Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot.
[Emp.: p. 278-290. A 30, A 37, A 42, A 49, A 68, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26-28, B 30-31, B 35, B 54, B 52, B 57-B 98, B 112, B 115, B 116, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 146, B 147.]
– (1985) “Heraclitus, Empedocles, and others in a Middle Platonist cento in Philo of Alexandria,” Vigiliae Christianae, 39, 1985, p. 131-156. Reprinted as Study VII in Mansfeld, J., Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot.
[B 16, B 115, B 117, B 121.]
– (1985) “Review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Mnemosyne, 38, 1-2, 1985, p. 183-188.
– (1986) Die Vorsokratiker II: Zenon, Empedokles, Anaxagoras, Demokrit. Griechisch/Deutsch. Auswahl der Fragmente, Übersetzung und Erläuterungen von J. M., Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 1986, (Universal-Bibliothek, Nr. 7966).
[7. Kapitel Empedokles: p. 56-155. [ + ].]
– (1986) “Aristotle, Plato, and the preplatonic doxography and chronography,” in: Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, ed. G. Cambiano, Torino: Tirrenia Stampatori 1986, p. 1-59.
– (1989) Studies in later Greek philosophy and gnosticism, London: Variorum reprints 1989, (Variorum collected studies series, 292). Variorum Reprints is now Ashgate, in Aldershot.
– (1992) Heresiography in context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a source for Greek philosophy, Leiden-New York-Köln: Brill 1992.
[P. 50-52: “Pythagoras, Empedocles, Heraclitus, Plato and Aristotle”. P. 208-243: “The Pythagorean tradition, continued: Empedocles and Heraclitus”. B 6, B 16, B 30, B 21, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119.]
– (1994) “A Lost Manuscript of Empedocles’ Katharmoi,” Mnemosyne, 4, 47, 1994, p. 79-82.
– (1995) “Insight by Hindsight. Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 40, 1995, p. 225-232.
[P. 227: B 6.]
– (1995) “Critical note: Empedocles and his interpreters,” Phronesis, 40, 1, 1995, p. 109-115.
[A refutation of P. Kingsley’s article in: Phronesis, 39, 1994, p. 235-254; A 33, B 6. Reprinted with light modifications in Critical note: Empedocles and his interpreters,” in: Mansfeld J., Runia D.T. Aëtiana, III, studies in the doxographical traditions of ancient philosophy, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2010, (Philosophia antiqua, 118), p. 333-340.]
– (1996) Aristote et la structure du De sensibus de Théophraste,” Phronesis, 41, 2, 1996, p. 158-188.
[Mainly for Empedocles: p. 161-3 and 175-7; B 106, B 108, B 63, B 109, B 107, B 105, A 86.]
– “Parménide et Héraclite avaient-ils une théorie de la perception ?,” Phronesis, 44, 4, 1999, p. 326-346.
[Mainly for Empedocles: p. 334-335, 344.]
– (2000) “Physical Doxai in the Phaedo,” in: The winged chariot: collected essays on Plato and Platonism in honour of L.M. de Rijk, ed. M. Kardaun and J. Spruyt, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill 2000, (Brill's studies in intellectual history, 100), p. 1-17.
[B 35, B 71, B 96, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 115.]
– “Book notes: Presocratics,” Phronesis, 50, 4, 2005, p. 335-345.
[Review of S. Trépanier, Empedocles. An interpretation, 2004.]
– (2006) “Review of J. Bollack, Empédocle: Les Purifications. 2003,” Mnemosyne, 59, 3, 2006, p. 467-468.
– (2011) “Aristotle on Anaxagoras in relation to Empedocles in Metaphysics A,” Philologus, 155, 2, 2011, p. 361-366.
– (2015) “Review of Flashar, H., Bremer, D., Rechenauer G. (eds.), Ueberweg. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, Bd. 1, 2013,” Mnemosyne, 68, 2015, p. 331-343.
[Emp.: p. 340-341. O. Primavesi. The reconstruction of the double cosmic cycle. The concept of récit spéculaire (‘Spiegelerzahlung’). B17.7. The ‘we’.]
– Studies in early Greek philosophy. A collection of papers and one review, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2018, (Philosophia Antiqua, 151).
[“Insight by hindsight: Intentional unclarity in presocratic proems”: p. 40-51; “The presocratic philosophers: a discussion of a new handbook”: p. 318-331; “Hermann Diels (1848–1922)”: p. 368-406.]
– (2019) “Echoes of Theophrastus’ De sensibus in Books 4 and 1 of the Aëtian Placita,” Rhizomata, 7, 2, 2019, (Special Issue: Topics in Theophrastus’ De sensibus), p. 146-167.
Mansfeld, Jaap & Algra, Keimpe, “Interpretative Thêtas in the Strasbourg Empedocles,” in: Empsychoi logoi––Religious innovations in Antiquity. Studies in honour of Pieter Willem van der Horst, ed. Houtman A., De Jong A. & M. Misset-van de Weg M., Leiden-Boston: Brill 2008, (Ancient Judaism and early Christianity, 73).
[B 17, B 20, B 26, B 35, B 36, B 115, B 139, a(i) 6, c 3, d 5-6.]
Mansfeld, Jaap & Primavesi, Oliver, Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch / Deutsch, ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert von J. Mansfeld und O. Primavesi, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 2011, (Reclam Bibliothek).
[Reprint with minor addenda and corrigenda in 2012, Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, Bd. 18971. [ + ].]
– Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch / Deutsch, ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert von J. Mansfeld und O. Primavesi, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 2021², (Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, 14173).
[[ + ].]
Mansfeld, Jaap & Runia, David, Aëtiana, The method and intellectual context of a doxographer: II.1,The Compendium, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2009, (Philosophia antiqua, 114).
[A35, A 49, A 50, A 51, A 52, A 53, A 56, A 58, A 59, A 60, A 61, B 84, B 109a.]
– Aëtiana, The method and intellectual context of a doxographer: III, Studies in the doxographical traditions of ancient philosophy, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2010, (Philosophia antiqua, 118).
– Aëtiana V (4 vols.): An edition of the reconstructed text of the Placita with a commentary and a collection of related texts, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2020, (Philosophia Antiqua, 153 [1,2,3,4]).
[Vol. 1: xxii, 717 pp.; Vol. 2: xviii, 628 pp.; Vol. 3: xviii, 711 pp.; Vol. 4: vi, 259 pp. – Emp.: B 6, p. 256-257, 261 // B 121-123, 367 // B 27, B 28, 399-400// B 23, B 21, B 6, B 71, 541-545 // B 8, 715 // Sun, 985, 1017-1019 //Soul, 1432 // Blood, 1481 // B 3, 1588 // B 84, 1636-1637 // B 99, 1676 // B 100, 1724 // Sexes, 1822 // B 62, 1942-1943 // B 96, 1970-1974 // A 85, 2004. [+ +].]
Manso, Johann Caspar Friedrich, “Der Traum des Empedokles [oder] über die Erkennbarkeit der Natur (Somnium Empedoclis),” in: Erscheinungen und Traüme, übersetzt und herausgegeben von Georg Schatz, Band II, Leipzig 1791 (= J. C. F. Manso, Vermischte Schriften, Leipzig: Dyk 1801, II.160-173).
Manuli, Paola & Vegetti, Mario, Cuore, sangue e cervello. Biologia e antropologia nel pensiero antico, Milan: Episteme 1977, (Monografie, 7).
[Reprint by Petite Plaisance, Pistoia, 2009, (Il giogo). P. 55-71.]
Marcinkowska-Rosół, Maria, “Diogenes Laertios: Epigramy o Empedoklesie (VIII 75),” Meander, 1-4, 2008.
– “Empedocles B 105 and the definition of human mind,” Eranos, 105, 2008-2009, p. 118-123.
[B 105.]
Marcinkowska-Rosół, Maria & Raphaele Rosół, “Diogenes Laertios: Epigramy o Empedoklesie (VIII 75),” Meander, 1, 4, 2008, p. 125-128.
https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=17479
Marcinkowski, Alexandre (ed.), Clémence Ramnoux. Oeuvres, tome I and tome II, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2020, (Encre marine).
Marcovich, Miroslav, Heraclitus, Merida: The Los Andes University Press 1967.
Margagliotta, Giusy Maria, Il demonico in Platone e la nascita della demonologia platonica, diss., Universität Freiburg i. B., 2017.
[Emp.: p. 37-53. B 115, B 117, B 122, B 128, B 137, B 146, B 147.]
Margoliouth, David Samuel, The Poetics of Aristotle, London-New-York-Toronto: Hodder and Stoughton 1911.
[B 138, B 143.]
Mariat, Lora, “Résonance du corps, résonance de l’âme : le phénomène de l’écho entre physiologie et psychologie, d’Alcméon à Platon,” Dialogues d’histoire ancienne, 48, 2, 2022, p. 53-72.
[A 86, B 99.]
– L’air, les âmes, les sons : conceptions matérialistes de l’invisible entre philosophie présocratique et médecine hippocratique, Diss. Université de Fanche-Comté, 2023.
[Aristophanes, Clouds, meteorology. Soul, Anaximenes, Anaxagoras, Heraclitus, Diogenes of Apollonia, Empedocles. Pores and effluences. Hearing. Sounds. A 1, A 14, A 30, A 49, A 51, A 53, A 58, A 70, A 78, A 86, A 87, A 92, B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 84, B 89, B 96, B 100, B 105, B 106, B 115, B 133, B 134, B 149.]
Marin, Maurizio, “Empedocle, il Pitagorico di Afrodite,” Salesianum, 60, 1998, p. 65-80.
Marioti, I., “Tradurre i poeti greci,” in: La traduzione dei classici greci e latini in Italia oggi: problemi, prospettive, iniziative editoriali, ed. P. Ianni & I. Mazzini, Macerata 1992, p. 87-98.
Marković, Daniel, “Vergil’s Empedoclean Universe,” Lucida intervalla, 43, 2014, p 67-90.
http://emu.f.bg.ac.rs/lucidaintervalla/issues/43(2014).pdf
[B 128.]
– “Empedocles in the Aetna?,” Lucida intervalla, 44, 2015, p. 77-91.
Marmodoro, Anna, “Empedocles’s metaphysics,” Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 1-4.
Marshall, Hallie, Rebecca, Plutarch as a source for Empedocles, Thesis for the degree of Master of Arts, Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada), 2002.
Marshall, Laura Ann, Uncharted territory: receptions of philosophy in Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica, diss., The Ohio State University, 2017.
[Chapter 2: Empedocles, p. 45-148. B 17, B 23, B27, B 29, B 35, B 52, B 62, B 115, B 124.]
Marsoner, Agostino, “Sul fr. 128 di Empedocle,” Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell’Università di Napoli, 15, n. s. III, 1972-3, p. 5-10.
[B 128.]
– “A proposito di una recente edizione di Empedocle,” Annali della facoltà di lettere e filosofie dell’Università di Napoli, 17, 1974-5, p. 43-48.
– “Studi Empedoclei,” La Parola del Passato, 38, 209, 1983, p. 150-160.
– Forma et pensiero nella filosofia greca arcaica, Galatina: Congedo 1992, (Università degli studi della Basilicata - Potenza, 10).
[P. 117-146, chap. VI: B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 26, B 30, B 35, B 131, B 133, B 134.]
Martano, Giuseppe, (1963) “Bagliori della chimica moderna in Empedocle d’Agrigento,” Kokalos, 9, 1963, p. 3-18.
[Reprint in Martano, G., Studi di storia del pensiero antico, Napoli-Firenze, 1968, p. 53-81.]
– (1969) “Il senso del concreto nei contributi sicelioti alla storia del pensiero greco,” Kokalos, 14-5, 1968-9, p. 280-294.
– (1982) “Suggestioni Empedoclee nella poesia di Hölderlin,” Discorsi, 2/2, 1982, p. 197-211.
– (1987) “Physis, arete, dike nella cultura greca dell’età arcaica,” Elenchos, 8, 1987, p. 25-41.
[A 732.]
– (1987) “Introduzione,” in: Domenico Scinà, Memorie sulla vita e filosofia d’Empedocle, Volume primo, (reprint of 1813), Bologna: Cappelli 1987, (Universale il Portolano), p. V-XXXVI.
Martin, Alain, (1995) “Un papyrus inédit d’Empédocle dans la collection de Strasbourg,” Gnomon, 67, 1995, p. 734-735.
– (1997) “D’Achmîm à Strasbourg, sur les traces d’Empédocle,” Bulletin de la classe des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques - Académie royale de Βelgique, 6/8, 1997, p. 121-137.
– (1998) “L’Empedocle di Strasburgo: aspetti papirologici,” Elenchos, 19, 2, 1998, p. 65-80.
[Elenchos 19, 2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.]
– (2000) “Le papyrus de Strasbourg,” in: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, III, ed. R. Goulet, Paris: C.N.R.S.-Éditions 2000, p. 67-70.
[Emp. : p. 68-72.]
– (2002) “Review of Brad Inwood, The Poem of Empedocles, revised edition, 2000,” L’Antiquité Classique, 71, 2002, p. 257-258.
[Papyrus of Strasburg.]
– (2003) “Empédocle, Fr. 142 D.-K. Nouveau regard sur un papyrus d’Herculanum,” Cronache Ercolanesi, 33, 2003, p. 43-52.
[B 6, B 62, B 115, B 120, B 142.]
– (2007) “Empedocle poeta. Alcune considerazioni sul fr. B 152 DK,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, p. 15-29.
[B 152.]
– (2007) “Review of Annette Rosenfeld-Löffler, La poétique d’Empédocle. Cosmologie et métaphore,” L’Antiquité Classique, 76, 2007, p. 246-247.
– (2021) “Dans l’atelier de la traductrice, avec Marguerite Yourcenar,” in: Le médecin et le livre. Hommages à Marie-Hélène Marganne, ed. Antonio Ricciardetto et al., Lecce: Pensa Multimedia 2021, (Fuori Collana), p. 531-544.
[B 20.]
Martin, Alain & Primavesi, Oliver, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg: (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666). Introduction, édition et commentaire, with an English summary, Strasbourg-Berlin-New York: Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg - W. de Gruyter 1999.
[[+ +].]
Martin, Hubert, Jr., “Plutarch’s Citation of Empedocles at Amatorius 756 D,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 10, 1969, p. 57-70.
[B 17.]
Martin, Thomas-Henri, Mémoire sur les hypothèses astronomiques des plus anciens philosophes de la Grèce étrangers à la notion de la sphéricité de la terre,” Mémoires de l’Institut national de France, Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 29, 2ème partie, 1879, p. 29-252.
[Emp.: p. 211-235.]
Martínez Nieto, Roxana, Beatriz, “Particularidades morfológico-semánticas del léxico de Empédocles,” in: Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, ed. Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde & Ramón González Ruiz, Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2008, p. 561-566.
http://dspace.unav.es/dspace/bitstream/10171/21069/1/Particularidades%20morfol%C3%B3gico%20sem%C3%A1nticas%20del%20l%C3%A9xico.pdf
[B 5, B 12, 24, B 25, B 35, B 49, B 51, B 56, B 61, B 122, B 129, B 134, B 148.]
– “Novedades en los estudios de transmisión textual de Empédocles: los comentarios de Simplicio,” in: Dialéctica histórica y compromiso social. Homenaje a Domingo Plácido, 2, ed. C. Fornis Vaquero, J. Gállego & P.M. López Barja de Quiroga, Zaragoza: Libros Pórtico, 2010, p. 721-730.
Marzillo, Patrizia, Scaliger als Gräzist und Forscher antiker Philosophie,” Mitteilungen, 2, 2010, p. 35-43.
http://www.sfb-frueheneuzeit.uni-muenchen.de/mitteilungen
[P. 39: Die pseudo-empedokleische Sphäre.].
– “‘Would you check my edition please?’ Scaliger’s annotations to some poetical/ philosophical texts,” in: Para/Textuelle Verhandlungen zwischen Dichtung und Philosophie in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Bernhard Huss, Patrizia Marzillo & Thomas Ricklin, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter 2011, (Pluralisierung & Autorität 26), p. 399-427.
[P. 402-413: 2.1. And p. 422-423.]
Marzullo, Benedetto, I sofismi di Prometeo, Firenze: La nuova Italia 1993.
[B 38.]
Mastrofili, M., Il sistema fisiologico di Empedocle di Agrigento, Napoli: Giannini 1914.
Matsumoto, A., “A study on the fragments of Gorgias,” The Hiroshima University Studies, 26, 1966, p. 29-50.
Mauduit, Christine, “Les miracles d’Empédocle ou la naissance d’un thaumaturge,” Bulletin de l’Association G. Budé, 4, 1998 (février 1999), p. 289-309.
[B 111.]
Mauduit, Christine & Saetta Cottone, Rossella, “Voir ou entendre : faut-il choisir ? Une analyse de la réception théâtrale dans le prologue des Thesmophories,” Cahiers des études anciennes, 51, 2014, p. 45-73.
http://etudesanciennes.revues.org/789
[Emp.: p. 61- 68; A 56, B 84.]
Maury, Louis-Ferdinand, Alfred, Histoire des religions de la Grèce antique. Tome troisième. La morale. Influence des religions étrangère et de la philosophie, Paris: Librairie philosophique de Ladrange 1859.
[Emp.: p. 385-391.]
Mayaux, Catherine, “Saint-John Perse lecteur de l’Empédocle de Jean Bollack,” Les Lettres Romanes, 70, 3-4, 2016, p. 357-377.
[B 22.]
Mayo, Tyler, Edward, Research and experiment in early Greek thought, diss., University of Michigan, 2019.
[B 100.]
McCabe, Mary, Margaret, Plato and his Predecessors. The Dramatisation of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000, (The W.B. Stanford Memorial Lectures). Reprint with correction in 2006.
Mcclay, Mark F., “"You fell into milk": Symbols and narratives of kinship in bacchic mysteries,” Classical Antiquity, 42, 1, 2023, p. 121-158.
[B 112, B 115, B 117, B 129, B 146, B 147.]
McClelland, Norman C., Encyclopedia of reincarnation and karma, Jefferson-London: McFarland & Company 2010.
[P. 87: Empedocles.]
McDiarmid, John B., “Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 61, 1953, p. 85-156.
[Emp.: p. 106-109.]
McEvilley, Thomas, The shape of ancient thought: Comparative studies in Greek and Indian philosophy, New York: Allworth Press 2002.
[P. 67-71: Emp. cosmic cycle. P. 106-107: Emp. and Orphism. P. 304-307: Emp. and elements.]
McGonagill, Gary Lance, A history of allegorical interpretation from Homer through Lucretius, Thesis in classical philosophy, Harvard University (Cambridge Ma.), 2001.
[Empedocles: p. 69-78. A patchwork of several selected readings. Influenced by Kingsley.]
McIntosh Snyder, Jane, “Lucretius’ Empedoclean Sicily,” The Classical World, 65, 7, 1972, p. 217-218.
McKirahan, Richard D., Jr., Philosophy before Socrates: an introduction with texts and commentary, Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett 1994.
[Emp. p. 232-291. fragments and commentaries. [+ +].]
– “Assertion and Argument in Empedocles’ Cosmology or, what did Empedocles learn from Parmenides?,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 163-189.
[B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17.30-3).
– Philosophy before Socrates: an introduction with texts and commentary, (Second Edition), Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett 2010.
[Empedocles: p. 230-292. [+ +].]
Méautis, Georges, “Plutarque et l’orphisme,” in: Mélanges Gustave Glotz, Tome I-II, Paris: PUF 1932, p. 575-585.
[B 115.]
Meeusen, Michiel, Plutarch’s science of natural problems: a study with commentary on Quaestiones naturales, Leuven: Leuven University Press 2016, (Plutarchea hypomnemata).
Megino Rodríguez, Carlos, (2005) Orfeo y el Orfismo en la poesía de Empédocles: influencias y paralelismos, Madrid: UAM Ediciones 2005, (Colección de Estudios).
See review by J.-C. Picot: https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2007/2007.11.02
– (2005) “Aportación del papiro de Estrasburgo (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666) a la comprensión de la demonología de Empédocles,” in: Actas del XI Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, vol. 2, ed. Antonio Alvar Ezquerra, Madrid, 2005, p. 423-434.
– (2006) “La concepción empedoclea de la miseria humana: entre psicología, religión y moralidad,” in: La dignità e la miseria dell’uomo nel pensiero europeo. Atti del convegno internazionale di Madrid, 20-22 maggio 2004, ed. Guido M. Cappelli, Roma: Salerno 2006, (Studi e saggi, 40), p. 55-63.
[B 2, B3, B 4, B 5, B 11, B 15, B 110, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 124, B 129, B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.]
– (2008) “Empédocles y el orfismo,” in: Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, 2, ed. A. Bernabé & F. Casadesús, Madrid: Akal 2008, p. 1105-1140.
– (2011) “La transmigración en la poesía de Empédocles,” in: Reencarnación: La transmigración de las almas entre Oriente y Occidente, ed. A. Bernabé, M. Kahle & M. A. Santamaría Álvarez, Madrid: Abada 2011, p. 269-282.
– (2011) “El origen del hombre según Empédocles,” in: Mitos sobre el origen del hombre, ed. A. Bernabé & J. Pérez de Tudela, Madrid 2011, p. 261-294.
[B 8, B 9, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 26, B 35, B 59, B 62, B 71, B 96, B 98, B 111, B 115, B 121, B 124, B 128, B 137, B 139, B 140, B 145, B 147, Pap. Strasb.]
Mele, Alfonso, “Empedocle e Agrigento,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo, 2007, p.179-188.
Ménard, Étienne, La séparation du ciel et de la terre. Du thème mythologique aux cosmogonies présocratiques, Mémoire de Master (Dir. Dimitri El Murr), École Normale Supérieure de Paris, 2020.
Méndez Dosuna, Julián, Víctor, “El secreto de sus ojos: niñas y pupilas en Homero Ilíada 8.168 y Aristófanes, Tesmoforiantes 406,” Studia Philologica Valentina, 18, n.s. 15, 2016, p. 229-240.
[B 84.]
– “Ἀμόργινος and ἀμοργίς: the color of olive oil lees and Aristophanes, Lysistrata 150 and 735, 737,” in: Classical Philology and Linguistics: old themes and new perspectives, ed. G. K. Giannakis, et al., Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2023, (Trends in Classics – Greek and Latin Linguistics, 1), p. 369-400.
[B 84. Amorgos.]
Menn, Stephen (ed.), Simplicius. On Aristotle Physics 1–8. General introduction to the 12 volumes of translations, London-New York-Oxford: Bloomsbury Academic 2022, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle).
Meriani, Angelo, “Ἀναίσιμος: da Plutarco ad Empedocle (Emp., fr. 27 a D.- K. = Plut., mor., 777c),” in: Contributi di filologia greca, ed. I. Gallo, Naples: Arte Tipografica 1990, p. 121-125.
[B 27a.]
Merker, Anne, La vision chez Platon et Aristote, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2003, (International Plato Studies, 16).
[P. 26-30:· B 84; p. 48-49: A 92.]
Mertens-Pack³ (Cedopal), P.Strasb. inv. G 1665-1666 (= Mertens-Pack 00356.110), P.Oxy. 73.4938 (= Mertens-Pack 00356.120).
http://cipl93.philo.ulg.ac.be/Cedopal/MP3/dbsearch.aspx
Merzdorf, Reinhold, “Quaestiunculae Empedocleae,” in: Commentationes philologae, scripserunt Seminarii Philologi Regii Lipsiensis... sodales, G. Curtio dicatae, Leipzig: Giesecke und Devrient 1874, p. 41-56.
[Detailed study of the different forms of declensions and rare forms found in the verses of Empedocles, in particular in comparison with the Homeric forms.]
Messina, Gaetano, (1991) “Il lessico di Empedocle, Testo critico dei frammenti, commento alle variae lectiones e indice delle concordanze,” in: Index Empedocleus, ed. G. Imbraguglia, G. S. Badolati, R. Morchio, A. M. Battegazzore & G. Messina, Genova: Erga edizioni 1991, (Le opere e i giorni, 1), p. 81-212. Indice delle concordanze, in: Index Empedocleus, Genova 1991, II. p. 214-515.
[[+ +].]
– (2002) “Empedocle ‘rivisitato’: testo, traduzione e commento dei frammenti di Strasburgo (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665-1666),” Giornale di Metafisica, 24, 2002, p. 5-69.
[B 17, Pap. Strasb.]
– (2005) “Una nuova lettura di Empedocle 100 DK,” Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, 27, 2005, p. 777-787.
[B 100.]
– (2007) Dalla fisica di Senofane all’Empedocle di Strasburgo: studi di filosofia presocratica, Bari: Levante editori 2007, (‘Le Rane’, 48).
[P. 101-165: Empedocle ‘rivisitato’, already published in: Giornale di metafisica, 24, 2002; p. 167-176: “Una nuova lettura di Empedocle 100 DK”, which is a favourable reading of Rossetti’s article “Empedocle scienziato”, and already published in Giornale di Metafisica, Nuova Serie, 27, 2005.]
Mesturini, Anna Maria, “L’eclissi di sole in Empedocle e Lucrezio,” Studi italiani in filologia classica, 80, 1987, p. 173-180.
– “Per una nuova interpretazione del fr. 93 D.-K. di Empedocle,” Bolletino dei classici, 13, 1992, p. 107-116.
[B 73.]
Metropoulos, K., “Ιατρικα προσωκρατικων φιλοσοφων,” Platon, 15, 1963, p. 196-217.
[Emp.: p. 212-214).
Métral A., “Compte rendu de Memorie sulla vita d'Empedocle Gergentino di Domenico Scinà (1813)”, Bulletin des sciences historiques, Antiquité, Philologie, 4, 1825, p. 313-314.
Meulder, Marcel, “Empédocle FVS 31 B 115, 11 D.-K. : ἠελίου φαέθοντος ou ἠελίου ἀκάμαντος,” Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire, 94, 2016, p. 47-67.
[B 115.]
– “Le vers 4 du fragment 115 d’Empédocle (FVS 31 D.-K.): proposition d’une correction,” Elenchos, 37, 1-2, 2016, p. 33-68.
[B 115.]
Micalella, Dina, “Filosofia e linguaggio poetico: Empedocle nel giudizio di Aristotele,” in: Aevum, 92, 1, 2018, p. 17-27.
Michel, Claudia, “Blindness and Blinding in the Homeric Odyssey,” in: Gaze, Vision, and Visuality in ancient Greek literature, ed. A. Kampakoglou & A. Novokhatko, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2018, (Trends in Classics – Supplementary Volumes, 54), p. 61-87.
[B 84.]
Michelini, Ann, Norris, “The dance of the elements: fragment B 17 of Empedocles,” in: Power and spirit, ed. S. Jäkel, (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, B, 199), Turku (Finland): Turun Yliopisto 1993, p. 27-41.
[B 17, B 27.]
Mihai, Adrian, “Soul’s aitherial abode according to the Poteidaia epitaph and the Presocratic philosophers,” Numen, 57, 5, 2010, p. 553-582.
[Empedocles, p. 569-571: B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 146-147.]
– Ὁ ἐν οὐρανῷ Ἅιδης. La naissance du purgatoire dans l’Antiquité. Diss. EPHE Paris – Université de Montréal 2013.
– L’Hadès céleste. Histoire du purgatoire dans l’Antiquité, Paris: Classiques Garnier 2015, (Kaïnon - Anthropology of Ancient Thought, 1).
Mikalson, Jon D., Greek popular religion in Greek philosophy, Oxford University Press 2010.
[Empedocles: p. 69-70, B 128.]
Miller, Emmanuel (ed.), ΩΡΙΓΕΝΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΟΥΜΕΝΑ Η ΚΑΤΑ ΠΑΣΩΝ ΑΙΡΕΣΕΩΝ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ, Origenis philosophumena sive omnium haeresium refutatio. E codice Parisino, Oxford: E Typographeo Academico 1851.
Miller, Joseph Gresham, Democritus and the critical tradition, Diss. At Duke University, 2013.
Miller, Patrick Lee, Becoming God: pure reason in early Greek philosophy, London-New York: Continuum 2011.
[Several quotations through the book. Some pages dedicated to Empedocles: p. 72-74.]
Millerd (Smertenko), Clara Elizabeth, On the interpretation of Empedocles, diss., Chicago 1908 (New York 19802).
Minar, Edwin L., “Cosmic periods in the philosophy of Empedocles,” Phronesis, 8, 1963, p. 127-145.
[Reprint in Essays in ancient Greek philosophy, ed. J. P. Anton & G. L. Kustas, Albany: SUNY 1971, p. 39-58.]
– “Pre-Socratic studies, 1953-1966,” Classical World, 60.4,1966, p.143-163.
[Empedocles: p. 160.]
Minazzi, Fabio, “L’eau comme bien commun: les raisons philosophiques,” Rivista dell’Istituto di Storia dell’Europa Mediterranea (= RiMe), 16, 2, 2016, p. 227-238.
[Emp. p. 229-230.]
Minon, Sophie, “Στέργειν, στοργή : l’architecture du sens,” in: Le voyage des légendes : hommages à P. Chuvin, ed. D. Lauritzen & M. Tardieu, Paris: CNRS Éditions 2013, p. 231-254.
[B 19, B 22, B 26, B 35, B 87, B 109.]
Minz, Hubert, Anfänge des Naturrechts bei Empedokles und ein Vergleich mit dem Naturrecht des Sophisten Antiphon, Inaugural - Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Hohen Rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Köln, Bonn: G. Menden 1960.
[B 9, B 135.]
Misener, Geneva, “Loxus, Physician and Physiognomist,” Classical Philology, 18, 1, 1923, p. 1-22.
[A 97; a role of blood in Emp. theory of soul and thinking; not very informative and decisive for Emp. studies, but with interesting parallels in medicinal and philosophic speculations in 5th and 4th B. C.]
Molinari, Nicholas J., Concerning water as the archai: Acheloios, Thales, and the origin of philosophy. A dissertation providing philosophical, mythological, and archaeological responses to the neo-Marxians, diss., Salve Regina University, Newport (RI), March 2020.
[Emp.: p. 219-224, A 1, B 61, B 117, B 128, B 129, "Empedokles was schooled in the Kypris-Acheloios tradition".]
– Acheloios, Thales, and the origin of philosophy: a response to the neo-Marxians, Oxford: Archaeopress 2022.
[Emp.: p. 150-155.]
Molinari, Nicholas, J. & Nicola Sisci, ΠΟΤΑΜΙΚΟΝ: Sinews of Acheloios. A comprehensive catalog of the bronze coinage of the Man-Faced Bull, with essays on origin and identity, Oxford: Archaeopress 2016. [Emp.: p. 27-28; A 1, B 61, B 128.]
Momigliano Arnaldo, The development of Greek biography, Cambridge (Mass.)-London: Harvard University Press 1993² (19711 in the Mededelingen – 34.7 – of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie).
[A 1.57, A 1.63.]
Mondolfo, Rodolpho, “La sfera infinita in Parmenide, Empedocle e Zenone,” in: R. Mondolfo, L’infinito nel pensiero dei Greci, Firenze: Le Monnier 1934, (Studi filosofici), p. 276-284.
[Reprint with the same title in: L’infinito nel pensiero dell’antichità classica, Firenze: ‘La nuova Italia’ editrice 1956, p. 363-372. Reprint with same title in L’infinito nel pensiero dell’antichità classica, Milano: Bompiani 2012, (Il pensiero occidentale), capitolo VI, p. 363-372.]
– “[Introduzione, 3] Il confronto con Empedocle: la « coincidentia oppositorum » e il ciclo cosmico,” in: Eraclito. Testimonianze, imitazioni. Introduzione, traduzione e commento a cura di Rodolfo Mondolfo e Leonardo Tarán, Firenze: La nuova Italia 1972, (Biblioteca di studi superiori, 59), p. cxxix-cxxxix. Reprint in Eraclito. Testimonianze, imitazioni e frammenti, con i testi greci, ed. R. Mondolfo, L. Tarán, & M. Marcovich, Milan: Bompiani 2007, (Il Pensiero Occidentale), p. cxxix-cxxxix. In that book see also “Imitazioni” for Empedocles, p. 194-198 (written by R. M.).
[B 3.9-14, B 16, B 17.1-2 and 16-17, B 17.3-5, B 106, B 110.3-5, B 135.]
– Il pensiero antico. Storia della filosofia greco-romana, Firenze: ‘La Nuova Italia’ editrice 19613. (19271, 19502.)
Mongitore, Antonino, Bibliotheca sicula sive de scriptoribus siculis, Panormi 1707 (tomus I) and 1714 (tomus II), I.174-9.
[A solid biography of Emp. accompanied with plenty of references to primary sources and contemporary scholars.]
Montano, Aniello, “Empedocle”, γραμματα, rivista di cultura umanistica, Rivista-annuario dell’Istituto di Istruzione secondaria superiore ‘Francesco de Sanctis’, Sant’Angelo dei Lombardi, 2, 2000, p. 49-65.
– “Senso e ragione nella gnoseologia di Empedocle di Agrigentino,” in: Montano, A, Methodos: Aspetti dei metodi e dei processi cognitivi nella Grecia Antica, Napoli: Loffredo 2014, (σκέψις, 25), p. 25-65 (chapter 3).
Montanari, Franco, The Brill Dictionary of Ancient Greek. Editors of the English edition: Madeleine Goh & Chad Schroeder, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2015.
[English translation of Franco Montanari’s Vocabolario della Lingua Greca. Look for the abbreviation Emped.]
Montarese, Francesco, Lucretius and his sources: a study of Lucretius, De rerum natura, I 635-920, Berlin-Boston: W. De Gruyter 2012, (Sozomena, Studies in the Recovery of Ancient Texts, 12).
[A 70, B 6, B 17, B 35, B 71, B 73, B 112, B 115, B 118-126, B 133, B 146, B 147.]
Montevecchi, Federica, (2005) “Sulla complessità di Empedocle. Per un bilancio storiografico,” Hortus Musicus, VI, 21, 2005, p. 128-131.
– (2006) “Review of Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello,” Hypnos, 17, 2006, p. 139-142.
– (2007) “L’eterno movimento della physis. Alcune riflessioni su Empedocle di Agrigento,” La società degli individui, 28, 2007, p. 9-21.
– (2007) “Empedocle fra mythos e logos,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 71-82.
[B 6, B 42, B 134.]
– (2010) Empedocle d’Agrigentino, Naples: Liguori 2010.
[[+ +].]
– (2011) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qo25qX5r1o : "Empedocle: il discorso dell'antichità su amicizia e contesa." 12 November 2011.
– (2013) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1yA-jF1bi4 : "Amore e odio: Empedocle e Freud", Secondo incontro della terza edizione del corso base di formazione filosofica "Pensare la vita". 7 March 2013.
– (2017) “Amore e odio: Empedocle e Freud,” in: Il senso degli opposti, ed. F. Andolfi, Parma: Diabasis 2014
– (2017) “Empedocle e Freud. Riflessioni su logica e linguaggio,” Aretè, 2, 2017, p. 260-274.
[Aretè è una rivista scientifica internazionale ... nata nel dicembre 2015. La rivista pubblica on line articoli (inediti) in italiano, etc.]
http://arete.unimarconi.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ARETE-Volume-2-2017-completo.pdf
– (2018) Sull’ Empedocle di Giorgio Colli, Milan: Luca Sossella 2018.
[First part: about Nietzsche; second part, p. 33-63: “Sull’ Empedocle di Giorgio Colli”.]
– (2018) “Empédocle et Freud. Réflexions sur la logique et le langage. Introduit par André Laks,” Savoirs et clinique, 24, 1, 2018 p. 106-120.
– (2022) “Modi di essere uomini: Parmenide ed Empedocle. Riflessioni sulla soggettività nel mondo antico,” in Le vie dell’essere. Studi sulla ricezione antica di Parmenide, ed. E. Volpe, Baden-Baden: Academia Verlag 2022, (Supplementa Eleatica, 3), p. 45-62.
[B 112, B 115, B 117, B 123, B 126, B 146.]
Montiglio, Silvia, “Wandering philosophers in classical Greece,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 120, 2000, p. 86-105.
[B 20, B 57, B 58, B 115, B 121, B 126.]
Montuori, M., Chi sono i σοφισταί in Aristoph. Nub. vv. 332-338,” Atti della accademia di scienze morali e politiche de la sozieta nazionale di scienze, 97, 1986, p. 7-15.
Moore, Christopher, Calling philosophers names. On the origin of a discipline, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2020.
[A 1, A 68, B 112, B 129, B 132.]
Morales Troncoso, David Emilio, “La dialéctica del amor-odio en Empédocles y Schopenhauer,” Arbor: ciencia, pensamiento y cultura, 742, 2010, p. 311-319.
https://arbor.revistas.csic.es/index.php/arbor/article/view/782/790
– “El poder de la indistinción en la filosofía de Empédocles,” Limes (Santiago), 23, 2010, p. 65-78.
Morana, Cyril & Eric Oudin, Découvrir la philosophie antique, Paris: Eyrolles 2009.
[Empedocles: p. 25-27.]
Morand, Anne-France, Études sur les Hymnes Orphiques, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill 2001, (Religions in the Graeco-Roman world, 143).
[B 141.]
Morchio, Renzo, “La “fisica” di Empedocle tra cosmologie e genetica,” in: Index Empedocleus I, ed. Imbraguglia et al., Genova 1991, p. 49-68.
