Area3

AREAS NEEDING IMPROVEMENT

1. There is no formal research conducted to trace the employability of the graduates in order to support the claim for relevance of the offering and the verbal claim that graduates from the program are highly employable.

2. The legal basis for the course, as presented, is still the old CMO when there is already a new circular for the program.

3. The length of OJT period for the trainees have some issues bordering on labor laws violation and exploitation.

4. The students' researches given as course requirement are commendable. However, of the research outputs shown, there is no standard format/template which the students in the program/college should adopt.

5. Classes per year level are not provided with a faculty who would advise/guide students in all important aspects of their university life under the program, on a regular basis, not just during special events as enrolment, acquaintance parties or foundation days.

6. Absence of some retention policies in which the Program can use as the basis for screening students in order to support the University's thrust for quality education, and to truly produce quality and highly employable graduates.