Moreau, Alain, “Quand Apollon devint Soleil,” in: Les astres. Actes du Colloque International de Montpellier, 23-25 mars 1995, I, ed. B. Bakhouche, A. Moreau, & J.-C. Turpin, Montpellier: Publications de la Recherche. Université Paul-Valéry 1996, p. 11-35.
[A 23, B 40.]
Moreno, Inmaculada Rodríguez, “ΔΑΙΜΟΝΕΣ, ΗΡΩΕΣ Υ ΑΓΓΕΛΟΙ en la filosofía presocrática,” Habis, 26, 1995, p. 29-46.
[Empedocles: p. 37-40. B 21, B 23, B 59, B 112, B 115, B 126, B 134.]
Morgan, Kathryn A., Myth and philosophy from the pre-Socratics to Plato, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[Emp.: p. 59-62.]
Morgan, Michael, L., “Review of Ancient philosophy, mystery, and magic- Empedocles and Pythagorean tradition by P. Kingsley,” The American Historical Review, 102, 4, 1997, p. 1129-1131.
Mori, Luca, “Empedocle alla luce della complessità,” I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro on-line, 4, 2011, p. 121-133.
http://www.qro.unisi.it/frontend/sites/default/files/Empedocle_alla_luce_della_complessit%C3%A0.pdf
[A 74, B 26, B 30, B 100.]
Moriani, Fausto, “Materia comune e generazione degli elementi in Aristotele,” Elenchos, 9, 1988, p. 329-351.
[On the beginning of De gen. et corr. Aristotle criticized Emp. conception of 4 elements.]
Morley, John, “Empedocles and Diderot,” Fortnightly Review, 1, 1875, p. 786.
Moriss, S. P., Daidalos and the origins of Greek art, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1992.
[P. 221. B 62.]
Morozov, Alexey, “Le dossier de Simon de Samarie dans la Réfutation de toutes les hérésies du Pseudo-Hippolyte,” Revue des études tardo-antiques, Collection Pierre-Louis Malosse 1, 2020, p. 3-220.
[B 6, B 109.]
Morrison, J. S., “Parmenides and Er,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 75, 1955, p. 59-68.
– “Passages from Aristophanes and Euripides,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, New Series, 16 (196), 1970, p. 83-90.
[Storm of the elements.]
Mortley, Raoul J., The bond of the cosmos: A significant metaphor (Tim. 31c ff.),” Hermes, 97, 1969, p. 372-373.
[B 17.]
Moscarelli, Enrico, Senofane ed Empedocle. Testimonianze e frammenti. Un confronto tra l’antica e l’attuale cosmologia. Saggi introduttivi e testo greco delle opere con traduzione a fronte, Pistoia: Petite Plaisance 2022, (Il giogo, 144).
[Moscarelli follows the Greek edition by C. Gallavotti. [+ +].]
Moser, Marianne, “Ovide lecteur d’Empédocle : pour une réinterprétation du fr. 6 DK,” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé [BAGD], 1, 2017, p. 80-96.
[B6.]
Mosheim, Johann, Lorenz, (von), (trans.), Radulphi Cudworthi systema intellectuale hujus universi seu de veris naturae rerum originibus commentarii ... accedunt reliqua ejus opuscula. Ioannes Laurentius Moshemius […] Omnia ex Anglico Latine vertit, recensuit, variisque observationibus et dissertationibus illustravit et auxit, Lugduni Batavorum 1773², Tomus I-II, I.22-7 et passim. That second edition is poshumous (Mosheim died in 1755). First edition with the same title in 1733, different numbering of pages.
[The second edition is interesting for B 115.13, anticipating the edition by Karsten in 1838.]
Most, Glenn, Warren, “The poetics of early Greek philosophy,” in: The Cambridge Companion to early Greek philosophy, ed. A. A. Long, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999, p. 332-362.
– “The stillbirth of a tragedy: Nietzsche and Empedocles,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 31-44.
– “ἄλλος δ’ ἐξ ἄλλου δέχεται. Presocratic philosophy and traditional Greek epic,” in: Literatur und Religion, 1,1, Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, ed. A. Bierl, R. Lämmle & K. Wesselmann, Berlin-New York: W. De Gruyter 2007, (MythosEikonPoiesis, 1/1), p. 271–302.
[B 115.]
Most, Glenn, W. (ed.), Studies on the Derveni papyrus, volume II, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2022.
[Daimones, Aphrodite.]
Motta, Anna, “Demiurgy in heavens. An ancient account in Plato’s Statesman,” in: Plato’s Statesman revisited, ed. B. Bossi López & T. T. Robinson, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2018, (Trends in Classics, Supplementary Volumes, 68), p. 141-156.
[Emp.: p. 153-154. B 17, B 128, B 130.]
Motte, André, Prairies et jardins de la Grèce antique : de la religion à la philosophie, Brussels: Palais des Académies 1973.
[B 17, B 21, B 27, B 35, B 66, B 98, B 112, B 134, B 146.]
– “Aspects du prophétisme grec,” in: Prophéties et oracles, II, en Égypte et en Grèce, Supplément Cahiers Évangile n° 89, Paris: Éd. du Cerf 1994, p. 41-78.
[B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 128, B 129 B 131, B 132, B 146, B 147.]
– “Les philosophes préclassiques. Ἀπορία, εὐπορία et les mots étymologiquement apparentés,” in : Aporia dans la philosophie grecque, des origines à Aristote. Travaux du Centre d’études aristotéliciennes de l’Université de Liège, ed. André Motte & Christian Rutten (ed.), Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters 2001, (Aristote, traductions et études), p. 13-35.
[B 3, B 100, B 137.]
– “Les philosophes préclassiques,” in: Philosophie de la forme, eidos, idea, morphè dans la philosophie grecque des origines à Aristote, ed. A. Motte, Chr. Rutten & P. Somville, Louvain-la-neuve-Paris-Dudley (Ma): Peeters 2003, (Aristote, traductions et études), p. 19-63.
[Emp.: p. 30-36, 52-63. B 21, B 22, B 23, B 35, B 71, B 73, B 98, B 115, B 125, B 137.]
Mourelatos, Alexander P. D., (1970) The Route of Parmenides, Yale University Press 1970.
– (1971) “Empedocles of Acragas,” in: Dictionary of Scientific Biography, IV, ed. C. C. Gillispie, New York: Scribner 1971, p. 367-369.
– (ed.) (1974) The Pre-Socratics: a collection of critical essays, Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday/Anchor Press 1974, (Modern studies in philosophy). Revised edition in Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1993.
[In the “Editor’s introduction”, see Emp. p. 15-17. Farther, two contributions about Empedocles: one by A. A. Long, the other one by C. H. Kahn.]
– (1981) “Pre-Socratic origins of the principle that there are no origins from nothing,” Journal of Philosophy, 78, 11, 1981, p. 649-665.
[Mainly § 4 is devoted to Emp., p. 658-664: B 11, B 12, B 17.30-3.]
– “Η ἀνακάλυψη τῆς Μορφῆς στὴν πρώιμη ἑλληνικὴ φιλοσοφία”, in Παλίμψηστον [Palimpsiston], 5, 1987, p. 93-114.
[The discovery of form in early Greek philosophy.]
– (1987) “Quality, structure, and emergence in later Pre-Socratic philosophy,” Proceedings of the Boston area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 2, 1987, p. 127-194.
[Par. 4, p. 138-143: B 96, B 71, B 23; par. 8-12, p. 163-93: A 78, A 86-87-89-92, A 94, B 8, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 31, B 33, B 34, B 76, B 87, B 89, B 91, B 96, B 98.]
– (1989) “Review of Rethinking early Greek philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics by C. Osborne, 1987,” Ancient Philosophy, 9, 1, 1989, p.111-117.
– (2006) “The concept of the universal in some later Pre-Platonic cosmologists,” in: A Companion to Ancient philosophy, ed. M. L Gill & P. Pellegrin, Malden-Oxford-Victoria: Blackwell Publishing 2006, (Blackwell companions to philosophy), p. 56-76.
[Section about Empedocles: p. 64-65. Title: Empedocles: Formulae for compounds; biological forms; type-identities across cycles.]
– (2014) “Review of Mansfeld J. & Primavesi O., Die Vorsokratiker, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 2011,” Classical Journal-Online, 06.08, 2014, p. 1-5.
http://cj.camws.org/sites/default/files/reviews/2014.06.09 Mourelatos on Mansfield and Primavesi.pdf
– (2022) After Parmenides. Studies on language and metaphysics in early Greek philosophy, Baden-Baden: Academia 2022, (Supplementa Eleatica, 2).
[“Presocratic origins of the principle that there are no origins from nothing”: p. 21-35; “Form as shape, array, order: earliest approaches and eleatic scruples”: p. 49-78; “Quality, structure, emergence: in Anaxagoras, Philolaus, Democritus, and in Empedocles”: p. 79-126; “The concept of the universal in some later pre-platonic cosmologists”: p. 127-145.]
Moutsopoulos, Évanghélos, “Le modèle empédocléen de pureté élémentaire et ses fonctions,” in: La cultura filosofica della Magna Grecia, Mesina: G. B. M 1989. Reprint in: Giornale di metafisica, 21, 1999, p. 127-132.
– Philosophie de la culture grecque, Athens: Académie d’Athènes 1998. Spanish translation: Filosofia de la cultura griega. Traducción de Carlos A. Salguero-Talavera, Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza 2004, (Humanidades, 49).
– “To what extent are Empedocles’ elements pure?,” Diotima, 43, 2015, p. 131-133.
Mpozónés, Geórgios A., Ατοπα της φιλοσοφίας του Εμπεδοκλέους, 1974 (???).
Mras, Karl (ed.), et al., Eusebius Werke, 8, Die Praeparatio evangelica. Teil 1, Einleitung, die Bücher I bis X, bearbeitete Auflage herausgegeben von É. des Places, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1982², (Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten Jahrhunderte, 43.1). First edition: 1954. Reprint of 1982²: W. de Gruyter 2012.
[Emp. in Book I and Book V: p. 31 for A 30; p. 230 for fr. 115.9-12.]
– Eusebius Werke, 8, Die Praeparatio evangelica. Teil 2, Einleitung, die Bücher XI bis XV, Register, bearbeitete Auflage herausgegeben von É. des Places, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1983², (Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten Jahrhunderte, 43.2). First edition: 1956. Reprint of 1983²: W. de Gruyter 2012.
[Emp. in Books XIII-XV: p. 296 for B 6; p. 208 for μεταβολή des Alls ins Feuer with Clem. Alex. Strom. V, 14, 103.6; p. 401 for A 56; p. 403 for A 60 and A 53; p. 404 for A 54; p. 407 for A 47, p. 409 for A 49, p. 411 for A 35 and A 58 and A 50; p. 412 for A 51; p. 417 for A 61, p. 420 for A 66 or B 55; p. 421 for A 30.]
Muccioli, Federicomaria, “Diventare un dio a Selinunte? Empedocle e la bonifica/purificazione della città,” in: La città inquieta: Selinunte tra lex sacra Defixiones, ed. A. Iannucci, F. Muccioli & M. Zaccarini, Milan: Mimesis 2015, p. 261-284.
Mudry, Philippe, “D’Empédocle à Galien (et Averroes ?). La parole qui guérit,” in: Von der Antike begeistert! Philologie, Philosophie, Religion und Politik durch drei Jahrtausende. Festschrift für Christoph Riedweg, ed. C. Semenzato & L. Hartmann, Basel: Schwabe Verlag 2023, p. 59-66.
[B 112.]
Mueller, Ian, “(review of) Hippolytus Retractatus: a discussion of Catherine Osborne, Rethinking early Greek philosophy,” Oxford studies in ancient philosophy, VII, 1989, p. 233-251.
[B 115.]
– “Heterodoxy and doxography in Hippolytus’ ‘Refutation of All Heresies’,” in: Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (ANRW), II: Principat, 36.6, (Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik. Philosophie [Doxographica (Forts.)]), ed. W. Haase, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter 1992, p. 4309-4374.
[Emp.: p. 4341-4347.
Mugler, Charles, (1951) “Sur quelques fragments d’Empédocle,” Revue de Philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes, 25, 1951, p. 33-65.
[B 84, B 17.3-5, B 85, A 92, B 22.]
– (1953) Deux thèmes de la cosmologie grecque : devenir cyclique et pluralité des mondes, Paris: Klincksieck 1953, (Études et commentaires, XVII).
[Emp.: p. 30-58, 139.]
– (1960) “La lumière et la vision dans la poésie grecque,” Revue des études grecques, 73, 344-346, 1960, p. 40-72.
[B 84.]
– (1961) “Pluralisme matériel et pluralisme dynamique dans la physique grecque d’Anaximandre à Épicure,” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes, 35, 1961, p. 67-86.
– Les Origines de la science grecque chez Homère : l’homme et l’univers physique, Paris: C. Klincksieck 1963, (Études et Commentaires, 46).
[P. 141 : B 84.]
– (1967) “Le Vide des atomistes et les pores d’Empédocle : à propos d’un passage d’Aristote,” Revue de philologie, 3, 41, 1967, p. 217-224.
[A 87, B 84.]
– (1968) “Kosmologische Formeln,” Hermes, 96, 4, 1968, p. 515-526.
[P. 525-6: in B 26.5 it is necessary to read εἰς ἓν ἅπαντα from B 17.7 instead of εἰς ἕνα κόσμον.]
Mühl, Max, “Über die Missgeschöpfe bei Empedokles,” Rheinisches Museum, 114, 1971, p. 289-296.
[B 57.]
Mullach, Friedrich, Wilhelm, August, Disputatio de Empedoclis Proemio (Germaniae philologos Berolinum congressos Societatis Gymnasiorum Berolinensium sodales salvere iubent, interprete Frid. Guil. Augusto Mullachio), typis A. G. Schadii, Berolini 1850.
[Reprinted in 1860, I.xiii-xxvi.]
– “Quaestionum Empedoclearum specimen secundum,” in: Programme d’invitation à l’examen public du Collège Royal Français, fixé au 30 Septembre 1853, Berlin: J. F. Starcke 1853, p. 3-32.
[Reprinted mostly in 1860, I.1-80.]
– Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum, collegit recensuit vertit annotationibus et prolegomenis illustravit indicibus instruxit, Fr. Guil. Aug. Mullachius. Poeseos philosophicae caeterorumque ante Socratem philosophorum quae supersunt, Paris: A. F. Didot 1860.
[Emp.: I.xii-xxvii and 1-80. Several reprints. [+ +]]
Müller, Carl Werner, Gleiches zu Gleichem. Ein Prinzip frühgriechischen Denkens, diss., Bonn, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz 1965, (Klassisch - Philologische Studien, 31).
[Emp.: p. 26-64.]
Müller, Dietram, Handwerk und Sprache: Die sprachlichen Bilder aus dem Bereich des Handwerks in der griechischen Literatur bis 400 v. Chr., Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain 1974, (Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, 51).
[B 33, B 34, B 73, B 96.]
Munding, Heinz, “Zur Beweisführung des Empedokles,” Hermes, 82.2, 1954, p. 129-44.
– “Naturwissenschaftliches aus Altsprachlicher Sicht,” Der Altsprachliche Unterricht, 27, 5, 1984, p. 69-77.
[B 17.2.]
Muñoz Valle, Isidoro, “Le problème des homoeoméries dans le système d’Anaxagore,” L’Antiquité Classique, 45, 2, 1976, p. 587-592.
[On Aristotle’s conception of Anaxagoras’ homoemeries and Empedocles’ roots; A 46.]
Mureddu, Patrizia, “La “incomunicabilità” gorgiana in una parodia di Aristofane? Nota a Thesm. 5-21,” Lexis, 9-10, 1992, p. 115-120.
[Thesm. 5-21 allegedly alludes to Gorgias and Emp., A 49, A 90, B 70, B 84, B 117.]
Murphy, James, Bernard, “Greek philosophy as a religious quest for the divine,” Forum Philosophicum, 28, 1, 2023, p. 85-97.
[The author relies on KRS. Four states of matter. A 1, B 6, B 17, B 111, B 112, B 129.]
– Deification in classical Greek philosophy and the Bible, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024.
[The author relies on KRS. B 115. Daimōn: p. 93.]
Musti, Domenico, “Pitagorismo, storiografia e politica tra Magna Grecia e Sicilia,” in: Tra Sicilia e Magna Grecia. Aspetti di interazione culturale nel IV secolo a. C, Atti del convegno, Napoli 19–20 marzo 1987, ed. A. C. Cassio & D. Musti, Pisa, 1989, (AION filol., 11), p. 13-56.
[Emp.: p. 44-51.]
– Magna Grecia: il quadro storico, Roma-Bari: Gius, Laterza & Figli 2005, (Storia e società).
[Emp.: p. 179-183.]
Mutschmann, H[ermann?], “Über Parmenides B 1 Diels und Empedokles B 137.3,” Zeitschrift für Gymnasialwissenschaft, 66, 1912, p. 800.
Naddaf, Gerard, “Allegory and the origins of philosophy,” in: Logos and muthos: Philosophical essays in Greek literature, ed. W. Wians, Albany (NY): State University of New York Press 2009, (SUNY series in ancient Greek philosophy), p. 99-131.
Nagy, Albino, “Di alcuni scritti attribuiti ad Empedocle,” Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, 10, 1901.
[P. 307-320 and 325-347. Emp. in Arabian and Hebrew literature and philosophy; outdated by de Smet, 1999.]
Nagy, Gregory, “Hymnic elements in Empedocles (B 35 DK = 201 Bollack),” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 24, 1, 2006, p. 51-62.
[B 35.]
Naiden F.S., Smoke Signals for the Gods: Ancient Greek Sacrifice from the Archaic through Roman Periods, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press 2013.
[Empedocles: p. 281-282; B 128.]
Νάτσου, Μάρια (Natsou, Maria), Άνθρωπος και κόσμος, γνώση και πλάνη στη σκέψη του Εμπεδοκλή, Diss. Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών (ΕΚΠΑ), 2017.
(B 1, B 2, B 3, B 6, B 9, B 11, B 15, B 17, B 24, B 84, B 100, B 111, B 112, B 114, B 146, B 147.)
Nauck, August, Euripideische Studien I-II, St. Petersbourg : Eggers et comp. - Samuel Schmidt (Riga) - Leopold Voss (Leipzig) 1859, 1862, I.32-3, n. 1.
[B 67.1-2: some textual suggestions.]
Nelis, Damien, Patrick, (1992) “Demodocus and the song of Orpheus,” Museum Helveticum, 49, 3, 1992, p. 157-158.
– (2000) “Apollonius Rhodius and the traditions of Latin epic poetry,” in: Apollonius Rhodius, ed. M.A. Harder, R.F. Regtuit & G.C. Walker, Leuven: Peeters 2000, (Hellenistica Groningana, 4), p. 85-105.
– (2001) Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, Leeds: Francis Cairns Publications 2001.
[Emp.: p. 96-112; Love and Strife; p. 98-111, 346-355.]
– (2004) “Georgics 2.458-542, Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles,” Dictynna, 1, 2004, p. 1-21.
http://dictynna.revues.org/161
[B 128.]
– (2009) “Ovid, Metamorphoses 1.416-51: noua monstra and the foedera naturae,” in: Paradox and the marvellous in Augustan literature and culture, ed. Philip R. Hardie, Oxford University Press 2009, p. 248-267 (Chap. 13).
[Empedocles and Apollonius Rh. p. 254-256.]
– (2014) “Empedoclean epic: how far can you go?,” Dictynna, 11, 2014 (online).
http://dictynna.revues.org/1057
[B 128, B 131. Comparison with Apollonius Rhodius.]
– (2018) “Une certaine idée de la tradition épique, d’Empédocle à Lucain,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 247-262.
[B 128, B 131.]
Nélod, Gilles, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Brussels: Office de Publicité 1959.
[19612; a popular work. See review by Bollack.]
Nestle, Wilhelm, “Der Dualismus des Empedokles,” Philologus, 65, 1906, p. 545-557.
– “Bemerkungen zu den Vorsokratikern und Sophisten,” Philologus, 67, 1908, p. 531-584.
[Emp.: p. 538-543. B 4, B 5, B 17, B 77-78, B 106, B 108, B 121, B 125, B 126, B 129, B 137.]
– Die Vorsokratiker in Auswahl übersetz und herausgegeben, Iena: E. Diederichs 1908.
[P. 41-45,135-151, p. 243. Ed. 1922: p. 42-46; p. 138-155, p. 263.]
Nethercut, Jason, Scott, Provisional poetics in Lucretius’ De rerum natura, diss., The University of Pennsylvania, Department of Classical Studies, 2012.
[P. 44-63: Chapter 1.3 Lucretian radices and Empedocles’ ῥιζώματα ; p. 104-106: Chapter 2.3.2.1: Empedocles.]
– Empedocles' "roots" in Lucretius’ De rerum natura,” American Journal of Philology, 138, 1, 2017, p. 85-105.
– Ennius Noster: Lucretius and the Annales, New York: Oxford University Press 2021.
Newmyer, Stephen, Thomas, Animals in Greek and Roman thought: a sourcebook, London-New York: Routledge 2011, (Routledge Sourcebooks for the Ancient World).
[Emp. p. 100-101, B 115, B 139.]
– Plutarch’s three treatises on animals. A translation with introductions and commentary, London-New York: Routledge 2021, (Routledge classical translations).
Nicolai, Walter, “Der Mythos vom Sündenfall der Seele (bei Empedokles und Platon),” Gymnasium, 88, 1981, p. 512-524.
[B 115.]
Nietzsche, Friedrich, Nietzsche. La naissance de la philosophie à l’époque de la tragédie grecque, traduit par Geneviève Bianquis, Paris: Gallimard 1938, (Collection Philosophie). Several reprints. Reprint in Collection Idées, 196, (in 1969) with a different numbering of pages.
[B 134.]
– The Pre-Platonic Philosophers, translated from the German and edited, with an introduction and commentary, by Greg Whitlock, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press 2006.
[Emp.: p. 106-119.]
– Friedrich Nietzsche. Les philosophes préplatoniciens. Texte établi à partir des manuscrits, présenté par Paolo d’Iorio & Francesco Fronterotta, texte traduit de l’allemand par Nathalie Ferrand, Combas: Édition de l’éclat 1994.
[Emp.:.p. 110.]
Nilüfer Akçay, K., Porphyry’s On the Cave of the Nymphs in its intellectual context, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2019, (Studies in platonism, neoplatonism, and the Platonic tradition, 23).
[B 115, B 120, B 128, B 130, B 136.]
Nilles, J. Cl., “Le fragment 8 d’Empédocle selon la perspective de Plutarque et d’Aristote,” Mnemosyne, 42, 1989, p. 365-379.
[B 8.]
Ní Mheallaigh, Karen, The Moon in the Greek and Roman imagination: myth, literature, science and philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020, (Greek culture in the Roman world).
[B 45, B 84.]
Nonvel Pieri, Stefania, “Empedocle: una struttura di duplicità,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 157-178.
Norden, Eduard, Agnostos Theos. Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede, Leipzig 1913.
[P. 100, 130-133 and 198.
– Die antike Kuntstprosa, I, Leipzig-Berlin 19153.
[P. 15-19.
– Ennius und Vergilius. Kriegsbilder aus Rom grosser Zeit, Leipzig-Berlin: Teubner 1915.
[P. 10-18. chap: “Ennius Empedocleus”.]
– P. Vergilius Maro. Aeneis, Buch VI, B. G. Teubner 1976. Reprinted by de Gruyter 1995.
[B 115.]
Notopoulos, James, A, “The symbolism of the sun and light in the Republic of Plato. I,” Classical Philology, 39, 3, 1944, p. 163-172.
[P. 170-171: Empedocles; A 56, B 132, sun as a reflection; moon and reflection of light.]
Novokhatko, Anna, “‘You must not stand in one place’: seeing in Sicilian and Old Attic Comedy,” in: A. Kampakoglou & A. Novokhatko (ed.), Gaze, vision, and visuality in ancient Greek literature, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2018, p. 205-232.
[P. 222-223: B 84.]
– Greek comedy and embodied scholarly discourse, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2023.
[B 8, B 9, B 105, B 133.]
Nucci, Matteo, “L’Empedocle di Strasburgo. La questione delle tre Theta,” Elenchos, 26, 2, 2005, p. 379-401.
– “Chaos e kosmos nel “nuovo” Empedocle,” Chaos e Kosmos, VI, 2005, p. 1-14.
http://www.chaosekosmos.it/pdf/2005_02.pdf
– “La morte dell'Amicizia in Empedocle,” in: Amicizia e concordia, ed. Spinelli, E., Roma 2006, p. 45-74.
Nünlist, René, Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung, Stuttgart-Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1998, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 101).
– “Poetological Imagery in Empedocles,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 73-92.
Nussbaum, Martha, “Commentary on Mourelatos’s 'Quality, structure, and emergence in later pre-Socratic philosophy',” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Volume II, 1987, p. 195-207.
Nutton, Vivian, Ancient medicine, London-New York: Routledge 2004.
Nuzzo, Enrico, “Le figure metaforiche nel linguaggio dei Presocratici,” Studi Filosofici, 38, 2015, p. 9-37.
Obbink, Dirk, (1988) “Hermarchus, Against Empedocles,” The Classical Quarterly, 38, 2, 1988, p. 428-435.
– (1993) “The Addressees of Empedocles,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici, 31, 1993, p. 51-98.
[B 112.]
– (1994) “A Quotation of the Derveni Papyrus in Philodemus’ On piety,” Bollettino del centro internazionale per lo studio dei papyri ercolanesi, 24, 1994, p. 111-135.
[P. 119-121: A 334.]
– (2001) “The Genre of Plataea: generic unity in the new Simonides,” in: The new Simonides. Contexts of praise and desire, ed. D. Boedekker & D. Sider, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press 2001, p. 65-85.
[B 1, B 3, B 4, B 35, B 131.]
Obbink, Dirk & Gonis N. (ed.), The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. LXXIII. Edited with translations and notes in honour of Peter Parsons and John Rea, London: Publ, for the British Academy by the Egypt Exploration Soc. 2009.
[See: 4938 (1. Hälfte 2. Jh.) Empedokles, Φυσικά, ed. D. Obbink, p. 41-44. B 88.]
Obenga, Théophile, L’Égypte, la Grèce et l’école d’Alexandrie : Histoire interculturelle dans l’antiquité aux sources égyptiennes de la philosophie grecque, Paris: L’Harmattan 2005.
[B 6.]
Obeyesekere Gananath, Imagining Karma: ethical transformation in Amerindian, Buddhist, and Greek rebirth, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press, 2002.
[Ethicization and Soteriology in Empedocles: p. 214-232; B 29, B 62, B 113, B 115, B 119, B 127, B 128, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 146, B 147.]
O’Brien, Denis, (1965) “Empedocles fr. 35.14-15,” The Classical Review, 15, 1965, p. 1-4.
[B 35.]
– (1967) “Empedocles’ cosmic cycle,” Th Classical Quarterly, 17, 1967, p. 29-40.
– (1968) “The relation of Anaxagoras and Empedocles,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 88, 1968, p. 93-113.
[A 6.]
– (1968) “Derived light and eclipses in the fifth century,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 88, 1968, p. 114-127.
[A 30, A 60, A 61.]
– (1969) Empedocles’ cosmic cycle: A reconstruction from the fragments and secondary sources, Cambridge: University Press 1969. Reprint in 2009.
[Main A and B: A 30, A 58, A 70, A 72, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 26, B 26a, B 27, B 27a, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 62, B 71, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 109, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 128, B 129, B 115, B 147.]
– (1970) “The effect of a simile: Empedocles’ theories of seeing and breathing,” Journal of Hellenic Studies, 90, 1970, p. 140-179.
[B 84, B 100.]
– (1972) “Review of G. Zuntz, Persephone,” The Times Literary Supplement, 25 August 1972, p. 992.
– (1977) “Review of H. Lambridis, Empedocles,” The Times Literary Supplement, 8 April 1977, p. 439.
– (1980) “Temps et intemporalité chez Parménide,” Les Études philosophiques, 3, 1980, p. 257-272.
[P. 268-269: Empédocle, B 17.32.]
– (1981) Theories of weight in the ancient world. Four essays on Democritus, Plato and Aristotle. A study in the development of ideas. Volume I: Democritus. Weight and size. An exercise in the reconstruction of early Greek philosophy, Paris-Leiden: Les Belles Lettres / E. J. Brill 1981, (Philosophia Antiqua, 37).
[B 21, B 26a, B 27, B 28, B 30.]
– (1981) Pour interpréter Empédocle, Paris: Les Belles Lettres - Leiden: E. J. Brill 1981, (Collection d’études anciennes), (Philosophia Antiqua, 38).
[B 2, B 6, B 17, B 26, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 62, B 112, B 113, B 114, B 115, B 122.]
– (1982) “Review of Lynne Ballew: Straight and circular, a study of imagery in Greek philosophy,” Les études philosophiques, 1982, p. 354-356.
– (1982) “Review of C. Gallavotti, Empedocle, poema fisico e lustrale,” Gnomon, 54, 1982, p. 225-234.
[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 7, B 9, B 10, B 12, B 13, B 16, B 17, B 131.]
– (1984) Theories of weight in the ancient world. Four essays on Democritus, Plato and Aristotle. A study in the development of ideas. Volume II: Plato. Weight and sensation, Paris-Leiden: Les Belles Lettres / E. J. Brill 1984, (Philosophia Antiqua, 41).
[B 8, B 9, B 38.]
– (1987) Études sur Parménide, I, Le poème de Parménide, texte, traduction, essai critique par D. O’B. en collaboration avec Jean Frère pour la traduction française, Paris: J. Vrin 1987, (Bibliothèque d’histoire de la philosophie).
[B 3, B 112, B 115.]
– (1991) “Comment écrire l’histoire de la philosophie ? Héraclite et Empédocle sur l’un et le multiple,” Rue Descartes, Collège international de philosophie, 1-2, 1991, p. 121-138.
– (1995) “Empedocles revisited,” Ancient Philosophy, 15, 1995, p. 403-470.
[B 1, B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 26a, B 27, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 53, B 59, B 62, B 75, B 84, B 85, B 96, B 98, B 103, B 104, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 127, B 129, B 139, B 146, B 147, B 153a.]
– (1996) “Empédocle,” in: Le savoir grec, Dictionnaire critique, ed. J. Brunschwig, G.E.R. Lloyd, Paris: Flammarion 1996, p. 632-645.
– (1997) “L’Empédocle de Platon,” Revue des Études Grecques, 110, 1997, p. 381-398.
[B 35, B 62.]
– (1998) “Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient philosophy, mystery, and magic,” Isis, 89, 1998, p. 122-124.
– (1999) “Plato and Empedocles on evil,” in: Traditions of Platonism. Essays in honour of John Dillon, ed. J. J. Cleary, Aldershot (Hampshire)-Brookfield (Vt.): Ashgate 1999, p. 3-27.
[B 35, B 84, B 100.]
– (2000) “Hermann Diels on the Presocratics: Empedocles’ double destruction of the cosmos (Aetius II 4.8),” Phronesis, 45, 2000, p. 1-18.
[A 521.]
– (2001) “Empedocles: The wandering daimon and the two poems,” Aevum antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 79-179.
[B 115.]
– (2002) “Die Aristophanes-Rede im Symposion: der Empedokleische Hintergrund und seine philosophische Bedeutung,” in: Platon als Mythologe. Neue Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen, ed. M. Janka & C. Schäfer, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 2002, p. 176-193. Reprint in the book Platon als Mythologe. Interpretationen zu den Mythen in Platons Dialogen, 2. Auflage, in 2014, p. 265-282.
– (2003) “Space and Movement: Two Anomalies in the text of the Timaeus,” in: Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel ‘Timeo’, ed. C. Natali & S. Maso, Amsterdam 2003, p. 121-148.
[On presence of Emp. In Plato’s Timaeus.]
– (2005) “Empedocles: A Synopsis,” in: Frühgriechisches Denken, ed. Georg Rechenauer, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2005, p. 316-342.
[B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26a, B 27, B 30, B 35, B 62, B 96, B 115, B 117, B 137, B 147.]
– (2005) “Empédocle: Vie et après-vie,” Humanities - Christianity and Culture, 36, 2005, p. 1-18.
– (2005) “Apologia pro vita sua,” in: Agonistes - Essays in honour of Denis O'Brien, ed. J. Dillon, M. Dixsaut, Aldershot: Ashgate 2005, p. IX-LVI. Reprint in London-New York: Routledge 2017.
– (2005) “Le Parménide historique et le Parménide de Platon,” in: Plato’s Parmenides: Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, ed. Aleš Havlíček & Filip Karfík, Prague: OIKOUMENH 2005, p. 234-256.
[Reprint in Platon, ed. Dixsaut M. et al., Paris: Ellipses 2013, p. 89-106, (Collection Lectures de...). Empedocles: p. 244-250 in 2005, p. 97-102 in 2013; τὸ πᾶν; B 13, B 17.32. In 2005, there is a “Réponse à Denis O’Brien”, p. 257-262.]
– (2006) “Life beyond the stars: Aristotle, Plato and Empedocles,” in: Common to body and soul, philosophical approaches to explaining living behaviour in Greco-Roman antiquity, ed. R.A.H. King, Berlin-New York: W. de Gruyter 2006, p. 49-102.
[B 17, B 21, B 22, B 35, B 96, B 98, B 115.]
– (2007) “Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s ‘Symposium’: The Empedoclean background and its philosophical significance,” in: Plato’s Symposium. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, 12. - 15. October, 2005, ed. Aleš Havlíček & Martin Cajthaml, Prague: OIKOUMENH 2007, p. 59-85.
[A 72, B 17, B 20, B 62, The Strasbourg Papyrus, ens. a, d.].]
– (2007) “'Immortel' et 'Impérissable' dans le Phédon de Platon,” The international journal of the platonic tradition, I, 2007, p.109-262.
[Emp.: p. 207-211; B 35.14.]
– (2009) “Review of Annette Rosenfeld-Löffler: La poétique d’Empédocle. Cosmologie et métaphore. Thèse de doctorat présentée à la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Lausanne,” Gnomon, 81, 2, 2009, p. 97-107.
– (2010) “Μονίηι in Empedocles: Slings' "iron rule",” Mnemosyne, 63, 2, 2010, p. 268-271.
[B 27, B 28.]
– (2011) “'Themselves alone': Empedocles’ description of the elements,” in: λόγον διδόναι. La filosofia come esercizio del render ragione. Studi in onore di Giovanni Casertano, ed. Lidia Palumbo, Napoli: Loffredo 2011, p. 221-232.
[B 17, B 21, B 26, B 96.]
– (2012) “Empedocles’ "mountain path" (Fr. 24),” Elenchos, 33, 2, 2012, p. 301-333.
[B 24.]
– (2012) “Le Parménide historique et le Parménide de Platon,” in: Platon, ed. A. Castel-Bouchouchi, M. Dixsaut & G. Kévorkian, Paris: Ellipses 2012 (reimpr. 2013), (Lectures de...), p. 89-106.
[Emp.: p. 97-104; B 13, B 17.]
– (2016) “Empedocles on the identity of the elements,” Elenchos, 37, 1-2, 2016, p. 5-32.
– (2017) “Empedocles’ mountain path (Fr. 24): the perils of a metaphor,” Elenchos, 38, 1-2, 2017, p. 1-22.
[B 24.]
O’Brien, Denis & Marwan Rashed, “Empédocle, fragment 32 Diels,” Revue des études grecques, 114, 2, 2001, p. 349-358.
[B 32.]
O’Brien, Joan V., The transformation of Hera: a study of ritual, hero, and the goddess in the Iliad, Lanham (Maryland): Rowman & Littlefield 1993.
[B 6.]
Oehler, R., Friedrich Nietzsche und die Vorsokratiker, Leipzig 1904, p. 89-98.
Ogle, M. B., “Laurel in ancient religion and folk-lore,” American Journal of Philology, 31, 1910, p. 287-311.
[P. 297-298: B 140.]
O’Keefe, M. D., The search for control. A study of the origins of the thought of Empedocles and Heraclitus, diss., Michigan State University, East Lansing 1969.
Olerud, Anders, L’idée de macrocosmos et de microcosmos dans le Timée de Platon, Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri 1951.
[P. 43-44: chap. II.1.1: Le dieu cosmique de Platon et le Sphairos d’Empédocle. P. 77-87 : chap. II.2: La doctrine des quatre éléments chez Platon et Empédocle. P. 209 : chap. III.12: La doctrine grecque du pneuma et de l’éther. Le Sphairos d’Empédocle. B 6, B 17, B 23, B 29, B 96, B 115.]
Olney, James, The rhizome and the flower: The Perennial Philosophy, Yeats and Jung, Berkeley-Los Angeles -London: University of California Press 2020.
O’Meara, Dominic, “Empédocle fragment 143 : Un nouveau témoignage chez Jean Italos,” REG, 123, 2, 2010, p. 877-879.
[B 143.]
O’Meara, Dominic & John Dillon, Syrianus. On Aristotle Metaphysics 3-4, London: Duckworth 2008. Paperback Bloomsbury 2014.
[B 30.]
O’Neill, Agnes, Thomas Aquinas, Sister, The Pre-Socratic use of ψυχή as a term for the principle of motion, diss., Washington D. C: National Capital Press 1915.
[Emp.: p. 36-38.]
Onians, Richard Broxton, The origins of European thought, Cambridge 1991 (19511).
[P. 25-30 (B 5: φρήν : p. 28 n.6), 51-52, 194 (B 111.9: μένος), p. 54, 71 (B 105), p. 141 (B 134), p. 202-203 (B 6.3), p. 341 (B 17.15).]
Oostenbroek, Lucette Marguérite, “Empedokles,” in: L. M. Oostenbroek, Eris - Discordia: Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der ennianischen Zwietracht, diss., Leiden, Pijnacker: Dutch efficiency bureau, 1977.
[P. 26-48. Die Entwicklung der Lehre von den vier Elementen, Der Einfluss des Pythagoreismus, Die mythographische Tradition.]
Opsopaus, John, Ancient Greek esoteric doctrine of the elements, 1998-1999 (based on a series of articles published in Circle Network News, Issues 68-71).
http://opsopaus.com/OM/BA/AGEDE/index.html
[General mystical meditations on four elements and Empedocles, strongly dependent on P. Kingsley. B 6.]
– Pythagorean theology and the esoteric elements, Pythagorean Pentagram Press 2023.
[B 6.]
Orosio, P., “Brief review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Helmántica, 33, 1982, p. 170.
O’Rourke, Donncha, “Lovers in arms: Empedoclean Love and Strife in Lucretius and the Elegists,” Dictynna, 11, 2014, p. 1-21.
https://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/1080
http://dictynna.revues.org/1080
Osborne, Catherine (see also Rowett), (1987) “Empedocles Recycled,” The Classical Quarterly, 37, 1, 1987, p. 24-50.
– (1987) Rethinking early Greek philosophy. Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics, London: Duckworth 1987.
– (1990) “Boundaries in nature: eating with animals in the fifth century B.C.,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 37, 1990, p. 15-29.
– (1994) “Review of The Poem of Empedocles by B. Inwood, 1992,” The Philosophical Review, 103, 3, 1994, p. 565-567.
– (1998) “Was Verse the Default Form for Presocratic Philosophy?,” in: Form and content in didactic poetry, ed. Catherine Atherton, Bari: Levante Editori 1998, (Nottingham Classical Literature Studies, 5, 1997), p. 23-35.
– (1999) “Empedocles Scholarship,” Times Literary Supplement, June 4, 1999, p. 17.
– (2000) “Rummaging in the recycling bins of Upper Egypt: A discussion of A. Martin and O. Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 18, 2000, p. 329-356.
– Presocratic philosophy: A very short introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004, (Very short Introductions, 103).
– (2005) “Sin and moral responsibility in Empedocles’s cosmic cycle,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 283-308.
– (2007) “Empedocles,” in: C. Osborne, Dumb beasts and dead philosophers: humanity and the humane in ancient philosophy and literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007, p. 50-54.
[In Chapter 3: On the transmigration of souls: Reincarnation into animal bodies in Pythagoras, Empedocles, and Plato. B 115, B 117, B 127, B 128, B 137, B 139, d5-6 MP.]
– (2009) Philoponus. On Aristotle Physics 1.4-9, translated by Catherine Osborne, London: Gerald Duckworth 2009, (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle). Reprint in London-New York: Bloomsbury 2014.
[B 6, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 31, a(i)8-a(ii)7.]
Osborne, H., “Colour concepts of the ancient Greeks,” British Journal of Aesthetics, 8.3, p. 269-283.
Osek, Ewa, “The Orphic Diet,” Líttera antíqua, 10-11, 2015, p. 25-200.
http://www.litant.eu/LA%202015%20nr%2010.pdf
[More than an article. It includes a vast collection of Greek and Latin texts with English translations. 20 pages of bibliography. Useful. Osek follows M.R. Wright’s numbering. A 1, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 128, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 141, R 47 LM.]
Ouvrard, Florence, Les poètes philosophes présocratiques et l’épopée homérique : Quelques aspects de leur pensée religieuse et morale, Diss., Université Paris Sorbonne - UFR de Grec, 2010.
[P. 103-146 : Partie III: L’Épique chez Empédocle (à partir du fr. 17 DK et du papyrus de Strasbourg a(i) et a (ii)).]
Owens, Joseph, “Aristotle on Empedocles Fr. 8,” in: Essays on Plato and the Pre-Socratics (= Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. 2), ed. R. A. Shiner & J. King-Farlow, Edmonton (Alberta): Humanities Centre of the University of Alberta 1976, p. 87-100.
[B 8.]
Padel, Ruth, In and out of the mind: Greek images of the tragic self, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1992.
[P. 41-42: B 3; p. 42-43: B 105; p. 43: B 98; p. 60: B 84; p. 89: B 100.]
Padró, Joseph, “Deux possibles mentions des quatre éléments dans la littérature égyptienne classique,” Faventia, 2, 2, 1980, p. 5-17.
[B 6 and 4 elements in the ancient Egypt.]
Palmer, John, Anderson, (2009) Parmenides and Presocratic philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
[Empedocles’ element theory and Parmenides: p. 260-312. B 2, B 3, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 62, B 96, B 100, B 112, B 129, B 133, B 134, a(i), a(ii), b, c, d, e, f.]
– (2013) “Revelation and reasoning in Kalliopeia’s address to Empedocles,” Rhizomata, 2013, 1, 2, p. 308-329.
[Kalliopeia is addressing Empedocles in B 2, B 23, B 111. Is Empedocles already a god or not? Sure, he will be a god, when he died. Empedocles will re-present, as his generic models Hesiod and Parmenides re-presented before him, the revelation he initially received from a divine source. B 2, B 3, B 4, B 17, B 23, B 112, B 111, B 115, B 131, B 146.]
– (2016) “Elemental change in Empedocles,” Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 30-54.
[B 2, B 3, B 11, B 17, B 21, B 129.]
– (2018) “Presocratic interest in the soul’s persistence after death,” in: Philosophy of mind in Antiquity, ed. J. Sisko, New York: Routledge 2018, (The history of the philosophy of mind, Volume 1), p. 23-43. With other location and date: Abingdon-New York: Routledge 2019.
[B 6, B 8, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 105, B 107, B 117, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 146, B 128, d5-6 MP.]
– (2020) “Ethics and natural philosophy in Empedocles,” in: Early Greek ethics, ed. D. C. Wolfsdorf, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020, p. 54-73.
[B 1, B 8, B 15, B 21, B 30, B 59, B 115, B 117, B 128, B 129, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 146.]
Palumbo, Lidia, “Empedocle e il linguaggio poetico,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 83-107.
[B2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 20, B 23, B 99, B111, B 129, B 132.]
– “Poesia e política in Empedocle di Agrigento,” in: Il pensiero politico meridionale, Atti del Convegno di studi “Il pensiero político meridionale” Avellino 1-2 dicembre 2006, ed. Giuliano Minichiello e Clementina Gily, Avellino: Elio Sellino Editore (Edizioni del Centro Dorso) 2008, p. 131-146.
Palumbo, Lidia & Lucio Pepe, “Le parole, i dipinti e il mondo in un frammento empedocleo e in un passo platonico,” Atti della Accademia di Scienze Morali e Politiche della Società Nazionale di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti di Napoli [= AAN], 124, p. 155-167.
[B 23.]
Panagiotou, S., “Empedocles on his own Divinity,” Mnemosyne, 36, 1983, p. 276-285.
Pancamo, E., Empedocle e Pirandello. La continuità dello spirito classico nella terra Agrigentina. Discorso, Agrigento-Dima: Liceo classico Empedocle 1955.
[An inaugural discourse starting academical year of Lyceum ‘Empedocle’ in Agrigento).
Panchenko, Dmitry, V., (Д. В. ПАНЧЕНКО), “КОМУ И В ЧЕМ ПОДРАЖАЛ ЭМПЕДОКЛ (D. L. VIII, 56)?,” Philologia classica, 9, 2014, p. 142-149.
– “Empedocles’ emulation of Anaxagoras and Pythagoras (D.L. 8. 56),” Apeiron, 51, 4, 2018.
Panou, Evangelia., Kalachanis, Konstantinos, et al., “On the unity of the elements of nature in Empedocles,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Bulgaria, 1, 2015, p. 48-55.
http://astro.shu-bg.net/pasb/index_files/Papers/2015/Empedocles.pdf
[B 6.]
Panzerbieter, Friedrich, “Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Empedokles,” in: Einladungs-Programm des Gymnasium Bernhardinum in Meiningen, Meiningen 1844, p. 1-35.
– “Zu Empedokles,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 3, 1845, nr 111 col. 883-887 and nr 112 col. 889-893.
Paolucci, P., “Zoogonia lucreziana: Una versione scientifica, De rerum natura 5, 783-825,” in: Lingue tecniche del greco e del latino 2, Atti del Ii seminario internazionale sulla letteratura scientifica e tecnica greca e latina, Trieste, 4-5 ottobre 1993, ed. S. Sconocchia & L. Toneatto, Bologna: Pàtron 1997, p. 93-103.
Papabasileiou, G. A., “Κριτικαι παρατηρήσεις εις Πλουτάρχου Τα Ηθικά,” Αθηνα, 10, 1898, p. 167-242. [A 72.]
Paquet Léonce & Yvon Lafrance, Les Présocratiques [1450-1879] III, Québec: Bellarmin 1995.
Park, David, The fire within the eye: a historical essay on the nature and meaning of light, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1997.
[P. 6, 35, 49, 345-347. B 6, B 84.]
Parker, Robert, Miasma, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1983.
[B 140.]
– “Early orphism,” in: The Greek world, ed. A. Powell, London-New York: Routledge, 1995, p. 498-499.
[B 115.]
Parry, Richard, “Empedocles,” in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2012.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/empedocles/
Pascal, Carlo, “L’imitazione di Empedocle nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio,” in: Rendiconti della accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli, Napoli: Tipografia della R. Università 1902, p. 59-85. Napoli: Stab. Tip. nella R. Università di A. Tessitore e Figlio, 1902.
[Reprint in: C. Pascal, Graecia Capta, Florence, Le Monnier 1905, p. 129-151. Facsimile Publisher, Delhi 110052, India, distributed by Gyan Books. B 22, B 35, B 38, B 73, B 124, B 128, B 129, B 130, B 136, B 137.]
Passa, Enzo, “Empedocles in the West, Panyassis, in the East: Doric and hexameter poetry in the classical age,” in: The paths of Greek: Literature, linguistics and epigraphy, ed. Enzo Passa & Olga Tribulato, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2019, (Trends in Classics, Supplementary Volumes, 85), p. 107-123.
[B 17, B 20.]
Patočka, Jan, Předsokratovská filosofie, (skriptum FF), Praha 1968, p. 126-143.
[The Presocratic philosophy.]
Paton, W. R., M. Pohlenz, & W. Sieveking (ed.), Plutarchi Moralia, Vol. III, Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1929. Reprint in: Munich-Leipzig: K. G. Saur 2001 (Bibliotheca scriptorum graecorum et romanorum Teubneriana).
[De exilio. B 115.]
Pearson, Alfred Chilton, “Review of the first edition of FVS,” The Classical Review, 23, 1909, p. 48-50.
Peithmann, Ernst Christian Heinrich, Empedocles, Bitterfeld-Leipzig: F. E. Baumann 1901, (Biographia antica, II, 3).
– “Die Naturphilosophie vor Sokrates,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 15, 2, IX, 1902, p. 214-263 and 15, 3, XII, 1902, p. 308-342.
[Empedocles: p. 231-245. General and little substantial outline of basic theses of E. Physics with regard to Parmenides’ philosophy; worthless.]
Peixoto, Miriam Campolina Diniz, “Review of Livio Rossetti e Carlo Santaniello, Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle,” Síntese, Revista de filosofia, 32, 102, 2005, p. 131-135.
http://www.faje.edu.br/periodicos2/index.php/Sintese/article/view/515/1158
Pelikan, Christina, Empedokles, Leben, Lehre und Rezeption durch Hölderlin, Universität Koblenz-Landau, 2008-2009/ Magister Philosophie und Germanistik.
http://www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/koblenz/fb2/ik/institut/philosophie/lehrende/meyer/pelikan.pdf
Pellati, Francesco, “La dottrina degli elementi nella fisica di Vitruvio,” Rinascimento, 2, 1951, p. 241-59 [Possible influence of Emp. theory of 4 roots on Vitruvius.]
Pellegrin, Pierre, Aristote. Physique. Traduction, présentation, notes, bibliographie et index par P. P., Paris: GF Flammarion 2000, (GF, 887).
Pellegrin, Pierre & Catherine Dalimier, Aristote. Traité du ciel. Traduction et notes par C. D. et P. P., introduction de P. P., Paris: GF Flammarion 2004, (édition bilingue GF, 1036).
Pellò, Caterina, “The lives of Pythagoras: A proposal for reading Pythagorean metempsychosis,” Rhizomata, 6, 2, 2018, p. 135-156.
[Emp.: B 115, B 129, p. 148-152.]
Pender, Elizabeth.E., “'Perforated right through' - why Plato borrows Empedocles’ klepsydra,” Leeds International Classical Studies, 11.2, 2013.
http://lics.leeds.ac.uk/2013/201302.pdf
[B 8, B 9, B 23, B 26, B 33, B 34, B 35, B 38, B 52, B 62, B 71, B 84, B 87, B 90, B 96, B 100, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 129, B 146.]
Pépin, Jean, “Mythe et allégorie : les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes,” Paris: Études augustiniennes 1976.
[A 33, B 6: p. 344 n.178; p. 406, n.64.]
– “L’initié et le philosophe,” in: La pureté. Quête d’absolu au péril de l’humain, ed. S. Matton, Paris: Éditions Autrement, 1993, (série Morales, 13), p. 105-130.
[B 143.]
Pepple, John, “A lost fragment of Empedocles,” Journal of Value Inquiry, 18, 1996, p. 169-186.
Peppmüller, Rudolf Heinrich (ed), Kleine philologische Schriften von Theodor Bergk, II, zur griechischen Literatur, Halle 1886, (Opuscula philologica Bergkiana, 2).
[Emp.: p. 3-66.]
Petrikas, Adomas, Religinė perspektyva nesuvokiamoje Empedoklio filosofijos vienovėje ir skirtybėje, Diss., Vilnius 2024.
Perale, Marco, Adespota Papyracea Hexametra Graeca (APHex I): Hexameters of unknown or uncertain authorship from Graeco-Roman Egypt. 1, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2020, (Sozomena, 18).
[Emp.: p. 49-50 B 146, B 6; p. 56 B 35; p. 58 B 100; p. 70 B 27, B 59; p. 79 B 100; p. 80 B 35; p. 89 B 100; p. 99 B 27; p. 104 B 17; p. 131 B 111; p. 150 B 35; p. 188 B 77-78; p. 279 B 112 ; p. 92 with Apollonius R. 1.496-498.]
Perceau, Sylvie & Gabrièle Wersinger Taylor, “Phono-rythmie dans l’hymne des racines (Empédocle, F. 6),” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 103, 3, 2019, p. 247-266.
[B 6.]
– “Épistémologies et théologies : quand l’hexamètre dactylique oriente les listes divines (des Néréides d’Homère aux dieux racines d’Empédocle, quelques exemples),” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 24, 1, 2022, p. 97-127.
[B 1, B 6, B 17, B 23, B 35, B 66, B 112, B 122, B 123, B 128, B 143, B 151.]
Pereira, Ivanete, (2003) “Considerações sobre Empédocles e a orden órfico-pitagórica,” Hypnos, 11, 2, 2003, p. 98-111.
– (2006) Aspectos sagrados do mito e do lógos: poesia hesiódica e filosofia de Empédocles, São Paulo: EDUC (PUC-SP Editora) 2006.
[Mestrado em Filosofia - PUC-SP, 2003.]
– (2017) “Sobre a (id)entidade divina das raízes empedocleanas no fragmento Dk 31 B 6,” Filosofia Antiga, 17, 2017, p. 385-399.
[B 6.]
– (2019) Ριζώματα: Raízes na cosmologia de Empédocles, diss., Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 25 October 2019.
[A 33, A 70, B 6, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 23, B 62, B 77-78, B 79, B 111, B 117, B 127, a[ii].]
– (2022) “Sobre o estatuto das formas de vida no legado de Empédocles, ou, sobre o amor,” Perspectiva Filosófica, 49, 2, 2022, p. 298-317.
[B 21, B 23, B 35, B 71.]
– (2022) “Contra a violência sacrificial: o fragmento DK 31 B 128 de Empédocles no contexto do Sobre a abstinência de Porfírio,” Anãnsi, 2, 1, 2022, p. 83-105.
[B 6, B 17, B 98, B 115, B 121, B 122, B 128, B 136, B 137.]
https://revistas.uneb.br/index.php/anansi/article/view/14853/10018
Perilli, Lorenzo, “Empedocle, Platone ed il clinamen epicureo,” Museum criticum, 25-8, 1990-3, p. 281-289.
[B 35.]
– La teoria del vortice nel pensiero antico: dalle origini a Lucretio, Pisa: Pacini 1996, p. 55-64.
[B 35, B 115.]
– “Empedocle,” in: La Filosofia antica: Itinerario storico e testuale, ed. Lorenzo Perilli & Daniela P. Taormina, Torino: Utet Università 2012, p. 129-138.
Périllié, Jean-Luc, “La métaphore du sentier (atrapos) chez Aristophane et Empédocle. Le ridicule d’un profanateur de la philosophie,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 27, 2, 2009, p. 63-97. Reprint in Météôrosophistai. Contribution à l’étude des Nuées d’Aristophane, ed. Noël M.-P. & Chr. Cusset, Cahiers du théâtre antique, 1, (Cahiers du GITA nouvelle série 19), 2015.
[B 112, B 129.]
Peris, Merlin, “The divided meadows of Aphrodite: Empedocles’ fragments 63-67,” The Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities, 4, 1 & 2, 1978, p. 50-63.
[Publisher: University of Peradeniya; A 81, B 63, B 64, B 65, B 66, B 67. See: http://dlib.pdn.ac.lk and
http://dlib.pdn.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2535]
– “Prolegomena to the study of the ancient Greek teachings of reincarnation,” The Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities, 13, 1987, p. 1-58.
[B 115, B 126
– Of death and rebirth: the ancient Greek doctrines of reincarnation (from Orpheus to Plato), Colombo: S. Godage & Brothers 2018.
[Emp.: p. 311-362. Nearly all the fragments of the Purifications are included in the commentary.]
Perrot, M., “Empédocle,” in: Dictionnaire des philosophes, 1, ed. D. Huisman, Paris: PUF1984, p. 841-846.
Pessanha, José Américo Motta, “Empédocles e a democracia, diss. Rio de Janeiro, 1965,” Kleos, 7-8, 2003-2004, p. 109-182.
http://www.pragma.ifcs.ufrj.br/uploads/K7-Empedocles.pdf
Pesenti, Giovanni, B., “Un epigramma attribuito ad Empedocle e la versione di F. Filelfo,” Athenaeum, 2, 1914, p. 325-329.
[B 161.]
– “Ancora dell’epigramma ps.-Empedocleo,” Athenaeum, 4, 1916, p. 339-340.
[B 161.]
Petersen, Christian, “Review of Ch. A. Brandis, Handbuch der Geschichte der Griechisch-Römischen Philosophie, 1835,” Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung, 1837, II (Mai bis August), 97 (June), col. 161-168.
Petit, G., “Sur la conception ancienne – anatomique, physiologique et psychique – du muscle diaphragme,” Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris, VII, 3, 1922, p. 48-54.
[Might be useful for B 23, B 110, B 129, B 132, B 133, B 134, though not mentioned in this article.]
Petraki, Zacharoula, The poetics of philosophical language: Plato, Poets and Presocratics in the ''Republic", Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2011.
[B 23.]
Pettazzoni, Raffaele, La religione nella Grecia antica fino ad Alessandro, Bologna: Nicola. Zanichelli 1921.
[Empedocles: p. 192-194.]
Petrovic, Andrej & Petrovic, Ivana, “Empedocles on inner pollution and purity: release from suffering, prayer, and mental exercise,” in: Inner purity and pollution in Greek religion - Volume I: Early Greek religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016, p. 78-100.
[B 3, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 136, B 137, B 144, B 145, B 146, B 147.]
Petrucci, Federico Maria, Teone di Smirne. Expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platonem utilium. Introduzione, traduzione, commento, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2012.
[B 143.]
Peyron, Amadeo Vittorio, Empedoclis et Parmenidis fragmenta ex codice Taurinensis Bibliothecae restituta et illustrata ab A. P. Simul agitur de genuino Graeco textu Commentarii Simplicii in Aristotelem De coelo et mundo, Leipzig: I. A. G. Weigel 1810.
[Emp.: p. 27-55.]
Pfannmüller, Gustav, Tod, Jenseits und Unsterblichkeit in der Religion, Literatur und Philosophie der Griechen und Römer, Munich-Basel: E. Reinhardt Verlag 1953.
[Pages 171-172: some interesting remarks on daimon: everybody is originally a daimon but in consequence of a pollution becomes a soul which is not composed of 4 roots and mixed with a body. P. 184-188: translation of E. fragments and testimonies concerning soul and underworld. B 115.]
Pfligersdorffer, Georg, “Studien zu Poseidonios,” Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, 232, 5, 1959, p. 100-131.
[= G. P., Itinera Salisburgensia: gesammelte Aufsätze zur Antike und ihrem Nachwirken, ed. von M. Glusl, Salzburg: Abakus 1999. B 27, B 28, B 35.3-4 etc.]
– “Ovidius Empedocleus. Zu Ovids Ianus-Deutung,” Grazer Beiträge, 1, 1973, p. 177-209.
[= G. P., Itinera Salisburgensia: gesammelte Aufsätze zur Antike und ihrem Nachwirken, ed. von M. Glusl, Salzburg: Abakus 1999. The cosmogony in Fast. I.89-144 is allegedly Empedoclean one.]
Philip, James, A., Pythagoras and early Pythagoreanism, Toronto: University of Toronto Press1966, (Phoenix Supplementary Volumes, 7).
[4 elements. Soul. Transmigration. B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 129, B 137, B 141, B 146, B 147.]
Piano, Valeria, Il Papiro di Derveni. tra religione e filosofia, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki 2016, (Studi e testi per il corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, 18).
[P. 159-160, 284-286, B 6, B 59, B 115, B 120, B 134.]
Piatek, J., Nietzsches Empedokles-Fragmente, Progr. Gymn. Stryj 1910.
Piazzi, Lisa, “I motivi dell’ammirazione per Empedocle,” in: L. Piazzi, Lucrezio e i Presocratici: un commento a De rerum natura 1, 635-920, Pisa: Scuola normale superiore 2005, (Testi e commenti, 1), p. 42-46.
– “La conferma dell’integrazione tra etica e fisica nell’« Empedocle di Strasburgo »,” in: L. Piazzi, Lucrezio e i Presocratici : un commento a De rerum natura 1, 635-920, Pisa: Scuola normale superiore 2005. (Testi e commenti, 1), p. 49-52.
– “Atomismo e polemica filosofica: Lucrezio e i Presocratici,” in: Lucrezio. La natura e la scienza, ed. M. Beretta & Fr. Citti, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki 2008, (Biblioteca di «Nuncius», 66), p. 11-25.
[Section 5: I motivi dell’ammirazione per Empedocle: p. 22-25.]
Picot, Jean-Claude, (1995) “À propos du: The Poem of Empedocles, de B. Inwood,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 13, 1, 1995, p. 81-104.
– (1998) “Sur un emprunt d’Empédocle au “Bouclier” hésiodique,” Revue des études grecques, 111, 1, 1998, p. 42-60.
[B 99, A 93, B 29.1, B 134.2.]
– (2000) “L’Empédocle magique de P. Kingsley,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 18, 1, 2000, p. 25-86.
[B 6, B 149, B 148, B 19, B 128.1-3.]
– (2004) “Les cinq sources dont parle Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 117, 2, 2004, p. 393-446.
[B 143, B 138, B 62.3, B 89, B 110.2, B 24, B 35.1, B 99, B 4.2, B 21.2, B 71; corrigenda in: REG, 118, 1, 2005, p. 322-325. See the article with the corrections:
http://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/les-cinq-sources-dont-parle-empedocle
– (2006) “Aristote, Poétique 1457 b 13-14 : la métaphore d’espèce à espèce,” Revue des études grecques, 119, 2, 2006, p. 532-551.
[B 138, B 143.]
– (2007) “Review of Carlos Megino Rodríguez, Orfeo y el orfismo en la poesía de Empédocles: influencias y paralelismos. Colección de Estudios, 98. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM Ediciones), 2005,” on line: Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2007.11.02.
https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2007/2007.11.02
– (2007) “Empedocles, fragment 115.3: Can one of the Blessed pollute his limbs with blood?,” in: Reading ancient texts. Volume I: Presocratics and Plato - Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, ed. Suzanne Stern-Gillet & Kevin Corrigan, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2007, (Brill’s studies in intellectual history, 161), p. 41-56.
[B 115.]
– (2008) “La brillance de Nestis (Empédocle, fr. 96),” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 36, 1, 2008, p. 75-100.
[B 96, B6, B 111.]
– (2008) “Empédocle pouvait-il faire de la lune le séjour des Bienheureux ?,” Organon (Warszawa), 37(40), 2008, p. 9-37.
http://www.ihnpan.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/1picot.pdf
[B 115 De exilio, B 146, B 147.]
– (2009) “Water and bronze in the hands of Empedocles’ Muse,” Organon (Warszawa), 41, 2009, p. 59-84.
http://www.ihnpan.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/8_picot-1.pdf
[B 100, B 143.]
– (2012) “Les dieux du fr. 128 et le mythe des races,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 75, 3, 2012, p. 339-356.
[B 128, B 115.]
– (2012) “Sagesse face à Parole de Zeus : une nouvelle lecture du fr. 123.3 DK d’Empédocle,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 30, 1, 2012, p. 23-57.
[B 122, B 123, B 128.]
– (2012) “Apollon et la φρὴν ἱερὴ καὶ ἀθέσφατος (Empédocle, fr. 134 DK),” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 11, 2012, p. 1-31.
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/587/562
[B 6, B 29, B 47, B 84, B 133, B 134.]
– (2013) “L’image du πνιγεύς dans les Nuées. Un Empédocle au charbon,” in: Comédie et Philosophie : Socrate et les "Présocratiques" dans les Nuées d’Aristophane, ed. A. Laks & R. Saetta Cottone, Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm 2013, p. 113-129.
[B 6, B 115, B 120, B 121.]
– (2014) “Un nom énigmatique de l’air chez Empédocle (fr. 21.4 DK),” Les Études philosophiques, 110, 3, 2014, p. 343-373. Résumé & Abstract: p. 457-458.
[B 6, B 21, B 84, B 149.]
– (2017-8) “Penser le Bien et le Mal avec Empédocle,” χώρα • REAM, 15-16, 2017/2018, p. 381-414.
[B 4, B 6, B 19, B 23, B 27, B 38, B 56, B 62, B 84, B 96, B 109, B 115, B 122, B 127, B 128, B 132, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 146, B 147.]
– (2022) Empédocle. Sur le chemin des dieux, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2022, (Anagôgê, 15).
https://www.lesbelleslettres.com/livre/9782251452579/empedocle-sur-le-chemin-des-dieux
[A 1, A 2, A 18, A 23, A 30, A 33, A 36, A 37, A 39, A 40, A 43, A 47, A 49, A 50, A 51, A 53, A 54, A 56, A 57, A 60, A 69a, A 70, A 72, A 86, A 93, A 98, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 11, B 15, B 17, B 19, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 29, B 34, B 35, B 38, B 59, B 62, B 71, B 73, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 99, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 115, B 117, B 122, B 123, B 126, B 127, B 128, B 129, B 131, B 132, B 134, B 136, B 137, B 142, B 143, B 146, B 147, B 148, B 149.]
– (2022) “Κότος, le dieu de la rancune chez Empédocle (fr. 21 et 121 DK),” Revue des études grecques, 135, 1, 2022, p. 21-41.
[B 6, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 109, B 121, B 122, B 128.]
– (2023) “L’hymne à l’Amour d’Empédocle sur fond de violence épique (Homère et Apollonios de Rhodes), Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 2, 2023, p. 76-105.
[A 50, B 6, B 17.]
– “Index,” in: Empedocles in Sicily, ed. J. Elbert Decker et al., Siracusa (Sicily)-Dakota Dunes (SD): Parnassos Press & Fonte Aretusa 2024, p. 327-336.
[The index was only published in 2025, in the digital version via JSTOR.]
Picot, Jean-Claude & William Berg, (2012) “Along a mountain path with Empedocles,” Elenchos, 33, 1, 2012, p. 5-20.
[B 24.]
– (2013) “Empedocles vs. Xenophanes: differing notions of the divine,” Organon (Warszawa), 45, 2013, p. 5-19.
http://www.ihnpan.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/1_picot-berg.pdf
[B 3, B 6, B 27, B 84, B 98, B 134.]
– (2014) “Cleombrotus cites Empedocles in Plutarch’s De defectu: a question of method in interpreting fr. 24 DK,” Elenchos, 35, 1, 2014, p. 127-148.
[B 24.]
– (2015) “Lions and promoi: final phase of exile for Empedocles’ daimones,” Phronesis, 60, 4, 2015, p. 380-409.
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/Home
[B 115, B 127, B 146, B 147.]
– (2018) “Apollo, Eros, and Epic Allusions in Empedocles, frr. 134 and 29 DK,” American Journal of Philology, 139, 3 (whole number 555), 2018, p. 365-396.
[B 29, B 56, B 132, 134.]
Pigeaud, Jackie, “La greffe du monstre,” Revue des études latines, 66, 1988, p. 197-218.
[B 20, B 23, B 57, B 61.]
Piergiacomi, Enrico, “Chi respira e odora secondo Empedocle? Sul πάντα del fr. 96.1 Gallavotti,” in: Archai, 23, 2018, p. 135-166.
[B 21, B 100, B 102, B 103, B 107, B 110, B 135.]
Pierrard, Aline, “Versification formulaire, intertextualité et évocation poétique : éléments matrices de la poésie didactique de Lucrèce,” Latomus, 61, 3, 2002, p. 589-607.
Pierris, Apostolos L. (ed.), The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005.
– “ΟΜΟΙΟΝ ΟΜΟΙῼ and ΔΙΝΗ: Nature and function of Love and Strife in the Empedoclean system,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 189-224.
[B 91, B 22, B 17.18-20, B 35.3-5, Pap. Strasb. aII.10-9, B 21.9-14, B 134.]
– “Reconstruction of Empedocles’ Poem,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. i-xcvi (Appendix).
[[+ +].]
– The emergence of reason from the spirit of mystery, Volume II: Mystery and philosophy, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2007.
[Emp.: p. 155-158, 173, 203-204. B 6: Hera = earth.]
Пименова, А.А. (Pimenova, Alexandra, A), Учение Эмпедокла о возникновении живых существ, Diss. for the degree in philology, Saint Petersburg 2016.
[L’enseignement d’Empédocle sur l’origine des êtres vivants.]
– “Истоки Эмбриологии: Эмпедокл о бесплодии мулов,” Историко-биологические исследования (= Studies in the history of biology), 14, 4, 2022., p. 46-57.
[Empedocles on the infertility of mules. A 82, A 89, B 3, B 91.]
– “Empedocles on the inheritance of parental traits by offspring,” Philologia Classica, 17, 2, 2022, p. 226-234.
[A 81.]
Piperno, Daniel, “Empédocle d’Agrigente (Ve siècle av. J.-C.) : les prémices de la pneumologie ?,” in: La Revue du praticien, 46, 19, 1996, p. 2281-2284.
Pitt, Rafael, César, Elementos órficos na poesia de Empédocles, Diss. Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Faculdade de Ciências e Letra, Araraquara, SP 2022.
[A Coleção Archai da Cátedra UNESCO Archai sobre as Origens do Pensamento Ocidental: No Annablume; 2023ª edição (5 janeiro 2023).]
Pizzagalli, Angelo Maria, “Il filosofo di Agrigente,” Atene e Roma, 20, 1917, p. 155-160.
[Superficial summary of Emp. teaching plus eulogies of E. Bignone’s study 1916.]
Pizarro Herrmann, Álvaro, “The use of εἶδος and ἰδέα in the presocratic philosophy,” Ágora, 22, 2020, p. 29‐46.
[B 22, B 23, B 35, B 62, B 71, B 73, B 98, B 115, B 125.]
Platnauer M., “Greek colour-perception,” Classical Quarterly, 15, 1921, p. 153-162.
Platt, Arthur, “Notes on Empedocles,” The Journal of Philology, 24, 1896, p. 246-247.
[Mostly redundant emendations B 9.3, B 21.13-4, B 100.8 a 25, B 112.9, B 125 and B 128.]
Plutarque, Œuvres de Plutarque, tome quatorzième. Œuvres morales de Plutarque, traduites du grec par Amyot. Nouvelle édition, revue, corrigée et augmentée, par E. Clavier, Tome second, Paris : Imprimerie de Cussac 1802.
[Étienne Clavier. B 115 : p. 334, 350, 457.]
Pokorný, Jindřich, Empedoklés z Akragantu. O podstatě světa. Očistná píseň, Praha: Supraphon 1944 [Empedocles of Acragas. On the substance of the world. The purgative song - General sketch of Emp. teaching plus the poetic translation of fragments and several testimonies.]
Pohlenz, Max, “Nomos und Physis,” Hermes, 81, 1953, p. 418-438, p. 426.
[B 9.5.]
Polansky, Ronald, Aristotle’s De anima, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
– Aristotle’s Parva naturalia. Text, translation, and commentary, Walter de Gruyter 2024.
Polito, Roberto, “Asclepiades of Bithynia and Heraclides Ponticus: medical Platonism?,” in: Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the first century BC: New directions for philosophy, ed. M. Schofield, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, p. 118-138.
[A1.61: On the woman whose breathing had stopped, A 43: On the smallest things.]
Polyak, Stephen, Lucian, (edited by Heinrich Klüver), The vertebrate visual system, its origin, structure, and function […] preceded by a historical review of investigations of the eye […], Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press 1957.
[B 84.]
Ponce, Emma, “Empédocle dans la palinodie du Phèdre,” Les Études philosophiques, 194, 4, 2019, p. 623-661. Résumé & Abstract: p. 667-668.
[B 3, B 29, B 112, B 115, B 120, B 134.]
– “Review of Jean-Claude Picot, Empédocle. Sur le chemin des dieux,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 41, 1, 2023, p. 139-184.
[B 6, B 29, B 99, B 115, B 122, B 134, B 143.]
– “L’œil étincelant de l’amour : une nouvelle lecture du fr. 84 d’Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 136, 2, 2023, p. 205-240.
[B 84, B 96, fr. 100. Primavesi’s new edition of B 84 revisited.]
– Sauver le sensible : Platon critique d’Empédocle, Diss. Sorbonne Université, Paris 2024.
Popa, Tiberiu, “Elements and their forms: the fortunes of a Presocratic idea,” in: Brill’s Companion to the reception of Presocratic natural philosophy in later classical thought, ed. C.H Harry & J. Habash, Leiden: Brill 2021, (Brill’s Companions to Philosophy, 6), p. 323-351.
[A 33, A 37, B 6.]
Pötscher, Walter, “Die Bedeutung des Wortes ΓΛΑΥΚϹΠΙΣ,” Philologus, 141.1, 1997, p. 3-20.
[B 42.]
Portale, Elisa Chiara, “Le nymphai e l’acqua in Sicilia: contesti rituali e morfologia dei votivi,” in: Cultura e religione delle acque, ed. A. Calderone, Roma: Giorgio Bretschneider 2012, p 169-191, plus Tav. XVI-XIX.
[P. 186-187: B 6.]
Porter, James, I., The origins of aesthetic thought in ancient Greece: matter, sensation, and experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
[Emp.: mainly p. 152-164. A 86, A 94, B 3, B 21, B 23, B 35, B 39, B 62, B 71, B 84, B 96.]
– The sublime in Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016.
[Emp.: a section p. 416-421. B 6, B 17, B 35, B 78, B 100, B 122, B 123, B 133, B 134.]
– “Love, Strife, and the roots of all things,” Representations, 169, 1, 2025, p. 11-27.
Pozzoni, Ivan, “L'aristocrazia moderata di Empedocle d'Agrigento,” Per la filosofia, filosofia e insegnamento, 24, 84, 1, 2012, p. 53-70.
– “L’ontologia civica di Empedocle d’Agrigento,” Información Filosófica, 9, 18, 2012, p. 18-44.
Powell, John Undershell, “The simile of the clepsydra in Empedocles,” The Classical Quarterly, 17, 1923, p. 172-174.
[B 100.]
Pradeau, Jean-François, Plutarque. Manger de la chair, introduction, présentation et notes par J.-F. Pradeau, Paris: PUF 2024.
[B 115, B 126, B 137, B 154.]
Praechter, Karl, Die Philosophie des Altertums, I, Friedrich Ueberwegs Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, Berlin: E. S. Mittler und Sohn 1926. [Emp.: p. 91-97].
Pralon, Didier, “Review of D. O’Brien, Pour interpréter Empédocle, 1981,” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes, 62, 1, 1988, p. 139-142.
Préaux, Claire, La lune dans la pensée grecque, Brussels: Palais des académies 1970.
[Pages 50-52, 173-175, 183, 186-187. A 30, A 59, A 60, A, 61, A 62, B 42, B 43, B 45, B 46, B 62, B 65, B 67, B 100, B 109.]
Préaux, Jean-G., “Un fragment retrouvé du De rerum natura de Varron,” in: Hommages à Jean Bayet, ed. M. Renard & R. Schilling, Brussels: Latomus 1964, (Collection Latomus, 70), p. 587-598.
[B 109.]
Preston, David., “Empedocles’ big break - Pre-Socratic cosmology and the big bounce,” Sapiens ubique civis, 1, 2020, p. 11-28.
Preus, Anthony, Historical dictionary of ancient Greek philosophy, Lanham-Toronto-Plymouth: Scarecrow Press 2007, (Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements, 78).
– “Philosophy and rhetoric in Western Greece: Focus on Empedocles and Gorgias,” in: Politics and performance in Western Greece, Essays on the Hellenic heritage of Sicily and Southern Italy, ed. Heather L. Reid, Davide Tanasi & Susi Kimbell, Sioux city (Iowa): Parnassos Press -Fonte Aretusa 2017, p. 193-204.
[A 1, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 135, B 139, B 140, B 143, B 144.]
– “The techne of nutrition in ancient Greek philosophy,” Archai, 29, 2, 2020, p. 1-34.
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/30363/25709
[Emp. p. 5-7.]
Preller, Ludwig, “Zur Kritik der Fragmente des Empedokles,” Zeitschrift für die Alterthumswissenschaft, 18, 1837, col. 153-158
[Analysis and emendation of B 2.1-2, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 40, B 96.]
Prier, Raymond Adolph, “Empedocles 17. 1-13. A suggested reconstruction and interpretation,” Platon, 28, 1976, p. 214-223.
– Archaic Logic: symbol and structure in Heraclitus, Parmenides, and Empedocles, The Hague-Paris: Mouton 1976, (De proprietatibus litterarum, series Practica, 11).
[P. 120-148.]
Primavesi, Oliver, (1996) “Zur Geschichte des Deutschen Papyruskartells,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 114, 1996, p. 173-187.
– (1997) “Der Strassburger Empedoklespapyrus,” in: Der Neue Pauly, III, ed. H. Cancik & H. Schneider, Stuttgart-Weimar 1997, p. 1015.
– (1997) Empedoklesstudien: Ein unveröffentlichter Papyrus und die indirekte Überlieferung, Habilitationsschrift, Frankfurt 1997.
– (1998) “Editing Empedocles. Some longstanding problems reconsidered in the light of the Strasburg Papyrus,” in: Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte in der Antike. Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi. Atti del Seminario internazionale Ascona, Centro Stefano Franscini, 22-27 Settembre 1996, ed. W. Burkert, L. Gemelli Marciano, E. Matelli & L. Orelli, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1998, (Aporemata, 3), p. 62-88.
– (1998)“Neues zur aristotelischen Vorsokratiker-Doxographie,” Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption, 8, 1998, p. 25-41.
[Pap. Strasb. aI.6-aII.3 versus Arist. Met. 1000 a 18 - b 19.]
– (1998) “Empedocle: il problema del ciclo cosmico e il Papiro di Strasburgo,” Elenchos, 19, 2, 1998, p. 241-288.
[Elenchos 19, 2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.]
– (1999) “Empedokles von Akragas,” in: Große Gestalten der griechischen Antike, ed. K. Brodersen, Munich: C. H. Beck 1999, p. 216-223.
– (2001) “La daimonologia della fisica empedoclea,” Aevum Antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 3-68.
[Scholia, B 115. Important: text actually printed in Fev. 2003.]
– (2002) “Lecteurs antiques et byzantins d’Empédocle. De Zénon à Tzétzès,” in: Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie Présocratique ? What is Presocratic philosophy?, ed. A. Laks & C. Louguet, Lille: Presses universitaires du Septentrion 2002, p. 183-204.
– (2003) “Die Häuser von Zeus und Hades: zu Text und Deutung von Empedokles B 142 D.-K,” Cronache Ercolanesi, 33, 2003, p. 53-68.
[B 6, B 142.]
– (2004) “Empedocles,” in: Brill’s New Pauly, Antiquity, Volume 4, Cyr-Epy, English edition, ed. H. Cancik & H. Schneider, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2004, p. 943-947.
– (2005) “The structure of Empedocles’ cosmic cycle: Aristotle and the Byzantine Anonymous,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 245-265.
– (2005) “Theologische Allegorie: Zur philosophischen Funktion einer poetischen Form bei Parmenides und Empedokles,” in: Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt, ed. Marietta Horster & Christiane Reitz, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2005, (Palingenesia, 85), p. 69-93.
[B 6, B 21.9-12, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 115, B 134.]
– (2006) “Empedokles in Florentiner Aristoteles-Scholien,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 157, 2006, p. 27-40.
– (2006) “Die Suda über die Werke des Empedokles,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 158, 2006, p. 61-75.
– (2006) “Apollo and Other Gods in Empedocles,” in: La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici / The Construction of Philosophical Discourse in the Age of the Presocratics, ed. M. M. Sassi, Pisa: Edizioni della Normale 2006, p. 51-77.
[B 1152, B 1151, B 134.]
– (2007) “Teologia fisica, mitica e civile in Empedocle,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, (Skepsis, 19), p. 30-47.
[Scholia, B 35, B 21.12, B 6, B 115, B 147, fr. 9 Hunger, B 142, B 139.]
– (2007)“Zur Überlieferung und Bedeutung des Empedokleischen Titels „Καθαρμοί“,” in: Katharsiskonzeptionen vor Aristoteles. Zum kulturellen Hintergrund des Tragödiensatzes, ed. M. Vöhler & B. Seidensticker, Berlin-New York: W. de Gruyter 2007, p. 183-225.
[B 115, B 134, B 153a, fr. 152 Wright.]
– (2007) “Empédocle : divinité physique et mythe allégorique,” Philosophie antique, 7, 2007, p. 51-89.
[Scholia, A 72, B 6, B 21, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 59, B 115, B 134, B 142, B 147, a(ii) 2.]
– (2008) “Empedocles: physical and mythical divinity,” in: The Oxford handbook of Presocratic philosophy, ed. P. Curd & D. W. Graham, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008, p. 250-283 (Chapter 8).
[Translation into English of the previous title in French, with a change of interpretation of B 59 – Scholia, A 72, B 6, B 21, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 59, B 115, B 134, B 142, B 147, a(ii) 2.]
– (2008) Empedokles Physika I: Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2008, (Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete, 22).
[B 17, a(i), a (ii), c, B 20, B 21, B 76, b, B 23, B 26, B 35, B 27a, B 28, B 27, B 29, B 30, B 31, d, B 139, f - Intermezzo: B 115, B 59. See review by R. Janko, 2010. [+ +].]
– (2009) “Medicine between natural philosophy and physician’s practice: A debate around 400 BC,” in: Quo Vadis medical healing: Past concepts and new approaches, ed. S. Elm & St. N. Willich, Springer Science + Business Media B. V. 2009, (= International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 44), p. 29-40.
[Empedocles as a doctor: p. 30-32. Empedocles’ physics: p. 32-34. Empedocles’ theory of the elements as a medical axiom in Philistion: p. 34-35.]
– (2010) “Aristoteles oder Empedokles? Charles Darwin und Eduard Zeller über einen antiken Ansatz zur Evolutionstheorie,” in: Eduard Zeller. Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert, ed. Gerald Hartung, Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter 2010, p 25-65.
http://www.leibniz-publik.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb00086286_00001.html
– (2011) “Zu Brechts Empedokles,” in: Der Philosoph Bertolt Brecht, ed. M. Mayer, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann 2011, p. 25-37.
– (2011) “7. Kapitel: Empedokles,” in: Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch / Deutsch, ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert von J. Mansfeld und O. Primavesi, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 2011, (Reclam Bibliothek, Hard cover, Bd. 10730), p. 392-563.
[Reprint with minor addenda and corrigenda in 2012², Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, 18971. [+ +].]
– (2011) “Henri II Estienne über philosophische Dichtung: Eine Fragmentsammlungals Beitrag zu einer poetologischen Kontroverse,” in: The Presocratics from the Latin Middle Ages to Hermann Diels. Akten der 9. Tagung der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung vom 5.–7. Oktober 2006 in München, ed. O. Primavesi & K. Luchner, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2011, (Philosophie der Antike, 26), p. 157-196.
– (2011) “Henri II Estienne on Greek philosopher poets: An epistle dedicatory as a model of early modern paratextuality,” in: Para/Textuelle Verhandlungen zwischen Dichtung und Philosophie in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Bernhard Huss, Patrizia Marzillo & Thomas Ricklin, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter 2011, (Pluralisierung & Autorität 26), p. 155-178.
[P. 171-172: 3.9 Estienne’s encounter with an Empedoclean fragment; p. 173: 3.10 Lucretius on Empedocles’ poetical inspiration; p. 173-175: 3.11 Ex ungue leonem; B 110, B 112.]
– (2013) “§ 13: Empedokles,” in: Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, I, Frühgriechische Philosophie, ed. H. Flashar, D. Bremer & G. Rechenauer, Basel: Schwabe 2013, p. 667-739.
[Short review by J. Mansfeld in Mnemosyne, 68, 2015, p. 331-343, at p. 340-341. See also A. Laks, Gnomon, 2016, p. 481-485.]
– (2014) “Empedokleisches im Tod des Empedokles: Ein neuentdeckter Text des Vorsokratikers und Hölderlins Trauerspiel,” in: Hölderlin in der Moderne. Kolloquium für Dieter Henrich zum 85. Geburtstag, ed. Friedrich Vollhardt, Berlin 2014, p. 13-41.
– (2015) “Die Zerstörungskraft der göttlichen Liebe: Empedokles im XII. Gesang von Dantes Inferno,” Deutsches Dante-Jahrbuch, 90, 2015, p. 36-74.
– (2016) “Empedocles’ cosmic cycle and the Pythagorean tetractys,” Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 5-29.
– (2016) “Der kosmische Zyklus des Empedokles und die pythagoreische Tetraktys,” Die neue Rundschau, 127, 3, 2016, (Friedrich Kittler, "Dunkle Physis, lichter Kosmos"), p 242-255.
– (2017) “O. Primavesi: Zur Genese der Tetraktys-Hypothese,” in: Götter und Schriften rund ums Mittelmeer, ed. Friedrich Kittler, Peter Berz, Joulia Strauss & Peter Weibel, zusammen mit Gerhard Scharbert, Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink 2017, p. 83-103.
– (2017) “Tetraktys und Göttereid bei Empedokles: Der pythagoreische Zeitplan des kosmischen Zyklus,” in: Götter und Schriften rund ums Mittelmeer, ed. Friedrich Kittler, Peter Berz, Joulia Strauss & Peter Weibel, zusammen mit Gerhard Scharbert, Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink 2017, p. 229-316.
– (2018) “Das ewige Widerspiel von Liebe und Streit: Neues zum kosmischen Zyklus des Empedokles,” der blaue reiter, 42 (title: Liebe), 2018, p. 63-67.
– (2021) “Pythagorean ratios in Empedocles’ physics,” in: Brill’s Companion to the reception of Presocratic natural philosophy in later classical thought, ed. C.H Harry & J. Habash, Leiden: Brill 2021, (Brill’s Companions to Philosophy, 6), p. 113-192.
[A 50, A 72, A 78, B 2, B 3, B 5, B 6, B 16, B 17, B 23, B 30, B 35, B 57, B 59, B 62, B 96, B 98, B 115, B 117, B 129, B 134, Scholia Rashed, fr. 91b MP (MP = Reclam).]
– (2021) “7. Kapitel: Empedokles,” in: Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch / Deutsch, ausgewählt, übersetzt und erläutert von J. Mansfeld und O. Primavesi, Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. 2021, (Reclams Universal-Bibliothek, 14173), p. 392-563.
[[+ +].]
– (2022) “Zitatfragment und Textkritik. Empedokles’ Theorie der Augenfunktion und der Text des Laternengleichnisses,” in: Lachmanns Erbe: Editionsmethoden in klassischer Philologie und germanistischer Mediävistik, ed. Bleuler A. K. & O. Primavesi, Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag 2022, (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie, 19), p. 427-572.
[A 86; B 6, B 17, B 22, B 26, B 62, B 84.]
– (2023) “Review of T. Wellmann, Die Entstehung der Welt, 2020,” Gnomon, 95, 2, 2023, p. 97-109.
– (2025) “Hesiod and Empedocles on the decline of humankind,” in: Myths of the golden age in European culture, ed. St. G. Nichols & Cl. Olk, New York-London: Routledge 2025, (Literary Criticism and Cultural Theory), p. 7-22.
[A 72, B 26a Bignone, B 35, B 128.]
Primavesi, Oliver & Andreas Patzer, “Die übertiefe Tiefe (Empedokles B 35, 3-5 und “Physika” I, 288-290,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 135, 2001, p. 1-10.
Primavesi, Oliver & Klaus Alpers, “Empedokles im Wiener Herodian-Palimpsest,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 156, 2006, p. 27-37.
[A new edition of B 153b.]
Primavesi, Oliver & Katharina Luchner (ed.), The Presocratics from the Latin Middle Ages to Hermann Diels. Akten der 9. Tagung der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung vom 5.–7. Oktober 2006 in München, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner 2011, (Philosophie der Antike, 26).
Provenza, Antonietta, “Soothing Lyres and epodai: Music Therapy and the Cases of Orpheus, Empedocles and David. The Charms of Music: Harmonia, Music Therapy and Musical Ethos,” in: Music in Antiquity. The Near East and the Mediterranean, ed. J. Goodnick Westenholz, Y. Maurey & E. Seroussi, Berlin-Boston-Jerusalem: Walter de Gruyter, Hebrew University Magnes Press 2014, (Yuval, Studies of the Jewish Music Research Centre, 8), p. 298-339.
[Emp. p. 314-323. A 1, B 112.].
Przyluski, Jean, “Les sept puissances divines en Grèce,” Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 18, 1938, p. 255-262
[B 22, B 30, B 84, B 115, B 134. A sketch of Emp. cosmology and its comparison with alleged Zoroastrian pattern. Nécessité.]
“Les mages et les Mèdes,” Revue de l’histoire des religions, 122, 1940, p. 85-101.
[P. 100. Nécessité = perpétue la Grande déesse. Sept puissances.]
Puett, Michael, J., To become a God: cosmology, sacrifice, and self-divinization in early China, Cambridge (Ma)-London: Harvard University Press 2002, (Harvard-Yenching Institute monographs series, 57).
[Emp.: p. 88-93. B 6, B 27, B 29, B 111, B 128, B 132, B 134, B 136.]
Puglia, Enzo, “Demetrio Lacone e Empedocle,” in: Atti del XVII Congresso internazionale di papirologia (Napoli 19-26 Maggio 1983), Napoli: Centro internazionale per lo studio dei papiri ercolanesi 1984, p. 437-446.
[B 100.1-2, B 142.]
– “Demetrio Lacone ed Empedocle,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 270-276.
[B 100.1-2, B 142, with a discussion of the articles by A. Martin and O. Primavesi on B 142.]
– “Empedocle e gli epicurei, la testimonianza dei papiri ercolanesi,” in: Quaderni di Atene e Roma. Cinque incontri sulla cultura classica, ed. M. Caposso, Lecce: Pensa Multimedia 2015, p. 71-81.
Radif, Ludovica, “Il logos eracliteo/empedocleo e la potenza ancestrale del filosofo sciamano,” Giornale di metafisica, 23, 2001, p. 257-280.
[B 111.]
Radlov, Ernest Lvovič, “Empedokl,” Žurnal ministerstva narodnago prosveščenija, otdel klassičeskoj filologii, 1889, sixth decade, parts 261-3, part 261 (February), p. 81-96, part 261 (March), p. 97-100, part 262 (April), p. 1-32, and part 263 (May), p. 33-51.
[Study and translation of some testimonies and fragments.]
Ragot, Pierre, “Une construction archaïque chez Empédocle,” Études classiques, 72, 3, 2004, p. 195-216.
[B 100.]
Rambaldi, Simone, “Empedocle e la bonifica di Selinunte: un breve riesame,” in: Selinunte si racconta: Cam 5 maggio 2010, Atti della giornata di studi, Fondazione Kepha Onlus - Cam 2010, (Camcantiere, 3), p. 12-17.
Ramelli, Ilaria & Angello Tonelli (trans.), “Empedocle,” in: I Presocratici. Prima traduzione integrale con testi originali a fronte delle testimonianze e dei frammenti nella raccolta di Hermann Diels e Walther Kranz, ed. G. Reale, Milan: Bompiani 2006, (Il pensiero occidentale).
[Emp.: p. 565-757. [ + ].]
Ramnoux, Clémence, (1959) Vocabulaire et structures de pensée archaïque chez Héraclite. Thèse. Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1959, (Collection d’études anciennes). Published as Héraclite ou l’homme entre les choses et les mots, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1959, (Collection d’études anciennes).
[Pages: 140-207, p. 427-447. B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 15, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 24, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 31, B 35, B 38, B 57, B 59, B 62, B 71, B 73, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 106, B 107, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 119, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 125, B 126, B 129, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 136, B 137, B 146.]
– (1959) La Nuit et les enfants de la Nuit dans la tradition grecque, Paris: Flammarion 1959, (Symboles). Reprint with a new introduction and an updated bibliography in Paris: Flammarion 1986, (Champs, 154).
[B 115, B 121, B 128.]
– (1960) “L’amour du lointain,” Revue de la Méditerranée (Alger), 25, 1960, p. 439-459.
[Reprint in Ramnoux, Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, p. 157-173 – B 106, B 110, B 129.]
– (1962) Mythologie ou la famille olympienne, Paris: Armand Colin 1962, (CAC, section de philosophie, 367), Brionne: Gérard Montfort 1962, (Imago Mundi).
[Emp.: p. 64 in the publication by Montfort. Cydéimos.]
– (1965) “ « Les fragments d’un Empédocle » de Fr. Nietzsche,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 70, 2, 1965, p. 199-212.
[Reprint in Ramnoux, Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, p. 143-156. B 5. B 17.1. "Palingénésie" for Wiedergeburt.]
– (1967) “Études présocratiques, III: Hippolyte, « Contre les hérésies » VII, 383 à 399,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 157, 1967, p. 31-41.
[Translation into French of Hippolytus and beginning of commentary. Reprint in Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, p. 94-102. B 6, B 16, B 29, B 110, B 115, B 131.]
– (1968) “Pourquoi les Présocratiques ?,” Revue philosophique de Louvain, 66, 91, 1968, p. 397-419.
[Reprint in Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, p. 123-141 with the title ‘Tradition et cosmologie chez Empédocle d’Agrigente’. Then in Études présocratiques II suivies de Etudes mythologiques ou de la légende à la sagesse, Paris: Klincksieck 1983, p. 154-172. – B6, B 128. C (y) d (oi) mos for Cadmos.]
– (1968) “Philosophie de la philosophie,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 66, 92, 1968, p. 581-596.
[Reprint in Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, p. 285-297, with the title "Conclusion. Mythe et philosophie". P. 583. L’Œuf cosmique. Empédocle accommodateur. Schéma imaginaire articulé selon la structure d’un cycle mythique (Cadmos).]
– (1968) Héraclite ou l’homme entre les choses et les mots. Deuxième édition, augmentée et corrigée, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1968², (Collection des études anciennes).
[See the fragments in the publication in 1959.]
– (1969) “Études présocratiques, III: Hippolyte, « Contre les hérésies » VII, 383 à 399 (suite),” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 159, 1969, p. 187-209.
[Follow up of the commentary after the translation in 1967. Cydoimos for Cadmos. Reprint in Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, p.103-121. B 29, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 128, B 131, B 134. P. 111: C (y) d (oi) mos for Cadmos.]
– (1969) “Empédocle,” in: Histoire de la philosophie, Tome I, Orient – Antiquité – Moyen Âge, ed. B. Parain, Paris: Gallimard 1969, (Encyclopédie de la Pléiade, 26), p. 439-442.
[B 6, B 17, B 27, Cydeimos.]
– (1970) Du nom propre du nom commun et du verbe, in: Les Études philosophiques, 4, 1970, (Les Présocratiques), p. 457-474.
[Reprint in Études présocratiques II, Paris: Klincksieck 1983, p. 114-130. Fr. 128, Kydeimos.]
– (1970) Études présocratiques, Paris: Klincksieck 1970, (Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences humaines de Paris-Nanterre, essais n° 4).
[Several reprints with sometimes different titles. – The first chapter of the book is a « Conférence prononcée au Collège philosophique – janvier 1966 », with the title « Pourquoi les Présocratiques ? », the content of which is not the content under the same title in 1968.]
– (1979), Parménide et ses successeurs immédiats, Monaco: Éditions du Rocher 1979, (Gnose).
[P. 136: B 123.]
– (1983) “Tradition et cosmologie chez Empédocle d’Agrigente,” in: Études présocratiques II, Paris: Klincksieck 1983, p. 154-172.
[Reprint of the same title in 1970, which is actually “Pourquoi les Présocratiques ?” of 1968 with a new title.]
– Études présocratiques II suivies de Etudes mythologiques ou de la légende à la sagesse, Paris: Klincksieck 1983. (P. 20-21: L’antagonisme d’Empédocle. P. 29-49: reading of Simplicius about the comparison of Anaxagoras with Empedocles drawn up by Aristotle, One and Many; the four elements; B 6, B 17. P. 114-130: reprint of "Du nom propre du nom commun et du verbe". P. 154-172: reprint of "Tradition et cosmologie chez Empédocle d’Agrigente".]
– See Alexandre Marcinkowski (ed.), Clémence Ramnoux. Oeuvres, tome I and tome II, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2020, (Encre marine).
Rangos, Spyros, “On Empedocles’ death (= “« Κύκλου δ’ ἐξέπταν βαθυπενθέος ἀργαλέοιο »: Περί της Εμπεδοκλέους τελευτής”),” Hypomnema (= Υπόμνημα στη Φιλοσοφία), 9, 2010, p. 53-84.
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/spyros-rangos
– “Empedocles on divine nature,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 75, 3, 2012, p. 315-338.
[B 6, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 28, B 29, , B 59, B 115, B 122, B 128, B 133, B 134, B 146, B 147.]
– “On the fascinating Empedocles once again,” Φιλοσοφία, 52, 2022, p. 331-334.
[This article was published in 2024. It is an introduction to the collection of five new articles on Empedocles published in Φιλοσοφία, 52, 2022. The authors of these articles are: S. Kouloumentas, M. Chondrokoukis, C. Zatta, J. Fabre-Serris, M. Garani.]
Ranjbar, Ebrahim, “World creating vortex: reconstructing the concept of δίνη in Empedocles’ cosmogenesis,” History of Philosophy (Tarikh-e-Falsafe), 2023.
Rappe, Guido, “Animismus, Hylozoismus und Sphairos des Empedokles,” in: Rehabilitierung des subjektiven: Festschrift für Hermann Schmitz, ed. von M. Grossheim & H.-J. Waschkies, Bonn: Bouvier 1993, p. 387-412.
[Emp.: p. 400-411. B 27, B 28, B 29. Kinship of the living.]
– Archaische Leiberfahrung: Der Leib in der frühgriechischen Philosophie und in außereuropäischen Kulturen, Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1995, (Lynkeus, Studien zur Neuen Phänomenologie, 2).
[Emp.: p. 170-200. B 6, B 110, B 115.]
– “Wiedergeburt als Mnemotechnik - Zur Anthropologie bei Empedokles und Platon,” in: Wiedergeburt und kulturelles Erbe / Reincarnation and cultural heritage / Ergebnisse und Beträge des Internationalen Symposiums der Hermann-und-Marianne-Strantik-Stiftung, ed. W. Schweidler, Weingarten 1999, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2001, p. 61-85.
Rashed, Marwan, (2001) “Review of D. de Smet, Empedocles Arabus. Une lecture néoplatonicienne tardive,” Elenchos, 22, 2, 2001, p. 440-444.
– (2001) “La chronographie du système d’Empédocle : documents byzantins inédits,” Aevum Antiquum, N.S. 1, 2001, p. 237-259.
[Scholia, B 115, B 128. Reprint in: Rashed, Marwan, L'Héritage aristotélicien : textes inédits de l’Antiquité, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2007, p. 543-565.]
– (2005) (ed.), Aristote. De la génération et la corruption. Texte établi et traduit par M. R., Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2005, (Collection des Universités de France).
[A 40, B 8, B 37, B 53, B 54.]
– (2007) “The structure of the eye and its cosmological function in Empedocles: Reconstruction of fragment 84 D.-K.,” in: Reading ancient texts. Volume I: Presocratics and Plato - Essays in honour of Denis O’Brien, ed. S. Stern-Gillet & K. Corrigan, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2007, (Brill’s studies in intellectual history, 161), p. 21-39.
[B 84.]
– (2008) “Le proème des Catharmes d’Empédocle. Reconstitution et commentaire,” Elenchos, 29, 1, 2008, p. 7-37.
[B 112, B 114, B 115, B 113, B 119, B 121.]
– (2008) “De qui la clepsydre est-elle le nom ? Une interprétation du fragment 100 d’Empédocle,” Revue des études grecques, 121, 2, 2008, p. 443-468.
[B 100.]
– (2011) “La zoogonie de la Haine selon Empédocle : retour sur l’ensemble ‘d’ du papyrus d’Akhmim,” Phronesis, 56, 1, 2011, p. 33-57.
– (2014) “La chronographie du système d’Empédocle : addenda et corrigenda,” Les Études philosophiques, 2014, 3, p. 315-342. Résumé & Abstract: p. 457.
[Byzantine scholia, B 30, B 35, B 96, B 115, B 129, B 143.]
– (2018) La Jeune fille et la Sphère. Études sur Empédocle, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, (Philosophies).
[A 30, A 56, A 72, B 30, B 38, B 62, B 84, B 87, B 100, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 119, B 121, B 137, ens. d, scholies.]
Rathmann, Wilhelm Walter, Quaestiones Pythagorae Orphicae Empedocleae, Halle 1933. Reprint in L. Tarán (ed.), Pythagoreanism II, New York: Garland 1987, (Greek & Roman philosophy, 33).
[B 115, B 129, B 133, B 134.]
Raynaud, J.-Philippe., De Empedocle, diss., Strasbourg: Silbermann 1848.
Reale, Giovanni, “Empedocle,” in: Storia della filosofia antica, Vol. 1, Dalle origini a Socrate, Milan: Vita e pensiero 1987 (5th ed., 1st ed.: Vita e pensiero 1975), p. 151-161.
[B 6, B 8, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 26, B 28, B 29, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 115, B 117, B 119, B 134, B 146, B 147.]
Reboredo Lemos, Luan, “Três fragmentos de Empédocles (B 30, B 110, B 115): texto grego e tradução,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 15, 29, 2021, p. 169-173.
– “Trois fragments d’Empédocle (B 30, B 110, B 115) : texte grec et traduction,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 15, 29, 2021, p.174-178.
– Le temps va-t-il disparaitre ? La doctrine d’Anaximandre sur la durée du monde et la durée des choses. Histoire, Diss. Sorbonne Université & Universidade federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2022.
[Emp.: Χρόνος chez Empédocle : particulariser le temps, p. 161-177. – B 17, B 30, B 110, B 115. θεόθεν.]
Regenbogen, Otto, “Eine Forschungsmethode antiker Naturwissenschaft,” in: Quellen und Studien für Geschichte der Mathematik, Astronomie und Physik, Abteilung B 1, 1930, p. 131-182.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-662-38293-6_3.pdf
Reiche, Harald Anton T., Empedocles’ Mixture, Eudoxan Astronomy and Aristotle’s “connate pneuma”, Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert 1960.
[B 27, B 28, B 134.]
Reimarus, H. S., De vita et scriptis Joannis Alberti Fabricii commentarius, Hamburgi 1737, p. 210-211, par. VIII.34.
[The author asserts he discovered in Fabricius’ Posthuma an extensive edition of Emp. fragments.]
Reinach, Salomon, “Le texte d’Empédocle, étude critique,” L’instruction publique, revue des lettres, sciences et arts, 1-4, 1876, p. I.165-7, II.183-4, III.247-9 and IV.277-9.
Reinhardt, Karl, Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie, Bonn: F. Cohen 1916.
– Kosmos und Sympathie: neue Untersuchungen über Poseidonios, Munich: C. H. Beck 1926.
– “Empedokles, Orphiker und Physiker,” Classical Philology, 45, 3, 1950, p. 170-179.
[Reprint in: Um die Begriffswelt der Vorsokratiker, ed. von H.-G. Gadamer, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 19681, 19832, 19893. B 3, B 4, B 16, B 17, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 31, B 79, B 90, B 92, B 99, B 105, B 112, B 131, B 134.]
Reiske, Johann, Jacob, Plutarchi volumen octavum, Operum moralium et philosophicorum. Partem tertiam tenens. Cum notis Gul. Xylandri, H. Stephani et Io. Iac. Reiskii, texto subiectis, Leipzig: G. T. Georgius 1777.
[P. 396: B 115.]
Renan, Joseph, Ernest. Mélanges d’histoire et de voyages, Paris: Calmann Lévy 1878.
[P. 103-104. Newton and Cagliostro.]
Renehan, Robert F., “Hera as earth-goddess: a new piece of evidence,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 117, 3-4, 1974, p. 193-201.
[B 6.]
– “On the Greek origins of the concepts incorporeality and immateriality,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 21, 2, 1980, p. 105-138.
[B 17, B 100, B 134.]
Renger, Almut-Barbara & Alessandro Stavru (eds.), Pythagorean knowledge from the ancient to the modern world: askesis, religion, science, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag 2016, (Episteme in Bewegung, 4).
Renius, C., “Three Views of a Candle,” Journal of Philosophy, 40, 1943, p. 633-634.
[Emp., Heracl., Pyth.]
Renouvier, Charles, Manuel de philosophie ancienne, I, Paris: Paulin 1844.
[Emp.: p. 163-182.]
Repici, Luciana, Uomini capovolti. Le piante nel pensiero dei Greci. Rome: Editori Laterza 2000, (Biblioteca di Cultura Moderna, 1152).
[P. 69-76: a section called “Empedocle: (I) storie di piante e di antiche mescolanze”. – P. 77-82: a section called “Empedocle: (II) storie di piante e di anime in pena. – P. 82-88: a section called “Empedocle: (III) storie di piante e di amore conteso”. A 35, A 70, A 72, A 86, A 87, B 6, B 7, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 37, B 39, B 54, B 57, B 58, B 59, B 60, B 61, B 62, B 77-78, B 79, B 82, B 89, B 90, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 115, B 117, B 127.]
Rexine, John E., “Daimon in classical Greek literature,” Platon [Πλάτων], 37, 1985, p. 29-52.
[B 59, B 115, B 122, B 126.]
Rey, Abel, La science dans l’Antiquité. La maturité de la pensée scientifique en Grèce, Paris: Albin Michel 1939, (L’évolution de l’humanité, I, 3).
[Emp.: p. 94-136. A 30, A 49, A 86, B 6, B 7, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 71]
Rhee Kee-Back, “Empedocles’ influence on Hippocratic medicine,” Korean J Med Hist, 22, p. 879-914, 2013.
http://medhist.kams.or.kr/2013/22-3-7.pdf
[Korean language, abstract in English.]
Rhees, Rush, In dialogue with the Greeks, Volume I: The Presocratics and reality, ed. D. Z. Phillips, Aldershot: Ashgate 2004, (Ashgate Wittgensteinian Studies).
[Emp.: "Indestructible Roots", p. 45-54, B 6.]
Rhodes, Peter, John & Robin Osborne, Greek historical inscriptions, 404-323 BC, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
[P. 247: B 6.]
Rider, Zackary P., Empedocles, Epicurus, and the failure of sacrifice in Lucretius, Thesis in classics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2011.
– The failure of sacrifice in the De Rerum Natura,” TAPA, 149, 2019, p. 1-26.
[B 128, B 137.]
Riedel, Manfred, “Empedokles und die Entmachtung der Physis,” Synthesis Philosophica (Zagreb), 10, 2, 1990, p. 367-377 (= Empedoklo i razmoćenje prirode,” Filozofskaja Istraživanja (Zagreb), 10, 37, 1990, p. 913-922).
Riedweg, Christoph, “Orphisches bei Empedokles,” Antike und Abendland, 41, 1995, p. 34-59.
– “Orfismo en Empédocles,” Taula, 27-28, 1997, p. 33-59.
[Spanish translation of Ophisches bei Empedokles, 1995.]
– Pythagoras: his life, teaching, and influence, translated by Steven Rendall, Ithaca-London: Cornell University Press 2005.
[B 129.]
– “'Sphaira', o la magia della rotondità perfetta nel pensiero dei Greci, 'Sphaira' or the magic perfect roundedness in Greek thought,” in: Esprit sphérique, ed. M. Bertoldini, Lugano-Milan: (Fondazione Galleria Gottardo, Lugano) Charta 2006, p. 309-319. Plus in German: p. 392-396.
[B 27, B 29, B 134.]
Ríos Gutiérrez, Iván de los, “El pluralismo jonio: azar y necesidad en la filosofía presocrática,” Taula: quaderns de pensament, 39, 2005, p. 23-39.
[Emp.: p. 27-30.]
https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Taula/article/download/76005/96619
Risch, Ernst, Wortbildung der homerischen Sprache. Zweite, völlig überarbeitete Auflage, Berlin-New York: W. de Gruyter 1974.
[P. 171-172, § 63b. Useful for B 84, κύκλοπα.]
Rispoli, Gioia Maria, “Empedocle nelle testimonianze ermarchee,” in: Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 241-269.
Ritter, August, Heinrich., “Über die philosophische Lehre des Empedokles,” in: Litterarische Analekten, vorzüglich für alte Litteratur und Kunst, deren Geschichte und Methodik, II, 4, ed. F. A. Wolf, Berlin: G.C. Nauck 1818.
[Reprint in 1820. Emp.: p. 411-460.]
– Geschichte der Philosophie, I, Hamburg: F. Perthes 1829, p. 506-539. (18362: p. 532-572).
– Histoire de la philosophie, I, 1, trad. C.-J. Tissot, Paris: Ladrange1835, p. 429-457.
– The history of ancient philosophy, I, trans. A. J. W. Morrison, Oxford-London: D. A. Talboys 1838, p. 487-524.
Ritter, August, Heinrich & Ludwig Preller, Historia philosophiae graeco-romanae, ex fontium locis contexta, Hamburg: F. Perthes 18381 (p. 108- 127 = § 168-181), [then, in the title, graeco et romanae instead of graeco - romanae] Gotha: F. A. Perthes 1857² (p. 124-152 = § 167-180), 18643, Gotha: F. A. Perthes 18694 (p. 105-129 = § 167-180), 18755, Gotha: F.A. Perthes 18786 (p. 87-111 = § 129-142), [then, in the title, graecae instead of graeco et romanae] Gotha: F. A. Perthes 18867 (p. 124-153 = § 129-142 B), Gotha: 18887 (p. 124-153 = § 129-142 B), 18988, 19139, Gotha: L. Klotz 193410 (p. 126-155 = § 162-184).
[From the 4th to the 10th so-called editions, the modifications of the text are due to other authors than Ritter (†) and Preller (†): G. Teichmueller, F. Schultess, E. Wellmann. [ + ]]
Rivaud, Albert, Le Problème du devenir et la notion de la matière dans la philosophie grecque depuis les origines jusqu'à Théophraste, Paris: Alcan 1906.
[Emp.: p. 179-189.]
– Les grands courants de la pensée antique, Paris: Armand Colin 19291, Paris: Armand colin 19383, Paris: Armand colin 19414, Paris: Armand colin 19536 (Section de philosophie, 118).
[Emp. : p. 51-54.]
Rives, James B., “The Theology of Animal Sacrifice in the ancient Greek World: origins and developments,” in: Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice, ed. J.W. Knust & Z. Várhelyi, Oxford University Press 2011, p. 187-202.
[Emp.: p. 189-194, B 137.]
Robertson, Noel, Religion and reconciliation in Greek cities: The sacred laws of Selinus and Cyrene, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
[Empedocles in Selinus: p. 152-153.]
Robin, Léon, La pensée grecque et les origines de l’esprit scientifique, Paris: La Renaissance du Livre 1923, (L’évolution de l’humanité). (Paris: La Renaissance du Livre 19322, Paris: A. Michel 19483, 19634, 19733).
[In 1923, Emp. p. 119-134. – In 1973, Emp.: p. 123-136. B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 27, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 62, B 84, B 96, B 100, B 111, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 134.]
– “Quelques survivances dans la pensée philosophique des Grecs d’une mentalité primitive,” Revue des Études Grecques, 49, 230, 1936, p. 255-292.
[Emp.: p. 261, 263-265. B 6, B 117, B 126, B 127, B 141. Lévy-Bruhl.]
Roche, Paul, “Citing Empedocles: A bilingual pun at Ovid Met. 15 5,” The Classical Quarterly, 68, 2, 2018, p. 552-556.
Rodríguez-Moreno, Inmaculada, “Retórica y taumaturgia: el poder de la palabra en Empédocles,” in Actas: Primer encuentro interdisciplinar sobre retórica, texto y comunicación: Cádiz 9, 10, 11 de diciembre de 1993, 1, ed. A. Ruiz Castellanos, Cádiz, 1994, p. 32-38.
– “ΔΑΙΜΟΝΕΣ, ΗΡΩΕΣ Υ ΑΓΓΕΛΟΙ en la filosofía presocrática,” HABIS, 26,1995, p. 29-46.
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/fichero_articulo?codigo=58043&orden=0
– “El simbolismo y el « De fluviis » de Pseudoplutarco,” in: El amor en Plutarco, ed. J. M. Nieto Ibáñez & R. López López, León: Universidad de León 2007, p. 859-866.
Roecklein, Robert, J., “Parmenides’ influence on Empedocles and Anaxagoras,” in: Plato versus Parmenides. The debate over coming-into-being in Greek philosophy, Lanham (Maryland): Lexington Books 2011, p. 57-81.
[B 2, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 17, B 21, B 28, B 29, B 23, B 35, B 62.]
Roeper, Gottlieb, “XXIV. Emendationsversuche zu Hippolyti Philosophumena,” Philologus, 7, 1852, p. 511-553, and “XXVII Emendationsversuche zu Hippolyti Philosophumena (vgl. heft 3)” p. 606-637.
[P. 606: ad B 117 = A 31.]
Roggo-Van Luijn, Nathasja, Review of Reconstructing Empedocles’ Thought by Chiara Ferella, Classical World, 118, 1, 2024, p. 107-108.
Roguin, Claire-Françoise, “Les querelles d’Océanos et de Téthys : de l’Enûma Elish à la cosmogonie d’Empédocle,” in: κορυφαίῳ ἀνδρί. Mélanges offerts à André Hurst, ed. A. Kolde, A. Lukinovich, A.-L. Rey, Genève: Droz, 2005, (Recherches et rencontres, 22), p. 377-384.
Rohde, Erwin, Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen, Freiburg i. B.-Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr 1894. (1898². Rohde died in 1898.)
[Emp.: § 6, p. 465-480. Same title in Tübingen 19218, p. 171-187. French translation: Psyché: le culte de l'âme chez les Grecs et leur croyance à l'immortalité, Paris: Payot 1928, (Bibliothèque scientifique). B 2, B 3, B 17, B 23, B 35, B 105, B 110, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 121, B 126, B 127, B 128, B 129, B 134, B 135, B 136, B 143, B 145, B 146, B 147.]
Rolland, Romain, Empédocle d’Agrigente et l’Âge de la Haine, Paris: La Maison française d’art et d’édition 1918, (Les Cahiers du Carmel, 1). Reprint: R. Rolland, Empédocle d’Agrigente suivi de l’Éclair de Spinoza, Paris: Éditions du Sablier 1931.
[Emp.: p. 17-104. B 2, B 3, B 6, B 9, B 10, B 11, B 16, B 17, B 20, B 24, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 29, B 30, B 31, B 33, B 35, B 38, B 64, B 82, B 90, B 100, B 105, B 96, B 97, B 112, B 113, B 114, B 115, B 116, B 117, B 121, B 122, B 123, B 124, B 125, B 126, B 128, B 129, B 130, B 134, B 135, B 141, B 147, B 148.]
– Εμπεδοκλής ο Ακραγαντίνος και η εποχή του μίσους, μτφρ.Τ.Μπάρλα, Εκδόσεις Αστρολάβος, 1989.]
Rolle, Alessandra, “Il blitum. Un ortaggio a immagine d’uomo,” Cahiers de l’ILSL (Université de Lausanne), 60, Mélanges de linguistique, de philologie et d’histoire ancienne offerts à Rudolf Wachter, ed. M. Aberson et al., 2020, p. 49-54.
[B 62.]
Roloff, Dietrich, Gottähnlichkeit, Vergöttlichung und Erhöhung zu seligen Leben. Untersuchungen zur Herkunft der platonischen Angleichung an Gott, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1970.
[Pages 192-197: the text is devoted to Katharmoi, i.e. a daimon and its pollution, earth as an underworld and especially to attitude god – man.]
Roos, Carl, Nietzsches Empedokles-Fragmenter: Introduktion og fortolking, København 1937.
Roscher, Wilhelm Heinrich, Die Hebdomadenlehren der griechischen Philosophen und Ärzte. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechische Philosophie und Medizin, Der Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Klasse der königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 24/6, Leipzig: Teubner 1906.
[P. 35-36. The role of the number seven in Empedoclean embryology (B 153a, A 82) was influenced by teaching of old-Pythagorean school.]
Rosenfeld-Löffler, Annette, see first publication under Loeffler, Annette.
– La Poétique d’Empédocle. La signification cosmologique de l’expression poétique de l’œuvre d’Empédocle, diss., Université de Lausanne 2001.
– La Poétique d’Empédocle. Cosmologie et métaphore, Bern: Peter Lang 2006.
Rösler, Wolfgang, Reflexe vorsokratischen Denkens bei Aischylos, Meisenheim 1970.
– “Lukrez und die Vorsokratiker. Doxographische Probleme im 1. Buch von De rerum natura,” Hermes, 101, 1973, p. 48-64.
[A 21.]
– “Der Anfang der Katharmoi des Empedokles,” Hermes, 111, 2, 1983, p. 170-179.
[B 112.]
Ross, George Robert Thomson, Aristotle: De sensu and De memoria. Text and translation with introduction and commentary, Cambridge: University Press, 1906.
[B 84.]
Ross, William David, Aristotle’s Metaphysics. A revised text with introduction and commentary, I, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1924.
[B 6, B 8.]
– Aristotle’s Physics. A revised text with introduction and commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1936.
[B 53, B 61.]
– Aristotle: Parva naturalia. A revised text with introduction and commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1955.
[A 73, B 84, B 100.]
Ross Hernández, José Alberto, “Respuesta a las teorías de Empédocles y Anaxágoras,” in: Dios, eternidad y movimiento en Aristóteles. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2007, (Filosófica; 198).
Rossetti, Livio, “Empedocle scienziato,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 95-198.
[A 34, A 68, B 84, A 67, B 100, B 134.]
– “Caratteristiche tipologiche dei trattati Περὶ φύσεως nei secoli VI-V a. C.,” Nova tellus, 24, 2, 2006, p. 111-146.
http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/novatell/v24n2/0185-3058-novatell-24-02-111.pdf
– “Empedocle,” in: Dizionario delle Scienze e delle Tecniche di Grecia e Roma, ed. Paola Radici Colace, Pisa-Rome: F. Serra 2010, p. 431-432.
– “Un recente libro su Empedocle,” Quaderni urbinati di cultura classica, 121, 1, 2019, p. 145-150. [Review of Xavier Gheerbrant, Empédocle, une poétique philosophique, Paris, Classiques Garnier, 2017.]
Rostagni, Augusto, “Il poema sacro di Empedocle,” Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica, 51, 1923, p. 7-39.
– Il verbo di Pitagora, Torino: Fratelli Bocca 1924. Reimpr. 2001, 2005 Victrix (Forli).
[Chap. VIII: Il poema pitagorico di Empedocle e la storia dell’anima, p. 119-153. It is a reprint of l poema sacro di Empedocle 1923.]
– “Autonomia e svolgimento della letteratura greca di Sicilia,” Kokalos, 3, 1957, p. 3-17.
[Emp.: p. 13-14.]
Ροῦσσος, Ευάγγελος, N., Προσωκρατικοί, τόμος Δ': Eμπεδοκλής, Αthens: Stigmi Editions 2007, (Βιβλιοθήκη Αρχαίων Συγγραφέων, 25).
[[+ +].]
Roux, Suzanne. “Empedocles to Darwin,” in: Greek research in Australia: Proceedings of the biennial international conference of Greek studies, ed. E. Close, M. Tsianikas & G. Frazis, Flinders University April 2003, Adelaide: Flinders University Department of Languages - Modern Greek 2005, p. 1-16.
Якубанис, Генрих Иванович, (Rozhansky), Эмпедокл философ, врач и чародей, Ун-та св. Владимира, Kiev: H. Т. Корчак-Новицького 1906.
https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_003731498/
Rowett (previously Osborne), Catherine, (2009) “La naissance de la philosophie,” in: Histoire de la philosophie, ed. J.-F. Pradeau, Paris: Le Seuil 2009, p. 9-36.
– (2013) “A Portable Presocratics Primer?,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21, 4, 2013, p. 791-797.
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/d-w-graham-tegp
[A critical and interesting review of Graham, D., The texts of early Greek philosophy.]
– (2013) “Literary genres and judgements of taste: some remarks on Aristotle’s remarks about the poetry of Empedocles,” in: Literarische Form und Argument in antiker Philosophie, ed. M. Erler, Berlin: De Gruyter 2013, p. 305-314.
[A 1.]
– (2013) “Is Agathon’s Speech in Plato’s Symposium recycling the views of Empedocles?,” in: X Symposium Platonicum – The Symposium, Pisa: 2013, p. 169-175.
[B 23, B 111.]
– (2016) “Love, Sex and the Gods: Why things have divine names in Empedocles’ poem, and why they come in pairs,” Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 80-110.
– (2020) “Analytic philosophy, the ancient philosopher poets and the poetics of analytic philosophy,” Rhizomata, 8, 2, 2020, p. 158-182.
– (2021) “Review of M. Rashed, La jeune fille et la Sphère. Études sur Empédocle,” Philosophie Antique, 21 (Les éléments), 2021, p. 269-272.
Rudberg, Gunnar, “Empedokles und Evolution,” Eranos, 50, 1952, p. 23-30.
Rudin, O. V., Рудин О. В., “The great Greek “charlatan”: Empedocles,” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38, 1, 2022, p. 52-63. Великий греческий «шарлатан»: Эмпедокл, Вестник СПбГУ. Философия и конфликтология. 2022. Т. 38. Вып. 1
Rudoph, Kelli, “Sight and the Presocratics: approaches to visual perception in early Greek philosophy,” in: Sight and the ancient senses, ed. Michael Squire, London-New York: Routledge 2016, (The senses in Antiquity), p. 36-53.
[B 84.]
Ruiz, Nicolas, Leon, “Review of Reality (2003) by Peter Kingsley,” in: The Agonist, III, 2, 2008, p. 26-38.
Rundin, John Scott, “The Vegetarianism of Empedocles in its historical context,” The Ancient World, 29, 1, 1998, p. 19-36.
[Published by Ares Publishers Inc., A 1, B 17, B 137, democracy / aristocracy.]
Ruocco, Ernesto, “Daimon, Sphairos, Ananke. Psicologia e teologia in Empedocle,” in: Forme del sapere nei presocratici, ed. A. Capizzi - G. Casertano, Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo 1987, p. 187-221.
[P. 194-5: B 115, p. 195-6: B 117, p. 196-8: B 146, p. 198-9: B 112.4-6, p. 199-200: B 128, p. 201-3 et passim: daimon, p. 207-8 et passim: B 134, p. 208-10 et passim: sfairos, p. 217-20: ananke etc.]
Rupprecht, Karl, “Empedocles fr. 133,” Philologus, 79, 33, 1924, p. 112.
[B 133.]
Rusten, Jeffrey Stuart, “Ovid, Empedocles and the Minotaur,” American Journal of Philology, 103, 1982, p. 332-333.
[B 61.2-3.]
Russell, D. A., “Remarks on Plutarch’s De vitando aere alieno,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 93, 1973, p. 163-171.
[B 115.]
Russell, Donald, Andrew & Wilson, Nigel, Guy (eds.), Menander Rhetor. Edited with translation and commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1981.
Sabatini, Anna Michelle, “Metempsychosis and individual identity in Edgar Allan Poe’s ‘The black cat’,” Miscelánea, 70, 2024, p. 139-157.
[Keywords: Edgar Allan Poe, Pythagoras, Empedocles, metempsychosis, daemon.]
Saetta Cottone, Rossella, (2011) “Nuvole e demoni. Empedocle e Socrate nelle Nuvole di Aristofane,” in: La storia sulla scena, ed. A. Beltrametti, Roma: Carocci 2011, p. 315-335.
[Muse, Nestis, Persephone, Zeus, B 149, B 38, B 21 2-6, B 44, B 84, B 73, B 23, B 71, B 146, A 56, A 60.]
– (2013) “Aristophane et le théâtre du soleil. Le dieu d’Empédocle dans le chœur des Nuées,” in: Comédie et Philosophie: Socrate et les "Présocratiques" dans les Nuées d'Aristophane, ed. A. Laks & R. Saetta Cottone, Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm 2013, p. 61-85, (Études de littérature ancienne, 21).
[A 30, A 56, B 29, B 44, B 131, B 134, B 146.]
– (2014) “Jean Bollack et Empédocle : une histoire de philotès,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 6, 12, 2012, p. 1-5. Released in October 2014.
http://www.revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/1449/1290
– (2017/2018) “Le soleil comme reflet et la question de la connaissance dans la pensée d’Empédocle : aux origines d’une image,” χώρα • REAM, 15‑16, 2017/2018, p. 415‑444.
[A 30, A 56, A 57, B 2, B 3, B 5, B 28, B 29, B 44, B 109, B 112, B 131, B 133, B 134, B 135, B 146.]
– (2019) “Review of Giorgio Colli, Empedocle, a cura di Federica Montevecchi, Adelphi, Milan, 2019,” Anais de filosofia clássica, 13, 26, 2019, p. 187-195.
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/FilosofiaClassica/article/view/35825/19794
[B 3, B 29, B 105, B 110, B 115, B 134.]
– (2023) Soleil et Connaissance. Empédocle avant Platon, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2023, (encre marine).
[A 30, A 56, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 27, B 29, B 38, B 44, B 59, B 62, B 84, B 105, B 109, B 110, B 112, B 131, B 134, B 135, B 146.]
https://www.lesbelleslettres.com/livre/9782350882031/soleil-et-connaissance
– (2023) “De la Sphère à la pensée : le sens d’une reprise (Empédocle, fr. 29 et fr. 134 DK),” in: Lire Jean Bollack – Jean Bollack lesen, ed. S. Cudré-Mauroux, Ch. König & M. Steinrück, Basel: Schwabe 2023, (Bollackiana, 1), p. 135-152.
[B 29, B 44, B 134.]
Saffrey, Henri Dominique, “Nouveaux oracles chaldaïques dans les scholies du Paris. gr. 1853,” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes, 43, 1969, p. 59-72.
[P. 64-7: B 121.3. Reprint in: Saffrey, H. D., Recherches sur le néoplatonisme après Plotin, Paris: J. Vrin 1990, (Histoire des doctrines de l’Antiquité classique, 24), p. 81-94.]
Saint-Pierre, B., “La physique de la vision dans l’antiquité,” Cahiers des études anciennes, 5, 1976, p. 97-117.
Salles, Ricardo (ed.), Cosmology and biology in ancient philosophy: from Thales to Avicenna, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021.
[A 30, A 74, A 86, A 97, B 57, B 61, B 63, B 100, B 105, B 136.]
Sallis, John, The figure of nature: on Greek origins, Bloomington-Indianapolis: Indiana University Press 2016, (Studies in Continental thought).
[Emp.: p. 37, 42-57, 91-92; B 3, B 6, B 8, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 38, B 63, B 98, B 110.]
Samson, A., “Aristote et les théories présocratiques sur la connaissance,” Laval théologique et philosophique, 22, 1966, p. 22-44.
[On Aristotle’s and Empedocles’ theory of cognition: different and common points.]
Sánchez i Bernet, Andrea, “Afrodita demiurga en Danaides (fr. 44 Radt): ecos presocráticos en Esquilo san tra filologia e dialettologia : alcune riconsiderazioni su una variante omerica,” Sileno, 49, 1/2, 2023, p. 219-234.
Sandywell, Barry, Presocratic reflexivity: The construction of philosophical discourse c. 600-450 BC. – Logological Investigations, Vol 3, London-New York: Routledge 1996.
[Chapter 8, p. 354-363: Emp.]
Sänger, Edouard, “Empedokles,” Wiener Blätter für die Freunde der Antike, 8, 1932, p. 106-110.
[General and unoriginal attempt at a total portrait of Emp. personality and teaching.]
– Empedokles von Agrigent Fragmente: In der Nachdichtung von Eduard Saenger. Mit sechs Original-Radierungen von Bernard Schultze, Tiessen 1993.
Sangermano, B. Luigi, Empedocle, vita e frammenti dei poemi, Girgenti 1911.
[This contains Scinà’s translation from 1813. [ + ].]
Sansone, David, “Socrates’ “tragic” definition of color (Pl. Meno 76 D-E),” Classical Philology, 91, 4, 1996, p. 339-345.
[A 49, A 86, A 921, B 84, B 89, B 96, B 100.]
Santamaría, Marco Antonio, “Divine crime and punishment: breaking the cosmic law in Hesiod’s Theogony 783-806 and Empedocles’ fragment DK B115,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 294-312.
[B 5, B 6, B 84, B 115, B 116, B 117, B 118, B 122, B 126, B 136, B 139.]
Santaniello, Carlo, (1994) “Ricordo di Renato Laurenti con bibliografia dei suoi scritti,” Studi filosofici, 17, 1994, p. 51-68.
– (2001) “Faults commited beyond this life: Pindar and Empedocles in Plutarch’s demonology,” in: Estudios sobre Plutarco: misticismo y religiones mistéricas en la obra de Plutarco, Actas del VII Simposio Español sobre Plutarco (Palma de Mallorca, 2-4 de noviembre de 2000), ed. A. Pérez Jiménez & Fr. Casadesús Bordoy, Madrid-Málaga: Ediciones Clásicas/Charta Antiqua 2001, p. 255-267.
[On status of Emp. daimon, B 15, B 115.]
– (2004) “Empedocle: uno o due cosmi, una o due zoogonie?,” in: Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, ed. L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Bari: Levante editori 2004, (‘Le Rane’, Collana di studi e testi, 37), p. 23-81.
[B 17.1-5, ad B 271, A 37, B 26.3-7, Pap. Strasb. a(i)8-a(ii)2 = B 21.7-12, Pap. Strasb. c2-8 = B 20.]
– (2004) “Plutarco e i presocratici,” in: La biblioteca di Plutarco, Atti del IX Convegno Plutarcheo, (Pavia, 13-15 giugno 2002), ed. I. Gallo, Napoli: M. D’Auria 2004, (“Collectanea”, 23), p. 107-133.
– (2005) “Working on Empedocles in Plutarch’s Days (Fac. lun. 926D ff.],” in: Plutarc a la seva època: Paideia i Societat. Actas del VIII Simposio internacional de la Societat Española de Plutarquistas, Barcelona 6-8. nov. 2003, ed. M. Jufresa, F. Mestre, P. Gomez & P. Gilabert, Barcelona: Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas 2005, p. 445-451.
– (2009) “Il demone in Empedocle,” in: Potere e religione nel mondo indo-mediterraneo tra ellenismo e tarda antichità, Incontro di studio della Società Italiana di Storia delle Religioni (Roma, 28-29 ottobre 2004), ed. G. Gnoli & G. Sfameni Gasparro, Roma: Isiao 2009, (Il Nuovo Ramusio, 9), p. 329-361.
[B 115, B 146, B 147, B 30, B 31, B 59, B 112.]
– (2010)“Due frammenti e l’analogia in Empedocle: B115 D.-K. e il fr. 110 Bollack,” Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft, 13, 2010, p. 17-50.
http://gfa.gbv.de/dr,gfa,013,2010,a,02.pdf
– (2012) “Θεός, Δαίμων, Φρὴν Ἱερή: Empedocles and the Divine,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 75, 3, 2012, p. 301-313.
[B 21, B 59, B 115, B 134.]
– (2013) “An Akkadian myth and the daimon's fault in Empedocles fr. 115,” in: Religion in the history of European culture, ed. G. Sfameni Gasparro, A. Cosentino & M. Monaca, Palermo: Officina di Studi Medievali 2013, p. 133-145.
[B 115.]
– (2021) “Are Empedoclean daimons really made of anything? The nature of the Daimon and fragment 115,” in: Penser les dieux avec les Présocratiques, ed. R. Saetta Cottone, Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm 2021, (Études de littérature ancienne, 28), p. 143-159.
[A 85, A 98, B 9, B 23, B 59, B 115, B 117, B 129, B 146-147.]
– (2022) “Empedocles Democraticus?,” in: Our beloved polites: Studies presented to P.J. Rhodes, ed. D. Leão, et al., Oxford: Archaeopress 2022, p. 256-271.
[A 1. A 1.52, 63-67, B 6, B 30, B 111, B 112, B 146, B 147.]
– (2022) “Putting fragments in their places: The lost works of Empedocles,” Elenchos, 43, 2, 2022, p. 197-228.
[A 23, B 2, B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 34, B 35, B 39, B 96, B 98, B 111, B 115, B 121, B 123, B 128, B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 142. Subject of B 142 would be Apollo.]
– (2022) “Empedoclean epistemology,” Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 31, 2022. p. 1-24.
[B 2, B 3, B 131, B 133, B 134.]
– “Empedocles B30: ἐθρέφθη or ἐρέφθη? παρ᾽ἐλήλαται or παρελήλαται?,” Emerita, 91, 2, 2023, p. 251-270.
[B 17, B 27, B 30.]
– “Review of Rossella Saetta Cottone, Soleil et connaissance. Empédocle avant Platon,” Elenchos, 45, 1, 2024, p. 167-172.
Santillana, Giorgio de S., The origins of scientific thought: from Anaximander to Proclus, 600 B.C to 300 A.D., Chicago: University Press 1961.
[P. 108-128: Love, Strife, and Necessity; several fragments are quoted.]
Santori, Claudio & Gilardoni, Giovanni, Empedocle: Tutti i frammenti, trad. di. C. Santori, introduzione e commento di G. Gilardoni, Cortona: Calosci 1987.
[[+ +].]
Sartorius, Maximilian Alexander, “Die Entwicklung der Astronomie bei den Griechen bis Anaxagoras und Empedokles, in besonderen Anschluss an Theophrast, diss.,” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 82-3, 1883, p. 197-231 and 1-28.
[Also published separately, Heynemann’sche Buchdruckerei, Halle 1883. Emp.: 83, p. 23-26: an useless and uncomplete enumeration of disiecta membra of Empedoclean astronomy, no interpretation.]
Santoro, F.: see De Santoro.
Sassi, Maria, Michela, (2001) The Science of Man in ancient Greece, translated by P. Tucker, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press 2001.
[Originally published as La scienza dell’uomo nella Grecia antica, Torino 1988. Emp.: A 81, A 83, B 63, B 67, B 82.]
– (2009) Gli inizi della filosofia: in Grecia, Torino: Bollati Boringhieri 2009, (Nuova Cultura - Introduzioni, 208).
['Empedocle e il suo dèmone': p. 189-198. P. 216-217. 'Fra Muse e altri dèi': 229-237. B 1, B 2, B 3, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 129, B 138, B 146.]
– (2009) “Entre corps et lumière : réflexions antiques sur la nature de la couleur,” in: L’Antiquité en couleurs, textes réunis par Marcello Carastro, Grenoble: Jerôme Millon 2009.
[Feu et eau, blanc et noir: d’Empédocle à Aristote; B 71.2-3 B 21.3.]
– (2013) “Where epistemology and religion meet - What do(es) the god(s) look like?,” Rhizomata, 1, 2, 2013, p. 283-307.
[B 133, B 134.]
– (2016) “Parmenides and Empedocles on Krasis and knowledge,” Apeiron, 49, 4, 2016, p. 451-469.
[Published On-line: 10/21/2015. A 86, B 2, B 3.]
– (2018) The beginnings of philosophy in Greece, translated by Michele Asuni, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2018.
[Originally published as Gli inizi della filosofia in Grecia, 2009 by Bollati Boringhieri. "Empedocles and His Daimōn": p. 129-136. P. 150-151. "Between Muses and other Gods": p. 160-167. B1, B2, B 3, B 8, B 105, B 107, B 109, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 129, B 131, B 138, B 146.]
– (2022) “Blood and the awareness of perception. From early Greek thought to Plato’s Timaeus,” Apeiron, published online May 2, 2022, p. 1-24. Printed version: April 2023, 56, 2, p. 163-186.
[A 86, B 100, B 105, B 143.]
– (2022) “Philosophical theories of colour in ancient Greek thought – and their relevance today,” Ancient Philosophy Today: Dialogoi, 4, 2, 2022, p. 155-175.
[A 69a, B 6, B 23, B 71, B 84, B 90, B 96.]
Saudelli, Lucia, “Monde, abîme, corps : le fragment 163 des Places (p. 62 Kroll) des Oracles chaldaïques,” in: Oracles chaldaïques: fragments et philosophie, ed. A. Lecerf, L. Saudelli & H. Seng, Heidelberg: Winter 2014, (Bibliotheca Chaldaica, 4), p. 43-56.
[P. 55-56: B 121.]
– “Les « plaies » d’Empédocle et la mythologie infernale chez Philon d’Alexandrie,” in: Philo of Alexandria and Greek myth: narratives, allegories, and arguments, ed. F. Alesse & L. De Luca, Leiden -Boston: Brill 2019, (Studies in Philo of Alexandria, 10), p. 252-270.
[A 49, A 66, A 72, B 12, B 43, B 115, B 121.]
Scalas, Giulia, “‘Le anime sono sangue’ (ref. I 22, 5 = 340 Usener): una testimonianza ‘Ippolitea’ sulla psicologia di Epicuro,” Lexicon Philosophicum, 3, 2015, p. 199-226.
[A 30, A 97, B 105.]
– “Le fer et l’aimant : l’explication épicurienne des phénomènes d’attraction dans le De naturalibus facultatibus de Galien,” Les études philosophiques, 144, 1, 2023, p. 111-140.
[A 89.]
Scaliger, Josephus, M. Manilii Astronomicon libri quinque, Iosephus Scaliger Iul. Caes. F. recensuit ac pristino ordini suo restituit. Eiusdem Ios. Scaligeri commentarius in eosdem libros et castigationum explicationes, Lutetiae: apud Mamertum Patissonium Typographum regium, in officina Roberti Stephani 1579.
[P. 17: B 13, B 28, and p. 247: B 44.]
Scarpat, Giuseppe, “Salomone astronomo come Empedocle: la vis ventorum nel Libro della Sapienza,” in: Studia classica Johanni tarditi oblata, ed. L. Belloni, G. Milanese & A. Porro, Milan: Vita e pensiero 1995, p. 739-748.
Scarpi, Paolo, “Empedocle mago,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 143-156.
Scapin, Nouria, “Review of Saetta Cottone, Soleil et connaissance. Empédocle avant Platon,” The Classical Review, 2024, published online 27 March 2024, p. 1-2.
Šćepanović, Sandra, Αἰών and χρόνος. Their semantic development in the Greek poets and philosophers down to 400 BC, diss., Jesus College, Oxford, 2011.
– Empedokle, O ustrojstvu sveta i ljudskoj sudbini. Fragmente s grčkog prevela: Marjanca Pakiž, Novi Sad (Serbia): Akademska Knjiga 2021, (Horizonti). [+ +]
Schaerer, René, L’homme antique et la structure du monde intérieur, d’Homère à Socrate. Paris: Payot 1958.
[Emp.: p. 158-162. B 6, B 17, B 23, B 27, B 31, B 35, B 57, B 61, B 115, B 116, B 121, B 128, B 130, B 136.]
Schefer, Christina, Platon und Apollon: vom Logos zurück zum Mythos, Sankt Augustin: Akademia Verlag 1996, (International Plato studies, 7).
[Emp.: p. 41-46. B 3.3-5, B 131, A 23, B 29, B 134.]
Scheier, Claus-Artur, “Mython akousas. Zum Grund der Dichtung bei Parmenides und Empedokles,” Internationale Zeitschrift für Kulturkomparatistik, 5, 2022, p. 327-350.
[B 2, B 3, B 120, B 131, B 137.]
Schibli, Hermann, Sadun, Pherekydes of Syros, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1990.
[B 6, B 115, B 120, B 121.]
– “Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient philosophy, mystery, and magic”, Ancient Philosophy, 16, 2, 1996, p. 455-462.
[A detailed reproduction of contents, but almost worthless for Empedoclean studies.]
– Hierocles of Alexandria, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
[B 112, B 115, B 121, B 158.]
Schiefsky, Mark, John, Hippocrates. On ancient medicine. Translated with introduction and commentary, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2005, (Studies in ancient medicine, 28).
[P. 302-305; A 51, A 70, B 6, B 17, B 23, B 84, B 100.]
Schirren, Thomas, “Empedokles. Das Handwerk der Sinne,” in: Thomas Schirren, Aisthesis vor Platon: Eine semantisch-systematische Untersuchung zum Problem der Wahrnehmung, Stuttgart-Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1998, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 117), p. 213-236.
[A 86, A 89, B 2, B 3, B 17, B 71, B 75, B 84, B 88, B 89, B 106, B 109, B 110.]
– “Review of L’Empédocle de Strasbourg by A. Martin, O. Primavesi,” Zeitschrift für philologische Forschung, 56, 3, 2002, p. 472-476.
Schläger, Richard, “Empedocles Agrigentinus quatenus Heraclitum Ephesium in philosophia secutus sit scripsit R. S, diss.,” in: Jahresbericht über das Karl-Friedrichs-Gymnasium zu Eisenach von Ostern 1877 bis Ostern 1878, Eisenach: Hofbuchdruckerei 1878.
Schmalzriedt, Egidius, ΠΕΡΙ ΦΥΣΕΩΣ: zur Frühgeschichte der Buchtitel, Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag 1970.
Schmidt, Yasmin, Ovids Epos und die Tradition des Lehrgedichts: Mythos und Elementenlehre in den »Metamorphosen«, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2021, (Hypomnemata, 210)
[Empedocles often cited. Apollonius Rhodius is also cited, mainly for Orpheus’ song. A 72, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 27, B 35, B 38, B 55, B 59, B 62, B 112, B 115, B 128, B 129, B 137, a MP.]
Schmitz, Hermann, Der Ursprung des Gegenstandes: von Parmenides bis Demokrit, Bonn: Bouvier 1988.
[Emp.: p. 299-350.]
– Der Weg der europäischen Philosophie: Eine Gewissenserforschung. 1 Antike Philosophie, Münich: Karl Alber 2007.
[Emp.: p. 106-118.]
Schneider, Johann Gottlob, Griechisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch, Leipzig 1819-18213.
[B 3.11, B 20.7.]
Schneidewin, Friedrich Wilhelm, “Neue Verse des Empedokles,” Philologus, 6, 1851, p. 155-167.
[B 6, B 36, B 17, B 16, B 29, B 28, B 115, B 110, B 31, B 3.1-2.]
Schnarnagl, Theobald, “Der Philosoph Empedokles in seiner Eigenschaft als Dichter,” in: Programm des Kommunal-Ober-Gymnasiums in Komotau, Komotau: Spania 1907-1908, p. 3-16, 1908-1909, p. 3-19.
Schofield, Malcolm, “Empedocles,” in: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. Craig, New York 1998, without pagination, 6 pages.
– “Empedocles,” in: The shorter Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. Craig, London-New York: Routledge 2005, p. 220-221.
– “Review of S. Trépanier, Empedocles. An interpretation, 2004” The Classical Review, 56, 1, 2006, p. 12-14.
– “Review of M. M. Sassi, The Presocratics, La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’ età dei Presocratici,” The Classical Review, 58, 1, 2008, p. 4-6.
Scholten, Clemens, Theodoret. De Graecarum affectionum curatione. Heilung der griechischen Krankheiten. Übersetzt, eingeleitet und mit Anmerkungen versehen von C. S., Leiden-Boston: Brill 2015, (Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae, 126).
Schöne, Alfred, “Die Empedoclea des Sallustius,” Jahrbücher für klassischen Philologie, 12, 1866, p. 751-752.
[A 27; printed also separately in Leipzig 1866.]
Schottlaender, Rudolf, “Drei vorsokratische Topoi,” Hermes, 62, 1927, p. 435-446.
– “Apollon und Pythagoras,” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 10, 1956, p. 333-351.
Schreckenberg, Heinz, Ananke. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Wortgebrauchs, Munich: C. H. Beck 1964.
[P. 111-113 et passim. B 115, B 30.]
Schrier, O.J., “Five Notes on Conjectures in Aristotle’s Poetics,” Mnemosyne, 51, 1998, p. 576-578.
[B 143.]
Schuhl, Pierre-Maxime, Essai sur la formation de la pensée grecque. Introduction historique à une étude de la philosophie platonicienne, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1949², (Bibliothèque de philosophie contemporaine). First edition: 1934.
[B 115, 129.]
Schumacher, Joseph, “Der Physis-Begriff bei Empedokles,” Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften, 34, 1941, p. 179-196.
[B 8, B 62.]
Schwabl, Hans, “Empedokles, fr. B 110,” Wiener Studien, 69, 1956, p. 49-56.
– “Zur ‘Theogonie’ bei Parmenides und Empedokles,” Wiener Studien, 70, 1957, p. 278-289.
[B 122, B 123, B 128.]
– “Hesiod und Parmenides,” Rheinisches Museum, 106, 1963, p. 134-142.
Sciavicco, G., Gorgia di Leontini nella letteratura greca di Sicilia: Fonti e sviluppo della sua attività sofistico-retorica, Messina: Scuola Tipografica Antoniana 1939.
Scinà, Domenico, Memorie sulla vita e filosofia d’Empedocle Gergentino I-II, Palermo: Stamperia Reale 1813 (Milan: G. Silvestri 18382; Milan 18583; Palermo: Lo Bianco 18594, Sangermano 19115; Bologna 19576; Bologna: Capelli 19877). [The edition in 1838 has a bad layout; and the Greek edition of the fragments has been deleted. The edition in 1859 is a single volume.]
[[+ +].]
Sciortino, Calogero, Empedocle: un enigma tra intuizioni e aporie, 2011.
http://ubaldoriccobono.wordpress.com/tag/sciortino/
Scoon, Robert Maxwell, Greek philosophy before Plato, Princeton University Press 1928.
[Emp.: p. 82-94.]
Scott Wilson, Emmons, Elements of Presocratic thought in the "Histories" of Herodotus, diss., Indiana University, 1990.
Seaford, Richard, “Immortality, salvation, and the elements,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 90, 1986, p. 1-26.
[B 115.]
Sedley, David, Neil, (1989) “The Proems of Empedocles and Lucretius,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 30, 1989, p. 269-296.
– (1991) “Empedocles’ theory of vision and Theophrastus’ De sensibus,” in: Theophrastus: his psychological, doxographical, and scientific writings, ed. W. W. Fortenbaugh & D. Gutas, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers 1991, (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, 5), p. 20-31.
[A 86, par. 8-9, B 84.]
– (1998) Lucretius and the transformation of Greek wisdom, Cambridge-New York-Melbourne: Cambridge University Press 1998.
[Emp.: Chapter I-II. B 8, B 17, B 84, B 112, B 115, B 139.]
– (2003) “Lucretius and the new Empedocles,” Leeds International Classical Studies, 2, 4, 2003, p. 1-12.
– Plato’s Cratylus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003, (Cambridge studies in the dialogues of Plato).
[B 9.]
– (2005) “Empedocles’ life cycles,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, ed. A. L. Pierris, Patras: Institute for Philosophical Research 2005, p. 331-371.
[First presentation of the revised cycle with 60 oscillations of Love’s and Strife’s dominance: Sphairos/60 alternating phases of Love followed by Strife/Sphairos etc.]
– (2007) “The Empedoclean opening,” in: Lucretius, ed. M. R. Gale, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press 2007, (Oxford Readings in Classical Studies), p. 48-87.
[A repetition of Chap. 1 of Lucretius and the transformation of Greek wisdom.]
– (2007) Creationism and its critics in Antiquity, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press 2007, (Sather classical lectures, 66).
[Chap. 2: Empedocles, p. 31-74; larger parts of this chapter are drawn from Sedley 2005; A 70, A 72, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 26, B 35, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 76, B 84, B 86, B 87, B 95, B 96, B 98, B 115, B 124, B 128, B 129, a(ii), d, scholies Aristotle; important contribution.]
– (2016) “Empedoclean superorganisms,” Rhizomata, 4, 1, 2016, p. 111-125.
– (2018) “L’allusion empédocléenne en Lucrèce II, 1081-1083,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 145-159.
[Pap. Strasb. 391-300 = a(ii)21-30, B 17.26.]
– (2020) “An Empedoclean allusion in Lucretius (2.1081-3),” in: Euphrosyne: Studies in ancient philosophy, history, and literature, ed. P. Burian, J. Strauss Clay & G. Davis, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2020, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 370), p. 15-28.
[English version of ‘L’allusion empédocléenne en Lucrèce II, 1081-1083’ in Les Présocratiques à Rome, Paris, 2018, p. 145-159.]
Seeck, Gustav Adolf, “Empedokles B 17. 9-13, B 8, B 100 bei Aristoteles,” Hermes, 95.1, 1967, p. 28-53.
[B 8, B 17, B 100.]
Seligman, Paul, “Soul and cosmos in Presocratic philosophy,” in: Dionysius Halifax, II, 1978, p. 5-17.
[The author supposes that evolution of conceptions of souls corresponds to evolution of a model of inner existence and inner cosmos: Anaximenes, Heraclitus, Emp.]
Semenzato, Camille, “La divine parole d’Empédocle,” in: C. Semenzato, À l’écoute des Muses en Grèce archaïque : la question de l’inspiration dans la poésie grecque à l’aube de notre civilisation, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2017, p 308-327
[In a chapter entitled "Parménide et Empédocle, deux poètes-penseurs".]
Semuškin, Anton Vasiljevič (Семушкин А.В.), Эмпедокл, Moscow: Mysl 1985, 19942.
[An enthusiastic and mystic interpretation of Emp. life and main theses of his teaching à la R. Rolland. Not very original, but fairly interesting. A poetic translation of Katharmoi is appended. [ + ].]
– Zagadka Empedokla,” Istoriko-filosofskij ježegodnik, 88, 1988, p. 22-37.
[The mystery of Empedocles. Author’s psychologic attempt to explain Emp. life and philosophy is based on a presumption of existence two quite different poems expressing two different parts of Emp. personality.]
Senis, B., “Πείρατος ἐν δεσμοῖσιν. Ἐν πείρασι δεσμῶν,” Σύγκτισις, γ, 1987, p. 66-83.
[The meaning of concept moira, B 17 etc.]
Séris Émilie, “Renaissance de la poésie didactique : Homère philosophe et Empédocle poète,” Itaca. Quaderns Catalans de Cultura Clàssica, 35-36, 2019-2020, p. 193-207.
Sezgin, Fuat (ed.), (Pseudo-)Empedocles in the Arabic tradition: texts and studies collected and reprinted, Frankfurt am Main: Institute for the history of Arabic-Islamic science 2000, (Islamic philosophy, 109).
[D. Kaufmann 1899, A. Nagy 1901.]
Sfameni Gasparro, Giulia, “Critica del sacrificio cruento e antropologia in Grecia: Da Pitagora a Porfirio, I. La tradizione pitagorica, Empedocle e l’orfismo,” in: Sangue e antropologia I, ed. Francesco Vattioni, Roma: Edizioni pia unione preziosissimo sangue 1987, p. 107-155.
[Emp.: p. 135-140.]
– “Daimonic power,” in: The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion, ed. E. Eidinow & J. Kindt, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, p. 413-427.
[B 115.]
Sforza, Ilaria, “Gli attorioni molioni e la categoria del «doppio naturale»: Omero, il mito e le immagini,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, Serie IV, 7, 2, 2002, p. 297-320.
[B 60, B 61.]
Sharpe, Charles Henry, “The shoes of Empedocles,” Proceedings of the Classical Association, 27, 1930, p. 9-10.
Shaw, Gregory, “Review of P. Kingsley, Reality,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2004.07.43 http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2004/2004-07-43.html
Shaw, Michael, M., “Aither and the four roots in Empedocles,” Research in Phenomenology, 44, 2, 2014, p. 170-193.
[B 6, B 9, B 17, B 21, B 38, B 54, B 71, B 78, B 100, B 96, B 98, B 111, B 115.]
– “Architecture and eternity: Physis in Nietzsche and Empedocles,” in: Ontologies of nature. Continental perspectives and environmental reorientations, ed. G. Kuperus & M. Oele, Springer International Publishing 2017, (Contribution to phenomenology, 92), p. 3-27.
[B 6, B 8, B 17, B 26, B 35, B 110, B 112, B 115, B 153.]
– “Sound, water, and the unity of life in Empedocles,” in: Hearing, sound, and the auditory in Ancient Greece, ed. J. Gordon, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 2022, (Studies in Continental Thought), p. 21-58.
[A 70, A 86, A93, B 2, B 3, B 5, B 6, B 49, B 72, B 84, B 89, B 99, B 109, B 152.]
– “Hypenerthe in Homer and Empedocles,” in: Empedocles in Sicily, ed. Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Jennifer Ferriss-Hill & Heather L. Reid, Siracusa (Sicily)-Dakota Dunes (SD): Parnassos Press 2024, (The Heritage of Western Greece, 12), p. 121-148.
[B 17, B 26, B 27.]
– “Empedocles, Aristotle, and the unity of all things,” Proceedings of Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 38, 1, 2024, p. 39-80.
Sheppard, Anne, “Review of P. Kingsley: Ancient philosophy, mystery and magic,” The Classical Review, 46.2, 1996, p. 269-271.
Sherman, P., “Empedocles,” in: The Encyclopedia Americana, New York-Chicago, 1932, Volume X, p. 299-300.
[Useless.]
Shields, Christopher, Aristotle: De anima. Translated with an introduction and commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press 2016.
Sider, David, (1982) “Empedocles’ Persika,” Ancient Philosophy, 2, 1982, p. 76-78.
[B 34.]
– (1984) “Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the poetry of adhesion,” Mnemosyne, 37, 1/2, 1984, p. 14-24.
[B 96.]
– (1985) “Review of Empedocles: The extant fragments, by M.R. Wright, 1981,” Ancient Philosophy, 5, 1985, p. 314-317.
[B3, B4, B 12, B 17, B 22, B 38, B 57, B 129, B 133, B 146.]
– (1997) The epigrams of Philodemos. Introduction, text, and commentary, New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997.
[P. 94: B 98. P. 215: B 96.]
– (2022) “Ordovico or Viricordo: Empedocles and the seim anew,” in: Song regained: working with Greek poetic fragments, ed. M. Alexandrou, C. Carey & G. B. D’Alessio, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2022, (Sozomena, 20), p. 55-76.
[B 3, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 25, B 35, B 62, B 71, B 73, B 76, B 96, B 100, B 110, B 115, B 139, d5-6.]
– (2022) “Review of T. Mackenzie, Poetry and poetics in the Presocratic philosophers: reading Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles as literature,” BMCR, 04.04 2022.
Siebeck, Hermann, Geschichte der Psychologie, Erster Theil, erste Abtheilung: Die Psychologie vor Aristoteles, Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes 1880.
[P. 49-55, 106-109. 126, 145, 150, 152, 266, 270, 272. P.108: B 84.]
Sieben, Karen, “Empedocles: Nietzsche’s failed reformer,” in: Conflict and competition: Agon in Western Greece, ed. H. L. Reid, John Serrati & Tim Sorg, Sioux City: Parnassos Press – Fonte Aretusa 2020, p. 251-266.
Siefert, Georg, De aliquot Plutarchi scriptorum moralium compositione atque indole. Diss. Leipzig: Teubner 1896.
Siegel, Rudolf E., “Theories of vision and colour perception of Empedocles and Democritus: some similarities to the modern approach,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 33, 1959, p. 145-159.
[A 86, par. 7-9, A 912. Read in abbreviated form at the thirty-first annual meeting of the American Association for the History of Medicine, New York, May 22, 1958.]
Silk, Michael, S., “Pindar, Olympian 2.5-7, Text and commentary––with excursions to ‘Perictione’, Empedocles, Euripides’ Hippolytus,” The Classical Quarterly, 70, 2, 2020, p. 499-517.
[B 112.3.]
Silva, Robert, Brenner, Barreto da, “A homologia entre o pensamento do intelecto e os inteligíveis: a abordagem de Plotino no tratado v.3 [49] e um diálogo possível com Empédocles de Agrigento,” Kínesis, 12, 33, 2020, p. 248-260.
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/kinesis/article/view/11360
Simon, Gérard, Le regard, l’être et l’apparence dans l’optique de l’Antiquité, Paris: Seuil 1988, (Des travaux, 7).
[B 84.]
Simondon, Michèle, “La Muse d’Empédocle : Patronage mythique des formes du savoir,” in: Formation et survie des mythes, travaux et mémoires, Actes du Ier colloque du Centre d’études mythologiques de l’Université Paris X, Nanterre, 19-20 avril 1974, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1977, p. 21-29.
[B 3, B 4, B 131.]
– La mémoire et l’oubli dans la pensée grecque jusqu’à la fin du Ve siècle avant J.-C. : psychologie archaïque, mythes et doctrines, Paris, Les Belles Lettres 1982.
[B 3, B 105, B 117, B 115, B 128, B 129.]
Singer, Charles, “The strange histories of some anatomical terms,” Medical History, 3, 1, 1959, p. 1-7.
[B 70.]
Sinnige, Theo, Gerard, Matter and infinity in the Presocratic schools and Plato, Assen: Van Gorcum & Co. 1968, (Wijsgerige teksten en studies, 17).
[Chapter V: Empedocles, p. 111-118. P. 198-201, and several other pages. B 2, B 3, B 6, B 11, B 12, B 13, B 14, B 17, B 27, B 29, B 129, B 134, B 135.]
Siqueira-Batista, Rodrigo, A. P. Gomes & R. S. Batista, “Lições de ‘fisiologia’ – pelo médico-filósofo Empédocles de Agrigento,” Alétheia, 2, 2, 2011, p. 105-111.
https://periodicos.unipampa.edu.br/index.php/Aletheia/issue/view/105/90
Siracusano, Anna, Il santuario rupestre di Agrigento, in località S. Biagio, Rome: G. Bretschneider 1983, (ΣΙΚΕΛΙΚΑ, 2).
[Nestis: p. 67.]
Sisko, John E., “Anaxagoras and Empedocles in the shadow of Elea,” in: The Routledge Companion to ancient philosophy, ed. J. Warren & F. Sheffield, New York-London: Routledge 2014, p. 57-63.
Sitzler, Jakob, “Jahresbericht über die griechischen Lyriker ... für 1888-1891: Empedokles,” in: Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, 75, 1893, p. 246-247
[B 156: some textual suggestions and the defense of authenticity of verses.]
Skarsouli, Pénélope (Pinelopi), (2005) “Compte rendu de l’ouvrage de Simon Trépanier, Empedocles. An interpretation (2004),” in: Revue philosophique de Louvain, 103, 1-2, 2005, p. 194-199.
– (2005) “La paroimia en tant que forme discursive chez les Présocratiques. Réflexions sur Empédocle et Héraclite,” Revue de philosophie ancienne, 23, 2, 2005, p. 39-54.
[B 24, B 25.]
– (2006) “Calliope, a Muse apart: Some remarks on the tradition of memory as a vehicle of oral justice,” in: Oral Tradition, 21, 1, 2006, p. 210-228.
[B 131: p. 220-223.]
http://journal.oraltradition.org/issues/21i/skarsouli
– (2007) “Review of L. Rossetti & C. Santaniello, Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle, 2004,” Revue philosophique de Louvain, 105, 1-2, 2007, p. 162-168.
– (2009) “S'interroger sur la relation entre couleurs et mots. Le terme Phármakon chez Empédocle,” in: L’Antiquité en couleurs : catégories, pratiques, représentations, ed. M. Carastro, Grenoble: J. Millon, 2009, p. 165-177.
[B 3, B 21, B 23, B 96.]
– (2010) “'Confiner le monde par des mots'. Réflexions sur la cosmologie (et la) poétique d’Empédocle : le terme πεῖραρ,” in: Texte du monde - Monde du texte, ed. I. Milliat-Pilot, Grenoble: J. Millon, 2010, (Horos), p. 231-244.
[B 17.15, B 17.25-26, B 17.12-13, B 24.]
– (2010) “Des papyri grecs en contexte funéraire. L’exemple de "L’Empédocle de Strasbourg",” Mètis, N.S. 8, 2010, p. 167-187.
– (2021) “Review of X. Gheerbrant, Empédocle, une poétique philosophique, 2017,” Revue des études anciennes, 2021 on-line, in ‘Notes de lecture’.
– (2024) “Review of Jean-Claude Picot, Empédocle. Sur le chemin des dieux,” Philosophie antique, on-line May 2024,
http://journals.openedition.org/philosant/7892
Skarsouli, Penelope & Lalou, Aggeliki, Εμπεδοκλης. Περι φύσεως, Αθήνα : Εκδ. του Εικοστού πρώτου 1999.
[Introduction, translation, and short commentary on Peri physeos.]
Skemp, Joseph Bright, The theory of motion in Plato’s later dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1942.
[P. 52-64. Chap. 4: “Antecedents of the κίνησις-doctrine of the ‘Timaeus’ in the system of Empedocles”. Reprint in 2013.]
Skoda, Françoise, Médecine ancienne et métaphore : le vocabulaire de l’anatomie et de la pathologie en grec ancien, Paris: Peeters/Selaf 1988, (Ethnosciences, 4).
[Might be useful for B 84, B 99, B 100.]
Skutsch, Otto, The Annals of Q. Ennius, edited with introduction and commentary by O. S., Oxford: Clarendon Press 1985. Reprint in 2003.
Slings, Simon R., “Μονίη in Empedocles and a rule of Greek word formation,” Mnemosyne, 44, 1991, p. 413-415.
[B 28, B 29.]
Smith, Andrew (ed.), Porphyrii Philosophi fragmenta, ediidit A. S., fragmenta arabica David Wasserstein interpretante, Stuttgart – Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1993, (Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana).
[A 1, A 2, B 96, B 105, B 115.1-2, B 117, B 126.]
Smith, Martin Ferguson, “Fragments of Diogenes of Oenoanda discovered,” American Journal of Archaelogy, 74, 1, 1970, p. 51-74.
[Emp.: p. 58-60: A 99.]
– “New readings in the text of Diogenes of Oenoanda,” The Classical Quarterly, 22, 1972, p. 162.
[A 99.]
– Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean inscription, Napoli: Bibliopolis 1993.
https://www.english.enoanda.cat/fragments.html
[A 99.]
– Supplement to Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean inscription, Naples: Bibliopolis 2003.
Snell, Bruno, Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie (σοφία, γνώμη, σύνεσις, ἱστορία, μάθημα, ἐπιστήμη), Berlin: Weidmann 1924. (B 109, B 129.)
– “Hera als Erdgöttin,” Philologus, 50, 1943, p. 159-160.
[B 6.]
– Die Entdeckung des Geistes. Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen, Hamburg: Claassen Verlag 19553, (19461, 19482, Göttingen 1975).
[Emp.: 284-298; Translations: The discovery of the mind, Oxford 1953; La découverte de l’esprit, Combas: Éditions de l’Éclat 1994, (Polemos). B 84.]
Snyder, Jane McIntosh, “Lucretius' Empedoclean Sicily,” The Classical World, 65, 1972, p. 217-218.
[A 21.]
Solmsen, Felix, “Zur griechischen Wortforschung,” Indogermanische Forschungen, 31, 1912-1913, p. 448-506.
Solmsen, Friedrich, (1950) “Tissues and the soul,” Philosophical Review, 59, 1950, p. 435-441.
– (1958) “Aristotle and Presocratic cosmogony,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 63, 1958, p. 265-282.
– (1960) Aristotle’s system of the physical world: A comparison with his predecessors, Ithaca - New York: Cornell University Press 1960, (Cornell studies in classical philology, 33).
[A 30, A 52, A 53, A 56, A 67, A 70, A 78, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 27, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 37, B 48, B 56, B 71, B 73, B 90, B 96, B 98.]
– (1961) “Greek philosophy and the discovery of the nerves,” Museum Helveticum, 18.3, 1961, p. 150-167.
[B 98, B 105.]
– (1963) “Nature as craftsman in Greek thought,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 24, 1963, p. 473-496.
[Emp.: p. 476-479.]
– (1963) “A Review of Reiche,” American Journal of Philology, 84, 1963, p. 91-94.
– (1965) “Love and Strife in Empedocles’ cosmology,” Phronesis, 10, 2, 1965, p. 109-148.
[B 17, B 35, B 71, B 73, B 75, B 76, B 96.]
– (1967) “ζωρός in Empedocles,” The Classical Review, 17, 1967, p. 245-246.
[B 35.15.]
– (1975)“Eternal and temporary beings in Empedocles’physical poem,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 57, 2, 1975, p. 123-145.
[B 17, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 110, B 117.]
– (1980) “Empedocles’ Hymn to Apollo,” Phronesis, 25, 3, 1980, p. 219-227.
[B 131, B 132, B 133, B 134, B 135.]
– (1982) “Reincarnation in ancient and early Christian thought,” F. Solmsen, Kleine Schriften III, Hidelsheim - Zürich - New York: G. Olms1982, p. 465-494.
[B 117, B 129.]
Sorabji, Richard, Matter, space and motion: theories in Antiquity and their sequel, London: Duckworth 1988.
Söring, Jürgen, “Nietzsches Empedokles-Plan,” Nietzsche Studien, 19, 1990, p. 176-211.
Souilhé, Joseph, “L’énigme d’Empédocle,” Archives de Philosophie, 9, 3, 1932, p. 337-359.
[B 2, B 3, B 4, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 28, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 58, B 59, B 61, B 62, B 71, B 84, B 96, B 98, B 105, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 114, B 115, B 117, B 118, B 119, B 120, B 121, B 122, B 124, B 125, B 128, B 129, B 131, B 133, B 134, B 136, B 137, B 138, B 145.]
Sousa, Eudoro de, “Empédocles,” in: Filosofia grega, ed. G. Cornelli & M. Mota, Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília 2013. p. 46-57.
Souza, Jonathan, Almeida de, “A harmonía na cosmogonia de Empédocles de Agrigento: um procedimento de Amor e de Ódio,” in: J. Souza, Para uma primeira história da harmonía: das musas à música, Diss. (Mestrado em Filosofia) Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2018, p. 46-59.
https://www.academia.edu/37247546/Para_uma_primeira_hist%C3%B3ria_da_harmon%C3%ADa_das_musas_%C3%A0_m%C3%BAsica
Spantidaki, Stella, “Textile production in Iron Age Greece: the case of the Amorgina textiles,” Origini, 40, 2017, p. 293-303.
[B 84.]
Speakman, Caleb, Empedocles θεός: the poetics of divinity in Empedocles and his reception, Master’s Thesis, Department of religious studies and classics, The University of Arizona, 2021.
[B 1, B 4, B 6, B 17, B 20, B 23, B 24, B 109, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 119, B 128, B 130, B 134, B 146, B 142. Ovid.]
Spoerri, Walter, “'Crescebant uteri terram radicibus apt': à propos de la zoogonie de Lucrèce (De rerum natura 5, 791 sqq.),” in: Nomen latinum: Mélanges de langue, de littérature et de civilisation latine offerts au professeur André Schneider, ed. Denis Knoepfler, Faculté des lettres de Neuchâtel, Genève 1997, p. 55-82.
[A comparison between Lucretius and Emp. is appended in appendix.]
Sprague, Rosamond K., “Empedocles, Hera, and Cratylus 404 C,” The Classical Review, 22, 1972, p. 169.
[B 6.]
Sprengel, Kurt Polycarp Joachim, Empedoclis commenta de Protogaea illustraturus iuvenis ornatissimi Bernhardi Casimiri Iosephi Góra, Poloni, disputationem inauguralem die XVII. ian. MDCCCXXV. habendam eiusque promotionem celebrandam indicit, Halae: Typis F. A. Grunerti patris filiique 1825.
Squillace, Giuseppe, Menecrate di Siracusa. Un medico del IV secolo a.C. tra Sicilia, Grecia e Macedonia, Hildesheim: Olms 2012, (Spudasmata, 141).
– “Da Alcmeone di Crotone a Empedocle di Agrigento,” Wall Street Journal, scienza e tecnologia, 19/01/2016.
https://wsimag.com/it/scienza-e-tecnologia/19133-da-alcmeone-di-crotone-a-empedocle-di-agrigento
– Filistione di Locri. Un medico del IV secolo a. C. tra Grecia, Magna Grecia e Sicilia, Hidelsheim - Zürich - New York: Olms 2017, (Spudasmata, 170).
[Emp.: p. 36, 54, 73.]
Staab, Gregor, Pythagoras in der Spätantike, Munich-Leipzig: K. G. Saur 2002, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 165).
[Emp., p. 56-57, as a Pythagoras’ pupil.]
Stace, Walter, Terence, A critical history of Greek philosophy, London-Basingstoke: Macmillan 1920.
[Emp.: p. 98-102.]
Stamatellos, Giannis, Plotinus and the Presocratics: A philosophical study of Presocratic influences in Plotinus’ Enneads, Albany (New York): Sunypress 2007.
[B 115 (p. 166-168), (B 120 (p. 167), B 134 (p. 38).]
– Introduction to Presocratics: a thematic approach to early Greek philosophy with key readings, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2012.
[Mostly influenced by M.R. Wright.]
Stamatopoulou, Zoe, “Constructing other eras in didactic poetry: Two case-studies,” in: Teaching through images: imagery in Greco-Roman didactic poetry, ed. J. Strauss Clay & A. Vergados, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2021, (Mnemosyne, Supplements, 450), p. 39-62.
[A 72, B 57, B 61, B 62.]
Stanley, Thomas, The history of philosophy, III, 1, London: H. Moseley & Th. Dring 1660.
[In the first part, Emp.: p. 146-153.]
Star, Christopher, Apocalypse and Golden Age: The end of the world in Greek and Roman thought, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press 2021.
[B 128.]
Staugaard, K. E., “Empedokles, 'Physiolog eller poet?',” Museum Tusculanum, 40, 1980, p. 23-38.
Šťáva, Robert, “Proč Slunce svítí a hřeje? : Empedoklés: Oheň? Ano, opět oheň!,” Studia philosophica, 70, 2, 2023, p. 95-100.
[Translation of the title: Why does the sun shine and warm? Empedocles: Fire? Yes, fire Again! A 1, A 30, A 33, A 49, A 53, A 63, A 65, B 21, B 48, B 56, B 84.]
Stavru, Alessandro, “Socrate psuchagogos. À propos d’Aristophane, Oiseaux, v. 1553-1564,” in: Penser les dieux avec les Présocratiques, ed. R. Saetta Cottone, Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm 2021, p. 209-226.
[Emp. p. 217: B 111.]
Steel, Carlos (ed.], Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum, with a new critical edition of the Greek text by Oliver Primavesi, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
[B 17, B 21, B 22, B 96, B 98.]
Stehle, Eva, “The addressees of Empedokles, Katharmoi Fr. B 112: Performance and moral implications,” Ancient Philosophy, 25, 2, 2005, p. 247-272.
[B 21, B 23, B 112.1-5, B 115, B 128, B 131, B 132, B 134, B 146, B 147.]
Steiger, Kornél, “The cosmology of Parmenides and Empedocles,” Homonoia, 2, 1980, p. 159-165 [Summary of a PhD thesis. P. 15-16?? instead of 159-165?.]
– Parmenidész Empedoklész töredékei. Parmenidész és Empedoklész kozmológiája, Budapest: Gondolat 1985. Reprint in Budapest: Áron Kiadó 1998.
– “Die Kosmologie des Parmenides und Empedocles,” Oikumene, 5, 1986, p. 173-236.
Stein, Heinrich, Markus, Empedoclis Agrigentini Fragmenta. Disposuit recensuit adnotavit H.S., Bonn: Adolph Marcus 1852.
[[ + ].]
– “Zu Empedokles,” Philologus, 15, 1860, p. 143-146.
[B 160.]
Stein, Paulus, TERAS, diss. Marpurgi Cattorum, 1909.
[P. 16, n. 1: Plut. Mor. 1123 B = DK 31 ad B 60: in the text a rare form τεράσμασιν should be read, a parallel is Aesch. Agam. 125: τερᾴζω.]
Steiner, Deborah Tarn, Statues in archaic and classical Greek literature and thought, Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press 2001.
[P. 140-141. It is necessary to read in B 62.8 enopen, ‘voice’.]
Steinhart, Karl Heinz August, Meletemata Plotiniana, Numburgi 1840, Halis 1840.
[For both editions, same text p. 57-60: ‘Epimetron, loci duo Parmenidei, tres Empedoclei emendati’. Emp.: p. 59-60, B 3.9-13, B 90, B 111.8.]
– “ Empedokles,” in: Allgemeine Encyklopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste, ed. von J. S. Ersch & J. G. Gruber, Leipzig: F. Brockhaus 1840, Band I, 34, p. 83-105.
Steiris, Georgios, “Pico della Mirandola and the Pre-Socratics,” in: Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy, 70, ed. K. Boudouris, Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center 2018, p. 27-37.
Stengel, Paul, “Σπονδὰς τέμνειν,” Berliner philologisch Wochenschrift, 39, 1907, p. 1247-1248.
[B 143.]
Stern, Samuel Miklos, “Anbaduḳlīs,” in: Encyclopédie de l’Islam, Leiden-London: Brill 19602 (19863), I.498 (I.483-484).
https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopedie-de-l-islam/alphaRange/Ah%20-%20An/A?s.start=560
[Stern says: “forme arabe du nom d’Empédocle (souvent corrompue en Abīduḳlīs, etc.). Les Arabes ont reçu quelqu’information authentique sur ses doctrines par l’intermédiaire, notamment, des ouvrages d’Aristote, de la doxographie du Pseudo-Plutarque (par ex. I, 3, cf. éd. Badawī, également citée dans Abū Sulaymān al-Manṭiḳī, Ṣiwān al-ḥikma, introduction; al-Maḳdisī, al-Badʾ, I, 139, II, 75), etc. L’authentique Empédocle ne joue cependant aucun rôle dans la philosophie islamique […]”.]
– “Ibn Masarra, follower of Pseudo-Empedocles: An Illusion,” in: Actas do 4. Congresso de Estudos Árabes e Islâmicos, Coimbra-Lisboa 1968, Leiden 1971, p. 325- 337.
Stettner, Walter, Die Seelenwanderung bei Griechen und Römern, Stuttgart - Berlin: W. Kohlhammer 1934, (Tübinger Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft, 22).
[P. 19-31. Emp. daimonology: B 115, B 117, B 118 etc.]
Stevens, Annick, “La physique d’Empédocle selon Simplicius,” Revue Belge de philologie et d’histoire, 67, 1989, p. 65-74.
[An instructive article on the logic of Simplicius’ interpretation of Empedocles. No doubt, the views of Simplicius are biased with his neoplatonic position, but the author believes they are coherent, interesting and relatively near to the real doctrine of Empedocles. S. was more precise and informative than Aristotle.]
Stokes, Michael C., One and many in Presocratic philosophy, Washington: Harvard University Press 1971.
[Chap. 6: Emp., p. 153-174. B 17, B 22, B 26, B 62, etc.]
Strauss Clay, Jenny, “Review of Empedokles Physika I - Eine Rekonstruktion, by Oliver Primavesi,” Religious Studies Review, 37, 1, 2011, p. 52.
– “Commencing cosmogony and the rhetoric of poetic authority,” in: Cosmologies et cosmogonies dans la littérature antique, ed. P. Derron, Vandoeuvres: Fondation Hardt 2015, (Entretiens sur L'Antiquité classique, 61), p. 105-137.
[Emp.: p. 125-134.]
– “Hesiod reads Empedocles,” in: Hesiod and the beginnings of Greek philosophy, ed. L. Iribarren & H. Koning, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2022, (Mnemosyne supplements, 455), p. 198-217.
[B 3, B 6, B 17, B 21, B 23, B 111, B 115, B 129, B 131, B 146.]
Stratton, George, Malcom, Theophrastus and the Greek physiological psychology before Aristotle, London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1917, New York: MacMillan, 1917.
Stroumsa Guy G, “Review of Ancient philosophy, mystery, and magic- Empedocles and Pythagorean tradition by Peter Kingsley,” Numen, 44, 2, 1997.
Stroumsa, Sarah I., “Review of D. de Smet, Empedocles Arabus,” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 122, January 2002, p. 94-97.
Struve, Karl Ludwig, De elementis Empedoclis dissertatio, Tartu (Dorpat): M. G. Grenz, typographi academici 1805.
[B 6.]
Stuhr, John, J., “The permanence of change: Empedocles, Dewey, and two kinds of pluralist metaphysics of force,” Cognitio (São Paulo), 17, 2, 2016, p. 349-362.
Sturz, Friedrich Wilhelm, “Animadversionum in Empedoclis carmina specimen I,” in: Commentarii societatis philologicae Lipsiensis, 1, 1, 1801, p. 24-34.
[B 25, B 28, B 63, B 65, B 78, B 93, B 101 etc.]
– Animadversionum in Empedoclis carmina specimen II,” in: Commentarii societatis philologicae Lipsiensis, 1, 2, 1801, p. 262-274.
[B 25, B 28, B 63, B 65, B 78, B 93, B 101 etc.]
– Empedocles Agrigentinus. De vita et philosophia eius exposuit, carminum reliquias ex antiquis scriptoribus collegit, recensuit, illustravit, praefationem et indices adiecit M. Frider. Guil. Sturz, Leipzig: Göschen 1805. [+ +].]
Suárez de la Torre, Emilio, “La noción de “daimon” en la literatura de la Grecia arcaica y clásica,” in: Seres intermedios: ángeles, demonios y genios en el mundo mediterráneo, ed. G. C. Andreotti & A. P. Jiménez, Malaga: Ediciones Clásicas 2000, p. 47-87.
[B 115.]
Sulzberger, Max-Raymond, “La Physique d’Empédocle,” in: Mélanges Bidez (= Annuaire de l’Institut de philologie et d’histoire orientales, 2), Brussels 1934, p. 913-915.
Susemihl, Franz, “Über das Verhältnis des Gorgias zum Empedokles,” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik, 26, 73, 1856, p. 40-42.
– “103. Kleine Beiträge zur griechischen Literaturgeschichte. 5. Gorgias und die attische prosa,” Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Pädagogik, 115, 1877, p. 793-799.
Suzuki, M., “Preface to Empedocles,” Journal of Classical Studies, 25, 1977, p. 20-31.
[B 17.8, B 20.2-5; japanic, abstract in English.]
Svenbro, Jesper, “Voir en voyant. La perception visuelle chez Empédocle,” Métis, N. S. 2, 2004, p. 47-70.
[B 84, B 88, B 17.21.]
Sweeney, Leo, s. j., Infinity in the Presocratics: a bibliographical and philosophical study, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1972.
[Emp.: p. 137-144.]
Świercz, Piotr, “Problematyka arche/archai w kosmogoniach orfickich w świetle filozofii Heraklita z Efezu, Empedoklesa z Akragas i nurtu pitagorejskiego,” Littera Antiqua, 1, 2010, p. 106-121.
http://www.litant.eu/artykuly/nr1/LA%201.pdf
Sydenham, Humphrey, Sermons upon solemne occasions preached in severall auditories, London: John Beale 1637.
[Marginalia p. 135: Empedocles associated with “God was an intelligible Spheare”.]
Symonds, John, Addington, Studies of the Greek poets, 1873. (Several reprints).
[P. 37-64; 2nd edition: p. 38 ss.; 3rd edition 1893: p. 191-219; New York-London: Harper & Brothers 1918: Empedocles, p. 207-235.]
Szabó, A., “Le scienze in Magna Grecia,” in: Megale Hellas, ed. G. Pugliese Carratelli, Milan: Scheiwiller 1983, p. 555-584.
Taeger, Fritz, “Isokrates und die Anfänge des Hellenistischen Herrscherkultes,” Hermes, 72, 1937, p. 355-360.
[On Emp. as a god, B 112.4.]
Taillardat, Jean, “Le sens d’“amorgos” (Empédocle, fr. 84 Diels) et les lanternes dans l’antiquité,” Revue des études grecques, 72, 1959, p. xi-xii.
[B 84.]
Tamagnone, Carlo, “Empedocle,” in: Ateismo filosofico nel mondo antico. Religione, naturalismo, materialismo, atomismo, scienza: la nascita della filosofia atea, Firenze: Clinamen 2005, (Il diforàno, 13), p. 108-117.
Tamás, Ábel, “Reading Ovid reading Horace. The Empedoclean drive in the Ars Poetica,” Materiali e discussioni, 72, 2014, p. 173-192.
Tanga, Fabio, “Il 'De exilio' di Plutarco nella traduzione latina di Angelo Barbato,” in: Charis. Studi offerti a Paola Volpe dai suoi allievi, ed. Stefano Amendola & Giovanna Pace, Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste 2016, (Graeca Tergestina. Praelectiones Philologiae Tergestinae, 7), p. 95-110.
– “Esule-Isola: Esilio ed insularità nel De exilio di Plutarco,” in: Plutarco y la insularidad: XIV Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas, ed. M. J. Martínez Benavides & L. M. Pino Campos, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas 2022, p. 165-176.
[B 115.]
Tankha, Vijay, “Chap. 7 Empedocles of Agragas,” in: Ancient Greek philosophy: Thales to Gorgias, New Dehli: Dorling Kindersley (Pearson Education - Longman) 2006, p. 187-223.
[Second edition in 2014 (408 pages vs 351) with the title Ancient Greek philosophy: Thales to Socrates. Emp.: p. 187-223.]
Tannery, Paul, “La cosmogonie d´Empédocle,” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 24, 2, 1887, p. 285-300.
– Pour l’histoire de la science hellène. De Thalès à Empédocle, Paris: Félix Alcan 1887, (Collection historique des grands philosophes). Paris: Gauthier-Villars 19302. Reprint in Sceaux: Jacques Gabay 1990. Reprint (and revised) in Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2022 (Encre Marine).
[Emp.: p. 304-339 in 1887. [ + ]. Emp.: p. 313-347 in 1930. [ + ]. Emp.: p. 313-347 in 1990.]
– “fragments des médecins grecs,” in: P. Tannery, Mémoires scientifiques IX: Philologie, 1880-1928, Toulouse: Privat - Paris: Gauthier-Villars 1929, p. 299-309.
[P. 306-307: B 100.]
Тантлевский, И. Р, (Tantlevskij, Igor), “A worldview dialogue or parallel development of thought: ancient parallels to the book of Qoheleth 12.7,” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 17, 1, 2023, p. 340-350.
[B 8, B 9, B 11, B 15. For just Empedocles: not developed… not useful…]
Tarán, Leonardo, Parmenides, Princeton University Press 1965.
– “The text of Simplicius’ commentary on Aristotle’s physics,” in: Simplicius. Sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie. Actes du colloque international de Paris (28 sept. - 1 er oct. 1985), ed. I. Hadot, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter 1987, (Peripatoi; 15), p. 246-266. (Reprint in Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013.)
Tarán, Leonardo & Dimitri Gutas (ed.), Aristotle. Poetics, Editio maior of the Greek text with historical introductions and philological commentaries by L. T. and D. G., Leiden-Boston: Brill 2012, (Mnemosyne, 338).
[Emp.: B 100, B 138, B 143.]
Tarrant, Dorothy, “Aristophanes, Birds 700,” The Classical Review, 37, 5/6, 1923, p. 113.
Tarrant, Harold, “Salvation from God in the De mundo and Numenius,” in: The idea of salvation: papers from the conference on the idea of salvation, sacred and secular, held at St. Paul’s College, University of Sydney, 22-25 August, 1986, Auckland: University of Auckland 1988, p. 24-30. (= Prudentia 20, 1988, Suppl.)
Tate, J., “Review of H.S. Long, A study of the doctrine of metempsychosis in Greece from Pythagoras to Plato,” The Classical Review, 64, 1, 1950, p. 34.
[B 115]
– “Empedocles as animist, Jean Zafiropulo: Empédocle d’Agrigente,” The Classical Review, 5, 1, 1955, p. 48-50.
Tatum, W. Jeffrey, “The Presocratics in Book One of Lucretius’ De rerum natura,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 114, 1984, p. 177-189.
[On Lucretius’ handling with Presocratics, especially with Emp.]
Taylor, Alfred, Edward, “The words εἶδος, ἰδέα in pre-platonic literature,” in: Varia Socratica, first series, Oxford: James Parker & Co. 1911, p. 178-267.
– A commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1928.
Ten Brink, Bernard, “Empedoclea,” Philologus, 6, 1851, p. 730-734.
[B 6.]
Tennemann, Wilhelm Gottlieb & Amadeus Wendt, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie für den akademischen Unterricht, 2n ed. (1816), 4th ed. (1825), 5th ed. Leipzig 1829.
[Emp.: p. 58-59 in 1816, p. 91-93 in 1829. French translation of the 5th ed. is Victor Cousin, Manuel de l’histoire de la philosophie, Tome I, Paris 1829. Empédocle: p. 112-125.]
– Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie bis auf Sokrates, Leipzig 1829.
[Empedocles: p. 275-318.]
– A manual of the history of philosophy. Translated by Rev. A. Johnson, revised and enlarged by T. R. Morell, London: H. G. Bohn 1852, (Bohn’s philological library).
Teodorsson, Sven-Tage, A commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, I, (Books 1-3), Göteborg: Acta universitatis gothoburgensis 1989, (Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia, 51).
Thein, Karel, “The Presocratics, Plato, and Aristotle’s biology,” in: The Cambridge companion to Aristotle’s biology, ed. S. M. Connell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021.
[A 81. Two cosmic periods, double zoogony.]
Therme, Anne-Laure, (2007) “Est-ce par un tourbillon que l’amour empédocléen joint ? L’hypothèse de l’aimantation,” Philosophie antique, 7, 2007, p. 91-119.
[A 50, A 86, A 87, A 88, A 89, B 17, B 22, B 27, B 35, B 75, B 89, B 91, B 109, B 110.]
– (2008) Les principes du devenir cosmique chez Empédocle d’Agrigente et Anaxagore de Clazomène à partir de leur critique aristotélicienne, diss., Université Paris I, 2008.
– (2010) “Une tragédie cosmique : l’exil amnésique des daimones d’Empédocle,” in: Rationalité tragique, ed. S. Alexandre et O. Renaut, Zetesis - Actes des colloques de l’association [on line], 1, 2010, p. 1-29.
https://zetesis.hypotheses.org/rationalite-tragique, 5 septembre 2010.
https://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/3211/files/2015/04/1Therme.pdf
[B 115, B 117.]
– (2012) “Empédocle,” in: Lire les présocratiques, ed. L. Brisson – A. Mace & A.L. Therme, Paris: PUF 2012, p. 167-181.
[= chap. VII. (B 8, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 27, B 27a, B 34, B 35, B 73, B 84, B 86, B 91, B 96.]
– (2013) “Une relecture de la double zoogonie empédocléenne : que sont les oulophueis tupoi du fragment 62 ?,” in: La Sagesse « présocratique ». Communication des savoirs en Grèce archaïque : des lieux et des hommes, ed. M.-L. Desclos & F. Fronterotta, Paris: Armand Colin 2013, p. 149-165.
[B 62.]
– (2014) “Des racines empédocléennes chez Platon ? Échos critiques à Empédocle dans l’élaboration platonicienne de l’âme,” Études platoniciennes, 11, 2014, p. 1-33.
http://etudesplatoniciennes.revues.org/528
– (2016) Empédocle, France-Culture, 24 novembre 2016,
https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/les-nouveaux-chemins-de-la-connaissance/la-pensee-avant-socrate-44-empedocle
– (2017) “Figures présocratiques de l’enfant. La συμμετρία et le jeu,” Archives de philosophie, 80, 4, 2017, p. 633-657.
[B 6, B 100, B 143.]
– (2018) “Review of X. Gheerbrant, Empédocle : une poésie philosophique,” Philosophie antique, 18, 2018, p. 281-283.
– (2018) “Φιλία et δίκη dans les fragments présocratiques,” in: Philia et Dikè. Aspects du lien social et politique en Grèce ancienne, ed. A. Jaulin, M. Crubellier & P. Pellegrin, Paris: Classiques Garnier 2018, (Kaïnon - Anthropologie de la pensée ancienne, n° 10; Symposia, 1), p. 169-190.
[B 21, B 17, B 22, B 33, B 87, B 96.]
– (2021) “Héphaïstos dans les forges de Cypris : La fonte des bronzes vivants d’Empédocle,” Philosophie antique, 21 (Les éléments), 2021, p. 87-117.
[B 57, B 61, B 96, B 98.]
– (2023) “Les vivants, empreintes de leur biotope (Anaximandre, Démocrite),” Cahiers Philosophiques, 172, 1, 2023, p. 11-24.
[A 70, A 72, A 73, A 77, B 20, B 62, B 66, B 81, B 84, B 126.]
– (2024) “Arborescences, pousses et bourgeons humains dans les zoogonies et l’embryologie présocratiques,” in: L’humain et le végétal. Processus et formes de vie partagés, ed. Sarah Carvallo & Arnaud Macé, Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté 2024, (Sciences : concepts et problèmes), p. 49-65.
[A 70, A 72, A 74, A 75, A 79, A 83, A 84, B 17, B 21, B 27, B 29, B 35, B 57, B 61, B 62, B 79, B 82, B 99, B 100, B 105, B 127, 152W.]
Thibodeau, Philip, The chronology of the early Greek natural Philosophers, North Haven (Connecticut): Cosmographia.net 2019.
http://www.cosmographia.net
https://www.cosmographia.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/THE-CHRONOLOGY-OF-THE-EARLY-GREEK-NATURAL-PHILOSOPHERS.pdf
[Biographical chronology. The vital dates of all known pre-Aristotelian Greek natural philosophers. Emp. p. 177-187. Dates for Emp.: birth in 496 – death in 436.]
Thiele, Georg, “Zu den vier Elementen des Empedokles,” Hermes, 32, 1897, p. 68-78.
[B 6.]
Thillet, Pierre, Aristote. De l'âme. Traduit du grec par P. T., édition établie, présentée et annotée par P. T., Paris: Gallimard 2005, (Folio essais, 448).
– Aristote. Météorologiques. Traduit du grec par P. T., édition établie, présentée et annotée par P. T., Paris: Gallimard 2008, (Tel, 356).
Thivel, Antoine, “Eryximaque et le principe des contraires,” Cuadernos de Filología Clásica, Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos, 14, 2004, p. 35-44.
http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/revistas/fll/11319070/articulos/CFCG0404110035A.PDF
[Influence of Empedocles on Eryximaque. Like to like and opposites (Heraclitus).]
Thomas, Hellmuth Paul Fritz, Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Empedokles, diss., Leipzig 1924.
Thomas, Hans Werner, EPEKEINA: Untersuchungen über das Überlieferungsgut in den Jenseitsmythen Platons, diss., München 1938.
Thompson, W. H., The Phaedrus of Plato, with English notes and dissertations, London: Whittaker & Co., George Bell 1868, (Bibliotheca classica).
[248 E, p. 54. B 115.]
Thomson, Iain, “Interpretation as self-creation: Nietzsche on the Pre-Platonics,” Ancient philosophy, 23, 2003, p. 195-213.
Tiedemann, Dieterich, “System des Empedokles,” Göttingisches Magazin der Wissenschaften und Litteratur, 2, IV, 1781, p. 38-71.
http://www.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/diglib/aufklaerung/suche.htm
http://ds.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/viewer/image/1923578_004/1/LOG_0003/
– Geist der spekulativen Philosophie von Thales bis Sokrates, Marburg 1791, p. 242-262.
Tigner, Steven S., “Empedocles’ Twirled Ladle and the Vortex-Supported Earth,” Isis, 65, 1974, p. 433-447.
[A 671, B 26, B 35, B 115.]
– “Some LSJ Addenda and Corrigenda,” Glotta, 52, 3/4, 1974, p. 192-206.
[A 51, A 56, B 6.1, B 8.3, B 17.10,17,21,26,30, B 20.6, B 21.4,6, B 26.9, B 27.4, B 28.2, B 35.12,15, B 48, B 62.4.]
Tilliette, Xavier, “Empédocle, le héros tragique de Hölderlin,” Gregorianum, 80, 3, 1999, p. 525-538.
Timotin, Andrei, La démonologie platonicienne, Histoire de la notion de daimôn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2012. (Philosophia Antiqua 128).
[B 59, B 112, B 115, B 122, B 126, B 146.]
Timpanaro Cardini, Maria, “Respirazione e clessidra,” La Parola del Passato, 12, 1957, p. 250-270.
[B 100.]
– “La clessidra di Empedocle e l’esperienza di Torricelli,” in: Convegno di studi Torricelliani in occasione del 350. anniversario della nascita di Evangelista Torricelli 1958, Faenza 1959, p. 151-156.
[B 100.]
– “La zoogonia di Empedocle e la critica aristotlelica,” Physis, 2, 1960, p. 5-13.
[B 60.]
– Pseudo-Aristotle De lineis inscecabilibus, Varese 1970.
– “Problemi attuali di scienza e di cultura,” Rendiconti della classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche dell’Accademia dei Lincei, 154, 1973, p. 65-70.
Tiraqueau, André (Tiraquellus Andrea), Commentarii de nobilitate, et jure primigeniorum, Paris: Jacob Kerver 1549.
[P. 104, 107, 123, 125, 136, 140, 164, 193, 196, 204. A short biography of Emp. life; meaningless.]
Tischer, Hermann, “Quaestionum Empedoclearum specimen scripsit Dr. H. T.,” in: Programm, durch welches zu den am Schlusse des Schuljahrs Ostern 1842 bis Ostern 1843 den 6. und 7. April 1843 bei dem Gymnasium zu Luckau Statt findenden Schulfeyerlichkeiten im Namen seiner Amtsgenossen ehrerbietigst einladet G. Kreyenberg, Gymnasii Director, Luckau: J. Entleutner 1843, p. 1-28.
[P. 3-17: Empedoclis carmina ad quam usque aetatem servata vel potius lectitata esse integra videantur; p. 17-28: De locis quibusdam Empedoclis primariis. B 17. Sometimes wrongly mentioned under the name “Fischer”, see Bodrero for instance.]
Tkatsch, Jaroslaus, Die arabische Übersetzung der Poetik des Aristoteles, und die Grundlage der Kritik des griechischen Textes, I, Wien – Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky 1928.
[P. 266-267: B 138, B 143.]
– Die arabische Übersetzung der Poetik des Aristoteles, und die Grundlage der Kritik des griechischen Textes, II, aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von A. Gudeman und Th. Seif, Wien – Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky 1932.
[P. 18: B 138, B 143. P. 128 - 131: B 35.15.]
Todoua, Maïa, “Empédocle : Empêche-vents ou Dompteur des mauvais génies ? Réflexions autour du fr. 111 Diels-Kranz,” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 1, 2005, p. 49-81.
[B 111, B 112, B 115, d 3-4 MP.]
– La conception de la Genèse dans la philosophie présocratique : Parménide et Empédocle, diss. Université Paris IV - Sorbonne, 2005.
[B 8, B 9, B 11, B 12, B 15, B 17, B 35, B 57, B 58, B 59, B 60, B 61, B 62, B 115.]
Tonelli, Angelo, Empedocle di Agrigento. Frammenti e testimonianze, Origini, Purificazioni, con i frammenti del Papiro di Strasburgo, Milan: Bompiani 2002.
[[+ +].]
– “Cosmogony is psychogony is ethics: Some thoughts about Empedocles’ fragments 17; 110; 115; 134 DK, and P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665 - 1666D, VV. 1-9,” in: The Empedoclean Κόσμος: S[t]ructure, process and the question of cyclicity. Proceedings of the Symposium Philosophiae Antiquae Tertium Myconense, July 6th - July 13th, 2003, Patras, ed. A. L. Pierris, Institute for Philosophical Research, 2005, p. 309-330.
Tonnelat, Ernest, L’œuvre poétique et la pensée religieuse de Hölderlin, Paris: Didier 1950.
[Emp. : p. 309-362.]
Tor, Shaul, “6.2 The daimôn and Muse of Empedocles,” in: S. Tor, Mortal and divine in early Greek epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017, p. 318-339.
[B 2, B 3, B 11, B 17, B 21, B 62, B 106, B 108, B 115, B 117, B 127, B 129, B 131, B 139, d MP.]
– “Empedocles the wandering daimōn and trusting in mad Strife,” Phronesis, 2022, 28 Nov. online ahead of print p. 1-30, Phronesis, 68, 1, 2023, p. 1-30.
[A 46, B 2, B 3, B 4, B 11, B 17, B 20, B 21, B 22, B 26, B 27, B 35, B 62, B 71, B 75, B 95, B 109, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 113, B 115, B 117, B 120, B 122, B 124, B 126, B 127, B 128, B 129, B 130, B 131, B 136, B 137, B 139, B 145, B 146, d 5-6 MP.]
– “Early Greek Philosophy,” Phronesis, 70, 2025, p. 119-127.
[Review of books in the section “Book Notes”. Review of Picot, Empédocle. Sur le chemin des dieux : p. 122-123.]
Torres Guerra, José Bernardino (ed.), Lucius Annaeus Cornutus. Compendium de graecae theologiae traditionibus, recensuit José B. Torres, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2018, (Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, 2027).
[P. 25: Emp. B 123.]
Tortorelli, Marisa: see Ghidini - Tortorelli, Marisa,
Tourney, Garfield, “Empedocles and Freud, Heraclitus and Jung,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 30, 1956, p. 109-123.
[This study is quite useless for Empedoclean studies.]
Trabattoni, Franco, Empedocle - I frammenti: sulla natura, purificazioni, con testo greco a fronte, trad. di F. T., Milan: Marcos y Marcos 1987, (I presocratici, 3). Reprint in 1991.
[[ + ].]
Traglia, Antonio, Riflessi omerici nei frammenti di Empedocle, Pescara: Arte della Stampa di L. Stracca 1931.
[p. 85-96: B 6.]
– Studi sulla lingua di Empedocle, Bari: Adriatica Editrice 1952, (Mousikai dialektoi, V-3).
– “Breve rassegna di studi Empedoclei,” Atene e Roma, 1, 4.2, 1952, p. 151-154.
– “Reminiscenze empedoclee nei ‘Fenomeni’ di Arato,” in: Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di A. Rostagni, Torino: Bottega d’Erasmo 1963, p. 382-393.
[B 17, B 27, B 28, B 35, B 128.]
– “Empedoclea,” Cultura e scuola, 17, 65, 1978, p. 47-54.
Trépanier, Simon, (2000) “The structure of Empedocles’ fragment 17,” in: Essays in Philosophy, 1/1, 2000, p. 2-16.
http://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=eip
[B 17.]
– (2001) Empedocles. An interpretation, diss., Philosophy and Classics, University of Toronto, 2001.
– (2003) “‘We’ and Empedocles cosmic lottery: P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1165 - 1666, ensemble a,” Mnemosyne, 56, 4, 2003, p. 385-419.
[(a) MP.]
– “(2003) Empedocles on the ultimate symmetry of the world,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24, 2003, p. 1-57.
[(a (i), a (ii), d, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 26, B 35, B 98, B 109, B 124.]
– (2004) “Empédocle: Les pommes de la discorde,” Phoenix, 58, 1, 2004, p. 131-142.
[Review article/Discussion. (1) Empédocle. Les Purifications, par J. Bollack, 2003. (2) Aevum antiquum, N .S. 1 Forum-Sul nuovo Empedocle, 2001.]
– (2004) Empedocles. An interpretation, New York-London: Routledge 2004, (Studies in classics, 2).
– (2007) “The didactic plot of Lucretius' De rerum natura and its Empedoclean model,” in: Greek and Roman philosophy 100 BC-200 AD. Vol. I, ed. R. Sorabji & R. W. Sharples, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 94, London: Institute of Classical Studies, University of London, 2007, p. 243-282.
[Influence of Lucretius on “the New Empedocles”, i. e. Papyrus Strasbourg.]
– (2008) “Review of Rossetti (L.), Santaniello (C.), Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle,” The Classical Review, 58.1, 2008, p. 6-7.
– (2008) “Empedocles,” in: New Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 2, Detroit / New York / [etc.]: Thomson - Gale 2008, p. 395-398.
– (2009) “Review of Rosenfeld-Löffler, Annette, La poétique d'Empédocle: cosmologie et métaphore, Bern - Oxford: P. Lang 2006,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 129, 2009, p. 228-229.
– (2010) “Early Greek theology: God as nature and natural Gods,” in: The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and transformations, ed. Jan N. Bremmer & Andrew Erskine, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2010, (Edinburgh Leventis Studies, 5), p. 273-317.
[Emp.: p. 302-308. B 21, B 112, B 115, B 134, B 146.]
– (2014) “From wandering limbs to limbless gods: δαίμων as substance in Empedocles,” Apeiron, 47, 2, 2014, p. 172-210.
[B 29, B 59, B 115, B 134, c MP.]
– (2017) “From Hades to the stars: Empedocles on the cosmic habitats of soul,” Classical Antiquity, 36, 1, 2017, p. 130-182.
[B 2, B 6, B 9, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 111, B 115, B 118, B 120, B 121, B 126, B 134, B 135, B 139, B 142, B 146, B 147.]
– (2017) “Empedocles, On Nature 1.273-287, place, the elements, and still no ‘We’,” Mnemosyne, 70, 4, 2017, p. 562-584.
[a(ii) 3-17.]
– (2018) “Empedocles, the love poet - Review of X. Gheerbrant, Empédocle : une poétique philosophique,” The Classical Review, 68, 2, 2018, p. 342-344.
– (2019) “Empedocles on the origin of plants: PStrasb. gr. inv. 1665-1666, Sections d, b, and f,” in: Presocratics and papyrological tradition. A philosophical reappraisal of the sources, Proceedings of the International Workshop held at the University of Trier (22–24 September 2016), ed. Ch. Vassallo, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2019, (Studia Praesocratica, 10), p. 271-297.
[A 30, A 70, A 72, B 9, B 17, B 20, B 30, B 53, B 62, B 73, B 75, B 76, B 83, B 84, B 86, B 96, B 98, B 115, B 118, B 121, B 139, B 153b, B 154, d MP, b MP, f MP.]
– (2019) “Review of X. Gheerbrant, Empédocle, une poétique philosophique, 2016,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 117, 1, 2019, p. 155-158.
– (2020) “The spirit in the flesh: Empedocles on embodied soul,” in: Heat, pneuma, and soul in ancient philosophy and science, ed. Hynek Bartoš & Colin Guthrie King, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2020, p. 80-105.
[A 85/text 4 Vítek, B 2, B 9, B 17, B 100, B 105, B 106, B 115, B 128, B 133, B 134.]
– (2021) “The soul and the celestial afterlife in Greek philosophy before Plato,” in: Immortality in ancient philosophy, ed. A. G. Long, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press 2021, p. 12-40.
[A 62, B 8, B 9, B 23, B 26, B 59, B 112, B 115, B 118, B 121, B 126, B 134, B 138, B 146, a(ii) 2 MP.]
– (2024) “Review of R. Saetta Cottone, Soleil et connaissance. Empédocle avant Platon,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review, BMCR 2024.06.07, 2024, https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2024/2024.06.07/
Tricot, Jules (transl.), Aristote. Traité du ciel, suivi traité pseudo-aristotélicien Du monde, traduction et notes, Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin 1949.
– Aristote. De la génération et de la corruption. Traduction nouvelle, et notes, Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin 1951.
– Aristote. Parva naturalia, (De Sensu, de Memoria [...] de Vita et Morte), suivis du traité pseudo-aristotélicien De Spiritu, Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin 1951.
– Aristote. La Métaphysique, Tome I. Nouvelle édition entièrement refondue avec commentaire, Paris: J. Vrin 1966, (Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques).
[Books I-VII.]
– Aristote. La Métaphysique, Tome II. Nouvelle édition entièrement refondue avec commentaire, Paris: J. Vrin 1966, (Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques).
[Books VIII-XIV.]
Trindade Santos, José Gabriel, “Vita e morte, amore e contesa in Empedocle,” in: Empedocle: tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. G. Casertano, Napoli: Loffredo 2007, p. 108-121.
Trompoukis, Constantinos & Dimitrios Kourkoutas, “Greek mythology: the eye, ophthalmology, eye disease, and blindness,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2007, 2007, 42, p. 455-459.
Tsantsanoglou Kyriakos et al., The Derveni Papyrus, Firenze: Leo S. Olschki 2006, (Studi e testi per il corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, 13).
[B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 27, B 29, B 38, B 71, B 96, B 134.]
Tsimbidaros, Ilias, “Cosmogonie et poésie divinatoire chez Empédocle : À propos du papyrus de Strasbourg,” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 28, 2, 2010, p. 33-47.
– “Le double dit. L’ambiguïté de la naissance et de la mort chez Empédocle (Strasb. d, Diels 17, 3-4; 26, 5-7, 118-121),” Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 29, 1, 2011, p. 3-28.
[B 6, B 9, B 17, B 20, B 23, B 24, B 25, B 26, B 35, B 115, B 118, B 120, B 121, B 125.]
Tucker, G. M., “Empedocles in exile,” The Classical Review, 45, 1931, p. 49-51.
[B 112.3.]
Tumino, Giuseppe, “Mito e scienza nei poemi di Empedocle,” in: Die Kraft der Vergangenheit. Mythos und Realität der klassischen Kultur, Akten der deutsch-italienischen Tagung des Centrum Latinatatis Europae, Berlin, 29-30 November 2003, ed. G. Ugolini, Hildesheim - Zurich - New York: Georg Olms 2005, (Altertumswissenschaftliche Texte und Studien, 39), p. 147-158.
[B 6. Tears as rain drops.]
Туренко В. Е. (Turenko, Vitali), “Феномен любові у ранніх давньогрецьких філософів: від міфу до логосу,” Гуманітарні студії. 21, 2014, p. 93-100. (= “The phenomenon of love in the early ancient Greek philosophers: from myth to logos,” in: Humanitarian Studies, 21, 2014, р. 93-100.)
– “Епіменід vs Емпедокл: як ранні давньогрецькі філософи боролися з пандеміями,” Філософська думка, 4, p. 39-49. (= Epimenides vs Empedocles: how early Greek philosophers fought еpidemics, in: Filosofska dumka, 4, 2020, p. 39-49.
https://dumka.philosophy.ua/index.php/fd/article/view/478
– ‘Vocabulary of φιλία in the Hesiodian works,’ - 280-Chapter Manuscript-16005-1-10-2022.
Tzamalikos, Panayiotis, Anaxagoras, Origen, and Neoplatonism: The legacy of Anaxagoras to classical and late Antiquity I, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2016, (Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte, 128.1).
[B 6, B 12 supposed to be by Anaxagoras, B 117 with full references including George Cedrenus, B 127. Achilles Tatius (Isagoga Excerpta, 3) about τὰ τέσσαρα στοιχεῖα, καὶ τὸ μὲν πῦρ καλεῖ Δία καὶ αἰθέρα. Sphaerus. Love and Strife. 1814 pages. Learned.]
– Guilty of Genius: Origen and the theory of transmigration, New York: Peter Lang 2022.
– Origen and Hellenism: the interplay between Greek and Christian ideas in late Antiquity, Peter Lang 2022.
Tzavaras [Τζαβάρας], Giannes [Γιάννη], Ἡ ποίηση τοῦ Ἐμπεδοκλῆ: κείμενο, μετάφραση, σχόλια, Ἀθήνα -Γιάννινα: Δωδώνη 1988.
– “Πυθαγόρειες επιδράσεις στη φιλοσοφία του Εμπεδοκλή,” in: Πυθαγόρεια φιλοσοφία, ed. K. Boudouris, Athenai - Samos: Εκδόσεις του Διεθνούς Κέντρου Ελληνικής Φιλοσοφίας 1992, p. 189-194.
– “Ἕνα καινούριο ἀπόσπασμα ἀπὸ τὴν ποίηση τοῦ Ἐμπεδοκλῆ,” Ἑλληνικὴ Φιλοσοφικὴ Ἐπιθεώρηση, 18, 2001, p. 45-57.
Tzetzes, Joannes, Chiliades or Book of histories, English translation from the original Greek of T. Kiessling’s edition of 1826, by several authors, 2016 (free on-line).
Ueberweg, Friedrich, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, I, das Alterthum, Berlin: E. S. Mittler und Sohn 1871, 4th edition.
[18621, 18642, 18663. Ueberweg died in 1871. Emp.: § 23, p. 64-67. B 6, B 57, B 59, B 109, B 117.]
– A history of philosophy from Thales to the present time, I. History of the ancient and mediaeval philosophy, translated from the fourth German edition by Geo. S. Morris, London: Hodder and Stoughton 1871, 1872. Several reprints, with a slightly different title: History of philosophy from Thales to the present time. By Dr. F. U., Vol. I. History of the ancient and mediaeval philosophy.
[Emp.: § 23, p. 60-63. Cf. Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, I, das Alterthum, 1871; Emp.: § 23.]
Ueberweg, Friedrich & Karl Praechter, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, fortgeführt von Max Heinze, I, das Altertum, Berlin: E. S. Mittler und Sohn 1920.
[Emp.: § 23, p. 104-110. B 6, B 8, B 17, B 29, B 31, B 38, B 57, B 59, B 71, B 107, B 109, B 117, B 134, B 137.]
Unger, Georg Friedrich, “Die Zeitverhältnisse des Anaxagoras und Empedokles,” Philologus, Supplementband 4, 1884, p. 511-550 (I. Die Zeit des Anaxagoras und Empedokles; II. Empedokles als Politiker; III. Anaxagoras).
Usener, Hermann, “Kallone,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Neue Folge, 23, 1868, p. 316-377.
[B 6: p. 316-317. B 105.]
– Götternamen, Bonn: F. Cohen 1896.
[B 123.3: p. 267, n.51.]
Ustinova, Yulia, Caves and the ancient Greek mind: Descending underground in the search for ultimate truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
[Emp.: p. 209-215; A 72, B 3, B 35, B 57, B 61, B 111, B 112, B 120.]
Vahlen, Jan, Jacob, “Eine Miscelle zu Aristoteles Poetik,” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien, 24, 1873, p. 658-659.
Valdevit, Rosamaria, “Note sulla teologia dello scritto pseudo-aristotelico De mundo,” Studi italiani di filologia classica 4, 1986, p. 29-41.
[The appendix of the study involves an analysis of Ps.-Aristotle handling with Emp. in 5. book De mundo.]
Vamvacas, Constantine J. (Κωνσταντίνος Βαμβακάς), “Empedocles of Acragas (ca. 494-434 B.C.),” in: C. J. Vamvacas, The founders of Western thought – The Presocratics: A diachronic parallelism between Presocratic thought and philosophy and the natural sciences, Springer 2009, (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 257), p. 167-196. First version in Προσωκρατικοί: Οι θεμελιωτές της δυτικής σκέψης, Heraklion: Crete University Press 2001. The book has also been translated into German: Die Geburt der Philosophie. Der vorsokratische Geist als Begründer von Philosophie und Naturwissenschaften, Düsseldorf: Artemis & Winkler 2006.
van Binsbergen, Wim, M.J., “Before the Presocratics: Cyclicity, transformation, and element cosmology, The case of transcontinental pre- or protohistoric cosmological substrates linking Africa, Eurasia and North America,” Quest: An African Journal of Philosophy/ Revue africaine de philosophie, 23-24, 1-2, special issue published on the occasion of the journal Editor’s 65th birthday, 2009-2010.
[Publication in 2012, reprint in 2015. Empedocles: p. 149-178; B 6.]
van den Es, A. H. G. P., “Empedocles,” De Nederlandsche Spectator, 2, 1880, p. 14-5, Nr. 3, p. 20-3, Nr. 4, p. 27-9, Nr. 5, p. 35-7, Nr. 9, p. 67-73, nr. 12, p. 96-99.
van der Ben, Nicolaas, (1975) The Proem of Empedocles’ Peri physios: towards a new edition of all the fragments, Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner 1975.
– (1978) “Empedocles’ fragments 8, 9, 10 DK,” Phronesis, 23, 1978, p. 197-215.
[B 8, B 9, B 10.]
– (1984) “Empedocles’ cycle and fragment 17, 3-5 DK,” Hermes, 112, 1984, p. 281-296.
[B 17.]
– (1996) “The meaning of ΓΝΩΜΑ,” Glotta, 73, 1995-1996, p. 35-55.
[B 110.10.]
– (1996) “Empedocles’ fragment 20 DK: Some Suggestions,” Mnemosyne, 4, 49, 1996, p. 281-296.
[B 20.]
– (1999) “The Strasbourg Papyrus of Empedocles: Some preliminary remarks,” Mnemosyne, 52, 1999, p. 525-544.
– (2019) Empedocles’ Poem on natural philosophy, I – A radical edition, Posthumous writings of N. van der Ben, gathered in 2018, published by Jean-Claude Picot with the help of Klaartje and Simon van der Ben, Google Sites, empedocles.acragas, 2019.
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/nicolaas-van-der-ben
[+ +]
van der Eijk, Philip, “The woman not breathing,” in: Heraclides of Pontus, vol. XV, ed. W W. Fortenbaugh & E. Pender, New Brunswick-London: Transaction Publishers 2009, p. 237-250.
[B 111.]
Van der Horst, Pieter Cornelis, Les vers d’or pythagoriciens, édités avec une introduction et un commentaire, Leyden: E.J. Brill 1932.
[B 115.]
Vandercoilden, Gilbert, Empédocle et sa conception de la nature (unpublished thèse de licence), Université de Louvain 1945.
Vanella, Giovanni, “Empedocle e la poesia di Lucrezio,” in: Estratto dall’Annuario 1960-1969 del Liceo Ginnasio Statale Pietro Giannone - Caserta. Caserta: Grafiche Russo 1969.
[Review in: L’Antiquité Classique, 39, 2, 1970. p. 600-601.]
Vangerow Wilhelm Gottlieb, Dissertatio historico-philosophica μετεμψύχωσιν Veterum sistens..., Halle: Grunert 1765.
[See L. Paquet, Y. Lafrance, Les Présocratiques [1450-1879] III, Québec: Bellarmin 1995, p. 160.]
van Goens, Rijklof Michael, Porphyrius, De antro nympharum, graece cum latina L. Holstenii versione, Traiecti ad Rhenum 1765.
[P. 9: B 96, B 120. A sketch of Emp. biography.]
van Groningen, Bernhard Abraham, “Trois notes sur Empédocle,” Mnemosyne, 9, 1956, p. 221-224.
[B 27.2, B 122-3, B 137.]
– “Le fragment 111 d’Empédocle,” Classica et Mediaevalia, 17, 1956, p. 47-61.
[B 111.]
– La composition littéraire archaïque grecque : procédés et réalisations, Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij, 1958, p. 201-222, (Nieuwe Reeks, LXV, 2).
[Chap. VII: B 24, B 35, etc.]
– “Empédocle, poète,” Mnemosyne, 24, 1971, p. 169-188.
van Herwerden, Hendrik, Quaestiunculae epicae et elegiacae, Utrecht: Kemink 1876.
[Emp.: p. 81-84. New reading of some verses edited by Karsten; B 115, B 4, B17.27-28 + B 26.1-2, B 23.9-10, B 35, B 105, B. 17.28, B 27. To my knowledge these proposals are not mentioned in modern critical apparatus.]
van Irhoven, Willem, De Palingenesia Veterum, seu, Metempsychosi Pythagorica libri III, Amsterdam: H. Vieroot 1733.
[Book 1, chap. 18, p. 164; book 2, chap. 3, p. 233-251; chap. 7, p. 326; B 8, B 9, B 11, B 109, B 111.9, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 136, B 137, B 141, B 144, B 147.]
van Kasteel, Hans, Hippolyte de Rome. Réfutation de toutes les hérésies. Introduction, traduction et notes de H.v.K., Grez-Doiceau: Beya 2019, (Beya, 25).
van Luijn, Nathasja, “The playful role of the girl in Empedocles’ B100,” Rhizomata, 9, 1, 2021, p. 27-49.
https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2021-0002
[B 100.]
van Noorden, Helen, Playing Hesiod: The ‘myth of the races’ in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge University Press 2015, (Cambridge Classical Studies).
[Emp.: p. 151-152. B 23, B 128, B 130.]
van Stégeren, D. J., “Empedocles en Darwin,” De Nederlandsche Spectator, 50, 1879, p. 398-400.
Vassallo, Christian, (2013) “Una nuova raccolta di saggi presocratici e platonici: Problemi di papirologia filosofica e di storia delle idee,” Peitho / examina antiqua, 1, 4, 2013, p. 283-295.
– (2016) “Towards a comprehensive edition of the evidence for Presocratic philosophers in the Herculaneum papyri,” The journal of juristic papyrology, Supplements, Proceedings of the 27th international congress of papyrology 2013, 28, 2016, p. 315-345.
[Emp.: p. 317-319, p. 327-331, A 33, B 111, B 137.]
– (2016) “Catalogue of the evidence for Presocratics in the Herculaneum Papyri,” Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete, 62, 1, 2016, p. 78-108.
– (2021) “Review of T. Wellmann, Die Entstehung der Welt - Studien zum Straßburger Empedokles-Papyrus,” BMCR, 2021.03.35.
– (2021) The Presocratics at Herculaneum. A study of early Greek philosophy in the Epicurean tradition. With an appendix on Diogenes of Oinoanda’s criticism of Presocratic philosophy, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2021, (Studia Praesocratica, 11).
[Emp. p. 188-209, 458-488, 613-620. A 86, B 2, B 6, B 8, B 17, B 21, B 96, B 98, B 100, B 111, B 112, B 128, B 134, B 142.]
Vattuone, Riccardo, “Timeo F 119 b. Empedocle e Timoleonte,” Rivista storica dell’antichità, 15, 1985, p. 224-236.
[B 128.1-2.]
Vaute, Paul, “Un Empédocle inédit révélé par un papyrus de Haute-Égypte,” La Libre Belgique, 4 mars 1999, p. 24.
Veazie, Walter Broad, Empedocles’s psychological doctrine in its original and its traditional setting, Diss. Columbia University 1917. (Printed in Archives of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method, 14, New York 1922.)
Vegetti, Mario, “Empedocle ‘medico e sofista’(Antica medicina 20),” Elenchos 19, 2, 1998, p. 345-359.
[A 71. Elenchos 19/2 = Empedocle e la cultura della Sicilia antica: Illustrazione di un frammento inedito della sua opera. Atti del Convegno tenuto ad Agrigento dal 4 al 6 settembre 1997.]
– “Empedocle ‘medico e sofista’ (Antica Medicina 20),” in: Text and tradition. Studies in ancient medicine and its transmission presented to Jutta Kollesch, ed. Klaus-Dietrich Fischer & Diethard Nickel & Paul Potter, Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill 1998, p. 289-299.
[A 71, Iatrikos logos, B 112, B 111.]
– Ιστορία της αρχαίας φιλοσοφίας, μτφρ. Γ.Χ. Δημητρακόπουλος, Αθήνα: Τραυλός 2000.
[P. 100-107 + 112-114 (Εμπεδοκλής).]
– “Athanatizein. Strategie di immortalità nel pensiero greco,” in: Vegetti M., Dialoghi con gli antichi, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin 2007, p. 165-178.
Veikos [Βέϊκος], Theophilos [Θεόφιλος], “Χῶρος καὶ χρόνος στὴν κοσμολογία τοῦ Ἐμπεδοκλῆ,” Hellenica, 22, 1969, p. 326-340.
– “ΕΜΠΕΔΟΚΛΗΣ (B 35, 3-4). Η ΚΟΣΜΙΚΉ ΔΙΝΗ,” Hellenica, 24, 1971, p. 312-320.
[Β 35.]
Velardi, Roberto, “La testimonianza di Aristotele sulle origini della retorica,” AION Annali dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli «L’Orientale», XXX, 2008, p. 99-113.
Veneciano, Gustavo, “El fr. 139 DK de Empédocles y el ensemble ‘d’ del papiro de Estrasburgo. A propósito de una nueva edición,” Argos, 35, 2, 2012, p. 92-103.
http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1853-63792012000200006&script=sci_arttext
[B 139, d.]
Verdenius, Willem Jacob, “Empedocles’ doctrine of sight,” in: Studia varia Carolo Guilielmo Vollgraff a discipulis oblata, Amsterdam: North/Holland Pub. Co. 1948, p. 155-164.
[B 84.]
– “Notes on the Presocratics,” Mnemosyne, IV, 1, 1, 1948, p. 8-14.
[VIII: The meaning of πίστις in Empedocles; IX: Empedocles Frag. 26, 2; B 3, B 26., B 71, B 114.]
– Parmenides. some comments on his poem, Groningen-Batavia 1942.
Verdenius, W. J. & Waszink, Jan Henrik, Aristotle On coming-to-be and passing-away, some comments, Leiden: Brill 1946.
[P. 64-67. B 8, B 35.15.]
Vergados, Athanassios, The Homeric Hymn to Hermes. Introduction, text and commentary, Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter 2013, (Texte und Kommentare, 41).
– “Hesiod, Empedocles and the language of didactic poetry,” in: Empedocles in Sicily, ed. Elbert Decker, Jessica, & Jennifer Ferriss-Hill & Heather L. Reid, Siracusa (Sicily)-Dakota Dunes (SD): Parnassos Press 2024, (The Heritage of Western Greece, 12).
Vergnioux, Alain, “La "panhumanité" d’Empédocle,” Le Télémaque, 19, 1, 2001, p. 29-36.
Vernant, Jean-Pierre, “Du mythe à la raison. La formation de la pensée positive dans la Grèce archaïque,” Annales. Économies, sociétés, civilisations, 12, 2, 1957, p. 183-206.
[B 129.]
– “Le fleuve « Amélès » et la « Mélétè Thanatou »,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger, 150, 1960, p. 163-179.
[B 2, B 3, B 4, B 5, B 110, B 115, B 121, B 132.]
– Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs : études de psychologie historique, I, Paris: François Maspero 1965 (reimpr. 1971).
[P. 93-95, 102-104. 113-114, 117-121. B 4, B 110, B 111, B 112, B 115, B 117, B 121, B 129, B 132, B 146, B 147.]
– Myth and thought among the Greeks, translated by, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1983. (Later in New York: Zone books 2006).
Versnel, H.S., Coping with the Gods: wayward readings in Greek theology, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2011. [P. 464-465: B 112, B 146, B 147.]
Vertue, H. S. H., “Venus and Lucretius,” Greece and Rome, 3, 2, 1956, p. 140-152.
Vian, Francis, Apollonios de Rhodes. Argonautiques, I, chants I-II, Texte établi et commenté par F. V., traduit par E. Delage, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1974, (Collection des Universités de France).
– Apollonios de Rhodes. Argonautiques, II, chant III, Texte établi et commenté par F. V., traduit par E. Delage, Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1995², (Collection des Universités de France).
– Apollonios de Rhodes. Argonautiques, III, chant IV, Texte établi et commenté par F. V., traduit par E. Delage et F. V., Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2000², (Collection des Universités de France).
Viano, Cristina, “Aristote, De coel. I 10: Empédocle, l’alternance et le mythe du ‘Politique’,” Revue des études grecques 107, 1994/2, p. 400-413.
Vicaire, Paul, “Review of J. Bollack Empédocle II et III - 1972,” Revue de Philologie, de Littérature et d’histoire anciennes, 46, 1972, p. 110-115.
Vidal Triñanes, Ángela, Empédocles, Deus suposto: O filósofo, o poeta, o taumaturgo e o home, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Facultade de filoloxía, grao en filoloxía clásica, 2016.
https://baleiro.academia.edu/%C3%81ngelaVidalTri%C3%B1anes
Videau, Anne, “Les Métamorphoses d’Ovide, une cosmogonie originale,” in: Les Présocratiques à Rome, ed. S. Franchet d’Espèrey & C. Lévy, Paris: Presses de l'université Paris-Sorbonne 2018, p. 347-361. [Emp.: p. 356-357, 361.]
Viltanioti, Irini-Fotini, L’harmonie des Sirènes du pythagorisme ancien à Platon, Boston-Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2015, (Studia Praesocratica, 7).
[Tetractys. A 1, B 6, B 32, B 42, B 115, B 117, B 129.]
Vítek, Tomáš, (2001) Empedoklés: I. / Studie, Praha: Herrmann & synové 2001.
[See: https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/tomas-vitek]
– (2004) “Nové Empedokleovy verše,” Reflexe, 27, 2004, p. 75-94.
– (2006) Empedoklés: II. / Zlomky, Praha: Herrmann & synové 2006.
[[ + ]. 576 pages: edition of all testimonies, contexts of the citations, fragments, and translations, bibliography, Index. See:
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/tomas-vitek.]
– Empedoklés: III. / Komentář, Praha: Herrmann & synové 2006.
[[ + ]. 680 pages: commentary of all testimonies and fragments. See:
https://sites.google.com/site/empedoclesacragas/tomas-vitek.]
– (2010) “Le Sphairos d’Empédocle et son substrat mythologique,” Elenchos, 31, 1, 2010, p. 23-49.
Vivarelli, Vivetta, “Empedokles und Zarathustra: Verschwendeter Reichtum und Wollust am Untergang,” Nietzsche Studien, 18, 1, 1989, p. 509-536.
Vlastos, Gregory, “The disorderly motion in the Timaios,” The Classical Quarterly, 33, 2, 1939, p. 71-83.
– “Equality and justice in early Greek philosophy,” Classical Philology, 42, 3, 1947, p. 156-178.
[Emp.: p. 158-161.]
– “Religion and medicine in the cult of Asclepius: A Review Article,” The Review of Religion, 13.1, 1948 (November), p. 268-290.
[P. 272-3: B 111.9 plus A 1, par. 60-2.]
– “The physical theory of Anaxagoras,” The Philosophical Review, 59, 1, 1950, p. 31-57.
[P. 34, 37-38: B 6. – P. 37: B 35, B 17, B 26. – P. 45: B 98, B 96.]
– “Theology and philosophy in early Greek thought,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 7, 1952, p. 97-123.
[Emp.: p. 119-121. Soul, transmigration.]
Voilquin, Jean, Les Penseurs grecs avant Socrate : de Thalès de Milet à Prodicos, traduction, introduction, notices et notes par J. V., Paris: Garnier Frères 1941 (Classiques Garnier).
[Emp.: Chap VI, p. 97-122, 229-231. Reprint Les Penseurs grecs avant Socrate : de Thalès de Milet à Prodicos, traduction, introduction et notes par J. V., Paris: Garnier-Flammarion 1964, (GF 31); Empedocles: Chap VI, p. 115-141, p. 236-238. Several reprints.]
Volf, Marina N. [Wolf, ВОЛЬФ M. H.], “Early Greek philosophy and the Iranian dualism: Parmenides and Empedocles,” Paper presented at the 2nd World Congress on Mulla Sadra. Tehran, 2004 (May 21–25, 2004 Tehran - Iran), 2004, p. 1-14.
[Downloadable from
https://nsc.academia.edu/MarinaVolf .]
– “Двоякое скажу": аргументация Эмпедокла в пользу плюрализма (В 17 DK),” ΣΧΟΛΗ, 10. 1, 2016, p. 146-163.
[‘Double tale’: Empedocles arguments for plurality, B 17.]
Vollgraff, W., “Elementum,” Mnemosyne, 2, 1949, p. 89-115.
[B 6.]
von Arnim, Hans, “Die Weltperioden bei Empedokles,” in: Festschrift Theodor Gomperz, dargebracht zum siebzigsten Geburtstage am 29 März 1902 von schülern freunden Collegen, Vienna: Alfred Hölder 1902, p. 16-27.
– “Die europäische Philosophie des Altertums,” in: Allgemeine Geschichte der Philosophie, ed. P. Hinneberg, Berlin-Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1909, (Die Kultur der Gegenwart, I, 5), p. 115-287.
[Emp.: p. 136-139.]
von Fritz, Kurt, “ΝΟΥΖ, ΝΟΕΙΝ, and their derivatives in Pre-socratic philosophy. Part II. The Post-parmenidean Period,” Classical Philology, 41, 1, 1946, p. 12-34.
[Emp.: p. 13-21. This study was reprinted in: The Pre-Socratics, ed. A. P. D. Mourelatos, Princeton University Press 1993², revised edition of a first publication in 1974, p. 23-85, Emp.: p. 55-67. B 2, B 3, B 4, B 5, B 17, B 105, B 106, B 109, B 133, B 134.]
– “᾿Εστρὶς ἑϰατέρωθι in Pindar’s Second Olympian and Pythagoras’ theory of metempsychosis,” in: Phronesis, 2, 2, 1957, p. 85-89.
[B 115, B 146.]
von Staden, Heinrich, “The discovery of the body: Human dissection and its cultural contexts in Ancient Greece,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 65, 1992, p. 223-241.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2589595/pdf/yjbm00051-0069.pdf
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Ulrich, “Lesefrüchte,” Hermes, 37, 1902, p. 326-327.
[B 27a.]
– “Lesefrüchte,” Hermes, 40, 1905, p. 165-170.
– “Die Καθαρμοί des Empedokles,” Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 27, 1929, p. 626-661.
[Published also separately in: Kleine Schriften, I, Klassische griechische Poesie, Berlin: Weidmann 1935, p. 473-521. [+ +].]
– “Lesefrüchte,” Hermes, 65, 1930, p. 245-250.
[B 35.3-4, B 9, B 17, B 21 etc.]
– “Die Gedichte des Empedokles,” Forschungen und Fortschritte, 6, 1930, p. 50-51.
– Der Glaube der Hellenen I-II, Berlin 1931-1932.
Vossius, Gerardus Ioannes, De historicis Graecis libri I, Lugduni Batavorum, ex officina Ioannis Maire, 16512.
[P. 437-438. A sketch of Emp. biography; B 33.]
– “Empedocles,” in: The great historical geographical and poetical dictionary, sixth edition corrected and enlarged by J. Leclerc, printed for Henry Rhodes, London 1690, Volume I, without pagination.
[A very concise sketch of Emp. life and work; unvaluable.]
Voultsiadou, Eleni & Chariton Chintiroglou, “Aristotle’s lantern in echinoderms: an ancient riddle,” Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 49, 3, 2008, p. 299-302.
[B 84. Cf. Lennox 1983.]
Wackernagel, Jacob, “Orthographica und Verwandtes,” Philologus, 86, 1931, p. 133-144.
[P. 133-140, section 1 ἱδρώς und Zubehör. B 21.4, B 62.5, B 73.2.]
Wachsmuth, Curt (ed.), Ioannis Stobaei anthologium, Eclogae Physicae et Ethicae, I & II, Berlin: Weidmann 1884.
[B 115.1-2: Book II, chap.8, section 42, line 24-25.]
Wachsmuth, Günther, “Empedokles, der faustische Mensch vor Christus,” Das Goethaneum, Internationale Wochenschrift für Anthroposophie und Dreigliederung, Jahrgang 2, 18, 1923, p. 140-142 (9. 12) and Jahrgang 3, 19, 1923 (16. 12), p. 147-149.
[Pars I is reprinted also in: Anthroposophie, 5, 32, 1924 (7. 2. 1924), p. 1-2, and 5, 33, 1924 (14. 2), p. 1-2.]
Wacziarg Engel, Aude Priya, Hésiode. Théogonie : Un chant du cosmos, Paris: Fayard 2014, (Ouvertures, bilingues).
[P. 18: B 6, a short support to Zeus = aither, Hera = earth, Aïdôneus = fire.]
Wada, Toshihiro, “The Period of Present World in Empedocles,” Methodos [A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, published at Kyoto University] 29, 1997, p. ???.
http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ancphil/methodos/methodos_OLD/methodos29.html#wada
Https://sites.google.com/site/ancientphilkyoto/
Wagner, G., Hölderlin und die Vorsokratiker, diss. Würzburg: Triltsch 1937 (= Bamberg 1983).
Warren, James, Presocratics, Stocksfield: Acumen 2007, (Ancient philosophies).
[Emp.: p. 135-152, 201-203. B 6, B 12, B 17, B 23, B 112, B 115, B 137.]
Wash, Leon, Avery, Fruit of the mind: metaphor and the concept of nature in Pindar and Empedocles, Diss. Department of Classics, The University of Chicago, June 2021.
[B 6, B 8.]
– “Artfully false duals in Empedocles’ painters simile (fr. 23 DK) and the hexameter tradition,” Symbolae Osloenses, 2023, on-line p. 1-32.
[B 23, B 128, B 137.]
– “Empedocles’ account of wine (fr. 81) and premodern oenology,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 64, 2, 2024, p. 162-194.
[B 78, B 79, B 80, B 81, B 91.]
– “Two additional false duals in Empedocles (fr. 15 DK),” Symbolae Osloenses, 2024, on-line p. 1-11.
[B 15.]
– “Review of Jean-Claude Picot, Empédocle sur le chemin des dieux. Anagôgê, 15. Paris: Les Belles lettres, 2022. Pp. 748,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review, BMCR 2025.01.20, 2025.
https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2025/2025.01.20/
Waterfield, Robin, The first philosophers: the Presocratics and Sophists, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000, (Oxford World’s Classics).
[Emp.: p. 133-163 - 24 testimonies, 50 fragments.]
Waters, Kenneth H., “The Rise and Decline of Some Greek Colonies in Sicily,” Ancient Society,5, 1974, p. 1-19.
[A 1; on Acragas and its situation in fifth century BC.]
Heirs of Wechel, André (printer), Plutarchi Chaeronensis omnium, quae exstant, operum Tomus secundus, continens Moralia, Francfort: A. Wechel heredes 1599, p. 607.
[B 115: p. 607. Greek by Estienne 1572.]
Wee, John, Z. (ed.), The comparable body: analogy and metaphor in ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman medicine, Leiden-Boston: Brill 2017, (Studies in ancient medicine, 49).
[A 70, B 62, B 100, B 105.]
Wehrli, Fritz, Herakleides Pontikos, Basel - Stuttgart: Schwabe & Co. 19692, (Die Schule des Aristoteles, Texte und Kommentar, VII). First edition: Basel: Schwabe & Co. 1953.
[A 1.]
Weiher, A., Heraklit und Empedokles, Progr. Kaiserslauten 1916.
Weische, Alfons, “Quam varie et diverse Empedocles et Lucretius praepositionibus usi sint, parvula de linguis comparandis disputatio,” in: Loquela vivida. Donum natalicium Nicolao Sallmann sexagesimum quintum annum agenti a fautoribus linguae Latinae vivae oblatum, ed. Jürgen Blänsdorf, Würzburg 1999, p. 11-20.
Wellmann, Eduard, “Review of Th. Gomperz, Griechischer Denker. Die deutsche Litteratur über die Vorsokratiker 1894 bis 1900,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 15, 1, 1902, p. 113-132.
[Emp.: p. 113-114.]
– “Empedokles (3),” in: Pauly-Wissowa Real Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, Band 5/10, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler 1905, p. 2507-2512.
Wellmann, Max, Die Fragmente der sikelischen Ärzte Akron, Philistion und des Diokles von Karystos, Berlin: Weidmann 1901.
[P. 15: A 84, A 86.10, B 105, B 107 - p. 18: B 105 - p. 21: A 98 - p. 23: A 85 - p. 30-31 - p. 35: A 79, A 83 - p. 36: A 81 - p. 38: A 83.– p. 72: A74, B 6 - p. 73: A 74, B 105.]
Wellmann, Tom, Die Entstehung der Welt: Studien zum Straßburger Empedokles-Papyrus, Berlin-Boston: W. de Gruyter 2020, (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte, 142).
– “Schuldhaftes Handeln in Empedokles’ Physika und Katharmoi,” in: Praxis – Handeln und Handelnde in antiker Philosophie: Akten des 6. Kongresses der Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie 2019, ed. F. Buddensiek & S. Odzuck, Berlin-Boston: Walter de Gruyter 2023, (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 397), p. 15-32.
[B 20, B 35, B 112, B 129, B 135, B 136, B 137, B 139, d1-7 MP, Physika I, 291–300. Proposal of edition of d7: [οὐδ]ὲ μάτη[ν ἐν] τῷδε νο[μῷ κατέδ]ευσα παρειάς.]
Welsh, Jarrett, T., “Giovanni Aurispa’s manuscript of Empedocles,” Mnemosyne, 2020, p. 1-5 (Online Publication), Mnemosyne, 73, 5, 2020, p. 826-830 (Printed Publication).
Wendland, Paul, “Das Gewand der Eitelkeit,” Hermes, 51, 1916, p. 481-485.
[B 126.]
– (ed), Hippolytus Werke, dritter Band, Refutatio omnium haeresium, Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs 1916, (Die Griechischen Christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten drei Jahrhunderte).
Wenskus, Otta, “Empedokles Erklärung der Entstehung der Sonnenfinsternisse das Fragment DK 31 B 42,” Hermes, 108, 2, 1980, p. 243-248.
[B 42.]
Wernsdorff, Gottlieb, De metempsychosi veterum, non figurate sed proprie intelligenda, Wittemberg: Tzschiedrich 1741.
[Emp.: p. 37-39.]
Wersinger, Anne Gabrièle, (1997-1998) “Muses d’Ionie, Muses de Sicile (Sophiste, 242 d 6-243 a 2),” ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ, 27-28, 1997-1998, p. 98-110.
[B 35. First name of the author of this article wrongly written Annie Gabrielle.]
– (2001) “Review of R. Laurenti, Empedocle,” Études philosophiques, 4, Oct - Dec 2001, p. 558-560.
– (2003) “Empédocle et Homère. L’Un et le Multiple dans la répétition formulaire,” Diotima, 31, 2003, p. 11-20.
– (2004) “La ‘fête criminelle’ (Empédocle, Perséphone et les Charites),” in: La Fête : la rencontre du sacré et du profane, ed. M. Mazoyer, J. Pérez Rey, F. Malbran-Labat & R. Lebrun, Paris: L’Harmattan 2004, p. 109-131.
– (2008) La Sphère et l'intervalle : le schème de l'Harmonie dans la pensée des anciens Grecs d'Homère à Platon, Grenoble: Jerôme Millon 2008, (Horos).
[Chap. 2: Empédocle, l’Harmonie infinie comme Un, p. 63-97; B 17, B 24, B 26, B 27, B 30, B 31, B 35, B 61, B 71, B 96, B 99, B 100, B 109, B 110, B 123.]
– (2008) “'Les portes du Jour et de la Nuit' : Rôle et fonction des colonnes de contraires (sustoichiai) dans l’histoire du catalogue,” Textuel, 56, (L’Énonciation en Catalogue, ed. E. Valette, C. Calame & F. Dupont), 2008, p. 235-253.
[P. 250-251: B 122, B 123.]
– (2012) “Présentation de ‘Empédocle, les dieux, le sacrifice et la grâce’,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 75, 3, 2012 p. 291-299.
– (2012) “Empédocle, la violence sacrificielle et la grâce,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 75, 3, 2012, p. 379-402.
– (2012) “Empédocle et la poétique de l’analogie dans le fragment 84,” ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ, 42, 2012, p. 41-65.
[B 84.]
Wersinger Taylor, Gabrièle (previously Wersinger, Anne Gabrièle), “Κατελεξα chez Empédocle: Le Fr. 35 dans la perspective du Κατaλεξαi homérique,” ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑ, 50, 2020, p. 57-68.
[B 8, B 17, B 35.]
– See also titles with Perceau, Sylvie.
West, Martin Litchfield, (1962) “Empedocles on papyrus,” The Classical Review, 12, 1962, p. 120.
[B 115.6. P.Ibscher 2.10-11 = CPF 2T.10 See Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, abbreviated in CPF, Corpus of Greek and Latin Philosophical Papyri. Texts and Lexicon.]
– (1966) “ζωρός in Empedocles,” The Classical Review, 16, 1966, p. 135-136.
[B 35.15.]
– (1966) Hesiod. Theogony, edited with prolegomena and commentary by M. L. West, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1966. Reprint in 1971.
[B 115: p. 374.]
– (1968) “Notes on newly-discovered fragments of Greek authors,” Maia, 20, 1968, p. 195-205.
[Emp.: p. 199-200: 152Wright on Herodian, B 75.]
– (1971) Early Greek philosophy and the Orient, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1971.
[P. 233-235 et passim.]
– (1983) The Orphic Poems, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1983.
[P. 108: Sphairos.]
– (1999) “Towards Monotheism,” in: Pagan Monotheism in late Antiquity, ed. A. Athanasssiadi & M. Frede, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999, p. 21-40.
[Emp.: p. 35-36, B 6, B 21.9, B 27, B 31, B 115, B 134.]
Westman, Rolf, Plutarch gegen Kolotes: seine Schrift ‘Adversus Colotem’ als philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle, Helsinki: Societas Philosophica 1955, (Acta philosophica Fennica, 7).
[A 14, B 8, B 9, B 10, B 15, B 17, B 21, B 22, B 23, B 33, B 34, B 35, B 60, B 61, B 89, B 95. B 96, B 111.]
Wheelwright, Philip, The Presocratics, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing 1960. Reprint in New York: The Odyssey Press 1966.
[Emp.: p. 122-154. Translation of 105 fragments and 52 testimonia.]
Whitman, Cedric.H., “Hera’s anvils,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 74, 1970, p. 37-42.
[B 6.]
Wieck, Felix, Sphaeram Empedoclis quae dicitur, recensuit et dissertationem adiecit F. W., diss., Lipsiae, Hirschfeld 1897.
[xxxviii, 37 p.; B 161.]
Wilcox, Joel, “Empedocles,” in: Ancient Greek authors, ed. W. W. Briggs, Detroit-Washington D.C.-London: Gale research 1997, (Dictionary of literary biography, 176), p. 128-133.
– “'Whole-natured forms' in Empedocles’s cosmic cycle,” in: Essays in ancient Greek philosophy VI: before Plato, ed. A. Preus, Albany: State University of New York Press 2001, p. 109-122.
[B 17, B 21, B 26, B 27, B 29, B 57, B 61, B 62.]
Wildberg, Christian, “Commentary on Curd: A new Empedocles,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 17, 1, 2001, p. 50-59.
Wilford, P. A., “Embryological analogies in Empedocles’ cosmogony,” Phronesis, 13, 1968, p. 108-118.
[A 51, B 35, B 100.]
Wilkens, Karsten, “Wie hat Empedokles die Vorgänge in der Klepsydra erklärt?,” Hermes, 95.2, 1967, p. 129-140.
[B 100.]
Wilkins, Ernest H., “Empedocles in Filelfo’s terza rima,” Speculum, 38, p. 318-323.
[B 161.]
Willi, Andreas, The languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of linguistic variation in classical attic Greek, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003, (Oxford Classical Monographs).
[P. 101-113.]
– Sikelismos: Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im griechischen Sizilien (8.-5. Jh. v. Chr.), Basel: Schwabe 2008, (Bibliotheca Helvetica Romana, 29).
[P. 193-279, 303-5; several fragments; p. 226-228: B 6 (backing Kingsley’s view).]
Williams, C. J. F., Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione, translated with notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1982, (Clarendon Aristotle series). Reprinted in 2002.
Wilson, Roberto, D., Empedocles, dialogus graecus, proemio Gaisfordiano dignatus, Oxford: T. and G. Shrimpton 1857.
Windet, James, ΣΤΡΩΜΑΤΕΥΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΟΛΙΚΟΣ, De vita functorum statu: ex Hebraeorum & Graecorum comparatis sententiis concinnatus […] Editio secunda, recognita: ac tertia parte auctior, London: Th. Roycroft 1664². Reprint in London: Th. Roycroft, J. Martyn 16773. Then a reprint in Th. Crenius, Fasciculus quartus. Opusculorum quae ad historiam ac philologiam sacram spectant, Rotterdam: P. van der Slaart 1694.
[First edition of the book in London: Roycroft 1663. For B 115.13, see p. 107 in 1664 and in 1677; see p. 85 in 1694. It is the first time in 1664 that we read εἶμι written in B 115.13 instead of εἰμι.]
Winnefeld, Hermann, “Die Philosophie des Empedokles. Ein Versuch von Dr. H. W.,” in: Beilage zum Programm des Grossherzoglichen Gymnasiums in Donaueschingen von Schuljahr 1861/1862, Rastatt: W. Mayer 1862.
Wismann, Heinz, “Le métier de philologue (I),” Critique, 276, 1970, p. 462-479.
[Review of J. Bollack and D. O’Brien.]
– “Le métier de philologue (II),” Critique, 279-280, 1970, p. 774-781.
– Le métier de philologue, Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne 2021, (Tirés à part, 18, texte envoyé par Pierre Judet de La Combe). From Critique, 276 and 279-280.
Wiśniewski, Bohdan, “Quaestiones Empedocleae,” La Parola di Passato, 29, 1974, p. 158-171.
[A 30, A 31, A 32, B 134.4-5, B 3.9-13, B 2 etc.; a curious article postulates quite improbable theses on 4 roots, Love - Strife, sphairos, and phren hiere.]
Wöhrle, Georg, “Carmini divini pectoris oder prodesse und delectare bei Lucrez und Empedokles,” Wiener Studien, 104, 1991, p. 119-129.
[A 21.]
– “Bemerkungen zur lehrhaften Dichtung zwischen Empedokles und Arat,” in: Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, ed. von W. Kullmann - J. Althoff & M. Asper, Tübingen: Narr 1998, p. 279-286.
Wolf, Marina: see Volf.
Wolfsdorf, David, Trials of reason: Plato and the crafting of philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
[A 95.]
– “Empedocles and his ancient readers on desire and pleasure,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 36, 2009, p. 1-71.
– Pleasure in ancient Greek philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012, (Key themes in ancient philosophy).
[A 86.]
Wolf-Hartmut, Friedrich, “Ennius-Erklärungen,” Philologus, 97, 1948, p. 277-301.
[Emp.: p. 291-293.]
Woodbridge, Frederick J.E., “The dominant conception of the earliest Greek philosophy,” The philosophical Review, 10, 4, 1901, p. 359-374.
[B 8.]
Woolerton, Emma, “The roots of Lucretius’ tree-men, De rerum natura 2.702–3,” The Classical Quarterly (New Series), 60, 01, 2010, p. 255-257.
[A 70, B 21, B 61, B 82, B 143.]
Worthen, Thomas, “Pneumatic action in the Klepsydra and Empedocles’ account of breathing,” Isis, 61, 1970, p. 520-530.
[B 100.]
Wright, Jonathan, “An Italian book on Empedocles,” The Scientific Monthly, 12, 1921, p. 339-348.
[Partly a review of E. Bignone, 1916.]
Wright, John Henry, “The origin of Plato’s cave,” Harvard studies in classical philology, 17, 1906, p. 31-142.
[B 120.]
Wright, Maureen Rosemary (see also Arundel for previous works), (1981) Empedocles: The extant fragments, New Haven-London: Yale University Press 1981. (Reprint: London: Bristol Classical Press 19862; reprint with new bibliography: London: Bristol Classical Press 19953 and Hackett Publishing Co., reprint 20014.)
[+ +]
– (1985) The Presocratics, London: Duckworth (Bristol: Bristol Classical Press), 1985.
[P. 27-33, 107-121.]
– (1990) “Presocratic minds,” in: The Person and the human mind: issues in ancient and modern philosophy, ed. Ch. Gill, Oxford: Clarendon 1990, p. 207-225.
[B 2, B 105, B 106, B 108, B 109, B 110, B 114, B 133.]
– (1995) Cosmology in Antiquity, London-New York: Routledge1995, (Sciences of Antiquity).
[B 6, B 17, B 22, B 23, B 30, B 35, B 38, B 55, B 73, B 82, B 100, B 109, B 134.]
– (1996) “Review of P. Kingsley, Ancient Philosophy,” Phronesis, 41, 1, 1996, p. 111-112.
– (1996)“Empedokles,” in: Philosophie der Antike I-II, ed. F. Ricken, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1996, I, p. 111-128.
– (1997) “Empedocles,” in: The Routledge history of philosophy, volume I, From the beginning to Plato, ed. C. C. W. Taylor, London: Routledge 1997, p. 175-207. Reprint in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005, p. 165-191.
– (1997) “Philosopher poets: Parmenides and Empedocles,” in: Form and content in didactic poetry, ed. C. Atherton, Bari: Levante 1997, (Nottingham Classical Literature Studies, 5), p. 1-22.
– (2006) “Review of S. Trépanier, Empedocles 2004,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 126, 2006, p. 209-210.
– (2009) Introducing Greek philosophy, Durham: Acumen 2009.
[B 6, B 23, B 27, B 29, B 96, B 110, B 115, B 146.]
– (2021) “Is Presocratic cosmology atheistic?,” in: Penser les dieux avec les Présocratiques, ed. R. Saetta Cottone, Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm 2021, p. 15-27.
[Emp.: p. 23-24; B 3, B 6, B 21, B 27, B 59, B 131, B 134, B 146.]
Wrotkowski, Wojciech, “… τῇ μὲν ἡλικίᾳ πρότερος …τοῖς δ’ ἔργοις ὕστερος…: relacja między Anaksagorasem i Empedoklesem według Arystotelesa, kilku zapomnianych komentatorów antycznych i niektórych słynnych uczonych współczesnych,” Archiwum Historii Filozofii i Myśli Społecznej, 63, 2018, p. 299-326.
https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=755338
[The relation between Anaxagoras and Empedocles according to Aristotle, Several forgotten ancient commentators and some famous modern scholar.]
Wybrands, Aemilius Willem, “Nog over Empedokles,” De Nederlandsche Spectator, 51, 1879, p. 406.
Wyttenbach, Daniel, Albert, Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia, III, Oxford: Clarendon 1797.
[De exilio, B 115: p. 306-307.]
Xylander, Guilielmus (Wilhelm Holtzmann), Plutarchi chaeronensis, Moralia […] omnes de graeca in latinam linguam transscripti summe labore, Basel: Thomas Guarinus 1570.
[Latin edition. P. 555: B 115, De exilio. Reprint in 1572 in Venice (apud Hieronymum Scotum), now p. 322.]
– Plutarchi chaeronensis omnium, quae exstant, operum. Tomus Secundus, continens Moralia, 1572.
[P. 607. A column with Latin facing a column with Greek. The Greek text is that of Estienne (Stephanus) 1572.]
– Plutarchi chaeronensis, philosophorum & historicorum principis varia scripta, quae Moralia vulgo dicuntur […] a Guil. Xylandro, Basel: E. Episcopium et Nicolai fr. haeredes 1574.
[P. 428. Greek edition, B 115, De exilio. φόβωι.]
Xylinas, Michalés (Ξυλινάς Μιχάλης Ε.), Η προσωκρατική φιλοσοφία και οι σύγχρονες φυσικές επιστήμες: ο Εμπεδοκλής σαν σύνδεσμος, Αθήνα: Δωδώνη 1997.
Xylinas, Michalés & Tzavaras, Giannis, “Ο Εμπεδοκλής Ακραγαντίνος ως επίκαιρος ιατροφιλόσοφος,” Ελληνική φιλοσοφική επιθεώρηση: επιστημονικά περιοδικά, 12, 1995, p. 111-128.
Yli-Karjanmaa, Sami, Reincarnation in Philo of Alexandria, Atlanta: SBL Press 2015, (Studia Philonica Monographs, 7).
[Publication of a dissertation in 2013. SBl=Society of Biblical Literature. Emp.: p. 52, 69, p. 133, 137, B 115.]
Yourcenar, Marguerite, “Empédocle d’Agrigente,” Revue générale. Perspectives européennes des sciences humaines, 1970, 1, p. 31-46.
– “Empédocle,” in: La Couronne et la Lyre: poèmes traduits du grec, Paris: Gallimard 1979, (Poésie), p. 174-192.
[ + ].
Zaborowski, Robert, “L'affectivité dans les fragments des Présocratiques : THYMOS et PHREN,” Parnassos, 47, 2005, p. 5-24.
– Sur le sentiment chez les Présocratiques. Contribution psychologique à la philosophie des sentiments, Varsovie: Stakroos 2008.
[p. 78-91 : θυμός, φρήν, νόος; p. 165-167 : λόγος in B 4.3.]
Zafiropulo, Jean, Empédocle d’Agrigente, Paris: Les Belles lettres 1953, (Collection d’études anciennes).
[[+ +].]
– Εμπεδοκλέους Καθαρμοί, texte établi et annoté par J. Z., traduction, le poème des purifications, Paris: A. Tallon 1954.
[A de luxe reprint of the part of the study 1953.]
– Εμπεδοκλέους Περι φύσεως. Seguono, di J. Z. una traduzione francese e uno scritto dal titolo “Les théories d’Empédocle et leur contexte”, Alpignano: Tallone 1962.
Zanatta, Marcello, “Empedocle,” in: M. Zanatta, Storia della filosofia antica, Milan: Rizzoli 2012, (Biblioteca Universale, Bur), p. 58-61.
Zatta, Claudia, (2016) Plants’ interconnected lives: From Ovid’s myths to Presocratic thought and beyond,” Arion, 24.2, 2016, p. 101-126.
[A70, A 72, B 79, B 82, B 83.]
– (2017) Interconnectedness: The living world of the early Greek philosophers, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2017, (International Pre-Platonic Studies, 7).
[P. 30-37, 41-43, 46-47, 61-62. 2nd revised edition, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 2019, (International Pre-Platonic Studies, 7), 387 pages vs 1st ed. of 305 pages.]
https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783896657978/interconnectedness
– (2018) “Aristotle on the "Sweat of the earth" (DK 31 B 55),” Philosophia, 48, 2018, p. 55-70.
[A 30, A 56, A 66, B 52, B 55, B 68, B 79, B 82, B 84, B 96.]
– (2020) “Is matter alive? Between roots and daemons: Empedocles’ philosophy of life,” Civiltà e religioni, 6, 2020, p. 49-72.
[A 70, A 72, B 3, B 6, B 8, B 9, B 15, B 109, B 117, B 115, B 146.]
– (2022) Aristotle and the animals: the logos of life itself, Abingdon - New York: Routledge 2022, (Routledge Monographs in Classical Studies).
[A 72, A 73, A 77, A 78, A 86, A 89, A 90, A 91, A 92, B 63, B 77, B 79, B 82, B 84, B 90, B 96, B 100, B 102, B 105, B 106, B 107, B 108, B 109.]
– (2022) “Early Greek philosophy on the question of life: plants’ physiology and life from the Presocratics to Aristotle,” Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 72, 189, 2022, p. 262-303.
[A 70, A 72, A 74, A 86, B 62, B 3, B 77, B 79, B 82, B 99, B 100, B 102, B 109, B 110.]
– (2022) “Empedocles on plants’ fructification,” Φιλοσοφία, 52, 2022, p. 387-391.
[This article was published in 2024. A 70, A 72, B 62, B 8, B 77, B 79, B 112, B 117.]
– (2023) “Plants and vegetal respiration in early Greek philosophy,” Ancient Philosophy, 43, 1, 2023, p. 251-272.
[A 70, A 72, A 73, A 74, B 55, B 62, B 77, B 78, B 79, B 82, B 100.]
– (2024) ““Is the embryo a living being?” (Aët. 5.15): embryology, plants, and the origin of life in presocratic thought,” Mnemosyne, 2024, on-line p.1-23.
– “Sensing the world: humans, plants, and the physicality of life in early Greek philosophy,” in: L’humain et le végétal. Processus et formes de vie partagés, ed. Sarah Carvallo & Arnaud Macé, Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté 2024, (Sciences : concepts et problèmes), p. 95-114.
[A 70, A 72, A 86, B 62, B 84, B 99, B 102, B 107, B 109, B 110.]
– “Oltre i confini. L’estensione della corporeità nei primi filosofi greci,” in: Condividuale. Genealogie di un concetto mancato, ed. C. Botti, D. Quarantotto, E. Stimilli & L. Valente, Roma: Quodlibet Studio 2024, p. 27-40.
[B 8, B 15, B 21.]
Zehner, Joseph, Genealogy in early Greek philosophy, Diss. University of Virginia, 2020.
Zeller, Eduard, Die Philosophie der Griechen, eine Untersuchung über Charakter, Gang und Hauptmomente ihrer Entwicklung, Theil 1, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, Tübingen: L.F. Fues 1844, p. 166-194. Second edition: Tübingen: L.F. Fues 1856 with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Theil 1, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, p. 500-575. Third edition: Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag (R. Reisland) 1869, with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Theil 1, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, p. 604-683. Fourth edition: Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag (R. Reisland) 1876, with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, p. 678-760. Fifth edition: Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1892, with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, Theil 1, Hälfte 2, p. 750-837. Sixth edition: Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1920 (ed. by W. Nestle), with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, p. 939-1038. Seventh edition: Leipzig: O.R. Reisland 1923 (ed. by W. Nestle), with title Die Philosophie der Griechen, in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, allgemeine Einleitung, vorsokratische Philosophie, T I, 1-2, p. 939-1038.
– “Über die griechischen Vorgänger Darwin’s,” Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1878, p. 111-124
[Emp.: p. 115-119.]
– “Über die ältesten Zeugnisse zur Geschichte des Pythagoras,” Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Berlin, 1889, p. 985-996.
[P. 990: B 155, A 1, par. 55. – French translation from the 4th edition in 1876: La philosophie des Grecs considérée dans son développement historique, par Édouard Zeller. I. La philosophie des Grecs avant Socrate, traduite de l’allemand, avec l’autorisation de l’auteur par Émile Boutroux, Tome deuxième. Les éléates – Héraclite, Empédocle […], Paris: Hachette et Cie 1882.]
Zeyl, Donald, J., “Empedocles,” in: The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, ed. R. S. Bagnall et al., Oxford: Blackwell 20131, p. 2390-2392 (Printed edition). Later available on Wiley online library.
Zeller, Eduard, & Rodolfo Mondolfo, La filosofia dei Greci nel suo sviluppo storico, I, I, V, Empedocle, Atomisti, Anassagora, trad. di D. Musti, testo della 5 edizione tedesca con nuovi aggiornamenti, ed. A. Capizzi, Firenze: La Nuova Italia 1969.
Zhmud, Leonid, (1997) Wissenschaft, Philosophie und Religion im frühen Pythagoreismus, Berlin: W. de Gruyter 1997.
[P. 33-34 (B 129), 127-128 (B 141), 247-248. (A 70, A 71, A 73).]
– (2001) “Revising doxography: Hermann Diels and his critics,” Philologus, 145, 2, 2001, p. 219-243.
– (2003) “Review of Ch. Riedweg, Pythagoras. Leben, Lehre, Nachwirkung,” Ancient Philosophy, 23, 2, 2003, p. 416-420.
[P. 417: Emp. was neither a Pythagorean nor an Orphic, though he was influenced by Orphism and Pythagoreanism; however, a common source of his poems cannot be determined.]
– (2006) The origin of the history-of-science in classical Antiquity, translated from the Russian by A. Chernoglazov, Berlin - New York: Walter de Gruyter 2006, (Peripatoi, 19).
– (2012) Pythagoras and the early Pythagoreans, translated from Russian by K. Windle and R. Ireland, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
[First published in Russian in 1994. Orphism. metempsychosis, transmigration. A 70, B 112, B 129, B 137.]
– (2018) “Physis in the pythagorean tradition,” Philologia Classica, 13, 1, 2018, p. 50-68.
[B 8.]
Ziegler, Konrat, “Menschen- und Weltwerden. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Mikrokosmosidee,” Neue Jahrbücher für das klassische Altertum, 31, 1913, p. 529-573.
[P. 534, n. 3: A 721, p. 535-537: 4 phases of zoogony, p. 536, n. 3: B 62.1-4, p. 539 a 553: B 61, 544 a 563: B 87; the basic purpose of the article is to prove heavy influence of Orphic material, which was allegedly mediated through Empedocles, on Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s Symposion.]
Zielinski, Siegfried, “Attraction and repulsion: Empedocles,” in: S. Zielinski, Deep time of the media: toward an archaeology of hearing and seeing by technical means, translated by Gloria Custance, Cambridge, Mass.-London: MIT Press 2006, p. 39-56.
[Originally published as Archäologie der Medien: Zur Tiefenzeit des technischen Hörens und Sehens, Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag 2002. Papyrus de Strasbourg. B 84, B 99.]
Živanovic, Miodrag, Fragmenti misticnog : Empedokle; izbor, prevod i predgovor Miodrag Zivanovic, Banja Luka: Litera 2003.
Zoumpos, A[nastasius?] N., Η εννοια της συμμετρίας εν τη διδασκαλία του Εμπεδοκλέους, Εν Αθήναις 1960 (= Φιλοσοφικά σημειώματα III, Αθηναι 1960).
– “Εις Εμπεδοκλέα,” Athena, 66, 1962, p. 298-300.
[B 23, B 27-28, B 96, B 98.]
– “Ποικίλα φιλολογικά και φιλοσοφικά,” Platon, 15, 1963, p. 142-143.
[B 147.]
Zuntz, Günther, “De Empedoclis librorum numero coniectura,” Mnemosyne, 18, 1965, p. 365.
[B 131, B 134.]
– “Empedokles fr. 137,” Wiener Studien, 79, 1966, p. 38-44.
[B 137.]
– Persephone: three essays on religion and thought in Magna Graecia, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1971. [P. 181-276: edition, translation and commentary of Katharmoi. [+ +].]
– Griechische philosophische Hymnen. Aus dem Nachlaß. Ed. v. Hubert Cancik und Lutz Käppel, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2005, (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum - Studies and texts in antiquity and Christianity, 35).
[P. 1-25: Ein philosophischer Hymnos des Empedokles?. B 134.]